Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Windsor is an Expert, And He Can Verify that With His Own Testimony


With all his frivolous lawsuits caving in on him across the Nation, Bill is now claiming that he will sue everyone for copyright infringement.  And he should know, after all he was sued for doing that exact thing....so needless to say he is now an expert on the issue.

Speaking of that, here is Bill's "expert witness" document he submitted to court in his Medieval Times case. The only person that could back up his claims was himself, but that doesn't stop him from trying.

https://drive.google.com/?tab=Xo&authuser=0#my-drive

Ok, so to sum up, he says he can explain how it was that Alcatraz had about $112,000 net annual profit from the sale of Medieval Times tickets, but because MT didn't allow Alcatraz to participate in some of their direct marketing promotions.....they caused Alcatraz a $4.4 million loss.  But the real fun starts on page 14 when he gets all nostalgic about his "life's work".

He explains how he got started as a flunk out student from UT who started selling credit cards to poor college kids who couldn't afford it, what a noble endeavour.  He was accepted to law school, but he wont say where, but since he was making so much money he decided to invest all of his savings....$3,500 into his new company.  Well its gets even crazier from there....the whole thing should have had the preference of "A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away".  Spoiler alert..Ryan discovered the internet.

92 comments:

  1. and also note in there that he admits his entire operation of Alcatraz is based on them selling tickets at a higher price than buyers could get directly from the company. Bill always cries about people calling his "businesses" a scam saying that its not illegal, but thats not the point. A scam can be technically legal, but still a scam. When you entire target audience is based on the "sucker" approach, you are operating a scam. No different than Jeff Barron was....whom bill repeatedly highlighted in his fake movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He certainly is an expert on himself...

      Delete
    2. Good point. Even if a behavior isn't illegal, that doesn't make ethical.

      Delete
  2. I am working on getting the entire bankruptcy filings from First Communications AKA 1-jobs.com and 1st communications. We know already that there was a bankruptcy in 2002 which means that they were not sold to the Washington Post unless it was during liquidation. We will find out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm still laughing at 'fuzzy math'.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BW: "No, you are quite wrong. Share only allows Facebook pages to be shared. It gives no rights whatsoever to trademarks and copyrights. Taking anything off a Facebook page and using it on another Facebook page or anywhere else is a violation of the owner's rights."

    One can take anything off a public post and repost it onto their own FB page using the share button. Two things we know for sure from the past events. Bill is no expert at Facebook. He needed experts and called on them to migrate his FB pages etc. He even had people who managed the pages for him. He has been very hands off approach.

    Then there is the trademark which is not approved for the logo of Lawless America. I am not an attorney, but I know that he holds no trademarks per the filing that from the get go was blotched and doomed because of how it was filed. It would have been nullified from the get go because of misfiling and error.

    Facebook has also allowed taking public posts and embedding them onto other websites such as blogger and so on. The posts are enact and also intractable. Then you can comment on them. Along with the fact the Facebook allows downloads of photos using the download button. There is no need to used some screenshots or anything like that.


    ReplyDelete
  5. Lets go over what FB says about photos
    For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.

    You grant them a transferable, sub-licensable and on public posts some you can embed and even download without using a downloader screenshot device etc. Note the part where it states that the license ends when a user who has the photos also delete the material. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All the laws and FB TOS aside, he cracks me up with all the 'how dare you post a picture from my fb, wait, what?, oh I will post all the pictures from YOUR fb that I want'. SMH. LOL.

      Delete
    2. Oh but...did you forget? Billy's got the BIG 1st Amendment on his side--he's a genuine fake reporter with a purchased press pass--he's got a license to thrill from authoring many books, and he's got many hours of stalkin' experience and footage, AND MORE!

      Delete
    3. LOL @ 6:19: that should be - and MUCH more...

      Delete
    4. So, even if everything Bill posted is copyrighted:

      US Code Title 17:

      § 107 . Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

      Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

      (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

      (2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

      (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

      (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

      The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

      Delete
    5. § 113 . Scope of exclusive rights in pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works

      (a) Subject to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the exclusive right to reproduce a copyrighted pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work in copies under section 106 includes the right to reproduce the work in or on any kind of article, whether useful or otherwise.

      (b) This title does not afford, to the owner of copyright in a work that portrays a useful article as such, any greater or lesser rights with respect to the making, distribution, or display of the useful article so portrayed than those afforded to such works under the law, whether title 17 or the common law or statutes of a State, in effect on December 31, 1977, as held applicable and construed by a court in an action brought under this title.

      (c) In the case of a work lawfully reproduced in useful articles that have been offered for sale or other distribution to the public, copyright does not include any right to prevent the making, distribution, or display of pictures or photographs of such articles in connection with advertisements or commentaries related to the distribution or display of such articles, or in connection with news reports.

      Delete
    6. And Google Earth has a copyright on the planet...

      Delete
    7. Here's an interesting tidbit from legalzoom:

      Defining Fair Use

      It is an American tradition to poke fun at, criticize and imitate cultural and political icons. However, that tradition could get you sued. There is a defense in copyright cases called "fair use." Section 107 The Copyright Act of 1976 outlines what a court has to consider when determining if something is fair use:

      1) Purpose and character of the work

      2) Nature of the work

      3) Amount and substantiality of the portion used in new work

      4) Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work

      What this means is courts go through four steps, the first of which is to look at whether the creator of the new work did it as social commentary or financial gain. Next, they look at whether it is parody, satire, criticism and if that purpose is obvious in the content. A judge will also consider how much of the original work is included, and whether the will hurt the present or future sales of the old work.

      Source: http://www.legalzoom.com/intellectual-property-rights/copyrights/2-live-crew-weird-al

      Delete
  6. No doubt William Michael Windsor will frantically come up with some spin-filled ranty beating-his-chest keyboard bellow to insist those terms only apply to people who are *not* named William Michael Windsor.


    http://photography.about.com/od/copyrightinformation/a/facebookvsgoogleplusphotolicensing.htm

    ReplyDelete
  7. Talking about political tyrants Bill windsor and his movement of people are very tyrannical.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh huh...Billy's bowel movements are tyrannical.

      Delete
  8. Bill Windsor changed his cover photo.
    2 hours ago · Edited
    THE STATE OF TEXAS IS HOME TO MOST OF MY CYBERSTALKERS.

    My cyberstalkers are scattered around, but the largest number are in Texas.

    I rescheduled Allie Overstreet's deposition for Monday, June 16, but her attorney says she can't get off work, and he refuses to have her deposed for more than six hours. I anticipate that it will take at least three days. I have hundreds of false and/or defamatory statements that have to be explored as each of the elements of defamation must be covered for each statement. Then there are all the missing documents, the identities of the Joeys, and more. So, I have filed a motion asking the judge to rule on all of the discovery issues.

    Next Tuesday in Lexington, Missouri, the judge will consider my motion for a commission to Texas to order the deposition of the Joeyisalittlekid ringleader, Casey P. Hargrove, Shonda Hargrove, and Casey's father, Clyde Hargrove. If granted, I take the commission to an Ellis County court to obtain a subpoena for the depositions of the Hargroves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Then there are all the missing documents, the identities of the Joeys, and more."

      How would he know there are "documents missing?"

      Ah Ha! There's only "and more" not "much more" ---Note that NB!

      (I kid).

      Delete
    2. The Texas case that is currently STAYED?

      He can't help himself. He is compelled from within to be Vexi!
      Very similar to drug use and the withdrawal from not using. Big Vexi didn't get much reaction from his intimidation posts or his latest stalking expeditions, so he has to file something somewhere to get part of his fix. Then, he's got to yak it up on social media to complete strangers for a mere click of the LIKE.

      Sad little life by a big old, lonely & bitter old man. Lather, rinse, spin & repeat. He is the very definition of a 'creature of habit'.

      Delete
    3. oops, too many olds. my apologies.

      Delete
    4. @ 1:21 - LOL. Figures he'd leave out the "much" after I call him on it.

      Delete
    5. I'm Anon 1:21 and I feel your pain. :-)

      Delete
    6. As an attorney, there's no way in hell I would ever let Windsor have more than the six hours of deposition time allowed by the rules. I'd close the deposition and walk out with my client at 6:00:01.

      Also, as an aside, I can't get this particular Google Drive document to come up -- the link seems to lead elsewhere. If somebody could post an appropriate link, I'd appreciate it. Reading Windsor's work reminds me how much I actually learned in law school, and why pro se plaintiffs are always so . . . tediously amusing.

      Delete
    7. yeah I'm sorry about the google drive thing...still trying to figure out how to work it, for some reason blogspot wont let me just upload documents.

      See if this works
      https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4qOlSHNnmKedWIwSVpsRzJrR2c/edit?usp=sharing

      Delete
    8. That worked. Thanks Ginger.

      Hey, is Windsor still in Bob Carroll's court in Waxahachie? If so, do we know when the next hearing will take place? I'd love to take a half day and go watch the festivities.

      Delete
    9. The case is currently stayed. Bill tried to get leave by writing a letter to the Fed judge saying if you don't say no I'll take it as a yes. Carroll didn't go for that and made Bill go get actual leave which he has been unable to attain

      Delete


  9. 06/06/2014 Motion Hearing Scheduled
    Scheduled For: 06/17/2014; 9:00 AM ; DENNIS ALLEN ROLF; Lafayette
    Notice of Hearing Filed
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Hearing several pending Motions on 6-17-14 at 9:00 AM. (4 faxed pages)
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv Answers Interrog Fil
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing Defendant's Amended Answer to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories (with amended answers attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Interrog Filed
    (with interrogatories attached)
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Req for Admission
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing Fourth Request for Admissions (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Req for Admission
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing Third Request for Admissions (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Req for Admission
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing Second Request for Admissions (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Req for Admission
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing First Request for Admissions (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Prod of Docs, etc
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing of Plaintiff's Fourth Request for Production of Documents (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Cert Serv of Prod of Docs, etc
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice of Filing of Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents (with the Request attached).
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Motion Filed
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Motion to Declare that Plaintiff is Not a Public Figure or a Limited Purpose Public Figure.
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Notice to Take Deposition
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Notice to Take Deposition of Allie Loraine Yager Overstreet on 6-16-2014 at 1:00 PM.
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Motion for Sanctions
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Motion to Compel
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Motion for Sanctions.
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Motion Filed
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Motion for Comprehensive Hearing on Discovery Issues, Motion to Compel Discovery, and Motion for Sanctions.
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
    Motion Filed
    Pro Se Plaintiff files Motion for Protective Order.
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There'd be more but his fax machine overheated...

      Delete
    2. He's not a public figure?
      That's funny! He's spent countless hours & dollars trying to convince so many that he is!
      That's a doozy!

      Delete
    3. What...only 15 additional motions? He's losing steam...someone open a can of meringue for him STAT!

      Delete
    4. This past weekend I found this link:

      http://universaldomainexchange.com/whoswho/bill-windsor/

      I tried to go back to the site this morning but it has been turned off.

      Unfortunately for Billy, there's an archive of the page here:

      http://archive.today/4nLM

      Here's a the "soupbone" (Political) section which nicely adduces his status as a pubic figure:

      Political

      Bill Windsor wants to Save America. After he discovered corruption in the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia, Bill made a commitment that he will not stop until these judges are exposed for the world to see. His friends will tell you that Bill is as tenacious as they come.
      Bill Windsor will spend the rest of his life on this if necessary. As the result of publicity about his United States Supreme Court Actions, Bill has become a leader in the battle to bring honesty to government and to regain our fundamental rights under the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
      Bill's websites are Lawless America and GRIP -- Government Reform & Integrity Platform.

      Tens of thousands of people follow Bill Windsor's activism efforts. Bill wants to reach at least a million.

      Delete
    5. So you are saying that Bill Windsor is calling Bill Windsor a liar?

      Delete
    6. I'm saying Bill WIndsor said Bill WIndsor is calling Bill WIndsor a liar.

      ( Ruh-roh...STOP this crazy thing!)

      Delete
    7. and I'm sure Bill Windsor could get a sworn affidavit from Bill Windsor, copyrighted by Bill Windsor, that in fact Bill Windsor said what Bill Windsor said to the best of Bill Windsor's recollection

      Delete
    8. And on Allie's deposition, he had to rescheduled it from the 2nd to the 16th because she could make it on the 2nd but is at work on the 16th. He is only comfortable talking to his empty chair

      Delete
    9. A: I'm famous because I said so.

      B: I'm not famous because no one cares about what I said in "A" above.

      Delete
    10. I have seen a draft of a lawsuit against the NLA from Windsor. Things are about to get messy soon.

      Delete
    11. What about his PRESS card/badge thingamajig? Doesn't that make him media?
      Just from this viewpoint, it seems as though Windsor has spent many years jumping up and down, attempting to gain any attention from the public. Running for political office, creating and leading his political party, complete with State of the Union "reports". Those are just a couple of the "I'm a public figure" examples that come quickly to mind. No doubt there are dozens more.
      He's going the distance, from Olympic conclusion jumping, Vexatious litigant, serial (failure) entrepreneur all the way to "Windsor is not a public figure" Sprinter!
      He really was never a journalist. Is Windsor a fictional writer? Without a doubt, just read his 'filings'!

      Delete
    12. Anon 4:54pm? Windsor is going to get all vdxi with the NLA? That's funny! He's all kinds of butthurt that while he's goofing off on one of his stalking expeditions and his banishment from Facebook, all the lemmings hauled it over to the new popular anti-government group?

      We have to get more popcorn soon.

      Delete
    13. Zooming around DC with a billboard means you're private by nature.

      Delete
  10. You can't defame unpopular things

    ReplyDelete
  11. The litmus test is "has Marty Prehn declared you a National Hero?"

    Yes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When is bills interview in Ellen?

      Delete
    2. He's trying to get it rescheduled to the 16th...

      Delete
    3. Bill's going to interview IN Ellen? That will be a new experience for both of them.

      Delete
    4. I'm pretty sure that's not her style.

      Delete
  12. Bill Windsor changed his cover photo.
    about an hour ago · Edited
    MONTANA SUPREME COURT IS AS CORRUPT AS IT GETS!

    The Montana Supreme Court today issued an order in my appeal against the man who has threatened me repeatedly (known as Soushie). The order is as outrageous as court orders get.

    The order contains one absolutely false statement after another, ignores the issues and the facts, and ignores the law.

    I wasn't surprised. The work I did in Montana proved to me that the state is hopelessly corrupt in covering up for Soushie. I believe Soushie is paid by the University of Montana to stalk and threaten people like me an my family. This seals the deal.

    So, now there will be a hearing in Missoula Montana in which I will get Soushie and his wife on the witness stand. Not that it will matter.

    Among other things, I have allegedly been restricted by a temporary order of protection that lasts 20 days. It has been nine months.

    I will be going to Helena, Montana to film outside the Montana Supreme Court building. Should be fun.

    I have never been in jail, never charged with or convicted of a crime. But, that could change. I will complete the pilot for the proposed television series that I went to Missoula to film, and it will be broadcast. If using this thing's name is considered a violation of the court order, then we'll see if I get arrested. Nothing else has gotten the mainstream media's attention. Perhaps arresting me for producing a documentary exposing corruption might get some media coverage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Coming soon to a University town near you...PIEMAGEDDON II -- The Return. Can it get any better than this?

      Delete
    2. "So, now there will be a hearing in Missoula Montana in which I will get Soushie and his wife on the witness stand."

      Oh yeah? What hearing in MT? MTSC is done. They affirmed the lower court rulings with one exception - the bond set for suing judges & court employees is ordered stricken from the record. But, the court can set a bond, in any amount deemed appropriate by the court, for any complaint filed in MT. And the Fed case has been referred to the Judge Magistrate, there are no hearings listed on the docket.

      He really should read the court's opinion very carefully. If he's planning a trip like that, he has overlooked some very important information and feedback re: his behavior.

      Delete
    3. "Nothing else has gotten the mainstream media's attention. Perhaps arresting me for producing a documentary exposing corruption might get some media coverage."

      Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury,

      We have asserted all along Mr. Windsor is a Public Figure, limited or unlimited is immaterial to this case. What matters is this statement in his own words...he's willing to risk jail for publicity...can it be any clearer than that?

      Delete
    4. Oh My. So, will there be another episode of COPS? I can’t wait for him to film it all over again. I wanted him to come here so we can have a FilmOff. He is pointing his very expensive Sony cam at me and I have my iPhone filming him while were live on youtube making The Slanderers. Oh well! I was all ready. I had already started applying for the Michigan Film Credit. I have already the process to Copyright The Slanderers and I have put an add in Craigs list to get some talent lined up as extras. I rented the Rappa Dome on 8 Mile the one that has all the poles still in place from the stoppers. I also starting writing one liner rap lines and I have been watching 8 mile nightly practicing my moves. All this for nothing. I am really sad. I already was about to even by the slanderers.com and theslanderers.com I was also starting to line up interviews with people who have defected from Lawless waiting forever and that went over to the NLA. I have just ordered my press pass from that same place also it was only 35$ what a steal with my discount.

      Some small stats, Windsor without getting on the Ballot secured 7 votes for congress in 2012. One thing I am thinking about writing about is the downfall of First Communications of Ohio. I am going to go to Ohio this fall and I can do some videos of where it used to be ect.

      Delete
  13. Will that thing (bill windsor) be wearing his stupid bulletproof vest with all its accouterments? I think that thing should get a helmet, facemask, new shirt, and all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think he's going with his Swarm of One Super Hero outfit:

      http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=34dqwck&s=5#.U5fAxXYWfUw

      Delete
    2. "" These scumbags will say and do anything. I cannot wait for Facebook to cough up the identities and IP addresses of all the lowlife.” Then what will he use his little program and track us down to the area we live in and drive around our neighborhoods. That thing is such a loser boy.

      Delete
    3. He cannot wait for Facebook to cough up the identities?

      Wait. What?

      Screenshot #1 from May 24th, 2014 "I have already received two batches of IP addresses - one from Google and one from Facebook."

      See - http://oi62.tinypic.com/2affq5j.jpg

      Screenshot #2 - June 10th, 2014 I cannot wait for Facebook to cough up the identities and IP addresses...."

      See - http://oi61.tinypic.com/2m5z1wh.jpg



      *scratches head*

      Bill doesn't lie - ever. He swears in his court documents he never tells a lie. So why would he be waiting for Facebook to cough up what they gave him weeks ago?

      You need to be better at keeping track of your lies Bill.

      Delete
    4. According to screenshot #1, we DO have a crisis of dishonesty in America.

      It's nice to do everything humanly possible to expose lowlife's like Bill.

      Delete
  14. Roby McKinney And they wonder what happened to the person who goes off the deep end and shoots people? This kinda crap will drive you insane, if you are not strong enough to put it in and keep it in a proper perspective. You may think that idiot has to have some pull for this to happen, but the truth is, he is a nobody! It is all about who he has for a lawyer!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^ "And they wonder what happened to the person who goes off the deep end and shoots people?"

      There it is. Vagabond Billy, with no known physical address, a gun which he stated he was "going to get" a permit for in South Dakota, which he claimed he bought due to "too many crazies" (was that the intent to shoot crazies?) floating around the US, making threats to hunt his "haters" for the rest of his life, wearing a bullet proof jacket....WTF more of a warning do people need?

      A man who's pissed off at the world, with a vendetta, who's made several very questionable comments, who was rumored to be taking some kind of anti paranoia medication (or something similar) with a gun that's not licensed or permitted based on his own comments. Red Flag anyone?

      Delete
    2. Not to mention he stated he is going to risk arrest to break a TOP against him. Sounds like he's headed over the edge to me.

      Delete
    3. Someone should call the dallas county sherriff

      Delete
    4. ^^^ For what?? Bill acting like a tough guy isn't illegal. It's funny but not illegal. He isn't going to do anything except cry corruption every time he loses in court then copy & paste more motions.

      Delete
    5. ↑↑↑↑-TROLL ALERT-↑↑↑↑

      Delete
    6. Windsor is a raging lunatic waiting to explode

      Delete
    7. ^^^^ If you think I'm a troll here you're WAY off. Do you really think Bill's advisor Susan would say that about him? Maybe you should point out to me what about my comment makes me seemike a troll.

      Delete
    8. You seem to imply Billy has done nothing illegal over these last few years but to play "the tough guy." Is that a valid inference or an over-extension?

      Delete
    9. Not sure where in my statement I implied Bill hasn't done anything illegal over the years. I'm referring to right now. What reason would you have for calling the Dallas sheriff TODAY? Othef than spouting off on FB yesterday, what did he do. My point is, all his talk on FB is nothing more than just talk. I don't think you can call the Dallas sheriff and report him for something he did in another state "over the last few years".

      Delete
  15. Current score…

    Boushie-16+ Rulings in his favor

    Windsor--ZERO!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well of course. As it should be!!

      Windsor was attempting to turn "Appeals" into "Civil cases." He can't let the lemmings know that the courts actually followed the laws and saw through his master manipulations. That would blow his whole "Everyone is hopelessly corrupt" mantra out the window.

      Delete
  16. Lynn Maris Ok think about it- how is Sushi getting this far wo a lawyer? You see what happens to pro se parents in family court! And if Sushi is connected to corrupt govt officials that means anyone supporting him or participating with Sushi in the stalking & harassment is equally involved. Bill has connected domestic abuse advocates to Sushi. And ppl with media & political connections. If you gave sensitive info or worked with these ppl Bill has named in his complaint, now you are at risk. The stalkers are attempting to silence the voices of ppl who have been victimized by the govt. They are supporting the corruption, leading to real damage & physical harm for countless Americans & their children.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Lynn,

      Here's a rhetorical question for you (you don't need to reply because the answer is painfully obvious): how many filings have you actually read involving Windsor, Boushie and the U. of MT?

      Delete
    2. Lynn Maris If you filmed testimony with Bill or not, we are all targets of the stalkers. This means if you lost custody to a dangerous or unfit parent, they support the corrupt judge. They don't want anyone to hear the testimonies Bill has filmed. And children continue to be abused. If you were wrongly thrown in prison, the stalkers want you to rot there. They don't want anyone to see the testimonies Bill has filmed, & without raising awareness, how do we fight for change? The stalkers who slander, harass, threaten violence & attempt to destroy Lawless are attacking innocent ppl victimized by the corrupt govt. This is hurting their chance for justice & putting lives at risk. We need to support Bill bc his battle is our own.

      Delete
    3. God damn, that's a miserable bunch of kooks that follow him...

      Delete
    4. You Sir are Correct!

      http://i61.tinypic.com/2v15aw0.jpg

      Delete
    5. On one point I concur with Lynn, actually: I think Boushie's string of victories in Montana courts is reasonably impressive.

      One thing giving him a significant boost, of course, is Windsor being Windsor in court filings; shockingly, judges don't take kindly to his antics. Regardless, a clear victory is a clear victory, and one has to tip one's hat to the results Boushie has been able to get in court.

      I've litigated against a handful of kooks who are, say, 75% as unreasonable as Windsor, and though I am undefeated against those particular guys (thankfully!), I don't think I've ever gotten a court to issue an order with as much unvarnished boo-yah truth in it as the last few Montana decisions have contained.

      So nice work, Mr. B.

      Delete
    6. And even more victories to come. With a grand, gray cellular, er singular finish. complete with a free new stylish one piece wardrobe and free boudoir, er head shots...

      Delete
    7. "an order with as much unvarnished boo-yah truth in it as the last few Montana decisions have contained."

      Ain't that the truth.

      Some of the lemmings don't appear to be ignorant, or sick. Just boggles the mind they are unable to grasp the idea that Bill is a victim of his own behavior.

      Delete
  17. anyone who wants to read the documentation on The California case go here:

    >>>http://openaccess1.sanmateocourt.org/openaccess/default.asp

    >>>> Civil Open Access >>>> Name Search >>> type in his last name and first name >>>> hit search >>>> then click the bottom one, click on case number >>>> and the little camera icons on the far right are the documents

    ReplyDelete

  18. Elizabeth O'Nan What does this mean? Will/can you appeal? My thoughts and prayers are with you.

    Is this woman really that far behind here about the montana cases

    ReplyDelete
  19. What does this mean..??
    "Rocky B. Hunt Narcacist & Sociopaths without empathy must be terminated-at once! Hay ARNOLD!"
    Sounds like another crazy threat, but to who?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reference to Schwarzenegger, I presume.

      Delete
  20. Theresa Schuna Bill THE GOVERNMENTS KKK MASONS . Churches an all the boys club's there are so many of them. Are all apart of this satanic religion follow the symbols an flags are a symbol. Are at every one of their buildings. An their religion believes in sacrificing us an our children too this system. I really don't think you are going to get help from them. An be careful


    Another crazy person. I am almost convinced bills followers belong in the looney farm right along with that lunatic thing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. P S A
      *full moon approaching*
      Please have strong gauge foil nearby.
      Is Aagent MongMoose on timeout? With all the comments zinging over on Windsor's page, how is it he isn't chiming in? He must be banished again, or the library fell down.

      Delete
    2. Yup, Theresa is obviously linguistically challenged. In other words, her Broca's Area is really broke-a.

      Delete
    3. @6:37 - that's the general consensus.

      Delete
  21. Paul Joseph "Bill Windsor This is so sad. Stay strong. I feel they are going after you because you are effective in exposing corruption. They don't want you to work freely & do noy want you to bring out the Documentary/ Movie but I hope you prevail. We are with you! God bless!!"


    The lemmings are really starting to hurt my feelings. Why do they assume nobody wants to the movie made? I do want to see more videos and I do too want Bill to "bring out" the documentary. I've gone through the background of most "victims", I'm running out of fun things to research. It would be nice to have fresh material. I think knowing the background of the "victims" in the movie would make it funny. Spoof like. I'm always up for a funny movie.

    ReplyDelete
  22. But I am getting tired of lemmings that can't keep up.

    Tim Vawter "Bill this is why you need to take t to federal court."

    ReplyDelete
  23. You guys are awesome. I've been victimized by Windsor and I thought it was a long-term cover up like that of Sandusky. Watch Matthew Sandusky on Oprah on the 17th of July, 2014.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Windsor grooms, controls and intimidates. He needs to go to prison for a long time.

    ReplyDelete