By NBTDT
I was looking at the list of people that provided affidavits
and other documents in support of Bill Windsor for the Missouri case; there are
a lot of unfamiliar names. This raised several questions. Who are these people? How are they connected to Bill? How
long have they known Bill? How well
do they know Bill? Do they know Bill
aside from sitting in front of his camera for an hour? What do they know about Bill other than
what he posts on the internet? When these people approached Bill to be in
the movie, did they expect to become part of a revolution? Or, did they offer their testimony only in
hopes of resolving their own specific issue?
If they weren't active within Lawless America, then why were they motivated
to help Bill in this way? What did
they say about Bill?
I found that most of them gave their “testimony” to
Bill. In the moments when I've had
nothing better to do over the last couple weeks, I watched the videos of the people
on the list and gave Google search engines a good work out in an attempt to
answer some of the questions. The people whose videos are posted fit into
one or more of 5 categories: complaints about child protective agencies,
complaints from people who have been, or are advocating for someone convicted
of a crime, complaints regarding losses in civil court, complaints of elder
abuse, and complaints of government corruption from people who dislike and fight
bureaucracy.
The categories break down according to primary complaint as
follows:
Child Protective Agencies
Total number = 15: 4
people complained that children were removed from the parents due to
accusations of sexual abuse. The other
11 people complained that children were removed due to accusations of physical
abuse or neglect.
Criminal Convictions
Total number = 18: Complaints of judicial and/or law
enforcement corruption in conviction of 6 murders, 3 sexual offences involving
children, 2 for physical abuse of children, 3 for kidnapping, 1 terrorist threat, 2 for
fraud and 1 who did not disclose his crime (he gave his testimony under an
alias). All are claiming
innocence.
Civil Court “corruption”
Total number = 35: Of
these, 8 were for property claims, 27 were complaints of family court
corruption in a divorce and/or child custody case. Of the child custody disputes, 12 involved unsupported
accusations of sexual abuse by one parent against the other, 6 complaints were
either for not receiving enough child support or wrongfully ordered to pay
support and there were 7 unsupported accusations of domestic violence. All of the custody cases involve at least one
accusation against the custodial parent, a few have two. Except for Yevgenia
Shockome. Yevgenia deserves honorable
mention as she hit the
trifecta – she is accusing her ex-husband of sexual abuse, domestic violence
and she is refusing to pay court ordered child support. She is fighting the court order to pay
support in two states. She went to jail
for contempt of court.
Elder Abuse
Total number = 6: All complaints were similar, regarding poor
physical care and liquidation of estates.
Government Corruption
Total number = 19: Complaints regarding
judicial corruption, various government agency corruption and civil rights
violations.
There were 7 people on the affidavit list
not counted in the category break down: 3 were just friends of someone else Bill
filmed, 4 do not appear to have given their testimony to Bill and no connection
to Bill or Lawless America was found in searches.
There are 100 names on the list. Bill
has about 1200 testimonial videos posted and many followers that were not
filmed. Affidavits were publicly
solicited from all of the Lawless America followers. Surely the active and familiar members of
the group responded to Bill’s call for help.
Sharon Anderson responded. But
she’s not included on the list. So why
stop at 100? Why not submit 101
affidavits? Does Bill just like even numbers
or did he cherry pick his supporters? How many other followers responded to Bill’s
call for help but were not chosen? Are
the 4 people not filmed the only real world friends Bill has?
Of the 100 people listed, I recognize 21 names as being
active after the D.C. event last year; 7 have joined up with National Liberty
Alliance, 10 espouse SovCit rhetoric and 3 are conspiracy theorists. My count of active members may be slightly
off, but roughly 79% of the people listed do not appear to be participants in
the Lawless America revolution. This causes me to wonder if the majority of
these people were motivated to assist Bill only for the promise of resolving
their own issues and securing a place in the movie.
As for what these people have said in support of Bill, maybe
the affidavits will be obtained through FOIA or shared once the case is
disposed so that we can judge the credibility and validity of the statements
for ourselves. In the meantime, if the affidavits filed in
Texas are an indicator, I suspect the Missouri court is holding on to 100
worthless pieces of paper.
