Yes, it is a fantastic article. I really like all the comparisons of the enablers. Those that watched and did nothing, those that stood by and encouraged him, ignoring the warning signs, or worse, excusing them altogether. Perfect!
Talking about enabling, 5 people posted comments after Bill said "I snapped this with the camera resting on my left arm as I drove down the highway at 70"
3 people "liked" his comment. Not one person said anything to him about how dangerous it is to other motorists on the road, while he's busy snapping pictures, instead of paying attention to the road. He does this all the time, taking pictures while he's driving. This is just reckless, and complete disregard for others around him. Unbelievable.
His personal FB is all he has left so he wouldn't dare chance reposting a picture that caused a "timeout". I'm betting he posted some info on someone like SB / against TOS. I'm sure FB has Billy on a very short leash.
That is correct... he posted links to his me.com, so I had it removed. So, he just movs the info to a new photo. hes figured out that its hard to report the comments made on a photo without reporting the photo. I now have the direct # to complaints. Not really a big deal, but I like that it pisses him off...
Sluggo, I thought the middle portion of the video—the monologue which wasn't actually all that "rant"y at all—was eloquent and valuable.
The rest... well, as we've discussed previously, it's not my cup of tea. But you make a good case for yourself (and even for the value you place on the material I don't much like) in between. Kudos.
BILL WINDSOR AND LAWLESS AMERICA SPEND TIME AT THE MONOLITHIC DOME INSTITUTE IN ITALY TEXAS.
I spent time today investigating another of my stalkers...the one who has made "veiled" threats to beat me with a hammer -- Brannon Bridge. I dro...ve by his home at 3 Maree Court, Waxahachie Texas for some photos. I also spent time in Italy Texas where Brannon Bridge works -- Monolithic Dome Institute. Both his place of work and his street are spooky places. After viewing some of the sick videos that Brannon Bridge has produced to harass me, I suspect that he is mentally ill....I mean really really sick in the head. I hope he will be institutionalized.
To reach Bill Windsor and Lawless America, email nobodies@att.net
I'm sure you know what you're talking about right? lol By the way you spelled your God's name incorrectly, it's Yahweh, not Yawhew. Thanks for playing :)
The gates of he'll are opening wide, I mean really wide, for the big butts of Ginger Snap and Yappy, chased by demon dogs, to enter the gates of the hell of the media's cruel glare. Smile.
Your laugh will ring hollow as the monster devours the wicked in the glare of TV cameras and grayscale print. Of course, as big as their butts are it will take a little while.
It makes the title of this post so apt, the fame of your choice will destroy you. That self-flattering resume won't mean a thing when they learn about your secret identity.
I understand that devotion, but I think you might need to be mote skeptical of bloggers who trashed you every chance they got until you started doing their dirty work. They will throw you to the wolves when it helps them to do so.
Do there dirty work? Why cause I love to make videos? Also i do my own dirty work and had told you that I stayed out of the shit between you and them I have kept that part and then You go and unfriend me, geez way to go....n also no one mentioned you or "summoned you" well I guess the Pro abortionist did though today at the Texas Capital, they were chanting "Hail Satan" so go be with those who summom you
And to clarify, we never trashed LB, we teased him. How can you not laugh at morph suits and some of videos?
Also, the "Beetlejuice" thing really only works for Attorney. Truth be known, if somebody said your name it was in trying to insult me. I wasn't insulted, were you?
Brannon; you crossed sides. I've never said an unkind word to you or about you. And I won't, but you have chosen a different route from what you previously traveled. I complimented you on one of your videos about the clubhouse. Others have been a little troubling. Actually, I defended you when Windsor's people contacted me about them. Your associations at this point make me uncomfortable, and that is why I unfriended you. It really had nothing to do with my opinion of you.
NBTDT: you usually are more honest than most of the people on this blog, but that is a lie. I won't repeat what you said out of sensitivity for Brannon, but that is bullshit. I expected better from you.
I'm not going to do that. It's all in their archives for you to read if you want. But I can promise you that no one was "teasing" you. The remarks were mean-spirited and designed to inflict anguish.
You are full of it and making sh*t up. We enjoyed the heck out LB's videos, we couldn't wait for the next one. The ones when he summoned the force were my favorites.
Nope. I have no idea WTF you are talking about. Lying is not my thing. I have never lied to you, don't have a reason to lie to you. Why would I start now?
Let me go ahead and clear something up, I stayed out of the attacks, between you and them, It was out of respect for both parties, there was never any sides crossed, however It was really fuckin hard to stay out of it, but I did, I have however noticed that after the initial shit between you and the blog I had seen that they asked you to leave, do to your vulgarness, and pettiness (I stayed out of it), I also remember you saying, you would not come back if they didn't mention you and I told you if someone mentioned your name then I would go after them, but (no one did), and then you get on and repost 5 times about how they did, so see you keep this shit going, posting all this "anon" bullshit and I personally don't give a shit anymore, the shit you said was horrible, and the shit that was said about you was horrible, but you were the vindictive shit that was keeping it going, and I would just suggest that the next letter you write to Joey, let him know how much you have come on here and harrassed people, I will write him soon though
Brannon, I do not answer to Joey about fucking anything. And I certainly do not answer to you. My relationship with Joey in correspondence continues to be professional and out of kindness I continue to report news about the lake area. My interest in this blog is none of your business so get over it.
@ Webb: The more I think about your last posts the more ticked off I've gotten. Especially as regards to this comment "The remarks were mean-spirited and designed to inflict anguish."
I distinctly recall defending Brannon's loyalty to Joey. I admire Brannon for standing by his friend and I have told him so many, many times. To this day I tell Brannon that is one aspect of his personality that drew me to him. God knows I am not and have never been afraid to post the truth about any topic - even my admiration for Brannon when it wasn't the most popular thing to do or say.
Whatever your motivation is, making crap up and calling me names isn't going to work for you. I honestly hoped that you and others on this blog could come to a Kumbaya point in life and we could all get along. But, I'm over it. Put me down as "crossed sides" with Brannon.
Well, a felony is a felony but it's not like he robbed banks, committed all the rapes at U of M, cyber stalked folks or sent death threats. More like civil disobedience. He plead guilty and received a deferred sentence.
its possible, but they would have to give up an email attached with the name, plus there really isn't any guarantee that it would solve much as they could just keep making up new sign in names
Operating an Internet Forum with Integrity: Forums 101
It is as simple as making and enforcing two rules:
1. All unidentified posts will be deleted...no exceptions. If you can't sign your name then whatever you said is worthless.
2. Posts with unrecognized user names will be deleted unless they include some sort of introduction in their first few posts.
Most people are not usually interested in going to the trouble of repeatedly creating new accounts/user names.
Some cowardly people will create sock puppets. On forums that strive to operate with integrity (because they value their credibility), the discovery of a sock puppet is considered the lowest possible behavior and the individual is banned.
If the admin is the only one that can see IPs, he is usually the first one, sometimes the only one, to know a person is using a sock puppet. It would be possible for the admin to selectively enforce his policy against sock puppets. But on forums that strive for integrity, admins don't risk losing the trust (and therefore their own credibility) of the members by playing such games. Sooner or later, anyone using a sock puppet will accidentally OUT himself. If that happens, the user takes his admin friend down with him.
For the most part, once a forum expresses an intent to operate with integrity, the members rise to the occasion. It takes a certain type of person to prefer cowardly game playing over real conversation with real people. The forum rules or lack thereof, set the bar.
I cant give much info right now due to it puts a person in harms way. But the circus is organized . I have real good intel. I will tell more when I can. But keep eyes on his 2 nd hand man. Everything else is a smoke screen. It will be funny to see who wins being head
It wouldn't surprise me to see Willy go in a different direction. It's hard to imagine him agreeing to be anything less than the top dog of any organization he might join. However, he is egotistical enough to believe he could displace an incumbent in short order, lol.
Anon i am throwing the bs flag here and go on a limb that schied is no longer working with bill. Actually this is confirmed by myself basically mr schied is back tonhis orginal libertarian friends.
Operating an Internet Forum with Integrity: Forums 101
It is as simple as making and enforcing two rules:
1. All unidentified posts will be deleted...no exceptions. If you can't sign your name then whatever you said is worthless.
2. Posts with unrecognized user names will be deleted unless they include some sort of introduction in their first few posts.
Most people are not usually interested in going to the trouble of repeatedly creating new accounts/user names.
Some cowardly people will create sock puppets. On forums that strive to operate with integrity (because they value their credibility), the discovery of a sock puppet is considered the lowest possible behavior and the individual is banned.
If the admin is the only one that can see IPs, he is usually the first one, sometimes the only one, to know a person is using a sock puppet. It would be possible for the admin to selectively enforce his policy against sock puppets. But on forums that strive for integrity, admins don't risk losing the trust (and therefore their own credibility) of the members by playing such games. Sooner or later, anyone using a sock puppet will accidentally OUT himself. If that happens, the user takes his admin friend down with him.
For the most part, once a forum expresses an intent to operate with integrity, the members rise to the occasion. It takes a certain type of person to prefer cowardly game playing over real conversation with real people. The forum rules or lack thereof, set the bar.
Okay, this is a blog, not a forum, as someone has already said above me. And, I notice that with all your integrity Susan, you didn't bother to link to the source of the rules and guidance you attempted to enforce here.
I would at this point support deleting all of your posts as Anon. You already know you aren't wanted here, yet you persist in inflicting your brand of obnoxious by posting anyway. Why is that? I mean I know you are lonely, but still...
@Brannon and Oceans: Neither of you have a clue. This IS an internet forum…look it up. Oceans, if you don’t see a citation what does that tell you?
The two of you seem quite touchy on this subject. How many sock puppets do the two of you use? Why are you afraid to take responsibility for your posts?
The inner circle does not want a forum with integrity. The antonym of integrity is dishonesty and the inner circle clearly embraces that.
I only offered the information in response to The Hopper’s post at 2:41. The Hopper makes it sound like there is no practical way to encourage, much less force people here to act with integrity. That is ridiculous.
It makes no difference to me what you do. I have always avoided dishonest forums like the plague. But before Joey, I had never seen a dishonest forum, that focused on telling someone else to clean up his act! The hypocrisy fascinates me.
I followed you all into the gutter to see what it was like. I’ve gotten an eyeful, lol As it turns out, it’s kind of fun to forget about honesty, integrity, civility, etc. for a while and who better to disregard those things with than the GENII?
Clean up this forum or don’t, watching you people will be entertaining either way.
This is why I call you all the GENII, sigh. Most blogs are NOT forums but this one is. Most blogs only allow comments on the exact subject matter of the article posted by the owner. A “FORUM” is a place where anyone can post about anything.
THIS is a forum. You are using blog technology to run it, but it is a FORUM. It’s like you are using a horse and plow when you could so easily be using a tractor, but the end result is the same. People post about anything they want here, the same as they would on a BB or a mailing list or any other type of forum.
If you carefully read your own links, you might be able to find the clues that show you they are not talking about THIS kind of blog when they say that blogs are not forums. I don’t feel like taking the time to point it all out to you, but it’s there.
I'd like to think this would help but I do know better, lol.
@LKM, I find your obsession with my identity odd. What does it matter who I am? Why do you care? Would it matter if I am Willy or one of his followers? What about if I were a SC? What if I am your CO? So what?
You should judge what I say by what I say rather than by some agenda you think might be behind them. IF I am your CO would that make everything I say right? If I am a SC does that mean everything I say is wrong? smh
One of my neighbors was a very conservative Christian, and a mild mannered family type. Buff and rugged, but scarred from his time in service as an explosives ordinance tech. I am reminded of him just now, as his bumper sticker said, "If you've never been to the Gulf, then shut the hell up."
If I remember correctly, when I started posting here one of my old user names from a previous forum came up automatically. That name was Angel Shark. Soon after, I got rid of that name and began using my Susan Harbision account. When I changed names here, I ANNOUNCED I had done so.
What you are not getting is that sock puppets are all about trying to make others think there are two separate people posting in one forum, when the two people are really just one. People can change their screen names all they want...as long as they let people know they are, for example, the poster formerly known as Angel Shark, now posting as Susan Harbison. This way no one is deceived into thinking the new name is a NEW poster.
I don't know who Stacey is. I must have really hit a nerve with you "OReader". How many names are you using?
When It comes down to it, Susan is jealous of the clubhouse and Jealous of how great LKM is in the writing, she can attempt to deny this, but its quite easy to see thru her
I agree Brannon 100%. Susan can try and twist anything and everything into her warped sense of reality. Yes, this is a blog. We come here, with other like minded people to comment on the original post. Her problem is that she doesn't have any like minded people over at her FORUM of ONE. I have never seen other blogs not allow comments that are not on topic to the blog writer, so what she's trying so desperately to justify, just solidified that she is wrong.
Every time she posts some stupid comeback to someone, she has to keep coming back again and again to force her opinions on others. It really doesn't matter what we say, she just HAS to be right, no matter how wrong she is. Her views are not that of reality, so she won't see how wrong she is. That's the Vexi in her.
OReader, I agree. She is a BFB! Of course she will assume we have something to hide, instead of the clear point that she is simply an obnoxious, arrogant, narcissistic troll, who can not be wrong, EVER, in her mind. (Again, that's why no one hangs out on her page. She can't find any others that share her warped, one sided views)
LNM, your writing rocks. Ignore the jealous troll, who doesn't fit in anywhere.
And, why does it matter if this is a blog or forum? If we don't care which it is or what it's called, I don't understand why it would be such an issue to somebody else. Especially someone that shouldn't be here in the first place.
Oh and Suze, I didn't stuh-stuh-stuh-stutter, I said "by your definition above" when I made reference to your multiple screennames (or "handles" as you old folks would really prefer to call 'em.) How in the heck would I know what a forum or a blog or a sock puppet or a proxy is? Little 'ol me has to depend on 'ol Suzie Q for my edumacation.
LKN: There you go with one of your off the wall posts @ 2:00. I really do think you post under the influence... that is the only way I can explain these incidents. I assume you are asking anon (July 3) 6:17 and Oceans the question of who cares whether it's a blog or a forum. They are the ones taking issue with it.
O'reader: Yes, I saw your definition and I elaborated on MY definition in response. That's what people do when they see someone else has gotten the wrong idea. What part of that don't you get? Who asked why you don't post much and who cares? It's quite interesting (and telling) how touchy you, Oceans, and Brannon are about this subject. There is nothing like shaking the bushes to bring out the rodents.
Poor Susan, you really shouldn't ASSume anything, especially when you can't even remember who posted what. One would think it's not censorship you are worried about but your inability to remember conversations and send your bitter hate towards the right person. And drug addicts and alcoholics don't get to walk where I've walked. Jealous much?
Actually Suze, I didn't define anything. You did. I just pointed out the obvious omissions in your definition. That's what people do when they see someone has portrayed an incomplete idea. What part of that don't you get? Did I say that I was asked that I didn't post as much? Nope, I didn't. You'd like to attribute several screennames to one person. I was just pointing out that my frequency of posts has diminished during my busier time at work. I did however give you a list of screennames that I HAVE (yay random caps) used as "sockpuppets" as you say.
Here's an idea for you, why don't you tell me what other names I post under, I'm really curious. Apparently we all have multiple personalities here. Why don't you enlighten us all?
Then again, maybe you were correct in that I'm psychic and I know exactly what to say to confuse you. A drugged psychic. LMAO. Have fun explaining that to law enforcement.
"Most blogs only allow comments on the exact subject matter of the article posted by the owner. A “FORUM” is a place where anyone can post about anything."
I don't care whether this "place" is a blog or a forum, but I do care that "Susan" posts comments like the above, when it is "Susan" who is responsible for probably 95% of all non-exact subject matter comments on this blog/forum/whoreallycareswhatitisbutyou.
IMO, communicating with "Susan" is a waste of everyone's time. With her intent being to derail the opportunity for focused discussion/comments about the con-man and his con(s), my suggestion is to either give her full-on crickets, or suggest an admin try to reply to her each of her posts with nothing but her IP address and a tag such as "Anon/Susan Harbison/Angel Shark..."
The second option would give her some of the attention she so desperately craves, while serving as a warning to others that it's her--who would hopefully then give her the all-out cricket treatment. But, knowing what trips her trigger, she'll probably go off-the-chart OCD and post hundreds of comments in succession in an attempt to exhaust the admin. Maybe option would be the better choice - all-out crickets.
Thanks for providing this platform (which uses blog technology) to share my opinion on the matter.
Stacy Emerson/Life in Pierce County (not the Stacey mentioned elsewhere in the comments)
@LKM: I don't find your posts confusing. They are just disconnected, impotent efforts to contribute something to topics that always seem to be out of your realm. Maybe it's just that you are plain old stupid, but I'm guessing it's more of a substance issue. The Army will be thrilled to hear all of the alcoholics and drug addicts have been identified and discharged! And WHAT is your obsession with LE, lol?
@O'reader: I have no idea if you use other names. I can see you are pretty sensitive about the issue, lol, but beyond that, I don't know or care enough to consider what games you are playing.
@Stacy Emerson: Your idea requires people here to ignore posts. That is what sensible, mature people do, when they don't want to engage with someone. But the GENII CAN'T do it. They have to run to The Hopper and ask him to intervene because they don't know how to IGNORE someone.
Let's face it though. At this point, if The Hopper managed to stop all of the GENII enemies from posting, there would be little to no activity here. There is nothing to have "focused discussions" about so I am not interrupting a thing. You have discussed Windsor ad nauseam. Your topic has run its course. It's time for the Joeys to find a new target for their hate or close up shop.
Ok, Susan I pick you be the new target, or Sharon or whatever your name is, it's fasicnating you keep trying to say LNM is stupid, however, I can say that you are jealous of her, and also as to even if there was only 3 people that commented on here, that would and is WAAAY more then at your (partyof1) forum
It's really sad when people believe that drugs or spirits of any kind are necessary to create art. Yes, that is why the Army requires drug tests, and all of mine for the military and civilian sector have come back clean because I don't use drugs. I have no obsession with LE, but apparently Windsor does.
So just to recap: It is suspected that I am a stupid drugged psychic in the Army...and Billie thinks we are all government spies. And what drugs pray tell am I supposed to be using and where did I get them?
Y'all are all cracking me up. Except for Suze. She can't keep up with who said what. Sort of make you wonder what she's smoking, eh? I like the all-out crickets idea.
@LKM: You are over thinking your importance. I don't give you enough thought to actually have suspicions about you.
You do strike me as being off in la la land much of the time...that is a fact. Your writing is bombastic...that is a fact. YOU seem to think you are psychic, lol, but that might be part of your la la land mindset. That's as much attention as I can give you tonight, sorry!
LOL! He's gonna be busy, what with the constant trips between MT, MO, and TX that month he already has scheduled in court.. He's over extending himself. And the comedy value of his 'announcements' get funnier and funnier. "Come on out and see if the TV show host gets murdered?" OMFG....it just keeps getting dumber.
From: William Windsore [mailto:billwindsore@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:50 PM To: nobodies@att.net Subject:
Oh nooooooooo. Mr Bill Windsore is hiding in Texas. When is he goingafter his haters?? All the pie is going to waste. Question is, when is sluggo going squish your fat playdoh ass??? Ohhh nooo. Did Mr Bill go to Texas to live in his sons basement? Did he find a new special lot lizard “friend” ? Tune in to find out….
Ok I getting mad, the Joeys did not even know what a lot Lizards was! I now copy rights Lot Lizards because I should get Bill Windsor special kind of hate for that Lot Lizards
More BS hype and BS Drama, with Bill's False and Misleading headlines. The blatant bullshittery of this man is insane.
No one "picked up" the story, Bill shared the story, like he shares all his bogus stories, for the sole purpose of creating press for himself, and his name.
(From the SB.com site) "United Kingdom publication runs story about Sean Boushie offering a reward for the murder of Bill Windsor"
(Now, what's posted on the UK Twinkle) "University of Montana employee Sean Boushie offers a reward for the murder of Filmmaker Bill ... University of Montana employee Sean Boushie offers a reward ... lawlessamerica.com - "So we are starting a lottery for Texas. $5 a bet astowhere and what date Bitler (Bill Windsor) will getthe shit kicked out of him by one of the "haters" . We ..."
LOL. I used to think Bill was just a narcissist. Yunno, ate up with himself. Now? I really think he has serious mental and emotional issues. I mean really, all joking and poking aside, we have watched his narcissism go from obnoxious to scary. For those of us who have watched his public shows for a year or two, this particular story is yet one of many he embellishes along the way.
No law enforcement agency, nor court, is going to buy this. It will harm Bill more than help, in that area.
First, he accuses Boushie (and it's the same song and dance with every story) of stalking a chick he filmed.
Then, he accuses him of being a crazy man.
Then he's a crazy man, a stalker, slandered, libeler.
Next, he's all those plus a liar. Then he adds serial stalker, and 'veiled' SeTh threats.
Then he shows the world the veiled death threats....and people were scratching their heads because it was rude and over the line, but not a death threat.
Next he accuses him of all mentioned above, plus death threats. No 'veiled' included.
Then he publishes for the world (which is like a few dozen) that Boushie is a professional stalker paid by the government. Plus of course, all the above things.
Then he goes back and forth between using words like 'veiled' and 'in my opinion' and 'may be'....and using words like 'directly', 'absolutely', and 'death threats'.
He continues to publish his shocking proof of all this....but it's not proof and even if it were, it not near what he portrays it as.
Now, over a year later, the same story based on the same guy and the same emails, is 'murder' and 'offers a reward for the murder'. But....he proudly publishes proof of this, and it's not mentioning anything of murder at all. And of course, an online site where you go and post your own stories, is 'foreign countries picking up the story'.
I mean, seriously? No, I'm thinking he's way beyond narcissist. IF he prints this crap knowing its only for wow factor, he's got issues. And if he has held up in dark hotel rooms addicted in the internet world, and has told the story so many tines he believes it, he has issues. Serious ones.
At this point he may as well just hold up a picture of a cat and say it's a dog who is sending him death threats via the government. Fuck. SMH.
Seriously... That's the best he can do? He finds public documents that a five year old with Google can find. Omg he found my marriage lic, oh the horor...
Missing the point here Tiny. Point is, Bill seems to be a pathological liar. He uses stories like this for the sole purpose of promoting his name.
We've all read it before, the articles he spread far and wide that the Constitution was Void. That went across the WWW like wildfire. His name all over it.
He said the Government put a hit out on him. Claimed reliable sources (with no names) nothing tangible, no credibility to it what so ever. Just Bill writing something, usually in the third person and then sharing it to anyone and everyone stupid enough to repost it.
Looking back, these are his standard stories. Now that his .com site is hit and miss, and he lost his main FB, he is using your name .com and his twitter to blast his nonsense. (if I was you, I wouldn't feed into his sickness any more. You are just helping him promote himself, if you are sending the emails.)
He loves the drama, and I know someone has the screen shot of him saying just that. Anyone and everyone who doesn't buy his drama and stories, becomes the story. He is the only one who is allowed their first amendment rights. Do not speak the truth of what you have witnessed, or you will be hunted and sued.
He writes his own headlines (in third party) as if he is famous. LNM's headline here was spot on. Full of enablers who help him promote his lies through the WWW.
Some times, some people don't need an IP addy or a screen name to know who is posting under Anonymous. I'm pointing that out because I know who I'm responding to and I want to make it clear my intention is not to pick a fight. I just can't stand that Bill has handled this situation so poorly that he does appear to be more crazy than the accused in this case. The accused has several people on this site bamboozled and this site is about uncovering truth.
The accused will deny every bit, as has been his MO, of what I am about to say. Nobody in this story is innocent. Or completely sane. But, in piecing together information (1st and 3rd parties all over the web) from research that was done last fall when the accused showed up on this site, and bits/pieces to date, here is the history:
The accused's father and the chick filmed were neighbors years ago. They appeared to be good neighbors at one time, then had a falling out. The father took issue with the chick's sexual orientation. The chick accused the father of lewd behavior. The accused became involved and escalated the situation. It appears the chick moved away and it all died down.
Until, one day the accused interfered with his father in law's rights under the 2nd amendment. The chick, having moved back to MT, decided to stand up for dad in law. This appears to have opened old wounds and started the war. The accused started a cyber campaign of terror against the chick. Even to the point of interfering in a suit against the chick for which he has absolutely no interest or claim (just like Bill threatening to interfere in the child custody case of friend of ours). Unfortunately for the chick, she is just as evil as the accused and has handled the situation just as badly as Bill. Regardless of what the chick has or has not done, the accused has done everything he accused of doing. Including recruitment of others to harass and terrorize the chick.
It was in pursuit of stalking the chick that the accused happened onto Bill. Bill was tempted with an offer of donation if he would provide the accused with the physical location and time of the chick's filming. And that's where the whole thing with Bill vs the accused started. Regardless of what Bill has or has not done, the accused has done everything he is accused of doing.
The accused is sending e-mails, making veiled threats, not so veiled threats, making obscene comments and lying about it. His purpose on this site appears to be recruitment of the unwitting to join his campaign of harassment. Just as he did with the chick. Between last fall and now, the accused has deleted incriminating data from the web. A lot is still out there if you care to search.
As regards the father in law, I don't think he should have a gun either. He appears to be a SovCit. He and some pals were arrested for conspiracy to kidnap a judge and a weapons violation. Charges were dropped or reduced, I don't recall which. But, the accused's efforts to stop the process didn't matter. The father in law has the right to own a gun, just like the accused. Based on the behavior of the accused, IMO he shouldn't be allowed that right either.
And Bill is a fool for stepping foot in the State of Montana.
@Ninja, ya I understand. I'm not sending him the emails, btw, somebody else is having fun, or he's sending them to himself, just like Cox used to.I have a lead on maybe who. Wouldn't surprise me if he is schitzo just like her. Or maybe its Walter.. Ignoring him pisses him off the most. He's just trying to get a legal reaction or some attention like a little child. Ssdd, kinda boring and repetitive. And all lies, as if he's going to actually come here pfffft drama equals cash to him. . Looks like he's going to have a big press confrence now.
Um...ya, the picture he posted was taken ten years ago in San Diego. Day 25 of the pie tour, 2003. But? He kinda likes it, and somebody took it, like Bozzy, so he posted it.
I'm sure you've found the original, so you have conclusive, undeniable proof that someone else was holding the camera. Otherwise, I'm sure that 10 years ago in San Diego it would have been impossible for Bill to take a selfie.
I was just KIDDING. Geez. Lighten up. Not like he doesn't post selfie's all the time.
"We met Allen, Bill, and Walter at the Balboa Park Visitor's Center. We had a nice chat, and when Bill (http://members.aol.com/otpadre/Welcome.htm) commented on the beads I was wearing, he asked if we had been to Mardi Gras. No, I explained that the beads were a gift from the Floating Neutrinos. Then I told them the whole story of meeting Poppa and Aurelia Neutrino (Day 18). I explained that I don't normally wear beads, but I am a little superstitious, and I figured anyone who floats on a raft from New York to Spain and lives to tell about it has some good luck going on, so I will continue to wear the beads. Bill then took off his Hawaiian Lei and gave it to me. How nice! It matched my outfit really well. My beads are green, purple, and white, and now I had a lovely purple, green, and yellow lei to wear with the beads. I did notice the stares from men became a little more shocked-looking once I added the lei. It may be a little too much color for most men. Some guys just can't wear purple."
Great article LNM!
ReplyDeleteHis limited run at celebrity stature can never undo his life long history of failure and the great harm he has caused to others.
So very true! The amount of pain Bill has caused to so many is insurmountable.
Yes, it is a fantastic article. I really like all the comparisons of the enablers. Those that watched and did nothing, those that stood by and encouraged him, ignoring the warning signs, or worse, excusing them altogether. Perfect!
ReplyDeleteTalking about enabling, 5 people posted comments after Bill said "I snapped this with the camera resting on my left arm as I drove down the highway at 70"
Delete3 people "liked" his comment. Not one person said anything to him about how dangerous it is to other motorists on the road, while he's busy snapping pictures, instead of paying attention to the road. He does this all the time, taking pictures while he's driving. This is just reckless, and complete disregard for others around him. Unbelievable.
Bill Windsor changed his cover photo.
ReplyDelete2 hours ago.FACEBOOK SUSPENDS BILL WINDSOR FOR 12 HOURS FOR POSTING THIS PHOTO.
Perhaps there is nudity in the dark.
To reach Bill Windsor and Lawless America, email nobodies@att.net
Bill Windsor Susan, I snapped this with the camera resting on my left arm as I drove down the highway at 70.
DeleteAnother day another lie.
DeleteHis personal FB is all he has left so he wouldn't dare chance reposting a picture that caused a "timeout". I'm betting he posted some info on someone like SB / against TOS. I'm sure FB has Billy on a very short leash.
I reported all the pictures of women asking for personel info last night on his State pages .... I would like to get them close down too
DeleteThat is correct... he posted links to his me.com, so I had it removed. So, he just movs the info to a new photo. hes figured out that its hard to report the comments made on a photo without reporting the photo. I now have the direct # to complaints. Not really a big deal, but I like that it pisses him off...
Deleteon the Texas pages there is thing about Brannon, he could get facebook to close that page
Deletethe Brannon thing is gone
Deletehe must be reading the blogs again
he never stops reading this blog
Delete@ LNM: Good job.
ReplyDeleteThank you, NBTDT, and All. You have been part of my journey thru this thing.
Delete◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘
ReplyDeleteHey Kids...it's finally here!
WINDSOR UNLEASHED ~ Episode 2
◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘ ◘
Bravo Sluggo. Another hit! Loved it!
DeleteTurtle armor...so that is why he spins in circles. Thanks for the laugh.
DeleteFantastic Sluggo!! Wow, that looks like a lot of work.
DeleteLove the Mission Rediculous!
Lol. Can't stalk this. I wanna subscribe to Sluggo tv
DeleteHileffinarious!!!!!
DeleteSluggo, I thought the middle portion of the video—the monologue which wasn't actually all that "rant"y at all—was eloquent and valuable.
DeleteThe rest... well, as we've discussed previously, it's not my cup of tea. But you make a good case for yourself (and even for the value you place on the material I don't much like) in between. Kudos.
Very good, Slug.
DeleteBill Windsor.BILL WINDSOR AND LAWLESS AMERICA VISIT A BAIL BONDS BUSINESS ACROSS FROM THE ELLIS COUNTY JAIL.
ReplyDeletePerhaps this is the bail bondsman that Brannon Bridge will use to post bond if he is arrested for his crimes against Bill Windsor
https://www.facebook.com/#!/permalink.php?story_fbid=112370495603411&id=100583116782149
BILL WINDSOR AND LAWLESS AMERICA SPEND TIME AT THE MONOLITHIC DOME INSTITUTE IN ITALY TEXAS.
DeleteI spent time today investigating another of my stalkers...the one who has made "veiled" threats to beat me with a hammer -- Brannon Bridge. I dro...ve by his home at 3 Maree Court, Waxahachie Texas for some photos. I also spent time in Italy Texas where Brannon Bridge works -- Monolithic Dome Institute. Both his place of work and his street are spooky places. After viewing some of the sick videos that Brannon Bridge has produced to harass me, I suspect that he is mentally ill....I mean really really sick in the head. I hope he will be institutionalized.
To reach Bill Windsor and Lawless America, email nobodies@att.net
I'm sure you know what you're talking about right? lol By the way you spelled your God's name incorrectly, it's Yahweh, not Yawhew. Thanks for playing :)
ReplyDeleteSo you're without sin 9:37?
ReplyDeleteThe gates of he'll are opening wide, I mean really wide, for the big butts of Ginger Snap and Yappy, chased by demon dogs, to enter the gates of the hell of the media's cruel glare. Smile.
ReplyDeletelmfao Hilarious
Deleteyeah the gates of "he'll" and yawhew. This is candid camera right?
Hey 10:02 I have a question that'll prolly make sense to you.
DeleteDo you walk to work or take a lunch?
Too much sacrificial wine?
ReplyDeleteThe vultures have arrived to pick at the carcass of this blog.
ReplyDeleteYour laugh will ring hollow as the monster devours the wicked in the glare of TV cameras and grayscale print. Of course, as big as their butts are it will take a little while.
ReplyDeleteOk freaky nut, off you go, the insane asylum called and reported you MIA
Deletewoooohooo, we are gonna be on TV. We finally got a piece of that pie. Too bad its going to be on the gayscale
DeleteIt makes the title of this post so apt, the fame of your choice will destroy you. That self-flattering resume won't mean a thing when they learn about your secret identity.
ReplyDeleteOooooo a secret identity? cool! lol
DeleteI'm batman
DeleteOk. Maybe I'll be batfink?
DeleteI would do just as you, laugh, make merry, even drink a little wine.
Deleteyah I hear you're down to 8 or 10 bottles a night. wtg!
Deleteuhmmm Yahweh always has my back, and so does any and every other god out there, der
ReplyDeleteObviously, your wicked eyes cannot be directed to the Almighty tonight so I'll go make another drink and pray for you.
ReplyDeleteThat's some special cray cray right here folks ^^^
DeleteGo smoke so more meth 11:26
DeleteSluggo I am still laughing at the bumper of the car reading www.currentlyunavailable.com that was awesome.
ReplyDeleteI understand that devotion, but I think you might need to be mote skeptical of bloggers who trashed you every chance they got until you started doing their dirty work. They will throw you to the wolves when it helps them to do so.
ReplyDeleteDo there dirty work? Why cause I love to make videos? Also i do my own dirty work and had told you that I stayed out of the shit between you and them I have kept that part and then You go and unfriend me, geez way to go....n also no one mentioned you or "summoned you" well I guess the Pro abortionist did though today at the Texas Capital, they were chanting "Hail Satan" so go be with those who summom you
ReplyDelete"mote" skeptical? Better watch it, there are grammar cops lurking around here...
ReplyDeleteAnd to clarify, we never trashed LB, we teased him. How can you not laugh at morph suits and some of videos?
ReplyDeleteAlso, the "Beetlejuice" thing really only works for Attorney. Truth be known, if somebody said your name it was in trying to insult me. I wasn't insulted, were you?
Brannon; you crossed sides. I've never said an unkind word to you or about you. And I won't, but you have chosen a different route from what you previously traveled. I complimented you on one of your videos about the clubhouse. Others have been a little troubling. Actually, I defended you when Windsor's people contacted me about them. Your associations at this point make me uncomfortable, and that is why I unfriended you. It really had nothing to do with my opinion of you.
ReplyDeleteI never crossed sides
ReplyDeleteNBTDT: you usually are more honest than most of the people on this blog, but that is a lie. I won't repeat what you said out of sensitivity for Brannon, but that is bullshit. I expected better from you.
ReplyDeleteIm not sensitive, so spill it
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete@ LB: did I say something about the mouse eating?
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to do that. It's all in their archives for you to read if you want. But I can promise you that no one was "teasing" you. The remarks were mean-spirited and designed to inflict anguish.
ReplyDeleteYou are full of it and making sh*t up. We enjoyed the heck out LB's videos, we couldn't wait for the next one. The ones when he summoned the force were my favorites.
ReplyDeleteDavid Schmuck is setting up meetings at Schieds house ..Windsor isnt dead either is LA ...the circus is still performing ......
ReplyDeleteBefore Joey's trials you know damned good and well what was said. You are lying.
ReplyDeleteNope. I have no idea WTF you are talking about. Lying is not my thing. I have never lied to you, don't have a reason to lie to you. Why would I start now?
ReplyDeleteLet me go ahead and clear something up, I stayed out of the attacks, between you and them, It was out of respect for both parties, there was never any sides crossed, however It was really fuckin hard to stay out of it, but I did, I have however noticed that after the initial shit between you and the blog I had seen that they asked you to leave, do to your vulgarness, and pettiness (I stayed out of it), I also remember you saying, you would not come back if they didn't mention you and I told you if someone mentioned your name then I would go after them, but (no one did), and then you get on and repost 5 times about how they did, so see you keep this shit going, posting all this "anon" bullshit and I personally don't give a shit anymore, the shit you said was horrible, and the shit that was said about you was horrible, but you were the vindictive shit that was keeping it going, and I would just suggest that the next letter you write to Joey, let him know how much you have come on here and harrassed people, I will write him soon though
ReplyDeleteBrannon, I do not answer to Joey about fucking anything. And I certainly do not answer to you. My relationship with Joey in correspondence continues to be professional and out of kindness I continue to report news about the lake area. My interest in this blog is none of your business so get over it.
ReplyDelete@ Webb: The more I think about your last posts the more ticked off I've gotten. Especially as regards to this comment "The remarks were mean-spirited and designed to inflict anguish."
ReplyDeleteI distinctly recall defending Brannon's loyalty to Joey. I admire Brannon for standing by his friend and I have told him so many, many times. To this day I tell Brannon that is one aspect of his personality that drew me to him. God knows I am not and have never been afraid to post the truth about any topic - even my admiration for Brannon when it wasn't the most popular thing to do or say.
Whatever your motivation is, making crap up and calling me names isn't going to work for you. I honestly hoped that you and others on this blog could come to a Kumbaya point in life and we could all get along. But, I'm over it. Put me down as "crossed sides" with Brannon.
Anon post us more info on Schmuck. Great usage of yiddish words. I love it.
ReplyDeleteMorning,... Im wondering if Bitler didnt get suspended by Fb yet again... hes going bat crap crazy on twitter, but quiet on FB?
ReplyDeleteWho is Michael Spreadbur
ReplyDeleteOoops Michael Spreadbury
ReplyDeleteA local loon, friend of Cox and Bitler. He is a convicted Felon.
ReplyDeleteWell, a felony is a felony but it's not like he robbed banks, committed all the rapes at U of M, cyber stalked folks or sent death threats. More like civil disobedience. He plead guilty and received a deferred sentence.
Deletehttp://ravallirepublic.com/news/article_1cf7310e-fd82-566e-849a-762709c9f36b.html
http://www.ravallirepublic.com/news/local/article_6f14b7ce-d931-11df-88e6-001cc4c03286.html
@2:12: Nap time again.
Delete2:12 is Sean Boushie
DeleteStupid Susan 6:01
Delete"2:12 is Sean Boushie" ummmmmmm. Wrong again, now shut up and go away. You are just like bitler, pay attention to me, pay attention to me....
DeleteYa right
DeletePfffttt, snoozer.
DeleteIt's not him on Twitter. And he's been busy the past few days.
ReplyDeleteMost of the post are from the woman in south dakota. The ones from this morning are just him repeating his vomit from me.com.
ReplyDeleteSD, ME, and TN, all tweet.
ReplyDeleteGs with so many anons is it
ReplyDeletePossible to force them to choose a name?
its possible, but they would have to give up an email attached with the name, plus there really isn't any guarantee that it would solve much as they could just keep making up new sign in names
DeleteOperating an Internet Forum with Integrity: Forums 101
DeleteIt is as simple as making and enforcing two rules:
1. All unidentified posts will be deleted...no exceptions. If you can't sign your name then whatever you said is worthless.
2. Posts with unrecognized user names will be deleted unless they include some sort of introduction in their first few posts.
Most people are not usually interested in going to the trouble of repeatedly creating new accounts/user names.
Some cowardly people will create sock puppets. On forums that strive to operate with integrity (because they value their credibility), the discovery of a sock puppet is considered the lowest possible behavior and the individual is banned.
If the admin is the only one that can see IPs, he is usually the first one, sometimes the only one, to know a person is using a sock puppet. It would be possible for the admin to selectively enforce his policy against sock puppets. But on forums that strive for integrity, admins don't risk losing the trust (and therefore their own credibility) of the members by playing such games. Sooner or later, anyone using a sock puppet will accidentally OUT himself. If that happens, the user takes his admin friend down with him.
For the most part, once a forum expresses an intent to operate with integrity, the members rise to the occasion. It takes a certain type of person to prefer cowardly game playing over real conversation with real people. The forum rules or lack thereof, set the bar.
5:56 is an unidentified post
DeleteDelete because whatever they said is worthless
I cant give much info right now due to it puts a person in harms way. But the circus is organized . I have real good intel. I will tell more when I can. But keep eyes on his 2 nd hand man. Everything else is a smoke screen. It will be funny to see who wins being head
ReplyDeleteIt wouldn't surprise me to see Willy go in a different direction. It's hard to imagine him agreeing to be anything less than the top dog of any organization he might join. However, he is egotistical enough to believe he could displace an incumbent in short order, lol.
DeleteYAY!!!! I love circus's can I be a trapeze artist walker thing
ReplyDeleteAnon i am throwing the bs flag here and go on a limb that schied is no longer working with bill. Actually this is confirmed by myself basically mr schied is back tonhis orginal libertarian friends.
ReplyDelete@ m: I'm calling bs too. You haven't done anything but flap your lips. Looks to me like you are just another troll here to just cause trouble.
DeleteIm not a damn troll . Just like u NBTT always running mouth. In time Ill share more.Didnt take much to get some info thats not bs. Troll please
DeleteOperating an Internet Forum with Integrity: Forums 101
ReplyDeleteIt is as simple as making and enforcing two rules:
1. All unidentified posts will be deleted...no exceptions. If you can't sign your name then whatever you said is worthless.
2. Posts with unrecognized user names will be deleted unless they include some sort of introduction in their first few posts.
Most people are not usually interested in going to the trouble of repeatedly creating new accounts/user names.
Some cowardly people will create sock puppets. On forums that strive to operate with integrity (because they value their credibility), the discovery of a sock puppet is considered the lowest possible behavior and the individual is banned.
If the admin is the only one that can see IPs, he is usually the first one, sometimes the only one, to know a person is using a sock puppet. It would be possible for the admin to selectively enforce his policy against sock puppets. But on forums that strive for integrity, admins don't risk losing the trust (and therefore their own credibility) of the members by playing such games. Sooner or later, anyone using a sock puppet will accidentally OUT himself. If that happens, the user takes his admin friend down with him.
For the most part, once a forum expresses an intent to operate with integrity, the members rise to the occasion. It takes a certain type of person to prefer cowardly game playing over real conversation with real people. The forum rules or lack thereof, set the bar.
5:55 & 5:56 is an unidentified post
DeleteDelete because whatever they said is worthless
This is a blog. This is not a forum. You are welcome to leave.
Deletealso Susan, thanks for the advice um also, for these very reasons, your post always get deleted:
DeleteIt is as simple as making and enforcing two rules:
1. All unidentified posts will be deleted...no exceptions. If you can't sign your name then whatever you said is worthless.
2. Posts with unrecognized user names will be deleted unless they include some sort of introduction in their first few posts.
Susan would you please post your crap under one name so I know to skip over them
DeleteOkay, this is a blog, not a forum, as someone has already said above me. And, I notice that with all your integrity Susan, you didn't bother to link to the source of the rules and guidance you attempted to enforce here.
DeleteI would at this point support deleting all of your posts as Anon. You already know you aren't wanted here, yet you persist in inflicting your brand of obnoxious by posting anyway. Why is that? I mean I know you are lonely, but still...
Go play with some fireworks and gasoline Susan.
@Brannon and Oceans: Neither of you have a clue. This IS an internet forum…look it up. Oceans, if you don’t see a citation what does that tell you?
DeleteThe two of you seem quite touchy on this subject. How many sock puppets do the two of you use? Why are you afraid to take responsibility for your posts?
The inner circle does not want a forum with integrity. The antonym of integrity is dishonesty and the inner circle clearly embraces that.
I only offered the information in response to The Hopper’s post at 2:41. The Hopper makes it sound like there is no practical way to encourage, much less force people here to act with integrity. That is ridiculous.
It makes no difference to me what you do. I have always avoided dishonest forums like the plague. But before Joey, I had never seen a dishonest forum, that focused on telling someone else to clean up his act! The hypocrisy fascinates me.
I followed you all into the gutter to see what it was like. I’ve gotten an eyeful, lol As it turns out, it’s kind of fun to forget about honesty, integrity, civility, etc. for a while and who better to disregard those things with than the GENII?
Clean up this forum or don’t, watching you people will be entertaining either way.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deleteok, Bitch ass, I decided to take your advice, and look it up:
Deletehttp://www.differencebetween.net/technology/difference-between-forum-and-blog/
now Susan what you have is a Forum, what Ginger has is a blog, just in case your to stupid I'll post multiple links:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2007/01/26/whats-the-difference-between-a-blog-and-a-forum
http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/01/28/understanding-the-difference-between-forums-blogs-and-social-networks/
http://support.etouch.net/cm/wiki/?id=65089
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_a_blog_and_a_forum
http://ezinearticles.com/?Do-You-Know-the-Difference-Between-a-Blog-and-a-Forum?&id=6320581
http://www.warriorforum.com/main-internet-marketing-discussion-forum/764066-what-difference-between-blog-articles-newsletters.html
In case those weren't enough for Susan, here are a few more.
Deletehttp://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=966891
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjMuVmeauAo
http://www.differencebetween.info/difference-between-forum-and-blog
Who is holding the sock puppet named Susan?
DeleteThis is why I call you all the GENII, sigh. Most blogs are NOT forums but this one is. Most blogs only allow comments on the exact subject matter of the article posted by the owner. A “FORUM” is a place where anyone can post about anything.
DeleteTHIS is a forum. You are using blog technology to run it, but it is a FORUM. It’s like you are using a horse and plow when you could so easily be using a tractor, but the end result is the same. People post about anything they want here, the same as they would on a BB or a mailing list or any other type of forum.
If you carefully read your own links, you might be able to find the clues that show you they are not talking about THIS kind of blog when they say that blogs are not forums. I don’t feel like taking the time to point it all out to you, but it’s there.
I'd like to think this would help but I do know better, lol.
@LKM, I find your obsession with my identity odd. What does it matter who I am? Why do you care? Would it matter if I am Willy or one of his followers? What about if I were a SC? What if I am your CO? So what?
DeleteYou should judge what I say by what I say rather than by some agenda you think might be behind them. IF I am your CO would that make everything I say right? If I am a SC does that mean everything I say is wrong? smh
Shouldn't you be studying creative writing 101?
One of my neighbors was a very conservative Christian, and a mild mannered family type. Buff and rugged, but scarred from his time in service as an explosives ordinance tech. I am reminded of him just now, as his bumper sticker said, "If you've never been to the Gulf, then shut the hell up."
DeleteBtw LKM, a sock puppet is a second alias used by a person within a single forum. It's one person, posting under two names, like The Hopper does here.
DeleteSusan Harbison is an alias and it is the only one I use here other than anon. I don't pretend to be more than one person.
So what you are really asking for is my legal name, not a second alias (sock puppet).
If I remember correctly, when I started posting here one of my old user names from a previous forum came up automatically. That name was Angel Shark. Soon after, I got rid of that name and began using my Susan Harbision account. When I changed names here, I ANNOUNCED I had done so.
DeleteWhat you are not getting is that sock puppets are all about trying to make others think there are two separate people posting in one forum, when the two people are really just one. People can change their screen names all they want...as long as they let people know they are, for example, the poster formerly known as Angel Shark, now posting as Susan Harbison. This way no one is deceived into thinking the new name is a NEW poster.
I don't know who Stacey is. I must have really hit a nerve with you "OReader". How many names are you using?
When It comes down to it, Susan is jealous of the clubhouse and Jealous of how great LKM is in the writing, she can attempt to deny this, but its quite easy to see thru her
DeleteI agree Brannon 100%. Susan can try and twist anything and everything into her warped sense of reality. Yes, this is a blog. We come here, with other like minded people to comment on the original post. Her problem is that she doesn't have any like minded people over at her FORUM of ONE. I have never seen other blogs not allow comments that are not on topic to the blog writer, so what she's trying so desperately to justify, just solidified that she is wrong.
DeleteEvery time she posts some stupid comeback to someone, she has to keep coming back again and again to force her opinions on others. It really doesn't matter what we say, she just HAS to be right, no matter how wrong she is. Her views are not that of reality, so she won't see how wrong she is. That's the Vexi in her.
OReader, I agree. She is a BFB! Of course she will assume we have something to hide, instead of the clear point that she is simply an obnoxious, arrogant, narcissistic troll, who can not be wrong, EVER, in her mind. (Again, that's why no one hangs out on her page. She can't find any others that share her warped, one sided views)
LNM, your writing rocks. Ignore the jealous troll, who doesn't fit in anywhere.
@ OReader: ROFLMAO
DeleteAnd, why does it matter if this is a blog or forum? If we don't care which it is or what it's called, I don't understand why it would be such an issue to somebody else. Especially someone that shouldn't be here in the first place.
Actually Susie, you caught me!! I actually don't comment much anymore because I make a habit of not doing it from my workplace.
DeleteHowever, I have had several names here.
Ollie Reader
Funday Monday
Funday Tuesday
Terrible Tuesday
Funday Wednesday
Wacky Wednesday
Funday Friday
Fiesta Friday
Siesta Saturday (I Just made that one up)
Funday Sunday
Oh and Suze, I didn't stuh-stuh-stuh-stutter, I said "by your definition above" when I made reference to your multiple screennames (or "handles" as you old folks would really prefer to call 'em.) How in the heck would I know what a forum or a blog or a sock puppet or a proxy is? Little 'ol me has to depend on 'ol Suzie Q for my edumacation.
DeleteThanks hun!
LKN: There you go with one of your off the wall posts @ 2:00. I really do think you post under the influence... that is the only way I can explain these incidents. I assume you are asking anon (July 3) 6:17 and Oceans the question of who cares whether it's a blog or a forum. They are the ones taking issue with it.
DeleteO'reader: Yes, I saw your definition and I elaborated on MY definition in response. That's what people do when they see someone else has gotten the wrong idea. What part of that don't you get? Who asked why you don't post much and who cares? It's quite interesting (and telling) how touchy you, Oceans, and Brannon are about this subject. There is nothing like shaking the bushes to bring out the rodents.
lmao, touchy??? really??? I'm just wasting my time engaging you in circle jerk conv. mainly cause I'm bored
DeletePoor Susan, you really shouldn't ASSume anything, especially when you can't even remember who posted what. One would think it's not censorship you are worried about but your inability to remember conversations and send your bitter hate towards the right person. And drug addicts and alcoholics don't get to walk where I've walked. Jealous much?
DeleteActually Suze, I didn't define anything. You did. I just pointed out the obvious omissions in your definition. That's what people do when they see someone has portrayed an incomplete idea. What part of that don't you get? Did I say that I was asked that I didn't post as much? Nope, I didn't. You'd like to attribute several screennames to one person. I was just pointing out that my frequency of posts has diminished during my busier time at work. I did however give you a list of screennames that I HAVE (yay random caps) used as "sockpuppets" as you say.
DeleteHere's an idea for you, why don't you tell me what other names I post under, I'm really curious. Apparently we all have multiple personalities here. Why don't you enlighten us all?
Then again, maybe you were correct in that I'm psychic and I know exactly what to say to confuse you. A drugged psychic. LMAO. Have fun explaining that to law enforcement.
Delete"Most blogs only allow comments on the exact subject matter of the article posted by the owner. A “FORUM” is a place where anyone can post about anything."
DeleteI don't care whether this "place" is a blog or a forum, but I do care that "Susan" posts comments like the above, when it is "Susan" who is responsible for probably 95% of all non-exact subject matter comments on this blog/forum/whoreallycareswhatitisbutyou.
IMO, communicating with "Susan" is a waste of everyone's time. With her intent being to derail the opportunity for focused discussion/comments about the con-man and his con(s), my suggestion is to either give her full-on crickets, or suggest an admin try to reply to her each of her posts with nothing but her IP address and a tag such as "Anon/Susan Harbison/Angel Shark..."
The second option would give her some of the attention she so desperately craves, while serving as a warning to others that it's her--who would hopefully then give her the all-out cricket treatment. But, knowing what trips her trigger, she'll probably go off-the-chart OCD and post hundreds of comments in succession in an attempt to exhaust the admin. Maybe option would be the better choice - all-out crickets.
Thanks for providing this platform (which uses blog technology) to share my opinion on the matter.
Stacy Emerson/Life in Pierce County
(not the Stacey mentioned elsewhere in the comments)
@LKM: I don't find your posts confusing. They are just disconnected, impotent efforts to contribute something to topics that always seem to be out of your realm. Maybe it's just that you are plain old stupid, but I'm guessing it's more of a substance issue. The Army will be thrilled to hear all of the alcoholics and drug addicts have been identified and discharged! And WHAT is your obsession with LE, lol?
Delete@O'reader: I have no idea if you use other names. I can see you are pretty sensitive about the issue, lol, but beyond that, I don't know or care enough to consider what games you are playing.
@Stacy Emerson: Your idea requires people here to ignore posts. That is what sensible, mature people do, when they don't want to engage with someone. But the GENII CAN'T do it. They have to run to The Hopper and ask him to intervene because they don't know how to IGNORE someone.
DeleteLet's face it though. At this point, if The Hopper managed to stop all of the GENII enemies from posting, there would be little to no activity here. There is nothing to have "focused discussions" about so I am not interrupting a thing. You have discussed Windsor ad nauseam. Your topic has run its course. It's time for the Joeys to find a new target for their hate or close up shop.
Ok, Susan I pick you be the new target, or Sharon or whatever your name is, it's fasicnating you keep trying to say LNM is stupid, however, I can say that you are jealous of her, and also as to even if there was only 3 people that commented on here, that would and is WAAAY more then at your (partyof1) forum
DeleteIt's really sad when people believe that drugs or spirits of any kind are necessary to create art. Yes, that is why the Army requires drug tests, and all of mine for the military and civilian sector have come back clean because I don't use drugs. I have no obsession with LE, but apparently Windsor does.
DeleteSo just to recap: It is suspected that I am a stupid drugged psychic in the Army...and Billie thinks we are all government spies. And what drugs pray tell am I supposed to be using and where did I get them?
DeleteY'all are all cracking me up. Except for Suze. She can't keep up with who said what. Sort of make you wonder what she's smoking, eh? I like the all-out crickets idea.
DeleteBrannon, I'll gladly be your new hate target. It is too fun watching you all chase your tails dreaming up endless "facts". Feel free!
Delete@LKM: You are over thinking your importance. I don't give you enough thought to actually have suspicions about you.
DeleteYou do strike me as being off in la la land much of the time...that is a fact. Your writing is bombastic...that is a fact. YOU seem to think you are psychic, lol, but that might be part of your la la land mindset. That's as much attention as I can give you tonight, sorry!
07/03/2013 Foreign Document Filed
ReplyDeleteOther Final Disposition
from Allie and Pie Man lawsuit
Notice
DeletePro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Amended Pleadings with Exhibit A attached. (8 faxed pages)
Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
Resource Limit Is Reached
ReplyDeleteThe website is temporarily unable to service your request as it exceeded resource limit. Please try again later.
from tiny.com hate page
Very true, about at my limit.....
DeleteYAY!!! Tiny, now it's set to July 24th
DeleteLOL! He's gonna be busy, what with the constant trips between MT, MO, and TX that month he already has scheduled in court.. He's over extending himself. And the comedy value of his 'announcements' get funnier and funnier. "Come on out and see if the TV show host gets murdered?" OMFG....it just keeps getting dumber.
DeleteThat should read, this month and next month.
DeleteDang it!!! Pies go back in the freezer.....I bertrer go disarm the claymores too....
Delete1. Universities do not have teachers, they have instructors and professors. We have a psychotherapy department , so... Just sayin.....
2. This is the funny one.......... Its summer, there aren't any students!!!!
Pfffftttt whatever fat man, bring it. I was born ready....
From: William Windsore [mailto:billwindsore@yahoo.com]
DeleteSent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:50 PM
To: nobodies@att.net
Subject:
Oh nooooooooo. Mr Bill Windsore is hiding in Texas. When is he goingafter his haters?? All the pie is going to waste. Question is, when is sluggo going squish your fat playdoh ass??? Ohhh nooo. Did Mr Bill go to Texas to live in his sons basement? Did he find a new special lot lizard “friend” ? Tune in to find out….
Ok I getting mad, the Joeys did not even know what a lot Lizards was! I now copy rights Lot Lizards because I should get Bill Windsor special kind of hate for that Lot Lizards
DeleteWhat? The Joeys have been using Lot Lizard for a couple months now
DeleteI told yappy..... I am just playing with Bill, sorry my dry Humor was not funny
DeleteSigh.... Now 20 days to piemagedon......
ReplyDeleteSluggo... Need a new poster... I hope I don't have to refund the tickets to the ass kickin contest....
~~~~~ Happy 4th of July to all! ~~~~~~
ReplyDeleteHappy 4th Yappy.
DeleteI hope everyone has a happy and safe 4th of July.
May there be fireworks and fun for all...Happy Independence Day to my club house pals...you know who you are!
DeleteMore BS hype and BS Drama, with Bill's False and Misleading headlines. The blatant bullshittery of this man is insane.
ReplyDeleteNo one "picked up" the story, Bill shared the story, like he shares all his bogus stories, for the sole purpose of creating press for himself, and his name.
(From the SB.com site)
"United Kingdom publication runs story about Sean Boushie offering a reward for the murder of Bill Windsor"
(Now, what's posted on the UK Twinkle)
"University of Montana employee Sean Boushie offers a reward for the murder of Filmmaker Bill ...
University of Montana employee Sean Boushie offers a reward ...
lawlessamerica.com - "So we are starting a lottery for Texas. $5 a bet astowhere and what date Bitler (Bill Windsor) will getthe shit kicked out of him by one of the "haters" . We ..."
Shared by
William M. Windsor
Another part of the SB.com article-
Delete"What this guy does is so outrageous that we even find magazines and newspapers in other countries picking up the story."
LOL. I used to think Bill was just a narcissist. Yunno, ate up with himself. Now? I really think he has serious mental and emotional issues. I mean really, all joking and poking aside, we have watched his narcissism go from obnoxious to scary. For those of us who have watched his public shows for a year or two, this particular story is yet one of many he embellishes along the way.
DeleteNo law enforcement agency, nor court, is going to buy this. It will harm Bill more than help, in that area.
First, he accuses Boushie (and it's the same song and dance with every story) of stalking a chick he filmed.
Then, he accuses him of being a crazy man.
Then he's a crazy man, a stalker, slandered, libeler.
Next, he's all those plus a liar. Then he adds serial stalker, and 'veiled' SeTh threats.
Then he shows the world the veiled death threats....and people were scratching their heads because it was rude and over the line, but not a death threat.
Next he accuses him of all mentioned above, plus death threats. No 'veiled' included.
Then he publishes for the world (which is like a few dozen) that Boushie is a professional stalker paid by the government. Plus of course, all the above things.
Then he goes back and forth between using words like 'veiled' and 'in my opinion' and 'may be'....and using words like 'directly', 'absolutely', and 'death threats'.
He continues to publish his shocking proof of all this....but it's not proof and even if it were, it not near what he portrays it as.
Now, over a year later, the same story based on the same guy and the same emails, is 'murder' and 'offers a reward for the murder'. But....he proudly publishes proof of this, and it's not mentioning anything of murder at all. And of course, an online site where you go and post your own stories, is 'foreign countries picking up the story'.
I mean, seriously? No, I'm thinking he's way beyond narcissist. IF he prints this crap knowing its only for wow factor, he's got issues. And if he has held up in dark hotel rooms addicted in the internet world, and has told the story so many tines he believes it, he has issues. Serious ones.
At this point he may as well just hold up a picture of a cat and say it's a dog who is sending him death threats via the government. Fuck. SMH.
For the love of drama, man, take the meds!
Seriously... That's the best he can do? He finds public documents that a five year old with Google can find. Omg he found my marriage lic, oh the horor...
DeleteMissing the point here Tiny. Point is, Bill seems to be a pathological liar. He uses stories like this for the sole purpose of promoting his name.
DeleteWe've all read it before, the articles he spread far and wide that the Constitution was Void. That went across the WWW like wildfire. His name all over it.
He said the Government put a hit out on him. Claimed reliable sources (with no names) nothing tangible, no credibility to it what so ever. Just Bill writing something, usually in the third person and then sharing it to anyone and everyone stupid enough to repost it.
Looking back, these are his standard stories. Now that his .com site is hit and miss, and he lost his main FB, he is using your name .com and his twitter to blast his nonsense. (if I was you, I wouldn't feed into his sickness any more. You are just helping him promote himself, if you are sending the emails.)
He loves the drama, and I know someone has the screen shot of him saying just that. Anyone and everyone who doesn't buy his drama and stories, becomes the story. He is the only one who is allowed their first amendment rights. Do not speak the truth of what you have witnessed, or you will be hunted and sued.
He writes his own headlines (in third party) as if he is famous. LNM's headline here was spot on. Full of enablers who help him promote his lies through the WWW.
@ Anon you said "I used to think Bill was just a narcissist. Yunno, ate up with himself."
DeleteReminded me of this song. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYn8lfMEmfA
Some times, some people don't need an IP addy or a screen name to know who is posting under Anonymous. I'm pointing that out because I know who I'm responding to and I want to make it clear my intention is not to pick a fight. I just can't stand that Bill has handled this situation so poorly that he does appear to be more crazy than the accused in this case. The accused has several people on this site bamboozled and this site is about uncovering truth.
DeleteThe accused will deny every bit, as has been his MO, of what I am about to say. Nobody in this story is innocent. Or completely sane. But, in piecing together information (1st and 3rd parties all over the web) from research that was done last fall when the accused showed up on this site, and bits/pieces to date, here is the history:
The accused's father and the chick filmed were neighbors years ago. They appeared to be good neighbors at one time, then had a falling out. The father took issue with the chick's sexual orientation. The chick accused the father of lewd behavior. The accused became involved and escalated the situation. It appears the chick moved away and it all died down.
Until, one day the accused interfered with his father in law's rights under the 2nd amendment. The chick, having moved back to MT, decided to stand up for dad in law. This appears to have opened old wounds and started the war. The accused started a cyber campaign of terror against the chick. Even to the point of interfering in a suit against the chick for which he has absolutely no interest or claim (just like Bill threatening to interfere in the child custody case of friend of ours). Unfortunately for the chick, she is just as evil as the accused and has handled the situation just as badly as Bill. Regardless of what the chick has or has not done, the accused has done everything he accused of doing. Including recruitment of others to harass and terrorize the chick.
It was in pursuit of stalking the chick that the accused happened onto Bill. Bill was tempted with an offer of donation if he would provide the accused with the physical location and time of the chick's filming. And that's where the whole thing with Bill vs the accused started. Regardless of what Bill has or has not done, the accused has done everything he is accused of doing.
The accused is sending e-mails, making veiled threats, not so veiled threats, making obscene comments and lying about it. His purpose on this site appears to be recruitment of the unwitting to join his campaign of harassment. Just as he did with the chick. Between last fall and now, the accused has deleted incriminating data from the web. A lot is still out there if you care to search.
As regards the father in law, I don't think he should have a gun either. He appears to be a SovCit. He and some pals were arrested for conspiracy to kidnap a judge and a weapons violation. Charges were dropped or reduced, I don't recall which. But, the accused's efforts to stop the process didn't matter. The father in law has the right to own a gun, just like the accused. Based on the behavior of the accused, IMO he shouldn't be allowed that right either.
And Bill is a fool for stepping foot in the State of Montana.
@Ninja, ya I understand. I'm not sending him the emails, btw, somebody else is having fun, or he's sending them to himself, just like Cox used to.I have a lead on maybe who. Wouldn't surprise me if he is schitzo just like her. Or maybe its Walter.. Ignoring him pisses him off the most. He's just trying to get a legal reaction or some attention like a little child. Ssdd, kinda boring and repetitive. And all lies, as if he's going to actually come here pfffft drama equals cash to him. . Looks like he's going to have a big press confrence now.
Delete@ Ninja: excellent point
Delete"if I was you, I wouldn't feed into his sickness any more. You are just helping him promote himself"
I never sent any e-mail too him..... I do think it Cox
DeleteROFL- umm yeah, I needed that...our temperature should be below 120 today, so
ReplyDeleteHAPPY 4 of JULY my friends!
Um...ya, the picture he posted was taken ten years ago in San Diego. Day 25 of the pie tour, 2003. But? He kinda likes it, and somebody took it, like Bozzy, so he posted it.
ReplyDeleteI'm calling bs. I was probably a selfie.
ReplyDelete*It
ReplyDeleteActually, it's not a selfie. Its a ten year old picture taken in San Diego.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you've found the original, so you have conclusive, undeniable proof that someone else was holding the camera. Otherwise, I'm sure that 10 years ago in San Diego it would have been impossible for Bill to take a selfie.
ReplyDeleteI was just KIDDING. Geez. Lighten up. Not like he doesn't post selfie's all the time.
http://www.roundamerica.com/trip/journal/day25.htm
ReplyDelete"We met Allen, Bill, and Walter at the Balboa Park Visitor's Center. We had a nice chat, and when Bill (http://members.aol.com/otpadre/Welcome.htm) commented on the beads I was wearing, he asked if we had been to Mardi Gras. No, I explained that the beads were a gift from the Floating Neutrinos. Then I told them the whole story of meeting Poppa and Aurelia Neutrino (Day 18). I explained that I don't normally wear beads, but I am a little superstitious, and I figured anyone who floats on a raft from New York to Spain and lives to tell about it has some good luck going on, so I will continue to wear the beads. Bill then took off his Hawaiian Lei and gave it to me. How nice! It matched my outfit really well. My beads are green, purple, and white, and now I had a lovely purple, green, and yellow lei to wear with the beads. I did notice the stares from men became a little more shocked-looking once I added the lei. It may be a little too much color for most men. Some guys just can't wear purple."
ReplyDelete