Move over Facebook, Bill has a new multi-billion dollar company he wants to sue, yes that's right, its Google. They wouldn't play ball in his Windsor vs. the world fishing expedition so now they must face the fury of his vexatious ways. Proverbs 26:11 comes to mind, "As a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool repeats his folly".
Bill thinks he is entitled to damages from Google for their "intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with contract or business expectancy, tortious interference with a perspective business relationship, conspiracy". Ahhh yes, I guess like FB, google "lured" him in to using their free programs like youtube to peddle his fake movie. And when those pesky "joeys" went and clicked the thumbs down button on his vidoes, Bill suffered embarrassment. This must be what kept Bill from getting funding for his movie. You know, that funding no one ever offered? Therefore Google intentionally, yes he said intentionally, engaged in this act against Bill and why not throw in the word conspiracy while we are at it? Yes, Google teamed up with "the Joeys" to make Bill look stupid. Google has nothing better to do than to figure out ways to harm Bill Windsor all day.
Now this suit is basically Bill vs Google and reality. They won't bait his hook for his fishing trip and with no fish he has no conspiracy or case. The ironic part is his "emotional distress" is just starting for him, wait till he sees what Google will do to him in a court of law while many people are watching. What happens when they point out that Bill is suing FB for the exact same thing? What happens when they point out that he is suing people in multiple states right now for the very same thing with the same damages? That he is a court ordered vexatious litigant? That he is a self-proclaimed public figure? That he tried to blackmail them?
Yeah funny how the worm turns. Bill pushed Google to all his followers because it was the easiest and fastest way to manipulate search engines to spread the "truth" about Judges and any official somebody, anybody accused of being corrupt. Bill even set up web sites for his followers just to say bad things about officials. He even offered to help with domains in the name of officials that anybody wanted to trash.
ReplyDeleteBut now Google is the bad guy because Bill doesn't like what people are saying about him, his revolution or his behavior. And talk about Olympic Conclusion Jumping, (c) Petunia - Bill has a lot of dissenters that never clicked one button on this blog. I guess it's beyond his comprehension that it wasn't a "joey" clicking all those thumb down buttons.
I ❥ when someone uses one of my lowercase c Petunia-isms! © © © © © Especially since it's almost time for the Winter Olympics!
DeleteCan y'all just imagine all giggle snorting that went on with the Google legal team when they read that Billsnit? You know good & well that they hee-haw donkey guffawing!
℗ ♛
Allow me to make your day:
ReplyDeleteSECTION 8. Subchapter C, Chapter 11, Civil Practice and
Remedies Code, is amended by adding Section 11.1035 to read as
follows:
Sec. 11.1035. MISTAKEN FILING. (a) If the clerk
mistakenly files litigation presented, pro se, by a vexatious
litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 without
an order from the appropriate local administrative judge described
by Section 11.102(a), any party may file with the clerk and serve on
the plaintiff and the other parties to the litigation a notice
stating that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant required to
obtain permission under Section 11.102 to file litigation.
(b) Not later than the 24th hour after receiving notice that
a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order under Section
11.101 has filed, pro se, litigation without obtaining an order
from the appropriate local administrative judge described by
Section 11.102(a), the clerk shall notify the court that the
litigation was mistakenly filed. On receiving notice from the
clerk, the court shall immediately stay the litigation and shall
dismiss the litigation unless the plaintiff, not later than the
10th day after the date the notice is filed, obtains an order from
the appropriate local administrative judge described by Section
11.102(a) permitting the filing of the litigation.
(c) An order dismissing litigation that was mistakenly
filed by a clerk may not be appealed.
PS Google has been apprised of Thrash's order. You're welcome.
ahhh but you see Bill has declared that order void, and he has chosen to ignore it.
DeleteNow that I'm a named party along with Google and Facebook, all my nerdy friends are in awe...I've finally got me some GEEK CRED!
Deletelol@ geek cred. Bill wanted to start a movement...and in the end he did, just not the kind he wanted
DeleteI heart @GEEK CRED! waving~
Delete℗ ♛
Note the statute section (above) was signed into law in Texas as SB 1630 on June 14, 2013. One would think Billy would have shopped for a more "suitable" venue, ie, a state with a less vigorous statute against vexatious litigation, but no...seems Billy's about to be hoisted by his own petard. Poor Billy.
DeleteBill vs Reality. I like it.
Delete<-----yup, eyes still shut tight, fingers crossed.
Dang it...today is wash day for me, and I accidentally just washed a pricey pair of gloves. Guess I'm going to be wearing a pair of cold, wet gloves for most of the day trying to avoid the OJ effect...
DeleteAnd you called me hostile. I'm direct and sometimes blunt, you are hostile. Why do you attack everybody? Even Bill doesn't understand Thrash's order, or didn't until recently.
DeleteMaybe Bill should sue Thrash. Oh wait...he already tried that.
And Snoozan is gone...
DeleteNo, she's never gone, she's much like a fungus in a garbage heap (she has been discarded), she's always lurking, festering and spreading unpleasantness in the dark of night.
Delete℗ ♛
Morning Hagatha, uh, I mean Snoozie.
Delete4:50am? Go lay down! You been spinning for hours. It's draining your venom, you're not spewing nearly as much vomitrocious as you were before you went back your 'Willy'. Cheering him on is obviously exhausting for you. Just rest & drink plenty of fluids.
℗ ♛
OK, after I posted about the attempt to hack into my account, I heard from 2 other people that post here saying they also had hacking attempts over night.
ReplyDeleteFor whomever is harassing certain individuals that post here, I'll save you some time and effort. Here's what you won't find if you do manage to get in: e-mail addresses, phone numbers, legal names or any other identifying information on any person that posts here under a screen name. Here's what you will find: information that is already known to anyone who reads the blog.
So unless you get off causing password issues or making people hear a bunch of notifiers, please give it a rest and find something constructive to do with your life.
NB,
DeleteYou forgot to add...unless you get off spending the next 10 years playing house (as the bottom half) with a bunch of HIV-positive inmates in a federal penitentiary ...
Funny, the contributors on Quatloos! have commented similarly about Windsor and his activities. He didn't sue any of those John Does. He went on the blog to defend himself.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=7690&sid=68cbccb151294e2fcdd21799d6342293&start=20
Delete
DeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby william_M_windsor » Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:57 am
The posts here are about me. Folks, I am a fairly normal 63-year-old grandfather. I spent my entire career as a corporate President and CEO. I became involved in a lawsuit because some crooks in Niagara Falls apparently became afraid that I would discover that they had committed massive fraud. This all caused me to discover that the federal courts in Georgia are hopelessly corrupt, and I am fighting them every way I can. If that makes me a nutjob, then I am proud to be a nutjob.
Sadly, I don’t see many facts … a host of false statements and misinformation. I am not familiar with this forum. If it is something like The Onion where everything is a joke, I apologize. I am assuming these are real statements by people with their own agendas or who don’t know any better.
So, here goes. First, this case is about the corruption in Fulton County that blocks citizens from presenting complaints about criminal acts by government officials in Fulton County Georgia. The complete Verified Complaint is here -- http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=488:judge-jerry-w-baxter-sets-october-7-2011-hearing-on-windsors&catid=120:news-reports&Itemid=222
I am not a sovereign. I am simply a person who discovered that the federal courts in Georgia are a criminal racketeering enterprise, and I have massive proof.
DeleteI am not a vexatious litigant – merely someone fighting against all odds against a corrupt system.
The right to bid on the boat tours is a secondary issue that came after the criminal acts began. It’s too long a story to get into, but the basic story is that I was sued in August 2005 by Maid of the Mist in a 50-paragraph sworn, verified complaint that was completely, entirely false. Every paragraph. In depositions, the three senior managers admitted that everything in the lawsuit was false. The judge ignored it all (in my opinion, because she was bribed by someone). She found that I did not violate the sole cause of action, but she ordered me to pay $450,000 in legal fees for fighting the lawsuit (as a defendant). The judge is as corrupt as they get. There is no law that enables a person to be found liable for legal fees when they were found to have committed no violation as to any cause of action. It was several years later after over $1 million in legal fees were paid) that I discovered that Maid of the Mist was involved in obtaining $2.5 BILLION dollars in government contracts in Ontario and New York without any competitive bidding and with a lot of fraud. I, and several other people, began fighting that, and we won. The winning bidder will be announced this month.
I haven’t thrown a two-country temper tantrum. I have fought the crooks. I won in Canada, and it was front page news for months. There, crooks have been removed from office. Hundreds of articles about all of this are in the “News” section of http://www.NiagaraFallsBid.net I became involved in this in 2008.
The hearing is NOT because he filed TROs against most of the judges in Fulton County. I filed no TRO against any judge in Fulton County. Read the Complaint; it’s quite specific.
I am not a shambling pile of bovine excrement, but I would love to meet face-to-face with the spineless piece of human garbage that would say such a thing.
I hope the hearing is being held to do something valid against the wrongdoing; time will tell. No one will be slapping me down. The judge decided to set a hearing after reading the complaint; I didn’t even request a hearing.
DeleteI’ve never filed any liens and never would.
I am fighting for court reform. I believe I have accomplished quite a bit in the last year. I will continue to fight. A group of people and I have come up with the changes we would like to see made at the state level -- http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=212:ideas-for-state-legislation-to-deal-with-judicial-and-government-dishonesty-and-corruption&catid=104:initiatives&Itemid=105
Alcatraz Media is owned by my son. I didn’t drag Alcatraz Media into anything. The stupidity of the people who have posted here is absolutely mind-boggling.
I am not seeking a TRO against a federal judge in Windsor v. Fulton County. Those who post here don't even have the ability to read or spell, it seems. However, anyone who commits a crime in Fulton County, Georgia is subject to Georgia laws and county courts where they committed the crimes. A federal judge is no different from a plumber; all that matters is where they committed the crimes. And Fulton County is the correct venue for actions against anyone in Fulton County on a civil matter involving Georgia law.
I am neither a "sovrun" nor a "nutjob," but anyone who claims I am is a liar at best and probably far worse. I am not a promoter. I’ve never accepted a dime from anyone, and I spend many hours every week trying to help people.
My blog is hosted on GoDaddy.com. They don’t have any Commodore 64’s. Check your ISP, Dude.
If you believe what any federal judge in Georgia ever writes, then you don't have the sense God gave a turnip. When you read things like these judges have said in orders about me, you should understand that they are corrupt criminals. I am not vexatious, and I have never filed anything frivolous. I do appeal everything that I can appeal. I appeal early and often, and I use the appeals to supplement the proof that I have of the corruption.
From 2008 to the present, there has never been a single sworn statement or document filed to dispute anything that I have filed. Nothing. Yet the judges make fact findings against me. Explain that one, you dimwits.
Then permanent injunction issued against me is by a DEFENDANT judge. It was issued in violation of every form of due process known to man.
Check http://www.LawlessAmerica.com next week to see what happens at the hearing.
There is no rift in my family. I have never threatened violence to anyone, and I have never done anything even remotely unhinged. What a pathetic group of people you all seem to be.
I never tried to convince a court that having my wife sign a Power of Attorney meant that I could legally represent her in court. I sought only to have a court declare whether the model power of attorney form in Georgia is valid or not as it provides that I could assist my ill wife with her response to a document subpoena; she was not a party in any court. Search for Georgia Model Power of Attorney and the Georgia statute, and you will see that it grants the rights to assist someone with legal matters.
I am not an incredibly self-centered, self-important personality type who doesn't give any credence to anyone's opinion but his own. I can prove everything. If anyone ever wants to know the truth, just email me at bill@LawlessAmerica.com. I can send links to just about anything.
william_M_windsor
Windsor said, "I am not seeking a TRO against a federal judge in Windsor v. Fulton County. Those who post here don't even have the ability to read or spell, it seems." AND " I filed no TRO against any judge in Fulton County. Read the Complaint; it’s quite specific."
DeleteIt's always interesting to see when he tells people to check facts, he always directs them to his own websites, or articles he contributed to.
Ok...
"William M. Windsor, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and injunction in this diversity action, 28 U.S.C. § 1332
http://www.leagle.com/decision/in%20fco%2020100520116
ROTF - thx, Ninja.
DeleteNope, I sure didn't. Could it be because that one I published was the appeal to the other case? Or could it be because the only Appeal Windsor has in the world is the kind in a court? He did file for TRO's against Judges and others did he not? He did say that he didn't did he not? Semantics?? No pie for you!
DeleteOh, you're right Ninja, I am so stupid. I'm sorry. Look, Bill's and my good friend Don Mashak posted this, I must be losing my mind. lol
Delete"The big news is that Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter has set an October 7 hearing in Atlanta on Mr. Windsor's motion for a temporary restraining order against Fulton County, the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office, and Fulton County Sheriff’s Deputies -- "
Don also points out what we were attempting with the case.
"This lawsuit is all about getting a declaratory judgment and injunction that will stop anyone in Georgia from interfering with a citizen’s right to present criminal charges to a grand jury."
http://wethepeopletar.blogspot.com/2011/10/llawlessamerica-news-exciting-news.html
^^^^ This is not me posting. All you GENII know I'd never admit to being wrong. Oh Willy, please reconsider letting me come back. I promise I'll be the best ass kissing lemming ever!!
DeleteIf you're going to post using my name at least get it right!!
DeleteNope. I only answer to Robert.
DeleteI'm glad to see you commenting Susan. I really enjoyed the comments you left on my Legal Defensd Fund page. I would love to take you up on your offer to begin dating me. Of course you will have to come to Michigan because I'm not really able to travel to Maryland right now. Please remember to bring cash because I tend to forget my wallet when I'm out with the ladies. But don't you worry, I did manage to get some generic Viagra so all those needs you told me about will get taken care of. And no I really don't mind you're a man posing as a woman.
DeleteThe folks on Quatloos! saw the same things folks here were watching:
ReplyDeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby Constance » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:33 am
You guys would probably be interested in what this guy has been up to. There was mention of sovereign citizen, well now he's planning on starting his own political party and holding his only trials against judges and other elected officials. He's was on a road trip where he "drove" to "all 50 states" getting testimony from people regarding corruption. He's going to take DVDs of testimony to Congress, and he's planning on making a movie that he says will be seen at Sundance, theaters, netflix, blockbuster etc. Too bad it looks like he's picking fights with other facebook groups and getting himself temporarily suspended from facebook. There seems to be some crazy theories and a lot of fighting going on even just within his group. It's worth taking another look at what he has evolved into.
DeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby notorial dissent » Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:20 am
I kind of figured the old windbag would have been in jail by now, considering the problems he was in the middle of the last time we really heard anything from/about him. Looks like he has picked up a whole new passel of "enemies" and "detractors" as he puts it, so still same old charmer he always was. I would say he is still having problems with the legal system judging by the various rants and proposals he has posted.
DeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby ashlynne39 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:09 am
Because of my job, I watch anti-guardianship websites and Bill Windsor has been a great subject on these sites over the last year. He has been traveling around the country taking video testimony of corruption in the courts. I won't say that there is never corruption in the courts but I am familiar with some of the Texas cases he has filmed about and they are basically hokum. In any case, he is now preparing to bring criminal charges against "every corrupt government official in America" starting with the judge that threw him out on his ear over his own ridiculous case. Here is a link to the story and a bit of it quoted that I found interesting. Looks like he will be convening citizen grand juries all over the place and to top President Timmy's letters to the governors, Billy has written letters to everyone in congress (portions of the letter in the quoted portion below. Enjoy . . .
DeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby ashlynne39 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:01 am
Perhaps Hovind can get Windsor to take up his cause. I think they are from the same general area. I find it crazy that Windsor has such backing for his movie. From what I can gather he's filmed 1000s of testimonials and most of them deal with family law, guardianship and cps cases. Some of the issues may be legitimate and I know the anti guardianship groups are serious in their mission and do sometimes have a point but they keep making the mistake of hitching their wagon to cases without merit and to losers like Windsor who only bring down the purpose of their group.
DeleteRe: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al
Postby ashlynne39 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:41 am
notorial dissent wrote:I'd wondered what this old crock was up to after he got bounced out of the GA courts, was it just last year??? I can't decide if he is just crazy or what it is, but he is a thoroughly nasty individual from what I have seen, and it is always someone else's fault for what happens to him, he is never in the wrong. I had kind of hoped he was yesterday's news, but I guess no such luck.
Windsor has quite the following these days. It is sad really. I've listened to some of the testimony he's taped on some of the cases I'm familiar with from Texas. There is a good reson in those cases why the individual was taken from their family and made a ward of the state or given a private guardian. The family members can't accept that . . . If they could understand why then they likely wouldn't have lost guardianship in the first place. But Windsor is giving these people false hope. He's a nut in his own right with his ridiculous pro se lawsuits but this whole Lawless America thing is just really disgusting and misleading. He's traveling across the country taking testimony from these folks and telling them he's going to present it to congress and things will change for them. If you read any of their comments about him its like a little cult following where Windsor is going to save them all and win America back by punishing the evil government workers who wronged them. I guess I'm included in that group that is about to be arrested since I work for the government in one of the areas he's targeting.
Bwahahaha! Not just the 'joeys'? Nooooooo! You mean there's literally 1,000s of other Does?
DeleteI think I missed a few vexi volumes, or were Twitter, InstaGram, SnapChat & TinyPic omitted from the filings? Overlooked? Forgotten?
℗ ♛
Doe's 1-1000 is his fav! Check out this site, (bottom to top)
Delete"COMPLAINT against SIGMUND R. ADAMS, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, CARL HUGO ANDERSON, JR, JULIE E. CARNES, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTIVES, JOHN CONYERS, DOES 1 TO 1000, JOEL F. DUBINA, WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR, ORINDA D. EVANS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, HAWKINS & PARNELL, ERIC H. HOLDER, GREGORY JONES, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, PATRICK J. LEAHY, MAID OF THE MIST CORPORATION, MAID OF THE MIST STEAMBOAT COMPANY LTD., GENTRY SHELNUTT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, SALLY QUILLIAN YATES "
http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/index.html?id=2366328
This is fun, here are Windsor's own words about the suits. Gotta love his Google search engine monopoly game. He titled his article "Georgia Judges are charged with Criminal Action"
Delete"Candidate for Judge files Criminal Charges against Members of Judicial Council of Georgia"
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=12&ved=0CCYQFjABOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.orlytaitzesq.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F02%2FCriminal-complaint-filed-against-GA-judges.pdf&ei=yQzxUuG8K4jmoASVvIGADw&usg=AFQjCNEvqDoQLPtvsAhPcEb0TcA4iIrn7A&bvm=bv.60444564,d.cGU
exactly, he tried to manipulate reality (in the internet world) but the truth came through and now he is hell bent on stamping it out.
DeleteI just imagined him as a "Dora the Explorer" cartoon character, complete with backpack & all, exclaiming "Fuego! Fuego!"
Delete*backpack for travels while 'driving to all 50 states'*
**waving to those folks over at Quantaloos! What up y'all! Ha! Who'd have thought there'd be cross pollinators among those that dared disagree with Vexi?**
bwahahahahahahahahaha giggle snicker snort hiccup!
Thank you Nothing & Ninja! Excellent reading!
℗ ♛
Can you prove the statements you have found were not made by someone already named in a complaint filed in another state?
DeleteIf you are going to paint every individual here with the same brush, don't forget to brush yourself.
Dang. Snoozan is gone again.
DeleteSusan has been permanently enjoined from having an opinion on here....she can have one any where else, but she no longer has one on here. Judge Ginger Snap has ruled
DeleteOh Snap!
DeleteShe'll prolly tattle to Big Vexi on you & he'll copy & paste a lawsuit on her butthurt behalf.
Is it just me, or has Snoozie really lost her zest since her ALL CAPS meltdown? And look at the time, too! The keeper of the crypt that she is, out while it's still daylight! Or? Just circling like a vulture, continuously! Yikes!
Waves at Snoozie~ ~ ~
℗ ♛
I think Bill is a vexi pervert who's absolutely clueless. He wants to sue anyone he thinks might have a nickel in his pocket. He also must be gay because I tried to have sex with him numerous times and he refused me.
DeleteBwahahaha!!!!! It's triple shot Tuesday!!!!
DeleteSnort!
Oh my sweet Willy. If only you had seen my brilliant legal mind!! We could have sued the world together. Instead you wanted to eat pie and go it alone. I'll never be able to get you out of my mind. And now I'm owned by a cookie and it's all your fault!! Willy you're a complete idiot for passing me by!!
DeleteHip, hip, hooray! for Judge Gingersnap!
DeleteWe can hope Susan is gone for good, back to her party of one blog. Thanks Ginger!
DeleteKum-ba-yah, kum-ba-yah
ReplyDeleteI was gonna ask for a Mike's to commemorate that confessional from above, but that'll just bring Nancy outta hibernation! She'll think we're paging her ex!
Bwahahaha!!!!
DeleteI'll hum along wif you! & take a Mike's! Tuesday is looking up~
I was going to have a "Let's Get Harry" film fest this eve, then I thought the better of it for fear of Billy charging me of yet another tort--exposing what he doesn't keep (hair) under his dirty and faded Lawless America cap.
DeleteI guess Marty wasn't lying when he said he WAS LAWLESS AMERICA and Bill was just his front man. Now he's negotiating with people to let them out of the lawsuit.
ReplyDeleteMarty Prehn aka THE ELDER AVENGERFebruary 4, 2014 at 5:50 PM
Meg it was very simple. Curtis Butler contacted me and told me and asked if I can get him a deal and not get prosecuted if he told Bill Windsor everything that he knows about you. Which photo should the news story show? You with your daughter at the Plano, Police Station or the one with the other people from the Occupy movement or the one that was taken at the hotel in Colorado when you complained about the smell in the hotel room and they switched your room several times and then you decided that you were going to sleep in the lobby and thats when the police were called in. Watch for the TMVZ blob page that lists all of the court cases that you have been involved in and all of the news articles and pictures of you from Kindergarten to your High School graduation. OH WHEN THE SAINTS COME MARCHING IN. I WANT TO BE A PART OF THAT NUMBER WHEN THE SAINTS GO MARCHING IN and say Megan Van Elfden you have the right to remain silient as anything you say or text may be used against you in a court of law. Do you understand these rights? Opps too late the screen shot has already been taken.
Yup. Aagent DouchePontoon. So, he's 2nd in command as I am reading his blather. In addition to 'intel' gathering using his special Aagent skills.
DeleteJust when you think that leaky vessel can't sink any lower, it does.
So how can Windsor send out the Mongmoose, to harass people and post completely defamatory libelous crap, yet whine about people who post Bill's own words with their opinions? What is up with that?
DeleteThat?
DeleteIs the Lawless America way.
All his post slandering someone start with "Bill Windsor here is the info you wanted". You'd think that couldn't benefit Bill in court.
DeleteNinja- You better little c Mangmoose!! I'm going to steal it otherwise.
DeleteLOL!! I will share with you. I ran over and trademarked it too.
DeleteI'm up!! Here, wear the ♛ & ccccccccccc © that! Mangmoose is 'nicer' than douche canoe/pontoon, except to the moose.
Delete℗
"Vexatious litigation includes continuing a lawsuit after discovery of the facts shows it has absolutely no merit. Upon judgment for the defendant, he/she has the right to file a suit for "malicious prosecution" against the original vexatious plaintiff. Moreover, most states allow a judge to penalize a plaintiff and his/her attorney for filing or continuing a "frivolous" legal action with sanctions (money award to the defendant for the trouble and/or attorney fees). "
ReplyDeleteIf he pissed off Google and the judge sufficiently, I wonder how much $$ they could get, I assume the attorneys are well paid at Google or whatever firms they use. That's just assuming that Bill's case is without merit.....
I was reading the Facebook Lawsuit, and this one part is so laughable.
ReplyDelete"As a result, years of information is lost along with over 50,000 followers who had registered with the page, and the promotion of the movie was effectively ended. This violates a number of laws."
Windsor didn't have that page for years, he had to convert pages because he was using the wrong type of page to begin with, per FB TOS. He admitted he had the wrong page, when he was explaining to everyone about the conversion, and said he understood they might lose people and information in the transition. Here is one post about the conversion, made a year ago.
"February 11, 2013.
LAWLESS AMERICA FACEBOOK PAGE IS BEING CONVERTED TO A FAN PAGE. PAGE WILL NOT BE ONLINE UNTIL THIS IS COMPLETE. SO POST EVERYTHING HERE -- https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1
We've been trying to make this change for over a month, and we finally have to go a different way.
Ok, so he didn't lose "years" of information for starters, and the suspicious FB likes that jumped in thousand increments, should be fairly easy for FB to track where they came from and how. People didn't "Register" they clicked the "like" button, or were farmed in. The other part of why his page was deleted, well, that will just be funny to see proven another lie, in a court document.
And, whether or not he paid for or someone else paid for those fake followers, Bill had almost a daily hype piece about the additional new followers in a way to generate excitement and gain more real members. He intentionally and directly tried to profit off the scam.
DeleteExcellent post, Anon 9:41. Windsor doesn't think a half truth is a WHOLE LIE...BUT IT IS!
DeleteFurthermore, both Barbara (ex wife) and Ryan (son) are directly tied to Lawless America. While Barbara signed the "donation" checks, Ryan provided IT assets and personnel to maintain and administer them.
Deleteummmm
ReplyDeleteAnon 11:36, Are you doubting or meditating?
DeleteI'm sure the "Special Agent" will get Joey released soon!
ReplyDeleteMarty Prehn shared a link.
30 minutes ago ·
Bill Windsor here is the connection with Megan to Joey Dauben and her reasons for getting him arrested on child molestation charges of which it appears that he may have be set up and prosecuted for crimes that he never committed. All of this information is now being reviewed by the Texas State Attorney General and the Prosecuting Attorney's office from Plano, Texas.
was my comment removed?
ReplyDeleteI am being accused of writing this blog, so please some help. my email is zerodinh@rocketmail.com if someone can fill me in on why I was sent this link by nancy evans figat and now why she is saying i am the writer of this blog. i don't have any idea whta this blog is or about. so please, anyone who can help me out. fill me in on why this nancy person would want to connect me to this blog.
Delete