Tuesday, September 16, 2014

National Liberty Alliance's John Darash is Exposed as John Vidurek



Poor David Schied, he just can't pick em.  After moving over to the NLA (new lawless america) as a refugee of Bill Windsor's man made disaster, now it turns out he backed another loser in John Vidurek aka John Darash.

When we last covered the NLA, they were talking about constituting each state (which amounts to finding just one person in each county to say we cool).  Well that didn't work out so well so he had to make up a new way to "take back his country"....and that was by doing a super secret (Office Depot special) state seal, one in each state.  I guess if you somehow filed court papers with little made up state seals of all 50 States that would unlock some hidden secrets our Founding Fathers put into place to guard this Nation.

Well whatever, everyone left after he missed his first "or else" deadline and they grow tired of his constantly changing goals and objectives.   Things got interesting last night on his weekly excuse show when a caller by the name of Lloyd called in and pointed out all of John's legal failures as well as his real name.  This fact had been exposed by the folks over at fogbow. The NLA has scrubbed this little part of the radio show.  So much for liberty, freedom and the truth.

Darash created a buzz early on because he appeared to be someone with almost no background....no axe to grind.  It turns out he is just like Bill and all his other sovereign citizen buddies (don't call us sovereign citizens we are citizens who are sovereign) in that he engages in his favorite from of anti-american terrorism:  paper.  Vidurek and his wife Kimberly, didn't pay their taxes and when the IRS tried to levy against them they sued the IRS and involved agents as party of a conspiracy.  You see, they don't have to pay taxes because the IRS isn't real.  Me the People have declared that null and void.  But what's really interesting here is he employs the Windsor game of name it and claim it in the lawsuit regarding conspiracy and RICO:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/239707114/S-D-N-Y-7-13-Cv-04476-38-Vidurek-v-Miller-Memorandum-Opinion

Notice on pages 12-14 talking about RICO and how you can't just go by "association in fact" and then come up with your own "conclusory naming" of your own made up RICO conspiracy.  This is a fatal blow to Bill as well since his whole RICO claim amounts to his "upon information and belief" which translates into "I have no proof whatsoever but I'm going to claim it because it helps fit my legal goals".

So not paying taxes didn't work out so well for Vidurek, so then it was on to running for political office.  He ran for Committeeman in his local jurisdiction in Hyde Park....and lost.  Again, like Bill, not one to take no for an answer and certainly not one to ever listen to the will of the actual People....Vidurek and his partner in crime Gerard Aprea come up with a crazy idea.  Lets sue the State Attorney General for not recognizing us in our made up position of Committeeman (with no specific designation or jurisdiction) and then go for default judgement and then take office of our new made up position.   http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/Decisions/2013/514491.pdf

Everything was moving along as planned until the court stopped short of giving them a default judgement for something that doesn't exist.  Brilliant plan foiled again.  It was after all this that Vidurek decided to hit the reset button and start over with his new form of paper terrorism through citizen grand juries and to get a fresh start, he needed a new name since he has much to hide from the old one.

For someone who constantly implores his followers to do the honorable thing, John Vidurek has been hiding his true identity for the purposes of deception and fraud.  Like Bill, the only way he can exist is by leeching off the backs of others who believe the lies that he feeds them.

186 comments:

  1. and speaking of Fogbow, I love their slogan "Falsehoods Unchallenged only Fester and Grow". Completely agree, I think we all have a moral duty to not just disagree with lies and frauds...but actually point them out for everyone to see. Its no different than if you just get off the road that has a major wreck and the road is shutdown....you then hear someone is planning on heading out on that very same road you should warn them of what they are going to encounter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree completely, the considerate thing to do is warn the folks heading that down that road...

      Delete
    2. Ditto. Amazing similarities between these "leaders" who don't tell the truth, yet expect everyone else to. And, when they are overly suspicious of others, it's because they are projecting their own deceptiveness. What a joke!

      Delete
    3. Everything about this article is non-sense. Show me some of your work poster. You like many others that came before you, like to shine the light on those who stand up to the gang bangers. Let me just say this, how would you like it if i told EVERYBODY, that every freaken single law out there does not apply to us. But that it applies to you, the PERSON, CORP. in the day to day operation of your businesses, and in the courtrooms, to beef up your juris-FICTION. Every law is copy-write protected meaning that when "we the people" use these laws, you ignore us as you are not operating under any constitutionality or oath of office unless i disclose your w-9, Dunns Account and Cage # and GSA account. For which the public should write up so many bills you won't know what hit you. People, the only way they have power over you, the CIVILIAN, is when you CONSENT. There are 12 presumptions of law you must rebut, so look that up and rebutt them have them pre-written up so you can send these charlatans to hell. They are using Lieber Codes, Special Admiralty, Title 50, spoils of war, and use no laws whatsoever people. They are using opinions, they call it case law, you call it common-law, but it is only the common law of their inner circle. Don't mess with me, I'll spill some more beans on your sorry behinds, i'll cream your arses in court too.

      Delete
    4. LOL. I bet. You sound super intelligent.

      Doot Dee Doo.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELeIaXLHrRo

      Delete
  2. This wackadoodle well of twits is bottomless, isn't it?
    Damn. Like Windsor wasn't enough!
    And? yeah, Ginger, it seems that Schied guy has a defective picker.
    Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, so much for all that transparency Darash/Vidurek spews. It's too bad he edited his outing from the recording. Y'all would have loved his response to Lloyd challenge that he's lost every case he's ever filed. Darash/Vidurek said he did not lose every case, some of them were thrown out of court - he didn't lose those.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awesome!

      By that logic, there are a very, very large number of undefeated litigators in the U.S.

      Delete
    2. Litigants. For better or worse, "litigators" are lawyers. (Not too many undefeated lawyers.)

      Delete
    3. Yes, I know that. I don't care about undefeated litigants. I am a litigator (and a non-undefeated one, alas). The Darash fantasy-logic that NBTDT described sounds dreamy to me, because so many members of my profession (though actually not me, as it happens) would then have vastly better win-loss records.

      Delete
    4. Well that comment made no sense. I am a lawyer and have been for over 40 years. Your first post incorrectly used the word "litigator" and your second post is a non sequitor and an attempt to cover the error in your first.

      Since this is the Internet pardon me if I don't believe a word you posted. Because I don't.

      Delete
    5. Well that comment made no sense.

      Exactly which part did you not understand?

      I am a lawyer and have been for over 40 years.

      Which is relevant how? I am a lawyer and have been for over 10 years. Moreover, I have posted a large number of comments--several of them containing detailed legal analysis--on this very weblog. What corner did you just crawl out of?

      Your first post incorrectly used the word "litigator"....

      No, in fact, it did not. In that comment I noted that, by the standard that "Darash" (according to NBTDT) provided, there exist a very large number of undefeated litigators in the United States--a large number of attorneys who could claim to have lost zero cases, once we eliminate all of the cases they've filed only to have them thrown out of court. There is nothing the slightest bit dubious about that usage of the word "litigators."

      You then jumped in out of nowhere and declared that the proper word was "litigants." But I wasn't discussing litigants--I was discussing lawyers. Such as myself. (Why in the world an alleged lawyer would even be interested in the concept of an "undefeated" litigant I have no idea. Who gives a rip about individual litigants' win-loss records? That's silly, and it has nothing to do with what I was actually writing about in my initial comment.)

      ...and your second post is a non sequitor....

      A "non sequitor"?! Excuse me? You accuse me of confusing "litigator" with "litigant"--and then demonstrate that you don't know how to spell a simple Latin term? You cannot be serious.

      There was nothing wrong with my initial comment. My second comment, which explained why your criticism was flatly wrong, was in fact not a non sequitur. You simply have no idea what you're talking about. Counselor.

      Delete
    6. And, IMHO - if a litigant/litigator files a complaint that gets "kicked out" of court or dismissed, it generally means s/he didn't have or weren't able to make the case. Counts as a loss, swing and a miss.

      And those that might disagree with me take note: the point really is that there is guy collecting money for teaching people how to solve their Billbutthurtness* issues with legal methods and theories that have ZERO success.

      *(c) Anon, but can't remember which one.

      Delete
    7. See there...Steven Wright's quip is true: 98% of all attorneys make the others look bad.

      Delete
    8. NBTDT:
      Counts as a loss, swing and a miss.

      Oh, absolutely. "Darash"'s notions to the contrary are novel and funny, which is why I opened my initial comment last night with "Awesome!"

      (Thinking about it today, I realized that I've never lost a case in that particular way, so the Darash Method of counting wins and losses wouldn't do my record any good. And I have lost cases in other ways, alas. It was always because of a massive judicial conspiracy against me, of course.)

      Anon 8:29:
      See there...Steven Wright's quip is true: 98% of all attorneys make the others look bad.

      Cute. That might be a "non sequitor," though.

      Delete
    9. You Sir, are our beloved Attorney,and a gentleman and a scholar and among the top 2% (IMO).

      Delete
    10. Dear Gawd! @Attorney (ours) is sooooooo H O T for certain NBTDT!
      *faints* bats lashes first*

      Delete
    11. I, ℗, had first dibs. Take your lashes & back off>>>>>

      Hi @Attorney! Waving!

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
  4. Did a web search, yep another courthouse gadfly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Darash/Vidurek has more practice at rebel rousing than I thought. He was campaigning for Ron Paul in 2007 when he went off on this rant:

    http://www.rushlimbaughforum.com/think-the-war-terror-fraud-t129.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL "Wake up America...." I am going to lead you into a jail cell if you follow me. Although I won't be sitting there with you....I'll just point you in the misdirection of thinking Citizen Grand Juries are legal, have weight, and can "take our country back."

      Just like the innocent *insert eye roll* grandpa who's a Grand Jury professional. Do what I say, not what I do. How'd that work out for Paulson. hahahaha

      Delete
    2. Wow, you weren't kidding NB about the rebel rousing. I've been checking out all kinds of links and stories on Vidurek. Why in the world this clown thought he would succeed at leading a mass of people into the land of the lost Citizens Grand Juries is beyond me. Talk about swing and a miss. Holy crap!

      Now he and Windsor are in the same going no where collecting donations along the way category in my book. Just WOW!

      Delete
    3. ***book coming soon to Amazon, Barns and Nobel, Boarders and all the other places Windsor's "Round America" Book are located. ***

      Delete
    4. Many years ago, on Howard Stern, he had a KKK member on weekly, his rant always started with "Wake UP America!"

      Delete
  6. Is it Friday the 19th, yet?

    #anticipation

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, two whole weeks today without any word from his "high-ness". Im betting he's just getting ready for his ass slapping tomorrow.
    Have fun Texas, if you have judges stoopid enough to allow it, you deserve both of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sniff, sniff....smells like Booshie up in here ^^^. And just think, Bill would not be harassing anyone in TX if it weren't for stoopid people in other states, say like in Montana, that harassed him first.

      Delete
    2. NBTDT, Windsor positioned himself as a "Public Figure." So what if someone said some things about him that he didn't like. I don't think Windsor is a pedophile, but some other things said about him are true, like that he's vexatious. Windsor should have moved on and ignored crap, but instead wants to sue everybody and his brother/sister as a nuisance to intimidate. Filing for sanctions at this point in the Ellis County Case? Pleeeeease

      Delete
    3. So what if Bill is a "public figure", he does and says things somebody doesn't like? Do you think he deserved to be harassed and tormented with nasty e-mails and FB notes?

      Delete
    4. I wonder if Bill will ever grasp the irony of him going into court and saying "judge, all these people need sanctions for not following the proper legal procedures that were clearly spelled out"

      Delete
    5. Probably not. But at least it will provide some face palming giggles for the rest of us.

      Delete
    6. How about the irony of NB calling Windsor a cyber-bully?

      Delete
    7. No one deserves to be harassed, but public figures get that all the time and very few of them react by donning a bulletproof vest and going to the locality of suspects. Bill Windsor is the only one I know of who has done anything like that.

      Delete
    8. GS, the man can crank out voluminous pleadings to the court that may or may not meet format requirements (probably mostly not), but if he reads and understands court rules, he's not observing them. He may be a few bricks short of a load or he thinks he's exempted, in my opinion.

      Delete
    9. @ 2:15 Agreed. But I can't see any reason to tolerate taunting by one of the people responsible for Bill not walking away from it.

      @ 2:13 - the irony of a cyber bully calling me one, is not lost on anyone with good sense.

      Delete
    10. NB - The only one responsible for Bill not walking away is Bill. If he was so afraid, why did he put himself in the way of Boushie and creating enormous drama? Bill could have been mad and maybe even file an action against Boushie, but really? What played out made him look over-the-top crazy and ultimately Boushie came out okay. IMO.

      Delete
    11. I'm sorry, I'm just past the point of arguing with anyone that can't get a grip on what Booshie did.

      Delete
    12. Which is nothing.

      Delete
    13. Right. With that you have identified yourself as a Windsor ex lemming. Only they believe in fairy tales...

      Delete
    14. You should know, you are the Windsor spy.

      Delete
    15. ^^^^ What a dumb ass.

      Delete
    16. Or, 8:41 could be Booshie, the fairy tale maker himself, since it's clear now he's been lurking.

      Delete
    17. He must have some free time between sets of beakers to wash. You'd think he'd be able to find something to scrub, or a glory hole to kneel in to kill some time.

      Delete
  8. Billy's been quite busy filing motions for sanctions against the defendants in the Ellis Co. action. No matter what happens tomorrow, I refuse to allow Windsor, Carroll, Texas or any other person or state to "rock my boat" or diminish my bliss.
    Carroll may very well be foolish enough to allow Windsor to proceed with his foolishness, but I am convinced and resolved Windsor will not, in the end, prevail.


    http://petereidlaw.com/2012/09/memorandum-on-the-texas-citizens-participation-act-the-texas-anti-slapp-statute/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahhh, Good idea not to let Windsor diminish bliss. Bill has been engaged in pre-emptive strikes for no reason again. He certainly deserves substantial money sanctions etc. in the Windsor v. Facebook case.

      Delete
    2. Can't wait for tomorrow, he's hoping for a "burp" in one of these suits, since even a blind pig occasionally finds an ear of corn.

      Delete
    3. He was the blind pig for sure! & flat out lied to the Judge several times! Point blank lied.

      Delete
  9. I imagine it would be a monumental task, but it would be most interesting to see some (or, dare I wish, all) of the Ellis County case filings posted somewhere so that the public can read them.

    Of course, perhaps some of the defendants would prefer the filings not be made public, which would be perfectly understandable.

    Either way: I hope the hearing goes well tomorrow. Good luck, Joeys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is interesting that Windsor hasn't posted them on one of his many "hate" sites, or his .com or his blog. He did with the other cases. I have to think the reason he's not sharing with his lemmings is because they are so over the top insane--even for Windsor--he doesn't want the lemmings to know what he's told them, isn't the truth.

      If he posted the court documents, it just might prove that he is a liar once and for all, and what he's doing is harassment plain and simple. Not to mention, he's not following proper court procedure, he's ignoring motions filed by the defendants, asking for sanctions left and right--which the motions he's ignoring were to either stay, quash or stop much of his demands until the motions to dismiss have been heard. He's blown his own time frames to respond from what I have read as well. He has completely disregarded the stay, which altered his time frames as well, but it's one way Windsor so I guess there is no surprise there.

      Delete
    2. See—that's some exciting, entertaining litigation action. Wish I could read it.

      Delete
    3. Bill didn't have a happy day today, @Attorney. It was so awesome. It made me blissful~ I wish you'd been there! You'd have giggled several times. I certainly did.

      KMc

      Delete
    4. I'm waiting with bated breath for a meticulously detailed report!

      Delete
    5. Well, shitfire, where to begin?
      Windsor is still a doofus, wearing same court uniform made famous in Missouri.
      He is a rat fink tattle tale to bailiff thinking I was taking his photo in courtroom... duh...video game! I waited until public area where there is no expectation of privacy, unlike his sorry ass does, using telescopic lens to stalk his victims/defendants.
      Uh, lemme see, Windsor didn't have any of the documents the judge requested, but still drug his wheelie cart across antique wood floors like it made a shit...
      I might be biased, @Attorney...Of the 200+ things he's filed in this lawsuit? I have a difficult time focusing on just one of the multi-hundred page copy & paste BillShit things.
      I feel as though come October 28th? That hearing will be a make or break it day.
      Today seemed to be a "get a game plan/time frame" kinda opportunity that the judge gave him. I thought he failed miserably, but I am VERY biased.
      Windsor is very adamant that he is NOT a public figure or semi public figure and has never been! He's also convinced that only several hundred think he is a teetotaling idiot and not actually thousands! He's just gonna take out his vengeance on these few defendants though.
      The judge asked Windsor, as he patted one 12+ inch high BillShit stack of three that has been filed "IF there was any possible way to work this out?" Windsor immediately guffawed and stated only if these ProSe defendants and the other defendants write huge checks to me and make the 40,000+ comments disappear"
      So? There you have my view in a nutshell.
      He loves to play court and wants money. It's never occurred to Windsor that perhaps thousands of individuals think he is an assrag that abuse courts and harasses people at random/"upon information and belief", nope, just the ones he chooses.
      Oh! and he's Hellbent on forcing Google & Facebook back into his vexi Texas game. ( I hope I get to see GoogleGirl Shannon! She is a rockstar!) The judge mentioned that he'd already ruled a big no on Google, but Windsor didn't seem to pay much mind to that...
      Oh! and his shaking is much worse. Much. Or he was just really really nervous being stuck so close to us ProSe-ers:) He fails to make eye contact either. Lots of gazing off to the right as he speaks or looks down.
      The outright lies he told the judge about Boushie? & how he had followed the court's procedures to serve him & how Boushie had not ever responded? I seriously thought God was gonna strike him down right there. Even my kid sitting in gallery blinked a lot at that doozy.
      I'll get a chronological order of how it all went down & report back?
      You mull it over, ok? I'll be around...Kemp, Texas.

      KMc


      There's more, but...I'm still replaying the day over in my mind.
      The ProSe defendants and Windsor were admonished to seek attorneys. You wanna? Mull it over, it is a unique clusterferbuffle for certain, that's just what Windsor has filed!
      #damn
      #treeslayer

      KMc

      Delete
    6. Captivating KMc. Thanks and looking forward to more!

      Delete
    7. I'll havta recover from #swooning
      It's just the little nuances that caught my attention.
      Windsor did keep referring to "we". The one and only time he did respond to me? Was when I asked him "we? who is we?' and he said "well, me!" Ummmm hmmmmmm #we #me
      sniff sniff, yeah sure Vexi, sure.

      I'll compose self by daylight~ *bats lashes*

      KMc

      Delete
    8. Thank you for the report, KMc!

      Delete
    9. There was other funny stuff~ just can't share it ALL here~
      Same batshit crazy old geezer shizzle~

      Delete
    10. Yes, thank you, KMc. Sounds like October 28 will be a big day in Windsorland.

      Anyone else want to give a play-by-play account of Friday's showdown?

      Delete
    11. Oh, wait, you mean me(!):
      The ProSe defendants and Windsor were admonished to seek attorneys. You wanna?

      No, thanks. I've gone up against my share of wacky pro ses--though none who have been quite as enraged, persistent, or single-minded as Windsor. Dealing with the blizzard of paper he files in every case is not my idea of fun.

      I have lots of respect for the attorneys and others who are taking him on, though. Good on you.

      Delete
    12. "I have lots of respect for the attorneys and others who are taking him on, though."

      Me too. Where I don't have any respect, at all, is for the people named and properly served that have hollered for a year "we must stop Bill", then give absolutely nothing to Judge Carroll to work with in that effort.

      Delete
    13. Snap dammit, @Attorney! I had hoped you'd dive right off into the big Texas #Vexiness.
      Taking on a client in this mess would totally run off an attorney's staff! Heck, just the individual that has to gather & tote the mail could easily suffer irreparable damage to their back! Then? The wading through the passels of Motions, 1st Amended, 2nd Amended, Amended Amended 2nd and 3rds! Windsor's biographies that deems are his affidavits are EPIC!
      My kids and a coupla of my friends were looking thru the bushels of paper he has sent (& obviously there's far more he didn't) and we got so tickled, we were just laughing hysterically! My youngest kid is convinced without a doubt, that ANYONE that isn't attempting to cure some horrific disease & taking notes re: that? Really is just #SlapDabEatUpWithDoofitis to generate the sheer volumes of paper/documents :) Even 12 year olds can plainly see how warped Windsor is with 'litigating'! It's his entire life & he relishes every second of it!
      We just chose random documents outta the boxes last night to read over. One was similar to what the Judge read aloud, the one that Windsor lists all the things he is NOT. (as the Judge read a few aloud? Even he questioned "You wrote that you are NOT these? Why?") I would have never known any of those may have been published/posted IF Windsor himself had not repeatedly included them among the Court docs, posted them on his .coms, or blasted them on his FakeBook pages! Both of my kids believe Windsor fabricated a lot of those, just for the #WowFactor! Now? I am wondering, too! Why would anyone keep repeating some of the cruder, absolutely gross ones? Just so the just can repeat them in open court? The judge stopped after about 7 or 8, just too goofy & absurd to utter and horrible uncomfortable to hear!
      Reading the entire looooooong list last night? Had teenagers and adults gasping, blinking uncontrollably! And there are reams and reams more of this type of snit? Gag!
      The consensus here was it was a pitiful existence he's chosen to focus on, whether it was ever really published by anyone, anywhere, other than Windsor himself.... And that Windsor seems to snatch names of individuals randomly #UponInformationAndBelief and file lawsuits repeatedly using the same content, just changing the defendant(s) and venues!

      #totalabsurdity
      #absolutelyfrivilous
      #EvenAdolescentsAreAstounded
      #TreeSlayer
      #LifeWaster

      #SemperFiFamily
      KMc

      Delete
  10. I'm dying to read the filings from people that never heard of Bill until he sued them. I read some of Bill's filings - no surprise there, same song/dance as all the other cases.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I would love to laugh reading them too NBTDT,

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The folks at Quatloos are discussing Bill and the TX case.

    http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=7690&start=40

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I looooooove them! Especially the #pirateAlpaca!

      ♛

      Delete
    2. YO! Quatloos People - if you are reading over here: I agree with this comment. However, aside from the fact that Windsor seems unable to bring forward any rational complaint, those instances of behavior beyond the pale were exhibited by people that don't live in Texas.

      "t's more screed than suitable complaint, apparently drafted in an attempt to impress the public with voluminous detail more than to pursue a substantive case. Having said that, if some of the allegations could be brought forward in a more rational complaint (and I wonder what has transpired since the filing) there seem to be instances of behavior on the part of some of the defendants that if true, would be beyond the pale."

      Delete
    3. Quoted from whom?

      Delete
    4. Just because this person seems quasi-intelligent doesn't make it so.

      Delete
    5. Comment is in the link I posted at 8:40:


      Re: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al

      Postby Judge Roy Bean » Wed Sep 17, 2014 3:29 am

      Delete
    6. I'm gonna havta go back over to Quantaloos, now.
      What 'behavior"?
      Do they know at Quantaloos that not only is Windsor a Vexi menace, but actually does physical stalking?
      Perhaps I am reading this incorrectly or out of context? What behavior?
      #specific

      Delete
    7. Read Quatioos and then you can sue them too, Bill. Windsor v. Quatioosies.

      Delete
    8. yeah, y'all might like this comment better. Looks actionable to me, per Bill's standards.


      Re: William M. Windsor v. Fulton County et al

      Postby notorial dissent » Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:56 pm
      Windsor was borderline crazy, and very nasty when he first started filing these lawsuits in GA, and it would appear that he has gotten far worse with time. All things considered, I think it is time for Mr Windsor to face a competency hearing as I think he has ceased to be competent to deal with himself, life, or much of anything else, let alone court filings. At the very least he is paranoid and delusional.

      Delete
    9. Judge Bean is obviously too old to have read (and understood) a half dozen or so of the prevailing cases on the subjects of defamation and public figures, etc.

      -----------------------------------------------------------
      New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 270 (1964)

      Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 162 (1967)

      Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970)

      Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc 418 U.S. 323 (1974)

      Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 US 46 - 1988

      Spence v. Flynt 112 S. Ct. 1668 (1992).

      Delete
    10. Yeah, is Windsor insane enough to go after Quatloos? It would be a mistake to do so, IMO.

      Quatloos.com
      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Quatloos.com is an anti-fraud website maintained by a non-profit corporation, Financial and Tax Fraud Education Associates, Inc. It was founded in 2000 by Jay David Adkisson, an attorney and stockbroker. The site contains examples of advanced fee scams, such as the 419 Scam; information on misleading anti-tax and investment scams (including the sovereign citizen movement); examples of fraudulent documents; and a large number of court decisions. Although light-hearted in tone (its basic structure is a museum with a Hall of Shame at the back) it is a serious resource in the area. It also contains links to various law enforcement agencies that specialize in investigating such scams. It was listed as one of PC Magazines top 100 undiscovered web sites in 2003[1] and has been recommended as a good place to learn about internet scams and related fraud.[2] Forbes selected it as one of its "Best of the Web" sites in 2000.[3]

      Delete
    11. to be fair, I think that poster over there was only commenting after reading Bill's original petition. They were not weighing in on the public figure status or if what bill was claiming is true. Bill used lies like saying people called him a pedophile, had sex with animals ext...to get his foot in the door. Of course they are lies, but if true, they would be "beyond the pale". I think that's all that poster was pointing out.

      Delete
    12. Judge Bean's comment was not relative to protected speech. I doubt very seriously that Windsor will attempt to sue Quatloos. His method of handling their criticism was to post a dissertation about how wrong they are - then he ignored them.

      Delete
    13. Have you read the Falwell v. Flynt case? In a nutshell, Flynt published a Hustler cover which implied Falwell had sex with his mom in an outhouse. Yes, it was "beyond the pale" if you mean it was in very bad taste, but guess what? SCOTUS voted unanimously to reverse a lower court which had awarded Falwell damages. SCOTUS said public figures couldn't recover for IIEM when the publication is parody (a type of protected speech).

      Delete
    14. Sorry, Judge Bean's comment is not relative to bad taste either.

      Delete
    15. To make sure we're on the same page, the quote at issue is:

      "there seem to be instances of behavior on the part of some of the defendants that if true, would be beyond the pale."

      What EXACT behaviors do you think Bean meant which were "beyond the pale?"

      Delete
    16. Do you REALLY want me to help Bill bring forward a more rational complaint?

      If you are satisfied that your behavior is not actionable, then that comment is not relative to you either.

      Delete
    17. Seriously? You think Billy's going to read this blog and find your
      post and declare, "Ah ha! NB just gave me the perfect argument!"

      Delete
    18. Seriously? No, I don't think Bill has ever read a gosh darn comment from this blog that somebody didn't put right in front of his face. But somebody is helping Bill amend his pleadings with information taken from this blog.

      Delete
    19. actually anon 12:01 is clueless on whats going on, cause that it's self has been mentioned in Bill's proceeding

      Delete
    20. 12:01 is clueless how? In the same way 1:40 is clueless about the proper use of the apostrophe. (whats --> what's, cause--> 'cause , it's --> its)? Stick to that then.

      Delete
    21. @ 1:40 - I suspect that clueless @ 12:01 and grammar cop @ 8:32 is Bill's little amended plea helper. Just another vexi litigation LOSER.

      Delete
    22. I suspect NB, who pretends she's omniscient and omnipresent, is EXACTLY like WINDSOR in her amazing proclivity to dictate HER politics on everyone else. Also, she LOVES to accuse others on the one hand, and on the other REFUSE to provide evidence for her accusation. It's all about HER way or the HIGHWAY, you know; she dictates the terms--not you. Remind you of anyone? NB wants us to think Billy's taking the advice of someone else. Sure. Why not. Pigs fly don't they? I now know why NB chose a steer for a moniker--it's the universal sign for BS.

      Delete
    23. Feel better now?

      You aren't any different than any other bully that can't stand it when someone won't play your game.

      Delete
    24. And how do you know my moniker is a steer from looking at the front end? The fact that you draw conclusions without looking in the right place for facts sort of tells me the rest of everything I need to know about you.

      Delete
    25. Do I feel better now? Not really, but I will let others decide who is and who isn't the bully and BSer around these parts.

      Huh...that's the retort you came up with--that it's impossible to tell your moniker is a steer from the front end and the smell of your BS in the air?

      Oh...I get it now...you're suggesting your moniker is a minotaur--ya...go with that. I guess that makes perfect sense in your fantasy world, but again, I'll let others judge the matter for themselves.

      Delete
    26. http://www.wikihow.com/Tell-the-Difference-Between-Bulls,-Cows,-Steers-and-Heifers

      Delete
    27. Awww, SnoozaLou is baaaaack!
      Windsor didn't get very far yesterday with your expert whispers in his ear. Imagine that! One blind loser leading another.
      Continue on, you're both doing excellent!

      #weWindsorReferredTo
      #ThereIsNoWeOnlyHe

      Delete
    28. Sorry to burst your little bubble, 11:38, but I'm not Snoozan. As for steers and queers and all of that, I guess NB's claiming she's a heifer--a young cow--like her moniker. Fine. Where I come from, there's just not that much difference between a heifer and a steer--neither one has balls--yet they both emit a lot of BS.

      Delete
    29. LMAO. So, again - how do you know that critter and I have no balls? The only thing I've claimed is that you have drawn conclusions and made judgements without the slightest concern that you don't have all the facts.

      Well, whatever where you came from does or doesn't know about cattle - they sure know how to raise a great bully.

      OK, now you can have the last word. I'm out.

      Delete
    30. "The only thing I've claimed is that you have drawn conclusions and made judgements without the slightest concern that you don't have all the facts. "

      Right back at ya! That's my EXACT point about you! Even GS tried to make that point last night about the "beyond the pale" issue, but what did you do? Well, you accused me of helping Bill! In point of fact, I've done NOTHING--N-O-T-H-I-N-G but try to help others who are stuck in Billy's quagmire. I don't give a damn whether you believe that or not.

      Delete
    31. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    32. Oh thank God somebody is going to own their comments. I don't have a flipping clue who posted after 8:56. Doesn't matter as regards my response to the personal attack. My comments at 8:56 were directed at the snarly ugly remarks posted before that. And, yes I do think it was you, Snoozan. I suspect you are helping Bill, for a whole lot of reasons I have no intention of expounding on here or now. Lacking any proof what so ever that you have been any more successful with your legal spew than Bill has been in a court room, you are IMO a litigation loser.

      Delete
    33. 1) "OK, now you can have the last word. I'm out. "

      Your long-winded 3:12 post belies this claim, but that's typical.
      Where have we seen this "second bite at the apple" behavior before?
      Oh ya...Windsor's appeal a month or so after signing the MoM agreement.

      2) "You have a hidden agenda, anyone that trusts you for "help" was probably stupid enough to trust Windsor first."
      That's just laughable; you claim I have a hidden agenda when you spend hours and hours on this blog pitching your own POLITICAL AGENDA here.
      Also, you obviously have never been a victim of a violent crime, yet just like Windsor, you wrap yourself around victim hood.


      3) Here's your post from a year ago:
      nothingbettertodotodayNovember 15, 2013 at 1:31 PM

      @ Ninja & Bob: Ditto. All of the followers make a claim of corruption. If Bill tripped over a true case of "they done me wrong", I didn't find it. In the cases I read, the complaints went beyond a failure of the litigant to accept he/she was wrong. There was a failure to see how he/she caused the problem in the first place.

      You claim I jump to conclusions without facts, yet you claim you did research and because you didn't did find anything you concluded ALL of the LA cases were bogus, but that statement is false, and I can produce affidavits to that fact. On the other hand, and by your own standard, your false claim makes you libel to Windsor, right?

      4) You claim you're superior in intellect to everyone who was duped by Windsor. I have suggested to you in the past this was a hindsight bias on your part, but you rejected it. Let's say you have been in an accident and your leg is nearly severed and you're bleeding badly. You make your way to the hospital. Now, what you seem to be claiming is you're so bright you would vet the doctors before you allowed them to work on you. The fact is, Windsor exploited victims who were already bleeding badly and looking for immediate attention--they didn't bother vetting him because he looked and sounded legit, but he changed. How can I prove he changed? Take a gander at your own post:

      nothingbettertodotodayApril 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM

      In fairness: late in 2011 & early 2012, Bill was all about ambushing and sneaking into legitimate Grand Juries. If you listen to the Talkshoes in chronological order, you can follow the shift in his opinion and rhetoric that Citizens (or common law) Grand Juries are the way to go. By the end of 2012, Bill was all in on the CLGJ idea. Seems Bill wants to forget about an entire year of statements and ideas he published.

      5) One last point. I'd really like to know what possible meaning you're ascribing the "beyond the pale" statement. You say it's too secret to discuss lest Windsor get wind of it and changes his suit. I find that reason bizarre, because after all, Windsor spent $1.5 Million on attorneys in the MoM case and he lost. See, it's not about the argument, it's about being on the wrong side of the law, and IMO, Windsor is on the wrong side in the Ellis Co. case.



      Delete
    34. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    35. SnoozaLou's little snipe got removed quickly, it wasn't the Anon volleying above that I, 11:38 was referring to, just clear that up~

      #cleanupcrewisquick

      Delete
    36. It may have been my mistake. I thought Snoozan made the comments at 12:01 and 8:32 and it appears 11:38 picked up on my error at 8:56.

      Delete
    37. To all of the non-former LA members: I'm sorry for losing my temper. After nearly two years, I should not have been surprised by such an attack.

      Delete
    38. Two years of what/whom?

      Delete
    39. Harassment from ex Windsor followers.

      Delete
    40. I didn't realize it had been that long!

      Delete
  14. NBTDT check out the Bob Hurt guy who was invited by Bill Windsor himself to join him in his coalition. I call that extreme.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Yeah, I agree Bob Hurt is extreme. I studied up on him last year. Although, he did make me chuckle: Trish Krause was looking for help when David Schied was arrested in court, Hurt got the memo. Hurt saw through the bs enough to deduce (it seems correctly so) that Schied's arrest might have been a result of him deliberately antagonizing the Judge.

      I noticed the other day that people looking at Bill's LinkedIn page have also viewed Bob Hurt's profile. Thank goodness Hurt's good sense, or more likely his ego, kept him from joining up with Bill. If all the wackadoddles could play nice together, we might all be in deep do-do.

      http://www.linkedin.com/in/williammichaelwindsor

      https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/lawmen/jkbH_CP6pss/wHzPOayta04J

      Delete
    2. This Bob Hurt? This one did join up with Windsor--enough to make a little video testimony for Congress.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iexb4bCGJb4

      Delete
    3. Oh yeah, thank you. I had forgotten about that. All I could think about was him busting Schied.

      Delete
    4. So if I have one common interest with a person and decide to work with them in pursuit of that common interest, it necessarily means I support EVERYTHING they stand for right? Brilliant.

      Delete
    5. Are you missing the point to be argumentative or are you really that dense?

      Delete
    6. @11:38 Anon. It's Bill himself. In jest.

      Delete
    7. NB,

      Here's my last word in the form of a quote:

      To give truth to him who loves it not is but to give him more plentiful material for misinterpretation.

      ~George MacDonald

      Delete
    8. The only two days the fish are sure to be biting is yesterday and tomorrow-Blackie Sherrod

      Delete
    9. “The thing is, it's very dangerous to have a fixed idea. A person with a fixed idea will always find some way of convincing himself in the end that he is right”

      ― Atle Selberg

      Delete
    10. OK smarty pants. I'm sure the people that supported Hitler felt the same way as you. It seems that the only one with a fixed idea in this is you. If you were so sure any part of a Sovcit platform was viable, what I think about it wouldn't matter.

      Delete
  15. A statement to Bill Windsor from Albert Fiorini:

    "William, In response to your request to cease and desist, as soon as I find something libelous, slanderous or defamatory to cease and desist from I will let you know. The most important defense for an action of defamation is "truth". Truth is an absolute defense to an action of defamation.

    Another important defense against defamation is "opinion". If a person makes the statement as an opinion as opposed to a fact, the statement may not support the cause of action for defamation.

    And as you hold yourself out as a "public figure" under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 case, New York Times v. Sullivan, where a public figure brings a suit for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice".

    A defense similar to opinion is "fair comment on a matter of public interest". . . . .

    A person can also become a "limited public figure" by engaging in activities which generate publicity within a narrow area of interest. . . .

    I would strongly advise you to cease and desist and stay far but out of my way. Albert J. Fiorini"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In other words, the only way you are liable for defamation against BW is if you made a false, statement of fact, on a subject other than which he is deemed a limited public figure OR if you made any false statement of fact maliciously.

      Delete
    2. Exactly on point in all categories. Well done!!!

      Delete
    3. I agree with Ginger. Very well done.

      Delete
    4. Definition of "blog": a Web site on which someone writes about personal opinions, activities, and experiences.

      Delete
  16. I am going to be ordering Lawless America Association's IRS form 990 T from the IRS since it is not published by them as it should be per IRS rules. Lawless America Association formed as a 501c3 and Its EIN is a 501c3. Meaning it has to fill out a 990-T I will have this soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And when you get it, what are you going to do with it?? Sounds pretty worthless to me.

      Delete
    2. I'm betting there is no 990-T. I may be wrong, but I believe that the only penalty for non compliance is that the organization loses it's tax exempt status. And what will you do with it? As you are neither an IRS agent, a contributor or law enforcement, I agree with 6:56, it sounds like a worthless effort.

      Delete
    3. I'd say it might be a pretty nice piece of evidence that Windsor is possibly committing fraud with the IRS with his conflicting 501 C3 status/PAC status. He has both listed, so which is it?

      Does this help his Credibility? Or his Precious Reputation? Where is the transparency the IRS states that 501C3 must have?
      Can't hurt getting it or being denied. Both are telling.

      Delete
    4. I guess I'm just not seeing the value there? I keep thinking so what?

      Delete
    5. Well I think that's why exempt status is lost, no transparency. But, otherwise you make good points.

      Delete
    6. You keep thinking "so what?"
      Well then I guess you like bending over for Windsor?

      Kind of tired of the box thinkers who can't understand the simple concept that Windsor's claims are that he "isn't a fraud, or a con..." but when someone offers up something that might help prove that his claim is untrue? It's annoying!

      Delete
    7. I will keep thinking so what. Just like I thought it about all the 1st comm bankruptcy crap. What good did all that research do?

      Delete
    8. And how is thinking you're wasting your time bending over for windsor?

      Delete
    9. Damn! "Well then I guess you like bending over for Windsor?"
      What a Shitass remark, just because some don't see the point or have questions.
      Flemming seems to have plenty of time and vast resources at his disposal to dig around, his attorney, paid for by his home owner's policy, does all the heavy lifting.
      Go for it Flemming. Just don't get pissy because everyone else is busy working or doesn't want to devote the majority of each of their days to unraveling all of Windsor's lies, half-truths, and asset hidings as their hobby.
      It sure seems recently that many have the Windsor mindset, "agree with me or you're just wrong!" and then the shit slinging begins.
      Windsor's bad enough on his own, why would so many that can agree on that, turn on each other?
      Gesh.

      Delete
    10. NBTDT, So you see nothing wrong with corporations who set themselves up as one thing such as a non-profit and operate as a political organization? It does matter and I would hope that the IRS does do something sometime. Everyone who gives to this group or others and other advocacy groups taunting the words "non-profit" should check for their status all the time. I see more and more advocates saying they are when they are not just for enticing donations. It is those people who are not working and wanting money.

      Delete
    11. Go for it Sean. Anyone who makes promises to help court victims who doesn't follow through deserves the wrath of the IRS.

      Delete
    12. No, it wasn't a shitass remark. Those who are jumping down someone's throat, making snarky comments just because someone had a thought that you didn't like--those are the shitass remarks. Is it that hard to just be nice? And if you don't agree, just keep scrolling--but no, you have to put them down.

      It's turned into nothing but a snarky, attack fest over here. Peace out.

      Delete
    13. Sean - yes, it is very wrong. I have an opinion about it but otherwise it's just none of my business. I'm not the donor's parent and I'm not the 501c3 police.

      Delete
    14. Well, guess what NBTDT i am being sued by one. Even though that the name on the lawsuit is Bill Windsor, he is asking for damages to his movie production business. He has publicly noted that his business was Lawless America Association a 501c3 that is making the movie. He is suing on behalf of the corporation but has not disclosed the name of it. It does matter to at least 15 people in this instance to wether or not the 501c3 is legit and who the Directors. I already know Barbara Windsor was the Director when it was formed. Per the divorce which is a legal affidavit she stated she was not the director. If she was not the Director then Windsor put her name there without her consent and the company was formed fraudulently. This means quite a bit.

      Delete
  17. Back on topic: Here's an interesting post from NLA's site. The first part has ring of familiarity. Do none of these people get it that it's not against any law in the US to read what's posted publicly?

    And for the Anon that thinks I have a "political agenda": the only agenda I have is to speak up against the terrorism, yes - terrorism. This comment reeks of it. Last time I looked we still vote for change, it is not made by force of threat or violence.


    Restoring the lawful common law grand juries in California

    If you are a government agent or other party wishing to block or damage NLA's efforts in this matter, do not read this post...leave this forum now...stay out of our way...or we will hunt you down and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law.

    Email your (1) State, (2) First Name, (3) email address, (4) phone number: to Califonia Dave at mcdavecc@aol.com without delay to join the private NLA training (currently underway) to bring back the common law grand juries to California.......details below:

    Mark your calendar to join us on the next NLA California state call on Wednesday September 24th at 8 pm PST...605-562-3140 pin 542173.

    Greetings from California Dave...your humble servant leader and temporary interim State Coordinator for NLA California.

    NLA now invites you, if you have not already done so, to begin the process of awareness, commitment, training towards actually bringing the common law juries back into California.

    Private NLA training and preparation is now underway to establish teams of 4-6 Administrators in each county of California and the other 49 united States.

    We need people who want to step up and be part of the first generation of Administrators...temporary or long term. The Administrators are the people who will actually be moving (while escorted by armed public servants) into the courthouses to take back lawful control of the juries from the corrupt judges and DA's.

    Email your (1) State, (2) First Name, (3) email address, (4) phone number: to Califonia Dave at mcdavecc@aol.com without delay to join the private NLA training (currently underway) to bring back the common law grand juries to California.

    All my respects,

    California Dave

    ReplyDelete
  18. for Sean, He is suing me because Bill Windsor said I own a company that Bill Windsor put a hold on that company name in KS.... I would not worry because you have a good lawyer, I just read the 1000 things he want you to said you did..... I love the one's about his ex's wife..... the best one is about putting every thing in her name without her Knowledge.... "You need to admit how that is not wrong"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are saying that he is admits to putting her name on as a director without her knowledge? Wow what a dummy.

      Delete
  19. Trust me, Barbara has been aware of his escapades for a long time, IMO, she chooses to play dumb.

    Though not the schemer Bill is, she always seems to be in the background in one capacity or another. And frankly, whatever her part in this most recent exploit, to be married to someone like that, living in beautiful homes and reaping the benefits of his dealings for decades, leaves me with absolutley no sympathy for her or Ryan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...she always seems to be in the background in one capacity or another."

      That is exactly what was expected of a good southern woman/wife of her generation.

      Delete
    2. If Bill really wanted to find Curtis I can confirm that he is at his dads address in Midlothian this very evening. Sitting in his truck!
      I just passed by and saw him sitting there drinking his typical pint! What a dumb ass

      Delete
  20. Texas Rules of Evidence as of September 1, 2014: http://www.courts.state.tx.us/rules/tre/tre-all-010107.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And so, what was the point in posting the criminal rules of evidence?

      Delete
    2. Civil and criminal rules of evidence.

      Delete
  21. As of today windsor has not told the courts "Windsor can not specify which defamatory and threats (threats?) were published by whom until discovery is done"

    Interesting enough he know already whose names said what. What he doesn't know is the real names of those people who he claims are the people using those names. For all we know petunia could be loryn Ryder or oceans could be claidine under another name. Interesting. All I know is that I personally attend the church of Scientology only because I have been programmed via ultra MK to go there weekly and I am also a member of the masons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me too!!! And sometimes? I'm a Mike!

      Delete
    2. Too funny. And good point. Maybe I'm Petunia's alter ego. If I recall correctly Snoozan used to think I posted as Oceans and Ninja. Then Snoozan and Bill accused me of posting 20,000 Anon comments all by myself. But, Nancy already outed us - the truth is we are all one person, Mike.

      I don't attend the Church of Scientology. But, I answered the door for a Jehovah's Witness once.

      Delete
    3. Damn! Me too!
      & I've been a Mike!
      I'm #Methodist. We've been over this.

      ♛

      Delete
    4. I have been accused of a great many things by everyone. Reality is I am my own person with my own opinions not mandated by this or any other blog

      Delete
    5. To be fair, there is very little mandating on this blog

      Delete
    6. Hey schoozan i think your in love with winsor aren't you

      Delete
    7. Mandating? Wtf did I miss?
      #wow Cranky, huh?
      Hope stuff perks up for ya, 8:57Anon.

      Delete
  22. I have decided that I am going to send a package that will include factual evidence of Lawless America Associations filing for a Trademark as a PAC along with other documents for review accompanied by my complaint that the business is a complete fraud. This is a serious issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure Susan will let Bill know ASAP!

      Delete
    2. I think everything you brought up is correct and a "big deal". But what your attorney has filed is a bigger deal and will superceed your big deal IMO

      Delete
    3. And the reason you're bragging about your decision here is?

      Delete
    4. Ditto Ginger.
      Superceed and much sooner.

      & ditto on Anon above's why?

      Delete
  23. I wish I could be a winner like Nancy!


    Nancy Evans
    The joeys are a bunch of losers.
    12 minutes ago

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What exactly is Glen saying? In Bill's and John Acree's worlds this could be a death threat against "Joeys", right?

      Glen Gibellina Only two reasons the "joeys" should not show up....MIA or DOA

      Delete
    2. "The movie cannot be completed until this lawsuit is resolved favorably to me"

      Read: "Don't get your hopes up. I told you back in September why you're never going to see yourself on the big screen and I've accomplished nothing..."

      Delete
    3. "Rode hard and put up wet is an expression here in Texas."

      What a doofus. Bill has no idea what that expression means, much less where it originated.

      Delete
    4. I hold the copyright on that chimpanzee pic, by the way...

      Delete
    5. If Glen were ever confronted in person by a "Joey", he'd piss himself while running away.

      Delete
  24. Here is a great article http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1322:record-audience-for-lawless-america-show-about-filing-criminal-charges-against-corrupt-judges-and-government-officials&catid=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105

    "Press *67, and call the general information number for the county, and they will give you the district attorney's number. Don't identify yourself or provide any information if you don't have to. Simply ask: When and where does the grand jury meet? Is there a grand jury inn session now? What days do they meet, and what time do they start each day? Visit the grand jury area before you do anything else just so you will have the lay of the land for when you or an agent delivers your sealed envelopes. Be able to tell an agent where the grand jury room is, where there is someone posted who may deny access, etc. Casually ask the name of any receptionists or security people. Take notes of everything."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well after all, Bill does call himself a Grand Jury Consultant. He has to do something to support that title. But I'd bet Fleming's next paycheck most of Bill's followers have no idea of the outcome for people that have attempted to hijack a legal jury.

      Delete
    2. On 2nd thought - maybe Bill's peeps do understand the consequences and that is why Bill's plan failed.

      Delete
  25. The difference between Lawless America and National Liberty Alliance is scary, IMO. People that joined LA appear to have been suckered in with the promise of being in a movie. Most of them just wanted to resolve one painful, personal legal issue. The master 'revolution' plan was slowly revealed to them, after they came to believe LA/Bill would solve their problem.

    There is no hidden agenda with NLA, they are proud of their plan to "take back our country". People joining that group are all in on overthrowing the government. And clearly some of the NLA people are not opposed to using violence (instead of a movie) to accomplish the goal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lawless America and NLA have one very important thing in common. They both have an idiot for a leader. IMO

      Delete
    2. Absolutely. Similarities are notable. Both formed revolutions because of their own legal butthurt. Both managed to enlist a bunch of people willing to follow and take legal advice from someone whose methods and theories consistently fail. And neither one can tolerate any challenges those methods and theories.

      Delete
    3. Just so You;ll know ..... FBI is pretty SKETCHY ..... Well VERY Sketchy :) My ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....... WOW Trillions really were Looted and YUP Real Estate Games are the EPICENTER ...... SHOCKING HUH ....... http://www.bing.com/search?q=Land+Speculation+Swindles+Trillions+Looted++Toxic+Zombie++Developments&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=land+speculation+swindles+trillions+looted+toxic+zombie+developments&sc=0-26&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=31ED08C631424C21A9A73E2CABA51A16

      Delete
  26. Mary Deneen cracks me up still going on with her "w/ repeated use of a "Big Knife" Icon" I remember that bill thought that my old Army photo with an M16 was threatening. What a joke. I think I will make all of my icons RPGs. They can take out lots of stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nancy cracks me up.

      Nancy Evans A friend of mine. Recieved that big knife dripping blood. After sending me a FB message. Saying "stay away from Nancy".

      Delete
    2. She is really delusional IMHO. I wonder do her children come visit her.

      Delete
    3. Would you, if she was your mother?
      If they do? They sure are kind hearted.

      Delete
    4. I still smile thinking about the fact that Bill uses to make fun of the size of Sean B member .... with the tiny hand and feet remarks.....

      Delete
  27. Judson Witham IS Not Hiding and Freedom is Worth It

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it Judson or Isaac? Is this what Bill is going to become? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxMXK2ar73A

      Delete
    2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CitZqV-Llk

      Delete
    3. Oooh! Vote for "Judson" yay! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKVBSFwqEtw

      Delete
  28. Isacc Judson sure has EXPOSED a huge pile of LAND SWINDLERS and BANKSTERS huh ....... Does NOT where a MASK and fact is How Many Trillions Missing Now in MORTGAGE FRAUD / REAL ESTATE CONS ??? What I find amusing is NOBODY can refute what I just shared. FELONIOUS COLONIAS and Land Cons Bank Swindles and all. SO Windsor and Darash have ISSUES ...... How Many BOGUS ASS LAND DEVELOPMENTS are there now connected to BANK LOOTINGS all across AMERICA ....... And for the DOUCHEBAGS using Fake Names ...... KISS MY (I) http://www.bing.com/search?q=Land+Speculation+Fraud+Toxic+Zombie+Bank+Looting+&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=land+speculation+fraud+toxic+zombie+bank+looting+&sc=0-23&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=2BF3D4675FA14469A4ED793E062A8781

    ReplyDelete
  29. I would add JERKS that hide behind FAKE NAMES are COWARDS :) Oh and here's some more of My Track Record ..... ENJOY ....... http://www.bing.com/search?q=Bank%20Fraud%20Land%20Speculation%20Toxic%20Zombie%20Panic&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=bank%20fraud%20land%20speculation%20toxic%20zombie%20panic&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=92D277FAAC764A9DB34B5646C0516AC9

    ReplyDelete
  30. In the county the people do rule and the process is Federally corrupted. You should have focused on that. No you would rather talk crap about someone who wants fairness and justice.

    ReplyDelete
  31. WOW ..... There is Power in the TRUTH Imagine That ...... Just so You;ll know ..... FBI is pretty SKETCHY ..... Well VERY Sketchy :) My ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....... WOW Trillions really were Looted and YUP Real Estate Games are the EPICENTER ...... SHOCKING HUH ....... http://www.bing.com/search?q=Land+Speculation+Swindles+Trillions+Looted++Toxic+Zombie++Developments&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=land+speculation+swindles+trillions+looted+toxic+zombie+developments&sc=0-26&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=31ED08C631424C21A9A73E2CABA51A16

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.