Wednesday, July 31, 2013

"I'm Out Of Order? You're Out of Order!"



Weasel Curly (aka Attorney Matt O'Conner) strikes back.  A new motion has been filed for dismissal of the Windsor vs Overstreet case, and Bill dropped his pie.  Bill decides to go after Weasel Curly and directly call him a liar (isn't that REAL defamation?) while taking the chance to "educate Judge Rolf on the corruption that I experienced in federal court in Georgia".

Oh yes, that means its trash Thrash time for Windsor.  Bill claims that Thrash's ruling is voided (btw why is he even messing with any court anyway since he voided the Constitution, maybe it would help complete to picture for Judge Rolf it he knew Bill has also voided the Constitution).  Bill claims that the ruling should be voided because Thrash had no jurisdiction over his case when he named Thrash as a defendant to his case (when he saw that he wasn't going to like the outcome of the case), which was a cute little trick if we were all still in the 3rd grade.

Then Bill goes and steals Joey Dauben's tin foil hat and goes full nutter.  He claims that Thrash violated due process, committed unlawful acts, is part of a criminal racketeering enterprise, and perhaps most shocking of all....he doesn't have an updated oath of office.  Windsor said that Judge Thrash exhibited pervasive bias when he didn't recuse himself with Windsor's cute little kindergarten trick of adding Thrash as a defendant to Bill's case.

And if you thought he had gone too far already, Bill goes even farther.  He brings up the T word once again. Bill says Thrash committed treason in his case.  I wonder if Judge Rolf would like to know what Bill demands as the punishment for treason?  Bill says that "meaningful access to the courts is a Constitutional (its void though right?) right".  I wonder if Bill understands the difference in the words meaningful and meaningless?

In essence, this is Bill hitting the nuke button.  He knows he is going to lose, so its time to strike out at the authorities.  His cookie hunt has failed to produce that smoking gun of criminal conspiracy he was so sure must have taken place.  So now its time to go up the latter and blame the officials for "covering up" for those he wants to attack.  How long until Bill starts asking for a citizen grand jury to hear charges against Judge Rolf for treason?

62 comments:

  1. So let me get this straight.

    Bill (whom I believe on a professional level to be a narcissistic sociopath <<< OPINION not fact) states Thrash's order is VOID therefore it is?

    Talk about a disturbed man. His arrogance, ego and outright disrespect for any and all authority continues to astound me.

    Cripes Bill, wtf is wrong with you man? How can you not see how much you need a psychological intervention for your psychosis?

    His family washed their hands of this monster so the rest of society has to suffer the consequences of his psychotic wrath! smh

    ReplyDelete
  2. Intersting how bill has made conflicting affidaivits to the court one saying he never has said those things about judges and treason and then he files a motion with that same language. Isn't that purjury?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. at this point I think what would be interesting is if he actually filed a truthful motion that followed the same coherent thought processing throughout

      Delete
  3. Oh this is fun. Windsor made this point (in his response to the gag order, on hate allie .com)

    "Missouri employs the rule “that equity will not aid a party who comes into court with unclean hands.”

    Bill, your hands are the dirties pair of mitts to hit any courthouse anywhere. You are such a complete liar. Yes, I am going to quote one of the big ones here, that you SLID out of the PO hearing by lying to Judge F. (Yes, you lied because you said you didn't make the "New Years" gun post, which, you dumbass, you tagged yourself in GA)

    (Same article he says)

    1.DEFENDANT ALLIE LORAINE YAGER OVERSTREET (“OVERSTREET”) is a serial liar who, among other things, swore to Judge John Frerking that the PLAINTIFF had published repeatedly that he intended to be a mass murderer or serial killer and that she was one of the intended victims. This was all an outrageous lie and a crime. There was never any such thing published or communicated in any manner.

    In any manner? (revisit video below) Here is what Allie's police report said. NO WHERE did she make ANY of the claims he says she did.
    This is what she really said. (Pg 4 google docs link below)

    "He repeatedly bragged he had a gotten a gun, and was practicing with it" (TRUE)

    "he brags about his target practice then says he's on his way here" (TRUE)

    (Pg 5)

    "He posted today that his Georgia Judge told him to buy a gun and practice with it and that he is coming to Missouri to see "someone in particular" (TRUE)

    https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://allieoverstreet.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/13LF-CV00289-Overstreet-Report-to-Higginsville-Police-2013-03-15.pdf

    Video reminder of some of the evidence of said postings.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4yyqZzT1jA&feature=youtu.be

    BILL- YOU SUCK! LIAR!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. " How long until Bill starts asking for a citizen grand jury to hear charges against Judge Rolf for treason?"

    My guess, a few days after being given the boot by this court and any appellate courts. I would also guess, he's already begun a draft of his appeal(s).

    (LOVE this picture BTW)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Crystal clear that none of this has to do with anything that has been said or done to him, but about him abusing people so he can try his own case in court.

      Delete
  5. "The PLAINTIFF did forget to send the letter from the federal judge when he sent the VERIFIED COMPLAINT for filing.  The PLAINTIFF had set it aside, not knowing how it should be provided, since the Rules were clear about what was to be filed.  When the PLAINTIFF realized that he had failed to put it in the envelope that was sent to the Clerk of the Court, he sent it to the Clerk of the Court and served it on each party by mail.  OVERSTREET absolutely was sent a copy."

    Not sure the significance of this, as the Judge doesn't even read his blatherings, but I went through every last thing I've received and no, I did not receive the letter from the Federal Judge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the misspelling of my name as well as use of my maiden name that is not my legal name.....is getting old.

      Allie LorRaine Yager Overstreet was my FACEBOOK name. Yunno, so old school friends could find me via my maiden name. DOH! My legal name should appear on legal documents. But alas, we all know Mr. Windsor confuses the real world with the social media world, in my opinion only of course.

      Delete
    2. "The PLAINTIFF did forget to send the letter from the federal judge when he sent the VERIFIED COMPLAINT for filing. The PLAINTIFF had set it aside, not knowing how it should be provided."

      IMO, either you forget about something or you set it aside, you can't logically do both, that is, unless you live in Windsor World...

      Delete
    3. He cracks me up with his "but, but, but they didn't do blah blah, sanction them!" And then his "oops, my bad, I'm just a poor pro se litigant and you should excuse my breaking the rules".

      Delete
    4. Billy Windsor is Vickie Pollard.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zExc6SK4kpA

      Delete
  6. This is like an SNL skit - or a National Lampoon movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya, and the tickets for the front row seat is nearing ten grand and counting. Mr. Windsor likes to "win" even when he's not winning.

      Delete
    2. Pie Man Zombie HunterJuly 31, 2013 at 5:36 PM

      I do hope you get that money back plus some

      Delete
  7. "Based upon the incredible number of lies, outrageous discovery abuse, and uncertainty, no one can predict how long the deposition will take."

    And this is what it is about. It's about him demanding the ability to take over the court and force himself upon others for as long as he wants to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will be never ending. He is never satisfied with the answers. Ever. Because he thinks things that simply are not true. He is living in some crazy conspiracy world, and just makes shit up, and runs with it.

      Delete
    2. "He is never satisfied" Exactly. Just like addiction.

      Delete
  8. Refresher: Discovery, depositions, and then the war of paper. (remember these tactics, he's already trying them in the current case)

    "Windsor appears to have filed more than two dozen motions (and hundreds, if not thousands) of additional pages of material, including motions to "reopen" Maid of the Mist I, take discovery from the plaintiffs, recover sanctions, disqualify opposing counsel, and disqualify Judge Evans."

    "In the course of his collateral attack, Windsor served a deposition subpoena on Judge Evans. Maid of the Mist Corp. v. Alcatraz Media, LLC, 1 :09-CV-1543-WSD (N.D. Ga. filed June 10, 2009) ("Maid of the Mist II") was [opened] when Judge Evans moved to quash Windsor's deposition subpoena in Maid of the Mist I. In June 2009, this Court (Duffey, J.) stayed and then quashed that deposition subpoena [Maid of the Mist II 4 & 32]. Windsor responded by filing multiple motions in Maid of the Mist II (again totaling hundreds, if not thousands, of pages), including motions for disqualification of this Court [Duffey, J.], change of
    venue, and reconsideration."

    "Then, in July 2009, Windsor filed a 499-page complaint initiating this case and opening a third front in his collateral assault on the Consent Final Order in Maid of the Mist I. In this case, Windsor has sued the United States of America, Judge
    Evans, the plaintiffs in Maid of the Mist I, certain of their employees, and their attorneys. Again, Windsor filed a small avalanche of motions, totaling hundreds, if not thousands, of pages."


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's plant a forest to protest.

      Delete
  9. Montana - A man was arrested Tuesday night at local hotel for carrying a gun and wearing body armor.
    Police were called to the hotel someone noticed the vest and gun.
    When police arrived, they found the local resident already watching a movie--with the loaded weapon and carrying a fake Press Pass.
    The South Dakota man, Mister X, was inside the hotel with a 9mm gun. He had the weapon loaded with 34 rounds of ammunition and wore body armor.
    When federal agents arrived, they searched Mister X’s car and found an additional 111 rounds of ammunition.
    The man also showed agents a fake Press Pass identification card that he had been flashing—telling them he showed it to minimize any concern about his gun. He also told agents he had a concealed weapon permit and didn't want to leave his firearm unattended.


    Mister X has only been charged with possessing phony Press Pass identification. He has not been charged with any crimes related to the gun or the ammunition.
    The FBI declined to say whether or not they believed he intended to use the gun.


    Read more: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/fbi-man-had-armor-gun-at-theater-in-grand-blanc-township#ixzz2agMBJ1cy

    ReplyDelete
  10. Replies
    1. But so much like Windsor, you've just gotta check that it's a real news story. It is!

      Delete
    2. OMG Sean, that's incredibly creepy, it sounds just like Billy. Good find!

      Why did you change it to fake press pass?

      Delete
  11. "Judge Dennis Rolf granted my motion, and the Clerk of the Court is now issuing subpoenas for me to take depositions and obtain documents from non-parties in William M. Windsor v. Allie Overstreet and 1,000 John Does."

    Huh?? Ya right... He can kiss my ass, thats for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately its true. He dropped me so he could do it. :-(

      Delete
    2. So the Judge allowed billy to do discovery including depositions, It seemed fairly certain here that he would get tossed out of court, well now he has to serve the deposition notices and get a certified court reporter to transcribe them. He doesn't just get to make people answer his questions while he takes notes This will cost him a minimum of several thousand dollars 300 per depo Allie should offer a mutual settlement neither to ever speak the others name again

      Delete
    3. he would never go for it, this was never about money it was and is all about pure vindictiveness

      Delete
    4. I agree but he doesn't like to spend his money does he? rhetorical question. Depositions do not come cheap

      Delete
    5. I think people are watching with pop corn, from their computers, and not understanding how this works. And as usual, Billys facebook take on it was not exactly how it happened. Also, offering a settlement would come from the one doing the suing, not the defendent, and why would I essentially confess to a bunch of stuff I didn't do? Begging for some sort of settlement rather than a simple dismissal would indicate I am guilty of his claims. I am not, so the chance of me taking the hit to slow him down for, say, a week, ain't happening. It's way more 'think of the outcome in the long run' than that.

      Per usual, the articles he writes are not entirely truthful. There was no granting of depositions except mine. There was no granting of discovery on people except me. And people need to remember that EVERYONE even Billy is entitled to the discovery process in a lawsuit. The court can't break the law just because a plaintiff is a douchebag. The court hasn't even read any of his pleadings yet (mostly), nor heard a drop of evidence. We aren't there yet.

      Subpoenas to a pro se litigant are first requested, then given, blank, then filled out by the pro se litigant, then approved or objected to, then served on the person or entity, then a host of options open up for both sides to haggle over the contents. Bill was granted the permission to ASK for blank subpoenas and got two today. I just don't see what is so shocking about that. Any pro se litigant who sues somebody, would be granted proper discovery and subpoenas.

      None of that covers the truth, or covers the judges reaction when we actually get to the part where things are read, looked at, heard, and evidence is submitted.

      I don't know, I wasn't surprised at all today, and I didn't feel he got any victory, or anything that all plaintiffs don't get. I had asked for one thing this go around. It was granted as well. It's the way lawsuits work. File, discovery, evidence, ruling. We are in discovery. Judge is being fair. The truth is coming.

      On a lighter note, I now have paparazzi. I have to use side doors and avoid his stupid camera and when other people come around he hides the camera and scurries to the jeep.

      On a heavier note, I am not sure at any given moment if he will try to do something physically or if he has his gun on him. Sitting in a country courtroom with no searches or medal detector is very scary. Today I was set at ease a little because there was another event in the courtroom that had all my local cops, detectives, prosecutors, there. All visibly armed.

      Delete
    6. Yeah, the anon suggesting that both sides just settle and go home is without a doubt, the dumbest idea we have heard yet on here for hundreds of reasons.

      I'm disappointed that this was even allowed to go to discovery at all. This entire case is baseless, incompetently written and has missed several technical milestones. The Judge could have rightly dismissed it for...take his pick, being baseless, poorly written, or not following the rules. I think he should have.

      Delete
    7. Thank you as always for the update Allie. It is astound how much is able to abuse the system and your family simply because it is "isn't time" for certain steps. Pardon me, but the last time I read words like that in print were after the victims of domestic violence were killed. This goes public, there are gonna be an awful lot of questions about why this is prolonged. Hang in there.

      Delete
    8. You may disagree, but Anon suggesting settlement has a point. The plaintiff filed a complaint of injury and made a demand for damages. The respondent can make an offer of settlement, and often times will offer to settle if the case can be settled for less than the cost of attorney fees, depositions, aggravation, etc. It's not a matter of whether a complaint is baseless or "confessing to a bunch of stuff", it is usually a purely economic decision. And, in some cases no money is exchanged in settlement. There is simply a written, signed agreement that each party will quit doing what ever the other party views as injurious.

      But I agree that an out of court settlement doesn't appear applicable or likely to be considered in this case. Gingersnap hit that one on the head - this is all about vindictiveness and a whole other agenda. And as for the Judge giving Bill a lot of leeway, well, there goes all the arguments we've heard that pro se litigants are completely dismissed by judges.

      Delete
    9. When I was pro se, and I see the same thing here with Bill, I was given leeway. Not rule breaking or special treatment but leeway. There is a certain amount of empathy for someone 'going at it all alone'. Extra chances, extra time, etc, as much is allowed anyway.

      Interesting that if Mr. Windsor is denied anything in a court, the judge and court are corrupt and treasonous. If he is granted anything, even the basic things a lint ball from the dryer would be granted, the judge and the court are fair and just and the only honest court in the country. lol.

      BTW, I will not settle on things I did not do. That you can count on.

      Delete
    10. Even if you did settle, it wouldn't make him happy. He would crow for a time, and then he would want more.

      Delete
    11. The dumbest idea here ever lol that's saying something.

      Delete
  12. The more i read and watch this bill is the leader of his revolutionary party dubbed lawless america. Everything he does taking donations wining a lawsuit goes back to the political party and the agenda. Remarks overall are about him but also about the political party. I find it ailing that a political entity can be allowed to supress people views. So i am working at getting exposed the news media on a national level make it be known that his political party including himself are trying to take away your rights to have public thought and such. That is my take. I also wonder about anyone who has a gun,bat, stun gun, pepperspray, and boddy armor showing up at someones home. That is what i call a nutjob whacko inciting violence as if he is a one person army triuting i dare ya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah I think that is what is kinda going on here...Bill is trying to play both sides of the fence. On one said he declares himself a media outlet and can say whatever the hell he wants about anyone at anytime but no one is allowed to say one negative word about him.

      On one hand he wants to start a political party, run for office and gather people together to petition Congress for change while taking in donations. But on the other hand he wants no oversight whatsoever to that process. No one but him can decide where his "party" goes and what it does.

      Delete
  13. "As a Candiate for the U.S. Congress, Bill Windsor is beginning his campaign by driving to all 50 states to take the testimony of victims of judicial corruption and government corruption. This testimony will be presented to Congress. Bill Windsor's sole motivating factor in everything that he does is to expose corruption. He is a candidate for Congress because his candidacy will help expose the rampant corruption." -Bill Windsor April 5 2012 no mention of a movie here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thats because as he got out there no one cared about another vain attempt and running for Congress. The only way he could trick people in to paying attention to him was by telling them he was filming a movie.

      Delete
  14. Ginger he was a write in canidate along with per the list of write ins people put down were buzz lightyear and several others. I am certain he could have run with an off party but he just wanted to say he was a canidate heck for all thats worth me and you were a canidate. I know you know this but im just saying. Lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah the person we covered before Bill, Joey Dauben, did the same thing. He ran for something almost every two years (and lost). Its just what attention whores do...but he(bill) found that the fake movie business was more lucrative for him that the fake political career

      Delete
    2. I was a candident for president, I wrote my name on the ballot, and then picked myself

      Delete
    3. So you're not only a Lord but a President too? Awesome LB!

      Delete
  15. I remember writing down lb on my ballot too.

    ReplyDelete
  16. anyone have a screen shot for this... when bill bragged about practicing with his gun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think a few of us do. I'm too tired to look right now.

      Delete
  17. Why is it that bill is in South dakota?
    http://bit.ly/TLFz9w
    "So, we won't wait until we are in control to put these criminals on trial, we will start next year. We will coordinate the process of preparing charges and evidence against the corrupt government officials, and we will assemble citizen grand juries to hear the charges. We will try and, I expect, convict these crooks for a variety of crimes, and I anticipate that many will be charged with and convicted of treason. A group of people in the Dakotas have been doing this, and we will call on this group for guidance and help."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HA! OMG wow. Great find Sean, explains a lot.

      Delete
    2. In 2009 the South Dakota Patriots had a grand Jury for Obama. They found him Guilty of Treason. Guess what nothing after occured. But, Bill likes violent interventions with normal people.

      Delete
    3. Same article you posted, interesting wording...

      "Saturday, 27 October 2012 00:00 William M. Windsor
      Bill Windsor has taken the leadership role in a new American revolution..."
      "Now Bill Windsor is starting to share more of the details."

      Delete
    4. @ Sean, check your email.

      Delete
  18. In an off topic but talking about whackjobs here we have this article http://www.infowars.com/cps-kidnaps-drugs-and-sedates-our-children/ which I found posted on a parental Rights movement that was all filmed by bill. IDK if you believe this, then why believe the Mars Rover is really out there on mars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ninja if you don't believe me look at this https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.acf.hhs.gov%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fmain%2Fadopt_incentive_history.pdf
      This is a spread sheet of the adoption incentive program title but if you look at somethings like kentucky. The news article they use with the numbers is bad reporting like most slanted articles to prove a point. Case is no this money is not making anyone rich at all in the states. I have heard proponents against this ask for more and more subsidies to help them survive life, feed themselves. So while they are out entrenched in facebook drama they could be working. I find it hilarious then you wonder how CPS got involved in the first part. Its all questionable. When I was sent myself to a parents training session I was encircled by meth heads, and parents who were in some type of Domestic Violence dispute with people beating people up constantly. It was like the Montel Show. We need some morals and parents to teach the kids to respect folks and teach children about being better and learn how to be nice not idiots with each other and live on drugs hiding the real issues thinking that drugs will take it all away. IDK rant done.

      Delete
    2. Sean, I think I missed something. Why is this comment addressed to me?

      Delete
    3. Ah, never mind, don't answer that. It doesn't matter. Let's just let that topic go now.

      Delete
  19. My MySpace? Noooooooo, not MySpace!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was thinking the same exact thing Petunia. Lol. That's actually where he should set up his new page. ALL the Nobodies are on MySpace!

      Delete
  20. Why is it so quiet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. refresh the main paige...I think you are still stuck in July

      Delete