Thursday, September 4, 2014

Bill Enters His Own Legal Wilderness



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4qOlSHNnmKeblp1YzNkcEMzZE0/edit?usp=sharing

Windsor doesn't seem to understand the meaning of words.  Nor does he seem to be able to understand the meaning of judicial orders, or at least pretends to not know.  As we recall, in the California facebook case, the Judge said he had 10 days to obtain leave or the case will be dismissed. Bill decided to apply his selective hearing and pretend that the order was to apply for leave in 10 days.  In his letter to the federal judge, asking to obtain leave, he says he is been ordered to seek leave....nice little play on words but no you were ordered to obtain aka get leave. I'm sure Bill will adopt his old "I'm just a poor homeless pro-se litigant, how can I be expected to understand that" defense.

Another example of how Bill doesn't understand the meaning of words is in his continual description of Thrash's order as an alleged order.  No Bill, its not alleged, its real, in fact you attached it in this filing.  You may disagree with it, but its not alleged and you know that.

You can tell Bill is lost in his own wilderness as he can't even keep his train of thought for more than one sentence.   In this letter, he is asking the Judge to grant him leave but then says his argument is that the Judge doesn't have jurisdiction to grant said leave.  Its always a good idea to tell the judge that you are asking for a ruling from that he doesn't have the ability to give you that ruling anyway.

198 comments:

  1. It would really be nice for him to get sanctioned for this little stunt. His blatant disrespect for the Judge in CA, as well as all Judges he doesn't like-- is getting more brazen. He'll just keep mocking the courts until he gets hit in the wallet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here's a major poker-style tell to Windsor's madness: every time he writes "allegedly," you can bet he's LYING and further, he KNOWS
    he's lying!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And every time he says "upon information and belief" you can bet somebody told him a fairy tale full of schite and he's passing it on as fact.

      Delete
    2. So are you saying an anonymous Facebook message from someone named Billshit isn't "undeniable proof"?

      Delete
    3. No, no of course not. All of the people with fake names and all the movie stars that tell their tales to Bill are honest and have honorable intentions. Just ask him.

      Delete
    4. Oh. I forgot that. If Bill says it, it has to be true. He has never once told a lie.

      Delete
    5. I didn't write that with straight face ^^^, snickered the whole time.

      I would almost go sit in court just to listen to Bill explain the origin of his "information and belief" for suing a person he was told owns the blog (he even has a sworn affidavit to support that "fact") but he is harassing an entire family on FB and trying to sue them for owning the blog too.

      Delete
    6. Right, he believes he has the right to harass someones family, yet he goes all ballistic when anyone talks about his precious Barbara or Ryan. Forget the fact that there is good cause behind these claims (not just information and belief, actual physical evidence in paper form) that could potentially drag Barbara maybe Ryan into the lawsuit. That? I'd fly from Australia and get a roo sitter to watch!

      Delete
    7. I can't wait to see yet another USDC judge deal with that injunction!

      Delete
    8. I see the troll finally woke up. Susan, use your brilliance to get a job. Then maybe you wouldn't have so much late night free time to obsess over a stupid blog. Having a life is really fun, you should get one and try it.

      Delete
    9. ↑↑↑↑-TROLL ALERT-↑↑↑↑
      Courtesy Flush needed on Anon @ 11:49.

      Delete
    10. Geez, where is the clean up crew?

      Delete
    11. "1. The injunction is unlawful."
      Uh, is there case law to support this statement? Not once have you-- Snoozie or Windsor cited any law to back this up.

      "2. Willy must comply with it anyway unless he gets it vacated"
      Interesting since he avoids it like the plague. How is it, that Willy manages to side step this in almost every case he files? If the courts are SOOO corrupt, why is it that he hasn't been sanctioned yet, when he doesn't file in Federal court, but simply sends a "letter" to the Judge that may or may not get read, expecting to get leave? Is that manipulation of the court rules he loves so much, the real reason you vexi's believe the "courts" are corrupt? Because you are projecting your manipulations of laws onto them? Sure seems like it.

      Delete
    12. Typical Sovcit rhetoric. All orders they don't like are "void".

      But my personal favorite is that any old sworn notarized affidavit, consistent with facts or not, is absolute proof of their claims. Instead of playing a semantics game with Gingersnap, I'd like for Snoozie to explain how 37 affidavits from people swearing they have You Tube videos filmed by Windsor will convince any intelligent, mentally balanced person that there is in fact a movie in production.

      Delete
  3. Of course, the other poker tell to Windsor's madness is when his lips move.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or when his fingers are madly and frantically typing articles, facebook posts and court filings.

      Delete
    2. LOL somehow I don't think the reality side is ever visited. It's a closed door to vexi's.

      Delete
    3. I think the caption for the one pic, should be "Wicked Willy Windsor of the West."

      Delete
    4. ""Unscrupulous Willybill Windbarfbag of the North"

      Delete
  4. "Oh, THAT, order..."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know all this started with stalkers supposedly threatening his life, that he then travels to where they live and stalks them, touché!

    It's sort of morphed into people expressing their opinions about him (covered by the 1st amendment) that he's suing. What are his latest lawsuits?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. as far as we know....his cali one is on its death bed which then just leaves TX, oh and KS but they seem to ignore him completely there.

      Delete
    2. Just the facts: if you had chosen another screen name, I probably would have left your comment alone. But with that name I can't let it go - facts and history of the evolution are:

      People were expressing their opinion about him on this blog before he knew anything about it. He was being stalked, harassed and sent messages with veiled and not so veiled death threats. Windsor's stalker found this blog and set out to form a cyber gang to harass Windsor just because he could.

      About the same time, a bunch of his ex-lemmings found the blog and gladly joined the stalker's gang just because they were angry and didn't like him any more. It got ugly, some people crossed the bounds of common decency and fairness. Then, in the process of defending himself against a complaint filed by one of the ex-lemmings, it appears he figured out Thrash's order did not deny him access to the courts. So he started suing people because he could.

      He lost the case against the stalker because he made a HUGE public production of physically stalking his cyber stalker. And his stalker is a very highly skilled predator. To the unwary and uninformed the stalker appears to be an innocent victim. It didn't help that he publicly pee'd in his Cheerios too many times.

      With regard to other stalking adventures, those appear to be attempts to intimidate and deny the rights of people to discuss and speak up against his political view and public actions.

      Delete
    3. Spoken like a true Windsor loving spy for flawlessamerica.

      As you say, just the facts. At least only the facts you want to see.

      Delete
    4. Nope, your next door neighbor from Weatherford.

      Delete
    5. ahh, Booshie? I didn't recognize you without the foul language.


      Delete
    6. Is the bitch from Montana back? Does his wife know he's posting again. He finally figure out big bad Bill was gone and crawl out from under the desk he was hiding under?

      Delete
    7. LOL

      Trying to provoke a response?

      You're like the guy that refuses to let a girl break up with him.
      And just as childish.

      Do you need a hug?

      Delete
  6. Note to Bill:

    Regarding these crazed stalkers of yours, my recommendation:

    -Travel in your vehicle to where they live
    -Give updates on the web on where you are, and will be going
    -Antagonize and insult them
    -File frivolous lawsuits
    -Ignore the Judge's ruling in GA, one man's Vexatious Litigant is another's fighter for liberty from judicial oppression.
    -Insult the judges in your current cases
    -See if Barbara still has those leather pants

    ReplyDelete
  7. Marty Prehn Bill I have identified the person posting as Bob Cookout III that started the Marty Prehn Chronicles as she finally exposed herself and I was able to confirm that she is one of the people posting as Bob Cookout or Robert Cookout III. I will send to your her photo and her address, cell phone number and e-mail address as she has made comments about you on both the Marty Prehn Chronicles and the Joey is a little kid HATE blog group. I was able to meet with the current Michigan Secretary of State and a personal friend Ruth Johnson who will address some of these cyber stalkers and others that committed a retaliation eviction against me and the son of the owner of the car repair place in Eastpointe, Michigan and will request that the Michigan State Police conduct the investigation regarding these different legal issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn it! I was just getting used to being Fleming. Now I'll have to get new clothes again since I became a woman today.

      Delete
    2. Get out your slop buckets, Rob! Squeal Team Six is a comin' for ya!

      Delete
    3. He left some mongoose droppings on my blog as well (shameless blog plug)

      Http://tinyurl.com/MartyChronicles

      Delete
    4. Hi Lisa Wood...

      Delete
    5. ^^^^ haha. Another lawless idiot. She has nothing to do with this blog. Anyone stupid enough to believe Marty is a complete moron.

      Delete
    6. Whoa. RC3 has made the jump from Marlene to MVZ to his landlord to someone brand spanking new!

      RC3 is really anyone who he doesn't like (aka Detroit phone book).

      Delete
    7. I forgot. Flem's in there too, somewhere.

      Delete
    8. ok RC3 your off the hook per nancy your not lisa wood or anyone else. She says Marty is wrong and that infact...wait for it...

      Nancy Evans: "That's right Lynn. My ex is one of the biggest Perps among them. He is, I believe behind the joeys. I know by the words he uses his Sock Puppets. Oh boy.He did try to prevent me from being interviewed in New York. I got there. Bad stuff going on in this country. Full of Mkultra Slaves and their Illuminati Handlers."

      Delete
    9. Excuse me?
      Wtf is 'Mkultra Slaves' or 'Illuminati Handlers'?
      I don't think we have any of those in Kemp, Texas. But, since I dunno wtf they are? We could have oodles of them. We durn sure don't have any Nancys. Thank goodness!

      Delete
    10. Oh Brother, are a blow hard or what, "my personal friend Ruth Johnson Michigan Secretary of State". I bet you are a really important person, former VP of the homeowners association and secretary of the local Lions Club.

      I'm sure the Michigan State Police will put a task force on this as well.

      Hey, Wheel of Fortune is on in a few minutes, go make some popcorn.

      Delete
  8. "Lynn Maris- It's obvious this is not cyber stalking...this is an organized plot to take down Lawless and silence all victims of govt abuse and family court abuse featured on Lawless"

    First of all Lynn, no one stopped your stupid Lawless Loser Bunch film. That was Wicked Willie Windsor's plot to you dumbasses. Blame others for his failures. You all are so easily duped into these "Conspiracy" type theories.

    How about a bunch of random strangers who knew how to work the internet, searched out the man who said the "Constitution is Void" (among other moronic things he was putting out on the WWW) which lead them to find other blogs who were discussing the lunacy of your leader--and eventually landed here with others who completely disagree with Windsor's Revolution to take over the Government.

    Nope, no lemmings here Lynn. No conspiracy, not paid by the Government, just normal U.S. Citizens expressing our first amendment rights to stand up against a dictator like your god, who hates our Government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I meant to say is, it doesn't appear that Lynn Maris would buy into the randomness of like minded people finding each other on a world wide web. She posted this crap on Bill's page:

      http://rudy2.wordpress.com/electronic-brain-link-remote-neural-monitoring-ebl-rnm/

      And this a few minutes ago. Wowser.

      Lynn Maris People laughed at her...and she was right: “Anybody who is called the government is right. And anybody who isn’t called the government is not right,” she said. “And you know, all governments are connected to Google, and all governments can shift their search engines so only what they want you to see comes up… I want all kids to be aware of this digital circumstance…

      “Everyone on the internet is like, ‘Oh my God, come and join Facebook!’ They’re all so optimistic… and really, everyone is fucking you up behind the screens. And I don’t like that. It makes it difficult for me to interact with my fans knowing that. Google and Facebook were developed by the CIA, and when you’re on there, you have to know that.”

      — M.I.A.
      http://www.nme.com/news/mia/51302


      Delete
    2. LMAO - Lynn just posted this too.

      Lynn Maris I just have to say...if anyone is wondering if Bill is making progress... we are all posting on his page and not getting attacked or having our names smeared all over the internet. Didn't use to be like that. Bill is making a difference!

      Not much about her on the www. No video or testimony to Windsor. She's not happy in Minneapolis though. As she tells it, she lost her kids in a custody battle with abusive husband. PMA has her tagged in FB links, she has a legal fund and a blog.

      http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2013/09/msp_among_americas_happiest_healthiest_cities_huffpo_study_says.php

      https://www.facebook.com/144403455620196/photos/pb.144403455620196.-2207520000.1403152497./738656862861516/?type=1&permPage=1

      www.familycourtinjustice.wordpress.com

      https://www.facebook.com/events/111527392229479/

      Delete
    3. Lynn Maris What Bill sought to expose is exposing itself
      14 minutes ago

      Somebody might should tell Lynn, no, not really. Bill just found the settings button.

      Delete
    4. "it doesn't appear that Lynn Maris would buy into the randomness of like minded people finding each other on a world wide web."

      If they follow Windsor, of course they won't buy into reality. These are the same people that support his "Revolutionary Party" mantra. These are the people who hate our current Government and would very much like the opportunity to be elected into an office to run the U.S. Windsor said it numerous times, "they" would elect people, (assuming he's picking from his own people,) then "they" would retroactively pardon themselves from the actions they took to get there.

      I really still believe Windsor's real contention with this blog is the fact that we discussed and disagreed with what his plans were, and he got mad because he wasn't getting the "DC reaction" from us. His plans to start suing Government officials was premature since he didn't have the support he thought he would. So, what could he do to stall, and gain more followers?

      The whole "Revolutionary Party" was his agenda the entire time, the "movie" was only to get exposure to get him launched to the million people he needed to get the monopoly party he sought.

      I still don't really believe he intended to finish the "movie" it was more of the illusion that one would be made, to attract more attention. He tried desperately to get more people to notice him, and follow him. Now, it seems he is trying to make a "Landmark Case" to get his name out there in the main stream media, which every other effort he tried previously failed, by suing people in the largest frivolous case in history. Oh sure, he will spin it just as always, that it was "Corruption" and the courts were bought off because he's made everyone believe we are being paid by the Government, so even when he loses, he thinks he will win more followers who hate the Government. That's just the way I see it.

      If there were ever a "Landmark Case" to be made out of this, I would hope it would be one that has stronger protections for people's first amendment rights from vexatious wanna-be's like Windsor who play, use and abuse the Court System for self promotion. Anyone who makes a statement like Windsor did, that he will hunt down everyone who ever said anything against him, for the rest of his life? Shouldn't be free to roam the courts filing frivolous, bad faith cases simply to harass those who don't agree with him.

      Delete
    5. I was being sarcastic re: Lynn. Most of the people still following Windsor do not appear interested in being part of a political movement. Either they believe in all the nutter stuff or they want their own personal issues addressed and believe Windsor can fix it. The people with serious political motivations have joined other political reform groups.

      Windsor's movement failed at the same point similar movements begin to falter - at the point of plan execution. It appears Windsor's movement died off a little faster because most of the people he enlisted were unaware of his agenda until it came time for the dirty work. To this day, it appears most of the LA followers are unaware the movie idea was a tool to collect body count and build data bases.

      As regards to making a marketable movie and having a "landmark" case of defamation - IMO, these are grandeur delusions. Blaming his critics for the failure of the movie, the movement and his marriage is easier than accepting reality.

      Delete
    6. IMO, dead solid perfect analysis, Anon 10:05--well done! Your forth paragraph is exactly correct: Lawless America was and is a "bait & switch" ploy for political power by offering victims (real or imagined) an opportunity to get exposure for their corruption story.

      Delete
    7. Also, in keeping the conspiracy theories alive and kicking with the lemmings, is that why he hasn't mentioned that the Lawless America Community page was put back up a while ago? He probably doesn't want to explain to those still on that page, who aren't on his personal page what's going on with the 'movie,' or why he hasn't done anything for their personal plights. I think that was the page where people would ask him "what are you doing for me?" to which he typically ignored the questions.

      Perhaps he doesn't want people knowing that page is up and running, so he can still cry and whine that Facebook "destroyed" his following when they deactivated that page. Maybe he doesn't want the 39,000 + followers being mentioned in court? And he can't deactivate it himself after he bitched and moaned so much about it being illegally removed--no one to blame then. But, all in all, it shows that Windsor is not honest.

      Delete
  9. Bill Windsor is truly a man who wants to stop free speech and kill the First Amendment by picking apart everyone who has ever criticized him, except his mother and father. Windsor is a predator who never intended to make an honorable movie. What he's doing is on the sickest order. He's a self-serving serial liar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Huh. Lynn Maris posted this link, with selected verbiage, under Windsor's post with a photo of a woman he is bashing, along with an entire family he's identified, simply because someone (probably anonymously) gave him "information and belief" that these people may have been critical of him. Ironic that this describes Windsor's behavior over the last 1.5 years. Except the part about violent tendencies. Windsor hasn't shown any indication he would become violent (but you knows what some of the less sound lemmings might do?). Clearly his goal is to harass and intimidate his critics into silence.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ6LkyTq0D8&feature=youtu.be&list=PL2B3578633E3995F3

      Delete
  10. Look past the southern accent and "grandfatherly" charm, and Windsor appears to be nothing but a spoiled, vindictive, pathetic man who throws tantrums, makes stuff up out of whole cloth, and literally stalks and harasses people in person and by using the courts, the internet, and domain name registries as his weapons. It’s all spelled out here on this blog, and here in this Bill Windsor/Lawless America exposé.

    His ad nauseum bloviation via his writings, his online "radio show" and very poorly produced videos, the thousands of documents he's bombarded the courts with over the decades--all steered by his insatiable ego--is what has led to his public figure notoriety to now [accurately] be that of a carnival-barking, vendetta loving, vexatious litigant.

    But to him? We’re all criminals for exercising free speech, and he’s an innocent victim of what he’s now harping to be “the biggest case of defamation in history".

    Grow up, Windsor. Look back at your soon to be 7 decades of life, and ask yourself if this is really who you want to be – a soured old man who is going to die alone and lonely. And no, that isn’t a death threat, but you’ll likely claim it is.

    Stacy Emerson
    (whose name Windsor registered as a domain name as a harassment tactic)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree 100% with what you said. Not really sure how anyone can justify purchasing domain names and setting up sites to slander people like he does, pretending they are "news." He's probably got thousands just sitting there, waiting for him to unleash his tyrannical vendettas. Including Judges and Attorneys with all those individual "haters."

      Clearly a psycho move if you ask me, to maliciously go out and buy a domain of someone who simply voiced their opinion, which differed from his, who ruled against him, who argued against him etc. Who does that? I mean, that's is pathetically sick and demented.

      Also--Bravo!! That site is amazing.

      Delete
    2. That's what I'd deem premeditated revenge.
      Just buy them all up, because you can & later when Windsor's thoroughly angered enough? He'll use it to create a hate webpage using it. He's done it numerous times now. It's a pattern. A premeditated pattern.
      He's too busy being a pussy ass bitch to really be a leader of anything, much less a 'director/filmmaker', even my teenagers can whoop out a movie in an afternoon! YouTube videos? Upload those lickity split.
      Being a vexatious creep is his forte~ He has peaked with that. How many court victories does he hold? (insert crickets here) ~0~ Ha! He even sucks at what he believes he does best!
      That? Is funny.

      Delete
  11. I was just wondering. If it takes one. To know one. Are You possibly, projecting.Your Own Wilderness of Error, onto Bill by any chance? Food for thought.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't believe anyone, besides you, has used that childish idiom.

      Food for thought: Maybe you should hang out with Pee Wee Herman fans instead of reading here. We may be way too grown up for you to understand and follow along.

      Delete
    2. Just go back over to Windsor's FB and re read Nancy's posts, using her idioms back to her..."takes one to know one" and you'll be laughing your ass off literally! Now, whenever she posts anything, that's what I will be thinking. Hahahahahahaha

      Delete
    3. http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quickmeme.com%2Fp%2F3vswk0&h=0&w=0&tbnid=lZLXh4jw16wcSM&zoom=1&tbnh=168&tbnw=300&docid=CMjTnlAWtLQ-9M&tbm=isch&client=firefox&ei=THkMVIjQNYbv8AG614CQAQ&ved=0CAIQsCUoAA

      Delete
    4. Last I checked, I have internet at the golf course. It's 2014. Or are we all still in internet cafes on dial up AOL?

      Delete
  12. Bill throws tantrum? Is that, an example of the pot calling the kettle black?
    Assuming that YOU know quite well yourself. What a tantrum is.Having never outgrown them yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nan, go get help. Or better yet, pack some boxes and move to a healthier place.

      Delete
  13. Why I wonder, do you see Bill as such a threat to you. That you are investing so much of your time in monitoring his every move.
    Why not put your own life story under that microscope of yours? That might open up some eye and ears. Including your own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seem to be a few fries short of a Happy Meal, so I'll do my best to bring you up to speed. Hopefully, you will take your own advice - put your goals and choice of leaders under a microscope.

      1) Bill is/was a threat to this nation. Bill is a threat to everyone that disagrees with him. We all have a right to disagree with anyone that threatens our way of life without fear of being physically stalked or dragged into court with outrageously false and frivolous claims.

      2) Bill made himself the center of attention, long before anyone here knew anything about him. He just failed to realize that in doing so the inherent flaws in his thinking and ideas would result in criticism. He does not have viable arguments to support his agenda or the skills to handle disagreements like a mature, well adjusted adult. His continued legal attacks, physical stalking, attempts at intimidation and publicly bashing private individuals he knows nothing about, keep him in the center of our attention. Bill is responsible for the attention he gets.

      3) The time invested now is solely a result of the multiple frivolous law suits Bill filed a) in attempt to silence his critics, b) to gather more evidence of government "corruption" and c) to get more attention. If Bill would PTFD, everyone else would STFU because there would not be anything to "monitor".

      Delete
    2. Here is another good example of how Windsor is a threat - he draws people that are not credible in their claims of corruption. I don't want somebody like this involved in governing our country.

      Xtine minimizes her crimes, it wasn't vandalism of a cemetery. She was convicted on 3 counts of grave robbing. She also has 4 convictions for burglary. Her initial sentence was suspended but she couldn't behave herself (she threatened to kill 5 people) and was sent to prison.

      Xtine Johnes I was way over sentenced in Fairfax, VA as an 18 year old kid by a crazy circuit court judge Richard Jamborsky (who is under investigation now) for vandalizing a cemetery so that the judge and the prosecutor could get ahead and the judge was probably getting paid to send people to a crazy drug treatment program like in Kids For Cash, it was terrifying and totally corrupt. My family lost $10,000 and I lost 3 years of my life. I had been abused and they were wrong to do this to me, I needed counseling not more severe traumatic punishment. Virginia is a horrid place to live, never move there.

      http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1111092.html

      http://leg2.state.va.us/dls/h&sdocs.nsf/fc86c2b17a1cf388852570f9006f1299/0f64558e557bd2a785256fb00061e65a/$FILE/SD2.pdf

      Delete
    3. Wow! I wondered about her yesterday, and what the real deal was. I have come to the conclusion, when reading the stories they post, more than likely the courts got it right, and they are all just exhibiting Billbutthurtness. I'm thinking this is the new terminology to be used in courts to replace "frivolous." Oh, or this might be the new standard term to weigh "colorable" claims vs "Billbutthurtness" claims. One must pass this test before the court enters any suits into the docket.

      Delete
    4. I like that one - Billbutthurtness. You should call it, (c) Anon 10:33.

      Delete
    5. You got my back NB. It's ours!

      Delete
  14. Spending time HERE.When you could be out there PLAYING A ROUND OF GOLF? Does not make any sense to me. Unless..you are afraid of exposure yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why aren't you out playing a round of golf? Do you think poking at us is going to change a thing? Other than Bill stalking us in our homes and suing people because "information and belief" that someone disagrees with him, what type of "exposure" should we fear?

      If you are so confident in your position and that everyone posting here is wrong, why are you posting as anonymous?

      Delete
    2. Last I checked, I have internet at the golf course. It's 2014. Or are we all still in internet cafes on dial up AOL?

      Delete
  15. Why dif Oceans decide to leave this blog? Is he or she disgusted or just plain bored with your obsessive stalking of Bill ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did Oceans leave?

      And you've got it 180 degrees wrong. Bill is stalking us. Have you not read his complaints? He is suing more than 1,000 people. You have to know has repeatedly asked for personal information on people that have a right to speak anonymously. What do you think he's doing with that information? If you really don't know, you can say so - we'll be happy to fill you in. Or, you can look at the photo of the woman and comments posted on Bill's page in the last few days. What do you think that woman did to deserve what Bill and his followers have said about her?

      Delete
    2. oceans did not leave. I am right here! And the only one I am disgusted by is Bill and his vexi and stalking stuff.

      Nancy, I still feel sorry for you. I wish you would get some help for your delusions that everyone is your ex husband. You really crossed the line when you began to claim murdered children were somehow your step children because you think a man who has been in jail for decades is really your ex and was never in jail. Not to mention trying to turn your own children into Nazis by blood. You my dear are the one who really needs help, one only needs to read your posts to get the real picture.

      Delete
  16. What makes you think Oceans left?
    Since when did following a semi-public figure's antics becoming stalking? If some 'person' is willing to put any & everything out on the Internet? It becomes fodder for discussion and even scrutiny. Bill's shit doesn't pass the truth test. Don't be all butthurt because you got sucked into it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I can assure the Anon commenter that not EVER have I EVER stalked, drove by or near Windsor's residence(s), in any state.
    Never have I uttered, much less posted on the Internet anything, real or fabricated about a single member of Windsor's now supposedly estranged family. Not the living ones and damned sure not the deceased ones.
    Just because Windsor claims something? Doesn't make it fact, Anon.
    #consequences #lies #stalking #harassment #vexatious #SovCit
    Those are #tags I know befit William M Windsor.
    I love my nation, flaws and all. I'm thankful to have been born an American, and be able to exercise my many rights afforded me by THE Constitution. If Windsor wants to file millions of pages of frivolous motions in a lawsuit in the state of Texas that includes me? He best make damned skippy he's got as many verifiable FACTS about me, my alleged 'crimes' against him, as I do him.
    Personally? I am extremely ANXIOUS to just be in the same room with this piece of vile filth, a courtroom is just an added bonus. I want my sons to get a good look at this Windsor and see the skanky coward that chose their father's name and image to blast across his Facebook and .com site on the day of his death. Both my 16 and 12 year old sons will have to look way down to glimpse the little lying piece of shit, but both are man enough already for the task. Neither would ever cower, or attempt to avoid looking anyone in the eye. Both of my sons deserve the opportunity to get a gander at Windsor, up close, instead of a fleeting glance of a speeding bumper, stirring dust or mere images photoshopped and edited via the web. I'll be making certain both attend the next 'Windsor vs the entire Internet' hearing in the 40th District Court in Ellis County, Texas.
    Windsor? Make certain you twist my above words into something they're not, so they fit your "in fear" tale. Dissect each word carefully. The family of Darin Karl and many of our friends look very forward to seeing you soon, very soon, in that courtroom.

    #anticipation
    #SemperFiWife
    #SemperFiLife
    ~KMc~

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ KMc - I want to make sure I understand your comment. Windsor was stalking you and your boys at your home?

      Delete
    2. Yup.
      On more than one occasion over several months.
      Kemp isn't really on his list of places to be, ya think?
      He even bragged about it on his FakeBook page in January.

      ~KMc~

      Delete
  18. Hahahahaha. William Windsor is a Joey.

    "Spending time HERE.When you could be out there PLAYING A ROUND OF GOLF? Does not make any sense to me. Unless..you are afraid of exposure yourself."

    What's next? Crazy-a$$ butthurt Willy Windbag is gonna sue himself. It's time for him to be sanctioned and spend time in jail for fraud, stalking, defamatory misconduct unbecoming of a public figure.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Nancy Anon likes to come on here, make incoherent posts asking dumb questions, but she never reads the replies. Probably why she has no clue about Windsor and what he is really doing to innocent people. She doesn't bother to read, or research anything. It's futile to post logical, rational comments back to her, she's far too delusional to understand much less comprehend. Everyone is Mike, who isn't Mike, and everyone is a Tranny Nazi. While she likes to say her riddles about "pot's calling kettles black" does she not get what she says herself that makes her the pot? and the kettle?

    I'd have to ask Nan Nan why Windsor didn't ask her for an affidavit. You know, if she's "all knowing" and all. Why doesn't Windsor ever respond to you Nan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I didn't think that was Nancy, since she didn't call any one Mike. I thought it might be a new fruit loop.

      Delete
    3. If he had any good sense, he would at least delete her, but this is a guy who repulses his own daughter, Brittany Harrell. The mention of him makes her skin crawl. Windsor is left with the craziest of the crazies. No one else wants anything to do with him except to get him to stop his nut job antics.

      Delete
    4. It's the periods in the wrong places, her incoherent ramblings, and her mention of Oceans leaving. She said the same thing on Windsor's FB.

      Delete
    5. I wondered about the punctuation, had a familiar ring. Darn it. I hate I wasted thought on her.

      Delete
    6. Hahahaha!! Well, they were great thoughts/opinions that I'm sure other readers will appreciate, and understand, so it's not all wasted.

      While the spinning lemmings drink up every Windsor word, the rest of the real world knows what he's doing, how he's physically stalking, harassing and intimidating innocent people. Can't get around that. Not enough spin.

      Delete
    7. NBTDT Nancy hasn't quite figured out how to post from her phone. The biggest give away (other than her concern with me) is the weird periods in her comments. She double spaces in her text and gets autocorrected LMMFAO

      Delete
  20. Hey Nancy...did you know the Lawless America Community Facebook page that was deleted is now back up and working? Why do you think Windsor hasn't told you whack-a-doodles? It's been back up for quite a while. Go check.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He wouldn't want to announce that the alleged damages by facebook were all gone, would he. It's back up and loosing likes, now at 39,910 from 50k. Facebook never "damaged" Bill. Bill damaged Bill.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, the subscription for the #likes is running out. Those can be purchased in blocks of 500, 1,000, 5,000.
      You'll probably notice the drops in those same increments.
      Purchasing those? Direct violation of Facebook's #TOS, right Willy?

      Delete
  21. Bill, are you a monster of a grandparent or what? You are bringing pain and anguish to your son Ryan Windsor, daughter Brittany Harrell, their respective families, and each of your granddaughters as they grow up. You seem to be arrogant and care NOT even about the innocent children in your own family by picking fights with people without cause in what seems to be for their money. (Mary and Walter Windsor paid him off for being obnoxious and he still thinks if he makes a nuisance of himself, people will pay him off to go away. Shame on you for not growing up, Bill.) This is a tactic that has never worked for you in courts and it's never going to start working. Bill, you need to make some changes and start caring about your family. STOP MENACING as a vexatious litigant, try to get yourself balanced in some type of therapy or in-patient treatment and try to work something out with your family by asking, or at this point, begging them for forgiveness. You have taken things to such an extreme they might not even consider letting you back in unless you show substantial good-faith efforts. You are embarrassing yourself, for goodness sakes. You don't want to be alone without them in your old age. Yes, your 50-state tour was exciting, you met lots of people, but that's over and you're getting older. People are falling away because of your odd behavior and intimidation tactics. Again, think of your family and everyone's well-being, man. Stop blaming others and take responsibility for what you're doing. If you don't stop, bad-faith sanctions should be sought by each and everyone of your defendants. Enough is enough of your litigation pig piles. It is your duty to behave respectably for your family. Trust has been severely broken with them and you will have to make extraordinary strides to rebuild that. IMO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've wondered what Walter and Mary really thought of their son. Bill's litigation goes back more than thirty years. There are multiple failed ventures through out the years. And Walter lent his name and money to many.

      I thought I remembered that Walter was an audiophile and collected old records which Bill & Ryan helped set up some (now defunct) website for. And then, recently I heard on one of Bill's radio shows where Bill basically claimed the collection and hobby were his own. It seems that Bill has done this all his life. He takes other people's ideas (college tshirts, krispy creme, travel ticket sales, his revolution) and trys to jump on the band wagon. He might have had some moderate success in the tshirt convention biz, but in the end, the couple things that he touched that had any success were because of his successors. I wonder what the general opinion of those he worked with are. I would guess it's not that positive.

      Delete
    2. Damn Anon 4:14
      I almost had a weak moment & thought "yeah, Windsor! Go! Beg your family for that one more chance!"
      Fuck him. If they're smart? They'll be thankful to be rid of his sorry miserable, useless ass. Life goes on. Most likely for them, much more peacefully.
      Let him burn himself out at both ends. He's doing a fine job, thus far.
      His family has nothing to be embarrassed about, they didn't do any of this. He's grown, he chose his path. His destination is lonely isolation. It should be well within view from where he is now.

      Delete
    3. The only part I don't agree with, is that Windsor is suing all these people FOR the loss of said family. While they sit there with their backs turned, heads in the sand or noses in the air, acting like the 3 fricking monkeys "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil"...knowing WHY they fricken left in the first place and not reaching out to one of the attorneys to offer a statement or affidavit that Windsor is a big, fat fricken liar, then I have no sympathy for their situation and humiliation.

      He wants MILLIONS for the loss. (regardless of the lack of merit in his case) the fact is that he fricken filed it, and now everyone has to defend it. IF the Windsor's had ONE OUNCE of COMPASSION for anyone other than themselves they would have spoken up a long time ago. IMO

      Yes, it's terribly sad what he put them through. Yes, Barbara could have and should have left his delusional ass years ago--but she didn't. She only left after Boushie sent her a letter threatening to sue her, and Windsor said on his KS video that she was afraid she would lose all her money fighting the "haters." So, did she divorce him to save her money and they are really still together, just not on paper, or did she really ditch his fat ass for real. These are the Windsor's. Haven't seen anything truthful from, to or about that family. Sorry but that is my opinion.

      Delete
    4. The smartest one is Robert--probably because he wasn't a Windsor. He cut Windsor off long before this Lawless gig. Windsor was crying about "grandparent" rights the whole time he was filming people. He always talked to people about not being able to see his grandkids. So with that, I believe they are the only one's truly who cut Bill off. I feel bad for the grandkids. Look at the legacy they will have to endure. Shameful!

      Delete
    5. @6:56 While Windsor stairs at his bellybutton and complains to the public, his public - me ma mo me ma mo - that he can't see his grandkids. It was all his doing. He crafted the legacy he's handing his granddaughters. No one with a conscious, caring bone in their body would do what he's done to children coming up. Shameful!

      Delete
    6. What exactly are they, his family supposed to do?
      Lay it out. Step by step.
      Why is his estranged family responsible for anything Windsor has done?
      Not once have any of them ever driven by home, harassed me or my family, nothing. It's all been Windsor.
      I'm just not grasping the theory that anyone is responsible for Windsor, except himself.

      Delete
    7. Anon 6:41. The divorce agreement between Windsor and Barbara specifically states that she has no liability regarding lawless matters, but since she was involved in the businesses it doesn't matter what the dissolution papers say. Litigation/business law supersedes divorce law. If she divorced the fat ugly ass to avoid payouts from judgments, she got bad advice. I have a feeling she just can't stand him anymore. He's hard to look at. Just seeing a picture of him make you want to upchuck.

      Delete
    8. You are correct in that only bill is responsible for his actions. The family isn't required to do anything. But it would be commendable of them if they spoke publicly about the lie he is using by saying his "haters" at responsible for his family leaving him. All that is nesessary for evil to conquer is when good people are silent? Are there any good people in that family? Or are they just happy with not being quilty?

      Delete
    9. Is the family aware that is one of his claims?

      Delete
    10. Business filings include Barbara's name so don't forget to include her on any papers prepared for the court. I think she's still on the hook. She at least has to provide documentation and testimony otherwise.

      Delete
    11. If the Windsor family isn't aware of his claims, they will be.

      Delete
    12. Ginger Snap, The Windsor family has been through so many vexatious rounds with Bill that they really should speak up, but since Barbara affiliated herself in Bill's businesses, she may certainly have to defend Bill's actions. What they really should do is step in and have him committed for evaluation to determine onset of mental illness issues. Since Bill's vexatious nature started many years ago, they may be afraid to face the results and they've accepted him acting this way for a long time (possibly part of the arrogant Texas culture that's going by the wayside). In any case, Bill will be shut down soon, at least in the courts because just about everyone within the judicial system knows he has screws loose. That's not to say that he won't keep buying and publishing websites against anyone and everyone he's had or created a tiff with. Speaking of which, the Montana Supreme Court ordered Windsor to relinquish the Boushie website, but he hasn't. Bill is more stubborn than a bull moose and he's eventually going down hard, leaving that embarrassing legacy for the grandkids. It's likely that they'll wonder if they, too, are facing insanity.

      Delete
  22. "It is your duty to behave respectably for your family."

    Yep. That's it in a nut shell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The lights are on, but nobody's at home on this one.

      Delete
  23. If it gets into discovery just think of the questions to be asked of his family if needed. Not sure loss of family is a real claim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least Barbara has to respond. Not too certain about other family members' obligations.

      Delete
    2. Flemming enjoys this vexi shit as much as Windsor. I hope his badassed attorney will continue the at bat for him, while he's safely tucked away in Michigan.
      Keep hagging Windsor's family and perhaps they'll drag your into the frackus Flemming.

      Delete
    3. There's a way to depose/subpoena/interrogatory family members and those of us who are being sued need to prepare for that if the judge allows the case to proceed. Ready, set, go! Let's expose the Windsor family.

      Delete
    4. Only spouses can refuse to testify - and that's optional.

      Ex spouses are not offered that option. Testify or it's contempt of court. Sit in jail until you're ready to talk.

      Delete
    5. Somebody needs to file counterclaims against Willy and Barb and maybe Ryan so he can present testimony to include himself or to disprove with obvious possible criminal law cited. It also looks like Bill was involved in the Harrell family business too, so Brittany and her hubby et al. need to respond to some questions. If the court doesn't allow amending the caption and case with at least Barbara, she really should come forward and give testimony helping Bill's victims, I mean if the judge actually allows this case to go on. Just sayin'

      Delete
    6. "Somebody needs to file counterclaims..."

      Yeah, so yo go right ahead, do it. Why wait for someone else to do the dirty work?

      Delete
    7. More than one somebody. It's being drafted while Willy's fingers are cranking out nonsensical ramblings and navel gazing.

      Delete
    8. OK. So why is it necessary to discuss your legal strategy in public? Are you looking for an 'atta boy'? Or, do you just think it would be cute for 1,000+ people to jam up the courts with legal harassment of an entire family?

      Delete
    9. Harassment of an entire family? Do we have to go over this again NBTDT. Babs was the Director and Ryan has been helping with company resources. Its a family affair.

      Delete
    10. NBTDT I have a copy of an email I sent to Barbara, Either he has access to her email or she sent it to him. but it was not forwarded to him it was a copy of it from her directly and or that he replied himself and had access. Either way her name is the director on the initial incorporation and bill does not dispute that.

      Delete
    11. More accurately, Babs was the CEO of "The Windsor Companies", Babs deposited all of the "donations" to the fake movie, aka lawless america, into her personal checking account and paid for Billy Boys stalking gas supply and lavish hotel rooms, and pie. Yes we do have cancelled checks. All of Windsor's websites were hosted and had data stored on the alcatraz media servers. None of this stopped until the Windsor family had their little intervention that Billy Boy stormed out of and rode away off into the sunset to stalk his latest victim. So yes, Babs and Ryan are culpable to a certain degree. When they thought they would be getting sued, they cut him off with an ultimatum, not before. but Im sure you will spin that in your own distorted pro Windsor way.

      Delete
    12. Yep. Let's go over it again.

      1) Unless some fool pushes it out of bounds, this case is not going to get that far.

      2) You are preaching to the converted.

      3) If you are named in a complaint and have a strategy, keep it to yourself - see #1.

      4) As this case is not likely to get much further and you are preaching to the choir, this all amounts to nothing but chest pumping & belly bumping. Which is totally ineffective in shutting Bill down. And probably will get more innocent people and their family members dragged in.

      5) As these threats are tactically pointless, listing ways and reasons Bill's family should be dragged into a mess Bill, his followers and his stalker caused looks a lot like another attempt to form an bully gang. Just sayin'.

      Delete
    13. Yep, more Windsor ass kissing by NBTDT.

      Delete
    14. uh, no - bully busting. Don't you have some beakers to clean?

      Delete
  24. LMAO - over at NLA one of the coordinators was blasting the attorneys on Fogbow for making fun of NLA, took exception to the use of screen names and was upset by the suggestion the Fogbow people are eating popcorn & watching NLA for amusement. One of the Fogbow guys wrote this response:

    As an introduction:

    "My name is Howard Appel. I am a lawyer, a member of the California Bar (member number 158674), a proud democrat, a proud supporter of President Obama, a proud member of the FOGBOW and a very proud LIBERAL. I am also 100% confident, because I have actually studied the law and completely read the cases you so cavalierly throw around, that CLGJ are not authorized by statute, by the US Constitution or by common law and that no US Federal Judge, including Justice Scalia, will ever support any of this nonsense. I am so confident that I am willing to wager any of you CLGJ "scholars" any amount you wish (up to $100,000) that you will lose, lose and lose.

    None of the Federal Judges to whom the latest nonsense we sent will sign any of it. And yes, I will be eating hot popped, freshly buttered (with lots of butter) popcorn and laughing as Mr. Darash takes all of you to the cleaners."

    If any of you have the courage of your convictions (talking to you Mr. Darash), please email me at howardappel@yahoo.com to set up the mechanics of the wager.

    Submitted by howardappel on Sun, 09/07/2014 - 15:56



    So then, one of the NLA guys in FL hi-jacked a real grand jury and was arrested. Howard came back with this:

    Terry's arrest

    TO DARASH AND THE REST OF YOU:

    Terry was not following instructions for the lawfully constituted grand jury, he attempted to hijack the proceedings of the lawfully constituted grand jury and he attempted to simulate legal process, a criminal act, by pretending to take government sanctioned legal action.

    Old saying, don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Simulating legal process is a crime in Florida. It was pointed out on the Fogbow many times that simulating legal process is a crime in Florida and you instead elected to believe what Darash, a peddler of snake-oil, was selling you. Another old saying, not knowing the law is not a defense to criminal liability. Neither is stupidity. You were told that this could lead to criminal liability and now it has.

    Lastly, just so you can accuse me of not being a mature adult, NEENER, NEENER, NEENER, WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!

    Submitted by howardappel on Sun, 09/07/2014 - 15:46


    http://www.jasonwhoyt.com/blog/2014/9/3/breaking-dixie-county-fl-whistleblower-arrested-reporting-a-crime-is-now-deemed-criminal-activity

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/09/07/1327808/-Now-For-a-Little-Common-Law-Grand-Jury-Schadenfreude

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He did too. Terry Trussell hijacked a Grand Jury to consider charges against School board members, two governors, Bill Gates and General Electric for a whole bunch of things, including treason. He got upset that the DA wouldn't play the game, so the DA was indicted too.

      LMAO at Trussell's complaint about 4 bailiffs guarding the door. I guess he missed all those "Ask Mr. Bill" shows where Windsor was instructing people how to sneak in to gain access to the jury.

      http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/files/florida/14-08-04%20letter%20filed.pdf

      http://api.ning.com/files/dbDz8bz8Q7n8Fur01S6gLwQUVwzMTl2spQE9mK7c0Gltdz3Kr6GgpfJoxDoLluM4M6aLsSwpeGqtN5rb4dCXOvHayqme6AjJ/CLDJDixieCountyFL8172014.pdf

      Delete
    2. OH MY FREAKING GOSH! Lookie here, speaking of the devil. Bill Windsor, himself, with all his fine "Grand Jury Consultant" advise, has made it to NLA:

      Mon, 09/08/2014 - 07:33
      dwallisbryant

      New Way to Reach Grand Juries Nationwide

      Our best hope to get judicial corruption and government corruption addressed is with our local grand juries.

      William M. Windsor has developed a great new initiative to enable many of us to reach grand juries with our criminal complaints. Here's how....

      These are my opinions as a layperson reviewing what it takes to bring criminal charges against corrupt government officials and employees.

      Research your state's statutes on grand juries. Determine what types of grand juries exist in your state, and determine what the laws are relative to grand juries. Look for three specific pieces of information:

      Does your state's grand jury statutes say that any citizen is allowed to present charges and evidence to the grand jury? Those states that I have thus far found to say this are Florida and Tennessee. There may be many more.
      Does your state's grand jury statutes provide that a judge is ultimately responsible for the grand jury? I believe every state with grand juries probably has this provision. Who is it? Is it always the same judge, or does it vary? Call the jury department of the office of the clerk of the court and find out. Get the name of the judge who swore-in and/or is responsible for the current grand jury. Find out when this grand jury's term expires.
      Does your state's grand jury statutes grant powers to the district attorney, state's attorney, or prosecuting attorney? If so, what are those rights?

      Delete
    3. Con't

      If any Citizen is allowed to present Evidence to the Grand Jury

      If any citizen is allowed to present evidence to the grand jury, then you need to prepare your charges and evidence, and then make the request in writing to the Grand Jury as well as the District Attorney / County Attorney / Prosecutor with proof of service. Certified mail return receipt should be used. You can also hand-deliver it.
      What to do with the Responsible Judge

      If you are blocked in your efforts to reach the grand jury, then jury tampering has probably taken place. So, you need to go to the courtroom of the responsible judge and ask to address the court. Have a document prepared that summarizes what happened, and have your evidence. Ask the judge to press charges against those who committed the crime of jury tampering, and demand that you be given the right to present your changes and evidence to the next grand jury. Here is the Letter that i sent to Judge Kelly Amanda Lee regarding my experience with jury tampering. This will give you an idea of what you would want to write about.
      If the District Attorney / County Attorney / Prosecutor has No Authority over the Grand Jury

      If your state's grand jury statues give the District Attorney / County Attorney / Prosecutor no authority over the grand juries, then you must insist that they back off and do nothing to interfere with your efforts to speak to the grand jury.

      If they don't back off, file a legal action against the Office of the District Attorney seeking a declaratory judgment. You want a court to declare what the District Attorney / County Attorney / Prosecutor is and is not permitted to do based upon your state's grand jury statutes. I'd like to see one of these get filed in every state. The goal will be to get courts in every state declaring that the District Attorney / County Attorney / Prosecutor have NO RIGHTS of auhtority over the grand juries and that they may not interfere with any citizen's right to present information to a grand jury.

      THIS WILL BE HUGE. This is how we can reclaim the people's rights to grand juries. This is how we can address the criminal activities of attorneys, judges, and government officials of all types.

      Please let me know if you will handle your state. Email me at bill@LawlessAmerica.com or call me at 770-578-1094. I will keep a spreadsheet showing who is handling each state. I will try to identify people to handle states where no one volunteers.

      California -- A judge is responsible for the grand jury. California Penal Code 911, 917m and 918 allow a citizen to present charges and evidence to a grand jury. The District Attorney, County Counsel, and Attorney General may not be present unless advise is requested by the grand jury. No one from the office of the district attorney may be present when charges are being investigated involving anyone employed by or connected with the office of the district attorney. Investigations of corruption by a grand jury may be PUBLIC. One year terms. The judge appoints the foreman. There are provisions for additional grand juries. There is no authority over the grand juries by a District Attorney, County Attorney, Prosecutor, or anyone else. If the District Attorney has claimed authority, the DA is violating the statutes as the DA has no authority. If the DA has claimed authority, California is a state where a declaratory judgment action should be filed.
      Los Angeles County Grand Jury.
      California Grand Jury News.

      http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&...

      Delete
    4. http://nationallibertyalliance.org/comment/2387#comment-2387

      Delete
    5. I wonder if they know Bill's stance on what he said.....they should check with him before they go linking all over the internet on what he said. "No no no....I never said that, that's not how we are choosing to remember that because I have just now been made aware that its considered a form of paper terrorism and calling me that is defamation.....you hear me, thats how we are remembering it"

      Delete
    6. And besides, claiming to be a nationally known authority on grand juries could compromise my contention I'm not a public figure.

      Delete
    7. You mean compromise his public figure contention further. He's done a State of the Union address, remember? That point is already blown, but he continues to say "am not a public figure." He's a crazy looser and I'm just waiting for him to go down.

      Delete
    8. Following guidelines similar to instructions of the "nationally known authority on grand juries" got the NLA guy charged with 10 felony counts of illegally simulating the legal process and obstruction of justice (according to NLA).

      Delete
    9. I can't find a press release or official report of Trussell's arrest, but I found this.

      http://www.hardisonink.com/police.html

      Delete
    10. Yep, can't dispute that.
      The dictators are getting their sheep to do their dirty work for them. Cult? Yepperz. No way around that. They preach, brain wash, teach and educate yet walk away unscathed, whistling like they knew nothing. That's why they (both Windsor and Darash) solicit leaders from each state/county and expect them to lead the sheep to the slaughter house. If the leader isn't also doing the same work, chances are it's a bad fricken idea.

      Delete
    11. On Darash's call last night, he said they only need 13,000 people, 4 in each county, to take over the country and "come to power". One of the callers suggested Darash hook up with Windsor because Windsor has the testimony of 3,000 people. Darash agreed, he is awaiting a call from Windsor. One of the principle figures in Operation America Spring (or, whatever) offered up their 20,000 followers (all are being directed to join NLA).

      Delete
    12. Well, Windsor's got those numbers on facebook easy. Hey, NLA...Windsor's got 39,000 on Facebook. I'm sure he'd be more than happy to hook you up!

      Delete
  25. yep windsor had eugene paulson get arrested.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The NLA lemmings are surfing Lawless America.com. Some how, I don't think NLA's smart meter people, HAARP people, criminals and people with Billbutthurtness* are going to care that most of movie stars are telling fairy tales.

    * (c) Anon 10:33


    Mon, 09/08/2014 - 18:17
    (Reply to #6) #6
    JudgeYoda
    JudgeYoda's picture

    We Want Our Country Back!!! LLA Movie Promo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG38JCJnFpw

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahah!! The guy at the end....wowzers!
      Same lame game, different dictator. End results? Jail! hahahahaha
      Go ahead guys...try and take your country back.

      Delete
    2. The guy at the end, Gregory Scott Goodyear, was arrested 12-21-03 and charged for violation of a protective order. Go figure.

      http://openpasts.com/publicrecord/gregory-goodyear/05075580108811

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04-JVFA9Yf8

      Oh, and he was arrested again as follows:

      1-27-04 violation of PO, 2 counts
      http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/index.php?r=crimeActivity/inmateDetail&id=291710

      2-24-06 failure to appear
      http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/index.php?r=crimeActivity/inmateDetail&id=350631

      04-05-08 driving with expired license
      http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/index.php?r=crimeActivity/inmateDetail&id=439076

      He told his story to Crystal Cox before Bill filmed him
      http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/2011/10/lee-county-conspiracy-gregory-scott.html


      And his brother was arrested too - 7 counts.
      http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/index.php?r=crimeActivity/inmateDetail&id=496723

      Delete
    3. Geeze! What a winner and upstanding spokes person for the "movie" Lawless America Losers on the Loose.

      Crystal Cox the "investigative blogger" is nothing more than a bullshit spreader. That troll wouldn't know how to investigate her way out of a paper bag.

      She writes filth, blackmails those she wrote about and cons them into thinking she will "undo" any damage to their reputations--all except for the part where SHE was the one who damaged it in the first place. I'd bet she is behind much of the trash blogs Windsor is trying to blame on others. That is her MO, and that's what she's been sued over numerous times. That is one dangerous bitch right there. No wonder Windsor loves her. They are two delusional peas in a pod.

      Delete
  27. From the Ellis Co. JOKE-of-a-Civil-Case-Inquiry web page, looks like Billy was quite the vexi litigant yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL $548.00 of vexiness. What a moron! He is spinning at warp speed now.

      Delete
    2. Is the $1000 balance still there?

      Delete
    3. Yes. Any new motions have to paid for up front. That 1000 is just sitting there for contempt/sanctions and other fees the Judge imposes.

      Delete
    4. A few words of encouragement to Bill from the Lawless America Regional Director:

      Marty Prehn
      Bill good luck on the 19th. May they all be found GUILTY and sent to prison for 10 years.
      5 minutes ago

      Delete
    5. Gotta love how clueless Marty is about the 19th. (well, he's pretty clueless about life in general so...scratch that)

      Love how Windsor just leaves them all hanging. So busy being vexi he can't even post a lame news story for them comment their conspiracy stuff on. Hahahahaha

      Delete
    6. Yup. I do wish someone would tell Marty the only issue on which the judge will rule is whether or not to allow the removal of all the green M&Ms from Willy "Wonka" Windsor's candy bowl.

      Delete
  28. Vexatious dolt and his rah rah team.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Mr. Windsor: "This will be the first time that I have ever laid eyes on any of these cyberstalkers."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    Below are excerpts From Bill Windsor's 9/4/2014 Facebook post, where he has cropped himself out of a photograph of him and Renee H., accuses her of being a stalker that he's never met, and fails to mention she was his hard working volunteer public relations person for a while - until she realized [my words not hers] he had gone quite mad. He has deleted the 2012 post from his blog and Facebook that showed the original uncropped photo.
    Renee is a crime victim drawn to him for help and who is trying to avoid her perp (why I'm not reposting her last name here) yet Windsor put where she lives in his post. Renee tells me she has not posted once on this blog and yet Mr. Windsor thinks he has it all figured out. It's hard to not say something mean about his character - but that would violate my own:

    Bill Windsor
    September 4
    "RENEE [H.] TO BE NAMED AS A DEFENDANT IN WINDSOR V. JOEYISALITTLEKID, ET AL... She is believed to be one of the worst of the Joeys. When everything is tallied, she may have published the largest number of individual defamatory statements... On September 19, 2014, a hearing will be held in this case in the 40th Judicial District Court in Waxahachie Texas. It should be interesting. This will be the first time that I have ever laid eyes on any of these cyberstalkers... — in Lansing, MI."

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10204903051962625&set=a.1865609366531.2111583.1429920220

    I have known Renee for years,we mutually blog, and we talked daily during her Windsor days. She believed at first that he was well intended and qualified, she enthusiastically devoted so much of her time and research but was always pushed to do more. From my perspective the relationship had quickly become exploitative, which verified to her what she was feeling.

    I am so sorry to all the people who faced their original injustices and nightmares and now are caught in another grinder if they don't bow down and shut up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that was really the main point in this blog's coverage of Bill was to point out that his intentions were anything but good or well meaning.

      Delete
    2. I have to add, this isn't the first time Windsor has publically posted the name and address of someone in hiding from an abuser. This was the turning point for many DV people who gave Windsor their stories, yet he blasted their personal info out to the world. Only a sick, sadistic monster would re-victimize like he has.

      That little data base he has? With everyone's names, phone numbers, addresses, and god knows what else? What is the purpose? He has used many of the names maliciously in court filings, without cause. Just to be a complete prick. There are some very powerful people--well liked, accomplished, professional people on that list who have not once uttered one word about what an absolute monster Windsor is. Yet, he can simply file some document "with information and belief" or "to the best of my knowledge" and that's it. Trash the reputations of these individuals because he is a delusional asshole. Vindictive, narcissistic, and twisted. It's unimaginable to sane people how he's managed to get this far in life, without being put in a padded room somewhere, away from harming innocent people. Yes, I believe he is that crazy. ***all my opinions, which I am entitled to***

      Delete
    3. Is this the same Renee,( the transexual) ? According to statements made publicly on William Windsor's Facebook page at least. Well, made by the even crazier Nancy anyway.

      Signed, Mike Hi Nan Nan. PPHHHHFFFTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

      Delete
    4. Right, and Windsor leaves those defamatory comments up? Giving the crazyasses a platform to further his attacks on innocent people! This is NOT some innocent little old grandpa, who's being picked on for no reason, this is a dangerous man, who wanted to launch a Revolutionary Party to take over. None of the people who filmed would have ever gotten involved had they known his true intentions. Now they have to be ridiculed, slandered, harassed and defamed by the mentally unstable who hate our Government.

      Delete
    5. Windbag loves to defame people. He's got such a sensitive ego that he can get any real work done on what he claimed to be his goal -- making a movie. If he had stuck to keeping his word, none of the original criticisms would have meant anything, but they are true and valid. 99% of what people complain of regarding bizarre behavior by Willy is true. He is incredibly mentally unstable. He will use anyone who volunteers until they are all used up as he threatens them with a variety of false allegations. He is afraid that someone might take over and actually do something that should have been done with the flawless america project. What he's done is to prove that the courts work, yet not fast enough, when your name is William M. Windsor, abuser. Yes, he looks like a little old grandpa and yes, he's evil and unstable. It's time for the courts to protect his defendant victims.

      Delete
    6. He can't get any real work done and he never intended to be honorable. He was just looking to film people to find their weaknesses so he can prey on them.

      Delete
    7. Im still waiting for my signed copy of "Round America" All I got was a Round American, (who should be deported--somewhere)

      Delete
    8. Im still waiting for my signed copy of "Round America"

      Go to Amazon...the river not the web site.

      Delete
  30. Look out Sean F, the mongoose is coming for ya!!!!

    Careful he might fall on you and smother you to death, well…. Maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Do you see something Bill Windsor has in common with this woman? Big, fat woman who convinced everyone she was going to have quintuplets was never pregnant. 37-year-old Barbara Bienvenue was supposedly pregnant with quintuplets for 34 weeks…supposedly. The mother-to-be fooled her boyfriend, her entire town, and perhaps, maybe even herself.

    http://www.itsybitsysteps.com/expectant-mother-quintuplets-receives-shocking-news-delivery-room-girlfriend-isnt-pregnant/

    There are no babies, I mean there is no movie. Big stories, big build ups, BIG LIES!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And what happens after they can't produce? Pretty odd behaviors from both Bienvenue and Windsor.

      Delete
  32. Please don't perpetuate the mean statements that Mr. Windsor leaves on his page. Renee is no transexual, and if she was she would be the kindest, smartest, most giving transexual that I know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is terrible and I am shocked that Facebook hasn't deleted the post. I am sure numerous people have complained about it. I still don't know why FB doesn't just terminate his Bill Windsor page permanently. It's nothing but hate mongering anyway.

      Delete
    2. Laverne Cox and others like her are good people. Windsor kills his chances of getting very famous and no one of good character wants to defend him or have anything to do with him. There's nothing wrong with being transexual.

      Delete
    3. No one here is perpetuating, or believing that crap for a second. It was a satirical comment. We only make fun of Mr. Wind-snore, and Nancy, well and Marty. But thats all...

      Delete
    4. I'm shocked that FB has left her photo up; I mean it is her photo and it is being used without permission. What a disgrace this Windsor is - smh.

      Delete
    5. I think its his pic of her and since he had everyone sign away their life with his disclaimer.....it might be legal. It just goes to show what that evil monster was really after all along, he wanted something to hold over people to terrorize them.

      Delete
    6. Why are y'all acting so shocked and horrified now? Windsor has been posting pics of people, with identifying information, saying ugly things about them and inciting personal attacks for over a year.

      Delete
    7. You shouldn't be surprised NBTDT. The field of perpetration in bad boy's wake is huge and not every one knows previous people he's called into question for no reason. Wind-snoze has no right to habituate trashing innocent people who have given of themselves for his project. Renee H. has given and given and given. Shame on him.

      Delete
    8. @ 7:16 - Thx. I didn't consider not everyone knows the history. But, helping Bill with his project or not - what he has done to all of the private individuals he's attacked is inexcusable.

      Delete
    9. Yup, I hate Renee's being smeared. Just as I have that Betsi lady, the MVZ woman, & umpteen others Windsor has been CONVINCED "upon information and belief" are the ruination of his nothingness.
      Could be way worse. Could leave that shit up a MONTH about a man killed in a accident, because PussyLala In Fear Windsor got his Facebook privileges revoked for 30 days.
      I cannot wait to see his sorry, pussy, in fear, lying, shaking ass next week in court.
      Eat your Wheaties Windsor. You're gonna need them to haul not only your round ass, but your wheelie cart & all your boxes of plunder. Be sure & say "cheese!" as you search for parking, waddle up to the courtroom, you never know who's snapping photos & videos. You know, like you've done? Yeah. All that sorry shit you've been doing to others? It's going to be done to you. Buckle up, Buttercup, I'm coming, since you were too pussy to come to Kemp and file your "in fear" police report, the chief of police will come there, with me and you can whine all you want. Ponder on that, Windsor. Maybe I'm not the only one going to do some of those same things to you, that you've done.
      I don't shake. I'm not obese. I'm not a pussy. Im in excellent health, no slip & falls, no hernias. I'm not labeled Vextacious, nor have I inundated the courts with BillShit. I'm kinda giddy just thinking of what a foolish idget you're going to make of yourself, all in front of my sons and everyone else in that courtroom.
      See you next week, Windsor, literally see you, up close, eye to eye, if you're 'man' enough.

      #SemperFiWife
      #SemperFiLife
      ~KMc~

      Delete
  33. It would seem to me that once the contact is broken (no movie, he's suing you) that the "right" for Windsor to use a photo ends. In no way would a contract permit Windsor to bully, harass, and defame another individual.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I know he has NBTDT and I've been horrified that a judge has not been able to put a stop to his behavior - yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a good point! Any court can, on their own motion, put a stop to what Windsor is doing and incarcerate him and it's about time that happens. Courts are used to letting litigation drag on and on to benefit the litigators who are making money. Now we are seeing the shortcomings and failings of the court and court abuse in action.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, no - I've got to disagree with 7:22. Abuse of the courts, yes. That is exactly what Windsor is doing, IMO. But it's not about the courts "letting litigation drag on and on", it is about no matter how irritating Windsor's abuse is at the moment he does have the same rights as the rest of us. Most of the parties are pro se, nobody is making money there. The attorneys that are involved appear to be doing their dead level best to get out lickity split. The dragging on and on part is all Windsor and the courts playing by the rules.

      Delete
    3. The attorneys are trying to get out of this case quickly; is that a problem for you?

      Delete
    4. A problem for who? Not me - that was exactly my point in disagreement with statement made at 7:22.

      Delete
    5. Windsor is abusing, the court in Texas is allowing abuse given his vexatious history to clarify at 7:22. We aren't in disagreement at all.

      Delete
    6. I disagree that the TX court is allowing abuse.

      Delete
    7. The court is not allowing the abuse. For example, look at the Facebook case and Facebook's demurrer and how Windsor stopped that. That demurrer would have dismissed Windsor's case. It's not the courts that are allowing this to happen; they have no choice but to take Windsor's motions.

      Delete
    8. We'll see what the Carroll/Texas court does. The Missouri court certainly let his #%!$%^ go on long enough. Thrash's order was specific about first obtaining leave from the FDC in the state wherein he plans to file. Windsor is certainly abusive.

      Delete
  35. http://www.dmlp.org/threats/rakofsky-v-internet

    Just pointing this out… Finally dismissed mostly on jurisdictional grounds. the judge found that someone in NY could not sue bloggers in other states, and Canada, in a NY courtroom.

    Who does this remind me of...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is related to defendants' motion for sanctions.

      http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2013-01-02-Memo%20in%20support%20of%20defendants%27%20motion%20for%20sanctions.pdf

      Delete
    2. @11;58: What you mean is that the judge in THAT case, found that the defendants in THAT case could not be sued in NY. Every case is different.

      Delete
    3. These cases have similar elements.

      Delete
  36. This just in...

    Case CIV526302 - WILLIAM M WINDSOR VS FACEBOOK INC

    HEARING CONTINUED TO 11/26/14 AT 09:00

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To my understanding, it's not a hearing, it's a case management conference. FB asked for this, so perhaps they are waiting for the Judge to review that crappy try of Windsor's to pretend he "complied" with Thrash's order in obtaining leave, when clearly he did not.

      Delete
    2. THE MINUTE ORDERS POSTED TODAY (verbatim):


      CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
      09/18/2014 - 9:00 AM DEPT. 7

      HEARING CONTINUED TO 11/26/14 AT 09:00 IN DEPARTMENT 7.

      Delete
  37. Holy shit, the asshole who scammed me out of 10 extra bucks for boat tickets like 9 years ago and emailed me word salad profanity when I complained not only is still kicking but has been tarding it up on the Internet and hurting people non-stop the whole time.

    I went and read his site. It was just as crazy as I remember him being. Death threats everywhere! Conspiracy! Alphabet Agencies involved!

    ReplyDelete
  38. I enjoy that he's probably scouring his scammed receipts from that era ( Bill Windsor is a fucking thief) for people named Leonard so he can add me to lawsuit #2314 wherein he accuses me of telling the CIA that he sold toddlers bathtub gin or whatever. Hello Billy! Reading this site's backlog is going to be so entertaining.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Billly be sure to add me to your new frivolous lawsuit! I live in WA which gives you a whole new state court system to tard up with your nonsense you worthless asshole loser who scammed me!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.