Tuesday, April 1, 2014

National Liberty Alliance Says April Fool


John Darash and his domestic terrorist group, National Liberty Alliance, had set the date of April 7th as the day they would "flood the court" and assume control of the legal and judicial system in New York.  Well before this Me the People group takes over the country, well they ran into a road block.  Seems the court clerk didn't file their papers timely and we must now wait till the 22nd (tentatively) to "take our Country back".  The NLA is also having trouble removing people who want to be removed from their email list.

Nevertheless, once these issues are ironed out, there is nothing left to stop them from taking back their country.  Darash plans to accomplish this by taking "charges" to the local sheriff, he then assumes that the sheriff will take him up on those charges and arrest people.  If the sheriff refuses, they will indict the sheriff and then go to the under sheriff with the same threat.  The ironic part is these people are trying to take us back to the King of England days all in the name of liberty.   They have decided to give themselves the ultimate power of the people and claim that they, the few nut-cases playing dress up, will decide the law. They plan to get their point across by doing things such as when the "all rise" order is given when the judge comes to the bench, they plan to stay seated.

Darash said its time to drawn a line in the sand and cross over it.  When callers ask him about what happens when they refuse to take action and ignore his little made up indictment, John said he can't talk about it but he has plans after that.  He also alluded to a super secret corporate charter.....but quickly had the class repeat the first two rules of fight club.  The court clerk may have given Darash a reprieve from incarceration, but his time in prison seems to be close at hand with his current course of impersonating a somebody.

229 comments:

  1. These guys are scary. I think they want to take us back to 1215. Darash references the Magna Carta in his lectures. The Constitution Club posted the Magna Carta last fall (members include Carl Swennson and several CC2009 delegates - one of their blog talks featured NLA).

    http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think they made the SPLC's 2014 list of hate groups.

      Delete
    2. They addressed them but as a terrorist group in relation to their planned citizen grand jury stunt.

      Delete
    3. Seinfeld ...She named name: http://youtu.be/QaTbErVDQ40

      Delete
    4. I didn't find anything on the SPLC site re: Darash or NLA. Google searches bring up several sites saying the SPLC named them as a hate group. The ADL called Darash a sovereign citizen, to which he took exception.

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/24/tea-party-leader-says-group-seeks-to-marginalize-him-with-sovereign-citizen/

      Delete
    5. yeah it was the ADL that addressed them: http://blog.adl.org/tags/national-liberty-alliance

      Delete
    6. SPLC sends out press releases in advance of their publications in print and on the website. They do work in concert with ADL and ACLU.

      Delete
    7. This is the only relative press release I found - it refers to SovCit/militias as hate groups but doesn't name any.

      http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/splc-report-far-right-extremist-groups-decline-but-remain-at-near-record-levels

      Delete
    8. Well the FBI removed their links to SPLC and ADL. This article calls the SPLC an anti-Christian group, says "The Southern Poverty Law Center's mission is to advance the agenda of the Left" and the Army will discontinue briefings on extremists groups. I think those statements are incorrect and whoever is making the decisions does not fully understand the agenda of the Patriot groups.

      NLA has a plan, already set in motion, to intimidate and arrest court clerks and judges at their whim, all in the name of God. The whole program is rooted in Darash's religious beliefs. As Gingersnap pointed out, when the group storms the court room on 4/22 they will not rise for the judge - unless he is carrying a Bible when he enters the court room.

      It's not my intention to start a discussion about religion - just pointing out that this country was founded based on freedom of religion and some these groups seem to have forgotten that. There are a lot of people in this country that don't appreciate Christian extremists any more than they appreciate Al Qaida. Some Christian extremists are so afraid of Islam, they are over reacting to introduce and pass legislation, that we don't need, against Sharia Law. Unless judges are considered a class of people, I'm not sure how NLA would qualify as a hate group. But where is our protection against extreme Christians? Cop killers are coming out of these groups. NLA is like a lot of others, they are recruiting military and law enforcement members to rise up with arms against our government. Just like law enforcement did after the shootings in West Memphis, AR, I think military members should also be educated when it comes to these groups. It's not just police officers they plan to kill if there is an armed conflict when they attempt to take over.

      I understand why the SPLC would mention NLA (although I still haven't found that they did). NLA is a bunch of bullies, IMO, with a publicized plan to "FORCE" their religious and political views on the rest of us. What they are planning is not "reform" - they intend to change our entire way of life and eventually the world, based solely on their beliefs. And if you think they have the slightest chance at success, you may want to start collecting silver coins.

      End of rant.

      http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/conservatives-doj-fbi-stop-advancing-southern-poverty-law-center-s-anti

      Delete
    9. Darash straight up said you can either be ruled by God, or tyrants. There is no in between.

      Darash has been smart enough, so far, to scrub all the things that would be considered "hate" speech, and just keeps it all related to paper terrorism.

      But when his members call in and rant, you can hear some of the hate, words like banksters and NWO, creeping out

      Delete
    10. Good point. Like you said: "...but quickly had the class repeat the first two rules of fight club". Darash is sharp enough to keep his mouth shut about some stuff, but others leak the real agenda. I even heard a request to get rid of smart meters when the group comes to power. Darash agreed the meters are a health hazard.

      Tin foil, anyone?

      Delete
    11. eaglerising.com/5037/splc-annual-hate-list/

      I assumed National Liberty Alliance is affiliated with the umbrella group Liberty Alliance

      Delete
    12. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/24/tea-party-leader-says-group-seeks-to-marginalize-him-with-sovereign-citizen/

      Delete
    13. None of these groups last too long, for obvious reasons, so the beg borrow and steal off the previous group. Thefogbow has a great run down of this newest group the NLA http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=10285&start=200

      Delete
    14. I just noticed you had already found the Fox News link. Much of what is in SPLC's data bank never gets published by them anywhere, but it is available on request by the media unless it is classified not to be for distribution.

      Delete
    15. the reason the NLA is generating so much interest right now, including from the FBI, is unlike with Bill a year ago preaching all this citizen grand jury bs, these NLA folks are not kidding. They are really going to march in their and indict judges and court officials with their own made up seals and everything. If a judge or clerk refuses to cooperate with them, they will indict and issue an arrest warrant for that person.

      Delete
    16. Thanks, Webb. All of the groups in this movement have similar names. All of them are asking for donations. And like Darash and Windsor, most members don't like to be called SovCits.

      Delete
    17. Yeah, I like how Darash thinks the FBI is OK with his plan. Just because the FBI isn't violating or impeding his right to free speech and right to assemble, Darash thinks the FBI might be on board with the whole idea of arresting judges under the authority of indictment by a Common Law Grand Jury.

      Delete
    18. Oh look, and here's another group forming. The leader of this one is Carl Swennson, an ex Windsor follower. Carl formed his own grand jury to indict President Obama. Bill went to the hearing.

      http://www.henryherald.com/news/2014/jan/10/man-who-indicted-obama-to-form-whistleblower-group/

      Delete
    19. yeah he's the guy that Windsor stole his April Fools grand jury stunt from. Wash, rinse, repeat.

      Delete
    20. yeah, I got side tracked by all this fun - it struck me how they just keep trying the same exact thing over and over. What is the definition of insanity?

      I was looking for links to the fiasco in TN, where Swennson was part of a group that physically tried to arrest a judge. I found this wiki piece, which makes your point. It includes a recap of the Huff/Fitzpatrick effort to "take back our country".

      LMAO at this description of the hearing in GA Bill attended with Swennson: The Drudge Retort described the hearing as, "Empty Table 1, Orly Taitz 0".

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_eligibility_litigation#Walter_Fitzpatrick_III_and_Darren_Huff

      Delete
    21. I think Darash's super secret corporate stuff starts on page 42 of his Quo Warranto. For someone who thinks being called a sovereign citizen marginalizes him, he sure uses the words sovereignty and sovereign people a lot.

      http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Quo%20Waranto%20filed%203-24-14.pdf

      Delete
    22. @THE HOPPER: You write, "Darash has been smart enough, so far, to scrub all the things that would be considered "hate" speech, and just keeps it all related to paper terrorism. But when his members call in and rant, you can hear some of the hate, words like banksters and NWO, creeping out..."

      So in your world Darash must share the opinions of everyone that calls him? That is stellar HOPPER.

      Does that mean that everything spoken by your audience here can fairly be attributed to you? I've seen some real whackos post to this blog so should I assume you agree with and think like all of them?

      Delete
    23. @ nottyringtojoin:

      1) Darash is leading and inciting these people to over throw our government and take over our country.

      2) Gingersnap is not leading and inciting these people to over throw our government and take over our country.

      If you are going to take the crap on this blog so seriously, please be serious enough about the topic to f'ing read and listen to this stuff before you make another comment.

      Delete
    24. You seem to be heading for a meltdown nb. I know you believe we are ALL GONNA DIE at the hands of these INSANE activists, but we are not going to die tonight. Have another drink and calm down!

      Delete
    25. I'm starting to be concerned that you have a crush on THE HOPPER nb. He's married you know? He's too young for you anyway.

      It's sweet that you think you should defend him but what does that say about his ability to defend himself?

      Delete
    26. Oh, just saw this ^^^. Yeah. Nope - again talking about stuff without a clue of the FACTS. But just like Mary B, Mary D, Nancy, Sharon and all the other disturbed people that hooked up with Bill, she just can't keep her illness to herself. I wasn't defending Gingersnap. I was losing my patience with her ignorance and illness.

      Delete
  2. It appears that the NLA was dropped a line about the blog. It is interesting that they are ordering water, MREs, extra food, and stockpiling stuff as if they are going to go to war with someone. Maybe they are preppers I am not sure. I felt I was listening to the glen Beck show again.

    What solidifies my thought on this was another hater against the government woman named Joann she writes, "whoever your name is. Interesting information...we will just ignore like they ignore is...best thing to do in light of he ignorance in these articles...they are most probably trolls from FEDS or another alphabet agency doing this...always their tactic. We will not be sidetracked.
    Thanks again. - Jo Ann"

    Notice her thoughts like many other crazy advocates that anyone who opposed to the ideas they have about their stories, were all agents of the government. LOL I keep hearing this over and over from these types of people who support these advocate groups and anti-fovernment patriot groups as the SPLC calls them. The talk radio shows egg them on all day and tell them that people like who disbelieve are almost like people without Jesus.

    SMH about it all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember though, this is dealing with the extreme of the extreme, this happens to be the far right but you can find the eco terrorist on the way far left. For that matter every religion has its own set of crazies as well. They are no more the representation of conservatives or Christianity any more than Al Qaida is of Islam

      Delete
    2. "Marty Prehn
      Denny I just got word that Pastor Terry Jones will be back in Dearborn in June the 14th for a Freedom of Speech rally with a bikers group.
      2 · Yesterday at 9:58pm
      Denny Boysen
      That's the muslim capital of America alright, we are being infiltrated with muslim refugees in many cities and getting worse.
      1 · Yesterday at 10:02pm
      Gilleigh McLain
      If there were ever a cause for the death penalty, it is this. Why should tax payers pay for a lifetime of decent living for this evil miscreant?
      2 · Yesterday at 10:35pm
      Denny Boysen
      Yes, and he will want foot baths and halal meals i'm sure..ugh!!
      1 · 11 hours ago"

      Delete
    3. Your right Ginger, There are extremists of all types on all sides.

      Delete
    4. Marty doesn't have a side. Completely round.

      Delete
    5. Sean D. Fleming: Please learn how to spell before you push "ENTER' - or hire yourself a proofreader, man! Just think - you'll be giving someone a job. After all, Obama ISN'T!!!!!

      Delete
    6. Yes Sean, it is the spelling that is important, not the content! smh

      I love how that post was anon, so that the next time that poster make a spelling, grammatical, punctuation error the post won't be thrown in his face.

      This is the internet anon. Get over yourself.

      Delete
  3. Here is an interesting article http://dearborn.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/organizers-cancel-2013-arab-international-festival

    ReplyDelete
  4. Spammy you are hilarious. Humor without being over the line vicious. Thanks for the laughs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So it would appear that "Susan Harbison" thinks the NLA will hand out "Pie Points" for sleuthing like Windsor does. She is pretty stupid. As Ginger already pointed out in the previous article differentiating the NLA and Lawless America. The NLA is focused on a mission, and not on opposition.

    I would think that the NLA being so focused would tell her to FO right about now, since this is her second or so attempt to get them distracted. So, why is she trying to distract them? What is her goal? Clearly she is like the first ant at a picnic, and they will just squish her, and keep on going. Perhaps she thinks they are easily distracted like Windsor, and she can some how swoop in and try and take over? Hahahaha

    http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/preface
    Down at the bottom they listed her information.
    "Here are the headers...

    from: sbharbison@gmail.com
    subject: Terrorist Group?
    return path:"

    Nice try Snoozan, nice try. TROLL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If she would bother to listen to maybe 10 minutes of their shows she would understand why they would be labelled that. They would call it taking back their Country, but the technical definition for what they are proposing at this time, and in some cases already carrying out, is paper terrorism.

      What she can't seem to get is that they are not like her Willy, this isn't a game, a scam, they really mean it and believe it. They are not interested in spending the rest of their lives filing frivolous lawsuits. They want to execute on the plans they have set out, nothing more nothing less. And its that very same resolve is why they now have all of Bill's ex followers

      Delete
    2. Yeah, Snoozan did not post out of interest in reform. Her agenda re: this blog is obvious. Too bad it's a wasted effort. Maybe she should have chosen a different screen name like "tryingtostirthepot" or "tryingtogetablogsuedagain". Maybe she should stick to helping Bill understand court orders or keeping Bill stirred up about dissenters.

      Delete
    3. LOL @ tryingtostirthepot!!

      Yep, the only pot she seems to be able to stir, is Big Vexi's stew. His reputation of being vindictive has opened the door for anyone who either likes to watch him flounder, or wants to keep him chasing his tail or both. He is easily distracted, and easily mislead because he is so angry and hateful. He plays right into it.

      Delete
    4. wow they get one email from her and label her a poisoner... LOL

      That's okay, she can consult with Billy about his latest denials in Montana.

      Delete
    5. "Snoozan did not post out of interest in reform"

      That is correct. I posted because I see them becoming your next target and think they should be aware of it. Whether they choose to do anything about it is their business but I was happy to make them aware.

      Delete
    6. Go play with Bill Susan, I think he needs some help after he was denied in multiple ways today.

      Delete
    7. The Montana case...smh....he is his own worst enemy.

      Delete

    8. "That is correct. I posted because I see them becoming your next target and think they should be aware of it. Whether they choose to do anything about it is their business but I was happy to make them aware." Susan H.

      Lets get this right susan before you babble your mouth off. They are not a target. It is a topoc of discussion. My opinion it is not a good idea to act like your the court or have powers you don't. This is not England there is no King at all.

      The story here;
      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/24/tea-party-leader-says-group-seeks-to-marginalize-him-with-sovereign-citizen/

      There are 1300+ comments there. I think it is my 1st amendment rights to have an opinion that I am opposed. I believe they will be arrested. Am I going to stop them from doing what they are? No. I will talk about what it is they are doing.

      Delete
    9. The Kansas case? Also a mistake.

      Delete
    10. Ok Sean, let's get it right. There is a fine line between discussing and targeting. THE HOPPER is prone to crossing that line and he did so when he began his article with, "John Darash and his domestic terrorist group, National Liberty Alliance". As we have seen in the comments here, there is no evidence that the NLA is a domestic terrorist group. It is one thing to discuss and another to make false statements of fact during that discussion. In my observation of this blog, once someone is targeted, the false statements of fact flow quite freely.

      Delete
    11. Snoozan you have a serious mental issue with "Statements" and "Opinions." Go back to law school and try reading the words this time.

      Delete
    12. Because YOU think you know the difference? WHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA

      Delete
    13. Why don't you tell me ALL about the difference 5:51. I would love to hear your understanding of the law.

      Delete
    14. ::taps foot, looks at nails, taps some more:: I'll give you some time to google it 5:51. I'll check back later. I look forward to it!

      Delete
    15. Susan please understand that myself and or Gingersnap are not people who have labeled the group as a domestic Terrorist group, the FBI has classified them as such along with the ADL, You might want to argue it with them whether or not saying that you will take up rifles (AR-15's) and fight to constitute British Common Law. Calling anyone a treasonist, is only a war time crime.

      Here are two articles for you to read. It specifically states, "They hold illegal courts that issue warrants for judges and police officers" That is what they are doing.


      http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/september-2011/sovereign-citizens

      http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/april/sovereigncitizens_041310

      Delete
    16. Does either article call them a terrorist group? Is there any credible source that has decided those are terrorist activities? That is what I'm asking. Because if not, THE HOPPER has nothing to substantiate his statement that they are terrorists.

      Delete
    17. @ Snoozan - why just this blog? Why didn't you happily make sure NLA is aware of the other blogs discussing their plans?

      Delete
    18. Maybe you didn't see it Susan. Why do we constantly have to lead you to something you won't see anyway? LMAO and here over at Bill's place it was all good he didn't post up anything to prove what he said and you were all good with it.

      All boils down to your frame of mind, and not what's right in front of your face. Hahahahah Good luck with that!

      Delete
    19. @ nobodywantsyoutojoin aka Snoozan: Gingersnap isn't obligated to substantiate his statement to satisfy you and a credible source is not needed to reach that conclusion. You should listen to the radio shows, the videos and read the literature. Then draw your own conclusion. Until you have a clue what you are talking about your, uh...constructive criticism, is irrelevant. Really, you are beginning to appear more and more out of touch with reality.

      Delete
    20. I think Susan likes being the red herring.

      Delete
    21. Ok, I read the article. As usual, if you see a drop of rain it must mean it's coming from a hurricane. The FBI's classification of SC's is VERY specific and it does NOT fit the NLA.

      The fact that the NLA has adopted ONE technique for reform that has been used by SC's in the past, does not mean the NLA are the same as SC's.

      I could list a long list of the practices of orthodox Jews along side a list of the practices of non-orthodox Jews. Some activities will appear on both lists. Does that mean the non-orthodox are really orthodox?

      You can't classify people are a member of a separate group simply because they share a few common elements.

      Delete
    22. LISTEN TO THEM TALK AND READ THEIR SH*T.

      Delete
    23. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    24. Nb, I am not an NLA member so I am not aware of or interested in looking for other groups that misrepresent them. I do support the NLA, so I would have told them about any group I became aware of.

      If THE HOPPER'S statement that the NLA are terrorists was based on nothing more than his own opinion, he should not have written it as a statement of FACT like he did.

      Delete
    25. You have no idea what we are talking about. You have no idea what you are talking about. Nobody here owes you an explanation or justification for a statement or an opinion. Nobody here cares whether you agree or disagree. This crap with you is really, really getting old. Your ignorance is apparent in every comment you've made tonight. Either study the topic or don't. Keep up with the topic or don't. But if you don't, then STFU. You have absolutely nothing of value to offer or discuss.

      Delete
    26. I don't need to listen to them talk. I've read their intentions as they are formally set forth. I do not intend to presume that they have some other "real agenda".

      What people say (you have heard of venting right?) and what they do are two different things. They want to see change, they are angry about it, and when they talk amongst themselves I would expect them to exaggerate.

      Delete
    27. Oh my post at 7:34 really struck a nerve didn't it nb?

      Delete
    28. Susan When you go with your group to deliver arrest warrants to sheriffs who then intern put the cuffs on you for delivering fake legal documents you'll understand when your also charged by the federal prosecutor for Domestic Terrorism and maybe you will be sent to Cuba also.Susan all I can say is your stupid but if you want to support people who believe and take action as the NLA go right ahead but as I will say again your probably will end up in Jail also.

      Delete
    29. Sean I am not a MEMBER of the NLA and I do not approve of the ridiculous GJ approach. I support them because ANY group that is peacefully exercising their right to demand reform is a good thing.

      Delete
    30. @ Snoozan - the only nerve you hit is the one that limits bullsh*t intake. I am really tired today of people with mental disorders. Please find help. Until you start to act like your on your way to good mental health, I am through with you.

      Delete
    31. Flemin - leave it alone. You will turn blue in the face before this asshat gets a clue.

      Delete
    32. Or maybe you need to get a grip Susan and quit making assumptions. This is not a news site, it is a blog,full of opinions. You really are blind.

      Delete
    33. Susan, you believe that it is not against the law for them to have these illegal court filings and to creatw their own courts that are not recognized?

      Delete
    34. Have you read their official quo warrants? Of course you can't find it, but there is a link up thread. There are numerous opinions out there about this group, you are just too lazy to look. Facts don't matter to your 'opinion'

      Delete
    35. Bahahaha, I wish I'd kept a record of how many times you've been through with me nb. You have a habit of saying that to people but it never lasts. Feel free to make me the exception!

      Delete
    36. Susan is just like bill she can't deal with reality. The country is not going to change to be the way they want it to be,

      Delete
    37. Susan, do you think this blog is treasonous and we are treasoners? If so what are you going to do about it.

      Delete
    38. Sean it is not against the law for them to pretend they are a GJ. As you know, it is issuing the documents that crosses the line. I don't know the law on it in every state but I suspect they are going to be in trouble if they follow through with their entire GJ plan.

      I'm not going to do it, lol, but I don't mind THEM doing it. If they are willing to sacrifice themselves via civil disobedience (as many people have heroically done in the past) I am all for it. It is one way to bring attention to the cause.

      Delete
    39. Sean, what in the world makes you think I think this blog is treasonous?

      Delete
    40. I did not say it was where is Susan's answer? they have already tried to give documents on Monday using their grand Jury letter head.

      Delete
    41. so you just said it...."it is issuing documents that crosses the line"......ummm they have already done that and the plan to do a ton more of them. You and them think that's called "patriotism", I call it terrorism. And guess what? We still live in America not your form of it so I'm entitled to my opinion on it.

      Delete
    42. Sean I don't know why you asked if I think this blog is treasonous. I have to assume you misread my post where I said that one of the NLA people said MY EMAIL was treasonous, but he was obviously referring to the part of my email that was THE HOPPER'S article.

      Like I said, if they want to give out documents it's fine with me. If some of them get felony charges out of it the GJ plan is going to die a rapid death.
      I think you misunderstand what I mean when I say I support the group. I don't agree with their plan but I support their GOAL.

      Delete
    43. It is my opinion also but it is also my opinion that they fit the description of one based on the FBI website. What will you do about that? Eh Susan.

      Delete
    44. I never said that I DID NOT recognize that their plans include criminal actions. But not every criminal action is terrorism. I certainly never said I think the GJ thing is patriotism. It is not terrorism either.

      I'd prefer to see them make their point some other way, lol, but I applaud the fact that they ARE doing something.

      Delete
    45. Its simple, she gets her favorite vexatious litigant to sue you for having an opinion on the internet. An opinion that happens to match the description of what the FBI terms as paper terrorism

      Delete
    46. Susan....can we just end this with your definition of terrorism and ours and the FBI's is different?

      Delete
    47. "It is my opinion also but it is also my opinion that they fit the description of one based on the FBI website. What will you do about that? Eh Susan."

      I'm not doing anything about it Sean. First, that statement is not defamatory. Second, it is not about me. Why would I want to do anything about it?

      Delete
    48. Clearly my definition of terrorism is different than your's HOPPER. My definition is exactly what the FBI has stated.

      I have no problem agreeing to disagree on the matter.

      Delete
    49. There you go, you just said it....them calling this blog guilty of their goofed up version of treason is no different than me calling them terrorists. I'm not suing them, they wont sue me. See how America works?

      Delete
    50. "Paper terrorism refers to the use of false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other ungrounded legal documents to harass others, especially against government officials. It is the filing and sending of false documents to intimidate police, government officials and private citizens."

      That is what we are referring too.... no one is saying they are trying to blow people up Al Qaida style terrorist. It doesn't matter if you want to accept that term or definition, it exists and in this context it is applied appropriately

      Delete
    51. Susan since you are supporting a domestic terrorist you are one also, your a conspirator with them. Which in the end your a Domestic Enemy of the state since you have put your self out there.

      Delete
    52. Sigh, no, you've got that completely wrong HOPPER.

      Defamation law is so complex that very few attorneys understand it. There is no chance you are ever going to "get" the nuances that make the difference between a protected statement and an actionable statement.

      The courts often have to split hairs to make a decision, but there would be no need to split hairs here. The "treason" comment was well within the bounds of opinion. Your "terrorist" statement, is not.

      It is your belief that you DO understand the difference that leads you to KEEP making actionable statements. RECOGNIZE your limitations for God's sake!

      Delete
    53. My 8:31 post is in response to HOPPER'S 8:22 post.

      I have agreed to disagree on the proper meaning of "terrorist" so I have no further comment on that subject.

      Delete
    54. how is "Paper terrorism refers to the use of false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other ungrounded legal documents to harass others, especially against government officials. It is the filing and sending of false documents to intimidate police, government officials and private citizens." Nuanced?

      Delete
    55. Susan you know that when the FBI raids a place and gets names and records that you supported them, then your on the bad guy list. Just saying. It is an opinion of what might happen to you. Just as is my opinion that your guilty by association and support. Do you think that people who support terrorists with money are not guilty of a crime? You need to consult with an attorney. I can have a believe that anyone who supports this group which has been in the news and others that have also. But as defined on the FBI website your doing business with them that means you could be seen as a terrorist also or a terrorist supporter.

      Delete
    56. I hear susan your some attorney, I have to say that I would never want you representing me if that is the case nor making any interpretations of the law either.

      Delete
    57. This is susan in court she is the witness http://youtu.be/eNZ1O2KTOOg

      Delete
    58. Susan I think I have found out by searching Google the real reason about FB, According to commentators that is caused by some type of government program that is using low end noise that has a frequency that constantly distracts you enough to make you not be able to retain information like an ADHD child not strong enough to permanently hurt your ears but just enough to make you have not enough concentration to make you forget or not remember what your seeing. They sell special ear filters for protection against this government warfare at the Glenn Beck website.

      Delete
    59. Sean, I like that you are able to retain a sense of humor. I hope Glenn Beck accept Paypal!

      Delete
  6. From federal court 04/01/2014 Remark - Rcv'd call from Plaintiff this date. Experienced technial difficulties in viewing docs. 14,15,16 & 20. Sent documents again to nobodies@att.net. (CDH, ) (Entered: 04/01/2014)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These documents were all the motions from the university and the one show cause telling him to write a reason to why he should not be labeled a vexi

      Delete
    2. He always has some "technical difficulty." Sounds like he's trying to buy time for his reply that's due soon.

      Delete
    3. "technical difficulties in viewing"....well of course, its April

      Delete
    4. Ha! Windsor just lost his motion with the MT SC to repeal Boushie's TOP and apply sanctions. They also told Billy to refrain from any further filings (ie, FO).

      Delete
    5. Why is it Bill keeps on sending these motions in when he knows the outcome will be the same? Does he expect otherwise. I don't understand. Does he not understand court rules and procedures, or even court processes? That is why he is Pro-Se. Any attorney would never send these types of motions in on his behalf.

      Delete
    6. I think he knows exactly how it will end, he enjoys the harassment and online intimidation that he gets in the process. Just look at his fb page. That is what he "lives" for

      Delete
    7. Dang. They slammed him in both cases on the same day.

      Delete
    8. In other news The Lawless America Trademark (there was never a copyright) was refused based on, "Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in connection with any of the goods and/or services specified in International Class 35. 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). Specifically, only the words are seen, and the mark is not shown in connection with the “political action committee” services"

      As we know that Louis A. Piccone the attorney that started this for Lawless America Association but said they were a PAC that would violate the Lawless America Association bylaws and the company is prohibited in those types of business doings. Lawless America Association also applied as an LLC which is not what they are. Is this a fraud or a mistake? Flip Flopping here will not be good.

      Delete
    9. Exactly. And he enjoys the pity, and attention. An angry old man addicted to FB and court. What a combo.

      Delete
    10. So Bill got a no from 2 courts in one day? Must be time for some pity pie...followed by a big ole belch of rants and motions.

      Delete
    11. http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0785%20Deny%20--%20Order?id={D338C062-A2AD-47D2-88E0-26E0E42A45FA}

      http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/OP%2014-0173%20Final%20Disposition:%20Deny%20--%20Order?id={50A922EC-ADE2-47F5-9DFF-BDC9F2209512}

      Delete
    12. Double Spanked...The MT SC teaches Billy to "turn the other cheek."

      (We'll hear from Sunoooooozzzzzzzzozan soon...she knew this was coming all along).

      Delete
    13. @2:34 Anon: "So Bill got a no from 2 courts in one day?"

      One court, MT SC, two rulings.

      Delete
    14. Maybe they will have another by the end of the day on the issue. Also, maybe he will be denied leave from federal court in Northern Texas soon also.

      Delete
    15. Oooohhhh!! LMAO Sluggo! Double whammy, for his double slammy!

      Delete
    16. It is Plain to me that she is sitting in lap and or on his leg and he hand is on her waistline so low it could be her Ass, plausibly so.

      Delete
    17. Double Tammy Slammy! ^^^

      Delete
    18. Yes Spammy, we see that you posted one of your links. Can you wait a MINUTE for someone to applaud?

      Delete
    19. OH NO, I am SURE Sluggo and Spammy are different people, wahahahahhaha.

      Yes I am so embarrassed! As anyone can see by my messages, I have no desire to join that group. So it is horrifying that one of the recipients made the mistake of thinking I was the author of THE HOPPER'S article and is treating me accordingly. Whatever will I do NOW?

      Delete
    20. I'm trying to imagine what it would be like to be face blind.

      Delete
    21. I don't think they thought you were the author of the article Snooze, it's more like they instantly disliked you. You clearly stated you were only sharing info with them, and they called you a poisoner....or can't you see that?

      Delete
    22. Google it Crockpot.

      Delete
    23. What I see Oceans is that when I posted the same information directly to their forum, I received a very polite response from a rational person.

      I also see that ONE individual dubbed me a "poisoner" because I sent him a "TREASONOUS" email. I don't see that THEY called me anything and I think the intelligence of the email recipient speaks for itself. Or do you consider THE HOPPER'S article treasonous? Because that comment was certainly directed at the content of the email, not the fact that I sent the email.

      Delete
    24. BTW, the GENII are welcome for the exposure I gave the blog, lol. I'll bet you had more hits in the past 24 hours than you've had in a very long time.

      Hmmm, I just gave myself an idea.

      Delete
    25. Susan maybe you didn't see it clearly. They understood you didn't write the article, you were simply tattling. They aren't like your Willy, and clearly didn't appreciate your information. You must think your news would greet them with appreciation, but no so much. See, this is why no one likes you. You see what you want to see, and not what's in front of your face.

      You believe you are the super intelligent being, yet you clearly have no clue about whether a statement is a fact of an opinion. Not going to "educate" you. You're just blind, deaf and dumb.

      Delete
    26. *or* an opinion. ^^^

      Delete
    27. and the response to your comment Snooze was that they would ignore us. Sorry. You really didn't matter to them either.

      Maybe you should try to find Bill and help him out. I hear he is very down today. Don't get lost, you should be able to recognize him from the cowboy hat. ;)

      Delete
    28. I made it as clear as possible that I was tattling 6:37. I received comments from two people....one who was quite nice and thanked me, another who called the article treasonous, lol.

      Can you see clearly that the two response were completely different? Where do you get "they"?

      Ooooh, you are not going to school me on fact v. opinion? Drat. Why does this not surprise me though? If anyone here ever owned their shit it would be a miracle!

      Delete
    29. You mean Bill has NOT been captured? I thought he'd be in jail by now because one of the GENII SAID he would. What happened to those criminal charges based on him making a phone call?

      Delete
    30. You, like Bill, like to group people together. To Bill, everyone is somehow a Joey, to you they are GENII. I know you have trouble recognizing people as individuals. But even you have to know what Curtis says to Bill is between them. They are different people. Really, go look attheir pictures.

      Delete
    31. I never offered to school you on anything Snoozy. You are mixing me up with someone else. No surprise there though.

      Delete
    32. And please Snooze, don't be stupid, no one really believes what Bill posts, and no one thought he was getting arrested today. Bill is just a drama princess.

      Or can't you see that?

      Delete
    33. Susan has a hard time recognizing a lot of things. She will make the best of any situation as long as she can feel her way around it, not necessarily the reality of it.

      So, if she got some emails placating her, she took it as a pat on the back for a good job. Mean while, they are rolling their eyes, but she didn't see it.

      Delete
    34. What are you talking about 7:25? I didn't get any email placating me. I posted the message on the public NLA board and someone answered me there...in public.

      I didn't take it as a pat anywhere, lol. I passed on the info, acknowledging that they do NOT bother with detractors (maybe you didn't see THAT) and that I didn't expect them to do anything about the article. They thanked me for spending the two minutes it took for me to do that. I'm not the one claiming they cared about it either way. I am only refuting that "they" were offended by it, lol.

      Delete
    35. Susan, do you think this blog is treasonous and we are treasoners? If so what are you going to do about it.

      Delete
    36. Snoozan brain imparement on isle 4-

      "What are you talking about 7:25? I didn't get any email placating me. I posted the message on the public NLA board and someone answered me there...in public."

      LMAO really? In public? So when they say they got an email from the Prisoner were they lying? Hahahhahaha

      "Email I recieved from a poisoner today"
      Notice they say they couldn't copy the full header? As in EMAIL HEADER??? "I could not copy all of the headers. Anyone wanting a full copy of the letter, email me and I will forward it."
      And they can "Forward" it??? OMG Stop!! You're so stupid "susan" !!! ahahahahahahahahahah

      Delete
    37. Snoozan went back to NLA for more:

      Treasonous?
      nottryingtojoin's picture

      Can you explain how the EMAIL was treasonous?

      Submitted by nottryingtojoin on Wed, 04/02/2014 - 17:08
      Treasonous? As ludicrous as the content of the letter
      sofasurferlinux's picture

      THATS the only thing you see wrong with this email?

      Submitted by sofasurferlinux on Wed, 04/02/2014 - 21:30
      smh
      nottryingtojoin's picture

      Go back and look at the email I sent you. All of the text that was NOT WRITTEN BY ME should be in blue text.

      I emailed you, to point you to a blog that I believe grossly misrepresents the NLA.

      So what I was asking you above was how MY email was treasonous. Are you saying I did something treasonous by telling you someone ELSE wrote that article about you?

      Delete
    38. And they are still not interest in what Susan has to say lol. Want to bet she doesn't understand they don't care what she has to say?

      Delete
    39. Anon 10:12: It is clear you have become VERY VERY lost when it comes to my contact with the NLA.

      If you go back and read all of the posts about it very carefully, there is a chance you will understand how idiotic your post is. smh

      Delete
    40. It is clear that Snoozan is VERY VERY VERY irrelevant to NLA and any discussion about them. If she would go back and read all of the posts about it very carefully, there is a chance she would understand NLA is not a new topic and how lost and idiotic she appears in making any comments about it.

      Delete
  7. I see some things never change... Bill is still trying to break his way into the clubhouse... Susan stills thinks she's the smart one... And sluggo still posting pics.... Ok that last one I'm glad hasn't changed! Bravo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As if you are returning from an absence of some kind Spawn? Give me a break!

      Delete
    2. Awe have you missed me that much Susan? Well I have a little time... Is there something you need me to set you straight on? Keep in mind I only have a little time... I can't fix stupid.

      Delete
    3. Suze, don't you wish you could just have one day when your brain fired on all, what was your word, cylinders?

      Delete
    4. I'll let you choose the topic Spawn. Surely you want to set me straight on something?

      Delete
    5. Eh, do you want to explain that comment HOPPER? I mean was it about something specific or was it just the usual third grade slam that didn't require any real thought on your part?

      Delete
    6. actually, it was pretty specific Susan. Or don't you recognize i?

      Delete
    7. recognize it?

      Delete
    8. Your reference to a common expression is specific. I'm asking you what PROMPTED it. Was it just your usual empty insult or is there some actual substance behind it?

      Delete
    9. you have commented before that your brain wasn't firing on all cylinders

      Delete
    10. As always, substance. But like a familiar face, you won't recognize it

      Delete
    11. Dang... How I feel bad for her... Because I can't fix retarded either...

      Delete
    12. So after all those lectures about how the anons needed to pick a name, turns out she still couldn't tell them apart

      Delete
    13. Maybe Bill can ask Susan if she can identify the people in the pictures he has from court. Oh wait, never mind.

      Delete
    14. AnonymousApril 2, 2014 at 6:49 PM
      "you have commented before that your brain wasn't firing on all cylinders"

      OMG for real? LMAO, you really think I remember using a common expression here sometime during the past year? And YOU remember it? Someone is focusing a bit too closely on the "satire" here.

      Delete
    15. I have to assume from the face blindness and quoting of something I said in the past that you are taking a stroll down memory lane. Reviewing old posts are we, lol?

      Hmmm, what could cause someone to subject themselves to work like that? Keep chasing your tales GENII!

      Delete
    16. We are not talking about the "satire" on here, we are talking about your self professed mental disability that you have admitted too elsewhere. One would think that someone with a self professed mental disorder, wouldn't spend their life trolling blogs and talking down to people. But then again that's what someone with all cylinders firing would think, Susan gives us the other view.

      Delete
    17. at least she is an attorney, even though she is confused on whether or not that makes her smart or stupid

      Delete
    18. Go to Google. Type in quotes "Susan Harbison" "face blindness (or variation of)" "Joeyisalittlekid".

      Typing the above into google search will confirm if you ever used the term face blindness on this blog "Susan". A particular page link to the JIALK blog will pop up if you said it here. Hope that helps.

      Btw, your grocery bill must have been huge with 3 boys.

      Delete
    19. @8:27: Yes I did have a big grocery bill, lol. It took you ALL THIS TIME to find that?

      Delete
    20. OMG, I just read THE HOPPER'S 7:59!!! Absolutely hilarious. You really think you found something don't you? BAHAHAHHAHAHA

      Keep looking if this is your first attempt to find me elsewhere on the net. You can find much much more. Enjoy!

      Delete
    21. well given your own admitted mental incapability's, I found enough to tell me all I need to know about you

      Delete
    22. You know HOPPER, many people that are gifted have a tiny part of their brain that does not work right. I guess a brain can only hold so much, lol. This is not a problem you will ever worry about!

      Delete
    23. Is she kidding? The tiny part of her brain that does not work right is a big problem. For anyone with whom she has contact.

      Delete
    24. I agree. It also seems to impair her ability to rational thought process. She is off top dead center. She just justifies and excuses everything, can't see things that other people see, literally or figuratively. I think she over compensates with her arrogance and narcissism. Like, it's everyone else's problem and not hers. Another big blind spot!

      Delete
    25. I think Susan would trade everything for one "colorable" claim for not going to her upcoming 40th high school reunion

      Delete
    26. Yep, I am a face blindness sufferer! I've never been a visual person. Fortunately, when a person has a weakness in one of their senses their other senses benefit. ::shrugs::

      I'm glad you all will have some new material to work with. For an entire year I've been subjected to the same generic put downs you use on EVERYONE. Narcissist, off the meds, troll , cunt etc. BORING!

      It's always better when you can personalize your posts and I'm sure I can look forward to hearing endless jokes about FB. ANYTHING will be better than hearing the same things over and over and over. CARRY ON GENII!

      Delete
    27. Your problem isn't that you are face blind, its that you are self blind. You can't see yourself for who you are, you are in denial and you lash out on the internet in an effort to feed your delusions.

      I didn't cross THE line when I called them paper terrorist, I crossed YOUR line. You have said it yourself, you were behind the initial goal of LA and you support the goal of NLA. Now sure, thanks to your "condition" you consider yourself far superior to each of the individuals and the stupid tactics they take. But nevertheless, you are one of them.

      Just like Bill, you and him are both confused over the flag you have waiving over your head. You want to espouse SovCit tenants but want to pretend like you are not one when people call you on it. That is why you are so deeply confused with how the NLA responded to your little tattle tale. They don't call it defamation because they know its not. They will call it treason or poison because I'm not one of them, but they know in a court of law, what they are doing is considered exactly that. That is why, unlike you and Bill, they are not confused about what flag they have on their head, they won't be wasting time with frivolous lawsuits, they will stay the course.

      Delete
    28. "I didn't cross THE line when I called them paper terrorist, I crossed YOUR line."

      Gingersnap nailed it. By her own admission she has no clue what NLA is planning. She has no clue what NLA has done so far to accomplish their goals. She has no clue what Darash is saying in public about his wish to take over New York, the country, then the world. She has no clue that the the methods Darash claims he is using to execute his plan violates the rights and compromises the safety others. She has no clue that other people are paying attention to and discussing NLA. She has no idea that the formation of CLGJ is not the issue that concerns many people.

      Because she is ignorant, and chooses to stay that way, she can not comprehend that other people have exactly the same opinion of NLA and express it similarly. No, no - it's enough for her to know that NLA has an anti-government agenda. She's already proven she'll support anyone that opposes the existing government. She attacks us for offending her belief that one of these off the wall groups with militia support will eventually affect meaningful "reform".

      Delete
    29. How did you become face blind?

      Delete
  8. "Can 750 Nobodies take back America?" Poor Susan, she probably thought she was signing up for some kind of face blind support group, turns out it was just a face palm group

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Susan needs to join the group that makes tin foil hats

      Delete
    2. LMAO - face palm group. An anon ^^^ up there somewhere reminded me where she came from. She is lemming. It's way too much to expect that she will all of a sudden have an interest in reality.

      I think she needs her meds adjusted.

      Delete
    3. OMG ahahahahaha!! Face palm Group! Hahahahaha

      Oh...Can't stop laughing....hahahhahahahahaha!!!

      I think her issue here, with our "ginger" that Susan IS a Ginger! And she's jealous our Ginger is more popular. Hahahahaha

      Delete
    4. Keep looking GENII! I can't believe it has taken you this long. So much awaits you!

      Delete
    5. I know Rain Man, you are "special"

      Delete
    6. @HOPPER: "I know Rain Man, you are 'special'..."

      I like to think everyone is special in some way. I know I am. If you are not HOPPER, try to contain your hatred for those who are. It's not about you. Don't take it personally.

      Delete
  9. First Bill Steals the Balch Springs PD Banner off the website. He is not suppose to be using this for FB. http://balchspringspd.com/ It has a copyright and I am sure they want to know about it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ok so back to Big Vexi- he's over on his FB page trying to undo some of the damage by kissing lemming butt. Wendy Robinson posted to Bill, and he tries to show come kind of human emotion...by asking about her parents. This is the repulsive reply about her cold blooded killing father.

    "Wendi Robinson The boys are doing fine, just miss Dad (grandpa)
    . The court appointed atty., Hickman (remember him), he has just really made a bigger mess of things......it's just unbelieveable how this whole situation has been handled, we just need to get the story out there. I have let dad know that yo have had some wackos to deal with, mom and dad as well as myself just want you to know that we are still with you and support you, we are worried about you, I'm sorry about your health issues, etc., but we are going to keep you in our prayers.......God bless you!!!!"

    This makes me ill. The guy fricken shot this man in his driveway, in cold blood, pre calculated. He deserves to rot in jail Wendy! Windsor, you are a disgusting POS. Period! (once again, in my humble opinion)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah but Lawless America doesn't support cold blooded murder....Bill pinky swore it in court. Must be true

      Delete
    2. That is repulsive. I'll bet those boys miss their dad more.

      Delete
    3. That's the "Vigilante Justice" system all these SC types promote. If they don't like the way the current court system is working, they take matters into their own hands. This is what Windsor promotes, supports, and does himself. Do whatever it takes to justify their actions.

      Delete
    4. What I appreciate about the difference in the 2 groups is that NLA is not concerned with changing laws to make what they did OK after the fact. They are taking action based on the strength of their convictions, the mission is divine and they are following God's law. They do not have a hidden agenda. And I'm a little worried about their plans for the Federal Reserve and their foreign policy but at least they are thinking past the end game.



      And for the sake of argument:

      vig·i·lan·te ˌvijəˈlantē/
      noun
      noun: vigilante; plural noun: vigilantes

      1. a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate.


      Yep. That definition is also appropriately applied too.

      Delete
    5. Come on NB, how can your mind possibly fathom all the nuanced complexities within that definition?

      Delete
    6. Then who does that make the Vigilance Committee?

      Delete
    7. 10:38: Let me help you there HOPPER. nb's post did not involve interpreting one of the most complicated areas of civil law. I think she is up to understanding the nuances of that definition.

      YOU on the other hand, are NOT CAPABLE of understanding the nuances of defamation law. Your confidence is unwarranted and you continue to say things you should not say. That doesn't mean you will ever be held completely accountable for it because you probably won't.
      However as I see it you have already paid a pretty high price and if I were you I would be attempting to limit my damages.

      It makes no difference to me if you want to gamble with your future. It's all entertainment to me!

      Delete
    8. "Your confidence is unwarranted"

      Yeah, so is Snoozan's. And annoying. As is her feeling of superiority. That tiny part of the brain that isn't firing on all cylinders nullifies any parts that might be superior and of benefit to society. That just makes her a plain old, run of the mill bully.

      Delete
    9. "Your confidence is unwarranted"

      That's what they (Montana Supremes) said to Windsor yesterday--TWICE.

      Delete
  11. This is too good to let go. "nottryingtojoin" because she disagrees with the CLGJ idea just signed up to be a juror for an assembly she opposes. The only thing consistent about Snoozan is her craziness.

    http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/?page=2

    I joined yesterday and have posted a few times since then. But I just changed my user name on my profile and now I don't see my previous posts. On most forums, the name change just appears on old the old posts.
    Are my previous posts here gone or can they be retrieved? Thanks in advance for any clues, lol.

    Submitted by sbharbison on Thu, 04/03/2014 - 03:13

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHAT TO DO NEXT - JOIN OUR ENDEAVOR REGISTER NOW by clicking the Register link at the top right side of this page. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT BY REGISTERING ON THIS SITE YOU ARE REGISTERING TO JOIN A JURY POOL. After you log in click on the "Jurist Tab" that will appear on the navigation bar above and you will see Step by Step by step instructions on what to do next.

      Delete
    2. Wait till she points out to them how the have the wrong forum format

      Delete
    3. What are you talking about now Nb? I did not "sign up" to do anything other than to post on the forum.

      As much excitement as my activity there has generated for the GENII, I do not intend to be posting there, lol.

      HOPPER, I don't need to tell them anything about their forum. They are already using a forum program rather than a blog program. You were really butt hurt when I suggested that you open a discussion forum instead of THE HOPPER SHOW blog weren't you?

      Delete