Thursday, May 22, 2014

National Liberty Alliance Faces the "Now What" Phase


With the Me the People movement suffering another embarrassing turnout in their latest ploy to "take their country back" called Operation American Spring, John Darash continues to struggle to plug all the holes in his sinking ship that is the NLA.  Infighting, moving dates, lack of funding and the inability to get any court to notice their existence has Darash on the brink of irrelevancy.  He still says they are on for June 2nd in a Fed court in NY, but he is becoming increasingly worried that they may never get their foot in the door.  Darash penned this letter as he feels the pressure building:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/14-05-20%20letter%20to%20Federal%20Judge_0.pdf

They were able to at least get a file number for this case:

Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury v. Lippman et al

Date Filed: May 09, 2014
Nature of suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Assigned to: Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
Case in other court: NYS Supreme Court, Greene County, 14-00384
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury demand: None
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel

Docket Proceedings
Req # Filed # Docket Text
1 May 09, 2014 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York State Supreme Court, Greene County, case number 14-0384 (Filed over the counter, in Albany, NY with no fee paid and no IFP application filed) filed by Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)
2 May 09, 2014 2 NOTICE of FILE ON DEMAND by Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury (tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)
3 May 16, 2014 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed on 5/16/14 (tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)


Wait what?  They filed it but didn't pay the fee?  So they pulled a Windsor?  Just in case this goes the wrong way and the court might want to use their jurisdiction over them they think they can claim "oh wait we never paid the fee, never-mind".  This shows exactly what this is all about.....same as Bill, they are just playing games.

Then we have Darash and the NLA embracing, while rejecting, their domestic terrorist status:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/14-05-20%20Information_0.pdf

Interesting that they correctly identify their main problems with the letter topic headlines of "Conspiracy Theorist, Domestic Terrorist, and Mental Disorders".  That kinda sums up the NLA (new lawless america). They go on to say:  
"If these false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other legal documents lack
sound factual basis why aren't they just defeated in a court of law, the reason they cannot is
because of the fiction of equity courts, that corporatists have been using to fleece the People for
over a hundred years, and now that the People discovered how to use the equity courts of fiction
to get justice from the judges and lawyers that have been making a fortune at this fraud, now cry
foul when their own tactics are used against them."

Please stop calling us Sovereign Citizens or domestic terrorists even though we fully support what they are trying to do and how they are doing it, not to mention that we are doing it ourselves.  We prefer to be called patriots or The People thank you very much.  Any other label is considered harassment (defamation for Bill). Me the People desire a free country where everyone is free to say and do whatever they want....as long as they approve.

135 comments:

  1. GRAND JURY MEETING:
    If you know people in Grand Rapids or Kalamazoo, if you could call them and get
    commitments to be there...Please contact anyone you know in, St Joes, Kzoo,
    Calhoon, and Branch... Or any other counties in lower west part of the state....

    NOTICE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT – We the People will be holding an election for
    the reinstating of the Common Law Grand Jury here in South Haven at the South
    Haven Memorial Library, 314 Broadway St., South Haven, MI. 49090
    on Thursday, May 22, 2014 at 6:30 PM.

    There will be a 35 min Presentation starting at 6:30 PM and a vote by showing of
    hands will be at approximately 7:05 PM. All participants will then be invited to
    register for the Common Law Grand Jury

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anyone who wants to talk about your disappointment with lawless America, Bill Windsor, and the Revolutionary Movement. How it fizzled out and provide an update about your situation how it maybe the same after the lawless movement email me at this google address. We can put you on YouTube as an update video. You can be in the new YouTube series theslanderers or help me come up with a better name for it. Soon look for theslanderers.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is such a fabulous blog. Great work!!! Are there any similar blogs that would interest me. Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another great place http://www.thefogbow.com/

    ReplyDelete
  5. My, my, my. This is posted on NLA. At first LMAO at the shirt, thinking I like the cover pic better ^^^. But gets scary at the very end.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWqXTgsgW-M#t=44

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, that is pretty scary. It's the underlying inference that leaves the impressions of something sinister is being planned. It's just like Windsor and his charging everyone under the sun with Treason. He knows damn well what he said he believes should happen when people are charged with Treason. There is no other way to side step it or pretend he never implied in the same breath, death. All of them are out of control and it's beyond sickening the semantics games they all play when cornered on the "what next."

      Windsor is an asshole. Plain and simple. He had a big mouth, and a bigger ego so he riled everyone up, got them to donate and or follow him, then he panicked because he didn't have a plan for the "what next" part. So, he improvised to divert attention from himself and on to "haters" that he could still use to promote himself as a "victim." Let us not forget this is the man who physically went to peoples homes, places of work, favorite restaurants, towns, etc. All after posting about the gun he bought for protection from 'too many crazies' (all another inference without a direct statement) filming, photographing, and posting about it. This is no victim. This is a seemingly unstable man on a mission to harass, annoy, threaten, stalk, and intimidate people he doesn't like. Period. It is just a matter of time before he is on to his "Now what" again phase.

      Delete
  6. LMAO- I love the scribbled signature on the letter...and the lack of any name under the signature line - OMG, and the 'we called the court and was informed' (paraphrased). Don't these people proof-read?

    Yeah, they want to control the people, without benefit of any election by the rest of the people. SMH

    ReplyDelete
  7. Let me go into more detail, I was the one who approached Bill Windsor in late '99, I was a Director at Westech at the time, my wife was the Operations Director. My company (Westech) was the biggest company in this space, and we were both the best at what we did. My wife and I made 300k in 1999. Bill's Co was a distant second.

    We wanted out of CA, so Bill paid me 100K as the SR, VP and my wife Diane 70K as VP of Op's, a huge drop, but we had cash from CA so we accepted, and we had two small children..

    Things went well I launched a publication that was profitable, we added on people from my old company, launched new markets, etc..

    My Mother sold her house that she had lived in for 20 years, to live with us.

    11 Months later I was informed that we were resold to the company I left, and apparently, per Joan and Tim at BrassRing, this was his plan, take the best and leverage them for a sale. He let me buy a house, have my mother sell her house that she'd lived in for 30 years, to join us....,My mother died shortly after relocating her again (from Cleveland to VA) down here.

    We sold our house in Cleveland and bought another in Virginia, but to this day I remember Bill Windsor, and how he was disliked by the staff at 1-Jobs (First Communications) He actually took pics of the staff packing their offices up, being terminated, as many were crying, for his scrap book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you should tell us about how first communications went into chapter 7 bankruptcy and owed the irs over 1 million dollars

      Delete
    2. do you also know about the trademark case westech vs. first commiunications

      Delete
    3. You are talking about two companies that haven't existed in over a decade.

      Delete
    4. Right. Windsor states first communications was sold to the Washington post. I looked at all the Washington post filed 10k at the SEC and there is no mention at all of them buying first communications or any company held by first.

      Was your story at westech and first like this http://youtu.be/sWiSFwZJXwE


      Delete
  8. And Sean, I'd lay off the Chapter 7 stuff, that's not how it was, trust me. So much bad stuff, but that's not the situation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like Windsor has always screwed people over, mislead them, tricked them, or flat out lied to them to turn a profit for himself his entire life. As sickening as it is to read, it's not surprising considering what he is doing to people now.

      Delete
  9. Well, Jon Roland did comment on this blog. If Bill is going to name everyone that posted here, Jon should be listed too. Right? And Marty.

    Sharon Anderson Jon Roland is NOT A HARRASSER check your work http://candidates.sos.state.mn.us/CandidateFilingImageVie...
    16 hours ago · Like

    Bill Windsor Sharon, it's a bogus name of "Jay" Roland, not Jon.
    15 hours ago · Like

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is absolutely ridiculous for him to be asking for information on screen names when he hasn't specified the comments each person made in which he believes need corrections and retractions. I'd love to know what I said that defamed him.

      My opinions about him are my opinions. And my opinion of him requesting information about names is for the sole purpose of harassing everyone for having an opinion about him that he disagrees with. Over a year later and he's still asking his followers to hunt down (stalk via internet) and give him the real names. Again, not knowing or having an ounce of proof that the names he's being given are even right. He is so one sided, being able to have a .com to trash the names of people he only "suspects" or "upon information and belief" which is a crock of crap excuse for "I have no fricken idea, but I want to be vindictive".

      Delete
    2. I agree, Ninja. I'd love to know what I said that Bill considers defamatory. If he'd be specific, I'd review my post + the facts to issue a correction or retraction if I posted an error.

      And after I posted the comments from his FB page, I realized that I don't recall any posts on this blog under the name Jay Roland. There are several others on his latest list that have not posted here. IN MY OPINION, Bill's latest list is just puffery, another attempt to intimidate people into silence because he's got nothing else to do, ever.

      Delete
    3. Tanning. He looks like he's been tanning in his off time. You know, a little pool time in between frivolous filings, random letters to attorneys, writs insulting Judges, and scanning FB, blogs and emails for "haters" to add.

      Delete
    4. "Again, not knowing or having an ounce of proof that the names he's being given are even right."

      What annoys me every bit as much as Bill posting names he's been given are the people that have given Bill names. I know with absolute certainty two of the names listed never contacted Bill or wrote about him. I also know with absolute certainty who was involved with providing Bill with information, which was done only for the purpose of harassment and bully by proxy. I hope there is a special place on the Karma bus for each of them.

      Here is one of the lying sacks of do-do right here - in additional denying that he ever sent e-mails to and harassed Bill, this is from Booshie's 2/18/14 response to Bill's complaint in the MT District Court (sorry that I don't know how to do tinypics to attach the doc). I don't want Bill to win in any court, but I want him to lose fairly and not because Booshie got away with deception and lies.

      XI. Defendant has no ownership, partnership, authority or connection to
      joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com, or any other websites or blogs in any form as
      alleged by the plaintiff.

      Delete
    5. It doesn't even look like tanning bed tan. He looks like he got sprayed and they got a lil over zealous with the sprayer. Gross. Everything about this guy is ridiculous.

      Delete
  10. And the plot thickens...NLA web site is down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dramatic scene:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8Kyi0WNg40

      Delete
    2. LMAO.

      Yeah, the Monday night show had a glitch - Darash just dropped off line in mid sentence. When he came back on, he indicated the government must have found a way to "dink" with them. If Darash didn't take the web site off line, I'm sure there will be an accusation against the government.

      Delete
    3. LOL it's always so amusing when those conspiracy peeps encounter the normal glitches of the wonderful internet, and come up with a way to blame the government.

      I was on the phone, and my call dropped. My first instinct was that Verizon sucks. Not that maybe I was saying something the government didn't like. Hahahaha oh, so funny.

      Delete
  11. Here is a question. If Windsor claims that he never implied Citizen Grand Juries were the end all send all, then why do his lemmings keep posting links, letters, articles, etc all about their special formed Grand Juries, citizen grand juries, or how ever they want to say 'our very own made up by all our own people grand juries?'

    Clearly they all understood the same things we've been saying he said, that he says he didn't say now. Even Sharon Anderson has an article about Citizen Grand Juries tying Windsor in. I don't get it. I don't understand how he thinks he can un-say what he said, wrote, implied, or inferred.

    ReplyDelete

  12. Bill Windsor
    11 minutes ago ·
    REPORT OUT OF NEW YORK THAT BILL WINDSOR IS DEAD AND AUTHORITIES CANNOT LOCATE HIS BODY ARE FALSE

    While I am sure the Joeys and their friends wish I was dead, I am very much alive.

    It is amazing what comes out of the woodwork.

    Someone just sent me a posting from Joeyisalittlekid by a former employee named Paul who lies about the sale of a business in Cleveland. I bought and sold a number of businesses in Cleveland. There was never any plan to hire some people and then sell the company to their former employer; their former employer made an offer, and it was accepted. The employees were not crying, and I was not disliked by the employees. Paul, issue an immediate correction and retraction, or I shall do my best to see you as a defendant in Waxahachie, Texas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, what report out of New York? And what does that have to do with "Paul's" post or this blog? Was the headline an attention grabber, like the ones saying the Constitution is dead and his life was threatened?

      Delete
    2. Maybe Paul will give an interview to the my new weekly show the slanderers at www.theslanderes.com Maybe he can make an affidavit about the First Communications as a historical and accurate tale of the falling of First Communications even though I obtain my initial info that First Communications was liquidated under chapter 7 from a former employee there. A high ranking one.

      Delete
    3. He is just being the typical bully he is. I am sure one day he will meet his match.

      Delete
    4. "There was never any plan to hire some people and then sell the company to their former employer; their former employer made an offer, and it was accepted. The employees were not crying, and I was not disliked by the employees."

      Ah, but there was always a plan to sell the company. And according to Terrence Grogan there were employee morale problems and Bill did not inform employees that the business was offered for sale. When employees like the boss, there usually aren't any morale problems.

      "We weren’t privy to the corporate direction or why things were happening,” Grogan recalls of his time under 1st Communications ownership. “Sometimes, the unknown can be more disturbing than the known, even if the known is bad.”

      "Both Geisler and Grogan experienced the “surprise” of learning their groups were again for sale. “One day I got a call from Bill (Windsor), who said, ‘Meet me in Cleveland, we’re going to New York,” says Grogan. “When we sat down on the plane, he told me we were going to New York to talk with prospective buyers. It was the first I’d heard about it.”

      “We experienced a lot of morale problems because no one knew what was happening or what the plans were,” Grogan says of PTS’ third year under 1st Communications. “Later, when Bill (Windsor) first announced they were looking for a buyer, it was a shock..."

      http://www.expoweb.com/article/driven-by-equity-owners/

      Delete
    5. HAHAHAHA!! Got to love the internet foot print! Great find NBTDT. I just get all giddy when there is substantial proof posted here to refute all the garbage Windsor spews. It's his perception of things that completely lacks any human emotion for others. He has zero compassion for anyone IMO and that article clearly proves it, along with his standard "that never happened" crap!

      I also like the part where Windsor told him basically that he didn't want to tell him his plans to see, because he just wanted him to focus on running the company. Yep, Bill's bottom line is the almighty dollar. Nothing more. Don't care about those little people actually making it though.

      Delete
    6. *his plans to sell.

      Delete
    7. Paul here, I'm not here to get into the weeds on this, I came across this blog seeing where some of my former collegues are today. This is my last post, I have a life Billl, and everything I said is factually true, You know it and the nice thing is you need to prove what I said is false. Depo Deb Bessemer, James Sale, Tim Walker, Joan Sills, Peggy Labo, be my guest.

      I'm probably the only one that's visited this blog from that era, but please, bring them all into this, I'm telling the truth and you know it. As I said, I think this contributed to my mothers death uprooting her from the home of 28 years to tell her we were moving back to the state she just came from months learlier and she fell apart. You can deposition her Dr's as well I suppose.

      I haven't read but two other posts on this blog, so I don't know what others have said, but if you actually intend to sue me, be my guest, "The accused stated the employees didn't like me, but they did even as I laid them off"

      I hereby award the plantiff 1 Million Dollars.

      Delete
    8. And not to stick up for Bill, I found out about the sale the same day as everyone else, and I was Sr. VP/GM, alot of secrecy there, but I know all the players at Brassring and it was an announced sale in Jan ( I believe) of 2001.

      Bill and unofficially, his wife Barbara, are the only two I reported to, but Brassring did purchase First Communications.

      Delete
    9. Here I get going, who are you getting statements from about liking you, all the VP's that reported to me that last year? I heard Greg (former VP) in Seattle may not have been that nice about your Donut Idea, Terri, Lynda, Diane, Robert, I mean come on, they reported to me I heard it all and delt with it, did you think your employees would knock on your corner office and say Bill, if you have a minute......."you suck?" You weren't liked, sorry to be the harbinger of bad news!

      You weren't discussing selling with Pres. Joan? Really? Pres. Deb Really? Depo them.............Tim was doing due diligence. BTW, If you provide more of my contact info., that really would be a mistake.

      I don't know who's blog this is, but you know me, I call this a truce, start posting about me and as I said, I do alot of web now, having another adversary might not be wise. I can't understand why these people aren't suing you.

      Delete
    10. I speak only for myself... I'm not suing him because seeing who he is and what he chooses to do for pleasure, suing him would be pleasurable to him. He'd thrive off of it, being wrapped up in another lawsuit, one where he can all the more falsely claim he's a victim, whining to his followers to get hem riled into feeding frenzies of "poor Bill, we're rootin' for you's!" Lawsuits are Windsor's drug, and I have no interest in supplying him with more drugs. Besides, it's obvious he's close to O.D.-ing on his own, so chances are it won't be long before he's forced to stop this nonsense.

      Delete
  13. He's implying that the authorities would even want to look...

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fact check Bill has no ip addresses from facebook. I call the bs flag here. I'm starting to feel cyberstalked by bill and his clan just for having an opinion. Guess what also the same group michigan from bills group has now joined the NLA

      Delete
  15. Bill Windsor
    LET THE CYBERSTALKERS BEWARE!

    Beware that every single cyberstalker who I can identify will be sued and exposed for the world to see.

    We have a crisis of dishonesty in America, and lying lowlife people need to be exposed. I will do everything humanly possible to see that happen.

    I have already received two batches of IP addresses - one from Google and one from from Facebook, and a request for production of documents is now in their hands. Beginning June 2, depositions are being held. Subpoenas are going to Internet Service Providers, email providers, and others.

    Since the Joeyisalittlekid hate site has defaulted in my lawsuit against them, I hope to soon own that site along with all the IP addresses.

    When the cyberstalking and defamation of me began, I politely told those doing it that they should stop, or I would pursue them, expose them, sue them, and report them for any crimes they commit. I wasn't teasing then, and I'm not teasing now.

    If you have cyberstalked and defamed me, you should issue a correction and retraction for each and every false and/or defamatory statement. You should contact me at nobodies@att.net. I am willing to release one or two people who can identify many of the Joeys and American Mothers Pity Party members. This is your chance to avoid liability for what could be a record-setting defamation award that you may be held jointly and severally liable for.

    So, Caveat Cyberstalkers.

    This photo and every photo taken by Bill Windsor or Lawless America is Copyright, 2014, William M. Windsor.
    — at Utah

    How do you default on a lawsuit that has been stayed? He's sooooo full of shit it's hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ***Feet stomping, red face***
      I"M THE BIG BAD WOLF (IE WILLIE WINDSOR), I'M GONNA HUFF, & PUFF & BLOW YOUR BLOG DOWN.
      **Eye twitching, hands shaking***

      He needs a 730 stat!! 5150!! yikes!!

      Delete
    2. Bahahahaha OMG broken record! How many times has he claimed Google and Facebook gave him names now? That those spiffy subpoena's he sent out were honored? Uh, NO! They were not. The case was stayed almost instantaneously. The only deposition he's got going is with Allie. Not deposition(S)

      It sounds more like he's pissed off that the sleuths have let him down, and he might be paying big ol' Windsor bucks out pretty soon. In fact, I would be that is more the case. Public type figure boy blew it, and now he's gonna pay.

      Delete
    3. "... lying lowlife people need to be exposed."
      Eh, I think that is his issue. He was exposed and he doesn't like it.

      Delete
    4. Defaulted? Bill is going to this site AND IP's? There is somebody that can name "many Joeys"?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLsEcljjYYo

      Delete
    5. Ah yes So, because the TX case is stayed, seems he attempted to send FB subpoenas using the MO case instead. But oopsie:

      " Subpoena Requested
      Pro Se Plaintiff files Request for Subpoena to Facebook, Inc. (Clerks Note: Request cannot be honored due to non-compliance.) Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR

      Master Manipulator hard at work. When one court says no, use the others!

      Delete
  16. Bill are you trying to black mail us again. Not cool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd say it's extortion, rather than blackmail. But it's very similar.

      "Many states combine the crimes of extortion and blackmail under one general law. In California, for example, the applicable statute is known as the California Extortion and Blackmail Law. Under this law, anyone who threatens an individual with the use of force (extortion) or threatens to reveal damaging information about a person or his family members is guilty of a crime. Under California law, extortion or blackmail are graded as felonies and are punishable by up to four years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000."

      Delete
    2. Well add that there "crime" to the list of shit he says he hasn't done. Sure would be nice if he got the 4 year vacation he needs so desperately.

      Delete
    3. TX consolidates extortion, blackmail and theft - TX Penal Code Title 17 Chapter 31.02

      Sec. 31.02. CONSOLIDATION OF THEFT OFFENSES. Theft as defined in Section 31.03 constitutes a single offense superseding the separate offenses previously known as theft, theft by false pretext, conversion by a bailee, theft from the person, shoplifting, acquisition of property by threat, swindling, swindling by worthless check, embezzlement, extortion, receiving or concealing embezzled property, and receiving or concealing stolen property.

      http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/SOTWDocs/PE/htm/PE.31.htm

      If Bill's legal residence is in SD, then seems like sending letters to the women in Weatherford, TX and the family in Red Oak, TX with demand to sign an affidavit or be sued is a violation of TX law and a couple sections in 18 U.S.C. Capture 41.

      http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title18/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap41-sec875

      Delete
    4. Sorry - 18 USC Chapter 41, not Capture.

      Delete
  17. So bill is going to own my ip? Is he going to hack my ip? Usage of the word "owning" is used by gamers and hackers. Bill has stated he already hacked blogger and was able to get the passwords of all of our google accounts. Now he claims he will own our ip addresses. The only IP address he has are those from his tracking them on the blogs he has. Good luck hacking though major ISP accounts. This could complies with his people like Dottie who helped him get personal information like social security numbers .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sean, ya know...Billy's butt hurt about all his "copyrighted" images, but what about his use of your images on his site? Have you threatened to sue him yet?

      Delete
  18. Mr. Webb are you having fun downloading the blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL he's probably working for Windsor. Maybe he was the one who made up the New York lie Windsor posted earlier.

      Delete
  19. This is something I haven't heard before - Sonny Bono was murdered. Yep.

    Joe Kelly's latest diatribe on NLA had me going for a minute, I was leaning his way - a video of Bundy, I kinda understand Bundy's point about the land, then a video of David Karesh, he had a point about no knock warrants. Next is a video of Sonny Bono in a Congressional hearing about Waco, he makes Janet Reno look silly.

    But he lost me after that. He said "In due process due victims by criminals what happens when someone dares to do a good dead?" I think he meant deed, not dead. Then he posted this:

    http://www.dcdave.com/article5/080406.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well sure, Sonny was murdered...by Mr. Ever Green and Mr. Mo Mentum.

      Delete
    2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvhtITfLDAo
      :-)

      Delete
    3. hahahahahaha

      Y'all are cracking me up.

      Delete
  20. Not sure why Windsor posted a picture of the old Jeep, making it sound like he was recently with those people in the picture to prove he is still alive. Those lemmings are so gullible. KPat even reposted the picture in a comment below. WTH is wrong with these people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is wrong with them?
      There is not enough cyberspace to EVER list &/or detail all that is wrong with them!
      Make it simpler, "what is right about these people?"





      #nada #zip #zero #irrelevant
      The ONLY thing these 'people' have in common with the human race?
      NOSTRILS.
      THAT is IT ~

      Delete
  21. Ricardo Rivero posted his "testimony" video on Bill's page, with comments that an appeals court ruled against him. His primary issue is re: child support - it's a convoluted story, involving the mom's other baby daddy. I don't have it all figured out, but appears that the appeal Rivero is talking about has to do with his suing the state for $50 million because he was arrested twice on the same warrant for failure to appear and/or failure to pay support. The child subject to the order of support was born in 1990.

    I brought this up because I'm appalled at Rivero's discrimination claim. He says he has a 6th grade education, he can't read or write. He says he should be covered under the American with Disabilities Act and should have been provided with representation and/or a reader for his court actions. Since when is laziness considered "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity"? Heck, John Darash only got to the 8th grade - look at what he's been able accomplish on his own. Rivero spent time in prison before all the mess started with baby momma, he had plenty of time to learn how to read and write at tax payers expense.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suMccI8SEvQ

    http://www.floridajail4judges.com/counties/Sarasota_County.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marty could've probably successfully played that angle if he hadn't pretended to graduate from BJU...

      Delete
    2. Marty needs to down play his education and file more law suits if he wants to keep up with the "reform" groupies. Seems Rivero is on the verge of being declared vexi.

      http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=2D13-5079%20and%202D13-5080&s=FL&d=68632

      http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/unpub/ops/201113291.pdf

      Delete
    3. Ricardo Rivero Bill Windsor the Florida's Second District Court of Appeal's ruled against me .... 2d 13 5079 / 2d 13 5080 .. wow this is crazy..
      12 hours ago

      Bill Windsor How can this be? Email the order to me at nobodies@att.net if you'd like me to see it.
      13 minutes ago

      The order Bill is asking to see is the first link posted ^^^. I can't wait for Bill's feedback, I hope it's public.

      Delete
    4. "How can this be???" Oh brother. Like Windsor has a clue about laws, orders and rulings. Of course he will say it was "Unconstitutional" he doesn't know any other terms. "Denied, overruled, or just plain hell no- you got nothing, are not feasible terms to Windsor.

      Dude, pay your child support. (And stop listening to jerks who tell you to claim "Void orders".)

      Delete
    5. Can't you imagine how proud the "child" born in 1990 is of his "father"?
      I'll bet $1, Ricardo didn't spend as much time WITH kid, as he has spent on the vexi shit RE his kid. Hell, make $100~

      Delete
    6. One thing these people all have in common is the belief that their rights supersede the rights of others. This Rivero guy is another piece of work. The complaint in federal court was filed 4/2/09, case 09-20852, naming baby momma, her attorney and various government officials for conspiracy to violate his civil rights and rights under the ADA. The case finally resolved on 5/22/13, dismissed for want of prosecution. He was ordered to pay baby momma $6,650 in legal fees. The whole mess started in 2001, the kid was 19 when Rivero filed the action in federal court. If he would have just paid up like a responsible father he could have avoided jail (both times) and had the arrears paid off. But no - he literally made a federal case of it and now owes $20,650 instead of $14,000. Not to mention cost to tax payers.

      Delete
    7. Weill he give him legal advice? He was warned in federal court not to advocate as an attorney for his wife.

      Delete
    8. "One thing these people all have in common is the belief that their rights supersede the rights of others" Exactly NB!

      Schied- didn't pull over.
      Windsor- continued to sell tickets he was ordered not to
      Prehn- Swindled his mom's ss $
      Ramsey- aided a murder & dismembered the body
      Deenan- Munchausen Mary won't let it go
      Rivero- Child support slacker
      KPat- 6 times arrested offender
      Gibellina- Child support slacker
      Robinson-Murdered son-in-law

      ETC!!!

      Delete
    9. Don't forget windsor who supported and provided a provoked or inspired Paulson to threaten a judge. If it weren't for windsor Paulson may have never formed a grand jury.

      Delete
  22. Mary d= dumb, maybe she has a mental issue stopping her from comprehending normal things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe she admitted that she was diagnosed and prescribed medication. Just like numerous other Lawless America followers. They have been diagnosed, and prescribed medication, yet, decide that is in not 'them', it's the doctors with the issues. All goes back to what NB said, their rights trump everyone elses, including their rights to run around the world all mentally disturbed and crazy, inflicting their delusions on the rest of us.

      Case in point- Nance everyone is Mike Evans Figat.

      Delete
    2. Yes, something is definitely wrong with Mary

      "Mary Deneen "Good Faith" donations to filmmaker Bill Windsor compromised and hijacked by cyberstalkers' criminal defamation, libel, sander, harassment, criminal impersonation, intimidation and violent veiled and vile threats causing fear."

      Delete
    3. There really should be a mental fitness test to access the internet.

      Delete
  23. Bill Windsor "For those who don't know, sweet Mary has been horribly ridiculed and defamed by the Joeys. They have attacked her because she supports me. Thanks for everything, Mary."

    @ Bill or lemming reading for Bill - that comment is pure BULL SH*T. Booshie is the only person that has attacked Mary. And I believe he did so because of her association with Bill Windsor and Crystal Cox. Otherwise, people take notice of Mary only because she makes public comments relative to her situation that are redundant and out of place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, NBTDT! It doesn't take a neurologist or psychologist to read, as you stated, the redundancy in MaryD's public comments!
      Mary D most probably is very sweet, & obviously gullible & begs for the slightest attention, especially from Big Vexi. Bless his little black soul for acknowledging her by name! She'll thrive off that for months! It really is the very least he could do! At least LIKE or comment back to her occasionally.
      She's definitely been his most loyal supporter. She swore up& down in her affidavit sent to Texas to a lot of BillSchit.

      #LemmingLifer

      Delete
    2. I agree, sweet Mary is probably lit up like a Christmas tree with Bill's acknowledgement. Which, IMO, makes Bill even more cruel - he made a false statement, using Mary's vulnerability and support of him to incite more hatred towards his dissenters.

      Delete
    3. Crazy doesn't automatically make you sweet, IMO.

      Just saying...

      Delete
    4. A) Mary exposed her life when she allowed Windsor to post her story on youtube for anyone to make opinions about.
      B) Her divorce is on line
      C) Her children are now thriving under their father's care (not being deprived like Mary keeps saying. If anyone has been defamed it's her ex Randy, by her) Seems Mary might fall under the same category as those other child support slackers listed above.
      D) Windsor is an asshole

      Delete
    5. I meant to put "sweet" in quotations - Bill's word, not mine.

      Delete
    6. Facebook, Jan 17, 2014

      Mary Deneen Bill needs a good honest private investigator, and body guard.
      16 hours ago · Like

      Mary Deneen Facebook took LawlessAmericaFacebook down d/t fabricated nudity alleged by Boushie to hide evidence of Boushie's emails w/ use of a Big Knife w Threats.

      Deneen Missoula Municipal Judge Denies Me a TRO Hearing against Sean Boushie for threats w a Big Knife. Court Clerk states stalking in electronic communications w screenshots are not recognized by the courts, that it is too difficult to PROVE the sender. And, that Bill Windsor fabricated web pages and threats in Boushie's name, that he is a vexatious litigant.
      15 hours ago · Like

      Bill Windsor Who was the judge? And you are telling me the judge said I fabricated something????
      11 hours ago · Like

      Mary Deneen Missoula Municipal Judge Warren. His Court Clerk name "Matt" called today and said Mr. Windsor and others have fabricated Boushie web pages and fabricated Boushie threats and that Mr Windsor is a vexatious litigant. He claims Mr Windsor fabricated stalking electronic communications evidence to the MT courts!

      Bill Windsor Mary, did you by any chance get that on tape? That Matt is a real scumbag.

      Mary Deneen Sorry I didn't.

      Delete
    7. I just so happen to know of a former bodyguard to Ronald Reagan. More recently, Jennifer Love Hewitt...

      Delete
    8. Jennifer Love Hewitt is a body guard? What number do I call???

      Delete
    9. LMAO - good idea. It will help the economy in MI and he's already part of the LA family.

      Delete
    10. They can post a selfie together wearing their bulletproof vests!

      Delete
  24. Windsor just got advice,"If a person receives some Internet harassment that is minor, it's usually wise to just ignore it. If it's serious, then it may be better to notify the police and consider filing a lawsuit, but don't get back at the person. One reason is, if someone who gets harassed then tries to get back at the harasser, when federal investigators come in to look around, they are going to see two people harassing each other back and forth. As such, they may just figure it's two people arguing, harassing each other equally, which is why it's so important to refrain from trying to get back at anyone over the Internet. When law enforcement comes in, they might only see you doing the harassing and arrest you. All because someone harassed you but you tried to retaliate by having poor morals too? Federal criminal law doesn't allow anyone to retaliate against anyone else, no matter what the reason.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I was the one that posted the stuff about 1-Jobs when my wife and I were there, he knows who I am I am still in touch with the players from BrassRing. I have the time and $$ to counter sue. Bring it.................

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I ❥ you.

      Will you sit by me today? **bats eyelashes**scoootches over**

      ♛

      Delete
    2. @ 1:16 - I appreciate your bravado, but Bill made an empty threat. He can't add you to a law suit that is stayed. And unless the US District Court Northern District of Texas gives him leave, the complaint filed in Waxahachie, TX is going nowhere.

      Delete
    3. Good point, NB, but can you really call it bravado to stand up against a toothless hamster on meth?

      (I kid).

      Delete
  26. WTH is it with Bill's group and child support slackers? JP Grund is back on Bill's page. He's the guy that fled GA, moved to HI to keep from going to jail for not paying support. He complains that some of his property was liquidated to satisfy part of the judgment against him. He said "Now they’ve just let it accumulate over the years to some six-digit number that I don’t even know at this time". They let it? What about his contribution to the problem? These people accept NO responsibility for anything that happens to them. He ends his post with this "So, Bill, what needs to be done next?" The answer is obvious to me - pay the f'ing child support.

    Oh. but another child support slacker, Puri Shea, has a suggestion for JP's problem: "wow JP, should file bankruptcy! I did this when the freakin judge awarded all of my exhusband's atty fees, and he didn't collect any penny."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Puri also said this in her comments to JP: "Freakin judge awarded w/out me in the courtroom, him and his atty only and did it 3 times."

      Right. I found her case. She failed to appear at mandatory settlement hearings. And based on what the court knows of her "new hubbie" (as she calls him all over the internet), I think the right decision was made re: custody of the kids and supervised visits.

      http://www.leagle.com/decision/in%20caco%2020100923060

      Delete
    2. Ummm. I'm no expert on the subject matter, but two things that are not dischargeable are taxes and child support...

      Delete
    3. Actually, both my ex-biz partners owed the IRS big time (ie, millions) and they both went bankrupt and got the tax debt removed. One of the partners screwed me out several hundred grand as well--ya, it hurts but it's only money and I didn't have to go bankrupt and still have pristine credit. Both my ex-biz partners laughed at me for paying my taxes first and paying everything off asap, ie, living with no debt at all, but in the end, I know the old saying is true: "he who laughs last laughs best" . :-)

      Delete
  27. I think I may have hurt my brain by just reading that. WOW

    ReplyDelete
  28. Besides all those slackers and parents who have screwed their child over by not being honest...the other interesting thing about the lemmings is the sheer number of conspiracies and shared delusions. There are more than 2 or 3 that believe they are being fed microwaved thoughts. More than 5 or 6 (probably way more) that have been prescribed medication they won't take. And nearly all believe that there will be some change in laws because of Bill and Lawless America. It's really the full assortment of crazy.

    And the common thread is Bill. LMAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "There are more than 2 or 3 that believe they are being fed microwaved thoughts."

      Dang it...now I have to go make popcorn...

      Delete
    2. And then you have the crazies like Robert Gettinger. I wonder if Bill is paying attention to what Robert is posting on LA's FB page. Unless he advocates for violence against cops, he really should hit the delete button. One of the links Robert posted is to a forum in which there is discussion of putting a bounty on an LE officer using Bitcoin. The officer's name, address, phone number, wife's name and Google map street view of the house is posted. That is way so wrong, I won't re-post the link.

      Delete
    3. Robert and the other guy, Crittenden are very concerning. So much so, the Santa Clara Judge has people watching. And Windsor has no idea why he's linked to terrorist comments? He knows. He was included the letter sent out regarding being watched.

      Delete
    4. Is there a copy of the letter posted/linked somewhere?

      Funny how Bill doesn't tell the whole story. I found these little nuggets while rummaging around last night. Deborah Breuner responded to a comment Robert Gettinger posted on her FB page, then wrote about it on her blog. Deborah was rich but now lives in a tent. Bill was supposed to film Deborah's story of corruption, but he no showed - if I recall correctly he posted on FB that he couldn't find the tent. She said this and much, much more about Bill: "Problem with BILL WINDSOR is he's as dishonest as he wants Americans to realize of the judicial and government system.".

      http://deborahbreuner.blogspot.com/2013/06/but-truth-still-isnt-out-until-it-is.html

      This is an interesting exchange between Deborah and Dottie Lafortune. At the end a Targeted Individual chimes into the chat with concerns about Bill's agenda.

      https://www.facebook.com/clare.kaseberg/posts/396424393772875

      Delete
    5. Oh yes, I remember her story. Here is the link to her explanation of the ultimate failure of Windsor.

      http://deborahbreuner.blogspot.com/2012/10/lawlessamerica-another-disappointment.html

      Delete
  29. For your viewing pleasure http://bcove.me/2j042rzu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh wow....lets just go ahead and give her the official title of spokesperson for Lawless America. She wore the shirt, she gets the title.

      Delete
    2. OMG! Well at least everyone was laughing and didn't take her seriously. Probably thought she was comic relief or something. Scary!

      Delete
    3. I hope she has a receipt for the shirt...

      Delete
    4. ROTF - I've always liked Sharon, but if Sharon and Kurt Dornfield are representative of all the candidates, St. Paul is in trouble.

      Great find, Fleming.

      Delete
    5. lol, that was pretty funny, and The joke at the end, woow haha

      Delete
  30. An NLA member posted instruction from Jon Roland on Grand Jury reform. Interesting, as he took exception that I pointed out his connections to the SovCit movement.

    http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/comment/1270#comment-1270

    ReplyDelete
  31. Seriously nb, HOW do you get through life with that empty head of your's?

    An NLA member took something from Roland's blog and posted it to the NLA site. This does not mean Roland is "connected" to the NLA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Add ^^^ she didn't say he was^^^

      Delete
    2. Anon 2:13 -- Thanks so much for the laugh; it made my day. FYI, "your's" -- there's no such word in the English language.

      Delete
    3. Correction-- Anon 2:01 is illiterate, not 2:13.

      Delete
    4. @ 2:13 through 3:09 - thank you for your comments. Maybe Snoozie will be embarrassed enough to take some remedial classes so she can keep up.

      Delete
    5. Before Webb calls me stupid again, grammatically, it's a word. In actual usage, no one would use it.

      Delete
    6. Poor Snoozan V as in Vexatious...she sure owns all her sh*t, doesn't she? It's *ALL* in her head!

      Delete
    7. LOL...look at that...Spammy still gets all the credit.

      Delete
    8. "Evil" would better describe you than "stupid."

      Thanks. Sorry I can't say the same...

      Delete
  32. From NLA's site:

    BREAKING NEWS - June 2nd Court date canceled read the following two papers for details we will have a special meeting Thursday at 9PM EST to discuss the details. Click on Monday Call for phone, access code and chat room.

    The judge threw out their case because they didn't pay the filing fee. Funny because Darash spent a good amount of time on Monday night's call explaining to his followers how he gets around paying the filing fees in federal court.

    http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/05-23-14%20Federal%20Court%20Order.pdf

    So, the Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury countered with a writ of error, explaining that they are not a "plaintiff", they are a "tribunal", the judge has no authority to enter the order unless they give him leave and they didn't give him leave. They are not bringing a civil case against the defendants, they are bringing criminal charges against them for "bad behavior". The judge was given 24 hours to sign the writ of mandamus and 8 days to set a hearing. They say the judge's actions border on obstruction of justice and treason.

    And further more: "We the People are not fictional corporations but flesh and blood that have pre-paid your compensation through taxation already collected, we built the building you work in, we pay the electric, phones, computers fax machines, paper, salaries, etc. And we gave you the authority by which you act upon so long as you maintain the security of our rights and thereby be in good behavior, you may keep it. We find the paying of a fee for our unalienable right protected by the
    constitution repugnant."

    http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/05-27-14%20Writ%20of%20error.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Filing papers is no answer at this point

      The courts have shown their contempt. They have shown their intent to simple brush us off. They have shown their willingness to prefer prison to enforcing the constitution. We have shown no method to compel them. They have all the power they need as long as we are unwilling to use force. The answer is in the sheriffs, who apparently, at this point are cowards and traitors and worthy of punishment reserved for traitors. The only entity that has so far shown a willingness to enforce the constitution is the militia. A meeting with the militia is the next nessessary step, to gather their support and influence.

      Submitted by sofasurferlinux on Wed, 05/28/2014 - 18:57

      Delete
    2. Snoozers?
      Think they'll let her join militia? Like frontliner?
      That's her right?

      "...worthy of punishment reserved for traitors." That's Law Enforcement being referred to!!

      Delete
  33. Has Brenda Battle Jordan hopped on the new NLA wagon? I can't recall.
    She's very outspoken. I'm thinking if she was wagon hopping & heard this nugget? Not only will the wheels fall off, but she is gonna go left(er). She kinda scares me.

    ReplyDelete
  34. when will the arrests start happening.

    ReplyDelete
  35. LOL - I found some helpful hints for Allie's upcoming depo.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjtnRmy0H-U

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5ApXMuuG4E

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNy2A4lDgHc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. heh....here is the question. When Bill has to give his deposition, if he were not allowed to begin each answer with I dont recall or it is my belief that....could he actually answer anything?

      Delete
    2. More like this.. 'Incipient verbal Diariaha" http://youtu.be/ZIxmrvbMeKc

      "I'll tell you what Big boy" ~~> Windsor.

      Delete
    3. ^^^ LMAO off at that one - Joe Jamail is big news in TX, so is his son. I would pay to watch Joe depo Bill, just to see if Bill could out bully Joe.

      Delete
    4. Why would she let whistleblower productions video it?

      Delete
    5. I dont think she would but she might not be able to stop him from videotaping it for court purposes

      Delete
    6. Then the court should only allow a legitimate company in to tape. Windsor's company doesn't appear legitimate. Also, it is the company making all the "slander-fella-ella-who-gives-a-shit-smella" films he promised to make.

      Delete
    7. Sluggo on a LaptopMay 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM

      I wonder if Billy still has his Capuchin gear?

      http://i59.tinypic.com/j6qvrc.png

      Delete