Friday, August 8, 2014

Windsor Has a Bad Week


Reality hit Bill like a ton of bricks this week.  First we had the deposition of Allie where he was unable to come up with his magical smoking gun that would turn the case around.  Then we had the "emergency" meeting on the 5th, this was to get out of the agreed upon meeting on the 6th. Bill's reason for the emergency was he wanted to go stalk Sean Fleming instead and had his hearing for a ridiculous PPO on the 6th.  But the situation in the MO case was much more dire than that for Bill, he knew his time was up.  He had harassed, distracted and eaten up as much time as he could possibly do on Allie and now it was getting to the point where he was going to have to start answering questions.  This is something a coward like him refuses to do.  With that in mind, Bill had a motion in to stay that case (stay being a word he first learned about in the TX case).  This would be his way of saying "I don't want to play any more you guys" but still keeping the case open in case he needed to abuse the case for future terrorist activities.  Well lets just say it didn't go well:

Pro Se Plaintiff appears in person. Defendant appears by attorney Matthew O'Connor. The Motion to Reset the Hearing scheduled for 8-6-2014 is taken up and denied. The Motion for Stay is taken up and heard but results in a moot point as the Pro Se Plaintiff advises the Court that he is dismissing his case at this time.

Judge Rolf said no mas to Bill's games.  Once Bill's poor excuse to change the meeting on the 6th and his stay was denied.....Bill said "you can't fire me I quit" and dropped the entire case.  All his "massive evidence" disappeared into thin air as the reality struck that after all this time and all that discovery.....Bill still can't produce any evidence would back up his insane assertions he made in the original filing.  So in essence, when Judge Rolf calls his bluff.....Bill runs like hell.

Now its on to Michigan where he filed for a PPO, or a criminal trial as Bill and Marty put it, against Fleming for daring to use his 1st amendment rights.  Windsor still hasn't figured out how to spin and break the news to his followers about the huge loss in MO, but here is how he tried to spin the MI loss:

Lawless America. That's when judges don't go by the law. I was denied a protective order against Sean D. Fleming by Judge Karen McDonald in Oakland County Michigan. She said she didn't want to deal with the issue because of the Ellis County Texas lawsuit. But that's a civil suit; this was a criminal charge. The Texas court has NO jurisdiction. At least the judge acknowledged that what Sean D. Fleming has done is stalking under Michigan law.

And Michigan has what's supposed to be the best cyberstalking law. Problem is that it isn't enforced by the courts. So, I'll appeal.

I wasn't surprised, but obviously disappointed. I'd rather have a protective order, but all I have is another story for a movie.


I'm sure its regular practice for sitting judges at a protective order hearing to mention that the applicant has been stalked as they then deny the request.  Thats what Bill wants us to believe. I guess his star witness Marty was never called to the stand.  The bottom line is he lost, once again and now its hard for even him to know where to go from here.

What can Bill do now?  The door was slammed on him in MI, TX is still stayed, FB is ready to destroy him in California if he ever shows up to that case, and now he can't play in MO any more. Is it time to move on with life and recognize that everyone else has the same 1st amendment rights that he has? Of course not, one way Windsor will always be the same....but even with that, he is out of options at the moment.  Will his desperation force him into crossing that legal line that gets him thrown into jail finally? 

142 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Great advice Sluggo.

      Windsor would probably not be in the position he currently finds himself, had he learned this philosophy as a young man. He allegedly lost his family due to this revenge. It is not a justified revenge, therefore he loses even more.

      It's been said many times, that people who want to step into the spot light need to have thick skin. Something Windsor clearly lacks. It's with this thin skin, he manufactures outlandish excuses to justify his attacks on people and businesses but will never hold up in a court of law anywhere --because it lacks merit, and is driven by his immaturity, narcissism, and vindictiveness. IMHO of course.

      Delete
    2. I disagree, Sluggo. Sorry.

      Think of all the new adoring friends he now has - Kpat, Nancy, Mary and of course, Marty Prehn. Full, well rounded and balanced life.

      Oh, and that's P-R-E-H-N for the media...

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. If the real purpose of the case against Allie was to get as much info as possible from her, mission accomplished, time to drop the suit.

      FYI, Allie's judge did not deny the motion for a stay and I doubt he would have denied it.

      Finally, it IS quite common for a judge to comment on what the law does and does not say (re. Michigan stalking), especially where the law in question does not apply to any case that is before the court. Judges like to acknowledge any correct aspect of a litigant's arguments because it lessens the blow of an adverse ruling.

      Delete
    5. Unfortunately, you are commenting without bothering to know the facts. The comment by Windsor about the judge confirming stalking is a complete fabrication. It's amusing how people will blindly back someone without any care about the truth.

      Delete
    6. Hey Snooze Anon @ 12:31 is that you?
      The Judge denied the emergency postponement that wasn't an emergency. The stay was moot since the postponement was the main factor. You don't know if the Judge would have denied that or not had it not been moot, so nice try.

      Finally, your ASSumptions about what the Judge said are quite hilarious considering YOU always want "facts" to back anything stated up. Why is it that you always blindly believe your "Willy?" How come you don't ask him to prove that is what was really said??

      Delete
    7. Someone should notify the clerk in MO, she copied down to order wrong. Susan said so, and we know she can't be wrong just like if her Willy says it, it has to be true

      Delete
    8. Because the truth doesn't serve her purpose.

      Delete
    9. What exactly is her purpose?
      Just an avid Willy Watcher? (yack)

      Delete
    10. @anon 2:38: "Unfortunately, you are commenting without bothering to know the facts. The comment by Windsor about the judge confirming stalking is a complete fabrication. "
      EXACTLY WHERE DID YOU SEE ME SAY I BELIEVE WILLY'S VERSION OF THE STORY?
      MY COMMENT WAS RESPONSE TO THE HOPPER'S SARCASTIC STATEMENT : "I'm sure its regular practice for sitting judges at a protective order hearing to mention that the applicant has been stalked as they then deny the request."
      HERE IS WHAT I SAID, "Finally, it IS quite common for a judge to comment on what the law does and does not say (re. Michigan stalking), especially where the law in question does not apply to any case that is before the court. Judges like to acknowledge any correct aspect of a litigant's arguments because it lessens the blow of an adverse ruling." PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE SECOND HALF OF THAT FIRST SENTENCE. I KNOW YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I AM SAYING, BUT AS ALWAYS YOU ARE THE ONE RESPONDING TO SOMETHING YOU DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND.

      Delete
    11. @12:55: "You don't know if the Judge would have denied that or not had it not been moot, so nice try."

      I'M THINKING THAT MOST PEOPLE UNDERSTAND "I doubt he would have denied it." THAT SENTENCE TO MEAN THAT I DON'T CLAIM TO know WHAT HE WOULD HAVE DONE. SEE HOW THAT WORD "DOUBT" WORKS?

      "Finally, your ASSumptions about what the Judge said are quite hilarious ...you always blindly believe your "Willy?"

      WHEN YOU STOP LAUGHING, CAN YOU SHOW ME THE PART THAT INDICATES I BELIEVE ANYTHING WILLY SAID? NO? I DIDN'T THINK SO.

      AS ALWAYS, THANKS FOR PLAYING!

      Delete
    12. It's a waste of time trying to respond to this SovCit vexatious idiot. She thinks she has vast legal knowledge yet she never once won in court. In her mind, she's never been wrong and never will be. Quite pathetic in her total obsession with this blog. It's really funny when she goes all caps. It does irritate me that my tax dollars pay for her waste of a life.

      Delete
    13. Susan is nothing more than a female version of Bill only on welfare instead of being a trust fund prick.

      Delete
    14. Well stated, Anon 3:05. I agree completely.

      Delete
    15. I agree Anon 3:05. No more feeding the troll. She is clearly not just faceblind, but blind blind. Writes something then tries to side step and make excuses for her bias.

      Delete
    16. I think she's after Bill's "Willy"

      Delete
    17. http://i57.tinypic.com/2u9pn6g.jpg

      Here you go Snoozan...right where you want to be
      (you're obviously suffering with Lap Cow disease).

      Delete
    18. Hysterical. BTW, about a month ago I read an article about an interesting case: a blog owner had gone to court and had gotten an order to force an ISP to reveal the name of a troll who had been disrupting a blog. Snoozan may want to take heed.

      Delete
    19. Aw, I feel so unwanted. ::walks away kicking toe against sidewalk with head down" sniffle sniffle

      Delete
    20. @3:49: Give it your best shot hon! It's all part of the game.

      Delete
    21. Hey Sharon V (as in vexatious) Galloway aka Susan troll? Only you and Windsor are happy with the "Game" The rest of us think it's sick and disgusting that you find joy and humor in making people pay for attorneys when your lawsuit games are all baseless, meritless, colorless and frivolous. Hopefully Windsor forces you to help him pay punitive damages in the end. Oh, he will be paying! Guaranteed!

      Delete
    22. Armchair-ing (and cheering) for her Willy, as always.
      Snoozan not only a cracker jack attorney, she also armchairs for judges!
      "it IS quite common for a judge to comment on what the law does and does not say (re. Michigan stalking), especially where the law in question does not apply to any case that is before the court. Judges like to acknowledge any correct aspect of a litigant's arguments because it lessens the blow of an adverse ruling."
      Why is it Snoozan is way over here with ALL her vast legal knowledge? Shouldn't she be contributing to #Quantaloos?
      Wonders really never cease!

      Delete
    23. Actually, Susan is probably an expert on what judges do when giving an adverse ruling. I'm sure she's seen it in person many times.

      Delete
    24. In light of the economic crisis that the US is in, I say it is a pathetic statement to say it all just "games." Tax payers are footing the bill for these Vexatious and frivolous suits, and that is not even the slightest bit funny Susan. You are a warped and twisted bitch IMO, and so is your Willy. And yes, I think he is a bitch!

      Delete
    25. Susan is holding Bill's hand and leading him even deeper into the vexi hole he's digging. It's only a matter of time until he turns on her. It'll be fun supplying him with her info. She'll soon find out what it's like to be stalked and harassed by the idiot.

      Delete
    26. @ 5:06: LMAO. Yep, all that knowledge about adverse rulings is probably from experience. Which ties in nicely with comment at 4:59. Snoozan is just like the leaders of all the "reform" groups and common law gurus. All of them are great at giving legal advice to people they view as being ignorant. But very few, if any, of their twisted complaints, motions, petitions, writs, affidavits, etc, succeed where it counts - in court.

      @ Ninja: Ditto.

      Delete
    27. "Law suits stimulate the economy!" Seriously Susan? The fact you would say something so ignorant isn't surprising. Pathetic, just like you. I don't need to catch up, I'm not playing your fucked up game.

      Delete
    28. 75 cents of every $1 in my county's budget goes to our law enforcement and judicial system, leaving very little for the rest of the needs in the county. If Windsor were to decide to pull his vexi-ness in my county, it would absolutely NOT stimulate the economy, but would without a doubt mean that other people's legitimate cases wouldn't get the care and attention they deserve while everyone was busy dealing with a known freakazoid (as in: n, adj - a bizarre or very strange person; a person with outstanding or unusual skills but questionable sanity.) If he tries it here, I've got files organized and ready to help them put an end to it quickly.

      Delete
    29. Hey, Face blind bitch Susan, I didn't say I didn't understand, I said you are ignorant. If the Courts love the money so much, then how come there are laws to stop Judicial abuse by Vexatious assholes such as yourself? Piss off you low life skank.

      And fix your hair, you always look like such a disgusting mess.

      Delete
    30. One reason litigation is BIG BUSINESS is because of all the fruit loops filing MERITLESS cases. Along with people who are unable to accept responsibility for their situation.

      Delete
    31. That's rich calling Ninja a moron when it's clear Anon 7:52 doesn't even understand simple economic concepts such as Bastiat's "broken window fallacy."

      Delete
    32. BTW, here's Snoozan's theme song--written by Lilly Allen and dedicated to all Internet Trolls everywhere:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1YEfaldLNc

      Delete
    33. LMAO 9:00, that will help!

      Delete
    34. I'm LMAO too...you see your post?

      Delete
    35. My dedication to Snoozan and trolls everywhere...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0gVkmxUGrk

      Delete
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV5ynRFzrIM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Back at ya, NB...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA7YYub-IUY

      So why pretend
      This is the end
      You'll have to find out for yourself
      Go on ask somebody else

      Why can't you just get it through your head
      It's over it's over now
      Yes you heard me clearly now I said
      It's over it's over now

      Delete
    2. You take the good, you take the bad,
      you take them both and there you have
      The facts of life, the facts of life. "

      Delete
    3. Or, how 'bout this one?

      Another one bites the dust
      Another one bites the dust
      And another one gone, and another one gone
      Another one bites the dust
      Hey, I'm gonna get you, too
      Another one bites the dust

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE

      Delete

    4. And the road becomes my bride
      And the road becomes my bride
      I have stripped of all but pride, so in her I do confide
      And she keeps me satisfied, gives me all I need

      And with dust in throat I crave
      Only knowledge will I save, to the game you stay a slave
      Rover, wanderer, nomad, vagabond
      Call me what you will

      But I'll take my time anywhere
      Free to speak my mind anywhere
      And I'll redefine anywhere
      Anywhere I roam, where I lay my head is home

      And the earth becomes my throne
      And the earth becomes my throne
      I adapt to the unknown, under wandering stars I've grown
      By myself but not alone, I ask no one

      And my ties are severed clean
      The less I have the more I gain, off the beaten path I reign
      Rover, wanderer, nomad, vagabond
      Call me what you will, yeah you will

      But I'll take my time anywhere
      I'm free to speak my mind anywhere
      And I'll never mind anywhere
      Anywhere I roam, where I lay my head is home

      Delete
    5. "Coming Undone"

      Keep holding on
      When my brain's tickin' like a bomb
      Guess the black thoughts have come Again to get me
      Sweet bitter words
      Unlike nothing I have heard
      Sing along mocking bird
      You don't affect me

      That's right
      Deliverance of my heart
      Please strike
      Be deliberate

      [Chorus]
      Wait
      I'm coming undone
      Irate
      I'm coming undone
      Too late
      I'm coming undone
      One looks so strong
      So delicate
      Wait
      I'm starting to suffocate
      And soon I anticipate
      I'm coming undone
      One looks so strong
      So delicate

      Choke choke again
      I thought my demons were my friends
      Getting me in the end
      They're out to get me
      Since I was young
      I've tasted sorrow on my tongue
      And this sweet sugar gun
      Does not protect me

      That's right
      Trigger between my eyes
      Please strike
      Make it quick now

      [Chorus]

      I'm trying to hold it together
      Head is lighter than a feather
      Looks like I'm not getting better
      Not getting better

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfOtrFzAyCw

      Delete
    6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhnfSqVvJZU

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xesdrSwoH8

      Delete
    7. Awe man, now I have a whole new respect for my fav Metallica song.

      Delete
    8. "King Nothing"

      Wish I may
      Wish I might
      Have this I wish tonight
      Are you satisfied?

      Dig for gold
      Dig for fame
      You dig to make your name
      Are you pacified?

      All the wants you waste
      All the things you've chased

      *And it all crashes down
      And you break your crown
      And you point your finger
      But there's no one around

      **Just want one thing
      Just to play the king
      But the castle crumbled
      And you've left with just a name

      Where's your crown?
      King nothing***

      Hard and cold
      Bought and sold
      A heart as hard as gold
      Are you satisfied

      Wish I might
      Wish I may
      You wish your life away
      Are you pacified

      All the wants you waste
      All the things you've chased

      [*--*** Repeat]

      I wish I may
      I wish I might
      Have this wish I wish tonight

      I want that star
      i want it now
      I want it all and i don't care how

      Careful what you wish
      Careful what you say
      Careful what you wish
      You may regret it

      Careful what you wish
      You just might get it

      Then it all crashes down
      And you break your crown
      And you point your finger
      But there's no one around

      [*--*** Repeat]

      [** Repeat]

      Nothin'
      No, you're just nothin'
      Where's your crown, King Nothing?
      No, you're just nothin'
      Absolutely nothin'

      Delete
    9. "For criminal acts and violence on the stage
      For being a brat
      Refusing to act your age
      For all of the decent citizens you've enraged
      You can go to Hell
      For gambling and drinking alcohol constantly
      For making us doubt our parents authority
      For choosing to be a living obscenity
      You can go to Hell
      You're something that never should have happened
      You even make your Grandma sick
      You'd poison a blind man's dog and steal his cane
      You'd gift wrap a leper
      And mail him to your Aunt Jane
      You'd even force-feed a diabetic a candy cane
      You can go to Hell
      You're something that never should have happened
      You even make your Grandma sick
      For criminal acts and violence on the stage
      For being a brat
      Refusing to act your age
      For all of the decent citizens you've enraged
      You can go to Hell"

      Delete
    10. http://youtu.be/Xz9DX_VMXdI

      Delete
    11. Linkin Park--Guilty all the same
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEaEdLQbAFM

      Delete
    12. Marty: Feel free to jump in here with songs from your close, personal friends Debby Boone, Bette Midler or Amy Lee.

      Oh, and Karen Carpenter. Didn't you talk to her just last week?

      Delete
  3. So a few options after the weekly defeats, and why Windsor is so quiet...

    1) Windsor is feverishly typing up an appeal for the MI courts with the standard copy, paste, rant about how wrong everyone on the planet is

    2) He's headed back to TX with his tail between his legs trying to regroup and figure out a new tactic, to get around the stay and get someone to file "criminal charges" for him.

    3) He's now realized that if he continues on in these frivolous suits, he will end up with more court orders labeling him Vexatious, which will go against him for the rest of his life, in any future litigation. He might possibly be going back to withdrawal the TX suit, so he doesn't end up with fines and fees after the Anti-SLAPP is substantiated, owing the "haters."

    4) Then the realization that he now has to come up with another reason as to why he can't continue on making the movie, perhaps claiming liability issues due to the other sides of these "corruption" stories not being given the opportunity to be heard, plus court orders that don't match the stories he's filmed, which he completely ignores.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking of quiet, whatever happened to the resuscitated TalkShoe?

      Delete
    2. I think he took it off life support so he could focus on his vendettas. Those seem to charge him.

      Delete
    3. I think Bill is oblivious to the fact that if he continues his vexi efforts he will be creating "bad law" for himself. I figured he's quiet because he's out of spin for the moment and/or on the road, depreciating that Jeep some more.

      RE: Talkshoe - didn't he say someone advised him not to resume the shows? I wish he would start up again but Darash and Class really are more entertaining.

      Delete
    4. I'm going with he's on the highway to Hell, driving fiendishly!
      And, no, I don't believe he'd dare go back to TalkSnit! One of the disgruntled lemmings or worse, Nancy would call and he'd be forced to speak to them! They might have questions instead of praise! He can't do questions or criticism, we've seen that numerous times. Most recently was little Lippy Larah.

      He'll re-group, add more depreciation to his stalker mobile and lurk the countryside, hoping to enact revenge. Old dogs don't learn new tricks.

      Delete
    5. Highway to Hell is a good one. Where's the video?????

      Delete
    6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKggnBh2Mdw

      Delete
    7. Just read up on Anti-SLAPP, NICE!

      Delete
    8. I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but I would (respectfully) remind everyone this war is far from over, so it's best not to stray far from the foxholes
      just yet. As we've seen so many times before, Windsor is indefatigable in his efforts. IMO, it's not prudent to take Windsor's losses as a permanent
      win. STAY FROSTY.

      Delete
    9. lmao, give him grounds for a new claim, by writing a SINGLE line of defamatory statement, and he can file a new suit against you the same day.

      Delete
    10. In Missouri, another suit can be filed with or without a defamatory statement being made, at any time, on any subject. The previous suit was dismissed without prejudice.

      Delete
    11. this time you can be sure to find out if he has federal leave before hand.

      Delete
    12. He had federal leave last time, but ya that's something everyone should check before responding.

      Delete
  4. Poor MaryD. The woman's in full blown manic mode. She's littered almost every post on Windsor's page with numerous, repetitive, incoherent ramblings, discussing her entire case over and over and over. Holy crap. She needs some serious help stat. Windsor watching this? He's hawking every post, when it's the "haters" posting, yet he will just allow her to spin like she is, without seeing if there is any way he could get her some help? Does this illustrate the exact monster that IS Windsor? He helps NO ONE. EVER.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems Crystal Cox is still up to her dirty tricks. She wrote a Rip off Report about Mary's ex husband to slander and defame him. Once again, ignoring the court documents that support Mary refused to follow the court recommendations to see her children, which would have shown good faith on her part. She rather play victim, than do her part in showing the court she is abiding by their orders.

      Crystal Cox is really something. She should be behind bars IMO due to the harassment and slanderous tactics she has used for YEARS.

      Sure hope Randy Wilson knows what Crystal Cox, and his ex wife, Mary Wilson aka Mary Deneen have been up to.
      http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/randy-wilson-eureka-montana-interbel/eureka-montana-59917/randy-wilson-eureka-montana-interbel-hipaa-violations-lyme-disease-cover-up-discrimi-1125572

      Delete
    2. Yeah, Cox is a viper.
      It'll be interesting watching Cox destroy Windsor when he crosses her, and he will, cross her eventually. They've already had one tiff in which she was quick to blast Windsor via YouTube.
      The next one, won't be just a 'tiff'? It will be some epic internet drama.
      Which VexiVillian will get custody of the lemming MaryD?
      Mary's kids? How much longer before they're old enough to tell Mary themselves that she needs to STFU?

      Delete
    3. At least one of Mary's kids is grown. Mary became a grandmother in 2012.

      http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/vincenzo-cruz-ferruzzi/article_5638d736-2a14-11e2-bc07-001a4bcf887a.html

      Delete
    4. Wow. The way she rambles on, it sounded like they were little kids. Under 10. I'd like to know if they were so deathly ill, how they could be thriving, and having children of their own. Not really, I don't care because she's clearly lying. Just basically an observation to the insanity that breeds in Lawless America.

      Now it's just about smearing the ex husband by any means possible. As if this girl doesn't have the ability to search the internet and see the deplorable things Mary is saying about their father, which they probably can substantiate is un true.

      Delete
    5. Per MaryD's own repeated copy/paste spewage: "She depends on family and friends for support. She cannot provide for her own food, clothing, shelter and health care. She is gravely disabled."
      And? She herself repeatedly spews about being alienated from her children!
      I also thought the children were minors, the way she spins her #corruption tale!
      At least one is an adult, obviously, from link above. Why wasn't the Lyme's transferred thru the placenta to her grandchild? She claimed Lyme's was from her, via the placenta, to her children!! My other question, if MaryD was THAT sick with Lyme's? How did she muster the strength to perform the act resulting in conception?
      She certainly appeared very perky & animated in her video "testimony" given to Windsor. Lyme's is now a come & go condition? Good days & bad? It sure doesn't slow her Facebook & Internet activities!
      **Hi MaryD** I know you read here frequently, how are you feeling today? Is there some reason you adult child doesn't back up your claims, NOW? What would be stopping this adult child of yours from publicly agreeing & supporting your overly repeated allegations? (& the symptoms & the injustices that continue to this day).
      Just a wild guess, here, but could it be the #truth of how you are and what you've really done and not done! as a parent and now a grandparent?
      Being a Loyal Lemming of all things Windsor and Lawless America certainly does make members/followers choose Lawless over their families often.
      MaryD? #PTFD and #STFU already. Life, and all it's joys are going on without you! You're continuing to be cheated as parent/grandparent! Because YOU choose to continue to be a perpetual, vindictive, less than honest Windsor follower!
      Tough choice, huh? Family, love and life OR chanting the Lyme mantra daily for YEARS & supporting #SovCitz #vexatious trash, such as Windsor and Cox! Yup, that's a toughie. How's that working for you? Windsor acknowledging you? concerned about your claims? Concerned about your health? We all know that answer. Just let that sink all the way in, MaryD
      Get ahold of yourself MaryD! You're choosing to miss out on other children growing up while yup copy and paste!
      (PS-MaryD? IF what you claim regarding Lyme's? Could you do something to raise awareness about Lyme's, just help another victim? I know a woman that contracted Lyme's nearly a year ago and she's made a complete recovery! Didn't even sue anyone!

      #LymeDisease #Montana #STOPalready

      Delete
    6. Look, another problem discovered from tick bites. Mary D didn't mention this one, yet.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/10/this-bugs-bite-could-turn-you-into-a-vegetarian/?tid=clavis_1.0_strip_3

      Delete
    7. Give her a minute! She'll read it here & add it to her list of ailments!

      EYE ROLLING

      Delete
    8. I told y'all she's reading ALL the time. She's as addicted to reading here as she is spewing her standard Lyme's/I've been violated blah blah blah.

      Mary Deneen Joey's w invasions of privacy false statements, defamation, libel and slander against me, my minor children, my adult children, and my grandchild.
      2 minutes ago · Sent from

      Derrrrrrrr! It is NOT an invasion of your privacy when it's plastered ALL over the internet!

      #FullMoonFacePalm #NoBigKnifeIcon #JustDuh

      Delete
    9. LMAO, I just read that. I was thinking the exact same thing. How the hell is it an invasion of privacy? The only way anyone knows about her crap is because she and her buddy Crystal plaster it all over the place.

      I'd say maybe she should be a bit more concerned about destroying her children's reputations by all the crap she's put out there, including a video. Did they ask to be humiliated by her? I think not. She is selfish and in need of some help.

      Stop humiliating your children Mary. Your daughters are happy and healthy, just look at them. They aren't suffering like you want everyone to believe. Get over your hatred and anger, and enjoy the rest of your life. You're wasting the precious days being vindictive.

      Delete
    10. "Mary Deneen-- Joeys intentionally lie to hurt others - a hate group full of sickos"

      Really Mary? Please why don't you post the lies? Or shall we post all the places you and Crystal have slandered, libeled, and defamed your ex husband, attorneys and Judges, as well as humiliated your kids? Hummmm?

      Delete
    11. And? Ding ding ding!!! Mary's using her speed surfing skills to switch between waiting for a pay on the head from Windsor & reading along her!! Shitfire! Who wouldn't? It's boring over yonder while he fabricates his newest, outlandish tale!
      Mary? I'll give it to you that you're tenacious! You're gonna ride this tick all the way into the ground. ".....through forced incarceration in a mental hospital while her 1st 4th and 14th amendment rights were violated by proxy through and but doctors in Montana and CA."
      Mary? No one is vile or violating any of your rights! You're wasting your life away obsessing on this rhetoric! Get a hobby! Get a J O B! Volunteer! Do something besides bitch & moan! It could be so much WORSE! Literally, you're blessed & you purposely ignore those aspects & ONLY focus on the blah blah blah.... STOP already!
      If you do one thing? Make a list of the tangible things that Windsor (or Cox) have done to make your life better? You have those relationships with your kids? Your grand kid? If you answer no? Why is that? Is that Lyme's fault too? Or corruption? One kid is an adult!! Fix what you can and prove you aren't a perpetual victim of everything from ticks to online comments to YOUR repetitive online diatribes! I'm not violating or viling anything. No big knife icons.
      Take a HARD look!
      How is what you d been doing working for you? Instead of "taking your country back"? Take your life back and see if everything else doesn't improve!
      #truth


      Delete
    12. Mary, quit obsessing over the blog and just go to sleep

      Delete
    13. Still spinning.
      She's been persecuted & prosecuted, she claims, because of Lyme's.
      She did drop a helpful informative link about Lyme's and ticks. I think she'd be an excellent spokesperson for preventive measures of Lyme's & how to live with it.... Put that spew to good use, instead of broken record copy/paste comments begging for Bill's attention.
      Psssssst! MaryD? If some us didn't like you a little bit? or have empathy for you? You wouldn't get so much as a mention!
      That list? Of what tangible good things that Windsor ever really did for you? Is the list finished, yet?

      Delete
    14. Yeah, Mary wants us to watch this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVzXsKvN2ck


      I'd like Mary to watch this one:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC_lEERJXSA

      Delete
  5. More dangerous to people is this whackjob John Acree who appears to be driving around taking photos of people all over.

    ReplyDelete
  6. John Acree TN will improve since Nashville's elite are about to be wiped out.

    I curious as to how and when John/Don expects the wipe out to occur. I Iistened to Don's testimony to Bill a while back - he's a 2'fer, elder abuse and targeted individual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Another Nutjob on the loose. There are several of them to include Windsor himself who believe they are targeted by the government. Maybe they all belong to a support group. Maybe there is a step program involved. I believe Windsor is paranoid and that is why he never is in one place too long.

      Delete
  7. The top 10 most-corrupt states in the USA revealed in new study

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2721416/The-10-corrupt-states-USA-revealed-new-study-bad-news-live-Mississippi.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dang. I would have bet LA is 1st, IL 2nd. MS is kind of a shocker.

      Delete
    2. ...and you have his "home state" of SD.

      Must be all those strip mall PO Boxes...

      Delete
    3. "home state" as in HOME -- His Original Made-up Environment.

      Delete
  8. Wow--the Missouri case, dismissed! (Clearly I'm days behind in my reading.)

    Well, that's a big win for Overstreet, and really an extraordinarily bad decision by Windsor. It's not as if Windsor was likely to prevail in that lawsuit anyway, but to the extent harassing (one of) his enemies was the point, the suit was working quite well, and it would almost certainly have continued to do so for months to come. Overstreet and her counsel would have needed to do the arduous work of preparing, filing, and arguing a dispositive motion (very likely a summary judgment motion), all of which would likely have been a serious pain in the rear end. Now, the case is over without their needing to lift a finger from here on out. Unless there was more to Windsor's decision process than meets the docket-reading eye, consenting to dismissal seems to me a major strategic blunder. If the point was just to give him time to run to Michigan to take on Fleming, it's simply ridiculous.

    Ms. Overstreet is clearly correct that Windsor can re-file the suit, but that would put him in a significantly less advantageous position than he already was at the beginning of August. Most notably, it brings back the possibility that the federal courts, this time, will refuse him permission to file. (Several things have happened to Windsor on federal-court dockets since the last time a Missouri federal judge gave him permission; quite possibly the next one won't be as deferential.) Just a bad, bad move.

    Windsor clearly has talent in various areas of endeavor, but litigation really doesn't appear to be one of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm just waiting for a lemming to have the audacity to ask "how'd it go?"...

      Delete
    2. Bwahahaha! Hahahahaha!! Thanks @Attorney! You aren't weeks behind, though!
      You're eloquent & articulate wording are perfect above!
      Windsor does seem to really suck at his Pro Se mission!

      #epicfail #VexiAndHeKnowsIt

      Delete
  9. What is a "Copyriught" and does it hold up in court, like say, a Copyright would?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder why he bothered to "Copyriught" that pic. It doesn't look special enough to copy.

      Delete
    2. hahahaha He edited it. Damn "haters."
      You're welcome Windsor!

      Delete
  10. One of NLA's followers got arrested for 'simulating legal process' in Wisconsin. Judy says on Thursday night's conference call that she filed a "Bill Thornton common law court of record case" regarding foreclosure on her home. Darash instructs Judy in the next steps she needs to take, cautioning that she could get arrested again because "this judge is out of control".

    I haven't found her case but I found the law: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/946/V/68

    Darash sounds a lot like Bill - giving Judy legal advice, telling her to sue the judges and attorneys and when her paperwork is rejected that's just more evidence.

    http://nationallibertyalliance.org/files/thursdayrecording/14-08-07.mp3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds so reminiscent of another #SovCitz 'leader' that was giving legal advice via call-in radio, huh? His advice has worked great thus far, Judy, keep doing what he's telling you! He won't be in jail with you.

      #healthyself

      Delete
  11. So a guy with a "anti government" leanings in Dallas set a trap to ambush fire fighters and police officers. This report doesn't mention the guy's politics, WFAA did on their 10 PM news cast. The guy had explosives and an AK-47.

    http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/08/11/dallas-active-shooter-suspect-may-set-ambush-for-authorities/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So far, this much is clear: The man — who Geron says is wearing a blue shirt and a white bandana or towel around his head — appears to be armed with an AK-47, he set off a smoke bomb and, according to a police report, he’s “shooting off propane tanks.” Police say he called 911 to say he was part of the sovereign citizen movement.

      http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2014/08/dallas-police-in-far-north-dallas-where-a-man-with-a-rifle-is-claiming-to-be-a-sovereign-citizen.html/

      Delete
    2. It's a very scary group--those Sov Cits. They are just one step away from going over the line, then there are the follower like ^^^^ who do. They all have the potential of doing illegal stuff, it's just a matter of time. It's far scarier when they turn violent. I'd love to know what group he was following

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I was scouring local news trying to find out what sovcit group, but nothing released yet. No even the guy's name.

      In the mean time, the NLA natives are restless:


      Mon, 08/11/2014 - 20:45
      #4
      MTOakey
      MTOakey's picture

      The question, still unanswered, is just WHO is going to do the arresting and prosecuting resulting from any criminal presentments a CLGJ makes against any, say, police officers for felony charges... right now as it stands NOT one Agency in this State of Florida is willing to do so, arrest a local cop, when there is about 200 pages of facts of evidence of the commission of several felonies AND he has a history of lying and submitting false reports and drug use and the list goes on, ALL documented in the POLICE's own personnel files !!! NOBODY will do their job and obey the Oath they took let alone the State Statutes which give them NO discretion nor their own Agency's Policies & Procedures Manual ...
      Again with the "teeth" {or at least a pair of handcuffs} ???
      We can all stand up and smile all we want and see our teeth in a mirror - 1000 of us can not force someone, UNLESS AT GUN POINT, to do their job.

      Delete
    4. At GUNPOINT? Wow.
      These nuckfutz are eat slap ass up with "it".

      Delete
    5. MT Oakley?

      That wouldn't be one Marti Oakley, the world famous radio host, would it?

      Delete
    6. I thought so too at first, now I think that is a man living in FL.

      Delete
    7. I'm sure she gets a lot of that. Have you seen her?

      Delete
    8. LOL - no, but now I'll have to check her out.

      It didn't take the SPLC long to pick up the Dallas story. The guy alleged to have ambushed DFR and DPD is Douglas Leguin. His name was released around noon today.

      http://www.splcenter.org/blog/

      Delete
    9. One of the TV stations reported that Mrs. Leguin said Mr. Leguin was sending tapes to a friend in KY. So, I was checking out KY sovcit groups and ran across this report of a cop that was ambushed. The murder was a year ago, still no suspects.

      http://abcnews.go.com/US/kentucky-cops-death-threats-colleague-ambushed/story?id=19384295

      Delete
    10. The Ellis Co. suit has been unstayed. Windsor paid $1000.00 as bond and is on a very short leash.

      Delete
    11. Well, Sharon Vexi, when you actually learn how to punctuate correctly (periods go INSIDE quotes-- see Rule 5a -- http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp) I may oblige; otherwise, you'll have to wait until after the FB hearing in CA tomorrow. I wouldn't want to spoil the excitement for anyone.

      Delete
    12. Thought the Google suit was also the TX one. Yes Snoozan, it is, like all of them are-- meritless. Keep up!

      Delete
  12. So… 9 am Sept 19th?? Rumble in the jungle or …?? Billy steps in his own Pie..??

    Who's in??

    Lets have a big BBQ after!!!

    I know where we can find a pig!!

    A really really really big fat pig!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. My, my, my - I hope Snoozie didn't get whiplash when she did the 180 on whether Bill Windsor is or is not a public figure. Well, really I wouldn't care if she did.

    Susan HarbisonFebruary 27, 2013 at 3:48 PM Willy wrote; "I am neither a public figure not a limited public figure."

    I think it would be hilarious if Willy believes he is entitled to the same protection as a private citizen. He gave that up the day he opened LA, inserting himself into a debate about a matter of public concern.

    I know this is OBVIOUS to most.




    NuancesMay 7, 2014 at 2:48 AM

    "Attorney" at 8:10 you merely referenced things BW says about himself, concluding with "after all of that ludicrous posturing, he thinks that he can avoid being found a public figure?" Guess what? Posturing does not = PF.

    Your 8:10 post did not mention a single FACT that will be relevant to the inquiry.

    Your 12:07 post gets a little warmer, but still fails to address the FACTS the court will look for.

    "And such facts as starting political parties and political pressure groups," SO YOU THINK JUST STARTING A POLITICAL PARTY OR BECOMING AN ACTIVIST MAKES ONE A PUBIC FIGURE? REGARDLESS OF THE LEVEL OF SUCCESS OF EITHER OF THOSE ENDEAVORS? WRONG.

    "sending hundreds of pieces of correspondence to government officials nationwide in a vain attempt to get them to pay attention to one's silly crusade, " NOPE, A LETTER WRITING CAMPAIGN DEFINITLY DOESN'T DO IT EITHER.

    "mounting nationwide tours to compile (allegedly over 1,000) YouTube videos starring alleged victims of government corruption," SORRY, PRODUCING A FILM DOESN'T DO IT UNLESS THE PRODUCTION INVOLVES A PUBLIC CONTROVERSY AND DRAWS THE ATTENTION OF MORE THAN JUST THE PEOPLE THAT ARE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN IT.
    "spending years filing both civil lawsuits and criminal charges against officials (including several federal judges) who have dared to cross one, and generally becoming one of the most infamous vexatious litigants in the nation, recognized by courts in at least four federal Circuits and counting."
    NOW YOU ARE REALLY SHOWING YOUR IGNORANCE. THE STUPIDITY OF THIS THEORY IS TOO MUCH.

    "... all of these facts are indications of the manner in which your hero has both sought and acquired extensive publicity (indeed infamy) for himself and his antics."

    SEE IT'S THAT LAST PART WHERE YOU FALL SHORT. WHEN DID HE GET EXTENSIVE PUBLICITY? WHERE CAN I FIND THIS PUBLICITY?

    "Are you seriously asserting that Bill Windsor, for the purpose of the various defamation lawsuits he has filed, is not a public figure?"

    I'M ASSERTING THAT THE PUBLIC FIGURE TEST DOES NOT ASK IF THE PLAINTIFF EVER POSTURED OR ATTEMPTED TO ACHIEVE SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE CAUSED HIM TO BECOME A PUBILC FIGURE.

    DID WINDSOR HAVE MORE THAN A TRIVIAL ROLE IN A PUBLIC CONTROVERSY AND IF SO, WHAT WAS THAT CONTROVERSY?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well! That is indeed a notable about-face.

      Delete
    2. You have to remember, Susan's views are formed by this blog. She believes the opposit of what people here think. It doesn't matter what she thought in the past, all that matters is arguing against what people here say.

      Delete
    3. She's just all around two faced. Talking all kinds of crap about Windsor for the GRIP name fiasco, and his inability to lead any kind of movement yet look at her now...all up his butt on his FB.

      Delete
    4. Lawless America FB Community page today has
      39,985 likes as of today. That sure is a lot of people who "Like" a nobody. Ahahahahaha OMG!! Not a public figure. HAHAHAHAHA ok!! Right.

      Delete
    5. Two? Holy Hell. The one was enough!!

      Delete
    6. 39,985? bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!! That's freaking hilarious! Are any of them from Bangladesh? Celebs?

      Delete
    7. Of course! His notoriety is multi continental.

      Delete
    8. Isn't that your response above? What got deleted? Although I must admit, I hope it gets deleted soon. Your comments are nothing more than a desperate need to argue with someone.

      Delete
    9. All of the ANI's posts should be deleted faster than an IRS hard drive.

      Delete
    10. Or Windsor's Facebook posts!

      Delete
  14. This is a great story in itself and even listen to the great audio file attached at talkshoe where Windsor plans to have public trials.

    http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=710:how-corrupt-judges-and-attorneys-steal-everything-a-person-has-the-jeff-baron-story&catid=121:articles&Itemid=222

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 02/19/2012 05:00 PM EST the talkshoe EPISODE16 at about 1:55:00 into this audio Windsor discusses the public trials after being denied to the normal grand juries. David Schied speaks to him that he is getting the Common Law Grand Jury Assemblies to get them a Texas contact. They want to hold them for Jeff Barron's Judges and more. They all chuckle about the juries and Windsor says they will be looking into them. Fast Forward Spring 2013 same two guys Schied and Windsor planning nationwide Common Law Citizen Grand Juries.

      Delete
    2. Is 2/19/12 the show where Bill says they'll use Craig's list to find jurors for the CLGJ?

      Delete
    3. Bill's more determined associates moved on without him, it seems. On Bill's 3/4/12 Talkshoe, Bill talks to Kelly Mordecai, who wrote a book about grand juries. On NLA's 8/11/14 conference call, Mordecai, Schied and Carl Swensson chat with John Darash.

      Swensson has been critical of Darash, thinks Darash is moving to slow in forming CLGJ. Swensson want's NLA's help to indict all the officials in TN & GA responsible for jailing Walter Fitzpatrick. So Darash instructs Swensson to submit an affidavit and a jury will be formed on conference call held 8/14 to indict them all. Darash says they should all be in jail by Monday.

      Then Schied complains that he has been threatened with sanctions if he files anything else in the courts, says he's been denied access to a grand jury. Darash tells him to submit an affidavit and the Thursday night CLGJ will take up that issue and indict all the judges that have been mean to Schied.

      http://nationallibertyalliance.org/files/mondayrecording/14-08-11.mp3

      Delete
    4. I think Windsor's only reason for being silent on the CLGJ issue is that he's been put on blast. His antics are well noted, as are his associates and their activities. I don't believe he's out, I believe he's flying under the radar for now. He already admitted he had a secret group working behind the scenes in South Dakota. I want to know if that was Paulson.

      Windsor was gathering all these same extremists long ago. I believe in one of those talk shoes about Baron's case ^^^ I heard George McDermott. The same guy that's Snoozan's good buddy and fellow vexi in the wings. Whatever the case, don't think Windsor is in the clear. After some investigations are launched he just might find himself in the hot seat. Just my opinion though.

      Delete
    5. You could be right. I recall that on one of the Talkshoes Bill said he had not thought too much of forming a CLGJ until he spoke to somebody from SD. I don't recall if he gave the name.

      But with all Bill's blathering that "haters" have ruined his reputation, I wonder if some of his early associates now think he's flaky. Walter Fitzpatrick didn't think much of Bill.

      http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=472:beware-of-false-prophets-commander-walter-fitzpatrick-attacks-william-m-windsor&catid=121:articles&Itemid=222

      Delete
    6. Here's a treat. Walter Fitzpatrick trying to arrest a grand jury foreman and then Walter's arrest all on video. I believe Carl Swensson is the narrator.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3Yw3btDBzo

      Delete
    7. Another interesting thought is that Schied said he wasn't looking to lead a group, he was just going to film. Perhaps due to his potential contempt and Windsor's leave issues, they are the one's telling everyone else what to do and how to do it.

      (also another part of that might be, they don't want to get arrested. Both seem like big talking, hot air blowing, all show no go, chicken shits. Screaming how they want their country back, yet not enough to be on the front lines. Put others in jeopardy, then be ready to claim they had nothing to do with anything)

      Delete
    8. As regards 9:04's comments and Bill's denial of connections to extreme anti government groups and formation of CLGJ:

      Walter Fitzpatrick was arrested about 1.5 years before Bill's article on Fitzpatrick's bashing. Bill posted his video testimony of Carl Swensson about 2.5 years after the first TN arrest of Fitzpatrick. Swensson assembled a CLGJ to hear "birther" evidence. Bill publicized his attendance to Swensson's CLGJ hearing in GA.

      Here is Swensson's testimony to Bill, in which he discusses events in TN:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dge1bs9hfY0


      After Fitzpatrick was arrested, Swensson and some oath keepers in GA went to TN to protest and arrest officials. The group was intercepted by TN law enforcement. Here's video of the front lines. The 1st four links are PD dash cam & audio. Swensson was on a hill filming the stop too, his video is the 5th link.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5g9YJKPEHQ

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2ie0Sf9Yok

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eitB8_mz6gI

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KADsfZJ4LkI

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eukvd_x3Id4

      Delete
  15. in talk shoe episode 17 Windsor tells the story about how Alcatraz media was sued by maid of the mist for selling ticket. Windsor talks about how his sons company was already breaking the agreement that Maid of the Mist was doing but he was alright with this until they sued. Seems to me like they were happy with operating under the table until he wanted to be greedy and monopolize the falls boats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Piece of lying, thieving ass scum of the Earth.
      He's lied and scammed so much? He cannot even recall it all.
      It goes way back, per court records. As far back as the 1980s.
      He's a career vexatious scamming liar.

      Delete
  16. Just found this amici curiae brief recently filed on behalf of several organizations currently being sued by Micheal Mann for defamation (Mann is the hockey puck responsible for the Hockey Stick global warming theory). IMO, this brief is both interesting and relevant to the Ellis Co.suit.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2014/08/14/brief-filed-by-media-groups-in-climate-change-case/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What part of that brief do you think relevant?

      Delete
    2. For starters, the part where you get bitch-slapped for being too stupid or too lazy to read it your pathetic, BSE-infested self.

      Delete
  17. Poor Susan is trying to start her victory dance.

    Susan Harbison
    The GENII have been very quiet since the order lifting the stay came out. Maybe they are taking Bill's complaints a little more seriously?
    8 minutes ago

    No Susan, we're still trying to catch our breath from laughing at the mountain of crap he has filed the last two days. It's hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bwaaaaahahahahahaha, more seriously. OK, sure.



      Delete
    2. Snoozan's Mad Cow Victory Dance...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8_nWk4qtAU

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I think your mileage varies greatly. Instead of wasting your time worryin about me, maybe you should get to work helping out with that matrix...

      Delete
  18. I can't comment for #ROTFLMFAO !!!!!!
    Bwahahahaha bahaha! Bwahahaha!

    KMc #SemperFiWife

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.