Wednesday, February 19, 2014

The Windsor Report


Remember that movie Minority Report where three psychics could see the future through precognition with such certainty that they could prevent crime before it happened?  Well Bill has added that power to his super vexatious abilities.  Yes he can sue you before you defame him, he just knows you will.

Bill Windsor 32 minutes ago · Edited
THE MAGNITUDE OF THE LIES AND DEFAMATION DONE AGAINST ME IS LITERALLY BEYOND COMPREHENSION so what is there to understand?.
WITH JOEYISALITTLEKID ALONE, APPROXIMATELY 8,000 PAGES OF STUFF what is stuff?, SINGLE-SPACED well why would you double space it?, 9-POINT TYPE.  yeah you are the master of specificity
The Joeys include many people who were filmed ummm name one? and proved to be dishonest your definition of proof doesn't jive with Websters'. You all know many of the names you mean random names you constantly throw out?. You may be surprised at a few that will soon be disclosed. don't tell me Santa Claus is next
I can't even hazard a guess how many libelous statements there are well you kinda have to in a court of law. I would guess tens of thousands not millions?. Each libelous, defamatory statement is a separate violation of the law. It could take the rest of my life just to cite them all what a fulfilling life you have here Bill.
These things you can't sue objects Bill, but I would leave it to you to try will not be able to prove that any of these libelous statements they made are true.
Let me state a few things for the record: the record is now on a facebook page?
I am not now and never have been a so-called "sovereign." you can't stand their monthly dues Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups. other than adopting all their ideology and trying to carry out most of it on my own, I have nothing to do with them
I am absolutely non-violent, and I have never proposed or supported any violence. Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups.  this is starting to sound like you know you are in trouble
I have never proposed that any American be put to death except public officials for treason. You believe what you choose preferably the truth, but I personally support abolishing the death penalty in all cases except treason well you just contradicted yourself, maybe we can see a Windsor vs Windsor case coming to a courthouse near you. I believe treason is as serious as it gets forget murder, potentially affecting every American. I believe the death penalty should remain for treason as a deterrent and lets let the cop killers run off. And if a jury finds a person has committed treason and decides the death penalty is proper, then I support that and who gets to define this treason of yours?. I am totally opposed to the death penalty in all other matters because the system is so hopelessly broken with dishonesty, corruption, and an apparently widespread convict-at-all-cost mentality that sounds like a lot of death penalties you have lined up then doesn't it?. Anyone making the claim to the FBI or anyone else that I have proposed killing all (or even one) elected official, appointed official, or government employee is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me. YOU JUST SAID THAT EXACT THING BILL.  You can't even make one sentence between lies anymore
I have never proposed "citizen grand juries" as the solution to our problems yeah, you proposed them without the "". I proposed the creation of "Special Regulatory Grand Juries" by state legislatures well this is news to all those Lawless Followers and all those talkshoe shows where you gave them step by step instructions to infiltrate local grand juries. This has been fully explained on www,lawlessamerica.com we can both agree on that. IF we can't get some honest people elected who will try to save America from the rampant corruption, then I proposed that we create some type of citizen review structure where we bring the corruption to light uh huh, case by case. Anyone claiming that my proposal is to create citizen grand juries of the type that have failed in the past is making a false accusation and is defaming me. ohhh here we go with the Bill semantics....yeah, you only propose the kind that won't fail, other than that its the same ole garden variety citizen grand jury.
I have never in my life scammed anyone where can I get a copy of Round America?, committed fraud what happened to the donated RV?, or conned anyone where can I see the movie Lawless America?. Anyone making such a statement is making a false accusation of crimes and is defaming me. or being deadly accurate with what you have been doing
I have never evaded taxes in my life you just don't file tax returns, at least not lately. All donations received by me for the movie what movie, videos what videos?, and Lawless America projects like pie eating contests? have been fully accounted for where is this?  Why not be transparent?. The movie trips and work have been financed approximately 75% by me wow, that's a lot more donations than I thought. Until I formed a 501 c 3 was it approved?, I never said any donation was tax-deductible yeah you said they might be, and I have proof galore of that. Once the 501 c 3 was formed, a very small number of donations were received (perhaps less than $2,000), and I don't know if those are deductible or not show me the money. Anyone telling the FBI, IRS, State of Delaware, or anyone that any money is unaccounted for, a receipt was not provided if requested, or that anything improper was done is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me. why not prove that?
Neither my ex-wife, my son, nor any family member has ever owned any part of Lawless America, my websites, or the movie uhhhhh, if you say so Mr. Bill. I used to use my son's hosting service uh huh, but when the threats got to be too great, he told me I had to leave he said dad has to go. I moved to Godaddy you took him literally several years ago -- before the movie trip and then to Bulkregister wait so the "threats" were that bad even before you started your fake movie tour?. My ex-wife was listed as the administrative contact for all web domains that I own yeah that would kinda imply she had something to do with it. That does not in any way indicate ownership but certainly points to it. I always owned them. I set them all up you did do lots of set ups, I'll give you that. I paid for them. Anyone making claims about involvement of my family and ex-wife is making false accusations for which there is and can never be any proof, is defaming me, and is wrongfully attempting to include people who are not involved just to cause trouble. sounds like you are pretty worried about Barb getting sworn in for court testimony
Anyone who claims I ever stalked anyone is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me so you just drove by Allie, Boushie, Brannon, and Hernandez's houses and post the pictures of them online by happenstance?. All I have ever done is expose criminals name one, and I will continue to do so with every ounce of energy that I have so you stalk and you will continue to stalk?. If you don't want to be in a video or movie, be honest and don't defame and cyberstalk me. If you do, I will expose stalk and harass you. I will come to your town to film, if possible. that's what we call stalking...Mr. bill
I will soon start posting the evidence to www.joeyisalittlekid.com. you are coming over here to stalk us now? It will chronicle all the legal filings and evidence in this case. I bet the court clerk loves seeing you come in Other evidence and legal filings may be seen at www.allieoverstreet.com , www.claudinedombrowski.com, www,seanboushie.com, those are three examples of cyber stalking www.lawlessamerica.com, and www.lawlessamerica.org.
We we?  all the voices in your head? now have a very good system for capturing all the online statements wow, most people had that 15 years ago. I have sued every person who has defamed me or will defame me what if the other two agatha's disagree?  Sue em as I have named "John Doe, Jane Doe, and Joey Doe" parties sounds like you really have them pinned down. I would be delighted to add you as long as the courts allow it he is now speaking to all humanity here, and if you defame me, I will sue you and expose you and even if you don't, consider yourself sued. That's not a threat; it's a promise and you have the vexatious badge to back that up. I want to make each and every one of the cyberstalkers famous but you don't have a movie though do you. I hope my cases will establish precedents that will serve as a deterrent to others hope isn't a plan.
I could type for the rest of my life, so I will stop. you should try sleeping sometime, maybe a nice walk in the park or a night out on the town, your obsession is consuming you
I pray that I have gotten lucky with honest judges and that I will get to present this outrage to jurors we don't have enough trees to survive that. These people have all but "killed" Lawless America good that was the goal, the movie so you admit there is no movie, and me you are still around aren't ya?, and we need a massive financial award and removal of all the defamation and stalking to have a chance to continue effectively. so no movie ever.....got it.

64 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What i want to know is if Bill says Barbara is not the owner of the Lawless America Association then why the heck is her name there as the Director when I received my copy of the charter.

      Delete
    2. You answered your own question. Director not owner. Potato......but he paints it as if she had nothing to do with it

      Delete
    3. Clearly Bill does not know anything about Non-Profits. They don’t have Owners but they are Boards of Directors. This is is not a defamatory statement but just based on his own comments and titles he has given out. He is truly not an LLC. I hope he also realizes sometime The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations
      Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.
      Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances. For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.
      On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.that 501c3’s can not participate in political anything.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great post, Gingersnap. The pic is great too - Bill hasn't looked that good in at least 2 years.

      Delete
    2. Excellent post Ginger.
      Oh my! The back pedaling? Olympic worthy, IMO.

      God bless 'Merica! (and every alphabet soup agency therein)

      Delete
  3. One of the best post ever!!! Sounds like he is taking the FBI investigation seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a great post. True to Windsor form, he is writing up his defenses to everything as if it's going to be his evidence.

      Windsor is SOL. See, the lemmings buy what he's selling, but the real people out here in the real world see if much differently. It doesn't matter how much he tries to cover his tracks, how much he keeps telling the Lemmings everyone in the world is out to get him or them, there are certain facts he can't dance around.

      He'll just have to deal with reality, which is something he would also sue if he could. Spin as you will Bill, it won't change reality.

      Delete
    2. thanks.....lol, he really would try and sue reality, if he could just figure out how to get it served

      Delete
    3. I have always said that it is Bill's own words littered around the internet that are the best evidence of his intentions and plans. The problem with the denial he posted is that it can be refuted, with Bill's own words. So who are we supposed to believe, Bill or Bill? And he has posted his stuff freely as he wandered the halls of the internet. It's in a lot of places, not all of them are Bill's own websites(although there are plenty of contradictions to his above statements on his own sites).

      The bigger problem is that Bill just can't allow anyone to disagree with him, anywhere, ever. I find it odd that he has reached his current age without having the coping skills needed to deal with not everyone liking or agreeing with him.

      Heck, he even wants to sue people who haven't done anything yet.

      Delete
  4. Last night I found this clip somebody posted on You Tube. I’m wondering if maybe it was edited or something. Because the words that appear to be coming from Bill’s mouth don’t reconcile well with some of what he wrote today.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX7fcVe2wy4

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL nope, not edited. However the Bill spin today is attempting some damage control. We've got him saying "Citizen grand juries" and "we take over positions in the government" and "We will retroactively validate all these actions we've taken" and that pesky "Treason" stuff among various other inconsistencies he's now spewing.

      Not once has he ever uttered "Special Regulatory Grand Juries." Why lie now?

      Delete
    2. Bill said: And if a jury finds a person has committed treason and decides the death penalty is proper, then I support that...

      GS said: and who gets to define this treason of yours?.

      See that's the problem. In that clip, Bill seems to be saying that starting in the summer, Citizens Grand Juries are going to try prosecuting and US attorneys. He said he "suspects" they will all be found guilty. Seems to me those trials would be a little more rigged than the system they are protesting.

      Delete
    3. oh my, that doesn't match up with his written statement. Wait, you mean Bill lied??? *feigns shock*

      LOL- you are so busted Bill, and there is more proof in your videos and your blogs and your words in your posts. Sorry, the internet is forever...you said it, now you need to own it.

      Delete
  5. So, did the FBI interfere with this week's posts of empty chairs? Who was "Court-Officer ordered" to appear yesterday?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did Bill make the FBI a party to the lawsuit? How is he going to prove that anyone said anything to the FBI to begin with?

      Delete
    2. I thought he tried to sue them once before too

      Delete
  6. At approximately 27:26 of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gCKvBM2v6M , Mr. Windsor expresses his plan to use, in his words, "citizen grand juries" to find allegedly corrupt government officials guilty of various crimes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also interesting about 24:30 he says he doesn't expect any changes in legislation from their DC trip because they are all corrupt. How about the fact that he didn't notify anyone they were coming until about a week or two before they left? Or the fact that he faxed and emailed the notifications? Is that how you set up meetings? Hell no, yet he continues to say they are all corrupt. Feeding the everything is a conspiracy lemmings still too blind to see he was using them to promote himself.

      That entire video is a joke. Looking back at what he promised, vs what actually took place...SMH. Lets not forget the DC video again from yesterday's posting ^^^ where Bill said his hopes with the "movie" would promote people to join the Revolutionary Party. (throw your penny on the table...) That is all he wanted to do with any of this, is gain more followers, and probably why he didn't vet any stories. He didn't care. He just wanted to grow his Revolutionary Party to "The" dominating party, get their people into offices, make retro active excuses I mean laws to protect why they did what they did through their citizen grand juries.

      Delete
    2. 26:00 Windsor says his most read, the most commented, the most liked article was the one where he proposed that he will bring criminal charges against ALL these "Corrupt Government Officials".

      Ok this is the same thing he says in DC, in this video here.
      "We're gonna hold these people accountable. Uh, we're gonna find them guilty. Uh, then we have to take control as a party in order to retro-actively validate the action that we had taken by these Citizen Grand Juries we put together around the country."

      Delete
    3. You Tube video at 30:30:

      “If you haven’t sent me the names, addresses, telephone numbers, e-mails of people who are, um, ah the bad guys in your story please send those. If you’ve sent them, send them again just to be safe. Uh, so that we have those and we do want to go out and, uh, ask these people, give them an opportunity to tell their side of the story. And, um, we need that contact information. We’ll be confronting as many people as we possibly can, both now and on a long term basis. Uh, I want people to be afraid of Lawless America. Not that we are going to hurt them, uh, physically because we won’t. Totally non-violent, non-threatening in that manner. We simply want to expose them, get them arrested, indicted, indicted arrested, imprisoned, convicted, disgraced, impeached or removed from office. Umm, we want them to be afraid of that happening. We want them to be afraid of being found guilty of felonies by Citizens Grand Juries that ultimately get validated once the Revolutionary Party becomes the controlling party. So, we need the information on who those bad guys are.”


      Olympic Back Peddling:

      “I have never proposed "citizen grand juries" as the solution to our problems”

      “IF we can't get some honest people elected who will try to save America from the rampant corruption, then I proposed that we create some type of citizen review structure where we bring the corruption to light”

      “Anyone who claims I ever stalked anyone is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me”

      Delete
    4. nothing hangs Bill more than his own words

      Delete
    5. "We’ll be confronting as many people as we possibly can, both now and on a long term basis. Uh, I want people to be afraid of Lawless America."

      "...get them arrested, indicted, indicted arrested, imprisoned, convicted..."

      "...we want them to be afraid of that happening..."


      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCJrd8J0UcY

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAhJMRKbZ7U

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eps-zBcUDao

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zuji1eyJ04k

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol-D_DcOSyA

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j6MKPmdtkI

      Delete
    6. Paper Terrorism Law & Legal Definition

      Paper terrorism refers to the use of false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other ungrounded legal documents to harass others, especially against government officials. It is the filing and sending of false documents to intimidate police, government officials and private citizens.

      Delete
  7. Huh...huh...huh...The Minority Report...on JoeyisalttleKID!

    ReplyDelete
  8. "When I set out on the Lawless America Movie Road Trip on June 14, 2012, I didn't have a peaceful revolution in mind"

    "So, we won't wait until we are in control to put these criminals on trial, we will start next year. We will coordinate the process of preparing charges and evidence against the corrupt government officials, and we will assemble citizen grand juries to hear the charges"

    "We plan to make room in our prisons for the tens of thousands who are convicted by releasing from prison all those who were wrongfully convicted."

    "My name is Bill Windsor. If you don’t know who I am, you should. I am leading a new American revolution, and we have formed a new political party – The Revolutionary Party. It is our goal to become the dominant party in America, formed from the 99% of us who currently have little or no power. "

    "It is my plan to convene citizen grand juries all across America to bring charges against dishonest and corrupt government officials. We will ask law enforcement to arrest those charged and convicted. If existing law enforcement personnel fail to do so, we will replace them and validate the grand jury actions retroactively once we gain control of the legislatures in our country."

    "I have taken a leadership role in the latest iteration of our ongoing civil rights movement in America. "


    all from this article:

    http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1202:plans-announced-to-bring-criminal-charges-against-every-corrupt-government-official-in-america&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Starting this summer, we will begin conducting sessions of citizen grand juries and courts in which we will put all the criminals on trial for their crimes, and when appropriate, treason. We will publicize this."

    http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1318:open-letter-to-every-member-of-the-us-congress-from-bill-windsor-of-lawless-america&catid=104:initiatives&Itemid=105

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "To prove that you are an Honest Government Official, please send a letter to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees urging them to immediately schedule public hearings into judicial branch corruption. If you have any question of the need, call me. Please send me a copy of your letter so I may add you to a list of Honest Government Officials. If I don’t receive a letter, you will go on the Dishonest Government Officials list."


      "1. We are asking you and every member of Congress to request public hearings on judicial and government corruption, in writing. I ask you to send me a copy of your letter to prove that you did so. Those who ask for hearings will be placed on a list of Honest Government Officials."

      Delete
  10. "But you know what they say: Never get in a fight with someone who has nothing to lose. All the dishonest and corrupt people should know that nothing will stop me in my efforts to get them all indicted, arrested, imprisoned, disgraced, impeached, and bankrupted..."

    "I bought the gun for protection. I am totally non-violent, but I will not hesitate to use the gun if I need to use it for protection."

    "I advise them to remember that you should never get in a fight with someone who has nothing to lose. I no longer have anything to lose. So, I will go after each and every one of the crooks and sickos with everything I've got. "

    http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1365:the-high-cost-of-fighting-injustice-and-trying-to-help-save-america-bill-windsor-has-lost-almost-everything&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I bought the gun for protection. I am totally non-violent, but I will not hesitate to use the gun if I need to use it for protection."

      Of all the many self-contradictory statements Windsor has made, this one's my favorite; I can't wait to hear him try to explain it to a jury.

      Excellent comments, Anon!

      Delete
  11. You people are NOT sane!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is that you, Butthurt Billy? You defame me! Citizen's Arrest! Citizen's Arrest!

      Delete
    2. Or, maybe its you who is NOT sane, instead of everyone else

      Delete
    3. Susan, what is your desperate need? What is it the drives you to return here day after day? What is it that forced you to become a complete slave to the comments of a few people you have deemed beneath you? For someone with a self proclaimed superior intellect, why lower yourself with idiots like us? I'd think a genius like yourself would have much more important things to do with your time. Maybe you should give law school another shot.

      Delete
    4. Waving 'sanely' at Anon!! ~ ~ ~

      Big ℗ waves to Sluggo, Ginger & Bob! Heck fire, waves to ALL!!
      I was listening to Brad Paisley crooning about checking for ticks this morning & it genuinely made me smile & think fondly of MaryD. Forever, that song will be hers.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    5. Cookout, if I'm not mistaken, I think it was Billy who didn't go to law school because he was too smart. Susan dropped out of beauty school because she couldn't cut the math, apparently.

      Delete
    6. That's rich! The Anon says we aren't sane because we copy and paste Windsor's own words. Hahahahahaha
      Sounds like someone who supports the World according to Windsor take over.

      Delete
    7. there is a reason Bill is 0 for life, and its not corrupt judges

      Delete
  12. http://youtu.be/WYryIL8l8qM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^ The YouTube link above is Marty's old Prehn family video. Schied just changed the name and uploaded it again. I assume this was done because when Marty has people search his name on YouTube, they find the incredible Team X video and watch it. The Team X video is still one of the best I've ever seen. That's why it has over 1400 views in 6 mths while Marty's had less than 400 in over two years. Don't give Marty's renamed same old crap any views.

      Delete
    2. Actually, the David Schied words before the video are interesting. He says that people should form their own citizen grand juries. It's all the same Windsor stuff. But no, they aren't all working towards the same goal now are they?

      Delete
  13. Bill must really hate that people can use google, and come up with his own words in video and print that contradict his version of the history he has created. I have always said that it is Bill's own writing and words that are his biggest problem. And he spreads them out to so many places, from Topix to blogs, from Youtube to Facebook, and yep there are those forums he posted at too.

    It's the thing that makes this whole lawsuit the most insane. No one needs to stalk Bill, he puts it all out there, from his addresses to his emails to his phone numbers, to his locations. And just because people don't agree with him, it's not defamation to say so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What? Critics aren't criminals? How utterly sane of you to say so.

      "If you do your own research, you'll see the situation and evidence is exactly as David Chase said about the Soprano's finale', 'it's all there.' "

      Windsor Unleashed, Episode 2

      Delete
    2. ... and what about the people who have NEVER put "it all out there" that this group has chosen to attack? Good Christian home school tea party members who chose to harm the income of a disabled person who lived through attempted murder and the rape of their three year old child? Does that make you feel superior? You are nothing but low life, red neck, Red Oak FREAKS with NO conscience and NO value to society. Karma will be coming, if not from Bill, from elsewhere.

      Delete
    3. I've actually talked to karma, both good and bad karma, and bad karma decided to bypass us, it's more focused on bill for right now.
      Good karma did however say it would stick around with us for a while

      Delete
    4. "and what about the people who have NEVER put "it all out there" that this group has chosen to attack?"

      I'm confused. If "it" was NEVER put out there, then how would any one posting here know who to "attack"? And is separating fact from fiction considered an attack?

      Delete
    5. first, anon 11:33 am, I don't live in Red Oak, after all I am a large body of water...

      Second, I have no idea who you are talking about, or who attacked them. You may have come to the wrong place, because honestly, Bill blames everything on so many people and lumps them all together magically as Joeys.

      Third and most important, your post makes no sense.

      "Good Christian home school tea party members who chose to harm the income of a disabled person who lived through attempted murder and the rape of their three year old child?" are you saying that some good Christian home school tea party members harm the income of a disabled person? Cos you are definitely in the wrong place if you think that description fits anyone here.

      And anyone who would attempt murder or rape a three year old is vile and should be in prison. Contact the authorities if you know details of a situation such as this involving a child. Immediately.

      And lastly, Bill has put it all out there, he is still doing so. In fact, he doesn't even care when he publishes information about people who are completely ignorant of either Bill Windsor or Lawless America.

      By the way, you should immediately confess to Bill that you have been here and beg for forgiveness.

      Delete
  14. oh the irony
    "what a fulfilling life you have here Bill." and all of you too. ROFLMAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So...with your ass fallen off, you freely admit to rolling around in sh*t?
      Sounds like you're living a fulfilling life too...albeit a dog's (bitch's) one.

      Delete
    2. By the way, if you were lucky enough to be on the list to receive via email a copy of Google's Response & Reply PDF, Mr. Windsor just lost his ass too, but not by laughing...Google just chewed it off.

      Delete
    3. I would love to have seen that. It was bound to happen. I guess he won't be adding them to the suit either.. LOL

      Delete
  15. Ah, he just doesn't want ya'll taking about the event on Monday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I meant next Monday...

      Delete
    2. The event this coming up Monday is not really worth talking about right now anyway

      Delete
    3. Is it Monday, yet?

      Delete
  16. I knew him in EnglandFebruary 23, 2014 at 10:01 PM

    I probably know Bill as well as all of you, and defiantly longer than any one here, without this back and forth, he's nothing. You cut this off, and he's talking to the wall. No followers, and the one's who still linger around...well...they have aluminum foil hats on. There is so much intelligence, cute graphics and comments on this board, why spend it on this guy.

    Just Asking........

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well originally it was because he was leading a nationwide effort, under the guise of a documentary movie, to overthrow our current government as we know it.

      But yeah, at this point there really isn't much left to be concerned with. He is taking out his vexatious vengeance on any and everyone who said meanie things about him, but the good news is he isn't currently signing up any new people to his "cause" as he mines the country from names, addresses and personal info. I do worry that at some point he will try and reboot Lawless America in to a new form and try it again.

      Delete
  17. Since Windsor told the lemmings to come over here and read this article, I thought I'd take the opportunity to say WAKE UP LEMMINGS!!

    No one stopped Windbag from making his "movie" but HIM. He could have finished it, but no, he is pretending everyone is out to get him. Fact is, he doesn't like people out here away from his little Facebook life, discussing what a liar he is. He will blame everyone for his failures. Why? Because all you lemmings are so focused on "Corruption" you have no clue what's really going on.

    Go ask Bill why he hasn't finished the movie. Go ask Bill why he is lying to you. Go ask Bill why he puts his own anger, vengeance, maliciousness ahead of all your issues? Why, because he lied. He hasn't done a damn thing to get anyone to change any laws. He didn't do anything to set up your DC events. Nope, you all believe every word he types. WHY? He hasn't done anything to earn that respect. Nope he is feeding you all full of conspiracy crap, so you don't ask questions.

    Hey, here's a thought, what about all the lemmings who did wake up and ask him questions. Where are they? I will tell you, on his hater's top million list. You people need to wake up. You were played, and he will continue to play you with every article he writes about his "haters" instead of following through with his promises. Nope, keep the blinders on...Bill doesn't like dissention in the ranks. He declared this was his Dictatorship, and anyone who doesn't agree with him gets put on a little list.

    (Not to mention his anti government treason crap, that he hid behind the "movie" which was all designed to bring more people into his Revolution party. Not for YOU)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We could never destroy Lawless America the Movie, because there was never and will never be such a thing. That's the whole point, it was an illusion, false pretense. What we helped expose was the illusion.

      Delete
  18. An SPLC Video http://youtu.be/d_y-gLm9Hrw

    ReplyDelete
  19. Get a grip. My name is not Meghan, Bob, Mike, Mary, or Nancy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I am not susan either.

      Delete
  20. Your're damn right i'm against The "Lawless America" "Revolutionary Party" campaign. If you can't handle that fact go complain to someone that cares. It is my constitutional right to speak out about against it and tell my opinion to people that I disagree with and don't agree with it. For It is part of the public discussion.

    ReplyDelete