tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post6810334005145284914..comments2023-12-15T18:16:43.357-06:00Comments on joeyisalittlekid: Total Dram KingAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comBlogger89125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-41710774560804869162013-04-17T19:00:20.132-05:002013-04-17T19:00:20.132-05:00I quite like reading through a post that can make ...I quite like reading through a post that can make people think.<br /><br />Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!<br /><br /><br />My blog <a href="http://www.wiki.chargerbots.info/HanswhGonzalesxo" rel="nofollow">healthy waist to height ratio</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-55166167139252842652013-03-30T22:46:05.903-05:002013-03-30T22:46:05.903-05:00If Allie needs another affidavit from a Windsor vi...If Allie needs another affidavit from a Windsor victim I'd be glad to send her one.<br /><br />C.S.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-6763033007213045662013-03-28T18:49:39.131-05:002013-03-28T18:49:39.131-05:00AHAHAHHHAAAHHHHAAAA I love it Sluggo!!! thank...AHAHAHHHAAAHHHHAAAA I love it Sluggo!!! thank you I needed that today! <3oceansnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-10183882470723845512013-03-28T15:29:23.299-05:002013-03-28T15:29:23.299-05:00For whatever it's worth, though, the State of ...For whatever it's worth, though, the State of Missouri evidently thinks it <b>is</b> a "provable barometer."<br /><br />A clichéd example might be the old "flinch" game, wherein Person X throws what looks like a punch at Person Y, but stops <i>juuust</i> short of actually landing the blow. If Y flinches at the pantomimed punch, X wins; if Y doesn't flinch, Y wins.<br /><br />What X is doing in that situation is "attempt[ing] to place Y in apprehension of immediate physical harm"; in other words, X is trying to get Y to believe that (s)he is about to be physically injured, immediately. That's the whole point of the game.<br /><br />And, again, that's just about exactly what the civil tort of <i>assault</i> is—causing someone to believe that you're about to cause him or her physical harm. (<i>Battery</i>, then, is when you actually connect.)<br /><br />Now, whether either Windsor or Ms. Overstreet actually <i>has</i> attempted to cause the other to believe that (s)he is about to be physically injured is an open question. Missouri courts have apparently been applying this legal standard for (presumably many) years, so if I were arguing this case for either one of them I'd look at previous cases with something like similar facts; incidents involving online harassment would be a key thing to look up.<br /><br />Maybe both protective orders are invalid, because (possibly—I don't know) nothing that's happened between these two has met the legal standard you've quoted. I don't know enough about the Missouri law to say.Attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-91262075155618142842013-03-28T15:06:20.436-05:002013-03-28T15:06:20.436-05:00ok thank you *~* Redd *~*ok thank you *~* Redd *~*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-55128656402852774492013-03-28T14:32:14.878-05:002013-03-28T14:32:14.878-05:00yeah I mean I can see he is trying to meet some ki...yeah I mean I can see he is trying to meet some kind of legal milestone...but the statement itself makes no sense. How could allie attempt to place him in apprehension of physical harm? The word apprehension seems way out of place here, certainly it couldn't be a provable legal barometer<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02942829806487113352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-21183774080988475202013-03-28T14:26:35.590-05:002013-03-28T14:26:35.590-05:00I dunno; it's pretty close to a common definit...I dunno; it's pretty close to a common definition of the civil tort of assault. (Legal gobbledygook can look like nonsense even when it isn't.)<br /><br />I'd bet Windsor borrowed most of that phrase from some protective-order form. In fact, it's probably Missouri's: take a look at http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=537 , and check out page 2, section 8.Attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-24960884019311581562013-03-28T14:18:02.309-05:002013-03-28T14:18:02.309-05:00I have no idea whether Ms. Overstreet's petiti...I have no idea whether Ms. Overstreet's petition "is valid," that is, whether it will be upheld against Windsor's apparent (though more than slightly incoherent) objection—but it's quite clear that it's <b>not</b> necessary for Windsor to be "family or [an] intimate partner" of hers.<br /><br />Once again, it's written right in the text you quoted: "In order to qualify for an order of protection, the <b>petitioner</b> [that's Ms. Overstreet] must be a family member, household member or intimate partner living with or without the respondent, <b>or an adult who has been the victim of stalking.</b>"<br /><br />Ms. Overstreet contends that Windsor has been stalking her. I don't know if that's legally correct (and Windsor obviously thinks it isn't, notwithstanding the fact that he accuses pretty much every person who has ever written an unkind thing about him online of stalking him), but presuming she can convince the judge of that, the fact that Windsor isn't a relative or a boyfriend of hers is not a problem for her petition.<br /><br />I have no idea what's going to happen once Windsor and his circus act make their way into a rural Missouri courtroom. The Missouri judge will have the power to do just about anything (s)he likes with the case. Regardless, I don't see anything <i>self-evidently</i> invalid about the Order for Protection here.Attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-27604975256478778742013-03-28T13:20:19.111-05:002013-03-28T13:20:19.111-05:00Also in the courts where I watch with the DV victi...Also in the courts where I watch with the DV victims these exparte orders are granted if the judge believes their side of the story. Then a short time later a hearing is required to show evidence and let the other party tell their side. So yeah anon it is already granted but it may still be tossed out. I go in with rape victims a lot for these as a person of support. I am not an attorney. I am a tassle twirler. *~* Redd *~*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-47304591170996751362013-03-28T12:29:40.642-05:002013-03-28T12:29:40.642-05:00oops 2-4th paragraphs should have been in quotatio...oops 2-4th paragraphs should have been in quotation marks, those are from a MO website on OFP's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-49422075665639781932013-03-28T12:28:50.332-05:002013-03-28T12:28:50.332-05:00So my biggest question is did Allie ever live with...So my biggest question is did Allie ever live with Bill? Does her volunteering with him qualify her to even apply for this? I have not seen OFP anywhere that is not for family or intimate partner. <br /><br /><br />Petition for Order of Protection: This form is used by a person requesting a full order of protection against another adult (person over the age of 17). A full order of protection prohibits the person who it is issued against from further acts, attempts or threats of abuse or stalking. The petition may request additional relief such as maintenance, child custody, child support and/or visitation. A full order of protection is issued for a specific period of time - at least 180 days but not to exceed one year.<br /><br />In order to qualify for an order of protection, the petitioner must be a family member, household member or intimate partner living with or without the respondent, or an adult who has been the victim of stalking.<br /><br /> A “family or household member” is defined as husband/wife, former husband/wife, adults related by blood or marriage, adults who are presently living together or have lived together in the past, adults who are or have been in a continuing social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature, and adults who have a child or children together regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time.<br /><br />I am glad you see this as valid attorney because I think it will be dismissed. It saddens me to say that, but I am hoping he will be arrested on other charges when he is there. I see this as a dead end.<br />*~* Redd *~*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-88508924080489410632013-03-28T10:03:02.799-05:002013-03-28T10:03:02.799-05:00Loved it Brannon. It's fricken spot on perfect...Loved it Brannon. It's fricken spot on perfect.<br /><br />And if he does put it in now, unless he undergoes a Psych eval, he can't simply say he isn't delusional, and that's proof. And if he does undergo one, it will prove he is. <br /><br />This dude has a dark soul, he's cold and dead inside, and spews evil. I have never witnessed so much twistedness unfold in such a short time. (Still stuck on the Christ Like comment from last night, and he didn't dispute it)Ninjanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-1637741791118541562013-03-28T08:19:54.277-05:002013-03-28T08:19:54.277-05:00Wow, he's actually saying to anyone he "t...Wow, he's actually saying to anyone he "thinks" lies about him , he will post their address? OMG! Posting an address is one thing. Posting an address where children live, along with his lies setting it up as a hate thing where he encourages people to go there, is another thing all together. What an assbag stalker. He's going to get a lot of people in trouble by having them do his dirty work. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-89749535068839488602013-03-28T08:15:15.731-05:002013-03-28T08:15:15.731-05:00Exactly. Posting their address under a protection ...Exactly. Posting their address under a protection order, to people who would have never known they existed, with words to get people to hate them and possibly stalk them, is pretty self explanatory. He is coaxing weirdos to act on his words. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-48364994384885026412013-03-28T07:34:13.329-05:002013-03-28T07:34:13.329-05:00Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday to you! Ha...Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday our beautiful Minister of Alpacaganda. Happy Birthday toooooooooo youuuuuuuuu!<br /><br />~~ Luffs & giggle snorts ~~<br /><br />http://oi46.tinypic.com/6i8f1k.jpg<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xpeami317s<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-tvt0Zgcyc&playnext=1&list=PLA50DCDC52D0E0CF7&feature=results_main<br />yappynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-9924228073121902362013-03-28T06:12:13.753-05:002013-03-28T06:12:13.753-05:00"I rest my case!" hahaha Now he'... "I rest my case!" hahaha Now he's going to modify his order to include how he's not delusional.<br /><br />Did you notice he also insisted no woman ever sat on his lap? Billy, STOP yer lying ole fella! <br /><br />http://oi47.tinypic.com/2cdyjus.jpg<br />yappynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-20752506976230365572013-03-28T03:35:38.739-05:002013-03-28T03:35:38.739-05:00Apparently, yep.
Winston WindsorApparently, yep.<br /><br />Winston WindsorWindsor whispererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01906105271269928166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-63402186750147823722013-03-28T02:40:29.528-05:002013-03-28T02:40:29.528-05:00K, this is a video I just made, prolly one of my b...K, this is a video I just made, prolly one of my better videos<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw5TLGEXbeEBrannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11916043046822244224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-91596891900879711242013-03-28T00:46:00.453-05:002013-03-28T00:46:00.453-05:00That page is seriously looney-tunes.
I promise I ...That page is seriously looney-tunes.<br /><br />I promise I am not "an agent of a foreign power"!<br /><br />I looked up the two cases cited right at the top of the article. Both citations are out-and-out lies.<br /><br />The first quotation (supposedly from the 1957 U.S. Supreme Court case <i>Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners</i>, though the citation provided is wrong) is an utter fabrication; the Supreme Court never wrote what this crackpot claims it wrote in that case. The second cite (<i>Sims v. Ahrens</i>, which he misspells as "Aherns") is a 1925 case from the Supreme Court of Arkansas... and once again, the quotation is totally fabricated. Even if we cared what a court in Little Rock decided almost ninety years ago, it still didn't state what this doof dishonestly claims it did.<br /><br />Idiocy.Attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-26458229156743776002013-03-28T00:33:26.622-05:002013-03-28T00:33:26.622-05:00Er, Anonymous @8:21, I don't see why you think...Er, Anonymous @8:21, I don't see why you think that either the text or the image you posted refutes what I said. The words "temporary restraining order" and the initialism "TRO" are nowhere to be found in either one. However, the phrase "Order for Protection" is in both. Open your eyes: the image you posted has "Order for Protection" as (the last 3/8 of) its <i>title</i>!<br /><br />So it would appear to me that the material you've posted suggests that I'm <i>correct</i>: this is <i>not</i> a TRO, but rather an Order for Protection. That happens to be exactly what the text you posted <i>says</i>. What leads you to believe otherwise?<br /><br />Also, sure--there's nothing terribly hard to understand in the Order text you've quoted. I'm not familiar with the specific Missouri statutes that are cited, but anyone can look those up on the Web very easily. The concepts mentioned in the passage you quoted from the Order are a little obscure, but they're not really all that complicated.Attorneynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-26696867333201355152013-03-27T23:36:05.088-05:002013-03-27T23:36:05.088-05:00Can i get that "to go" Sluggo? Do you t...Can i get that "to go" Sluggo? Do you take paypal? I have a house I want to decorate in Georgia by Friday.<br /><br />Thanks. yapsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-13422319733129689492013-03-27T23:35:06.962-05:002013-03-27T23:35:06.962-05:00Heil our Saviour ~Heil our Saviour ~yapsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-1958116235988778772013-03-27T23:23:21.246-05:002013-03-27T23:23:21.246-05:00IMHO, the above image shows the only CROSS with wh...IMHO, the above image shows the only <b>CROSS</b> with which Windsor will ever be associated!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06137241896557185511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-36615316822583677422013-03-27T23:21:23.404-05:002013-03-27T23:21:23.404-05:00http://i47.tinypic.com/5370jq.jpg<a href="http://i47.tinypic.com/5370jq.jpg" rel="nofollow"><b>http://i47.tinypic.com/5370jq.jpg</b></a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06137241896557185511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8680976493891333356.post-85420206514466162682013-03-27T23:10:00.676-05:002013-03-27T23:10:00.676-05:00Oh no...you mean sending him to the pen would be l...Oh no...you mean sending him to the pen would be like throwing tar baby into the briar patch?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06137241896557185511noreply@blogger.com