tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post1823485988093920346..comments2023-12-15T18:16:43.357-06:00Comments on joeyisalittlekid: The Windsor of OzAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comBlogger110125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-1929171547524961572014-01-28T13:57:22.002-06:002014-01-28T13:57:22.002-06:00Waving~
Did I tell y'all about my new favorit...Waving~<br /><br />Did I tell y'all about my new favorite YouTube singer & my new fav song of hers? <br />She is so cute! And, her tune? It is so catchy! <br />I've been happily humming & have actually burst out in song several times!<br />Go take a listen & a peek! <br />If you are the teeniest bit drooped? It will perk you right up & make you giggle snort! <br />I had previously dedicated it exclusively to Aagent Alphabet-soup spewer, but I'm taking that back! It's just too good solely for him! I'm hereby gifting it to ALL the DoucheCanoes across the universe! <br /><br />"You're a DoucheCanoe....you're not a DoucheSailBoat, 'cause I enjoy sailboats! So you're a DoucheCanoe!" <br /><br />***Waving*** ℗ ♛ ❥ Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08580762466108671373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-21335641889455146282014-01-28T00:06:11.472-06:002014-01-28T00:06:11.472-06:00careful about reading it too much, it can make you...careful about reading it too much, it can make you ill. I read it through once, and it took days to forget it all. Be kind to yourself, stop now. LOLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-28914611062817397762014-01-27T23:13:23.968-06:002014-01-27T23:13:23.968-06:00All of the suggested 'changes' & '...All of the suggested 'changes' & 're-structuring' is so absurdly bassackwards! <br />I've read it twice today & I simply cannot believe ANYONE could or would support this snit! <br /><br />℗ ♛ <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-51926441162395159382014-01-27T23:05:12.045-06:002014-01-27T23:05:12.045-06:00he came up with this because some of the 'nobo...he came up with this because some of the 'nobodies' have family in jail under felonies which included murder by a co-defendant. This was suggested by the lemmings when he asked for changes to the legal system IIRC.<br /><br />They think it is unfair if you both get charged for the murder that occurs when robbing a store, or kidnapping someone, if you aren't holding the gun. SMHoceansnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-51902020531558891942014-01-27T22:41:59.371-06:002014-01-27T22:41:59.371-06:00Oh, there's sooooooo many #s after 138!!! The ...Oh, there's sooooooo many #s after 138!!! The ones prior to 138 are some facepalmers, too. <br /><br />Ignorantly nauseating. <br /><br />It's a virtual nugget mine over on the Sribd link. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08580762466108671373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-43948365710311403032014-01-27T22:24:44.564-06:002014-01-27T22:24:44.564-06:00Yeah, thanks P ~. And 9:46, very good point.
...Yeah, thanks P ~. And 9:46, very good point. <br /><br />All I could think while reading Bill's statement is, isn't that the job of a jury to decide all these questions and issues? I can't see how the presumption of innocence is thrown to the winds. Bill's lack of faith in law enforcement is also showing. The prosecution of innocent people isn't common enough to convince me that the felony murder rule is misapplied. <br /><br />nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-50343760917533996682014-01-27T21:58:58.248-06:002014-01-27T21:58:58.248-06:001) Oops...this is an --> this is a
2) Note Win...1) Oops...this is an --> this is a<br /><br />2) Note Windsor is asserting all the posters on this and other blogs conspired to harm him and he thus intends to hold each one of them individually and severally libel. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-17192147082213990552014-01-27T21:46:27.068-06:002014-01-27T21:46:27.068-06:00Thanks for posting this Petunia. Windsor's le...Thanks for posting this Petunia. Windsor's legal analysis is deeply ignorant and deeply flawed. What he fails to understand is felony murder gets its underpinnings from vicarious liability doctrine in tort law. <br /><br />"The felony murder rule holds unequally involved parties equally accountable and punishable."<br /><br />This is an profoundly ignorant statement which goes to the very core of Windsor's hypocrisy when one considers he's against felony murder because he considers it inherently inequitable, yet he is attempting to sue EVERY SINGLE PERSON who has posted on this site.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-25442429616604044272014-01-27T21:16:06.355-06:002014-01-27T21:16:06.355-06:00Murder? Here's Bill Windsor's own words r...Murder? Here's Bill Windsor's own words regarding murder. <br /><br />I found this here:<br />http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/146145899/html5<br /><br />William M. Windsor and LawlessAmerica, proposed legislation that will fix many of the problems.<br /><br />138. The felony murder rule shall be abolished. [The felony murder rule operates as a matter of law upon proof of the intent to commit a felony to relieve the prosecution of its burden of proving intent to kill, which is a necessary element of murder. The intention to commit a felony does not equal the intention to kill, nor is the intention to commit a felony, by itself, sufficient to establish a charge of murder. The felony murder rule erodes the relation between criminal liability and moral culpability in that it punishes all homicides in the commission, or attempted commission, of the proscribed felonies, whether intentional, unintentional, or accidental, without proving the relation between the homicide and the perpetrator's state of mind. Under the felony murder rule, the defendant's state of mind is irrelevant. Because intent is a characterization of a particular state of mind with respect to a killing, felony murder bears little resemblance to the offense of murder except in name. First-degree murder is an arbitrary assignment. Holding one or many criminally liable for the bad results of an act which differs greatly from the intended results is based on a concept of culpability which is totally at odds with the general principles of jurisprudence. It is fundamentally unfair and in violation of basic principles of individual criminal culpability to hold one felon liable for the unforeseen and un-agreed to results of another felon's action. The basic rule of culpability is further violated when felony murder is categorized as first-degree murder because all other first-degree murders (carrying equal punishment) require a showing of premeditation, deliberation and willfulness, while felony murder only requires a showing of intent to do the underlying felony. The purpose of creating degrees of murder is to punish with increased severity the more culpable forms of murder, but an accidental killing during the commission or attempted commission of a felony is punished more severely than a second-degree murder. The felony murder rule can be used by prosecutors in a manner so as to cause grossly disproportionate sentencing, depending on the circumstances of each individual case. The felony murder rule is unconstitutional because presumption of innocence is thrown to the winds. The prosecution needs only to prove intent to commit the underlying felony; that done, first degree-murder becomes part and parcel of the underlying felony because intent to commit murder does not have to be proved. The felony murder rule is probably unconstitutional because in some cases it violates the Eighth Amendment: cruel and unusual punishment, grossly disproportionate to the crime(s) actually committed. The felony murder rule holds unequally involved parties equally accountable and punishable. Again, cruel and unusual punishment if you're only the lookout for a robber who happens to kill in the process of the robbery. The felony murder rule violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process because no defense is allowed on the charge of first-degree murder, only the underlying felony. The felony murder rule bears no rational relationship or equity in its two penalties, with the penalties of other murder laws, including, at times, the charge of first-degree murder. <br /><br />℗ ♛ Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08580762466108671373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-49091642583527789222014-01-27T13:24:53.516-06:002014-01-27T13:24:53.516-06:00Drumming up hits to appease his insatiable appetit...Drumming up hits to appease his insatiable appetite for attention.Spamanonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-83562424320153845712014-01-27T10:06:24.726-06:002014-01-27T10:06:24.726-06:00Windsor posted a picture, and wrote a mess of blah...Windsor posted a picture, and wrote a mess of blah, blah, inciting more anti govt. rhetoric and riling up the bored lemmings. One part caught my attention, as did some comments there after. How to incite the SC's... throw in the word "Murder."<br /><br />"Lawless America...The Movie will SHOCK our fellow Americans as most do not have a clue that the government can come in and decide they are no longer the parents of their children.<br /><br /> Please have your friends, enemies, neighbors, co-workers, relatives, and victims everywhere go to www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica and watch some of the horror stories."<br /><br />Ok, knowing Windsor, there are two things I bet he is trying to accomplish here. One, is pulling back the lemmings who had one foot out the door, and who support the other actual documentaries that just came out, (that aren't actually anti-govt) and Two, (the biggie) drumming up business for the "Revolution" by showing one sided stories to angry, anti America Americans. (One minute he says the movie is all but dead, the next he says it will shock and awe you...righty-o-then) <br /><br />Now on to the comments from assorted lemmings. "Stand up to Tyranny," "We all should be outraged," "You are so right Bill," "...so add attempted murder to your criminal violations list of charges!," "We have to do something," and <b>"this is what we do now" http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/</b><br /><br />Ah, there it is. Forget the blah, blah, just find the hot button. "Murder" and the loss of your rights, followed by the call to go watch the videos on YouTube so they can get more members to join their "Lawless America Revolution." That's what this is all about. Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-541719616983513022014-01-26T20:58:46.103-06:002014-01-26T20:58:46.103-06:00Exactly. Someone is going home mad. Now, what will...Exactly. Someone is going home mad. Now, what will these SC's do, when everyone is an SC because they got rid of all the "haters"? They can't all win, they can't even get along out there with their revolution ideas, plots to take over, treason all around. SMDHNinjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-37797889981062167042014-01-26T19:35:03.073-06:002014-01-26T19:35:03.073-06:00Got to thinking about Gingersnap's comments - ...Got to thinking about Gingersnap's comments - I was reminded of this song. When you go to court, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose and sometimes you just settle. That's just the way it works. I agree, it appears these guys didn't emotionally evolve past the 2 year old 'no' stage. <br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_rbjg2k6cI nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-67020690046164968112014-01-26T19:19:40.510-06:002014-01-26T19:19:40.510-06:00For clarity: my post at 4:52 was in response to S...For clarity: my post at 4:52 was in response to Snoozan, who is no longer here. nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-34396987949992416942014-01-26T19:17:00.748-06:002014-01-26T19:17:00.748-06:00Oh, and Angela Stark's connection to Ron Brans...Oh, and Angela Stark's connection to Ron Branson. <br /><br />https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/grandjury/-xNyiPf2ZoE/21n4w9BTyEUJnothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-24346269793835030152014-01-26T18:56:11.438-06:002014-01-26T18:56:11.438-06:00Oh wow. Here's another Lawless America 'n...Oh wow. Here's another Lawless America 'nobody' partnered up with Alfred Adask. Ron Branson - he's the jail4judges guy. <br /><br />http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin<br />archive.cgi?noframes%3Bread=30832<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFI5K-YyuTc<br /><br />Ron advertises his .org on a SovCit site for resources - Adask is listed as is William Duff (Continental Congress 2009), Bob Hurt (court watcher buddy of D. Schied) & Clive Broustred (copper card guy, see March '13 posts). <br /><br />http://www.3wisemenessentials.com/commerce_teachers.htmlnothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-64769183751291961892014-01-26T18:24:51.454-06:002014-01-26T18:24:51.454-06:00Thx, Ninja. Those were fun to watch but I couldn...Thx, Ninja. Those were fun to watch but I couldn't take much of Clayton. <br /><br />Remember Steven Erickson? He was the guy so worried about Bill's disappearance he did a video. Steven follows Bill & Al Adask. In his 'testimony' to Bill: Steven says he's all for citizen grand juries, he seems to think CT cops are killing people and making it look like natural causes. <br /><br />And geez, even Bill's own loyalist see the truth. Steven said this on his blog: "Some people who have contacted Bill Windsor are, and will always be mentally ill."<br /><br />http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2013/12/william-windsor-murdered-or-jailed-for.html<br /><br />http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Legal-Challenge-to-Police-by-Steven-G-Erickson-110920-420.html<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmoNZUzBUb8 <br />nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-45772446180772161412014-01-26T18:14:38.169-06:002014-01-26T18:14:38.169-06:00^^ "ok" ^^^^ "ok" ^^Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-44988288837251860712014-01-26T17:18:04.296-06:002014-01-26T17:18:04.296-06:00Good point, Anon - as the entire blog has been dow...Good point, Anon - as the entire blog has been downloaded (allegedly) and Susan is in Bill's list of haters, he has Susan's posts too. Susan tried to lead a charge for others to post Bill's history so others just tuning in would know the 'truth'. How does she figure she's excluded from Bill's suit? She's excused just because she got mad when nobody wanted to play her game? <br /><br />(Rhetorical questions, Snoozan - not looking for response. In fact, please don't respond. What you have to say doesn't matter.)nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-87561971095613774682014-01-26T17:10:01.306-06:002014-01-26T17:10:01.306-06:00Oh here is part 2 of Clayton. At a little over 2 m...Oh here is part 2 of Clayton. At a little over 2 min, is that David Schied trying to call in? LOL<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypTuadLbZ1oNinjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-12263815599466073862014-01-26T17:04:28.190-06:002014-01-26T17:04:28.190-06:00think you're real ID--> think your real ID...think you're real ID--> think your real IDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-80946976016580285702014-01-26T16:55:47.274-06:002014-01-26T16:55:47.274-06:00Well Snoozan, it amazes me how you can continue to...Well Snoozan, it amazes me how you can continue to laugh your ass off when it's clear your head is so deeply imbedded into it, it's acting like a button through your pelvis cavity. GingerSnap has told you repeatedly to cease and desist from posting here, yet you continue; why is that? By that fact and your own words makes you a CYBERSTALKER and CO-CONSPIRATOR and a ginormous HYPOCRITE. You think you're smart enough to play both sides? Fine.<br />You may just find yourself defending against BOTH sides, especially if Google submits to Windsor's discovery. Seriously, do you really think you're real ID won't be outed and that you're immune to counter-suits?<br />DREAM ON.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-44089580813168073562014-01-26T16:27:51.553-06:002014-01-26T16:27:51.553-06:00There are just so many of these people it's ha...There are just so many of these people it's hard to keep track. But, they all seem to be tied together one way of another. While checking into Rod Class I came across quite a few groups he's associated with, besides Lawless, and cross referencing names with William Windsor or Lawless America, it's quite interesting. <br /><br /> It appears to me now, why Snoozan was all flustered at how Windsor went sideways out the gate, let his ego take over by focusing a bit too much on growing himself, instead of the "Revolution"...(but still jumps in to defend his right to get vexi) is because she still sports the same SC allegiance. Pretty sure she's still wrapped up with the major movement or Revolution of SC's based on her obsession with this blog. Found a woman who could be "Susan Harbison" because she spouts all the same kind of crap. Her name is Angela Stark. <br /><br />Angela has her own talkshoe show called "My private Audio." http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=39904&cmd=tc<br /><br /> She follows and interviews the assorted SC's. Fully supporting their take over she's just waiting for everyone to "wake up". She also has a blog, but don't go there without a proxy, she's tracking IP's. http://www.myprivateaudio.com/ (Oh, and she will also charge you in gold and silver if you take any of her stuff and repost. LOL- feel free to donate to her page too. I didn't see any claim to a non profit, but then again I didn't look) <br /><br />While searching I came across a few people who don't care too much for Angela. One being Clayton R Davis. They had a heated exchange, because she wouldn't post what he wanted, and he said she was too rigid and wanted things her own way. LOL who does that sound like? <br /><br />So, when the SC's all have the same mind frames, but can't even get along with each other, who wins in a civil grand jury? <br /><br />Some more fun SC's to watch include<br />Paula Gloria and her hubby Joe Barton<br />http://www.youtube.com/user/paulagloria/videos<br /><br />Clayton R Douglas<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll4CzHURao0Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-89097943045734142682014-01-26T15:18:24.423-06:002014-01-26T15:18:24.423-06:00^ "just know"^ "just know"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-24718221684834637042014-01-26T14:36:46.459-06:002014-01-26T14:36:46.459-06:00Oh wait...I have heard of Adask before, just didn&...Oh wait...I have heard of Adask before, just didn't connect him to SovCits. I found a law suit Adask vs Adask while researching Bill one day. I was curious about it as appears to be a divorce but Alfred as plaintiff filed a complaint under RICO (no PACER account, so didn't look further for info). <br /><br />Turns out, old Al sued his ex wife, her attorney and judge under RICO for an order of child support. Which he didn't pay and got arrested. <br /><br />http://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txndce/3:2007cv01531/170428<br /><br />Words spoken like a true SovCit in this plea for help:<br /><br />"I'd like the system to know that my situation is being Watched by people all over the country. I'd like the people who are watching my situation to call, fax and or email a question to the sheriff here and this is the question, 'Is it true that the living man, Alfred Adask, is being held as fiduciary for a crime allegedly committed by the person ALFRED ADASK with a DOB of 4/21/45 ?'" <br /><br />http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Alfred-Adask/10847223<br /><br />http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=6459nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.com