Bill Windsor changed his cover photo. 6 hours ago · Edited XXXXXXXX ADMITS JOEYISALITTLEKID WEBSITE HAS WRITTEN BILL WINDSOR'S OBITUARY AND DESTROYED HIS NAME BY GOOGLE BOMBING HIM.
In this published statement on Joeyisalittlekid.BlogSpot.com, the infamous "Ginger Snap" admits that the Joeyisalittlekid website's intent was to destroy me. They published one false, defamatory statement after another in hundreds of articles so they would achieve prominence in the search engines.
This and other evidence in their own published words is fabulous proof of their motive, the animosity, and the malice of these vicious cyberstalkers.
I have determined that Ginger Snap is actually XXXXXX of Red Oak, Texas. I have given XXXXXX and his father, XXXXXxX, the opportunity to say under oath that XXXXXX is not Ginger Snap. There has been no denial.
It is sadly true that the Joeyisalittlekid gang has destroyed my name. They achieved their stated goal. Now everyone who has published on that site is a defendant in William M. Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et al. And everyone who has participated in destroying my name should now be held jointly and severally liable for what they and all the others wrote. I hope the jury in Ellis County Texas throws the book at them.
If Joeyisalittlekid continues to publish this stuff, I believe everyone on there is just as guilty as XXXXXXXXX for saying this. I have told them: CEASE AND DESIST. I have requested corrections and retractions. But they just keep it up.
Wow. Bill has sure has his panties in a wad about what Gingersnap said. And, of course anybody posting on the blog is guilty, because he wants people to quit talking about him and they just won’t stop. Bill’s post is riddled with irony. As Bill knows, readership is a major factor for driving a site up in the search engines. So, how much of the issue did he cause all by himself? He advertised the site, posted the link too many times to count and demanded his followers read the all the garbage posted on the site.
Nowhere in that comment did Gingersnap say or indicate motive, animosity, malice or effort by anyone to boost the blog to the top of search engines. Gingersnap merely stated an opinion as to how Bill’s effort to dominate the internet was not exactly what Bill had in mind when he started to manipulate search engines.
The most ironic part is Bill is falsely accusing Gingersnap of doing exactly what Bill did for anybody that sent him $15 – he attempted to destroy the names of sitting judges. And recently he’s done the same to anyone that crossed him.
What goes around, comes around. Like most emotionally stunted people, he cannot take what he dishes out.
This Talkshoe is with Crystal Cox. The entire show is about the tricks used to manipulate search engines. They talk about web sites set up in the name of their targets, to “expose” them.
Female Caller: I, I need some ah help, I need to make you a file showing that um evidence in the judge’s name so that you post that saying that you can be corrupt and it what it gets you is a promotion.
Bill Windsor: Yeah, for everybody, if you, if you haven’t sent me something to post about your judge or whoever it may be, I, I am just continuing to be amazed at how much Google loves Lawless America.com. Because we are now getting things indexed within 12 hours.
Female Caller: say that again, I didn’t understand
Kpat: Wow that is, that is the best news I have heard in a month.
Female caller: I don’t know what he said, I didn’t understand.
Bill Windsor: Well, the search engines, um - then explains how search engines work to female caller, pointing out readership is one thing that drives search engines.
@ 1:20:51 Bill Windsor: So like when Pat reported the thing about uh Judge Jerry W Baxter getting the horse’s ass of the year award it was on there within 24 hours, now I’ve got things going on there within 12 hours.
Kpat: Wow.
Bill Windsor: The point is the site is loved by Google especially, and Yahoo too but Google is even better. And so if somebody sends me something on a judge, it’s going to be up there. We did this one judge David P Darden or something just the other day and now we’re number 4 and 5 on the search results. I think, was it, Pat was it you who said…
Kpat: yeah, it was number 1 when I checked that out
Bill Windsor: Larry Hohal (sp?) said the same thing, he put it in quotes or whatever and came up number 1. So, uh, the thing is sent it to me let me get it on because then we’re going to have these guys uh, uh exposed. You look on there now, there is nothing negative about them. And as soon as I get to them, then you’ve got the negative.
And this one looks a little like a conspiracy, for which motive, animosity, and malice are clear, IMO: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-115884/TS-594562.mp3 - Start 1:38
Bill Windsor: One thing we can absolutely do is if, if enough of us would toss 15 bucks into the pot per person, we can set up a web site for each of these people and I can have them exposed within the top within the 4 or 5 search results within 24, 48 hours. So there is a donation box on, we’ve never gotten a donation but there is one on Lawless America.com. Anybody who still has some money, I know that’s (unintelligible, people laughing). If there is still anyone out there has some money, ah, go on there and donate some money. And I will take every penny that gets donated and I will start buying these people’s domain names. And ah, you know I mean if somebody could toss 150 bucks in there we could get all these guys. And then, ah, I will, I will be delighted to be the person whose name is on it. And I’ll put the little stories out there. I’ll put a little I believe or whatever in there. Ah, or in my opinion or based upon what I’ve read but the headlines will be that these people are charged with corruption. And that will stand up real big and bold so that somebody goes to look up one of these lawyers or the judge that’s being considered to be the head of the law school they’ll see these things. And then if people will just do the simple little things that I’ll put out and ask, this thing will completely flood the internet. And it, we will be the mainstream media on this issue. And so I’m, I’m prepared, I’m going to do all that regardless so if anybody has any money, ah, you can go on, it’s a PayPal thing, ah, you know do some PayPal credits or do some money and we’ll get web sites for all these people. That’s something we ought to do for sure because we can do that.
John Margetis: I want to go ahead and mention two judges so they get their due justice here also. Ah, Bob Carroll who is now the 40th District Judge, is the absolute crook that started this corrupt, fraudulent judgment against my mother and I. And the new appointed judge, he got asked to step down by the state commission on judicial conduct, then Greg Wilhelm stepped in his place. So I just want to make sure, you know, Stacy Jernigan, ah, Royal Ferguson, Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm get the exposure that they’re due.
Bill Windsor: Alright. Mary, I’m going to leave it to you, whatever you name is (laughing). Whatever your name is tonight or will be tomorrow, I would like you to be in charge of getting me the list of all the players.
Mary: I will do that. And a write up on each one.
Bill Windsor: Good. And if you would, ah
Mary: Would you like a copy of what I said today?
Bill Windsor: Go ahead.
Mary: Would you like just a copy of everything that…?
Bill Windsor: That will be fine and we’ve had a couple of other names that come up here late but ah, maybe they’re just in John’s case. But if you’ll get those to me, then I will, ah you know I’ll, I’ll probably just go on and buy these sites and charge…
George McDermott: Hey Bill?
Bill Windsor: yeah
George McDermott: I’ll , I, I, I got $45 coming to you for Jernigan, for, for ah Ferguson and for the chief judge, um that I mentioned in this letter to the 5th Circuit cause I’ve, it’s negligent standard of conduct. If she’s the chief judge and she should have taken action long before she embarrassed the entire Texas code.
Bill Windsor: yep, alright George
George McDermott: Edith Jones
Bill Windsor: Edith Jones
George McDermott: Chief Judge Edith H. Jones. And I’ll, I’ll, I’ll get you the money by tomorrow morning.
Bill Windsor: You want Jones, Ferguson and who?
George McDermott: Jones, Ferguson and um ah, the bankruptcy judge, ah, ah
John Margetis: Get Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm and I’ll, and Stacy Jernigan and I’ll, I’ll cover those.
Bill Windsor: Alright. We’ve already got Jernigan, so you get Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm?
John Margetis: Yes.
Bill Windsor: OK. Alright. Uh well everybody else, throw in 15 bucks, we got more people to get. And uh, we should do the northern district of uh Texas. Uh, you know there’s a lot, a lot of different things other than just names but the names are very powerful. But we’re going to get some web stuff that’ll uh, that’ll uh spread this out.
George McDermott: You know the thing is we are doing a public service here because, because from now on people in northern district of Texas will be able to, if they want to find out what the judge is about or the court is about they’ll be able to just pull up these names and find out hold it, I don’t want these people on my case. You know I have every right to ask for recusal because, uh they’re uh named in a criminal conspiracy.
Bill Windsor: Yeah and, and uh I think, I will take it upon myself. I will write a letter to every judge in the northern district of Texas, I’ll write a letter to every federal judge in Texas. And uh give them a summary and ask them to take action on this. Then if they don’t take action we can consider that they all are guilty of misprision of felony 18 USC 4 because uh felonies were called to their attention and they didn’t report it to law enforcement. And who knows, maybe there is one of them out there that decides, hey we need to do something about this.
That's some pretty damning evidence, which you can always find the most damning comes directly out of the mouth of bill. He was offering a defamation for a fee job. His saying the "I believe or in my opinion" was proof he knew what he was doing. Defamation by search engine
Awesome information NBTDT! Exactly Ginger re "His saying the "I believe or in my opinion" was proof he knew what he was doing"
This is a infamous Windsor saying that he uses all the time too. He even uses it in his court filings. The fact that he has sunk his own battleship, seems to be his biggest bitch. He really can't stand that people keep posting his own words to prove what he denies.
I am not out to destroy Bills Personal Life but I am against stopping his movement which includes himself from further attempts at starting citizen Grand Juries that will put people all over the country on trial for treason and then execute them as punishment for the death penalty. However that gets done will never be seen since everyone who wanted a citizen Grand Jury has flocked to the National Liberty Alliance.
I have never threatened Bill. It is up to law enforcement after my complaints and thoughts on the matter to decide if he is crossing the line by planning these atrocious acts against people. He said before that they won’t wait for peaceful elections to start criminal trials buy citizen grand juries. I guess if it ever goes to a trial it is Bills Burden to convince the Jury that what I said, which was what he said is defamation, libel, and slander. I still am curious Bill why is it your Ex-Wife Barbara is listed as the Director of Lawless America Association? I Know it is because I just haven’t seen one email confirming that you emailed 10 people you could not have the corporation in your name, I have 2 of the people you sent this to now. Hmmm. The plot thickens. Forming corpations in others names to hide money that was being donated to Lawless America Association and if Maid of the Mist knew they could get that money from you. Psst. I have emailed the unsealing of the case to Maid of the Mist attorneys. I am sure they wanted to know about the case being unsealed.
Fleming: dude, you probably should have quit at the end of the first paragraph. As much as I hate to admit Allie had a point - I think what she was saying is, there is a difference between illegal and sleazy or shady. Some times people do things that are just flat wrong, but it isn't illegal. And belly bumping will just result in more belly bumping - it just delays a resolution.
Yup. That's terrific that NBTDT was able to withstand hours of permanent ear damage to provide this verbatim ala Windsor. Thank you! It's that pesky "what goes on the internet, stays on the internet" snit, again. I have no doubts, that Windsor will spin out and spew how those hateful *Joeys* have taken his words out of context. Pfffffft!
What else is uber creepy to me? The timing of Windsor's Facebook posts. 5:00am CST? Ginger is consuming Windsor's thoughts so much during the pre-dawn hours of the morning, that it's worthy of a Facebook status update. Then an edit. Then another edit.
Windsor is slap dab eat up with the dumb ass. The obsessive, compulsive, liar, attention whore, pity party, boo hoo butthurt, stupid, dumb ass. For over a year he was giving step by step instructions on how to promote things on Google searches to lemmings/listeners via his TalkSnit Shows (same lemmings that are now staunch NLA supporters & listeners). He was even posting these instructs on his websites & making YouTube videos, too. And, he's still a loser at it! Another Windsor epic failure to add to the pile. The really ironic part for me? Ginger never had to promote this blog. Not once. Real traffic, visits made by repeated readers are why it "pops" up in Google searches. Funnier? Is that Windsor promotes it now & even links it to his "I'm being cyber stalked & bullied" whiny Facebook posts! bawahahahahahaha! That is just FacePalm Sunday ignorant. Derrrrrrrr.... His lemmings are so goofy, most would've never known about Ginger's blog ever! Even after Windsor blathers about it, links it for them? They think it's Ginger & the readers/commenters on this blog that are suing Bill! Stalking their hero! They are so goofy they don't really bother to read his or anyone else's stuff! They don't get it that he drives from state to state, lurking, stalking those he believes to be a *Joey*! They might not take too kindly to the likes of Bill doing those activities to them, especially that nugget Nick Marrs. I hope Nick doesn't piss Bill off & Bill never 'turns' on Nick. Nick makes no secret how he'd handle a stalker. Nick is a scary, lemming wing nut that brags openly about his lethal arsenal. I notice most of Windsor's Facebook activity is late at night & has numerous edits done to each. He must live like a vampire, posting in the dark of night, in between whipping out volumes of Motions to various courts & catching a few winks during the daylight hours. Oh, those golden retirement years! An entire lifetime's achievement! Windsor's reaping the rewards of his, now! It showing, too. No travel photos, no hobbies, no cute grandkid's pictures, no friends checking in. Nope. Just posts about his supposed haters made from midnight to 6am. *shudders* #creepy #stalker #whackadoodle #eldervampire
Poor Billy. Like Dirty Harry says, "A man's gotta know his limitations." On the other hand, there's very little evidence to prove Bill Windsor is a man--what with the all his fits and tantrums he's more of a little kid than a man.
NB, Well done on your yeoman's work in mining Billy's Talkshoe shows!
Anon 3:54 -- You're right on target but haven't hit it yet, so I'll help out a bit--you were suggesting it was Bill and not Gingersnap who made the Joeys famous or infamous, and that phenomenon is formally known as The Streisand Effect-- whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet.
Bill's spinning is amping up, again, for tonight. Barely dark, too, CST! Cute photos he's using, per se. That's Bills new buzz phrase: PER SE He's had oodles of buzz phrases. Let's try to recall a few of our favs while the spin cycles to full spun. Cease and Desist! Cease and Desist! And ABATE! (Flemming's attorney lobbed that Abate back so hard recently, it most likely won't be uttered again by Bill) Charged with _____
My favorite Billy phrase is "and more." He has a habit of hooking it onto every list, eg, the Joey's are guilty of cyberstalking, basket-weaving, slander, libel, bad house-keeping, and more! I've always wondered what other crimes he wants to charge because the range is rather wide--from jaywalking to genocide--I'm sure he'd say "ALL OF THEM!"
LOL! he's 65.5 years old, and he STILL fails to differentiate between a tort and a crime--he uses the terms interchangeably! That's my definition of stupidity PER SE!
Thanks to Special Agent Prehn , I found the Joey's ... via his whiny posts crying about the Joey's & a link to this blog. I have no clue who this fat man is that claims he's suing me for commenting about Marty ( who I do know ) on here. If anyone made people aware of the Joey's or got people to read this blog it was this fat man's friend and Regional Director, Special Agent Marty Prehn.
I forgot to mention in my above comment, I never posted/commented anything here about this fat man who is suing me, I don't know who he is ... how can he sue me when I never commented about him? Pretty egostical of this strange fat man to think everyone and every comment on here are/were about him, unless he is saying he's suing me for my comments about Marty .. I'd say he's full of crap.
"Tim Vawter- Bill it is vital you find out who was paying these perps and defamators. These questions can be asked in Interrogatories. Also see if you can get the prosecutors office to investigate who was paying them, because interference with your work reporting corruption can violate Chapter 73 federal Obstruction laws"
Another Conspiracy nut who thinks were getting paid. This is the 3rd one. Hey Tim, I comment for free not paid. My pay is knowing that a silly movement named Lawless America Association has been diverted if not stopped for now.
Yeah, that baffles me. Why is it they can't imagine that most of the 99% don't want a "revolution" of any kind and use their rights to FREEdom of speech? Some have very good imaginations - you'd think that might cross their minds.
The only one who was making any money was Windsor. He stopped his own "exposure of corruption" for the lemmings to work on his own agenda. Makes no difference how he wants to spin it, if anyone donated even a dollar, he made money because he hasn't produced any results. He can say it was all a loss, and write it off, but that is simply a justification. Money was donated for a specific reason, and that reason has not materialized.
Paid "cyberstalkers." HA! What a fricken joke. But in the land of the lemmings the truth would be too harsh of a blow to their pea brains and conspiracy excuses.
yep - he said many times the movie was being completely financed by donations. It appears donations made until 9/13 were just to finance Bill's trip around the country. Did he quit his road trip because donations dried up or to chase "cyberstalkers"? Either way, it's not a result of people making comments on a blog.
And about the cyberstalker thing - I'm still trying to figure out how reading stuff somebody posted on the internet, with intent to dominate and become mainstream media = cyberstalking. Did he think ONLY his followers would read it?
As I see it, Windsor made a conscious decision, on his own, to stop his efforts. A blog has not interfered in his "business." You think the President would stop doing what he's doing because of some bad internet criticism? Bahahahahaha Man, that is rich!!
Just how effective does he think he is, if he can't handle opposition to his agenda? It is so clear what he is trying to do now, in suing. I think he is trying to get the publicity he couldn't get before for his "Revolution." I bet he thinks if he sues Google, Facebook, thousands of "doe's" some journalist will finally grab hold of the story and thrust him into the spot light he has been so desperately trying to get into for years.
But, I would imagine that since the economy is so bad right now, if people understand they are footing the bill for his attempts at grand media exposure, he will be met with even more opposition than that of some internet bloggers. He thinks people don't agree or like what he's doing now? He's probably in for the rudest awakening ever! There are far less lemmings than hard working, honest people who don't take too kindly to his types.
I also see Nick Marrs the one that told Bill... "I've got one thing to say, you have sufficient and justifiable right to shoot and kill this creep if he is stupid enough to show his face! shoot first Bill, it's your only option and shoot to kill!"
He was telling Bill this when he left to go to see Boushie with his flak Jacket.
The fact that Mr. I live on Mars states that Bill has a "justifiable right," shows that when Windsor simply writes something as fact, they all believe it without any proof. How moronic.
Mars is the type of assrag that raises & fights roosters. He's a real brainiac. If he doesn't involve violence or cruelty? Mars is in over his intelligence.
I think Windsor forgets the burden of proof in on the Plaintiff. He is going to have to prove he is not any of the things he is whining about, he can't simply say he isn't. A "sworn affidavit" isn't enough proof either. He needs to consider exactly what might be required of him by the court to "prove" something was defamatory. Think really hard Windsor...
Bill seems to have skipped an important step. He can't prove the identity of any of the posters. Being given a name by an anonymous Facebook user isn't going to cut it.
You ever think it occurred to Windsor, that being a type of public figure, the statements he's made about people will bite him in the ass? He clearly has defamed regular people repeatedly, without proof of whom it is he is defaming. I really think he is so blinded by rage and vengeance he can't seem to get that he is way in over his head here in that he has done far worse than what he is trying to blame others for. I believe there is a big difference in attacking "little people" with false statements vs opinions from little people about a public figure.
First he has to prove the defendant made the statement. That's going to be a little tricky since he is relying on the accuracy of information provided to him by fake FB accounts. And, so far we aren't talking about "statements", we are talking about opinions.
Just ignore "it" NB. I know why I wrote what I wrote, and she doesn't. She has no idea what has been filed for Windsor to prove up. Not going to say more, as she won't understand it anyway, so just laugh at how out of the loop she is, and stupid her comments were.
TROLL ALERT...TROLL POSTING ON BLOG...DO NOT FEED THE TROLL!...THE TROLL IS NOT YOUR FRIEND!
April 7, 2014 at 12:31 PM
@anon 11:55: " yet when she is ask to provide the examples, she can't or won't."
WON'T. What in the world makes you think I would give you that kind of information? What don't you get about the fact that I am not here to HELP the GENII?
March 5 2013 after 4:30 is your proof, on this Blog..... but make up more lies to make yourself feel good, you are sometime no better then ILL Bill in posting lies about people to make yourself feel better
"The "Tit for Tat" defense is not available here. What he may or may not have done to other people is irrelevant. The defendants' task is to prove that what they said was true. There is no "But he deserved it" defense"
lol, it's actually up to the plaintiff to prove, lol Snoozie apparently doesn't know how to read anything, google or bing that shit
I'm going to walk the plank, and agree with part of what Susan said. (Splash) Part, people, PART. Lololol.
Bill is plaintiff. Plaintiffs bear the burden of proof. But if he accomplishes his burden, when hell freezes over, then she's right. The defendants are the ones that will have to do the proving.
Bill sues so and so. He claims so and so called him a pedophile. He claims it hurt his reputation. He has to prove that so and so actually said it, that they hurt his reputation, and that they were being meanie heads when they said it. If he accomplishes that, then the defendant that said it has to prove that he actually is a pedophile. Either that, or take the defamation rap. It's not Bill that has to prove he ISN'T a pedophile. It's the person that said it, that has to prove he IS a pedophile.
Same for every one of his gazillion claims. For me, he has it easy. He knows who I am, and I'm willing to admit the things I said. I deny, of course, all the crap I never said or did, but he gets to skip some steps in my case. At least on the stuff I admit to. So it will be easy for him to prove I said "blah blah". He just has to show that I meant it maliciously. Then if he accomplishes that, I must either take the rap of defamation or prove the things I said were true. (Or that I really believed them to be true). I personally think he's toast, even if he gets that far, so I'm not defending him here. I'm just saying court is court, and none of our "but he..." will work unless we use it in the right context at the right time. In the middle of our defense of his specific defamation claims, isn't it. I'm prepared to prove he is what I claimed. It just has to make it that far, and so far all he can muster is spin cycle, not take off.
The thing about there being no "but he deserved it" defense, is also true. If you are in court arguing whether you defamed Bill or not, the court can't take into consideration that he defamed you first. He sued you, not the other way around. I differ though, that I think his track record can be used to a defendants advantage. He runs around laying the groundwork himself. If used correctly, that groundwork can build a case. (But not help in defense of his specific defamation claims).
the main part is the reputation part, he had no outstanding reputation to begin with, that I am aware of, so no one hurt his reputation, if he had a reputation, it was lost during the MOM courtsuit, the pedophile part, no one with the blog, that I am aware of said that, that was the AMPP who started that, so that then would be on them
I don't think it was even AMPP that started that. There was one mother who probably said that. She's said it about her own ex, her friend's exes, and her friend's father. She tends to throw the word around. He responded by posting his "I am a pedophile" video. AMPP then started mocking it by quoting him as saying that.
Personally, most of what Bill has directly quoted from the blog isn't going to be hard to prove as true or a matter of opinion and/or not reputation/career damaging to Bill.
The pedophile thing was just an easy example to help me get my point across. I wasn't saying anyone here did it. Change "pedophile" to "monkey fucker", same point.
It doesn't really matter what word is used to make a point - what's going on in MO, KS and MT are whole different animals that what's happening in TX. No matter how Bill and/or other want it all to be the same
Bill sues so and so. He claims so and so called him a pedophile. He claims it hurt his reputation. He has to prove that so and so actually said it, that they hurt his reputation, and that they were being meanie heads when they said it.
Not exactly. Plaintiff must prove actual malice too--that the defendant knew or should have known the statement was published as a fact and it was false. Note, actual malice is not just common law malice!
If Bill's only pedophile claim is against the video, then he's going to have a problem. Any reasonable person would consider the video as nothing more than rhetorical hyperbole--it's a parody based on opinion, and therefore protected under the 1st Amendment.
Lastly, if, as a matter of law, Windsor is determined to be a limited-purpose public figure, he won't be able to recover being "butthurt", ie, that he felt severe emotional distress over the defamatory publication. On the other hand, if he is ruled a private party, he may be able to recover damages. In sum, the notion that all "meanie headed" comments are always actionable is not correct.
@ 3:02, yes, I agree. That's what I meant by the meanie head comment. I figured if I explained it, I'd get some brainiac rebuttal that I was trying to give law lessons. But ya, I agree with you on the meanie head/malice thing. Also agree on the limited public figure thing.
California is coming up in 2 days, I wonder if he has already started out that way: Case CIV526302 - WILLIAM M WINDSOR VS FACEBOOK INC 04/16/2014 9:00 AM DEPT. 7 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Word at the water cooler is that Windsor didn't serve the right place for Facebook. Hopefully someone in their legal dept. gets wind of what he's doing to Google, so they understand the lengths the vexatious litigant always goes to in these cases.
Motion Hearing Scheduled Scheduled For: 04/22/2014; 9:00 AM ; DENNIS ALLEN ROLF; Lafayette Notice of Hearing Filed Non Party Deponent Casey Hargrove files a Notice of HearingMotion to Quash Subpoena of Casey Hargrove and Clyde Hargrove on 4-22-14 at 9:00 am. (2 pages faxed) Motion to Quash Non Party Deponent Casey Hargrove files a Motion to Quash Subpoena of Casey Hargrove and Clyde Hargrove. (3 pages faxed)
OK, show of hands - how many people posting here are seeking fame?
LMAO - this one has it all bassackwards and she's calling a lawyer to help Bill.
Susan Ann Carlson These pitiful people are seeking their seconds of fame by stating lying bull shit about a decent person attempting to change a system that is wrecking little children to senior citizen's lives. They are disgusting and far below worthless. It is their game, and they do deserve to be punished, but you are worth so much more than them for what your goal was. Somehow, the cease and desist has to happen for you to be free of carrying such a pack of manure on your back!!!! They are nickel and diming you with their sickness, when you are worth so much more to what you wanted to achieve. I am going to call that DC/author lawyer and see if he can help.
LOL that is funny. The only person I know of who is seeking seconds of fame would be the man who made his own Wiki page, IMDB, manipulated search engines to pick up all his crap, ran for two offices, proclaimed he was the leader of the up and coming "Revolutionary Party" etc. hahahaha
The only one who is nickel and diming anyone is him. Collecting donations, and now nickel and diming tax payers to foot the bill for the law suits HE filed.
And what laws did he change again? How has he positively effected any change in the system again? How did his stated goals for reform differ from that of other SC's who failed again? Bahahahahah The only "manure on his back" is the manour he packed himself and litters the courts with.
I read that he used to be an entrepreneur, or his father was; however, I can't find anything that suggests he is currently a legit, money-making entrepreneur. What does BW doing for income, these days?
His last post on Facebook: "GINGER SNAP ON JOEYISALITTLEKID WEBSITE HAS REPEATEDLY DEFAMED ME IN MY PROFESSION."
"Cynthia Elias Yes, lawsuit may stop that particular Perp, but more will follow...i see potential for Bill being inundated with slander lawsuits everywhere which i would think is labor intensive...his mission is to get his movie out to help us victims and show America hidden ugliness to compel change, right? Perhaps get the movie out then go after the naysayers and slanderers. Like · 2 hours ago"
Full moon spin is starting even earlier today! This spinning habit is gonna dink around & ruin his vampirish middle of the night outraged Facebook posts! And wth? MaryD? No one here EVER threatened you!! If anything at all? We tried to advise you to "R U N" from Windsor! To use more #DeepWoodsOFF I suppose since everyone that reads here &/or comments here is a Joey? Everyone that reads or posts on Windsor's stuff? Is Windsor. If each of 'us' must be responsible for everyone else's comments & opinions posted on this blog? Everyone on Windsor's posts is responsible for ALL the other comments & opinions. MaryD must agree wholeheartedly with Nick Marrs' suggestions & opinions, as well as Nancy Figat's & any others. #AllTheSame
Just imagine if Windsor is all butthurt now over DC being described as a flop, a failure? What is his level of butthurt outrage gonna be when he realizes how much hilarity was had during his flap jacket fiasco in MT? As slow as he's reading though? We may all die of old age before he ever gets to those! I've seen little Ned in the 1st grade cover more words in a day than Bill seems to be! #slowreader #EvelynWoodSpeedReadingHelp
WTH is he babbling about? I thought he was trying to convince us that Curtis had outed everyone the other day, in hopes for some "plea deal?" Now, how would fat pie boy not know where he was until now? I highly doubt he really knows where he is, and this is yet another spinner attempt at a intimidation. He's all about intimidating people, just look at the standard repeat line down at the bottom of all his pompous posts about blah, blah, is "per se" such and such. ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
In our public school district, elderly/retired citizens volunteer 2-3 hours per week to read out loud to small groups of elementary students. The idea is for the adults to read aloud to them & then the students read aloud to the group & adult. Thank Gawd Windsor is far too busy being vexi & has this Facebook vendetta going & would never dare contribute community service such as reading or comprehension improvement to young readers!!! Shitfire! He can't read at 1st grade level evidently & has requested a dumb down of what's going on in the Ellis County case in Texas from the judge!
That's an F = epic fail
Community service in my community is forever thankful! Whew!
word
ReplyDeleteBill Windsor changed his cover photo.
6 hours ago · Edited
XXXXXXXX ADMITS JOEYISALITTLEKID WEBSITE HAS WRITTEN BILL WINDSOR'S OBITUARY AND DESTROYED HIS NAME BY GOOGLE BOMBING HIM.
In this published statement on Joeyisalittlekid.BlogSpot.com, the infamous "Ginger Snap" admits that the Joeyisalittlekid website's intent was to destroy me. They published one false, defamatory statement after another in hundreds of articles so they would achieve prominence in the search engines.
This and other evidence in their own published words is fabulous proof of their motive, the animosity, and the malice of these vicious cyberstalkers.
I have determined that Ginger Snap is actually XXXXXX of Red Oak, Texas. I have given XXXXXX and his father, XXXXXxX, the opportunity to say under oath that XXXXXX is not Ginger Snap. There has been no denial.
It is sadly true that the Joeyisalittlekid gang has destroyed my name. They achieved their stated goal. Now everyone who has published on that site is a defendant in William M. Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et al. And everyone who has participated in destroying my name should now be held jointly and severally liable for what they and all the others wrote. I hope the jury in Ellis County Texas throws the book at them.
If Joeyisalittlekid continues to publish this stuff, I believe everyone on there is just as guilty as XXXXXXXXX for saying this. I have told them: CEASE AND DESIST. I have requested corrections and retractions. But they just keep it up.
Wow. Bill has sure has his panties in a wad about what Gingersnap said. And, of course anybody posting on the blog is guilty, because he wants people to quit talking about him and they just won’t stop. Bill’s post is riddled with irony. As Bill knows, readership is a major factor for driving a site up in the search engines. So, how much of the issue did he cause all by himself? He advertised the site, posted the link too many times to count and demanded his followers read the all the garbage posted on the site.
ReplyDeleteNowhere in that comment did Gingersnap say or indicate motive, animosity, malice or effort by anyone to boost the blog to the top of search engines. Gingersnap merely stated an opinion as to how Bill’s effort to dominate the internet was not exactly what Bill had in mind when he started to manipulate search engines.
The most ironic part is Bill is falsely accusing Gingersnap of doing exactly what Bill did for anybody that sent him $15 – he attempted to destroy the names of sitting judges. And recently he’s done the same to anyone that crossed him.
What goes around, comes around. Like most emotionally stunted people, he cannot take what he dishes out.
This Talkshoe is with Crystal Cox. The entire show is about the tricks used to manipulate search engines. They talk about web sites set up in the name of their targets, to “expose” them.
http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-115884/TS-580790.mp3
Excerpts from: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-115884/TS-586670.mp3 - Start 1:18:47
DeleteFemale Caller: I, I need some ah help, I need to make you a file showing that um evidence in the judge’s name so that you post that saying that you can be corrupt and it what it gets you is a promotion.
Bill Windsor: Yeah, for everybody, if you, if you haven’t sent me something to post about your judge or whoever it may be, I, I am just continuing to be amazed at how much Google loves Lawless America.com. Because we are now getting things indexed within 12 hours.
Female Caller: say that again, I didn’t understand
Kpat: Wow that is, that is the best news I have heard in a month.
Female caller: I don’t know what he said, I didn’t understand.
Bill Windsor: Well, the search engines, um - then explains how search engines work to female caller, pointing out readership is one thing that drives search engines.
@ 1:20:51
Bill Windsor: So like when Pat reported the thing about uh Judge Jerry W Baxter getting the horse’s ass of the year award it was on there within 24 hours, now I’ve got things going on there within 12 hours.
Kpat: Wow.
Bill Windsor: The point is the site is loved by Google especially, and Yahoo too but Google is even better. And so if somebody sends me something on a judge, it’s going to be up there. We did this one judge David P Darden or something just the other day and now we’re number 4 and 5 on the search results. I think, was it, Pat was it you who said…
Kpat: yeah, it was number 1 when I checked that out
Bill Windsor: Larry Hohal (sp?) said the same thing, he put it in quotes or whatever and came up number 1. So, uh, the thing is sent it to me let me get it on because then we’re going to have these guys uh, uh exposed. You look on there now, there is nothing negative about them. And as soon as I get to them, then you’ve got the negative.
And this one looks a little like a conspiracy, for which motive, animosity, and malice are clear, IMO: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-115884/TS-594562.mp3 - Start 1:38
DeleteBill Windsor: One thing we can absolutely do is if, if enough of us would toss 15 bucks into the pot per person, we can set up a web site for each of these people and I can have them exposed within the top within the 4 or 5 search results within 24, 48 hours. So there is a donation box on, we’ve never gotten a donation but there is one on Lawless America.com. Anybody who still has some money, I know that’s (unintelligible, people laughing). If there is still anyone out there has some money, ah, go on there and donate some money. And I will take every penny that gets donated and I will start buying these people’s domain names. And ah, you know I mean if somebody could toss 150 bucks in there we could get all these guys. And then, ah, I will, I will be delighted to be the person whose name is on it. And I’ll put the little stories out there. I’ll put a little I believe or whatever in there. Ah, or in my opinion or based upon what I’ve read but the headlines will be that these people are charged with corruption. And that will stand up real big and bold so that somebody goes to look up one of these lawyers or the judge that’s being considered to be the head of the law school they’ll see these things. And then if people will just do the simple little things that I’ll put out and ask, this thing will completely flood the internet. And it, we will be the mainstream media on this issue. And so I’m, I’m prepared, I’m going to do all that regardless so if anybody has any money, ah, you can go on, it’s a PayPal thing, ah, you know do some PayPal credits or do some money and we’ll get web sites for all these people. That’s something we ought to do for sure because we can do that.
John Margetis: I want to go ahead and mention two judges so they get their due justice here also. Ah, Bob Carroll who is now the 40th District Judge, is the absolute crook that started this corrupt, fraudulent judgment against my mother and I. And the new appointed judge, he got asked to step down by the state commission on judicial conduct, then Greg Wilhelm stepped in his place. So I just want to make sure, you know, Stacy Jernigan, ah, Royal Ferguson, Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm get the exposure that they’re due.
Bill Windsor: Alright. Mary, I’m going to leave it to you, whatever you name is (laughing). Whatever your name is tonight or will be tomorrow, I would like you to be in charge of getting me the list of all the players.
Mary: I will do that. And a write up on each one.
Bill Windsor: Good. And if you would, ah
Mary: Would you like a copy of what I said today?
Bill Windsor: Go ahead.
Mary: Would you like just a copy of everything that…?
Bill Windsor: That will be fine and we’ve had a couple of other names that come up here late but ah, maybe they’re just in John’s case. But if you’ll get those to me, then I will, ah you know I’ll, I’ll probably just go on and buy these sites and charge…
George McDermott: Hey Bill?
Bill Windsor: yeah
George McDermott: I’ll , I, I, I got $45 coming to you for Jernigan, for, for ah Ferguson and for the chief judge, um that I mentioned in this letter to the 5th Circuit cause I’ve, it’s negligent standard of conduct. If she’s the chief judge and she should have taken action long before she embarrassed the entire Texas code.
Bill Windsor: yep, alright George
George McDermott: Edith Jones
Bill Windsor: Edith Jones
George McDermott: Chief Judge Edith H. Jones. And I’ll, I’ll, I’ll get you the money by tomorrow morning.
Bill Windsor: You want Jones, Ferguson and who?
George McDermott: Jones, Ferguson and um ah, the bankruptcy judge, ah, ah
John Margetis: Stacy Jernigan
George McDermott: Stacy Jernigan
John Margetis: Stacy Jernigan
Bill Windsor: Alright. I’ll buy Vogel.
John Margetis: Get Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm and I’ll, and Stacy Jernigan and I’ll, I’ll cover those.
DeleteBill Windsor: Alright. We’ve already got Jernigan, so you get Bob Carroll and Greg Wilhelm?
John Margetis: Yes.
Bill Windsor: OK. Alright. Uh well everybody else, throw in 15 bucks, we got more people to get. And uh, we should do the northern district of uh Texas. Uh, you know there’s a lot, a lot of different things other than just names but the names are very powerful. But we’re going to get some web stuff that’ll uh, that’ll uh spread this out.
George McDermott: You know the thing is we are doing a public service here because, because from now on people in northern district of Texas will be able to, if they want to find out what the judge is about or the court is about they’ll be able to just pull up these names and find out hold it, I don’t want these people on my case. You know I have every right to ask for recusal because, uh they’re uh named in a criminal conspiracy.
Bill Windsor: Yeah and, and uh I think, I will take it upon myself. I will write a letter to every judge in the northern district of Texas, I’ll write a letter to every federal judge in Texas. And uh give them a summary and ask them to take action on this. Then if they don’t take action we can consider that they all are guilty of misprision of felony 18 USC 4 because uh felonies were called to their attention and they didn’t report it to law enforcement. And who knows, maybe there is one of them out there that decides, hey we need to do something about this.
That's some pretty damning evidence, which you can always find the most damning comes directly out of the mouth of bill. He was offering a defamation for a fee job. His saying the "I believe or in my opinion" was proof he knew what he was doing. Defamation by search engine
DeleteAwesome information NBTDT!
DeleteExactly Ginger re "His saying the "I believe or in my opinion" was proof he knew what he was doing"
This is a infamous Windsor saying that he uses all the time too. He even uses it in his court filings. The fact that he has sunk his own battleship, seems to be his biggest bitch. He really can't stand that people keep posting his own words to prove what he denies.
I am not out to destroy Bills Personal Life but I am against stopping his movement which includes himself from further attempts at starting citizen Grand Juries that will put people all over the country on trial for treason and then execute them as punishment for the death penalty. However that gets done will never be seen since everyone who wanted a citizen Grand Jury has flocked to the National Liberty Alliance.
DeleteI have never threatened Bill. It is up to law enforcement after my complaints and thoughts on the matter to decide if he is crossing the line by planning these atrocious acts against people. He said before that they won’t wait for peaceful elections to start criminal trials buy citizen grand juries. I guess if it ever goes to a trial it is Bills Burden to convince the Jury that what I said, which was what he said is defamation, libel, and slander. I still am curious Bill why is it your Ex-Wife Barbara is listed as the Director of Lawless America Association? I Know it is because I just haven’t seen one email confirming that you emailed 10 people you could not have the corporation in your name, I have 2 of the people you sent this to now. Hmmm. The plot thickens. Forming corpations in others names to hide money that was being donated to Lawless America Association and if Maid of the Mist knew they could get that money from you. Psst. I have emailed the unsealing of the case to Maid of the Mist attorneys. I am sure they wanted to know about the case being unsealed.
Fleming: dude, you probably should have quit at the end of the first paragraph. As much as I hate to admit Allie had a point - I think what she was saying is, there is a difference between illegal and sleazy or shady. Some times people do things that are just flat wrong, but it isn't illegal. And belly bumping will just result in more belly bumping - it just delays a resolution.
DeleteYup. That's terrific that NBTDT was able to withstand hours of permanent ear damage to provide this verbatim ala Windsor. Thank you!
DeleteIt's that pesky "what goes on the internet, stays on the internet" snit, again. I have no doubts, that Windsor will spin out and spew how those hateful *Joeys* have taken his words out of context. Pfffffft!
What else is uber creepy to me? The timing of Windsor's Facebook posts. 5:00am CST? Ginger is consuming Windsor's thoughts so much during the pre-dawn hours of the morning, that it's worthy of a Facebook status update. Then an edit. Then another edit.
Windsor is slap dab eat up with the dumb ass. The obsessive, compulsive, liar, attention whore, pity party, boo hoo butthurt, stupid, dumb ass. For over a year he was giving step by step instructions on how to promote things on Google searches to lemmings/listeners via his TalkSnit Shows (same lemmings that are now staunch NLA supporters & listeners). He was even posting these instructs on his websites & making YouTube videos, too. And, he's still a loser at it! Another Windsor epic failure to add to the pile.
The really ironic part for me? Ginger never had to promote this blog. Not once. Real traffic, visits made by repeated readers are why it "pops" up in Google searches.
Funnier? Is that Windsor promotes it now & even links it to his "I'm being cyber stalked & bullied" whiny Facebook posts! bawahahahahahaha! That is just FacePalm Sunday ignorant. Derrrrrrrr....
His lemmings are so goofy, most would've never known about Ginger's blog ever! Even after Windsor blathers about it, links it for them? They think it's Ginger & the readers/commenters on this blog that are suing Bill! Stalking their hero! They are so goofy they don't really bother to read his or anyone else's stuff! They don't get it that he drives from state to state, lurking, stalking those he believes to be a *Joey*! They might not take too kindly to the likes of Bill doing those activities to them, especially that nugget Nick Marrs. I hope Nick doesn't piss Bill off & Bill never 'turns' on Nick. Nick makes no secret how he'd handle a stalker. Nick is a scary, lemming wing nut that brags openly about his lethal arsenal.
I notice most of Windsor's Facebook activity is late at night & has numerous edits done to each. He must live like a vampire, posting in the dark of night, in between whipping out volumes of Motions to various courts & catching a few winks during the daylight hours.
Oh, those golden retirement years! An entire lifetime's achievement! Windsor's reaping the rewards of his, now! It showing, too. No travel photos, no hobbies, no cute grandkid's pictures, no friends checking in. Nope. Just posts about his supposed haters made from midnight to 6am. *shudders*
#creepy #stalker #whackadoodle #eldervampire
Poor Billy. Like Dirty Harry says, "A man's gotta know his limitations."
DeleteOn the other hand, there's very little evidence to prove Bill Windsor is a man--what with the all his fits and tantrums he's more of a little kid than a man.
NB, Well done on your yeoman's work in mining Billy's Talkshoe shows!
Anon 3:54 -- You're right on target but haven't hit it yet, so I'll help out a bit--you were suggesting it was Bill and not Gingersnap who made the Joeys famous or infamous, and that phenomenon is formally known as The Streisand Effect-- whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet.
Thank you! That is exactly it! You're right!
DeleteYou're most welcome!
DeleteNow let's all sing along with Barbara...
¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
Memories...like the Talkshoes you left behind,
will tend to haunt and indite you, and prove you've lost you mind..."
¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
Bill's spinning is amping up, again, for tonight. Barely dark, too, CST!
ReplyDeleteCute photos he's using, per se.
That's Bills new buzz phrase: PER SE
He's had oodles of buzz phrases. Let's try to recall a few of our favs while the spin cycles to full spun.
Cease and Desist!
Cease and Desist! And ABATE! (Flemming's attorney lobbed that Abate back so hard recently, it most likely won't be uttered again by Bill)
Charged with _____
Now? Anyone? I missed a lot of good ones.
Next!
COLOR OF LAW!
DeleteMy favorite Billy phrase is "and more." He has a habit of hooking it onto every list, eg, the Joey's are guilty of cyberstalking, basket-weaving, slander, libel, bad house-keeping, and more! I've always wondered what other crimes he wants to charge because the range is rather wide--from jaywalking to genocide--I'm sure he'd say "ALL OF THEM!"
DeleteLMAO - basket weaving.
Delete"Absolutely" Like in, those Joeys and people that don't know they are Joeys have absolutely committed the crimes I've charged them with, and more.
Delete~ and ~
"Delighted" As in, I'll be delighted to sue you for basket weaving if you do not CEASE AND DESIST!
LOL! he's 65.5 years old, and he STILL fails to differentiate between a tort and a crime--he uses the terms interchangeably! That's my definition of stupidity PER SE!
Delete"In my humble opinion." - a common one for him, yet there isn't a drop of humble in that shell of a man.
DeleteHuh...so...every pie but humble, eh?
DeleteThanks to Special Agent Prehn , I found the Joey's ... via his whiny posts crying about the Joey's & a link to this blog. I have no clue who this fat man is that claims he's suing me for commenting about Marty ( who I do know ) on here. If anyone made people aware of the Joey's or got people to read this blog it was this fat man's friend and Regional Director, Special Agent Marty Prehn.
ReplyDeleteI forgot to mention in my above comment, I never posted/commented anything here about this fat man who is suing me, I don't know who he is ... how can he sue me when I never commented about him? Pretty egostical of this strange fat man to think everyone and every comment on here are/were about him, unless he is saying he's suing me for my comments about Marty .. I'd say he's full of crap.
DeleteWelcome to the 'I'm being sued elite'.
DeleteReally doesn't matter if you knew or commented about the strange fat mam or not (obviously)!
Waving~~~
Ha, ha Petunia ... (waves back, laughing)
DeleteThink of Marty as a subhuman billboard... but larger.
DeleteThe strange fat man should be suing Marty for damages.
Delete"Tim Vawter- Bill it is vital you find out who was paying these perps and defamators. These questions can be asked in Interrogatories. Also see if you can get the prosecutors office to investigate who was paying them, because interference with your work reporting corruption can violate Chapter 73 federal Obstruction laws"
ReplyDeleteAnother Conspiracy nut who thinks were getting paid. This is the 3rd one. Hey Tim, I comment for free not paid. My pay is knowing that a silly movement named Lawless America Association has been diverted if not stopped for now.
Yeah, that baffles me. Why is it they can't imagine that most of the 99% don't want a "revolution" of any kind and use their rights to FREEdom of speech? Some have very good imaginations - you'd think that might cross their minds.
DeleteThe only one who was making any money was Windsor. He stopped his own "exposure of corruption" for the lemmings to work on his own agenda. Makes no difference how he wants to spin it, if anyone donated even a dollar, he made money because he hasn't produced any results. He can say it was all a loss, and write it off, but that is simply a justification. Money was donated for a specific reason, and that reason has not materialized.
DeletePaid "cyberstalkers." HA! What a fricken joke. But in the land of the lemmings the truth would be too harsh of a blow to their pea brains and conspiracy excuses.
yep - he said many times the movie was being completely financed by donations. It appears donations made until 9/13 were just to finance Bill's trip around the country. Did he quit his road trip because donations dried up or to chase "cyberstalkers"? Either way, it's not a result of people making comments on a blog.
DeleteAnd about the cyberstalker thing - I'm still trying to figure out how reading stuff somebody posted on the internet, with intent to dominate and become mainstream media = cyberstalking. Did he think ONLY his followers would read it?
As I see it, Windsor made a conscious decision, on his own, to stop his efforts. A blog has not interfered in his "business." You think the President would stop doing what he's doing because of some bad internet criticism? Bahahahahaha Man, that is rich!!
DeleteJust how effective does he think he is, if he can't handle opposition to his agenda? It is so clear what he is trying to do now, in suing. I think he is trying to get the publicity he couldn't get before for his "Revolution." I bet he thinks if he sues Google, Facebook, thousands of "doe's" some journalist will finally grab hold of the story and thrust him into the spot light he has been so desperately trying to get into for years.
But, I would imagine that since the economy is so bad right now, if people understand they are footing the bill for his attempts at grand media exposure, he will be met with even more opposition than that of some internet bloggers. He thinks people don't agree or like what he's doing now? He's probably in for the rudest awakening ever! There are far less lemmings than hard working, honest people who don't take too kindly to his types.
I also see Nick Marrs the one that told Bill... "I've got one thing to say, you have sufficient and justifiable right to shoot and kill this creep if he is stupid enough to show his face! shoot first Bill, it's your only option and shoot to kill!"
ReplyDeleteHe was telling Bill this when he left to go to see Boushie with his flak Jacket.
The fact that Mr. I live on Mars states that Bill has a "justifiable right," shows that when Windsor simply writes something as fact, they all believe it without any proof. How moronic.
DeleteMars is the type of assrag that raises & fights roosters. He's a real brainiac. If he doesn't involve violence or cruelty? Mars is in over his intelligence.
DeleteI think Windsor forgets the burden of proof in on the Plaintiff. He is going to have to prove he is not any of the things he is whining about, he can't simply say he isn't. A "sworn affidavit" isn't enough proof either. He needs to consider exactly what might be required of him by the court to "prove" something was defamatory. Think really hard Windsor...
ReplyDeleteWell, isn't the affidavit signed by a notary? According to the SovCit's, that is his winning ticket in court.
DeleteBut, never fear: Bill's help is here!
Susan Harbison That one goes into the "evidence of malice" folder Bill.
Shocking, IMO, that this sharp legal eye does not take into consideration that Bill is posting opinions and comments taken out of context.
Bill seems to have skipped an important step. He can't prove the identity of any of the posters. Being given a name by an anonymous Facebook user isn't going to cut it.
DeleteYou ever think it occurred to Windsor, that being a type of public figure, the statements he's made about people will bite him in the ass? He clearly has defamed regular people repeatedly, without proof of whom it is he is defaming. I really think he is so blinded by rage and vengeance he can't seem to get that he is way in over his head here in that he has done far worse than what he is trying to blame others for. I believe there is a big difference in attacking "little people" with false statements vs opinions from little people about a public figure.
DeleteFirst he has to prove the defendant made the statement. That's going to be a little tricky since he is relying on the accuracy of information provided to him by fake FB accounts. And, so far we aren't talking about "statements", we are talking about opinions.
DeleteOh, PULLEESE go help Bill and get off this page!!!!! Your credibility, statements and opinions are worth as much as Bill's.
DeleteJust ignore "it" NB. I know why I wrote what I wrote, and she doesn't. She has no idea what has been filed for Windsor to prove up. Not going to say more, as she won't understand it anyway, so just laugh at how out of the loop she is, and stupid her comments were.
Delete@ 10:34 - thank you for the reminder. I should have been prepared for a response to pointing out "it's" failures.
Delete
DeleteI think Anon 9:51 is spot on.
TAEFR shared ILL Bill photo that she agrees with this statement "BILL WINDSOR IS SICK, EVIL, PERVERTED, AND A TERRORIST"
ReplyDeleteTROLL ALERT...TROLL POSTING ON BLOG...DO NOT FEED THE TROLL!...THE TROLL IS NOT YOUR FRIEND!
DeleteApril 7, 2014 at 12:31 PM
@anon 11:55:
" yet when she is ask to provide the examples, she can't or won't."
WON'T. What in the world makes you think I would give you that kind of information? What don't you get about the fact that I am not here to HELP the GENII?
March 5 2013 after 4:30 is your proof, on this Blog..... but make up more lies to make yourself feel good, you are sometime no better then ILL Bill in posting lies about people to make yourself feel better
Delete"The "Tit for Tat" defense is not available here. What he may or may not have done to other people is irrelevant. The defendants' task is to prove that what they said was true. There is no "But he deserved it" defense"
ReplyDeletelol, it's actually up to the plaintiff to prove, lol Snoozie apparently doesn't know how to read anything, google or bing that shit
Attention Langoliers...clean up on Aisle 6...
DeleteI'm going to walk the plank, and agree with part of what Susan said. (Splash) Part, people, PART. Lololol.
DeleteBill is plaintiff. Plaintiffs bear the burden of proof. But if he accomplishes his burden, when hell freezes over, then she's right. The defendants are the ones that will have to do the proving.
Bill sues so and so. He claims so and so called him a pedophile. He claims it hurt his reputation. He has to prove that so and so actually said it, that they hurt his reputation, and that they were being meanie heads when they said it. If he accomplishes that, then the defendant that said it has to prove that he actually is a pedophile. Either that, or take the defamation rap. It's not Bill that has to prove he ISN'T a pedophile. It's the person that said it, that has to prove he IS a pedophile.
Same for every one of his gazillion claims. For me, he has it easy. He knows who I am, and I'm willing to admit the things I said. I deny, of course, all the crap I never said or did, but he gets to skip some steps in my case. At least on the stuff I admit to. So it will be easy for him to prove I said "blah blah". He just has to show that I meant it maliciously. Then if he accomplishes that, I must either take the rap of defamation or prove the things I said were true. (Or that I really believed them to be true). I personally think he's toast, even if he gets that far, so I'm not defending him here. I'm just saying court is court, and none of our "but he..." will work unless we use it in the right context at the right time. In the middle of our defense of his specific defamation claims, isn't it. I'm prepared to prove he is what I claimed. It just has to make it that far, and so far all he can muster is spin cycle, not take off.
The thing about there being no "but he deserved it" defense, is also true. If you are in court arguing whether you defamed Bill or not, the court can't take into consideration that he defamed you first. He sued you, not the other way around. I differ though, that I think his track record can be used to a defendants advantage. He runs around laying the groundwork himself. If used correctly, that groundwork can build a case. (But not help in defense of his specific defamation claims).
Don't shoot me. [Hands over head, eyes squinting]
the main part is the reputation part, he had no outstanding reputation to begin with, that I am aware of, so no one hurt his reputation, if he had a reputation, it was lost during the MOM courtsuit, the pedophile part, no one with the blog, that I am aware of said that, that was the AMPP who started that, so that then would be on them
DeleteI don't think it was even AMPP that started that. There was one mother who probably said that. She's said it about her own ex, her friend's exes, and her friend's father. She tends to throw the word around. He responded by posting his "I am a pedophile" video. AMPP then started mocking it by quoting him as saying that.
DeletePersonally, most of what Bill has directly quoted from the blog isn't going to be hard to prove as true or a matter of opinion and/or not reputation/career damaging to Bill.
The pedophile thing was just an easy example to help me get my point across. I wasn't saying anyone here did it. Change "pedophile" to "monkey fucker", same point.
DeleteIt doesn't really matter what word is used to make a point - what's going on in MO, KS and MT are whole different animals that what's happening in TX. No matter how Bill and/or other want it all to be the same
DeleteBill sues so and so. He claims so and so called him a pedophile. He claims it hurt his reputation. He has to prove that so and so actually said it, that they hurt his reputation, and that they were being meanie heads when they said it.
DeleteNot exactly. Plaintiff must prove actual malice too--that the defendant knew or should have known the statement was published as a fact and it was false. Note, actual malice is not just common law malice!
If Bill's only pedophile claim is against the video, then he's going to have a problem. Any reasonable person would consider the video as nothing more than rhetorical hyperbole--it's a parody based on opinion, and therefore protected under the 1st Amendment.
Lastly, if, as a matter of law, Windsor is determined to be a limited-purpose public figure, he won't be able to recover being "butthurt", ie, that he felt severe emotional distress over the defamatory publication. On the other hand, if he is ruled a private party, he may be able to recover damages. In sum, the notion that all "meanie headed" comments are always actionable is not correct.
@ 3:02, yes, I agree. That's what I meant by the meanie head comment. I figured if I explained it, I'd get some brainiac rebuttal that I was trying to give law lessons. But ya, I agree with you on the meanie head/malice thing. Also agree on the limited public figure thing.
DeleteOh great...I walked into that one...you left me to put up with some brainiac rebuttal! (I kid, I kid). :-)
DeleteLOL.
Deleteyou were giving law lessons?
DeleteNope.
DeleteCalifornia is coming up in 2 days, I wonder if he has already started out that way:
ReplyDeleteCase CIV526302 - WILLIAM M WINDSOR VS FACEBOOK INC
04/16/2014 9:00 AM DEPT. 7 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Wouldn't it be awesome if it were department 19 rather than 7, with the Honorable Socrates Manoukian?
DeleteHellz yah it would be! That would be some sweet karma right there.
DeleteWord at the water cooler is that Windsor didn't serve the right place for Facebook. Hopefully someone in their legal dept. gets wind of what he's doing to Google, so they understand the lengths the vexatious litigant always goes to in these cases.
DeleteNew filing and hearing in MO.
ReplyDeleteMotion Hearing Scheduled
Scheduled For: 04/22/2014; 9:00 AM ; DENNIS ALLEN ROLF; Lafayette
Notice of Hearing Filed
Non Party Deponent Casey Hargrove files a Notice of HearingMotion to Quash Subpoena of Casey Hargrove and Clyde Hargrove on 4-22-14 at 9:00 am. (2 pages faxed)
Motion to Quash
Non Party Deponent Casey Hargrove files a Motion to Quash Subpoena of Casey Hargrove and Clyde Hargrove. (3 pages faxed)
I bet Dennis is extra excited. lol
DeleteOK, show of hands - how many people posting here are seeking fame?
ReplyDeleteLMAO - this one has it all bassackwards and she's calling a lawyer to help Bill.
Susan Ann Carlson These pitiful people are seeking their seconds of fame by stating lying bull shit about a decent person attempting to change a system that is wrecking little children to senior citizen's lives. They are disgusting and far below worthless. It is their game, and they do deserve to be punished, but you are worth so much more than them for what your goal was. Somehow, the cease and desist has to happen for you to be free of carrying such a pack of manure on your back!!!! They are nickel and diming you with their sickness, when you are worth so much more to what you wanted to achieve. I am going to call that DC/author lawyer and see if he can help.
LOL that is funny. The only person I know of who is seeking seconds of fame would be the man who made his own Wiki page, IMDB, manipulated search engines to pick up all his crap, ran for two offices, proclaimed he was the leader of the up and coming "Revolutionary Party" etc. hahahaha
DeleteThe only one who is nickel and diming anyone is him. Collecting donations, and now nickel and diming tax payers to foot the bill for the law suits HE filed.
And what laws did he change again? How has he positively effected any change in the system again? How did his stated goals for reform differ from that of other SC's who failed again? Bahahahahah The only "manure on his back" is the manour he packed himself and litters the courts with.
Sad, truly sad. Seems the lemmings have only "Pie and Prejudice" and no Pride.
DeleteThis just in from Missoula, MT...
ReplyDeleteWindsor's motion to unseal MoM case out the 11th Federal District has been DENIED. (Reason: MT court has no authority in GA). Poor Billy.
Besides which GA has no interest in seeing the MOM documents. smh
ReplyDeleteBawahahahahaha bawahahahahaha hiccup bwahahaha!
DeleteThe puns are endless, just like Big Vexi's motions & social media updates!
Ugh, @2:23 I meant to say MT has no interest in seeing the MOM case.
DeleteWhat is BWs profession; perhaps the better question would be what BW thinks his profession is…
ReplyDeleteHe's a serial entrePIEneur.
Delete"entrePIEneur" - Lol!
DeleteI read that he used to be an entrepreneur, or his father was; however, I can't find anything that suggests he is currently a legit, money-making entrepreneur. What does BW doing for income, these days?
His last post on Facebook: "GINGER SNAP ON JOEYISALITTLEKID WEBSITE HAS REPEATEDLY DEFAMED ME IN MY PROFESSION."
"Cynthia Elias Yes, lawsuit may stop that particular Perp, but more will follow...i see potential for Bill being inundated with slander lawsuits everywhere which i would think is labor intensive...his mission is to get his movie out to help us victims and show America hidden ugliness to compel change, right? Perhaps get the movie out then go after the naysayers and slanderers.
ReplyDeleteLike · 2 hours ago"
Full moon spin is starting even earlier today!
ReplyDeleteThis spinning habit is gonna dink around & ruin his vampirish middle of the night outraged Facebook posts!
And wth? MaryD? No one here EVER threatened you!! If anything at all? We tried to advise you to "R U N" from Windsor! To use more #DeepWoodsOFF
I suppose since everyone that reads here &/or comments here is a Joey? Everyone that reads or posts on Windsor's stuff? Is Windsor. If each of 'us' must be responsible for everyone else's comments & opinions posted on this blog? Everyone on Windsor's posts is responsible for ALL the other comments & opinions. MaryD must agree wholeheartedly with Nick Marrs' suggestions & opinions, as well as Nancy Figat's & any others. #AllTheSame
Just imagine if Windsor is all butthurt now over DC being described as a flop, a failure? What is his level of butthurt outrage gonna be when he realizes how much hilarity was had during his flap jacket fiasco in MT?
As slow as he's reading though? We may all die of old age before he ever gets to those! I've seen little Ned in the 1st grade cover more words in a day than Bill seems to be! #slowreader #EvelynWoodSpeedReadingHelp
Retardis 2015
DeleteLOL @ your #'s.
DeleteWTH is he babbling about? I thought he was trying to convince us that Curtis had outed everyone the other day, in hopes for some "plea deal?" Now, how would fat pie boy not know where he was until now? I highly doubt he really knows where he is, and this is yet another spinner attempt at a intimidation. He's all about intimidating people, just look at the standard repeat line down at the bottom of all his pompous posts about blah, blah, is "per se" such and such. ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Classic, Sluggo. Classic.
DeleteLMAO re: #EvelynWoodSpeedReadingHelp
DeleteIn our public school district, elderly/retired citizens volunteer 2-3 hours per week to read out loud to small groups of elementary students. The idea is for the adults to read aloud to them & then the students read aloud to the group & adult.
DeleteThank Gawd Windsor is far too busy being vexi & has this Facebook vendetta going & would never dare contribute community service such as reading or comprehension improvement to young readers!!!
Shitfire! He can't read at 1st grade level evidently & has requested a dumb down of what's going on in the Ellis County case in Texas from the judge!
That's an F = epic fail
Community service in my community is forever thankful!
Whew!
#EvelynWoodSpeedReadingHelp
#SeeBillReadSlow
#SeeBillNotComprehend
#DontLookEthel
#TheStreak
DeleteLol bill would do anything to find me. Although he is still throwing darts at a map
Delete