Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Windsor Returns from Facebook Suspension


So after getting a 30 day time out on fb for violating their terms of service, Bill has given his few followers a proof of life as he re-emerged with really nothing to tell them.

BILL WINDSOR IS BACK AFTER A 30-DAY FACEBOOK SUSPENSION. back where?

My 30-day suspension from Facebook is up I'm sure it will happen again. I was suspended for posting a photo of a cyberstalker's face no you were suspended for violating the terms of service for facebook....you should know this by now. I wonder if it has anything to do with the lawsuit I have against Facebook no but I'm sure if Facebook were to connect the dots that you are suing them and trying to operate a Facebook page they would do more than just put you in the time out box.

I continue to work more than full-time on my lawsuits I can see, based on your career as a serial entrepreneur how this might seem like real "work" to you against my cyberstalkers ummm, no one is stalking you, no one even cares about you. The evidence is literally overwhelming oh well, maybe you can get a better hold on it next time then...so much of it. I've become a poor man's expert on defamation how many poor men have over $1 million on deposit with Wells Fargo?.

If you are interested in following the "trials" heh...funny you used "" because you know you will never have a real trial and tribulations I'm sure just driving down the street is a "tribulation" for you, checkwww.LawlessAmerica.com. I won't be able to do much of anything on the movie what movie? until my name and reputation get restored after the vicious defamation. you see folks, I can't finish the movie because of all these people who said I wouldn't make a movie.  I know that may not make any sense to you but so what.....I create the narrative 

57 comments:

  1. "until my name and reputation get restored"

    Evergreen excuse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HA! I thought that was his whole guise of making the "movie" in the first place. All those "corrupt Judges and attorneys" who defamed him, called him meanie names, labeled him "vexatious," said he files "frivolous" lawsuits, etc. Hahahahahah oh my!!

      Delete
  2. His reputation was was sunk when he has to retire because of the chapter 7 of 1st
    Communications. Why does he need financing when was paying off 50,000 a month on credit cards per month? Not let alone all the homes. I have read all of the maid of the mist about he was in contempt of court and paid almost 30,000 to the court.

    Bill never answered my challenge to prove the sale of 1st communications to the Washington post. Why? It never occurred. If they did buy it, it was sold in the liquidation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you saying Windsor has paid all his outstanding sanction debt with respect to the MoM case including Duffy's $500/day sanction for non-payment (1 Feb 2013)?

      Delete
    2. They paid last year. They paid it before the divorce. It all on pacer. So as far as mom is concerned it's all over.

      Delete
    3. You aren't making sense Fleming. The contempt or sanctions owed to the court have nothing to do with MOM. Here you say " I have read all of the maid of the mist about he was in contempt of court and paid almost 30,000 to the court."
      Then now you say "They paid it before the divorce. It all on pacer. So as far as mom is concerned it's all over."

      Two separate things. What are you trying to say? Barbara paid the last approx. 100K to MOM, but there was still the outstanding debt of almost 30K owed to the court. You are confusing.

      Delete
  3. "a poor man's expert"

    That's an adjectival phrase; Windsor is not implying he's poor, he's claiming he's an expert to those who are. Of course, his understanding with respect to defamation is woefully lacking, so IMO, it's his expertise that's poor, and not his audience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, and that expert claim ranks right up there with "Grand Jury Consultant".

      Delete
  4. Excuses or no, it's kinda of nice the lemmings are back to give me something else to read up on. This one right here got my attention:

    Kelly Haser Pickens I was just thinking of you yesterday! Hope all is well and you continue to press on for justice! We are not giving up on Support for Hugh- 19 y.o. imprisoned for 40 years on 1st time offense.! xoxo

    First time offense. Sure. First time he got caught - it was his 4th armed robbery. He was also charged with kidnapping. Armed robbery in FL is a capitol felony, Hugh could have been sentenced to life in prison. He plead guilty and took his chances with the judge, who gave him 40 years. His momma said he qualified for the Youthful Offender Program because no one was hurt in the robberies, but sadly no. Youthful offenders guilty of a capitol felony are not eligible for the program.

    http://www.news4jax.com/news/2-Teens-Arrested-On-Robbery-Charges/2038696

    http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/crime/2009-07-20/story/jacksonville_clay_police_arrest_4_in_ortega_area_robberies

    https://www.change.org/petitions/governor-rick-scott-please-commute-hugh-s-sentence

    http://www.flsenate.gov/UserContent/Session/2011/Publications/InterimReports/pdf/2011-114cj.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How about these cogent tidbits?

      "Mary Deneen Children dying from tick and transplacental Lyme-neuroborreliosis complications, my two children remain held hostage from our out of state (ILADS) specialists by MT DCFS and Judge Ted O. Lympus with U of MT Dept of Biological Sciences / Epidemiology retaliation, stalking, harassment, intimidation veiled and vile threats.
      Edited · Like · 1 hour ago
      Mary Deneen MT ACLU, Disability Rights MT, and others, file federal lawsuit against MT State Prison and MT State Mental Hospital for false-fabricated "faking illness" locked in brutal solitary confinement and w other brutal cruel, inhumane, ill treatment, pain, suffering, excessive force and deaths. Read current Complaint filed in federal court at www. Disabilityrightsmt.org
      Like · 1 · 1 hour ago
      Mary Deneen I am victim of above "faking illness" by MT w cruel, inhumane, ill-treatment imprisonment w stalking, harassment and intimidation veiled and vile threats.
      Like · 56 minutes ago"

      Delete
    2. Yep. I was glad to see Mary D is back, still her old self. Funny though, she quit naming Booshie and now says a Judge and U of M Biology dept threatened her. Does Booshie's PO against Bill extend to lemmings now??

      Delete
    3. He certainly brings out the best in people...

      Delete
    4. "Funny though, she quit naming Booshie and now says a Judge and U of M Biology dept threatened her. Does Booshie's PO against Bill extend to lemmings now??"

      She is a true lemming to the core.....Bill can no longer say his name so she adopts the same policy. She doesn't know or care for the why, she follows her master unquestionably

      Delete
    5. This says a lot about our Mental Health system. DHHS should investigate the youtube videos. There are tons of Bill people claiming they were diagnosed with a mental disorder and they are running around un-medicated. Then when they snap, everyone's all, "oh, shitty, didn't see that coming."

      Clearly, following Windsor has aided these people's mental issue, and Mary is a prime example of the deterioration when left un treated.

      Delete
    6. Well, lookie there. I used the wrong capital twice ^^^ and no one called me on it.

      Thank you very much.

      Delete
    7. ROTF - Mary D edited her post. Is she reading us?

      Mary Deneen Children dying from tick and transplacental Lyme-neuroborreliosis complications, my two children remain held hostage from our out of state (ILADS) specialists by MT DCFS and Judge Ted O. Lympus with U of MT Dept of Biological Sciences / Epidemiology retaliation, stalking, harassment, intimidation veiled and vile threats by and thru state-paid employee Sean Boushie.
      4 hours ago · Edited · Like

      Delete
    8. LOL she can edit it 1000x's and it's still mumbled garbage.

      By and through Lawless America with vile and veiled threats from Windsor / holding hostage said "haters" by lawsuits by and through again retaliation, stalking, harassment, intimidation blah, blah, blah!

      Delete
    9. Yep, but she got real clear again about who harassed her.


      @ Mary: you go girl! Call him out. Loud.

      Delete
  5. "Bill Windsor-- Thanks, folks. It's nice to see 46 Likes. The cyberstalkers have published that I have no friends and only a dozen people who read here."

    WOW! Not sure what to say about that comment. It's just so full of funniness and also sadness. Is it funnier that he calls FB people "friends" or that he is happy there are 46? Or is it really just sad that these people are hanging on in hopes he comes through with his promises to fix all their problems? I think I am going with sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe he's finally getting a return on the friends he bought...

      Delete
    2. did he not see the picture posted under the previous article?

      Delete
    3. LMAO Ginger! I thought the same thing.

      Delete
    4. LMAO

      Yeah, Bill kinda drives that point home re: the pic on the last post.

      Delete
  6. Why yes Bill, why don't you for ONCE answer poor Gail??? She's been asking you the same question for ever. You clearly mislead her into thinking you'd help her in some way (like all of the others) at least you could take two seconds away from your egotistical, tyrannical, dictatorial, stalking/suing fest to answer this woman.

    "Gail Schumacher Hi Bill---Before I leave Facebook again can I ask what is going on with CPS? I don't want to hang in here on Facebook. I just get in here generally to see what my kids profile pictures are since they aren't talking to me.
    a few seconds ago"

    Figured I'd try to help, since he reads here more than his own FB page!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG really Windsor? You reply to the people above poor Gail, and ignore here again? WOW you are such a narcissist.

      Delete
    2. Nope, still no reply to poor Gail, but to solidify the narcissist point he did reply to this guy who complimented that POS Cop jalopy he thought was the business.

      "Bill Windsor Leonard, I wish I still had the 55 Chevy. That's an old photo. That car was fantastic"

      Delete
  7. Yeah. Bill, get back on track. Don't argue with Yvonne and Cynthia, they really do know what's best for you.

    Cynthia Elias Bill, public awareness by putting out your movie was your original objective. Mel Gibson was attacked and destroyed after he put out Passion of the Christ in retaliation. He still succeeded in getting his movie out and affected the masses. I am afraid that your objective got derailed by evil that intends to prevent your movie from coming out by attacking your reputation. Now your ego is clogged up in defending itself in Courts that could have been the source of these defamations in the first place. I fear you are now stuck in a never ending cycle of defending your ego (honor) instead of a larger purpose of defending children and unsuspecting parents exploited and sold by the system. Defamation of character is corruption's chief dark weapon...this is the heart of enslavement and sad to say you like everyone else have been unwittingly caught up. You could potentially be the hero by getting back on track and seek to rescue instead our children and American system instead and let your movie stand as the truth. I will pray for you...here is the formula for those of us on the good side...the more defamation gets thrown at you, the more of something of real value you have...people are going to move on to find another hero...exposer of the truth because we are in urgent situation and do not have much time. Prayers and love.
    about an hour ago · Like · 2

    I would post Bill's argument, but we've read it aaaaall before. Bottom line: He has no other choice but to stalk and sue people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact of the matter is, Windsor has a clear and irrefutable history of incomplete projects--from his memoir on the MoM case, "Screwed, Glued and Tattooed", to this travel book, "Round America", the inference his LA movie will remain unfinished is as obvious as a streaker at the Super Bowl.

      Delete
    2. Clearly the "defamation" isn't as bad as Windsor wants the lemmings to believe. I mean, if they haven't a clue other than what he keeps telling them, then it's not the "worlds worst defamation case in history" or what ever he said.

      It is laughable. I mean, here he is still trying to hammer home this point that he can't help them like he promised because of such horrific events EXCEPT they don't know anything about it other than what he is telling them. It's not about the "haters", it's about Windsor's need to figure out how to get out of what he promised them, that he never intended on doing in the first place. (oh, and making a name for himself. That has always been a top priority for him.)

      Delete
    3. Oh here is a Freudian slip from Windsor. Yes, yes you did cost yourself-- Windsor!!

      "I has cost me my wife and my family as well as over $150,000 that I have spent in production."

      Delete
    4. So what's the reason for no Sunday night TalkShoes while the courts are closed?

      Delete
  8. Bill is not Mel Gibson. All his movie is so e political propaganda film to get people to join his cause. He says today he needs to get to the juries. I am thinking about writing a book about my observations of lawless america which would include windsor. I could name it lawless america the movement that never moved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Constipated movement.

      Delete
  9. He takes more "Selfies" than a teenage prom queen.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Attention, some people are off the hook now and don't have to worry. Bill says' " I conducted a little experiment, and when people saw the Facebook pages set up in the names of my deceased parents (father in his coffin and a stack of bones with a wig as their photos), they were totally outraged." He has admitted to setting those pages up.

    Interesting, Along with this fact... he says, "I'd probably be lucky to be allowed top pay and watch a movie at this point, much less get one finished and in the theaters. I has cost me my wife and my family as well as over $150,000 that I have spent in production." This is great. He just admitted to Barbara also paying for the movie aka known as the lawless America Movie. He goes on to say, "it's mighty personal".

    Now we know the entire family is involved. Thanks Bill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think you get his way with words

      Delete
    2. Sean, in the first part he is saying that he showed the fb pages to random people and they didn't think it was funny

      The second part he is not saying his family was culpable just that they got tired of his drama

      Delete
  11. "But it now seems like the cyberstalking and efforts to stop the movie will need to be part of it."

    There goes Marty's 45 minutes. Who else is going to be on the editing room floor?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, poor Windsor! He's cyber stalked alright. He chooses random people, ASSumes that they even know of him, much less give a rat'sfurry shit about him & then he blasts their photos, phone numbers, addresses, employers info anywhere he can, yet he's being cyber stalked.
      He drives from state to state, circling the homes of people he has deemed his haters, but he's being stalked.
      He blatantly lies EVERYTIME he makes a post.
      He ignores his most faithful followers, while licking up to any commenter that compliments him.
      And? Nailed him on the #selfies! Teen girls don't whine, post as many selfies, update their statuses or get grounded from Facebook as much as Windsor does.
      He's a regular diamond in a goat's ass.
      Between he & Aagent DoucheCanoe aka the MongMoose? It's a toss up which is the most comical, bigger liar, or most delusional. They're a perfect duo! Too bad Windsor finds the MongMoose so far beneath him, about as low on the Windsor list as MaryD & Denice. #unworthyofhisattention #sendaffidavitthough #lemminglifers

      That's Windsor's high point for the past 29 days, he's allowed back on the social media site he's suing!

      #twatwaffle

      Delete
    2. "The " Movie" will no longer be about corrupt government, it'll be about people who disagree with me.

      And it won't star any of you, but yours truly."

      Delete
    3. "Have a nice life. Be sure to like me on Facebook."

      Delete
    4. He wouldn't ever think of others & wish them to "have a nice life"! He could care less about them.
      The "Be sure to like me on Facebook"? Definitely Windsor self marketing/promotion! Add a selfie, a big whopping tale of woe about how he's whipping legal ass & Viola! #SameWindsorShizzleNewVexiDay
      #lemmingliferslobethatshizzle #stalktilhedrops #selfiesnapper #twatwaffle

      Delete
  12. LOL - Bill might have a hard time beating down that "limited public figure" status if his lemmings keep posting these kind of comments.

    Annegret James Rouse Every person in the public eye has people who hate them and tell lies about them it is a sad part of life. The more you grow in exposure the more you will be questioned for your actions and activities. People can judge but why would you chose to let their actions stop you from doing what you were doing, with an issue such as Lawless America controversy and hate a thousandfold was to be expected. However I wish you success in your plans, good health, happiness and good fortune Bill, TIPI TIPI Turtle Island Project Innocence and like i said i might not understand your path but i wish you success travelling it
    5 hours ago · Like

    ReplyDelete
  13. She said "i might not understand your path." I think that sums up the majority of the lemmings feelings. They think what he is doing is stupid, and it is. He is contradicting their entire stance. It was his choice to stop, no one elses. He made a conscious decision to highlight the views and opinions of people who disagree with him.

    If he thinks a few bloggers are against what he's doing, he won't like what happens if he makes his little "movie." The majority of the stories have been researched and found to lack credibility and merit. That is also his fault. He didn't vet anyone. Does he really expect people to simply take his word? Not gonna happen. He will be more than likely sued endlessly by the other sides of those stories who have the law on their side, and orders to back them up. Just like Windsor can't handle the truth that he got caught selling tickets after he was told to stop, couldn't see that the law was not going to back him up. He was wrong. Period. Just because he didn't like it, doesn't mean he was "done wrong." The faster these people understand that in their own cases, the better off they will be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those videos and the phantom movie are just slanderous propaganda by proxy.

      Delete
  14. It's not surprising that Windsor relies so much on fake name Julia Fletcher, real name Marlene Debek to give him names of "haters" to sue. She was convicted of making false allegations and ordered to pay over 2 million in a malicious prosecution case. Clearly she has a history of giving false information to cause innocent people pain and suffering. Anyone who has been named by Windsor (falsely) should name Marlene Debek as one of the co-conspirators of Windsors sleuthing group.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill Windsor
      Julia, do we know that Julia Focker is Lorraine Tipton? Do you know who Dontae Givafuque is?
      Like · 1 · 27 minutes ago

      Delete
    2. Anyone know anything about Jeff--the fellow who Billy claimed fixed the lawlessamerica.com site? Recall Billy had advertised on Craig's List for a Joomla! guru to volunteer to fix the site (for a mention in the movie). I wonder if Billy actually paid for Jeff--which would be a departure from Billy's usual MO--to take advantage of the kindness of others. The fact is, generally speaking, Billy's a veritable Scarlet No-Hair-ah!

      Delete
    3. No! Say it isn't so!
      Julia? Praying continuously Julia? She's NOT Julia? She's *gasp* a lying, POS, false accuser?
      But, but, but, she's praying!!!!!!

      ***faints***
      #lemminglifer #TakeAKnee #Amen

      Delete
    4. AJAI BHATIA v. MARLENE DEBEK, SC 18000

      Judicial District of Middlesex

      Malicious Prosecution; Whether Defendant is Entitled to Statutory or Common Law Immunity on Malicious Prosecution Claim Because she Reported Suspected Child Abuse of her Daughter in Good Faith; Whether Evidence was Sufficient to Support Trial Court's Finding that Defendant was Liable for Malicious Prosecution; Whether Evidence was Sufficient to Support Award of Damages. The parties are the unmarried parents of their daughter, T.B., born on August 22, 1996. In late 2000, the father, Ajai Bhatia (Bhatia), brought suit against the mother, Marlene Debek (Debek), seeking joint legal custody of T.B. In the midst of the custody action, Debek made complaints to the department of children and families (DCF) and the police alleging that Bhatia had sexually molested T.B. Soon thereafter, the defendant was charged with sexual assault and risk of injury to a minor. A jury acquitted Bhatia on the sexual assault charge, and the risk of injury charge was later dismissed by the court. Subsequently, Bhatia brought this action against Debek, alleging claims for malicious prosecution and emotional distress. The trial court noted that, in the custody case, Judge Munro issued a decision in which she removed T.B. from Debek's custody. In that decision, Judge Munro found that Debek's story about T.B.'s claim of molestation was not credible and that Bhatia never molested T.B. Noting that it was bound by Judge Munro's findings as her decision was never appealed, the court concluded that Debek was liable for malicious prosecution, ruling that Debek instigated the criminal case against Bhatia without probable cause and that she did so with malice. The court awarded Bhatia $634,500 in economic damages, which included attorney's fees expended in the criminal case and loss of earnings, and $2,500,000 in noneconomic damages for emotional distress. Additionally, the court awarded Bhatia $410,000 in common law punitive damages. On appeal, Debek claims, inter alia, that because she was acting in good faith when she reported the suspected abuse of T.B., she is entitled to statutory immunity pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-101e (b), which shields "[a]ny person" from liability when, in good faith, he or she reports suspected abuse or neglect to DCF or, alternatively, immunity under Connecticut common law. Debek also contends that the trial court erred in finding her liable for malicious prosecution because Bhatia failed to prove any of the elements required to establish such a claim. Lastly, Debek claims that the damages award is not supported by the evidence.
      http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/summaries/docket/18000.htm

      Delete
    5. RED FLAG. Allegations of abuse arose after the father sought joint legal custody. No mention of suspected or alleged "abuse" prior to. None.

      This bitch was so vindictive, manipulative and hateful, the father chose to protect the child from the mothers poisonous slander, and relinquished his parental rights. Now that is proof to me, that he loved that child more than Debitch ever could. There was no evidence to support her claims of abuse, and he could have been awarded full custody, but he knew that child would be used as a weapon by a complete hateful bitch. (She is the prime example of why women and children with actual abuse claims are not believed now) I hope the child will look for her father one day.

      Delete
    6. Seems only the guilty, or the liars stick with Windsor, and he really relies on them. (Two more Debitch links)

      http://articles.courant.com/2005-03-07/news/0503070309_1_child-welfare-abuse-custody-rights

      http://www.indianewengland.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=1EE73D5D9EC04C44973EA1E0989B4FD5&AudID=Restaurants%20%26%20Dining

      Delete
    7. I am really having a hard time figuring out how it is that Julia Fletcher AKA Marlene Debek has managed to run the blog "Family Courts in America" promoting stories from all the advocates that Windsor has labeled "Haters" and targeted along with the arch nemeses of Janice Levinson. WTH is up with that? I mean, the only two still flailing around with Windsor are Marlene and Janass. So why would these others put themselves in direct line of fire for Windsor's tantrums? Rhetorical of course.

      Delete
  15. If Bill wanted to improve his reputation he'd pitch some Venture Capital Groups with a business plan and go forward. That being said he can't, he is a train wreck of a "serial entrepreneur", so his back up (after failing as a grass roots activist attacking the judicial system) is to sue everyone he can, since even a blind pig occasionally finds an acorn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor is always a day late and several donated dollars short. Instead of being all butt hurt about meanie words and names, he could have capitalized on it like Jimmy Kimmel did with his "Mean Tweets" series, and made some funny videos.

      Delete