tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post5243965986236003502..comments2023-12-15T18:16:43.357-06:00Comments on joeyisalittlekid: Windsor Can't Read During Tax SeasonAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comBlogger133125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-8127196023793091282014-03-21T20:04:09.885-05:002014-03-21T20:04:09.885-05:00Sure go for it. Fist bump from one "Mike"...Sure go for it. Fist bump from one "Mike" to another Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-89526685790954035732014-03-21T19:48:55.564-05:002014-03-21T19:48:55.564-05:00I have been reading here a lot lately, I really li...I have been reading here a lot lately, I really like it, and it has shed huge lights on my dealings with Dorothy and Nancy, thank you so much. And thanks for the kind words in the comments. I wrote a post in my blog about you guys over here :http://zerodinh.wordpress.com/2014/03/21/joeysalittlekid-blog/ hope you don't mind me snipping a few of your comments, if you do, let me know, i'll remove them. Again thanks for the knowledge and the laughs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-79525297513168514762014-03-09T04:10:39.757-05:002014-03-09T04:10:39.757-05:00Ok Susan, this will be the last time I respond to ...Ok Susan, this will be the last time I respond to your snark. If you were even half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't even bother with this blog. It must be such a sad lonely life you lead. To be completely consumed with a bunch of anonymous peoples thoughts about an idiot you worship, how depressing. You can spout off about how it's fun for you to act the way you do but I just don't buy it. You're obviously alone, rejected, and bitter. Good luck with whatever shallow life you do have because it appears to me it is overrun with hate and bitterness. John Tuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00432859248725160168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-82726116083707090722014-03-06T07:40:30.421-06:002014-03-06T07:40:30.421-06:00Seriously Sharon? You don't believe that Judge...Seriously Sharon? You don't believe that Judge Fitzwater could find your good buddy Windsor didn't have a colorable claim, that it is frivolous and meritless and deny leave? Then Judge Carroll has a lawful reason to dismiss? Really? Wow, you are just so hateful towards the fact that you VL types can't manipulate every single aspect of the courts for your "wars". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-88341124323605282622014-03-06T07:35:51.323-06:002014-03-06T07:35:51.323-06:00Sharon, you don't know anything, and your inte...Sharon, you don't know anything, and your interjections about what and why the court do things is...shall we say...is bias. You are just another one of the LA lemming types who believe they know more than the courts and the Judges. Every time you insert your opinion as fact, you make the perfect point at why LA and all the other SC's, Oathkeepers, or whatever radical groups believe they are more knowledgeable than the Judges, will always be a total failure. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-9717198766643935932014-03-06T07:23:00.000-06:002014-03-06T07:23:00.000-06:00Pretty sure Anon @ 12:01 that the Judge who called...Pretty sure Anon @ 12:01 that the Judge who called Windsor that, knows the definition. SMH Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-45046756920302209342014-03-05T19:02:32.865-06:002014-03-05T19:02:32.865-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.John Tuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00432859248725160168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-5216365238780193602014-03-05T10:31:04.971-06:002014-03-05T10:31:04.971-06:00Oh, very good point NBTDT. State courts, just like...Oh, very good point NBTDT. State courts, just like he said. Did he already start his paper terrorism plot? Interesting thought. I believe some of the FB complaints are also pretty much the same too. They conspired with the meanie name callers I believe. <br /><br />Let see, he has/had 3 appeals in MT, and a new Federal case there, CA, TX, MO, and KS. Now where are the sleepers filing? Those underground LA people that stopped publically posting when he went sideways, but still support him. Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-16985449344462122222014-03-05T10:27:39.051-06:002014-03-05T10:27:39.051-06:00yep re: lack of responsibility. I don't have...yep re: lack of responsibility. I don't have a problem with Duffey's description of Bill as "scurrilous and irresponsible". What better word than scurrilous is there for all of those webs sites set up with the names of sitting judges? <br /><br />scur·ril·ous<br />ˈadjective: scurrilous<br /><br /> 1. making or spreading scandalous claims about someone with the intention of damaging their reputation. "a scurrilous attack on his integrity"<br /><br /> synonyms: defamatory, slanderous, libelous, scandalous, insulting, offensive, gross; Morenothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-15865091950470806462014-03-05T10:19:37.803-06:002014-03-05T10:19:37.803-06:00I agree, Ninja. The complaints filed in state co...I agree, Ninja. The complaints filed in state courts also fit the revised agenda - the former leaders shot too high in attacking the Fed, so the new plan is taking over the states one county at a time. <br /><br />It's interesting that the TX, KS and MO complaints are basically the same complaint Bill filed in his motion to recuse Judge Duffey. Everybody said meanie things about him, in his opinion. nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-82546108768628693872014-03-05T10:11:26.408-06:002014-03-05T10:11:26.408-06:00Exactly. He also told them they wouldn't accom...Exactly. He also told them they wouldn't accomplish anything in DC either. How could they, when he didn't go about it correctly? He just wanted the signatures on the packages to make up his "evidence" that they are being ignored. They aren't, he just doesn't want to follow procedures. It doesn't support his entire mission to collect manufactured evidence of "corruption".<br /><br />My understanding of the entire MOM case boils down to the fact that upon a verbal agreement (which doesn't mean anything because Windsor's credibility comes into play) a meeting of the minds did not take place. Windsor was ordered not to sell any more vouchers. He broke the agreement, and continued selling. He was wrong, and thrust the entire debacle into years of wasted time and money. <br /><br />Schied- also broke the law. Point blank, he didn't pull over. He was wrong, but instead of just accepting it, he tried to justify an unjustifiable action. These two examples are simple personally lack of responsibility. Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-7375525031796537462014-03-05T10:03:43.241-06:002014-03-05T10:03:43.241-06:00Thank you.Thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-12955666927608342382014-03-05T10:01:30.006-06:002014-03-05T10:01:30.006-06:00And even scarier - Bill encouraged his followers t...And even scarier - Bill encouraged his followers to copy his examples of pleadings and court docs for their own cases. Has he won in any complaints file Pro Se? <br /><br />Given Snoozan had a point that it's not about winning/losing, it's a "war". And Bill has stated many times that his mission is to file as many complaints as possible to gather evidence of corruption. In fact, he stated he expects to be ignored and/or lose. But with all the criticism of and lack of support for his pleadings, how does anybody with a legitimate case think following his example is a good idea? nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-77078735204413234922014-03-05T09:51:37.297-06:002014-03-05T09:51:37.297-06:00This is where I really believe he wanted to get th...This is where I really believe he wanted to get the giant Judicial Boot. <br />He also filed the Facebook suit without leave. (as well as the KS case) <br />I really believe Windsor wants to lose. That way, he can file yet another ginormous frivolous case- perhaps starting with Thrash, who caused him to lose millions and millions of dollars due to his "Void" and "illegal" order. Perhaps this will be his first case for the selective citizen grand jury he has been planning. <br /><br />It didn't make any sense to me why Windsor would acknowledge the one part of Thrash's order, where he would have to post the 50K if he added Judges to a suit, but ignore the other part that he can't file without leave first. He knows what he's doing. Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-46004900724003915082014-03-05T09:44:36.642-06:002014-03-05T09:44:36.642-06:00Bill has not been declared vexatious in TX, so it ...Bill has not been declared vexatious in TX, so it doesn't appear the TX statute applies. It appears Judge Carroll asked Bill to comply with Judge Thrash's order, which is for Bill to secure permission through Judge Fitzwater to proceed with his complaint. <br /><br />My question is, how long does this case remain open pending Judge Fitzwater's review and ruling? nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-7403180012065286112014-03-05T09:42:36.575-06:002014-03-05T09:42:36.575-06:00I think Windsor does this on purpose personally. I...I think Windsor does this on purpose personally. I believe by reading the voluminous papers he has filed, he always starts out one way, then when what he presents as his evidence doesn't work the way he thought, he starts getting angry, and insulting the court personnel.<br /><br /> Then he loses all sight of reality and goes for the throat by inundating the courts with more meritless and frivolous crap to purposely build up to the great recusal request. All designed to get away from that particular Judge who saw through him in the first place, in hopes of getting another Judge who he can snow. <br /><br />Windsor seems to have a superiority complex. He believes he is always right, and that is where he is wrong. The common denominator in all his hundreds if not thousands of cases and appeals, is him. His anger, hatred, resentments, vindictiveness, maliciousness, etc. blind him. That is the way I see it, the way others who also view his actions see it, and the way Judges seem to also view what he does at the end of the day. Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-72887593074097218312014-03-05T09:38:24.121-06:002014-03-05T09:38:24.121-06:00Bill will never get leave to file from the federal...Bill will never get leave to file from the federal judge in time to save this lawsuit. His attempt to get around the thrash order by giving the judge 2 weeks to respond didn't work. The order says he has to be given leave BEFORE he files. In his haste to punish the joeys for being poopie heads, he jumped the gun and now it's going to bite him on the ass. John Tuttlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00432859248725160168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-57061352131506091152014-03-05T09:31:19.865-06:002014-03-05T09:31:19.865-06:00Per the strictest interpretation of Texas VL statu...Per the strictest interpretation of Texas VL statute Sec. 11.1035, this Texas thing should have been over weeks ago after the first person notified the court of his VL status. Per the second strictest, Windsor had 10 days from the day the judge ruled he had to follow the procedure. That's tomorrow. Discuss?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-47109048321983509582014-03-05T09:03:38.381-06:002014-03-05T09:03:38.381-06:00Bill had to learn the hard way that judges can bec...Bill had to learn the hard way that judges can become angered at one party or the other during the course of the proceedings.....thats perfectly allowable and normal actually. Its only if the judge has a bias against someone BEFORE the proceedings start. Court after court, Bill started to get the feeling that all these judges were annoyed and angered by his antics and he figured that was cause to force them to recuse for bias.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-72156586120545624832014-03-05T08:58:36.868-06:002014-03-05T08:58:36.868-06:00I still don't get why if Alcatraz is Ryan'...I still don't get why if Alcatraz is Ryan's company, Bill got sued and Round America is an interested party. Then Pro Se, Bill filed appeals and motions to reopen the MoM case. This was after Bill signed a negotiated settlement agreement that included a waiver of appeals. <br /><br />At any rate, Bill's Writ of Mandamus looks a lot like the other cases he's filed since then. Re: Judge Duffey - Bill is upset because Duffey was "mean" to him and took issue with his 499 page complaint. Duffey called Bill "scurrilous and irresponsible". Bill thinks statutory requirements and rules of procedure should be waived because he is Pro Se. <br /><br />I was going to copy/paste some points relevant to pending complaints, particularly with regard to serving subpoenas for depositions. But there are way too many interesting points to choose from. <br /><br />These are two of my favorite statements: <br /><br />By the court: <br /><br />Windor's objectivity is subject to question. In his affidavit in support of his motion to recuse, Windsor wrote that he (1) has an "extreme sense of right and wrong" [36 Aff. at 135], (2) has spent "over 2,000" hours on this case [id. at ¶ 148], and (3) has "no job because [he has] to work full-time on the legal work" [id. at ¶ 181].] <br /><br />In Bill's affidavit of Judge Duffey's prejudice: <br /><br />176. I know from reading cases that there are some crazy pro se people out there who file bogus stuff galore. I am not one of those people. I can back up everything. Have a hearing, and I will prove it. <br /><br />https://word.office.live.com/wv/WordView.aspx?FBsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fattachments%2Fdoc_preview.php%3Fmid%3Dmid.1393885083134%253Ad267f4026f61059941%26id%3De530c360b2b8d1018f9da2d58da9d680%26metadata&access_token=100005125140312%3AAQB2ZawS-ovGGdZR&title=petition%20for%20writ%20-%20mandamus%20-%20appendix%20-%20volume%201%20-%202010-10-15nothingbettertodotodayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01550795527547729731noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-38630765025539310672014-03-04T23:34:01.130-06:002014-03-04T23:34:01.130-06:00Sounds about right. That is Windsor's philosop...Sounds about right. That is Windsor's philosophy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-83161886213724228482014-03-04T23:18:03.560-06:002014-03-04T23:18:03.560-06:00I am assuming that since my email was not answered...I am assuming that since my email was not answered by Barbara Windsor the Director of Lawless America Association to make a statement that she is not the owner that per the document I have she is the owner. Interesting eh.Detroit Disney Duohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05380255158899970168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-5754691995425900452014-03-04T22:12:13.516-06:002014-03-04T22:12:13.516-06:00Look at that...defamatory statements by Sharon go ...Look at that...defamatory statements by Sharon go *poof* too! ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-70862217017976406192014-03-04T22:03:37.495-06:002014-03-04T22:03:37.495-06:00*Poof* -- And the Supertroll disappears! Well don...*Poof* -- And the Supertroll disappears! Well done Admin!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-65498744049741869482014-03-04T22:01:42.420-06:002014-03-04T22:01:42.420-06:00You're flat wrong, Sharon--both counts. Now g...You're flat wrong, Sharon--both counts. Now go play with your cats<br /><br />.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com