Monday, June 30, 2014

Windsor Gets Scolded in Montana


As Bill continues to stalk, threaten, intimate and harass innocent people (mostly women), all while claiming to be in fear for his life, he took a major beat down in Montana as the Federal Court put him in the corner where he belongs.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4qOlSHNnmKeSzcwakVmVk1BSnc/edit?usp=sharing

Not only did they beat him down for being frivolous, the Court added that Windsor is also irrational and delusional.  He is simply unable to hide his abusive behavior within the courts.  Its all he knows and the only thing he is capable of doing.

"Windsor's affidavit reflects his irrational misunderstanding of the civil justice system, and his seemingly delusional or fanciful allegations of corruption which he believes he has exposed through his meritless litigation activities"

Indeed, Windsor's entire legal argument is based on the "because I said so" claim.  Once you remove his idiotic and insane claims.....he doesn't have any tricks left in his magic bag, much less actual proof.  And the Court in MT called his bluff by doing the one thing that really does strike fear in Bill.....they forced him to show cause.  He now must prove that what he did was in fact not frivolous and vindictive, and no amount of self sworn or lemming sworn statements to the effect of "because I said so" will be enough to get him off the hook.  Translation: you can now cross off MT from the lists of States that Windsor can bring his own form of paper terrorism.

This is setting up to be a bad month for Bill as he faces the high possibility of going down in both MO and CA in the next thirty days for his vexatious litigation in those states.  As his legal failures compound on him, his hatred, rage and all around pure evil is now more evident than ever in his relentless attempt to stalk, defame, harass and intimate any and everyone simply because he is a monster who won't take responsibility for his own actions.


78 comments:

  1. And? Guess what? As of 3:14pm CST, 'In Fear' Windsor hasn't been to Kemp, Texas!
    I know! Shocking!

    This Montana Court ruling is precious! Going to re-read it again, while I continue to wait.

    KMc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, it really is a fun read!

      ***waves

      Delete
  2. Oh my, another state that won't let Bill file...lol, they seem to have been unimpressed when you claimed they were using falsified court documents from Pacer. LOL, can you produce any of those falsified docs, or are you still just claiming they are invalid court orders because you don't agree with them?

    Another state bites the dust, and another one gone, and another one gone...

    Bill's new theme song
    LOL

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The Tree Gods shalt not be mocked..."

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love the part where it's his own excessive page count of rants that sank him... As I have always said, Windsor is his own worst enemy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. From the simple (and simplistic) perspective of does-he-do-a-competent-job-as-a-(lay) attorney, Windsor's worst quality has to be his total inability to be succinct. Today's ruling references (with scorn verging on incredulity) a 58-page, 247-paragraph Complaint and a 372-page affidavit. 372 pages!

      And we've seen Windsor file massive documents like those over and over again, in case after case. Motions piled on motions, stacks of interminable affidavits that rival old-school phone books.

      What leaves me gaping about all this is the constant question: how could Windsor possibly think that this kind of tactic is effective? I mean, leave aside the merits of what he's arguing; clearly Windsor believes in most or all of it himself. Just from a perspective of will this improve Windsor's chances of getting the court outcome he wants, how is a 372-page affidavit ever going to do anything but piss a judge off?

      Judges and judicial clerks are human beings. They have families and lives. They don't have the time or the resources to deal with multi-hundred-page pleadings and affidavits. Filing something that long is just guaranteeing that the judge will miss (if not simply ignore) most of what you have to say.

      So: leaving everything else out, I simply don't understand what it is that leads this man to file the kinds of pointless and tactically absurd things he does. It's just bizarre.

      Delete
    2. I think he has the court room confused with the ballot box. He thinks if he can get enough random people to say nice things about him under oath....he should win.

      He even referenced that in an earlier filling in MT where he said that Boushie only had like 4 pages while Bill had over 400 pages of "evidence"

      Delete
    3. I don't think a mentally fit person WOULD file the mounds and mounds of drivel Windsor files. They'd know better.

      Delete
    4. Sadly, I think the answer to Attorney's question lies in psycho-pathology.
      Windsor is delusional as the judge wrote because Windsor displays all the symptoms of a narcissistic sociopath with histrionic and paranoid tendencies. He'll never be able to put himself in another person's shoes, so thus he continues to make the same mistake over and over, ie, with respect to length of filings, more is better. Although he knows he causes pain to others, he simply doesn't care--that's the difference and the problem, IMO.

      Delete
    5. I agree with Anon @ 10:33, in part. Bill clearly exhibits narcissistic tendencies. But I think it's more than that, but not about winning either.

      Like Snoozie said, it's a war. I remember reading and/or hearing Bill say on more than one occasion that he did not expect to win. Early on it was all about collecting evidence of corruption. Every time he is told no, it's more evidence of corruption. After he was through collecting evidence, all of the corrupt judges, clerks and lawyers would be indicted by a CLGJ, then prosecuted for all kinds of crimes, like misprision of felony and treason.

      For Bill, more is better. His approach seems to be 'look at ALL this evidence you have ignored, you must be corrupt!'. But before he could finish collecting evidence and form CLGJ, his revolution train ran of the tracks.

      John Darash has basically implemented the same plan. He/NLA expect to be ignored. As they are ignored, their CLGJ is indicting every judge and clerk that tells them no. They've moved up to threatening the US District Court NY Chief Judge with an indictment and they are threatening to indict the sheriffs if the sheriffs don't arrest the judges that have been indicted

      Darash cut to the chase, he's more direct and more focused. But what they have in common, all of these groups like LA & NLA, is the leaders seem to think some version of attacking the courts is the best method to over throw the current government and "come to power".

      What boggles my mind is why the seemingly normal people with an unresolved legal issue or legitimate activist group would put any confidence in a leader that never wins.

      Delete
    6. Also boggles my mind that people jumped off Bill's train when it ran off the tracks and joined up with NLA blaming this blog for Bill's failure. It seems beyond their comprehension that methods "to save our country" by attacking the courts are inherently fatally flawed. It doesn't matter whether Darash files 5 pages in the court or Bill files 372 pages.

      Partial comment from NLA's site:


      Zahraaliel51 I agree with you that is exactly who joeyisalittlekid are...... Debbie downers and the devils minions.

      Does sbharbison AND sofasurferlinux both support NLA and the Common Law Grand Jury?

      I appreciate the fact someone posted the joeyisalittlekid blog to let us know the posting of lies about the NLA and Common Law Grand Jury and our endeavors to save the country. This is the same group that targeted and stalked Bill Windsor with Lawless America and look where that ended up. On the cutting room floor...

      Thanks
      Ohio State coordinator

      Submitted by prov2828 on Tue, 04/29/2014 - 13:52

      Delete
    7. And more blind faith in leaders with losing records:


      So Now What?

      After the 6-27-14 Federal Court Mandamus to Chief Judge Sharpe.pdf and 6-27-14 Federal Judge indicted True Bill Judge Suddaby.pdf what;s the deadline and what happens next?

      Submitted by phl5016 on Mon, 06/30/2014 - 22:31


      We will find out...have patience

      I trust John's group up there in planning this. I am sure they have planned this process out way ahead of time and are planning several scenarious depending upon the corrupt judicial system's responses to the filings and indictments. They are also doing all of this lawfully and in accordance with the founding father documents. There are alot of naysayers out there trying to subvert the NLA actions and that tells me that we must be doing something right. The key is education and John stated along time ago the documents they provide on this website have been researched extensively as to their truth and correctness.

      Submitted by JL on Mon, 06/30/2014 - 23:23

      Delete
    8. "There are alot of naysayers out there trying to subvert the NLA actions and that tells me that we must be doing something right."

      LMFAO!! Why is it that these morons, LA, NLA, and all the other conspiracy idiots, always say this? Does it make them feel better? Help them ignore the stupidity that everyone else on the planet see's in them? This is THE stupidest statement ever--used to excuse the fact that they are simply idiots.

      Delete
    9. You know, maybe they say this so they don't have to follow through with anything. I mean, what they are doing is going to get them arrested. So have the eff at it. Please, do, no one is stopping you. File your charges, arrest your Judges and all the others. Please!! Then when you are thrown in jail, we won't have to listen to how it was the "naysayers" who blocked your efforts.

      Just like the idiots who say we are blocking the "movie." Oh, please. Bill has had plenty of time to finish it, plenty of money to do it, he just doesn't want to. It's his intention to bitch and complain about it, and the "corruption" without having to actually DO anything about it. Because--he appears to be somewhat of a cry baby. And could quite possibly still be compiling all his "because I said so evidence" for his own CGJ.

      Delete
    10. re: Arrests - Darash kicked Eric Williams out of NLA because Williams said Darash is doing it all wrong and NLA members are going to be arrested. In the conference call recording Darash posted last week or week before, he says he kicked Joaguin DeMoreta-Folch out of NLA because Joaquin is too extreme. Darash thinks Joaguin is going to end up in prison, like Joaquin's pal Randy Due. Joaquin and Due were involved with Bill and/or Lawless America in early stages.

      It's ironic how Bill and Darash take offense at being called/compared to SovCit's. They both attempt to disassociate with that classification in their own special ways. But Joaquin and Due are following the same basic "attack the courts" plan as presented by Bill and Darash.

      https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/06172014-us-ccc.pdf

      http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020131003A58

      https://ecf.gamd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2014-00071-3-1-cv

      https://www.facebook.com/athenstonight/posts/571430232919506

      See comment: "another eric williams post on jhanies site"
      http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/documents-essays

      Delete
    11. Seems Bill and Darish take offense to being called what they are. It's easier to yell and scream and deny, than to man up. Either embrace the title or STFU. They are the exact same, with the same goals. If the SovCit shoe fits, they need to shove it up their own ass! Embrace it boys! You are what you are, and no amount of denial will even matter in the end.

      Delete
    12. yeah when the FBI agent came to Schied's house and asked him if he is a SovCit he said yes and began to lecture the officer. He at least knows what he is and isn't hiding from it

      Delete
    13. Very true.
      Here's Bill denying some other labels that are facts. "I am not delusional." "I am not Vexatious." "I do not file frivolous law suits" "I am not scurrilous."

      Delete
    14. I was re reading the comments NB posted, and find it interesting that Susan Harbison was the one who slithered over to NLA to point out this blog. She also slithered back over to Bill numerous times to poke him. He listed her as one of his "haters" and demanded a correction and retraction, yet, once he blindly thought she somehow 'saw the light' and was actually back to supporting him, he gladly chit chatted with her. So, she's got several fake names she goes by, and her very own Susan Harbison facebook account it fake. While Windsor is crying about fake profiles to facebook, he is also using those fake facebook accounts to help him stalk and hunt names.

      Its' just interesting how everything is one sided. We aren't allowed to discuss our opinions about what their doing, but they can discuss, and blame us for their failures. I guess, much like they blame the courts for their failures too. I believe Bill knows who "Susan Harbison" really is. She claimed she was part of "GRIP" which means she was part of the plans to take over the Govt, with the whole "Treason to All" plot. No wonder she is so pissy with this blog. While she didn't want Bill leading that "revolution" she probably would like to throw a wrench in Darish's plans too. She is a control freak, which was apparent by her nasty comments about Bill's crappy leadership. Just some thoughts about fake name Susan Harbison and why she's trying to get everyone distracted from their "missions" and focusing on this blog.

      Delete
    15. Great point, Snoozan posts with fake profile & screen name. She also posts as Anonymous. Since she's accused me & apparently advised Bill that I have posted as many as 20,000 comments under anonymous, I hope he doesn't think her slanderous remarks originated from me. Or maybe that was Snoozie's plan, get me blame and sued for what she said.

      Bill had several fake profile followers, not just from the 'likes' from other countries. The only other one I recall of the top of my head is Sweet Pea something.

      LMAO at "slithered", great word choice. Yep, she slithers around just like a snake or a worm.

      Delete
    16. Yeah, remember this?

      "The Big Game - By Funday"

      http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-big-game-by-funday.html

      Delete
    17. Thanks for that ^^^. It was still fun 1.5 years later!

      Delete
  5. Gingersnap picked the most precious part of the whole ruling to quote verbatim.
    LMAO - delusional and irrational in the same sentence.

    The best analogy for this ruling was given in a tiny pic on last post - Bill got splashed! Bravo Booshie, pffft. Whoever the "we" is helping Bill should have told him it won't help his case(s) if he calls all of the US judiciary corrupt. And, less is more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor has several issues. One, he can't take no for an answer thus 7 court actions in MT civil courts, then the usual, "everyone is corrupt because I said so-- because they didn't believe me when- I said so" and two, he is too stupid to know he's being played by those he thinks are really "helping" him. His bitter and vindictive side blinds him at every turn.

      Delete
  6. isn't saying he is delusional, libel I mean we did call that way long ago, we now just have a court confirm it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd say he can cross that word off his list of "libel" complaints.
      Of course, he will just say that court document is void, so...

      Delete
    2. Or, he's going to add Judge Lynch to the Joey Doe 1 - 1000 list and sue him for slander.

      Delete
    3. I believe Judge Lynch anticipates that, thus the injunction.

      I'd say Windsor will never be able to just accept that, just because he believe there is mass corruption, that doesn't make it a fact. Even when the courts gave him time to prove his claims, he failed to do so. Only providing hundreds of pages of his own words, (much like his .com) doesn't make it so. He will never be able to own up to his own personal accountability and responsibility for his--shall we say--broken ethical and moral compus. Much like those he filmed, their claims fall flat on the "merit" scale. IMO

      Delete
    4. Ninja: good points and well stated. He makes stuff up in his head or somebody puts something in his head, and WA LA! Now it's fact in his world!

      Delete
    5. Well, he did get them notarized, so they must be true..

      Delete
    6. I think he's going to sue the judge for defamation and that will take about 900 pages.


      Delete
    7. He'll file a motion to reconsider his motion to reconsider the motion to reconsider the motion to strike the motion to reconsider the motion to consider the reconsider.........

      Delete
    8. There goes another National Forest.

      Delete
  7. That was awesome. I read it three times just to soak in the awesomeness.
    Windsor is in fact a frivolous and vexatious litigant. He does harass people. Through the courts as well as in person. So, don't go cry about it Windsor. It is a fact. The court just re affirmed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read it 3 times too!
      I have so many favorite parts.
      It's perfect. I printed it.
      Those people in Montana are tired of him! I can sympathize with them! He's like an aggravating gnat. It appears to me, Montana swatted his gnatty ass and thoroughly.
      I re-read through his 'Fakebook' page again too, and those of some of his supporters today. His FB friend Vic nailed the part about him being childish. Mr. Windsor doesn't seem to have ever learned 'no', 'stop', or 'how to follow rules'. I see those as very childish for a 'man' of his age.

      Delete
    2. You know...it is SOOOO good, I think someone with a really nice "movie announcer" type voice should read it and put it on youtube or something. I mean, it's got Golden Globe all over it!

      Delete
    3. I wonder how long he will sulk and have his personal tantrum about it before he comes out with the Montana Supreme Court Corruption and I will sue them and expose them rants?

      Maybe we should start a pool about how many hours until he spews forth.

      Delete
    4. LOL I have a feeling he's been mad-hatter-ishly typing it all day. It should go up fairly soon. He's going to need more affidavits! More support! More people to claim shit they have no idea about, but will blindly type away for their fearless leader. (Oh wait, he's been trying to sell that he is in fear the past few days, so that won't work.) Err, Umm Their ______ leader. Damn, I just can't find a word that will work there!

      Delete
    5. Vexatious? Delusional? Frivolous? Worthless?

      Delete
    6. Delusionally 'in fear'!

      "cease and desist!"

      KMc

      Delete
    7. Right now, he is sitting ___ (where does he stay in TX - hotel, apartment?) "in fear," his worst fear exposed - he is worthless.

      Delete
  8. He's truly a disgusting person who thinks the world owes him respect. FOR WHAT? What has he ever done to earn ANYone's respect? He's nothing but a wannabe-someone-famous old guy who had to juice up his many resumes & About Me's--and his now-deleted wiki--with lies and exaggerations to make himself look more important than he is. And when that didn;t work, he's been trying to become famous as a pro se anti-corruption crusader. Again, FAIL, and no doubt he'll fail to get the big fancy farewell shindig his dad did when he passed, but instead, the world will just be quietly relieved by having one less grotesque con man in it.

    And no, Windsor, my opinion here, no matter how you try to spin it (like so many other opinions about you), is not a death threat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think a line will form to pee on his grave. There's a new Windsor money making idea. Ryan can sell tickets to pee on Bill's grave on alcatraz.

      Delete
    2. lmao- so they deleted his wiki page...I wonder if Bill wanted it deleted so he can pretend he is not a limited public figure, or if the Wiki editors just got tired of the hyperbole...

      Delete
    3. As I understood the edit discussion, Bill's page was deleted because it was written for self promotion, which is inconsistent with wiki rules. It's not for advertising either, which is why Alcatraz Media is being discussed for deletion.

      Delete
    4. here's a link to discussion of why Bill's page was deleted

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_M._Windsor

      Delete
    5. Here's a link to the wiki talk about it - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_M._Windsor

      Delete
    6. Ooops. Our posts crossed. :-D

      Delete
    7. How DARE they make Mr. Windsor follow rules! Who DO the think THEY are? Why, Bill Windsor is the most FAMOUS NOBODY (but nonetheless a private citizen and secret squirrel with press credentials) of all time, and everyone on the planet should admit that fact!

      Delete
    8. LOL well, just like what happens in the courts (his, "it's true because I said so") backfired. Wiki couldn't verify factual information. It always pointed to some Windsor written article for self promotion. So, he can't produce any real "evidence" to even back up his own back patting past.

      Delete
  9. Is he going to have to, again, amend his filings?

    I mean, "stalking, vexatious, delusional, frivolous, etc." are no longer slanderous.

    Part of the public record and just as valid as his birth certificate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope - he's going to sue that judge for defamation because he's does not think he is "stalking, vexatious, delusional, and frivolous."

      Delete
    2. Or scurrilous. I just love that one. As I recall, it came from Judge Duffey.

      Delete
  10. It's good to see this guy get what he has coming.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Go scurry away now...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Has anyone ever verified his birth certificate? I mean, he doesn't really seem human. J/K LOL no, maybe I'm not.
    IMHO allegedly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oops, this posted in the wrong spot. It was a comment to Spammy's post @ 9:11
      Oh, 911 hahahahahaha

      Delete
  13. No ice.

    http://www.weather.com/weather/tenday/Kemp+TX+75143

    Maybe he'll show today...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From the spanking he got from Judge Lynch in MT yesterday, I would think Mr. Windsor is therapeutically applying lots of ice to his buttocks today.

      Delete
    2. That's a lot of ice...

      Delete
    3. Captain of the PieTanic and all, I'd say that is fitting!

      Delete
    4. If I knew how to post a picture on here, I would show y'all just how hopping busy the city hall in Kemp is! The police department office is at the back. Think of Mayberry on a hot summer day. Nothing but crickets yesterday or today. I've been to town twice and only car I met? The police cruiser/SUV.
      To have been so mouthy and "in fear"? Mr. Windsor sure did clam up.
      I guess that Montana Supreme Court thing hit him really hard:)

      KMc

      Delete
    5. "The biggest delusional defamation case in the history of mankind..."

      Delete
    6. As measured by sheer paper tonnage...

      Delete
    7. KMc,

      Step 1: Point your browser to tinypic.com

      Step 2: Upload your image.

      Step 3: Copy URL of image and paste here.

      Delete
  14. Windsor Communities

    ReplyDelete
  15. The King is dead.

    Long live the King!

    Http://tinyurl.com/MartyChronicles

    ReplyDelete
  16. So what is the low down on Windsor's lawsuit in Texas? The whole thing is very confusing. Has it been thrown out of court?

    ReplyDelete
  17. shutdown by Cali, as of yesterday, got an Exparte Hearing on 8/11/2014 for permenent injunction

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the info, Anon 4:04, but not exactly accurate--the injunction part was struck.

      https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_FlsKyRGs96b2JjQThyV0pqN1k/edit?usp=sharing

      Delete
    2. Oops...make that Anon 5:04.

      Delete
    3. Actually the hearing in August is still for the injunction. I believe that is what Anon 5:04 meant.
      08/11/2014 9:00 AM DEPT. LM HEARING ORDER STAYING ALL DISCOVERY AND PROCEEDINGS AND ENFORCING PERMANENT INJUNCTION

      Delete
    4. In case anyone's wondering, the attorneys for FB have been sent Lynch's latest ruling. You're welcome.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.