In past posts, Bill Windsor has been compared to Adolph
Hitler. Given Hitler’s horrific
history, this appears to be an exaggerated comparison. But, it’s important to recognize classic
narcissistic traits and know how the dynamic affects a group of people so that
a history such as Hitler’s is not repeated.
In fact, Hitler has been studied many times by many people for just that
reason.
In 2007 a study on Hitler’s personality was published by the
psychology department at the University of Colorado. The publication is a compilation of expert
opinions formulated through various other studies and a lot of technical data I
don’t begin to understand. Technical data aside, several interesting
points are made. The experts opine
that while there is evidence of mental illness, Hitler’s narcissistic
personality was the major contributor in his ability to control the German
population. More than Hitler’s
psychopathology, it was the social condition of the German people that allowed
Hitler’s rise to power. One expert’s
opinion is that “anyone like Hitler could have accomplished the same heinous
acts…”. Hitler was only the facilitator of the
holocaust; he fanned the flames of nationalism that “contained the seeds of
genocide from centuries of anti-Semitism”.
The publication quotes a study by John D Mayer (1993) in
which Mayer makes a proposal for recognition of a dangerous leader disorder
based on three major behavior categories: indifference, intolerance and grandiosity. Mayer
noted “that dangerous leaders typically have apologists who discount their
destructive methods in favor of viewing their behavior as consonant with
“laudable” goals.” While Mayer’s study
was relative to extreme behavior in preventing international incidents and a
future holocaust, we see some of these behaviors in the leader of Lawless
America:
Indifference towards
peoples suffering: these traits were
exemplified for us in the post “The eyes and lies of Bill Windsor, the narcissist”
with the behaviors that are listed under “Difficulty
with empathy”, “Using other people
without considering the cost of doing so” and “Inability to view the world from
the perspective of other people”.
Intolerance of
criticism: we’ve seen many examples of Bill’s inability
to reconcile criticism, attack those who criticize him, attacks on the friends
of his critics, his inability to admit when he is in error, his rage when he is
challenged and the most glaring evidence of this behavior is being declared a “vexatious
litigant”.
Grandiosity,
manifested by seeing oneself as a “uniter” of people, identification with
religion/nationalism and promulgating a grand plan: Bill Windsor, united victims in all 50 states,
designed and implemented TWO grand plans, Lawless America Association and
Lawless America the Movie, to ‘take our country back’.
Dangerous leaders typically have apologists: comments and posts on Bill’s web sites are typically written by
supporters who minimize, excuse, defend and encourage behaviors that reflect
indifference and intolerance as the grand plans are executed. As
the wheels have come off the Lawless America wagon one by one and stalking
games have taken precedence, the supporters continue to applaud Bill’s efforts
and quietly accept the change in agenda without any apparent awareness that the
activity, if not illegal, is morally wrong.
As Ninja points out
in her post, narcissists need a supply.
Just as Hitler did, Windsor found a supply within a group that has an
inflated view of itself and goals. It operates
as a narcissistic entity. According to a 2009 study “Collective
Narcissism and it’s Social Consequences”, collective is an alternate form of
narcissism where most individual traits apply but the word ‘group’ can be
substituted for ‘self’. A sub concept, The charismatic
leader-follower relationship, theorized by Jerrold post appears to define
Hitler and Windsor. Post theorizes that
there are two types of narcissists within this group, the mirror-hungry
narcissist leader and the ideal-hungry narcissist followers. Post suggests that the relationship is
symbiotic as supply needs are met for both narcissistic types. The mirror-hungry leader receives the
admiration he needs and his charisma provides the followers with the purpose
needed by their ideal-hungry narcissism.
This is where the comparison to Hitler ends. Hitler’s collective narcissism had single
purpose, national and Arian superiority.
In my opinion, if there had been as many different ideals in the
followers of Hitler as there were in Lawless America, Hitler’s army may not
have made it across the border into Poland.