So after his day in court in Missouri and then spending a few days stalking Claudine in Kansas, Bill headed up to South Dakota to work on getting his drivers license with his fake residency (nothing about this man is not a scam). On the way up he stopped off at a place in Nebraska that has the worlds largest ball of twine. Bill is fascinated by this completely pointless attraction because it reminds him of all his endeavours, maybe its symbolic to him of how he ties of the legal system with layers and layers of worthless motions. The only problem for Bill is he lacks to focus and discipline it takes to accomplish anything, even something as frivolous as making the worlds largest ball of twine. He tries to make the analogy to his Lawless America movement, but forgets to mention that his ball of twine is completely entangled and there is nothing left to do with it but throw it away at this point.
After he attends to his fake documentation in South Dakota, its off to Missoula Montana for his long delayed showdown with Sean Boushie. Bill is ramping up his twitter feed with any and everything he can think of related to Sean, including 280 plus criminal charges he says Sean is guilty of and demands that the authorities arrest him, as a way of setting the stage. And who can blame him, how could any follower possibly keep track with all 1000 John Does who all seem to be the worst person in the world when Bill addresses them. So a quick refresher course is in order. Windsor wants to film people on the campus of the University of Montana and get them to say something bad about Boushie which he would then blast all over the internet in triumphant fashion. Will he actually do his patented drive-by stalking of Boushie's house? Will he even go? What happened to the charges in Kansas? All we ever get with Bill is endless questions but never an answer as Bill continues his terrorism in the heartland tour.
He has had a bad case of keyboard diarrhea the past couple of days.
ReplyDeleteMust be nerves.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis is bringing the argument from the previous thread over to here, but as to Barbara and Ryan...I'm not personally filing anything as none of them have defrauded me. But any and everyone who donated to Bill, who advertised that he was a non-profit, those people were defrauded as they were given false information to induce their donations. That is where Barbara and Ryan come in...their blood is all over the scam known as Lawless America. Ryan ran the website through his company while the money was funnelled through Barbara.
ReplyDeleteThis is why the Windsors did everything they could, including settling, in the case with MOM just to avoid those accounts from being opened up. There is a lot of blood in the water there, and all the Windsors know it. That is why my point was that if Bill files a lawsuit against someone claiming that they ended his marriage and cost him his connection to his family....Bill just opened up the whole can of worms for discovery and will throw his ex and son under the bus with him in one fell swoop.
Ginger - you're telegraphing your punches.
Deletenot mine
Delete"That is where Barbara and Ryan come in...their blood is all over the scam known as Lawless America. Ryan ran the website through his company while the money was funnelled through Barbara."
DeleteNo hosting company is responsible for content placed on a web site by someone else. If someone defrauds you over the phone, the telephone company is not liable is it?
Unless Barbara admits she knowingly participated in fraud, there is no way you could prove that she did. Depositing money for someone does not necessarily make you liable for whatever they did to obtain the money.
There is NO FRAUD unless someone comes forward and says they gave Willy a donation under false pretenses. What makes you think that a donation hinged on whether it was tax deductible? You have no proof that Willy has “blood” on his hands, much less any of his family.
IF a court compelled Babs to testify re. Willy’s claim that she divorced him because of the haters, her testimony would be limited to that very narrow topic. Her life does not become an open book such that she can be required to disclose her finances or her prior involvement with LA.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. She didn't know or she won't admit is a piss poor excuse. We still technically, someone, anyone, CAN donate to fuckface windsor. If and when that happens, no tax deduction which he has plastered everywhere it is.
DeleteProof comes by way of "discovery" not to mention all the other PROOF that fuckface and his family have blood on their hands. You apparently don't realize that a company cannot go around and take money, host websites through their BUSINESS name and claim they know nothing. This is just plain common sense then again look who's posting.
Susan I assume? You really have got to stop defending things you are so blinded to the truth of.
Delete"No hosting company is responsible for content placed on a web site by someone else"
Ryan allowed Bill access not only to his domain, but also to purchase .com's under his Alcatraz name. Not just hosting. Note, Bill is still admin of the Alcatraz tickets FB page. Ryan had the opportunity to stop his father from doing seemingly illegal or harassing activities under his company but he didn't. Rings similar to MoM, & Jorgenson case etc.
"Depositing money for someone does not necessarily make you liable for whatever they did to obtain the money"
Barbara signed the checks, and deposited them. Bill is on film stating that he wasn't around, and needed the checks to be easily cashed (or deposited) by her. If they were made out any other way, than to her, she would return them, and ask to be written to her. Now, why would she be collecting money from these people? Do you get checks sent to you out of the blue? Of course she knew where they were coming from, she was in contact with some of the people.
Also it wasn't "depositing money for someone, into some random account, it was her account. Bill stated that Lawless was nothing more than a website and the name of a movie. There weren't any accounts for "Lawless".
You are so fixated on the false belief that no one will question the income unless someone complains. Not true. You think none of the donors are going to claim the donations on their taxes? You are nuts. Cross references will nail him with the IRS. He is not in their data base. That is fraud.
When Bill sues the people (probably you too) for his claims he lost his family, wouldn't you ask the court to call her to verify that is why she left? He has to prove his case. He will have to call her himself. So, by demand of a Judge or Windsor, Babs and fam. will have to testify eventually.
"There is NO FRAUD unless someone comes forward and says they gave Willy a donation under false pretenses."
DeleteSMH. How little you know.
Little is right. Jerkoff windsor stated so much as the donations were tax deductible to his "non-profit".\
DeleteAre you new?! I mean really! He's opened the can of worms alright and I have simultaneously opened the can of whoop ass along with a few others :)
It's great when along comes snoozan with her usual rhetoric. While claiming to dislike windsor she vehemently defends him. WHY? It's almost like you're pissed off that someone might actually "get" windbag for something. Don't worry about us we have a really good handle on what we're going to "get" him for. There is a lot in store for a good many people. All I can and will say at the moment is just wait. :)
@Anon 6:40: You said "ignorance of the law is no excuse". You are wrong. You can't win a fraud claim without proving intent. I didn't say Babs was ignorant of the law, I said she can say she had no idea that Willy was falsely inducing people to donate.
DeleteTo the rest of the anons: You are all convinced you know the law the same way you were all convinced Willy posted a $50,000 bond in his case against Allie, the same way you were convinced his complaint wouldn't make it past a motion to dismiss, etc. It's hard to argue with people that pull their "facts" out of thin air so I won't try.
"While claiming to dislike windsor she vehemently defends him. WHY? It's almost like you're pissed off that someone might actually "get" windbag for something."
Can you understand the difference between defending a person and discussing the LAW? The fact that I hate Willy, does not affect my analysis of whether anyone has a viable claim against him. I tried to warn you (as did someone else on the previous page) that you are going in the wrong direction with babs and ryan. How do you translate that into an assumption that I am "pissed off" about anything, lol.
I've been seeing these "there is a lot in store" posts since January, lol. It's pretty hard to take you seriously at this point.
Susan, please refer to the Cause and Effect chapter in your 2nd grade text book. Until you can demonstrate a basic level of education, you have no reason to lecture anyone on the law.
DeleteOoooooooooooooo I can't take the suspense. Tell me? Please please please p,ease???? I could use some windssore bashing... I won't tell.... Promise...
Delete@Anon 8:33: The Law of Cause and Effect is the dominant principal of physics. But you think it's a LEGAL term??? OMG, that is too too funny. You must be one of the "very special" GENII!
Delete@Anon 8:44: I didn't ask you to divulge your plans. I'm just saying, the big, ominous, insinuation is a waste of font. At this point you have as much credibility as Willy when you make such statements.
Susan, your many posts show that you lack a quality education of any of kind, let alone in the law. Only you would misunderstand that. Have you suffered any recent head traumas?
DeleteOf course anon, you have the advantage of knowing who is writing each post, while I have no idea which one of the genii you might be, lol. Why are you so afraid to own your shit? It's easy for you to talk big when you don't have to own it isn't it?
DeleteYou first Susan.
DeleteWhat do you mean? Everyone knows which posts are mine because the GENII always tell them. So I am responsible for my posts...as Susan. I own what I say.
DeleteYou are posting as Anon and we DO NOT know which of the GENII you are. So how are you owning anything? I don't know if you've written the last ten anon posts or the last two.
Why are you afraid to take the credit for your very bold statements about the law?
Susan, you are the self proclaimed expert. So why don't you show us how it's done? Own your shit. Take credit for your comments and your reason for being here.
DeleteYou forgot to mention how you lost your case. Care to explain that?
DeleteNot ready to talk? Ok well let us know when you are.
DeleteYou could say we had a visitation. We are very worried about your health. Please try to limit your stress.
DeleteI like being anonymous so whatever, they/we are everywhere snoozan. No one told me it was you. You have a very telling syntax which comes easily for some folks. But more than anything that condescending tone just shines on through your shit.
DeleteHow many times it's been pointed out to you that every time you come here you admit this blog OWNS your ass. You just can't stay away. That's understandable since the topic is very up close and personal for many.
Perspective is something lost when your life revolves around the www. This blog became a "hater" of dumbass just merely reporting his bullshit with some hilarious commentary. So I get why you're here. I just don't understand why you stay.
~My name is~
Nunya
Somebody got butt hurt last night didn't they, lol? Anon's 9:51-10:53 were put well in their places. I guess they had to run to The Hopper to get those posts erased.
DeleteYou GENII even take the embarrassment when you are posting as anons!
Susan most people have a life, even the owner of this blog said it is a hobby.....really no one can be in this blog as many hours as you are.....
Delete@Susan, you are the one who is paranoid. You think all Anon's know each other, and can get your stupid posts removed by asking. I would think that the blog admin erases your posts, not because as YOU say, you owned them, but because you offer zero substance with your constant cramming of your opinions. Now, run along, to your party of one "Forum" you have been asked not to post here.
DeleteI think this is my favorite...
ReplyDelete"Will filmmaker Bill Windsor be murdered in Missoula Montana next week?"
OMG!!! What a f-ing drama queen....
at this point, its almost like he wants to stand on your front lawn screaming please shoot me, I'm right here.
DeleteWell.... ya know... Im not going to georgia, or Box elder or Dallas, or whatever bed bug infested motel six he at. He will be arrested for tresspassing, or being a peeping tom first, if hes stupid enough to try and throw one of his cameras at us... well ya know..
DeleteOn a side note... I checked my FB log in data. It says I was logged in from Atlanta on June 6th, .... Hmmmmm I think its time to change passwords....
Poof... craigslist add is gone... LOL Yep my fault, everything is my fault...
ReplyDeleteYou did get a screen capture of it, right?
Deletea printout.
DeleteI know for a fact it wasn't you (or you alone) I reported that shit of his as spam. Every where you turn windsor I'll be there.
DeleteThanks! We should form a new party. Citizens united to piss windsore off.
DeleteLet's just HAVE a party!
Deletehttp://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/spycatcher/201208/dangerous-cult-leaders
ReplyDeleteHoly crap. That sounds like it was written about Windsor!
DeleteOh my gawddd.... I just read this and had to pick my self up off the floor. I'm laughing so hard I'm crying. Roflol.
ReplyDeleteSean Boushie keeps filing objections to my CraigsList ads in Missoula Montana. I guess he must be scared you-know-what-less about now. Surely his days as a cyber terrorist are numbered.
Ya fatass, I'm weally weally scarrwed.
How does a completely insignificant little man draw attention to himself, for the sole purpose of self fame,& notoriety? Call for FREE PRESS!!
ReplyDelete"I will personally visit every major media outlet in Missoula."
"I am also holding a press conference, and I am inviting every media outlet in Montana as well as major national media."
How do we know he is an insignificant little man? Because no one knows who he is. But he thinks he is a well known producer/media or press person (and whatever else) and should be covered as such.
"If they aren’t doing stories about this, I want to know why.
So, what does an insignificant little man do, when his gripes seem, well, insignificant?
"Officials from the University of Montana, including the President, the head of the Biology Department, the Chief of University Police, and the members of the Board of Regents have all been asked to appear on camera to answer questions. If they fail to give me appointments for interviews, I will go to their places of business and homes, if needed. I will set up outside, just as other television news crews do.
Ah, that's right, if they don't do what you want, then you will harass and annoy them to no end. Even drive by their homes, if needed. Right. I say, it's a good idea that you are notifying every law enforcement agency imaginable to be at your little "briefing". They need to know what your intentions of being a public nuisance are.
"And then there is so-called “law enforcement.” I will be visiting the Missoula Montana Police Department, the Missoula County Montana Sheriff’s Department, the Stevensville Montana Police Department, the Ravalli County Montana Sheriff’s Department, the Missoula County Courthouse, the Ravalli County Courthouse, the Missoula County Attorney’s Office, the Ravalli County Attorney’s Office, the University of Montana Office of Public Safety, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. All of these law enforcement agencies are being invited to attend a briefing that I will conduct the day after I arrive.
(quotes from his LA . org page)
That's some seiously funny schnit huh? Ill try to post a video of him not showing up on Thursday.
DeleteRemind you of anyone?
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPGud5z_SHE
LMAO ^^^ @ video!
DeleteOkay tiny, nobody won lol. http://lawlessamerica.org/?p=156
ReplyDeletePieman is heading back to kansucks
But there is still nothing on Shawnee county dockets. I think pieboy is not telling the truth.
DeleteBill just posted his excuse for not showing up in Montana. He says he has to be in Kansas on the 25th for a hearing about Claudine.
ReplyDeleteBut did you notice bob he has not posted any documents for Claudine like he did with Allie? I think this is the excuse tiny discussed and nobody guessed it lol. I thought he would get distracted by Utah and ray boyett stuff.
DeleteThat's why I said excuse not reason. I've been involed in several court actions and I've never heard of a hearing being scheduled with only two days notice. I'm calling Billshit on this one. I think he's just buying more time.
DeleteI also consider myself an expert on certain types of filings. No way if he filed what last Thursday for a protection order in the am would he not have had an answer that day. Or even by the next day. Plus being filed last week it would be on the docket by now. He is soooooo not being honest lol. But what did we expect (read tiny rule number one lol)
DeleteIt was actually filed according to ie boy on Wednesday per his YouTube video. Six days? Nope I call bilshit on it too. As far as phleming saying that it is not on docket? Nope they put other things about her on docket, they would this one too. I call bilshit on that too. He did not file a dam thing. Probably isn't even in kansucks at the moment. He is a shark, circling, thinking that AMPP is weak after lundy attacks. Whatever. We are AMPP and we will always be strong, no matter what. When one is being kicked the others take up the slack. We were AMPP, before there was AMPP. Better than bill have tried to take us down and it won't happen. And so i am clear, when I say AMPP, I don't mean c or l or me or any specific mom. We are all with weaknesses. I mean AMPP as a whole, AMPP will always be for the moms, about the moms and with the moms. Even if it goes down it will still be there.
Delete@BL: Hearings get continued without ANY advance notice all the time.
DeleteGeeze Louise.... there isn't even anything on the court website docket and there would be no reason to not have it p, unless it just wasn't filed. Six days later? It would be on the docket. Even if there are no hearings, it would still be up. So BILSHIT!!!!
DeletePffffft at the anons who think they know it all. Why not call the county yourself and ask if protection order motions are placed on the public website docket your self you call everywhere else why not there?
DeleteI even make note since all of this has begun claudine has gone into hiding and has not taunted bill at all.
DeleteLOL, SF.
DeleteClaudine is not in hiding jackwad. Those who need to know where she is, know. Those who don't need to know can kiss off. Apparently you are one who does NOT need to know.
DeleteSome of us have lives to include jobs, hobbies and families.
DeleteI am using tinyfeet rule #2 here
DeleteDont forget rule #1... If hes breathing hes lying...
ReplyDeleteHe probably has a hearing someone had to go to the courthouse gor hom and get the info the cases are not public online only available l at the court. Then he was emailed by a third person the info. Its possible that claudine is beong surveiled by lawless supporters.
ReplyDeleteHe has not even disclosed the case number that is off though
ReplyDeleteWhere can I find a copy of the Windsor's Divorce papers, I'd like to know who got the 45 records, he had 10,000.
ReplyDeleteWindsor divorce papers - https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B_jWy9BohdTKVVhtclBYWFRUNHM&usp=sharing
DeleteNow he's got 10,000 22½s (now that Barb has half of his estate).
ReplyDeleteNah! It was target practice.
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wn8XFiAwLkM
Skeet those 45s!
DeleteI wish I had 10000 22s.... You can't find those things anywhere.. Everybody is still hoarding.
ReplyDeleteBW says: "I regularly have people stopping me now to say they’ve seen the Jeep before or know someone who has been filmed. Today it was a family on Main Street in Deadwood who saw the Jeep a week ago in Kansas."
ReplyDeleteYou better hope you sonofabitch that you don't run into the loved ones of someone that's filmed with you (or not). Or just run into the wrong person at the wrong time.
I call billshit on the whole thing. There's no hearing, he's never going to come to missoula because he's a wuss.
DeleteSF, rule #1 is everything bitler says is a lie. Rule #2 is: anything worth shooting o ce is worth shooting twice, or three, or four or five times. Keep it straight.
LMAO! One minute he says "Trial" the next he says "Hearing". Windsor SPIN! What buzz words will create the most drama. (IF the Judge did ask him to come back, it's because he has some "questions" for Windsor.
DeleteAnother funny point, is that now some "witness" wants to be on film for the Boyett case. Spin it Windsor! He hopes it gets some notice. He hopes anything will get him some notice. Every story is 'the best story' when he thinks he's losing his lemmings.
I'd say, he did that a few weeks ago when he insulted the dangling few, when he said if they aren't behind him in his stalking gig, to go away.
Oh and what about all the press releases he sent out? Hahaha he sounds like even more of a loon. Hey, come watch me film, no wait don't I won't be there, If you don't come watch me film, and you don't comment I will sit outside of your homes and work, no sorry, my bad, maybe another day.
DeleteJust like all his amendments to amend the amendments he amended. BAHAHAHAHAHA Just watch and laugh along!
(Love that all his stuff in on the court website!!)
Maybe he should get them to autograph the jeep to prove that they aren't just part of his delusions.
DeleteYawn. Nothing new here yawn
ReplyDelete