So what is more insane than suing the prison you currently reside in? Well, it turns out Bill answered that for us.......suing the State that wants him for felony violations and recommitting the infraction that got him part of that charge in the first place. Turns out, even jail can't curtail Bill's vexatious and felonious activities with help from his accomplices on the outside. Monday, Bill gave berth to lawsuit #90610 in the 40th District Court with three different defendants, and in all three he is asking for a declaratory judgement: Sean Boushie, State of Montana, and Ellis County. We had already seen in his prison scribble that he was requesting a new suit for declaratory judgement against the jail....basically he wanted the judge to make those meanie guards give him back his computer because he is special and the rules never apply to him. Instead, he wants to go out legal guns a blazing by adding Sean and Montana to his insane action. Is this his way of saying I don't want to play court in Montana, lets play it down here in Texas instead?
Meanwhile, back at the institution, otherwise called his facebook page....one of his accomplices is inflaming the lemmings and driving up the comments as it seems Bill's PR campaign is back in full swing. While most of the remaining followers continue to give their daily prayers to their messiah Windsor, several others seem to be starting a letter writing campaign to elected officials to ask for inmate 14-1898's release. How long until they decide to convene a citizen grand jury to release Bill? Nicki, consistent with her sovereign citizen following, is suggesting that they use NLA (new lawless america) to come help. The person who is updating everything on Bill's page mentioned that if bill is held for 90 days he will be released. Is this his plan? Or is there a coup going on and a new leader of the mindless is coming to power? And with all that going on, we still have the hearing on the 8th coming up where Bill must hear just how much he owes Sean Fleming, from the Sean Fleming Show, in his anti-slapp judgement.
All I can say is I dare anyone to script something like this.
Nope, no one could script this.
ReplyDeleteI have to think somewhere in Windsor's head, he is trying to figure a way to profit off this. I still think he was puffing up all the defamation claims and "cyberstalking" and "crimes" to help promote his "Revolutionary Party."
His little "movie" idea didn't get as many followers as he thought, and when he claimed "the constitution was void" he got way more attention. He also got more attention when he said President Obama put a hit out on him. I really believe (and he's even written it) that drama sells so the more outrageous he can get, it will get the attention he was searching for the entire time.
He is living in a movie set, and he is the star of the show. You can't go against the star, they always have to "win" in the end. But, there are tons of twists and turns, drama, action--this is Windsor's world, this is his game (as Snooze keeps saying) so in order to shut the production down, someone needs to yell cut, and fire his ass! This aint no movie, and Windsor definitely aint no star. (all clearly my opinions of course)
Whoever is updating his facebook is also admitting Bill is guilty of violating the restraining order. God love those helpful lemmings.
DeleteBut they are claiming the reason he violated it, was sending the court documents, which isn't the reason. Well, at least not why he was arrested. Those charges may end up being put on top of the current charges, but they were not on the warrant.
DeleteIt's that kind of misinformation they keep pushing that is keeping the "conspiracy" theories alive and well. It's a lie, and it's wrong and they better edit and take that off.
New Observer here .. but just watching the exchange between Dippy Debbie & Sharon is hilarious. Now, that dismal doofus Debbie is posting "Not Bill" is a HACK ....2FUNNY !!!
DeleteLMAO yep, that is hilarious. You see, anyone that doesn't agree with the crazy things they post, automatically your a "hack." While I do think "Not Bill" created the frenzy by not being all that clear to begin with, and actually raising more questions for them...it's just how it works in the Land of the Lost Lemmings.
DeleteI wonder why Wilbur hasn't updated them yet. He was going to call the Montana Court and get to the bottom of this!! Maybe he heard some things that don't comport to those comments being flung around over there, even by "not Bill."
DeleteSusan should be here soon to call all of you liars. You didn't post proof that Bill's charges do not stem from him serving Boushie with legal documents. Until she sees proof, everyone on this blog is a liar!
DeleteI thought about posting it but, it's much more fun watching them spin and attack each other.
DeleteAs someone pointed out when we got into this discussion last week, it is substantially correct that the violation involves contacting Boushie about the law suit.
DeleteYou can revive your semantics argument again RC but I'll pass on it this time, lol.
No semantics Susan, only you play those games. The Montana charges have absolutely nothing to do with Bill contacting Sean in any way. Your statement is flat out incorrect and once again, you have nothing to verify what you claim. I'm not asking you to post anything to back your statement up because we both know you have nothing and are just guessing. You are starting to look more like a mindless lemming each day. Thanks for playing though. LMAO, SMH
DeleteI find the other source more credible than you RC.
DeleteHow unfortunate for you. You've gone from having no info to getting incorrect info. Personally, I'd rather be in the dark than making comments based on bad info. Was your trusted source able to show you the arrest affidavit. I'll go ahead and answer for you. NO! If they had, then you'd know the truth.
DeleteI'm starting to feel a little sorry for you Susan, so I'll give you this hint.
Deletehttp://tinypic.com/r/11ttp9k/8
I find the other source more credible than you RC.
DeleteBy "finding" the other source more credible, she means she assumed
it because she has NO evidence to adduce her conclusion other than a ghost telling her it is so.
I figure the other source is her own imagination. Susan is famous for pulling facts out of her ass and presenting them as valid truths.
Delete@NotBill is not helping Bill!
ReplyDeleteEven the dimmer bulbs are beginning to see light!
This is seriously THE best entertainment in years!
Somehow, I doubt this was what Bill had in mind when he instructed @NotBill to keep posts in the #newsfeed!
The screenshots of DebbieDumbshit huffing off? Hilarious! MaryD is getting pissy, too! Nar a mention of a tick in hours!
Omggggggggh!
Holy Vexi Shit!
Delete@NotBill has them spinning!
It's a long time until Monday! Nikki just needs to swoop in with another #NLA shameless plug & the majority of the #LLL are going off the grid with #TabOpen #DebbieDumbShit (How to Completely Disappear tab)
That boomeranging dang karma! Really walloping his ass while he's incarcerated!
Making more popcorn, you're so right anon@8:30 this is the best entertainment I've seen in months. Poor "Not Bill" is def not helping, plus Jen is getting snarky with her/him ...Ditzy Deb bailed out after claiming "Not Bill" is a Hack & the battle brewing between Roby & Sharon is comical !!!!!!!! Bahahaha
DeleteLA Facebook page is best comedy I've read in ages. While Sharon and Roby discuss how Windsor can serve process on Boushie, @realBill has already served him by certified mail (12/1)... they don't see this?
DeleteNow they are so far down this "how to serve" rabbit hole, they've completely forgotten none of that is relevant to Windsor's order.
DeleteWhat's going to happen when they all find out Windsor lied to them about the order? And violating it? There wouldn't be a "conspiracy" argument--just a Windsor lied realization.
HAHAHAHAH OMG!! How did Bill know there was an order against him??? Holy crap!! They really weren't paying attention. He only tried to appeal it to every court in MT and was repeatedly denied.
DeleteThese rocks never read anything, research anything and that is their biggest problem. We all read all the court documents. Perhaps instead of going off of Windsor's lies, they should have been following along in the court cases, with actual court documents! Their "upon information and belief" is going over as well as Windsor's. FAIL!!
The title picture above, and the "@NotBill" is enough to spit your drink out at alone! The reading over at LA? Omg! No words!
ReplyDelete~Allie Gate
Oh my...it's almost painful watching Roby scramble.
ReplyDeleteNo Roby--there was no litigation going on at the time the protection order was issued, so no, the protection order was not retaliation to keep Windsor from being able to serve. He was stalking. Period. The stalking trip Windsor did, to earn the protection order was in August. Windsor tried to appeal several times and lost. You might say that it was Windsor who tried to retaliate against Boushie, by then suing him in TX, which was filed in December of last year--well after knowing the MT courts weren't buying his Billshit, and he had a protection order against him.
Windsor didn't serve the TX complaint to Boushie properly, which prompted a sanction request against Windsor. Windsor repeatedly lied to the Judge in TX, about serving Boushie properly. It's on record now, the lies--which actually might be used against him in the felony case in MT.
Awwww.....Roby deleted her scrambling. Wonder if she went back and saw how silly her questions really were, and how Sharon did answer her, and she just wasn't "getting it."
Delete"Not Bill" sure didn't help much there with her "insider" information. Almost like she plays Bill games to confuse and add to the spinning.
@10:22: You've got it backwards, as usual. Roby was asking a good question and Sharon did not answer it.
DeleteUh, no you're suffering from some kind of blind thing. Roby asked if he served Boushie correctly, and Sharon said he did not. She was correct.
DeleteThat's a pretty funny statement when you consider the person making it still has no clue what the PO violation was.
DeletePathetic that a 64 year old woman (Snooze) has nothing better to do then troll this blog.
Delete#HilarityHangover
ReplyDeleteThank you @NotBill! I was anticipating Monday rather mundanely. Now? Bwahahahaha!
#LifeIsSoGood
#Laughing
What Bill supporters should do now is a letter writing blitz to Ellis County Sheriff Johnny Brown, outlining the treatment by his jailers, any abuse he's suffered, and his unjust incarceration. Insinuating multiple lawsuits will be directed at individuals in the Sheriffs Dept. would help as well. That's what I'd do....
ReplyDeleteNow that he's suing states and counties, how does that tie in with the Judge Thrash ruling? Contempt?
ReplyDeleteGood question. What about the vexi title from MT? Does anyone know if there were any other specific provisions limiting his suing capabilities, or did they just say that he is vexatious?
DeleteI could be mistaken, but I was under the impression that Judge Carroll had ruled that Thrash's order has no effect in Texas state courts, or at least in Carroll's own Texas state court. (Unless I've totally missed it, there's no indication that any federal judge has signed off on Windsor filing any lawsuits in Texas—quite the opposite, in fact.)
DeleteWhichever local judge presides over the new Texas lawsuit Windsor has filed against Ellis County, the State of Montana (heh!), and Sean the Vexi-Slayer could follow Carroll's lead—or not. Hard to tell.
(And, re Sean: Given where Windsor is now sitting and why he's sitting there, it's pretty ballsy to file yet another lawsuit against Mr. Boushie, isn't it? Ballsy, I guess, or else utterly self-destructive? How many felony charges would Windsor like to face?)
November 14, 2013:
Delete"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that William M. Windsor, and any parties
acting in concert with him or at his behest, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from filing any complaint or initiating any proceedings, Including any new lawsuit or administrative proceedings, in any Montana State Court or agency in the State of Montana without first obtaining 'eave of a District Court Judge in the district in which the new complaint or proceeding is to be filed. In seeking such leave, William M. Windsor must present any such court with a copy of this Order. If the lawsuit or administrative proceeding names judges
or court employees, the William M. Windsor must also tender a $50,000 cash bond or a $50,000 corporate surety bond sufficient to satisfy an award of sanctions since such actions are presumably frivolous. Failure to obey this Order, including by attempting to avoid or circumvent the intent of this Order,will be grounds for sanctions including contempt."
(Page 10)
http://tinyurl.com/pvmgxfp
Suing Boushie from Texas instead of Montana certainly appears to be avoiding and circumventing the order and intent of the order, and that may be two violations - one for the lawsuit and another for serving him by mail on 12/1. Live vexi, live dangerously?
Suing Boushie from Texas instead of Montana certainly appears to be avoiding and circumventing the order and intent of the order, and that may be two violations[.]
DeleteMeh. The Order clearly says that Windsor can't initiate proceedings in Montana. Initiating one in Texas against a guy in Montana certainly doesn't violate the Order.
Now, serving Boushie with process as a possible PO violation—that's different, and far more plausible.
After reading all the MT orders, I'd try this out of state filing as circumventing (as a violation) - definitely!
DeleteThe saying is "go big or go home". The problem is when Bill throws out his huge net on lawsuits, and names all these defendants, to a simple person, such as myself, are this vast number of people in the wrong, or is it just him?
ReplyDeleteSince he's in jail, writing these motions on napkins or whatever, well........
He's THE only one right, ever, except for his mouf piece, Susan/Sharon.
DeleteIt's literally Windsor vs THE entire Internet, world, Shitfire, THE UNIVERSE!
And don't giggle about any of his absurdities either or that'll cause another Avalanche of butthurt filings ;)
windsorinjail@yahoo.com Kinda has a permanent sound to it, huh?
Together, they certainly nailed me and Sluggo being one and the same...
DeleteOf course! There is no possible way that the 2 of you are really 2! You must be only 1, with multiple sign-in monikers!
Delete*eyeroll*
Duh, we are all that Mike guy anyway. There are all those #tells. I dunno why we even bother.
℗ ♛ ❥
I'll second that.
Delete~Sluggo/Spamanon
Meet Kimberly Spence--the woman explaining about laws and court procedures. (And still focusing on the non issue of arrest warrant due to "service.") SMH ROCKS!!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.georgia-mugshot-gallery.com/Counties/Fulton-County/Kimberly-Spence.15030697.html
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&ved=0CDwQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.whatsbest4spencer.com%2Fuploads%2FJudge_John_Goger_6-17-13_Order_on_Arrest_and_Attorney_Willis_7-10-13_Motion_to_Address_Child_Support_Arrearage.pdf&ei=gcuAVK3hHIivogTeh4KoAQ&usg=AFQjCNGfuK8n6GZVHsDHcjnMqdiqA5UpeQ
LOL!!! She couldn't understand one paper and had to question other judges--which she was told specifically not to do? Ending up with contempt? And SHE'S telling the lemmings what to do to get Windsor released? hahahahahahah!!
Delete"3 | Windsor was barred from posting the petitioners name online."
ReplyDeleteThe rest of that stuff seems enforceable. This one does not. Kind of surprised they included it. What say our resident Lawyers?
I believe anything that placed the Petitioner at risk, due to Windsor's actions, either in person or on line-- are enforceable.
DeleteSorry; I don't know enough about the substantive law (not least because it's Montana law) governing orders of protection to provide knowledgeable comment.
DeleteI asked the question, Snooze, and I accept Attorney's answer as factual. Especially since MT was just adding that to the list. Doesn't mean they won't drop that part once prosecution begins. States can and do practice legal maneuvering. They're lawyers. It's what they do. Probably unethical for them *not* to do it in the interest of their client (in this instance, the State of Montana).
DeleteBullshit. Neither of us have other things to do or we wouldn't be awake at this hour.
DeleteAnd on top of that, you won't walk away from anyone who pays the least bit of attention to you. Pretty sad.
Delete12:24: Whoever you are, don't talk about this anymore.
DeleteWow! Snoozan wants to argue prior restraint on the one hand but restrain your right to free speech on the other. WHAT A HONKIN' HYPOCRITE!
She told you not to talk anymore? Dying laughing.
DeleteSince hearing of her previous vocation all I envision is Susan on her stripper pole spinning like a loon begging an empty room for a nickel. Anything she has to say since then is down right hilarious. Bottom feeder low lifes love their Willy's in more way than one.
Oh, we're not supposed to talk about this? ok!!
DeleteWell then, let's read.
"Violation of an Order of Protection is a crime. You should call local law enforcement immediately. The abuser may be arrested. You should also keep a written diary of all the times the abuser violates the Order of Protection. It could help law enforcement and the prosecutor file criminal charges against the abuser. Only the respondent (or abuser) under an Order of Protection may be cited for a violation; the petitioner (you) who filed for the order may not be cited. A violation of any terms of an Order of Protection is punishable under MCA 45-5-626. If the respondent (abuser) violates an Order of Protection, he or she may also be charged with other crimes such as trespassing (MCA 45-6-203) and stalking (MCA 45-5-220)."
https://dojmt.gov/victims/orders-of-protection/
" 45-5-220. Stalking -- exemption -- penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of stalking if the person purposely or knowingly causes another person substantial emotional distress or reasonable apprehension of bodily injury or death by repeatedly:
(a) following the stalked person; or
(b) harassing, threatening, or intimidating the stalked person, in person or by mail, electronic communication, as defined in 45-8-213, or any other action, device, or method.
(2) This section does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity.
(3) For the first offense, a person convicted of stalking shall be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 1 year or fined an amount not to exceed $1,000, or both. For a second or subsequent offense or for a first offense against a victim who was under the protection of a restraining order directed at the offender, the offender shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 5 years or fined an amount not to exceed $10,000, or both. A person convicted of stalking may be sentenced to pay all medical, counseling, and other costs incurred by or on behalf of the victim as a result of the offense.
(4) Upon presentation of credible evidence of violation of this section, an order may be granted, as set forth in Title 40, chapter 15, restraining a person from engaging in the activity described in subsection (1).
(5) For the purpose of determining the number of convictions under this section, "conviction" means:
(a) a conviction, as defined in 45-2-101, in this state;
(b) a conviction for a violation of a statute similar to this section in another state; or
(c) a forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure the defendant's appearance in court in this state or another state for a violation of a statute similar to this section, which forfeiture has not been vacated.
(6) Attempts by the accused person to contact or follow the stalked person after the accused person has been given actual notice that the stalked person does not want to be contacted or followed constitutes prima facie evidence that the accused person purposely or knowingly followed, harassed, threatened, or intimidated the stalked person."
http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/45/5/45-5-220.htm
Plenty of other fun links there as well...
Montana Code - Section 45-8-212: Criminal defamation - See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/mtcode/45/8/2/45-8-212#sthash.k7g3UB1c.dpuf
Delete"1) Defamatory matter is anything that exposes a person or a group, class, or association to hatred, contempt, ridicule, degradation, or disgrace in society or injury to the person's or its business or occupation.(2) Whoever, with knowledge of its defamatory character, orally, in writing, or by any other means, including by electronic communication, as defined in 45-8-213, communicates any defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed commits the offense of criminal defamation and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 6 months in the county jail or a fine of not more than $500, or both.(3) Violation of subsection (2) is justified if:(a) the defamatory matter is true;(b) the communication is absolutely privileged;(c) the communication consists of fair comment made in good faith with respect to persons participating in matters of public concern;(d) the communication consists of a fair and true report or a fair summary of any judicial, legislative, or other public or official proceedings; or(e) the communication is between persons each having an interest or duty with respect to the subject matter of the communication and is made with the purpose to further the interest or duty.(4) A person may not be convicted on the basis of an oral communication of defamatory matter except upon the testimony of at least two other persons that they heard and understood the oral statement as defamatory or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere."
45-8-213. Privacy in communications. (1) Except as provided in 69-6-104, a person commits the offense of violating privacy in communications if the person knowingly or purposely:
Delete(a) with the purpose to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy, or offend, communicates with a person by electronic communication and uses obscene, lewd, or profane language, suggests a lewd or lascivious act, or threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to the person or property of the person. The use of obscene, lewd, or profane language or the making of a threat or lewd or lascivious suggestions is prima facie evidence of an intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy, or offend.
(b) uses an electronic communication to attempt to extort money or any other thing of value from a person or to disturb by repeated communications the peace, quiet, or right of privacy of a person at the place where the communications are received;
http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/45/8/45-8-213.htm
Snoozan claims the order forbidding Windsor to write about Boushie is illegal because it's prior restraint. That's true, although I haven't researched the law (like Snooze, I'm not a lawyer), my hunch is this: the order concerns an active case, so it's essentially a gag order, which is lawful.
DeleteShe is looking to hard for something to dismiss Windsor's illegal actions. (I say illegal because the court agreed his actions were illegal and worthy of a protection order) I believe the court made the order for a very specific reason and the beginning of "Criminal defamation" might hold true. Windsor posted things that were not proven--as if they were fact. Windsor's online campaign to defame the Plaintiff and his "business" was clear. Look at all the hatred now inflicted upon Plaintiff by the Lemmings due to what Windsor posted alone. It was a gag order to keep the Plaintiff from further harm, and he violated it--several times. IMO
DeleteNovember 2013 Decision - this is part of an order of protection, not another case. All these cases are final. Look them up. Windsor appealed them until he was declared vexi and told to stop suing Boushie (in Montana) and to not circumvent that order (like, don't use another state to sue).
Deletehttp://tinyurl.com/pvmgxfp
Perfect!! Thank you for putting that link up.
Delete[img]https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRzXEf3--QRcpdEky8kXtcUXLm5nXKtiUOHwRjif1in5NK8mOY-xA[/img]
DeleteNote to readers: FYI, several posts by Snoozan, AKA Sharon V., have been deleted by Admin.
Right Ninja; the court outlines why it gave Boushie and his wife the order of protection and supported it quite soundly. Snoozan is now saying the order is not lawful? Pfft. I don't see the domain name as being released per court order... (violation).
DeleteThe order went further with the above (stop suing, and don't circumvent this order...) so I foresee a lot more PPO violations. Live vexi, live in jail ...and that is Windsor's choice. The lemmings need to realize " jail" is Windsor's choice & he saw that one coming.
Serving Boushie by certified mail was a dumb, dumb move, one that says, 'just put me on the extradition bus to Montana." Jolly way to spend Christmas. (sending the rest by email)
Delete[img]http://piggington.com/files/images/Troll%20Alert%20-%20No%20BS_0.jpg[/img]
Admin,
DeleteThank you for your diligence in keeping this blog troll free. You may want to delete any troll alerts which have been acted on (such as the one above...may prevent confusion by readers).
THANKS!
[img]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR0e9DYGtK8[/img]
ReplyDeleteWarning: May cause serious gobsmacking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR0e9DYGtK8
ReplyDeletePuke worthy.
DeleteThe #USFlag displayed in such a manner is utterly disgusting to me.
Wasted bandwidth.
What's the deal with Billy's beard? Did he grow his stub out or shave it all off as an anti-lice measure? Curious minds...
DeleteHe looked fine at last hearing. Healthier than he's appeared in the past year.
DeleteHis beard could use a trim & should he stay in the ESCO jail facility much longer? He'll get it trimmed. Off.
@NotBill just re-affirms what I've suspicioned for some time, now. He has #hiredhelp, no one would wade through the absurd, sovereign stupity among the #LawlessLeaderlessLosers for free, except Windsor.
#MondayMondayMondayMondayMondayMonday
Monday—
DeleteAre we expecting the amount of Anti-SLAPP damages that Windsor owes Fleming to be set (or announced or whatever) on Monday? Or will Carroll just be taking arguments on that question? Or am I just confused about scheduling?
You are correct about the topic of that hearing, I'm not sure if they will decide the number that day or afterwards. The hearing starts at 1:30
DeleteNot Bill here - There are very strict rules about the type of mail prisoners can receive. Before sending anything to Bill, please review the rules:
ReplyDeletehttp://elliscountysheriff.com/index.phpoption=com_content&v…
You can't mail Bill any money. There is a system that allows you to deposit money on account for him. Go here: http://touchpayonline.com
His mailing address is:
William M. Windsor
Housing Unit "O"
Booking Number 4019-14
c/o Wayne McCollum Detention Center
300 S. Jackson
Waxahachie, Texas 75165
Hmm. A couple of things; first is the address "Not Bill" has been providing is incorrect but that's small stuff (the link explains the correct address);
Second, why send Bill money when Jennie can deposit Windsors own money in his inmate account; why take from the lemmings..
Awww even in jail Windsor found a way to get "donations" that are still not tax deductible for the "donor."
DeleteRidiculous that a multi millionaire (allegedly-- +black amex qualifications) is actually once again, getting destitute people to send him money. I still can't get over the poor woman who gave him her last 100.00 for DC and had to sleep at Denny's because she wanted to sacrifice to donate to him.
Billy's official logo
Delete[img]http://www.tshirtrocket.com/images/inside/evil.jpg[/img]
Bill Windsor Not Bill - Others have expressed an interest in taking some sort of action on Bill's behalf. Several individuals are working on it and we'll let you know when they know what they are doing!
ReplyDeletev- a - g - u - e
"NotBill" is a "We" (Bill uses that, we chit, too)
They don't know what they are doing?
WTF. "NotBill" is Windsor's double unless Windsor has access to a computer thru voice thru those jail phones. ... maybe.
Does the action proposed include a helicopter and a dangling rope?
ReplyDeleteLMAO!
DeleteGood luck waiting...
ReplyDelete"Bill Windsor
Not Bill - Others have expressed an interest in taking some sort of action on Bill's behalf. Several individuals are working on it and we'll let you know when they know what they are doing!
2 · More · 2 hours ago"
Oops. Someone already caught that gem...
Delete@Not Bill - Judy it's nice of you to want to do something to help but representation is not an issue. Bill is handling that aspect of the situation exactly the way he wants to handle it. (reply to Judi, who thought the jail inmate couldn't afford a attorney & the idiots should get him one )
DeleteFor once, the lemmings are smarter than their leader.
DeleteStep aside folks!! Cruz is getting serious! He's called Jerry Springer's spin off, Steve Wilkos!
Delete"Cruz Gomez-- I sent an Email to a Texas congressional representative, Joaquin Castro, informing him of Bill's situation and requesting his help. I also sent an FB message to Steve Wilkos asking him to investigate and expose Bill's story on his show- The Steve Wilkos Show."
Read the LA LA comments Windsor's FB page while listening to Benny Hill. LMAO!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK6TXMsvgQg
THAT'S PERFECT!!
DeleteThe music title is "Yakety Sax."
DeleteArtists: Boots Randolph, Chet Atkins, Floyd Cramer