http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQSW2nlhL-E&list=UUi_3bMXuLoFtRf3Od_HGVJg
Sean Fleming, of course from the Sean Fleming Show, has another great video where he shows the direct deception that Bill has engaged in. As Sean points out, most scam artists choose the State of Delaware to incorporate their organization because it gives them a year to report specific information. Well its been over a year now since LA was incorporated, and guess what? No annual filings have been done as required by law.
Sean then goes on to discuss the Barbara Windsor connection as she is the only named director of Lawless America. She claims in her divorce filings that she never had anything to do with LA, and then reiterates it in a recent email to Sean (or at least from an address appearing to be from Barb as it sounded very Bill-like in its response). Bill is also putting Barbara right in the middle of every single one of his frivolousness lawsuits right now as he lists her divorcing him as one of the reasons he is due damages. She also knows full well why Bill can't speak to his granddaughters and it has nothing to do with some blog How much longer can she do the Windsor thing and hide from her obligations? Will she forever be known as Mrs. Bill Windsor, or will she finally stand up to Bill and his lies and tell the truth?
Very interesting information, that raises some great questions. I now wonder if when certain people were used by Windsor, to gain supporters and donors from, if the real reason they were called "haters" and kicked to the curb upon asking about the "money" issues is for two reasons. One, back in the beginning there was no Lawless Entity per Bill, and two, no one questions the Windsor finances. Ever. Is this a type of over-compensating to divert attention from the clear taboo subject?
ReplyDelete"When Bill Windsor began asking Roxanne Grinage and her clients, collaborators and prospective clients to be in his Lawless America The Movie Project Roxanne Grinage posed several questions to Bill Windsor appropriate for any manager or performance or work product contribution to ask about: fair recognition, fair compensation, revenue share, fiscal responsibility, written release terms, security of data he was gathering on each participant, etc.
Bill Windsor responded to accountability questions with rage, as though the people he was soliciting work product contribution and extremely sensitive information from, had no right to ask him about who was paying for the production of the movie, why was Bill Windsor asking for sensitive information about people’s employers claiming he needed the information to contact them and how was Bill Windsor going to account for the security of the sensitive data he was gathering which included people’s family members names and locations?"
"All the plantation slave owner came up out of Bill Windsor when I asked him in writing to account for where the money is coming from for his film radio TV and movie productions, not to mention a fifty states road trip. Bill, will your production team also drive to Hawaii and Alaska?
Why doesn’t Bill Windsor think he should be held accountable to answer in written release terms and conditions to the contributors of a revenue generating project of this size, especially since he is a chief magisterial judge and congressional representative candidate?"
http://www.hirelyrics.org/administrativesolutionsdefamation.html#.UyhdLhXn9jo
Oh wow look at this:
ReplyDeletejudgebobcarroll.com
Connected sites Visit site
YouTube
USGovCorruption (19 others)
lawlessamerica (21 others)
...
Email
Bill@LawlessAmerica.com (17 others)
Fax
+1.7705781057 (150 others)
Name
B. Windsor ( nobodies@att.net (65 others)
B. Windsor () (35 others)
The Windsor Companies (257 others)
Other
Barbara Windsor () (254 others)
3924 Lower Roswell Road (150 others)
Phone
+1.7705781094 (154 others)
Address
Barbara Windsor (bill@billwindsor.com) (131 others)
Marietta, GA 30068 (592 others)
3924 Lower Roswell Road (131 others)
Email
nobodies@att.net (65 others)
bill@billwindsor.com (297 others)
...
breachedjustice.org (23 others), carlhugoanderson.com (21 others), citizensjustice.com (29 others), conpats.blogspot.com (27 others), donmashaksmn10judicialdistrictfreepre.blogspot.com (24 others), evilesq.com (29 others), free-edgar-steele.com (42 others), getagripamerica.us (28 others), honestgovernmentofficials.com (16 others), human-rights-alert.blogspot.com (27 others), inproperinla.blogspot.com (25 others), iviewit.tv (70 others), jamesnhatten.com (15 others), judgeamytotenberg.com (15 others), judgegailstusan.com (12 others), judgejerrywbaxter.com (20 others), judgekennedyresign.com (24 others), judgeorindadevans.com (19 others), judgethomaswthrash.com (20 others), judgewatch.org (62 others), judgewilliamsduffey.com (22 others), judicial-corruption.net (32 others), larryhohol.com (20 others), lawlessamerica.com (107 others), licensetosqueal.blogspot.com (22 others), montgomerymaryland.wordpress.com (22 others), outlawjudges.org (25 others), parentadvocates.org (33 others), powercorruptsagain.com (26 others), rodclass.com (19 others), stopguardianabuse.org (46 others), supremeabuse.com (25 others), theluzernecountyrailroad.com (33 others), toxicjustice.com (26 others), wordpress.com (19 others), www.a-justcause.com (18 others), www.attorneycorruption.com (30 others), www.bankruptcycorruption.com (44 others), www.breachedjustice.org (22 others), www.carlhugoanderson.com (20 others), www.citizensjustice.com (27 others), www.corruptjudges.org (19 others), www.deniedpatent.com (37 others), www.dontsaveyourmoney.com (17 others), www.dorisldowns.com (17 others), www.ethicscomplaint.com (51 others), www.exposecourtcorruption.com (19 others), www.free-edgar-steele.com (40 others), www.fultoncountygeorgia.net (18 others), www.getagripamerica.us (25 others), www.guardianshipgonebad.com (23 others), www.honestgovernmentofficials.com (18 others), www.industrywhistleblower.com (53 others), www.investigativeblogger.com (55 others), www.jamesnhatten.com (18 others), www.judgeadelepgrubbs.com (14 others), www.judgeamytotenberg.com (18 others), www.judgebobcarroll.com (17 others), www.judgechristopherbrasher.com (17 others), www.judgeconstancerussell.com (17 others), www.judgedaphnewalker.com (17 others), www.judgedavidpdarden.com (17 others), www.judgeevanscomplaint.com (20 others), www.judgegailstusan.com (13 others), www.judgegregwilhelm.com (17 others), www.judgejerrywbaxter.com (20 others), www.judgejohnbsumner.com (17 others), www.judgejohnccarbo.com (17 others), www.judgekellylee.com (18 others), www.judgekennedyresign.com (22 others), www.judgeorindadevans.com (18 others), www.judgerichardjleon.com (18 others), www.judgeroyalfurgeson.com (17 others), www.judgestaceyjernigan.com (16 others), www.judgesusanhblack.com (17 others), www.judgethomaswthrash.com (20 others), www.judgewatch.org (31 others), www.judgeweldonscopeland.com (18 others), www.judgewilliamsduffey.com (20 others), www.judicialaccountabilityinstitute.com (19 others), www.judicialhellhole.com (21 others), www.judicialracketeering.com (17 others), www.larryhohol.com (18 others), www.lawlessamerica.com (85 others), www.licensetosqueal.blogspot.com (20 others), www.liquidatingtrustee.com (20 others), www.montanajudicial.com (18 others), www.obsidianfinancesucks.com (38 others), www.operationrest.org (25
JudgeBobCarroll.com redirects to PeopleSmart.com people finder site. JudgeWilliamSDuffey.com and JudgeThomasWThrash.com are both registered to Plesk, not setup yet.
DeleteThe sites for Carroll, Wilhelm, Ferguson and Jernigan aren't set up because McDermott & Margetis were supposed to do the work once the domain names were purchased. This was all discussed in several Talkshoe's.
Deleteif you go here: http://netcomber.com/ and put in any of the domain names listed above you can find some more info on em, have fun
ReplyDeleteVery cool. So, Barbara and Ryan are tied into Lawless America one way or another. Alcatraz hosted and or still hosts many of the domains. Bill claimed Ryan ceased to run Alcatraz Media, but did he, or did Bill just claim that, like he and Barbara are claiming she has and had nothing to do with Lawless America Association?
DeleteDamn.
DeleteThat internet!! Really has a very long memory! And far more accurate than Big Vexi's!
Wow!
It doesn't make much sense that Ryan Windsor has no idea that his father has purchased domain names using the names of all these people with Alcatraz Media as the host. (whether he moved some now or not, they were purchased using that company.)
DeleteIt pretty much stains anything Alcatraz related for him. The Alcatraz tickets, Reserve 123, ZZ tours, etc. Ryan is either a stupid boy or he knows what his daddy has been doing. How could he not know? It's his company. It stinks just like the ticket scam they have going. Charging people for things without fully explaining the terms. How many complaints against Alcatraz Tickets, and Alcatraz media are out there? Tons.
Windsor is still listed as the admin of the Alcatraz Tickets on their Facebook page, which shows a direct conflict in what he has submitted to the courts, that his family has disowned him completely. It is looking more and more like the entire William M Windsor family are domain hoarders.
As Sean points out, most scam artists choose the State of Delaware to incorporate their organization because it gives them a year to report specific information.
ReplyDeleteFor context, registering in Delaware is certainly not something that only scam companies do. There are many thousands of perfectly legitimate corporations that are incorporated in Delaware—to take advantage of generally pro-corporate (and also well-examined and clear) laws in that state. Delaware incorporation is definitely not a serious indication that a particular company should be suspected of illegal behavior.
It isn't evidence of the opposite, either, of course.
I understand it might be a good state to incorporate in but at the the same time because of the laxative rules such as not having to report much about your corporation or being able to use a P.O.box address for a year etc. it becomes the place for people who want to file and abuse what maybe was derived to be easier for incorporating and doing business in. The huge problem I see in many states is that there is no policing up of corporations other than the AG and they don't do much at all.
DeleteLaxative?
DeleteThat's a shitty way to put it.
It seems to fit, though.
DeleteJust a reminder, in case the TX complaint gets to the point of deposition and discovery for the plaintiff. It wouldn't be the first time BGW, a non party, was asked to answer questions regarding her husband's claims and affairs. If BGW wants to stay out of the fray, maybe she should consider removing her name from any business related to Bill. This is from the verified complaint Windsor v Hatten filed 5/20/11.
ReplyDelete51. Prior to being diagnosed, BGW developed a severe case of anxiety. She has been seeing a psychiatrist, Dr. Brian Teliho, and he has begun medication. BGW has trouble tolerating medication, so she is very slowly having the dosage increased. Thus far, the medication has not had any meaningful impact on the anxiety. She has trouble sleeping, shakes much of the time, cries a lot, and is in a state of panic. Her irrational fear is that Judge Duffey will put her in jail. She has done nothing to be put in jail, but that is her fear. She also fears that someone will kill her because of Windsor’s efforts to expose judicial corruption.
52. BGW is physically and mentally incapable of handling matters relating to the Bogus Action...
81. On October 6, 2010, BGW was served with a subpoena by MOTM and Steamboat to produce documents on October 18, 2010. (Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of the subpoena.)
82. Windsor filed a Notice of Request for Specific Approval to file Motion for Stay on October 12, 2010. (Exhibit 1 Doc.92.) (A true and correct copy of the cover letter is Exhibit 10.)
85. BGW filed a timely Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoena on October 18, 2010. (Exhibit 1 Doc. 96.)
169. ...Judge Duffey issued an order to compel... Judge Duffey is accusing Windsor of violating court orders, committing forgery, and committing the unauthorized practice of law for the purpose of damaging Windsor and to obstruct justice. It is possible that one or more of the Defendants may be attempting to have Windsor killed to obstruct justice...
I vote for Bill goes back to spending his life chasing down judges instead of people that oppose his ideas for political reform. People posting opinions on a blog don't appear to be as large a health hazard.
DeleteBill's recap of the hearing where Thrash declared him vexatious:
Toward the end, I commented on the reported government plot to have me assassinated. I said I found it hard to believe at first, but stranger things have happened. Several judicial corruption activists have been murdered mysteriously. Then, I paused for effect, and after several seconds of dead silence, I said: "The truth of the matter is that killing me would be the smartest thing the government could do. That's the only way you will stop me. Rest assured that I will spend the rest of my life exposing all of you and bringing you to justice. I am now connected with over 10,000 people around the country, and we are organizing. We are going to return justice to our federal judicial system. We are owed fundamental rights, and we will get them back."
http://abusedswanblogger.blogspot.com/2011/07/william-m-windsor-banned-from-filing.html
Well, she may think she is a non party, and Windsor may like to pretend she has nothing to do with it, but reality is much different than the delusions he suffers from. Barbara will be named soon. He is suing for and on behalf of a company she is director of. Period.
DeleteHere's the deal, IMO: BGW was dragged into MOM II & III with subpoena and was compelled for production because Bill appealed the agreement he signed to settle MOM I. Bill says she was upset by it. He tried to stop it. When the stops didn't work, Bill sued the judges.
DeleteOn early Talkshoes, Bill makes statements on several occasions indicating BGW has absolutely no interest in his political groups or activity. I believe him. The divorce decree verbiage suggests to me that the clause might be an effort to make sure she has no claim to anticipated future profits. So, why is her name on Lawless America for anything?
As I understand it, Bill is suing 1,000+ people for a bunch of money with claims of conspiracy, defamation, business interference and the dissolution of his marriage. BGW clearly is aware of Bill's vexatious tendencies. BGW clearly is aware that her name is listed as Director of the organization that is subject to Bill's complaint, one she has no interest in. BGW should also be aware that if Bill gets this case rolling, and she is forced to participate, he is likely to try the same stops, which are likely to have same result.
This whole thing is so stupid, nobody should be dragged into it. I sure don't want anybody to be as upset by it as BGW appears to have been in 2010/11 and before. But just like in MOM, the people named in Bill's complaints are entitled to a defense. If she's forced to participate in this action, I'm not going to feel any more sorry for her than I do for any of Bill's other ex's.
Actually any company that Bill Created on his own is fifty percent hers by marriage.
DeleteAt this point her best argument is that she is exceptionally stupid (a very possible claim) and didn't know about all the things Bill was entangling her in.
DeleteI think that too, she may not realize Bill put her name on stuff. But now she definitely knows about LA. In her position, I'd make dang sure find out where else he used my name and get it off.
DeleteIs she still listed as Director of Lawless America, or are you talking about Alcatraz? Who is Bill suing? I thought he had just gone underground, and was putting his ducks in a row.
ReplyDeleteWow, you guys are harsh. Unless it's proven that Babs knowingly and willingly participated, I just don't feel a need to be angry at her. Nor do I think she should be penalized, even in ways like being dragged in the mess. Good for her for running like the wind when her hubby leapt onto the crazy train. Maybe not soon enough for some, but she did. I'm just not convinced she or Ryan were maliciously involved. Maybe they are, but I just don't see what you guys see. Babs wasn't sitting outside my house and Ryan didn't publish lies about me. I know, I know, ..... :-)
ReplyDeleteAllie Gate, Willing Participated? Is that a question your asking? Seriously? What about those buses that she helped bill get for the DC event using Reserve123? That was only 4 days before January 28th the day the corporation was created. Don't you remember? Or did you fall and hit your head?
Delete@ Allie: Nobody said anything about BGW being malicious in her involvement. Nor has anything been said reflecting anger.
DeleteI'm with Fleming - did you hit your head?
Oh yeah, and let's not forget: The statement that BGW shouldn't be dragged into this mess came from someone who did her dead level best to drag a whole bunch of people into this mess.
Delete...as I expected. SMH.
DeleteShaking your head eh? As I expected your trying to distant that fact that you know more and had much more to do with this Lawless America as #2 for sometime, yet you don't care to help anyone out. I guess when Bill is holding a lawsuit over the head of the old #2 who knows all the dirt and or has all the emails as you said you did in a rant one day last year along with knowing he has all the Social Security numbers, you might want to think about what it is that Law Enforcement might be reading if they also read his emails that pertain to you and so on. "The Soup Thickens" one might say.
DeleteReally anon, he did not ask for them. He asked his sleuths to get them using access to databases that are not open to the public. they were gained by getting them without permission. There is well documented info on this. LOL, I know you like to defend this guy, This could end up being a big ID Theft case also.
Delete@ Fleming, ya just keep adding more and more assumptions in your head. WTH is wrong with the real things that went down? Why ya gotta add into it all the time? You sound more like Windbag every day. Ya, I have over a thousand emails. Ya, some are very incriminating. Ya, the police and the courts have all of it. No, I'm not jumping on the conspiracy wagon with you guys. No, I didn't involve anyone in this mess. And no, I don't feel inclined to help folks who do nothing but mouth at me and accuse me of crap that I can prove I wasn't involved in. Besides, my personal opinion is that "some" defendants will only hurt the outcome rather than help, where having Windsor held accountable is concerned. It's like a bunch of Bill's throwing wads of ridiculousness back and forth. My opinion. So what? Everyone have a good evening. My once a day quota of theatrics if filled.
DeleteAs Always she can't handle the truth. I just don't understand why your always protecting Barbara. The company was fraudulent you know it, you wanted to have it on your own or have some part in it. It was not placed in your name, and then you have a hissy fit. That is how I see it.
DeleteBarb gets thrown in the middle because bill lists his divorce and not being able to speak to his grandkids as a reason he thinks he needs damages. If I were her, I would remind him to just go ahead and delete that little lie out of all his vexi filings since it directly involves her.
DeleteI'm still trying to figure out how Bill stalking anybody/everybody has any relevance to building a defense against Bill's claims that 3rd parties caused his domestic issues.
Delete@ GS, I can agree with that. @ Nothing, it doesn't.
DeleteYea I mean I can believe her when she says she knows nothing about it, even though its her name listed as director. It's perfectly in tune with the level of deception he does in everything. But to blame others for her divorcing him seems like a lie she would want to head off before it gets too involved
DeleteWhere is my little violin, BIll has such an emotional Distress. Pfffft. I am certain that nobody here has caused Bill any emotional Distress.
DeleteAllie said: "Maybe they are, but I just don't see what you guys see. Babs wasn't sitting outside my house and Ryan didn't publish lies about me."
DeleteAlso, if you are going to feign concern about her being dragged into a mess you started, it would be more helpful if you did not call her Babs. It shows a lack of respect. As Bill refers to her by her given name, it's a pretty safe bet that is the name she prefers to be called by.
I think Allie is missing the point about adding Barbara into the suit. It isn't about who was stalking, it is about the company he said he didn't own. If she signed the papers for the LLC, then there is no way she can play like she knew nothing about it. If she didn't sign them and Bill put her down without her knowledge, then that is something along the lines of fraud. Whatever the case, Windsor is suing for damages to his "movie" under Lawless America, he is suing for the loss of his "family" (as he has claimed in numerous other articles blaming everyone along the way for the same thing). So, lets not get all weepy about it. It is what it is, and this is all Bill's doing. He had the chance to put his big boy panties on and just ignore those who don't agree with his hidden agenda, but it didn't benefit him to do that. Being in the courts, suing everyone under the sun...that is his driving force, it's what he lives for. If it wasn't, he wouldn't have stated numerous times, that he would get all these so and so's imprisoned, impeached, disgraced, blah, blah, blah for the rest of his life.
DeleteNow, where in there is time for him to "get his country back?" yea, that isn't a top priority. He's going for the Gold, in Vexi titles.
"It is what it is, and this is all Bill's doing."
DeleteExactly. It's not about revenge or anger, it's about a logical and factual defense against complaints and claims for damages that never should have been made.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI'm obviously not a big fan of Schied and I think his relationship with Trish was like poison for her, but I would be careful in specific terminology.
Deleteok just hard to set back see nothing being done
DeleteI hear ya.....that whole ordeal left more questions than answers and sad that such a bubbly/bright woman like Trish succumbed to these SovCit vampires that sucked the life right out of her.
Deleteyes and they need to pay for this just so angry
DeleteKarma you should contact me. Like to know more about what your sitting on over there.
Delete"Susan" I presume? LMAO you are so touchy about your little Willy. Hahahahaha
DeleteYes, he has a hidden agenda that he did not disclose when he told people he was just making a movie. No where at any time did he state he wanted to charge elected officials with treason. NO WHERE. Since you are part of that crap ass theory, you don't get it, but several people he filmed bolted when they found out what his real agenda was. Now Piss off down that vexi river with Willy. And you are WRONG about who agrees with my "theory" BTW. Several courts and Judges agree with me, NOT YOU. TROLL BITCH
But in a backwards way of defending Schied....after listening to him on all his shows and whatever, he really believes the BS he is saying. And that's a stark contrast from bill who is clearly just playing games. David, no matter how insane, really believes what he is saying and his conviction is probably what drew Trish in.
DeleteDavid is very wrong on all accounts, but I really don't believe he can see it. He is a captive of his own mind.
We will know how it all works out for this group in New York soon. The National Liberty Alliance. That is the group he was talking about.
DeleteAnon 7:23.....I think Allie is missing the point about adding Barbara into the suit. It isn't about who was stalking, it is about the company he said he didn't own....
DeleteI think you are missing the point that I do not care about the company, or lack there of, who owns it or doesn't, his money or his family's interests. My concerns center simply around what Bill himself physically does to cause people harm and fear. That includes online, in court, and in person at homes. All the other crap is not my business. You can see that as 'not helping' or as 'helping Bill' all you like. I see it as 'none of my business' and 'half of it is bunk anyway'. We all have reasons to be here, with one common reason being Windsor needs to stop. Why must everyone pick apart the others reasons? I was there for part of this stuff. In the flesh. I know some of what is spoken here in comments is false. Some is true. Some I just don't know. I choose to stick with the parts I know are true. To each their own, you know? For you, it may be about a company he said he didn't own. For me, it's not about that at all. And no Fleming, this doesn't mean I must be covering illegal company involvement because I wanted in on the action, or am being blackmailed. Lololol.
Wow, are you just dense? The entire basis of the suit revolves around a company he doesn't own. It revolves around a family he said he lost due to his false allegations. The same false allegations he's been peddling for years, just changing "haters." All the other butt hurt allegations are trivial to the basis of the suit. You don't think Barbara should be included but you fail to see that Bill put her in there regardless. So, basically in your mind, Barbara's testimony is irrelevant? No one need bring up any key points about the fact that he doesn't have a stake to a claim for "loss" to a company he doesn't have any rights to? And the family's testimony as to why they bolted is also irrelevant? SMH
DeleteNo, I said none of that. I said I just don't care about it. I don't fail to see anything, I am just not interested. It's not as big a deal to me as it is to you folks. The whole lawsuit thing. As I said, to each their own.
DeleteIt would not be the first time someone tries to insulate themselves from damages by acting in the name of a shell corporation, owned by an unsuspecting family member.
DeleteNone of this is surprising. In fact, it's pretty old school. Judges see through these sorts of schemes.
The problem is you have to go through the process in order for a judge to see through it. There are a lot of people being forced through the process for absolutely no legitimate reason.
DeleteI had no idea there was a perception of "one common reason" to be here. As for the folks that are only here to stop Windsor - how is that working out?
I'm only here because Marty molested my camel...
DeleteNothing, let me be more clear. I believe that in general, most of the folks who comment here, want Bill to stop harassing people. We all have different ideas, notions, reasons, but most here want him to stop. Is that not a fair statement?
DeleteAnd that camel thing... ^^^
DeleteYa, and the camel thing. That was horrifying.
DeleteYou know since you know that Windsor formed his corporation in his wife's name while you were the supposed #2 person organizing bus transportation and being on a top 10 list. Why not make an affidavit about it? Why not let the truth be known about what you know about the corporation that is asking for over 16 million dollars.
DeleteUmmm, not sure about the camel thing. It appeared to me the camel had the upper hand. Or at least the better position.
DeleteI'm only here because Joey Dauben posted slanted and twisted stories about 2 people close to me. The rest has just evolved over time as a form of entertainment.
Like with Joey, we can expose what Bill is doing and discuss it, but Bill is going to stop himself eventually. Just like Joey did. And as you pointed that out several posts ago, Bill will keep going. Until he just isn't going any more. Nobody can do anything to stop Bill. From this view, any attempt to "stop" Bill just makes him more determined to hunt people down just to harass them.
And you are perfectly aware of why I take exception to your statement. The people feeding Bill info are clearly NOT trying stop Bill. They are using Bill's vexi nature to satisfy their own need to hurt people they just don't like. It is harassment of others by proxy.
"Ummm, not sure about the camel thing. It appeared to me the camel had the upper hand. Or at least the better position."
DeleteMy camel was legally a minor.
OK, you win with that one.
DeleteHow's the bus money savings account coming along?
Sean D. FlemingMarch 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM
DeleteYou know since you know that Windsor formed his corporation in his wife's name while you were the supposed #2 person organizing bus transportation and being on a top 10 list. Why not make an affidavit about it? Why not let the truth be known about what you know about the corporation that is asking for over 16 million dollars.....I don't even know what you're talking about. I know you guys assume his wife owns the thing, because her name is on some thing you found as administrator. The buses? In DC there was one shuttle and I'm not the one who finalized that, I believe Babs was. Or at least an email in Babs name. The number 2 thing was a facebook prop, I was his biggest volunteer and one day he up and facebook announced I was vice president. Lol, there wasn't really anything to be vice president OF, unless you count a facebook group and an organization that didn't exist. Top 10 list, ya, you lost me. No idea. As for affidavits, I do what my council advises me to do. There is no need for any affidavits at this time, and when you find out what I "know" you are going to be sorely disappointed apparently. Let's just for fun, imagine that I do know a lot about his corporation or lack thereof. Let's pretend I did make bus arrangements in DC. Now what? I mean, I guess it's illegal to schedule transportation these days? Is it also illegal to know about corporations or know someone who owns one? IDK, I suppose if you believe I had knowledge of some illegally formed corporation and I was involved in it, then ya, you'd believe my affidavit would be relevant.
nothingbettertodotodayMarch 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM
The people feeding Bill info are clearly NOT trying stop Bill. They are using Bill's vexi nature to satisfy their own need to hurt people they just don't like. It is harassment of others by proxy......omg, I agree with something Nothing said. <>> I do agree with that. Shame you think it's me, you are very wrong, but I agree with what you just said there.
So Allie after the email you received as being one of the trusted ten people he thought he could trust going to asking about what to do to incorporate as a 501c3 and saying that he could not have it in his name. Do you find it any surprise that the corporation is in his wife's name or do you think that is some made up piece of paper I manufactured? I would figure that you knew the company is not in his name since he told you in an email and then you offered to put in your name as the email states. The point here is that you could be defending yourself in along with helping others by making it a fact that you are witness to him forming a company that he put in someone else's name so that he did not have maid of the mist coming after him.
DeleteWhat about those social security numbers he has? Are they secure or did someone steal them from his hard drive? You know that he has an obligation that if he took social security numbers from people up front as clients and that information was breached he owes them some notification as a business owner.
Oh, the ten trusted people was who he sent the database to, and instructions to carry on should anything happen to him. I think that's what you're talking about with the ten people. I was one of them. Yes.
DeleteThe only ones he asked what to do about LA and making it some sort of entity, were Dottie and I. Course, he uses blind copy a lot, but I think it was just the two of us. Sean, I'm not saying you manufactured any paper. What I'm saying is, I don't know if LA is a legal entity or not, I don't know if Babs owns it, and I don't care. Who is saying that I won't answer the question truthfully in court, about witnessing him contemplating forming a corporation in someone else's name to avoid MoM? I didn't witness him actually doing it, but I did witness him contemplating it and any other ideas to get the LA name protected. So what? Do I agree with it? No. Do I feel the need to write affidavits about it against my council's advice? No. Do I think that email puts me in an illegal situation? No. Did I witness him illegally doing it? No. Did he go on to do it later? I don't know. And I don't much care, other than I view it as wrong if he did. Especially if he used his astranged wife's name without her consent. The fact is, though, I don't really know for sure. And neither do you.
The social security numbers thing has been stretched way out of proportion. Way back when, I was referring to a copy of a database I saw that was different than the other copies. It had peoples info on it, just like the others. It had additional info boxes, like ss numbers, home phones, recent involvement in other movements, and colors standing for different things. Are they secure? I have no idea. Did someone steal his drive? I highly doubt it, lol.
Just counter claim Bill, subpoena me, and ask me these questions on the stand. It's really not such a huge ass deal as it's portrayed here most of the time.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI agree, she will never be required to participate.
DeleteYep,we'll probably know how it all works out for NLA next week. Letter number 6 was sent out. On 3/24 a common law (aka citizens) grand jury will file a warrant with the sheriff. They expect 5 people to be removed from office immediately, arrested and tried. If the sheriff doesn't do as commanded, he will be guilty of several crimes, including treason.
ReplyDeleteAnd they seem to be serious about it:
"Please read the attached papers that We the People will be filing Monday, March 24, 2014 which will certainly draw the line in the sand, declaring war against tyranny, may God have mercy upon our souls."
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Letter%20to%20Sheriff%20w-Quo%20Warranto.pdf
It also says it's a declaration of war
ReplyDeleteleft you face book message
DeleteSlowly. Trying to get Flo to kick in a few bucks, now that Marty has found another stooge.
ReplyDeleteRe: NBTDT @ 3:30 ^^^
DeleteLOL. Flo might be a slow go too. I heard she's helping her nephew or something.
DeleteIn the past Bill has used other last names for Barbara in his business dealings. going back decades.....
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you have against tuna fish?
DeleteLMAO. I think the operative word is "bad".
DeleteI want to hear more about how it went "bad" after he refused to finance the RV.
So everyone can visit the newest site about me. I know I am famous. A famous person who reads comments on newspaper and tv comment sections, Facebook news and elsewhere and because of this I am a cyberterrorist. LOL.
ReplyDeleteDeanna Kloostra makes this website. says she is not a conspiracy theorist but then goes on to say that I am... "Sean is working for Deanna Kloostra's former spouse. He is being paid to make up lies and to try and discredit Deanna and her reputation. Sean is also in a law suit for harassing other people."
I am LMAO right now. I want to know how a commenting person has become cyberstalker.
I have to say This is not the first time someone has called out her conspiracy claims.
Here is the website http://flamingsean.blogspot.com/
DeleteHeh. You are a wanna be investigative blogger? That's like calling someone a wanna be pedestrian.
DeleteActually Ginger no I just like talking about news. I am not investigating nothing. I just like to comment on things I read or hear about. I have no time to investigate. My brother said I am more like a news commentator. News commentators are people who just give comment to a news story. Interesting enough, news happens and then they comment. Verse a reporter breaking news which is not me at all.
DeleteI have just read the funniest post... "I need an affidavit from someone who has read Joeyisalittlekid.BlogSpot.com. Is there someone out there who has read all the defamation who would be willing to sign a simple affidavit that says you have done so?
ReplyDeleteIf so, please don't post -- email me at nobodies@att.net."
-Bill Windsor
Maybe we could get all the people who have lawlessAmerica.com and have them sign an affidaivit saying that they also believe that there is political group of people who want to have grand Juries there. What would an affidaivit do? Confirm what I just said here? I am laughing because Bills revolutionary Party Movement has fizzled and the plan to bring politicians and others to trial for treason has been foiled.
PS Bill that little globe on your post means public.
DeleteWhat does "Public" mean?
If you're comfortable making something you share open to anyone, choose Public from the audience selector before you post.
https://www.facebook.com/help/www/203805466323736
Something that is Public can be seen by people who are not your friends, people off of Facebook, and people who view content through different media (new and old alike) such as print, broadcast (television, etc.) and other sites on the Internet. When you comment on other people’s Public posts, your comment is Public as well.
All in the name of Taking our Country Back...
DeleteToo funny:
DeleteJasmine Guidance I wish I could help but i didnt even know it existed until all of this started. What a mess!
1 hr · Like
Sharon Stephens I tried to log on to your site on FB and it told me "Dangerous site" and we will need to reject your request??? I haven't read the "Joeys Bog" but I can if you need someone to sign an affidavit.
So how did Sharon go there if there is no direct link from the post to the site here? I have never encountered that message from facebook before. Interesting another person who has no clue.
DeleteWhat? Marty's affidavit about MVZ wasn't good enough?
DeleteI guess Balloon Betty and MaryD's affidavits are worthless as well. LMAO. I guess it would look pretty bad to use those since they aren't truthful in the least bit, and MaryD's HIPAA violations were created by herself making her video and Bill posting in publically.
Delete"Your honor, here is an affidavit by a proven serial liar in Detroit, attesting to the validity of my claim that MVZ is Ginger Snap..."
DeleteLOL. I was thinking that too. Fat lot of good the last affidavits did him. The ones he solicited for something else (the MO case?), he told some of the lemmings don't worry about getting them notarized. For all the good they've done him, why doesn't he just write it himself?
DeleteOh, wait - maybe he is going to write the affidavit. He just needs someone to SIGN it.
He does write some of the affidavits himself. Ask Brenda about the one he wanted her to sign. It was incredibly dumbfounding that he expected her to sign something like that. I believe her answer was something to the effect of go f*** yourself or it's duck season or something. Then of course, we remember the mass email that went out everywhere, complete with a sample affidavit for complete strangers to sign and return. And the Mary affidavit that coincidentally sounded a lot like Windsors verbiage not Mary's. He definitely has a different view of how court works than most people do. Hell, just walk up to folks on the street and say, excuse me, I know I've never met you, but.....do I look honest to you? I'm a grandfather, Yunno. Here, would you mind signing this sworn affidavit that I am saving your country and I'm a good guy? I will put you in my blockbuster movie as a contributer if you do. It's these little nuggets that I can't help but to laugh at the lengths the poor schmuck goes to, in his years long temper tantrum.
DeleteOh, and I had the pleasure of reading the affidavits than came pouring into the Missouri court from his facebook followers. Let me tell ya, that was a hoot. The judge nor the clerk read any of them and it was ruled they didn't count. But still, they were entered, so I got to read them. Wow, they were interesting. From "I'm no help here but I like your facebook page", all the way to "I personally witnessed Allie breaking the law", from people who'd never net either one of us. Craziness in a box. A big ole box of affidavits.
Delete*met
DeleteQuotes from the Windsor Zone...
DeleteMs. Stevens...DON'T GET ON THAT SHIP...IT'S A COOKBOOK!
It appears to me that Bill has questioned yet another follower if they they are a joey. He is given the link again to the NLA who tomorrow will be giving the sheriff arrest warrants to carry out to arrest the judges. I am sure we might see news at noon or 5pm on Fox news about arrests maybe or will they be faxing it in? Will Bill join them also?
DeleteCan't be too careful of those damn Joeys...
DeleteLololol.^^^
DeleteYup.
DeleteWe're nationwide~
℗ ♛
ZZ Top has competition. http://youtu.be/PLQnRFKHZR8
DeleteReading the attack of the lemmings on Windsor's FB page is quite the insight of the group as a whole. Windsor has set up an entire world of anger and hate. They are all overly suspicious of each other, attack at random, other lemmings who start to have an epiphany that some things just don't add up.
ReplyDeleteNumerous people have tried to get Windsor back on track. However, as with the entire history of Windsor, (and I believe "Susan" would agree, you can't tell Windsor what to do) He does whatever he wants regardless of the consequences. He has people believing that this "movie" is going to be the saving grace to all their problems. He has made them believe that the "haters" don't want the movie to be made, because we somehow "fear" what it will do. That is the farthest thing from the truth ever told by Windsor. I believe it has been a common opinion here, that he didn't plan on finishing the movie. That the appearance of making a movie was to draw in more followers for his "Revolutionary Party." We laugh and joke about how many excuses he actually comes up with to get out of making it. Poor health, broken or stolen equipment, and "haters" seems to be the standard excuse. But, in actuality, it's always excuses.
Niki Hannevig has tried numerous times (unsuccessfully) to get Windsor to refocus. She knows he is obsessing over the wrong things. She knows what is really going on but she hasn't quite "gone there" with him. I doubt she will since she and Davie are so close and all, and they know how babyish Windsor is. But the underlying theme over there, is that Windsor has made a mountain out of a mole hill. Just like everything he does. It will undoubtedly be another failure in the Windsor hall of shame, but I think he knows that, and is banking on it. It is his easy way out of the mess he created, so he can blame others once again for his own failures.