Bill's Mock Jury Turns the Table on Him

All Bill has ever wanted was a chance to be heard by a jury.  Now he has, and he has been found not credible.  Yesterday's court room circus culminated in a rather quick jury decision of guilty on both counts.  Bill reportedly now has a PPO in place against Sean Boushie, he must pay Sean $2K, the court $1K and he must remove all references to Sean's name is his vast array of defamatory websites. He was credited with time already served so he will forgo the turkey loaf diet his body needed.  Bill of course will appeal.....after all he didn't have good representation and he couldn't even find his tie.  I guess lets first start with the opening statement he wanted to give the jury....before all those obnoxious legal objections (I know its long but we can get through it together, in fact I actually condensed it):

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, I am William Michael Windsor. I am a senior citizen they can see you are old. I have never committed a crime in my life other than automobile-related you stole a car?.  I do not even have a traffic ticket or parking ticket in the last 15 years thats not what you say in your memoirs. I don’t smoke, rarely drink socially in fact rarely do anything socially, don’t drink and drive but you do want all those DWI prisoners set free, have never struck anyone, have never killed an animal what about trees?, have never shot at anything but a target generally speaking, you usually shoot at your target, am absolutely non-violent unless you don't do what I ask, have never used drugs of any type well except prescription, adhere to all laws except driving a few miles an hour over the speed limit you have the right to remain silent, but I guess not the ability. I even make full stops at every stop sign I like long walks on the beach at sunset. I did not commit these so-called crimes that I am charged with, and it will be very easy for you to say NOT GUILTY actually its even easier to say GUILTY....one word.

Before I begin too late, you already did, I’d like you to know that I am not an attorney pause for courtroom shock and gasps. I could not afford one unless you count my multimillion dollar hush fund. I was offered a court-appointed public defender, but I did not accept one. If you aren’t aware of this, public defenders get their paychecks from the same place as the prosecuting attorney and the judge. I know I can trust myself.

You should always be able to remember I am not an attorney dont worry, they got it. Male attorneys wear ties and appropriate suits. I apologize to you that I am not wearing a tie, but the only tie I had with me when I was put in jail in Texas seems to have somehow disappeared during the 134 days that I have been behind bars thus far in three jails. I have more ties at home in Texas your court documents list South Dakota as your home?, but I haven’t been able to return home for 15 months. I guess there is no other conceivable way for you to attain a tie then 

Some people feel the man who represents himself has a fool for a client he does.  I feel that the man who represents himself will be the most honest person in the room outside the jury box well you sure killed that theory then huh; he will know the facts backwards and forwards; and he will do the best possible job he can.

I was a pre-law student in college you mean you took a class, and I was accepted to law school they let me use the bathroom one time, but I decided to get married instead. and obviously you can't do both at the same time  But for the last five years, I have studied the law. in the law library?  I’ve actually never been in a jury trial before, not as a juror, witness, or party.  Much of my “legal training” thank you for the "" comes from TV shows and movies. some might point out that isn't actually training at all  I have no doubt that I will make mistakes, but every word that I speak will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. others, however, will have quite a bit of doubt 

Please realize that the Prosecuting Attorney, Jennifer Clark, is not testifying they usually dont, and nothing, absolutely nothing, that she says is a fact in this trial. what if she calls you by your name?  This is very important for you to remember; she is simply presenting arguments. Thats it Bill, talk to them like they are in the 3rd grade They won’t be valid.  Don’t be confused in thinking she is giving you facts as she cannot.

I may appear to be extremely nervous but the truth is I'm just very nervous.  While I am a little nervous, I have developed a Parkinson’s-like tremor in both hands since a Wanted Poster was distributed nationwide for my arrest, I was unlawfully incarcerated for 134 days with my bail bond as high as $4.1 million, and I was facing five criminal charges that could have had me spending the rest of my life in prison. wait a minute now.....you swore in other courts that your claustrophobia caused by your incarceration is why you have the shakes 

Have you ever known someone with a Wanted Poster?  Well, you have now. they don't know you

I hope you are sitting there thinking “are you kidding me – they are charging this old man with crimes for sending an email to an attorney and for having a website!  And there is a Wanted Poster for him!”

If you are sitting there thinking, there must be more to this story, that would be very perceptive.  I think they are sitting there looking at their watches and wondering when you are going to get to anything closely related to a point 

This trial is an outrage.  I would say it is a joke, but it isn’t funny.  joke is on you

Many people have given me advice on how to present my defense.  As I drove to Missoula a few days ago, I had a lot of time to think you should have been paying attention to the road.  In the clear light of day the light of day isn't clear, I decided to tear up this watered-down version of my presentation to you. well why did you get water on it? I have always told the truth and I am the only one that can verify that, have not been afraid to expose dishonesty and corruption wherever I find it, and I see no reason to change now.

This trial is a horrible injustice. and an outrage? There is no basis for the charges. I believe the only reason the charges haven’t been dismissed is to try to give the Missoula County Attorney’s Office some protection for the malicious prosecution of this case.

I am a documentary film producer/director. I'm just one that hasn't actually produced anything The film is titled Lawless America. and a title is still really all I have

I filmed and worked on my movie and the pilot for a proposed television show from August 4, 2013 until August 23, 2013 in Missoula County Montana and Ravalli County Montana.

On August 21, 2013, to obtain a protective order, The UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE swore under penalty of perjury before a notary that he never emailed me. He wrote: “I have never emailed Mr. Windsor, contrary to his claims.” He sent approximately 88 emails to me.

On August 21, 2013, to obtain the EX-PARTE TOP, The UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE swore under penalty of perjury that I had a gun in Montana. He wrote “he claims to be carrying a firearm” you did claim that and that he was carrying a firearm “on person.” I did not take a gun to Montana in August 2013 or at any time, and I never said I claimed to be carrying a firearm you didn't "say" it but you posted it electronically on your fb page. The UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE knew this. He published statements online acknowledging this.

Please understand what a temporary order of protection is and how it is issued.back to talking down to them....good idea If someone gets mad at you, all they have to do is go online or come down here to the courthouse and obtain a set of forms. yeah its not really that easy They fill out the forms, hand them to the Clerk of the Court for filing, and go home. The Clerk gives them to a justice of the peace or a judge. In this case, a traffic court judge is the one who received the forms, looked at what the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE swore I did, and he signed the EX-PARTE TOP.

The judge never spoke to the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE or me. I didn’t even know it was happening. And virtually everything that the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE swore happened did not happen. I swear it

So, if someone who is mad at you does that and is willing to blatantly lie knowing courts rarely do anything to liars, then a temporary order of protection will be signed affecting your rights. A Missoula County Sheriff’s Deputy will knock on your door and serve you. And you have to abide by the order. It is really, really easy to get a temporary order of protection you have been trying for years now and haven't been able to do it…the more you lie, the easier it is. you have blown that theory sky high 

You’ve probably heard the expression “innocent until proven guilty.” you have probably heard the expression "are we there yet?" But with a temporary order of protection, you are guilty unless a miracle happens and you are able to prove that you didn’t do something that never happened.  or just use facts

It is absolutely outrageous that this is allowed to happen in America. And, it could happen to you. I’m living proof.  everyone's eyes roll at this point 

In my documentary what documentary?, Montana is identified as the most corrupt state in America. where can I view this movie? It’s your state, and I’m sorry that I have to be critical of it, but this place is off the charts corrupt. As you probably know, know, know know no? Missoula has been considered the Rape Capital of America and that has what to do with you?. The U.S. Department of Justice had to get involved to try to clean things up here. The Missoula County Attorney’s Office lets most of the alleged rapists go free. I have said their slogan is “Forget the Rapists; get the emailers.” actually you said tweeters but thats another story isn't it? They let University of Montana football players accused of raping innocent girls go free, but they filed five charges against me for things that are not crimes in an effort to deny me my most fundamental Constitutional rights.

You should know right up front we are way past up front that Judge James A. Haynes was hand-picked to be the judge in this case by whom? – brought in from Ravalli County because I believe he hates my guts not just your guts. Judge Haynes is a fact witness in this case, and he has no business serving as the judge you are telling that to the local citizens that elected him?. You will hear more about this later unless Judge Haynes denies me the ability to present my defense, which I fully expect so you dont have one?. When Jennifer Clark says “objection,” and Judge Haynes says “sustained,” I anticipate that this will usually be Judge Haynes denying me the ability to present my defense  or it could be that you are breaking the rules. I have named Judge Haynes as a corrupt judge along with every other judge who is a judge, and I have filed a 113-point Judicial Misconduct Complaint against him ohhh 113 points, that means you really got him. There will be more to add to the complaint when the trial is over.  at least 200 points 

One of the myths in our society is that we will have an impartial judge and a fair trial. This is a fairy tale. In my opinion, there has been little or nothing fair or impartial about Judge Haynes, and the proceedings in this case have been one violation after another. how many ways can you keep saying the same thing?

Judges all across America do whatever they want. They ignore the facts and the law, and they damage honest people. so says the lawless uneducated vigilante 

Deputy Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark looks like a real sweetheart  creepy old man alert. She may be. But in prosecuting this case against me, she has proven that she is dishonest and corrupt. or, that she does her job as the law states Please don’t let her pretty face and smile fool you dirty ole grandpa alert. I do believe that someone else has forced her to pursue this case. Deputy DA's usually do take orders from someone in their office...great work there bill But that gives her no excuse as she is supposed to abide by the Constitution and the law. When I met with Ms. Clark in late November, she told me that she hoped Judge Haynes would dismiss the charges against me.he did, remember?  He didn’t do what I believe the law required, so you must.

As to the charges, yes, I knew there was an Ex Parte Temporary Order of Protection issued against me. I will use the term EX-PARTE TOP in referring to it. Guilty

The EX-PARTE TOP says it expired on September 16, 2013. I know what the word temporary means, which is limited duration. please keep explaining to the jury your mastery of the definition of basic words

I believed the EX-PARTE TOP expired on September 16, 2013 because that is what the EX-PARTE TOP says.

Yes, some mail was sent to attorney Claudia Denker-Eccles.  At the time, I thought the EX-PARTE TOP had been expired for four months.  I also thought the EX-PARTE TOP would not, could not apply to something as vital as service of legal documents.  I was confident that I was not violating the EX-PARTE TOP and would not have sent anything if I knew doing so was a violation. It wasn’t a violation. Guilty 

It is true I did not release www.THENAME.co or THENAME.com.  There was no date on the order.  The law says that you can't be forced to give up property without a hearing.  I assumed the reason there was no date on the EX-PARTE TOP was that the court didn't intend for me to release it unless or until there was a hearing.  The UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE never ASKED me to release anything; there was never a hearing; and the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE withdrew his petition even though I hadn’t released the site.  Under those circumstances, I had no idea I was expected to release the site.  Guilty....ok can we go home now?

I didn’t intend to violate the EX-PARTE TOP. ohhh well then no harm no foul My actions did not violate it.  If I had deliberately ignored the EX-PARTE TOP, I would take responsibility for it.  but I wont  And I would have done hundreds of things that would have violated the order. actually....you did thousands 

But I did everything I could to abide by what the EX-PARTE TOP said, even after it expired, solely in an over-abundance of caution.  everything except abide by it 

This trial is a horrible injustice. There is no basis for the charges. creepy old man is repeating himself....bailiff....

When you came to the courthouse today, you had no idea that you would be making history, but you are. history is made everyday  Based upon my research from watching tv shows?, this is the first time in the history of the United States that anyone has been charged with a crime for sending a legally-required service copy of a court filing to an attorney. I haven't actually checked on that, but I'm sure I'm special, my mommy told me I was And it is the first time in history that anyone has been charged with a crime for not giving away personal property in total absence of due process of law. This trial is the final scene in my movie. The movie ends with your verdict: guilty or not guilty. its also the first scene and middle since there is no movie 

I have been producing and directing a documentary film called Lawless America. and I never repeat myself 

I was a magazine publisher for most of my career; began my media work in high school; why dont you tell us what you wanted to be when you grow up? have been a radio and TV announcer and radio news reporter; formerly hosted a weekly TV news show. so clearly this establishes some kind of credibility?   For the last several years, I have published online meaning I have a facebook page, and I have produced online radio and TV shows.  I have over 1,200 news videos active at www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. I worked for several months on a TV special about the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE and the University of Montana. I just don't usually produce anything 

In 2010, I had been married since college well for that matter you were married since college in 2001 too, with two grown children and two wonderful grandchildren, and had retired from a career as an entrepreneur and corporate CEO you forgot serial. I began to use the Internet to join with like-minded individuals in pursuit of my interest in exposing government, judicial, and law enforcement corruption. so you fond a bunch of lawless people I developed a website called Lawless America. naturally  In furtherance of these interests, I spent a year driving 50,000 miles across 49 states filming a documentary.  But in 2012, I learned that I and my work had been targeted for destruction. to make a long story short......ohhh never mind 

a lot more blah blah blah ending with:

If you are sitting there thinking at this point they are asleep, my goodness, there’s so much to remember, let me make it simple too late for that. If any of this – any single point – causes you to believe there is reasonable doubt as to whether I committed these alleged crimes, you simply vote NOT GUILTY. And if you think it is an outrage that the State of Montana would have me, a grandfather, put into jail for 134 days so far, strip-searched, sprayed with de-licing spray, exposed to Staph – MRSA – Tuberculosis – Herpes – and Lord only knows what all else, frisked hundreds of times, handcuffed hundreds of times, required to have chains around my waist with handcuffs securing my hands at my waist while shackles were around my ankles (that’s what happened to me every time I came into this courthouse while I was in jail here), held on $4.1 million bond, brought 2,000 miles from Texas and forced to live in jail or a nearby hotel for a year, and forced had to spend tens of thousands of dollars defending myself, then just say no. NOT GUILTY.  well that sounds like something that would happen to a guilty person

You owe no one any explanation of your vote. YOU have the legal right to vote according to your own conscience. Simply vote NOT GULTY.  or even more simply....vote Guilty