Thursday, August 21, 2014

Bill Windsor Phones It In



After a string of embarrassing defeats in both Michigan and Missouri, Bill is desperate for some good news in the form of a favorable ruling in the legal world.  Yesterday, his attention turned to his show trial in California of Facebook.


HEARING: MOTION RE: PERMANENT INJUNCTION OR PREFILING ORDER BY FACEBOOK INC 08/20/2014 - 9:00 AM DEPT. PJLM
HONORABLE ROBERT D. FOILES, JUDGE PRESIDING. CLERK: SEAN KANE COURT REPORTER: VALERIE CATHEY PLAINTIFF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR APPEARING IN PRO PER VIA COURTCALL. ATTORNEY(S): JULIE E. SCHWARTZ APPEARING FOR DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. COURTS TENTATIVE RULING INSTRUCTED PARTIES TO APPEAR. MATTER ARGUED BY PARTIES, AND SUBMITTED TO THE COURT. HAVING CONSIDERED THE SUBMITTED MATTER, THE COURT RULES AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANT FACEBOOK INC.S MOTION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF MR. WINDSOR MUST PROVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1923-TWT FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS W. THRASH. - - IF THERE IS A FAILURE BY PLAINTIFF MR. WINDSOR TO PROVE COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGE THRASHS ORDER WITHIN TEN DAYS, THE COURT SHALL DISMISS THIS PRESENT CASE.

It looks like Bill knew this was doomed as the coward didn't even show up to the lawsuit he created. But then again, showing up in court these days runs a high risk of contempt for Bill. Facebook's attorney Julie Schwartz had been schooling Bill in her legal briefs before the court and he was clearly scared of facing her mono y mono in front of a judge. So he phoned it in.

Judge Foiles gave Bill 10 days to do the unthinkable.....get leave in accordance with Thrash's order in order to proceed. At this point you can just hear that phone vibrating as the crazy man on the other end of it starts screaming out "THAT ORDER IS VOID!!!!!!". As always, he can't get leave, his lawsuits are frivolous, in fact he is incapable of filing anything but. I guess he can kiss his dream goodbye of taking a slice of Facebook's "multi-billion dollar" pie. And, once again, Bill is legally destroyed in court by a female attorney which is especially rough on someone like him. Now Bill's vexi tour of frivolous lawsuits in Cali, MT, SD, KS, MO, MI, and TX is now just down to TX where the State motto is "Don't Mess With Texas". Its probably time to find another hobby as nationwide vexatious litigant isn't working out too well.

113 comments:

  1. LMAO @ the pic! The standard "I didn't like that order rant" it's "VOID" hahahahaha

    It is interesting to think about what he'll do now. I mean, really what excuses will he give the lemmings as to why he can't make the "movie," or why none of the DC folks he said they were "putting on notice" have been served with their court actions, or when the "Citizen Grand Juries" are starting. They bought his sob story about "haters" getting in the way, which had nothing to do with his ability to finish the movie or start filing charges on people. He's spent plenty of money this past year on all these frivolous suits, obviously enough to put the film together. So what's next indeed.

    He used to update the lemmings on ALL his court antics (with his own spin of course) but now? It's cricket quiet over there. He amped up the hate towards Allie, and his need to get the Judge to grant more time for depositions, and then he just dropped the case. What about all the MT bitch slapping he's been getting? Again, he made Boushie the star of the "haters" for a year, and now, again, cricket quiet. Oh how to spin this now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure he's updating them behind the scenes on how he had to drop some cases to focus on the bigger case in TX.

      Delete
  2. Awwwww, isn't that just pitiful?
    He was busy on the phone getting his earful of Vexi disappointment!
    10 days, eh?
    Time sure flies!

    Life IS good! Much respect to Julia in Cali!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ignorantia legis neminem excusat...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Via vexilitigator dura est.

      Delete
    2. (The way of the vexatious litigant is hard).

      Delete
  4. As I as scanning the headlines over on Drudge, my eye caught a tee about a story on police cars in NYC being vandalized. The line began, "a smear of human feces." I immediately thought to myself, "hey, what's Billy doing in New York?"

    ReplyDelete
  5. WillyBill hasn't forgotten about his long list of others on his s#%$ list? He'll keep filing and continue to make a fool of himself until finally a court incarcerates him. He can't tame his addiction and he will never gain insight into his bizarre need to litigate stupid stuff, mostly concocted and without reason or logic, that doesn't belong in any courtroom setting. The decent people he made failed promises to need to step up and take action against him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor's made up drama from walking away from his family in comparison to parents who lost their children to the for-profit schemes related to courts, children who are now either ramped up on psychotropic drugs or dead, is sickening. He's a true mental case. Who does that? He used good people from within the system like the retired Federal Court Judge and the LA attorney who were honest and truly good people wanting to change the system for his own demented quest to prove, in fact, that the system actually works when a nutcase kicks and screams like a little baby for no plausible reason. They will shut you down, Mr. Windsor. You're a selfish idiot and you deserve to look like the fool you truly are.

      Delete
  6. HEARING: MOTION RE: PERMANENT INJUNCTION OR PREFILING ORDER BY FACEBOOK INC
    08/20/2014 - 9:00 AM DEPT. PJLM
    ===
    COURT FINDS WILLIAM WINDSOR WOULD QUALIFY AS A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT UNDER C.C.P. SEC. 391(B)(3) (BASED ON THE DECLARATION OF JULIE SCHWARTZ, AND THE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" THROUGH "D," MR. WINDSORS FILINGS IN FEDERAL COURT, AND MR. WINDSORS DISCOVERY REQUESTS IN THE PRESENT CASE).
    COURT SIGNS PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL.
    ENTERED BY S KANE ON 08/20/14.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting. The discovery requests to the defendants in the TX case are far worse and more frivolous. He should end up on the TX Vexi list I would imagine.

      Delete
    2. Oh he will. And wherever else he files.

      Delete
  7. Will be interesting to see how this is presented to the lemmings. I am sure he is telling them that he is dropping some cases to focus on the "big case" or something close to that.
    ======
    Case CIV526302 - WILLIAM M WINDSOR VS FACEBOOK INC

    HEARING: MOTION RE: PERMANENT INJUNCTION OR PREFILING ORDER BY FACEBOOK INC
    08/20/2014 - 9:00 AM DEPT. PJLM

    HONORABLE ROBERT D. FOILES, JUDGE PRESIDING. CLERK: SEAN KANE COURT REPORTER: VALERIE CATHEY
    PLAINTIFF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR APPEARING IN PRO PER VIA COURTCALL.
    ATTORNEY(S): JULIE E. SCHWARTZ APPEARING FOR DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC.
    COURTS TENTATIVE RULING INSTRUCTED PARTIES TO APPEAR.
    MATTER ARGUED BY PARTIES, AND SUBMITTED TO THE COURT.
    HAVING CONSIDERED THE SUBMITTED MATTER, THE COURT RULES AS FOLLOWS:
    DEFENDANT FACEBOOK INC.S MOTION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS GRANTED.
    PLAINTIFF MR. WINDSOR MUST PROVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDER IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1923-TWT FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS W. THRASH.
    - -
    IF THERE IS A FAILURE BY PLAINTIFF MR. WINDSOR TO PROVE COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGE THRASHS ORDER WITHIN TEN DAYS, THE COURT SHALL DISMISS THIS PRESENT CASE.
    - -
    COURT FINDS WILLIAM WINDSOR WOULD QUALIFY AS A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT UNDER C.C.P. SEC. 391(B)(3)
    (BASED ON THE DECLARATION OF JULIE SCHWARTZ, AND THE ATTACHED EXHIBITS "A" THROUGH "D," MR. WINDSORS FILINGS IN FEDERAL COURT, AND MR. WINDSORS DISCOVERY REQUESTS IN THE PRESENT CASE).
    COURT SIGNS PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED BY DEFENSE COUNSEL.
    ENTERED BY S KANE ON 08/20/14.
    =====================================

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the last paragraph (it wasn't posted yesterday).

      As we've been over many times on this blog, CA's statute "grandfathers" in Vexatious Litigant status.

      California Code - Section 391

      (3) In any litigation while acting in propria persona, repeatedly files unmeritorious motions, pleadings, or other papers, conducts unnecessary discovery, or engages in other tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.

      (4) Has previously been declared to be a vexatious litigant by any state or federal court of record in any action or proceeding based upon the same or substantially similar facts, transaction, or occurrence.


      [http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/CCP/3/2/3A/s391]

      Delete
  8. Pie Man Zombie HunterAugust 21, 2014 at 1:36 PM

    I got papers today from him, Motion to Stay in KS..... he lied and said I am on the Texas case and used a play on words making it look like, he won in Allie case..... Sending a copy to Sean's Lawyer in Texas and a copy to someone in the clubhouse...... with my Motion for him to wear a clown suit with a tutu and a man bra

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure Ms. Overstreet would be happy to supply you with the relevant documents to the court in KS to prove Mr. Windsor dismissed the MO case on his own accord.

      As you're in KS, I would suggest you amend your motion to include ruby slippers.

      Delete
    2. hahahahaha a motion for a stay in a court which hasn't even had a single hearing yet....so in MO he says you cant fire me I quit and in KS he says since you won't respond I hereby order this case stayed

      Delete
    3. Ok, so he sent you a motion for stay, but there doesn't seem to be an order from the court. That Judge seems to be ignoring the Vexatious Litigant completely.

      How is it that Windsor manages to send you court documents, yet evades service from you to him in the CT case? He's such a douche

      Delete
    4. Pie Man Zombie HunterAugust 21, 2014 at 2:19 PM

      CT laws said they need to be serve hand to hand or person to person..... Willy hides in a Mail box, which is why...... I have made it very clear in KS that Willy owns and filed for a hold to the name AMPP, just to start this Lawsuit and I was the one who made the other mail box companys drop him because if I can not serve him I would serve them

      Delete
    5. Well, you know where he will be in person on 9/18 or 9/19. Have him served there.

      Delete
    6. Pie Man Zombie HunterAugust 21, 2014 at 2:31 PM

      good idea, thank.... I will call down there today

      Delete
    7. He's in that clerk's office often. Lemme tell you, they did some major eye rolling when I went! Very professional, though.
      The clerks in Ellis County District Court made it abundantly clear that THE only address of record for Windsor that the 40th District in Texas is recognizing and that ALL copies should be sent to? The PO Box in South Dakota. I had clerk repeat it twice to make certain. SOUTH DAKOTA.
      In his umpteen motions, was one for a change of address. That? Has not been seen, much less approved.
      I'll serve him for free. It would be my pleasure. If it is allowed. Matter of fact? I'd be delighted to do it. D E LI G H T E D.
      Lemme know.

      #SemperFi

      Delete
    8. Sorry Susan, I didn't make that comment. I use my name when I have something to say. As far as your question, you should ask Bill. He thinks he knows all about me.

      Delete
    9. Bwahahahahahahaha!!! "Bill thinks______". Good one! No, he doesn't, not well or he wouldn't have the losing track record simple Google searches will pull up.

      #Delighted

      Delete
  9. Good giggly wiggly! Are y'all seeing the Nancy spin on Windsor's page?
    One woman is thankful for our #freedoms. Not Nancy! Mike did it!

    Lynn Maris (Graphic, May be triggering, keep volume low) Family Law Judge, William Watkins drew controversy for sending a 62 year old disabled man with 1 leg to jail over a child support issue, he told a woman seeking a domestic violence restraining order to "shut up" and berated her in court, he failed to file timely motions..and yet he is never disciplined. This is what got Judge Watkins off the bench. This hearing is unbelievable, also go to 5:32 when the judge throws Mr. Hage's chauffer out of the courthouse..Mr. Hage goes on to say that he is so poor that he does not eat (?!) Which results in the Judge cussing him out some more: http://youtu.be/APD4a347bPQ
    August 19 at 10:19pm · Edited

    Lynn Maris Arthur Hage talked to a reporter about his case, the Judge warned Mr. Hage not to discuss the case. The reporter takes a picture of Jude Watkin's home-- The Judge begins to scream and calls Mr. Hage a "stalking piece of sh--". The ex wife is just sitting there and her attorney is playing with her hair! The West Virginia Supreme Court on March 26 suspended Putnam County, W.Va., Family Court Judge William Watkins III without pay until December 2016, citing 24 violations of the state’s judicial ethics rules…Even though he has no cases and no compensation for the next three-plus years, Judge Watkins still technically holds his judicial office. http://abovethelaw.com/.../judge-of-the-day-old.../...
    August 19 at 10:18pm

    Nancy Evans It is good news that they did something. As opposed to New York. Which is totally Lawless.
    All the way to Albany. Phony employees. Astonishing what is going on.
    I ignore it now. I just want out of New York.
    August 20 at 9:00am

    Kerrie Karlo If you think NY is lawless you should leave. Are folks being tortured and beheaded for sharing their thoughts and opinions. ?
    we should all be thankful for our American freedoms and think twice before throwing catch phrases like "lawless" around.
    2 hours ago

    Nancy Evans I would leave right this minute. If I could.FYI.
    33 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Lawless = Fake Presidents making Stupid Decisions. That are ruining my country. That my ancesters faught for. Not on the dirty side.German Nazis. Losers who STILL wont accept the fact.That we won the war. Because we are BETTER than them. Do I want losers running our country? No way.
    30 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Lawless = Home Invasions by dirty, overpaid untrained Police Officers. Based on orders from a Police Cheif in Suffolk County. Who in fact. Does not even exist. Except maybe on the Payroll. Over $200.000 per year. Who is pocketing that $200.000. That is coming out of the taxpayers pocket?
    27 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Lawless= your ex answering and filing answers to your court priceedings. After giving the judge you went before. A Satisfied Mortgage. Fannemae. Take a peek at the number of mortgage filings your Judges have. Just for curiousitys' sake. You be be shocked.
    22 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Lawless is your ex having Suffolk County Police officers New York. Stalk you. Pull you over for no other reason. Then the fake police cheif =My ex. Gave them orders to do so. Then you discover you recieved tickets also like the court orders. Written by your Stupud ass ex.
    20 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans He makes fun of himself as the fake cheif of police. By geeting drunk in his cop car. Having a Hooker with him in that cop car. Engaging in sex with that Hooker in the Squad Car. EWWWWW. How gross is THAT..?
    18 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Makes this all public. No shame at all. Lost his Gun..not once TWICE! Our police in Suffolk are as idiotic as the County legislater.Appropriately name Beloney. Another version of Burke the CHEIF OF POLICE. Cheif of Idiots.
    15 minutes ago

    Nancy Evans Mostly the same guy in disguise. I know because I know what to look for.
    14 minutes ago

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kerrie will be deleted! Then blocked.

      Delete
    2. Yea Kerrie pointed out the obvious fact that none of the Me the People types are allowed to say. Doom and gloom is what they are selling

      Delete
    3. Nuttier than squirrel turds, I tell you what...

      Delete
    4. Nancy is now working through the 12 Step program on that thread. She's hung up on 4.
      That's just sad. Where is AssRag? Could he help a loyal lemming? Uh, no. Totally ignore her. He's such a POS. She's literally begging for anyone to respond to her now. He should be so ashamed!!!!

      Delete
    5. "Where is AssRag?" Up his ass and around the corner. Has he ever offered anyone help? Hell no. I have never seen anyone so self absorbed and out of touch than Windbag. Never comments to anyone unless it's to reprimand a decenter, or get his kudos. Oldass ugly man, inside and out.

      And Nancy? Her interpretation of the 12 steps is about as accurate as her belief everyone is Mike, or whatever person she thinks Mike is now. She is completely oblivious to reality. Not helping her when she is so clearly in need of help, is just more proof of the disgusting beast that is Windsor. He wants their support, but that help is clearly a one way street.

      Delete
    6. "Nancy Evans Step 4? Been a while. I remember step 4 being very important. Hmmm 4th Step Inventory comes to ny mind. Done those private sessions in AlAnon.
      Yesterday at 11:25pm
      Nancy Evans Admited to myself, God and another human being. The exact nature of my wrongs. ?? I think
      Yesterday at 11:26pm"

      Google search says that's Step 5.

      But what do they know...

      Delete
    7. "Nancy Evans Ready?? Not a matter of readiness. As I am already IN.Working that program for over a decade. Not a decesion at this point. Just a way of life. Same thing as tying your shoes. Something you just DO. No thinking involved. You use your tools as needed. Works if you work it.
      1 hour ago
      Nancy Evans It has to become a part of YOU.
      1 hour ago"

      Whoa. If she's the finished product, I'd rather be abusing...

      Delete
  10. williammwindsor.com an upcoming website.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm going to start my 12 steps with admitting I have a problem and I am powerless over something. I think Kpat is funny. I know, I know, he's got 99 problems, but being funny ain't one. What was step 2 again?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yoohoo david Webb so do you know who Larry klayman is?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh brother. Is he really still trying to throw Scientology into this frivolous court crap? Using the verbiage "some people" to distract that he is the "some people?" Then posting a completely irrelevant article and watching all his conspiracy weak minded lemmings twirl? SMH He is so pathetic. Got nothing to tell the lemmings, so he just throws out useless crap to keep them hanging on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm Methodist!!!
      We've been over this.
      Duh & duh.

      ♛ ℗ ❥

      Delete
    2. His court antics are conspiratorial, don't ya know.

      Delete
    3. OMG hahahaha Yes Lynn, if anyone is "setting people up" so the Scientologists to attack you, it's your good buddy Windsor. He's the only one throwing them into his delusions.

      Lynn Maris...."they could be setting people up to blame Scientology so we get attacked by Scientologists."

      Delete
    4. While Billy's most likely a few days away from the agony of defeat in CA, the lifting of the stay in the Ellis Co. has defendants already filling motions to dismiss (He got the anti-SLAPP down on him today). Poor Billy.

      Delete
    5. Oh, but Billy will concoct yet another cover story for how he was victimized by the court and the Joeys and Scientology and Freemasons and Satan and ... and ... and.... All said and done, he will go down in history as the fraud/serial liar that he is.

      Delete
    6. Pleadings from a serial liar..."it stays crunchy in milk, I swear."

      Delete
    7. Billy Windbag gots back on Wikipedia? Wha? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cap'n_Crunch

      Delete
    8. Useless crap, that's about right. How did he connect Scientology to this issue???? He's just making stuff up. This is about atheists complaining about plaques put up schools when they were built 17 years ago in a community of about 3,000 (at the time) Protestants.

      Delete
    9. It's the great Windsor spin. Semantics, word play, games, games, games. I believe there were only two lemmings that noticed the article had nothing to do with Scientology. This pretty much sums up how Windsor works. Put random information out there, in the same post, and people assume it's all connected.

      Windsor is the Master of Delusion.

      Delete
  14. http://www.times-herald.com/local/20140816common-law-grand-jury-follow#fb-com-container

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill would say that's defamation. He isn't a soveirgn because he doesn't wear the badge

      Delete
    2. That article is a little short on research and details of NLA. It indicates NLA's ideas come from the 17th century, but Darash leans heavily on the Magna Carta. The ADL might not show any links between NLA and the sovereign state movement, but one has only to listen to a few of Darash's lectures or conference calls, the links are obvious.

      Delete
    3. I'd say it's the same for Windsor. He can claim he isn't a "Sovereign" but all his articles and talkshoes before he launched LA, and some after, mimic the same rhetoric. Windsor's badge? Is it his "V" label, or his "Lawless America" logo. (that still isn't trademarked?)

      Delete
    4. It seems Windsor and Darash reject the "sovereign" tag because they don't advocate killing cops. And neither of them thinks their views are extreme or anti-government. Well, that and Bill now says he never supported the CLGJ. But their ideology and general approach with respect to "coming to power" are the same (writing letters, filing law suits, arresting judges, etc.).

      re: sovereign states - Darash believes in order of importance are the rights of "we the people", the states, then the US government. He sort of explains his view at the first of Thursday's law lesson.

      http://nationallibertyalliance.org/files/thursdayrecording/14-08-28.mp3

      (Note to Darash, if he ever reads here: Nobody can move from New York to Texas and be a Texan when their feet touch the ground. It just doesn't work that way. Ever. What you have in that case is a New Yorker that is just living in Texas.)

      Delete
    5. That link is two hours long. Where is the Texan part?

      Delete
    6. Here's a question: If you were not born in Texas, but was raised, educated all the way through college, married and had children, a home, real estate, several businesses all in Texas, what does that make you?

      Delete
    7. Sounds like you got here as soon as you could. You're a Texan now.

      Delete
    8. Well, I was afraid of that...that's Bill Windsor's bio...He's a TEXAN, unfortunately (to the delight of Georgia and every other state).

      Delete
    9. He didn't fit in around here so he left as soon as he could. That's why now he's a SD resident.

      Delete
    10. Yes, the state of SD -- Stupendously Delusional.

      Delete
  15. Seems the desperation to stay relevant is plaguing the Windbag. Trying so hard to find news articles about stories that will spark interest with the dangling lemmings.

    Unfortunately for him, all he is doing is validating that when there are issues, they get resolved. So, with that, his "issues" that he believes remain unresolved...are only unresolved in his mind. No "corruption," just an angry toddler, trapped in an old man's body.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So, Bill's appeal of the MT case to the 9th Circuit Court was dismissed on 8/26.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From PACER: ORDER of USCA DISMISSING as to 38 Notice of Appeal filed by William M. Windsor (APP, ) (Entered: 08/26/2014)

      Delete
    2. Thats what happens when you are a moron who files an appeal before there is even a judgement… kinda hard to appeal nothing, unless you are a vexatious idiot.

      Delete
  17. So what's the latest in the Texas and Kansas cases?

    ~Allie Gate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't know what's going in a case where your a defendant also? SHM

      Delete
    2. Oh, I'm still a defendant in one of those? I hope it's Kansas, that's a lot closer drive. DOH!

      Delete
    3. Your not a defendant in the ellis county suit? I'm sorry maybe the copy I read was wrong. Can you say one way or another.

      Delete
    4. No I can't say one way or another. I don't read here much anymore and this is the only place I was reading information about those cases.Y'all have a good Labor Day week!

      Delete
    5. The next hearing (first one since the stay) is on the 19th. Several defendants have in motions to dissmiss and bill has filed a bunch more stupid stuff. Kinda par for the course

      Delete
    6. Attention to all, Allie Overstreet is a Defendant in the Ellis County case #88611. I thought I would remind her she is . You know Allie, maybe you were having one of those stupid moments. You appear to have them quite often. Would be interesting if that Missouri Dismissed without prejudice case is re-opened.

      Delete
    7. Go look up sarcasm. Let me know what you find

      Delete
    8. Why do you keep defending the very same kind of person who probably has worked with the same guy you write about everyday? Seriously you need a gut check of who is really trying to help you out. Sometimes I wish there were discovery going to happen. Maybe then things could be sorted out here. Anyone who asks like she did was imho not sacasm but someone who is flaunting they are believing they are not involved anymore for some reason. Maybe I will write an affidavit about what I know truly and send it in. It will probably be in support for windsor and against AG.

      Delete
    9. Who is helping who? What are we playing teams or something? You sound just like Windsor. So yea write up whatever you want. Free country and all

      Delete
    10. NP Perez Hilton.

      Delete
    11. Gingersnap is Perez Hilton? Oh wow

      Delete
    12. Where's Spammy when you need him? 7:26 obviously needs a look at your "Your v. You're" tinypic again.

      Delete
  18. One of the defendants in the Ellis Co. Texas action has filed a motion to dismiss based on the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (TCPA), Chapter 27.

    Here are some of the highlights:

    The statue allows a judge to dismiss frivolous lawsuits filed against one who speaks out about a "matter of public concern" within the first 60 days. "Matter of public concern" is defined expansively in the statute.

    The Anti-SLAPP motion is supported by affidavits explaining to the court that the lawsuit is based on, relates to, or is in response to one’s exercise of his right to free speech, right to petition or right of association.

    The burden of proof is initially on the party who files the Anti-SLAPP motion to establish (by a preponderance of the evidence) that the lawsuit was filed in response to the exercise of his First Amendment rights. Then the burden shifts to the plaintiff to establish (by clear and specific evidence) a prima facie case for each essential element of the claim.

    The statute creates a stay of discovery in a lawsuit while an Anti-SLAPP motion is pending and/or appealed. The court has discretion to order discovery pertaining to the motion if it feels it is necessary.

    The statute provides for mandatory fee shifting when a party wins an Anti-SLAPP motion so that the person or entity wrongfully filing a lawsuit must pay the defense costs. There is a discretionary fee award if the Court finds that the Anti-SLAPP motion was frivolous or brought solely for the purpose of delaying the proceedings.

    The statute provides an immediate right to an expedited appeal if the Anti-SLAPP motion is denied.

    (Stay tuned...this case is going to get Spockishly fascinating).

    Source: http://slappedintexas.com/primer/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More than one defendant has that dismiss motion filed of course.

      Delete
    2. Before or after 11 Aug (lift of stay)?

      Delete
  19. Finding it interesting that on Aug. 16th, Windsor told the lemmings he couldn't be bothered with FB due to his flinging frivolous discovery requests to the joey's and others. Interesting when the Judge made it perfectly clear that no discovery/production would be done until after the hearing on Sept 19 mapping out how things would be done then.

    Does anyone else see how the comment Snoozan made a while back, about "games" and "Windsor not expecting to win any of these cases" is starting to unfold? His premature filing of an appeal in MT for a "recommendation" was laughed out of court, from a man who has stated he knows more than Judges and Attorneys--that wasn't an oversight, imo, he did that on purpose to stall.

    Harassment, retaliation, and a vindictive vexatious litigant, who uses the courts to carry it out. He is banking on the judges who have to follow the law, when he can play the indigent pro se--duh--can you explain that to me judge--like he's done in the past.
    Bad faith filings. All of the cases. End the game, he's a sick SOB.

    He's tired of his lemmings. That game has been over for well over a year now. He's milked the whole "hater" story too long. The only ones who believe it now, are the really sick lemmings, the conspiracy nuts that he doesn't even like, yet tolerated so they didn't turn on him. It's over. He's spun himself into a corner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just hope the anti-SLAPP dismissals are granted. It would be justice, IMO, if the people Windsor is harassing are awarded attorney fees. It might be like trying to drain blood from a turnip but at least their would be judgements against him. That pointless trip to the 9th Circuit cost Windsor $505, clearly he is not without resources to waste.

      Delete
    2. Windsor can sure try to say he's got no money, but it won't fly. If the courts take into account the amount of money he's spent on litigation, filings, appeals, jury fees, etc. this past year, there is no possible way he can claim he's broke. Pretty sure a Judge would agree to order a financial forensic audit if he really tries to be a douche bag. I think that's why he divorced Barbara. In one of the video's he made in KS, he pretty much came out and said Barbara was worried she'd have to spend all her money fighting the Claudine Dombrowski's, Allie Overstreets, and Sean Boushies. I'd say, that seemed to be a touch of saying a bit too much.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eps-zBcUDao&list=UUhwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ

      Then we have this little tid bit: Under donors for Delta Shelter Club ($15,000 - $24,999) William M Windsor
      http://ttudelts.com/epsilon-delta-of-dtd-shelter-contributors

      Delete
    3. Thanks, I don't think I saw that video before. Funny, none of the people blamed for his marital discord live in TX or had anything to do with this blog before Bill brought attention to it.

      Delete
  20. NLA is sending this doc to 150 courts today. Darash says don't call them "sovereign citizens" but says they are sovereign people, they are not terrorists or mentally ill. Just like Windsor, Darash doesn't seem to think threatening the entire US judiciary qualifies as terrorism.

    http://nationallibertyalliance.org/files/mondayrecording/14-09-01.mp3

    ReplyDelete
  21. AP-Over the weekend, nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence and several other female celebrities and athletes were leaked on the internet. The photos were probably hacked from Lawrence's and her fellow celebrities' phones and computers without their consent.

    In other news, a man in his 60's, residing in the Dallas Area was reportedly treated for injuries to his palms. No other information was immediately available.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard he was spotted here…

      http://www.city-data.com/businesses/810449975-lido-adult-theatre-dallas-tx.html

      Probably through the glory holes.

      Delete
  22. OK, so I was listening to part of the NLA Monday night call, it was...uh...spirited. The VA state coordinator challenged Darash, he bowed up & she quit. She posted a comment with a link to her blog talk show, so I listened to her side of the issue. Her guests were Dr. Edwin Viera and Aaron Bolinger.

    I didn't think much of either Viera or Bolinger based on some of their associations. But, I have greater respect for both men now. They discuss why groups like Lawless America and NLA are inherently doomed, an explanation of the militias as relates to the Constitution and they have intelligent ideas on how to affect change and reform within the existing system. The relative discussion starts at about 50 minutes.

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/constitutionambassadors/2014/08/31/replay--conversation-with-dr-edwin-vieira-and-red-beckman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just make him go awaySeptember 2, 2014 at 10:23 PM

      Uh, OK I'll watch..hopefully I can FF..... but saying Lawless America is doomed, isn't it dead already?

      I mean really...... isn't 100-200 people a homeowners association?

      Delete
    2. Yep, my point really was directed at Windsor. He wants to blame the "haters" for the failure, but the revolution, movie, movement, whatever, never had a chance past what Windsor did. All the CLGJ groups seem to fail at exactly the same point. Viera & Bolinger gave the best explanation I've heard, based on the Constitution and our laws, for why the CLGJ is not a good idea, why it won't work and why it shouldn't.

      Delete
    3. I don't recall which one said it but one of them said he won't have anything to do with CLGJ groups. He said what those groups are doing are feeding into the SPLC calling them all terrorists, they give "Constitutionalists" a bad name. I agree. I thought they were basically all the same anti-government extremists. But, what I heard from those two "Constitutionalists" is a far cry from Jon Roland's interpretation of the Constitution.

      Delete
    4. I am still really stuck on the fact that after DC, where Windsor got his standing ovation and or roaring cheers for his "treason/death penalty" comments, when he promised the lemmings that he was giving 30 days for everyone to respond and investigate their complaints--then they would be filing charges--what happened to that? That was long before he turned his attention to the "haters."

      I really think he got in over his head, and saw what happened to Paulson (who was his right hand or close to it for a while) and needed an excuse to pull out before he got arrested himself. That's just the way I see it. He was balking for years with Schied and others about the CLGJ, then it came down to the ultimatum from DC, 30 days or else--and zip, nada, nothing. Big promises and zero return.

      Much like I see with the "movie." Still big promises but fact is, he told everyone the documentary would be done by now. Even before he launched his multi-state lawsuits, he moved the airing date several times. Forgot to tape the back stories, didn't interview the "other sides" of each story, like he said he would. How many excuses is he going to use to get out of something that he was clearly in over his head promising in the first place? SMDH so sick of him and his semantics, blaming games, tantrums, arrogance, vindictiveness, harassment, and lies.

      Delete
  23. If the tx case does get into discovery cross examination of affidavit writers, other witnesses he provides and his repositioned friends will be done. Along with the deposition of himself and others. Just think how much information will come out about this entire lawless america movement. I heard there are already some affidavits sent in and one says that he filmed but had no professional or business relationship with lawless America. Sounds like a Bill feels differently about them then they do about him. Since some might have gone to DC I am sure they would be credible witnesses for the Video they might all be in where they clap with windsor after he states about the death penalty for those who commit treason and the evil plan to take those whom are executed offices. This may get interesting. The Sheriff might have to be on hand to make arrests.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're not fooling anyone posting as anon!

      Delete
    2. "The Sheriff might have to be on hand to make arrests"...who for what? Those are/were just a bunch of people exercising their rights under the 1st Amendment. We might all be horrified and in complete disagreement with the plan, but unless somebody tries to citizen's arrest, try and execute a judge for treason there is no crime.

      The affidavits are a whole other issue. I doubt the TX case will get so far, but oh boy would I have a list of questions for each affiant. Starting with I want to see the request and the 'write a flattering essay' instruction form Windsor sent to each one.

      Delete
    3. " I want to see the request and the 'write a flattering essay' instruction form Windsor sent to each one."

      Exactly. I thought the exact same thing. I believe there are screenshots from his previous request for affidavits in another case, but this one clearly went behind the scenes. Does anyone believe some "coaching" went into this? I sure as hell do. Did he send a template like last time? Oh, and then the other thought I had was, what is the mental stability of the affiant? I mean, did they say they were deemed mentally unfit by someone? Ordered to take say, "Depakote" and refused? oh, the list of cross examination questions will be quite something I'm sure!

      Delete
    4. Only one person on the TX list appears to fall into the mentally unfit category, he also falls into elderly abuse and criminal complaint categories. The others are typical LA 'they done me wrong' stories. Which raises another question - was Windsor more selective in soliciting these affidavits? And why is it there are no affidavits from life long friends or business associates?

      Delete
    5. Good question. I am thinking from what he said in DC, that none of his former friends and associates would donate to his cause, so he unfriended them all, that they don't support him for various reasons. I am thinking they might side more with our opinions, than the opinions of those who wanted to dismantle our current Govt. and create their own.

      Delete
    6. Billy filed a request for leave in his FB case today...don't have any particulars posted yet.

      Delete
    7. Think he may be a little late. It'd be just like him to start flooding that court with filings after his case is dismissed.

      Delete
    8. I agree with "too late"...well...perhaps. The order said "Windsor had ten days" and that was on Aug 20 . Do state courts (ie, CA) count federal holidays? Again, this order is in CA...Billy may have found a loophole in the land of...you know.

      Delete
    9. Windsor may be just in time:

      https://www.dailyjournal.com/cle.cfm?show=CLEDisplayArticle&qVersionID=332&eid=912892&evid=1

      Delete
    10. I thought the CA court told Windsor he had 10 to show he had leave, not apply for leave. He told the FB attorney that he got leave, but he wouldn't provide her with the proof. You know, his famous letter (not legit) sent to the Judge saying "hey, if I don't hear back-- I will assume you agree to grant me leave."

      Delete
    11. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT .Plaintiff William Windsor prove compliance with the permanent inunction entered against hien in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Case No 1 1 I - CV -19232 -TWT, by the Honorable Thomas W Thrash, attached as Exhibit A hereto (the " Permanent Injunction")
      IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT if Plaintiff fails to prove that he has complied with the Permanent Injunction within 10 days of the date of the Court' s order, his case shall be DISMISSED

      Delete
    12. No new case listed on PACER. Well, maybe the "I sent a letter" trick will work this time.

      Delete
    13. LOL that's funny. I highly doubt the Judge will find it funny though. That isn't compliance. That is Windsor being a dumbass trying to put one over on the court, which hasn't seemed to work thus far in any other courts.

      Delete
    14. In the beginning Windsor encountered the Thrash, and out of the oracular Piehole came a voice, and behold, the voice spaketh saying, "The Thrash was illegal and VOID..."

      Delete
    15. So...Billy filed 57 pages of "exhibits" yesterday in CA. Sure Billy...that will work.

      Dedicated to William M. Windsor (Sprinstein's "57 Channels and nothing on" ):

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5scpDev1qps

      Delete
    16. Oops... that's Bruce Springsteen (having a bad typing day).

      Delete
  24. Motion for a Mental Exam
    Motion for a Mental Examination of Plaintiff, William Windsor and Production of Existing Mental Examinations.
    2. Mr. Windsor thinks in 2011, President Obama , put Mr. Windsor on hit list for death
    3. Mr. Windsor thinks he is being stalked, when one of his victims read his slander about them on his many web pages.
    4. Mr. Windsor thinks he is smarter than most judges and lawyers , when out of the many of lawsuits, which Mr. Windsor has file almost all he has lost.
    5. Mr. Windsor forgot he is suing everyone in Mo.
    6. Mr. Windsor forgot this is the same lawsuit that was dismiss in Ga. March 2013
    7. Mr. Windsor thinks his wife left him because the Defendant showed the world the Sundance Movies rules , showing there is NO MOVIE it was all a lie.
    8. Mr. Windsor thinks posting that he has a 501 c 3 non profit then asking for money, when it is truly a lie, it is Slander for calling him out that he is stealing money from People that are hurting
    9. Mr. Windsor see nothing wrong with faking a child suicide, to build buzz and money for his fake movie then suing the mother of the child for not going alone with his lie
    10. Mr. Windsor thinks he lives, in a mail box service company
    11. Mr. Windsor thinks, I am America Mother Political party, when I pointed out he has crooks working with him and is dealing with known hate groups as per Sothern Poverty Law Center but the leaders of AMPP had film with him and gave him money.
    12. Mr. Windsor has a dismiss family violence case in GA. But he thinks his family hate him because of me
    13. Mr. Windsor in the Mo. Case there are emails that prove that he fake profile and email to frame another person, which Mr. Windsor is now suing
    14. Mr. Windsor thinks that he has a media empire and wrote a book called “Round America” which is also untrue
    15. Mr. Windsor cannot understand perjury is not facts in this case and many others cases.




    In the Event the Plaintiff, proves that he is sane and this lawsuit is not a product of mental health issues, then I ask that the courts to issues a “Writ of Mandamus” for the arrest of William Windsor for Perjury and Mr. Windsor and his co-conspirator (Barbara Windsor, Ryan Windsor and Janice Levinson) for running a internet scam about a movie. Janice Levinson knows, I am not part of America Mother Political Party, but she support Mr. Windsor using me to go after people, she has issues with and helping him con her own members to support him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What good is this motion if you're not going to attempt to serve him in your suit Kim?

      Delete
    2. motion is old ..... people ask for it so i put it here for them

      Delete
  25. LMAO - From NLA's site. Joe H. should have read the article before he got so excited.


    Joe H.

    NLA is in the national news!

    I haven't read it yet. Someone sent me the link. I bet it's about how we're getting closer to getting in the courthouses!!

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/03/sovereign-citizens-have-a-wacky-new-plot-to-take-over-the-government-their-own-grand-juries/

    ReplyDelete