Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Comment Overflow

Don't got anything, but the comments are already to the "load more" phase on the last post....so you can overflow on here

181 comments:

  1. OBVIOUSLY needs to stfu http://oi54.tinypic.com/149o3v7.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LDXU5HO1hdI/TvxT6-rsvNI/AAAAAAAABKg/CbW2bf64Rao/s1600/blogphotostupidpeople.jpg

      http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/i-see-stupid-people.jpg

      http://www.funtasti.com/pdata/t/l-2041.png

      siggy

      Captain OBVIOUS

      Delete
    2. Susan quote
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1W7JGjbaXuo/TyGhqrCN0wI/AAAAAAAABCA/HiuKFIWfPLc/s1600/hitler_abortion.jpg

      Delete
    3. I'll give Willy one thing. He owns his shit. He doesn't post as an anon.

      I guess he has at least one quality that some people here lack. smh

      Delete
    4. some stick up for others on here

      http://stevekeating.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/warning-no-stupid-people_i-g-60-6056-ab9d100z.jpg

      Delete

    5. http://media-cache-ec3.pinterest.com/upload/257690409899113738_XcK127Fw_f.jpg

      Delete
    6. grand finale Capt Obvious

      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sAYx5k3R4H4/UK3m57FjHDI/AAAAAAAAOVI/yxsZXlpXnao/s640/Modern+education+creating+people+who+are+smart+enouth+to+accurately+repeat+what+they're+told+and+follow+orders+and+dumb+enough+to+think+this+makes+them+smarter+than+everyone+else.png

      Delete
    7. Yes indeed! There is nothing so powerful as a friend that will hide behind an anon and post a joke in support!

      She who doesn't "own her shit" couldn't possibly be posting as anon could she? LMAO Oh wait...that would be too OBVIOUS!

      Delete
    8. Oh no, I was wrong! The anon that posts repetitive text, is far more powerful than an anon that posts links I don't look at! This is like the ultimate DIS! The HORROR, the OBVIOUS HORROR!

      Delete

    9. Please continue to make your ASSumptions as much as you like. Ginger is aware of who the above was which was not me, but someone who was trying to stick up for me. They don't like you. There are others on here who dislike you and even find you more than a tad pretentious.

      Most tell me behind the scenes, they don't learn much of anything from you aka yesterdays news. While you continue to post your alleged expertise, it is always appears to be without any substance or "meat". No links, no reference to laws, no definitive specifics where one could truly be educated. But then again, I am not the first person to point this out on this blog regarding you. I've seen 3 others attempt to say the same.

      I'm sorry you're so upset with me when it was I who chose not to engage you. After you posted a yappy - pay attention to meeeeee - post 1 through 95 parts, I realized you have some deep seeded emotional and mental issues that have nothing to do with any anonymous person named yappy. So I felt the best thing I could do was walk away. As I will again. That is all. taa taa

      Delete
  2. I wanted to address an example of a story here in Detroit. http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/local-judge-removes-5-year-old-from-grandparents-to-live-with-mom-and-known-child-abuser

    Now I am not saying that the guy should go with the abuser but, here is the real issue here.

    1. They get a divorce the woman moves out of state and
    she leaves the kid with the father.
    2. She comes back for the kid.
    3. She does have the right to have the child it is still hers. there was a case about this already faught for in Michigan.
    4. So the mother gets the kid but she has a new husband who is an abuser. The mother is not up for
    termination of rights so they can not take her rights
    away and there was a custody battle in court though.
    5. So, this is not the first time I have seen that people who slap kids and leave marks on the face get
    kids. So, the question is if he indeed just left a mark on the kids face and he was convicted just as a
    judge I know did the same, does the court care about slapping? W
    6. What can be done?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Apparently someone who claims to be close to the situation is saying that the g parents are refusing to call, refused mother visits, and g father was abusive. One thing everyone must remember is that there are always three sides to every story (at least). His side, her side with fact somewhere between the two. I am sure g parents didn't let mom visit, mom is now paying them back and the child loses. Anyway I am done for tonight. I am tired and i am over my life. My child's father and the new bimbo professed their love for one other to our child on the phone tonight and he is getting married again. This is number five. I ws number three. This one is special. She knows he has been married four times already and she truly believes it is all the women's fault. Ummm yeah....okay.

    Repeat after me... Twilight zone...

    ReplyDelete
  4. PIE in: Someone goes on a rampage attacking Susan H., and you were concerned about my little comment? What a strange set of standards. PIE out.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Totally random but I stumbled on this post from the Dallas Observer http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2013/02/joey_dauben_associate_sues_goo.php
    Looks as though John Margetis was waiting for us to forget about his arrest and mugshot LOL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Makes one start to wonder if Margetis wants to be included in Lawless and with David Webb.

      Delete
    2. And my commentary on the whole situation. http://editorcurtisbutler.blogspot.com/2013/02/yes-john-margetis-is-truly-funny.html

      Delete
    3. Ginger brought this up during the Saturday night radio blog. She tossed the link up. From what was stated, google had the issue dismissed.

      It's MORE than a bit odd this Margis guy doesn't just simply come on here and ask. I've never seen him do that. Why not? You'd think that would be the first thing to do, not run to the courts. Very strange.

      Delete
    4. Curtis, there was a Margetis on the list to be filmed at one point. I am unsure if he made it though.

      Delete
    5. I dont think he did as this was during the time that Presley was filmed doing "I know Joey isn't gay, I am his girlfriend."
      Margetis was arrested before his film appearance. What I think was done was Margetis approached Windsor with the I can sue to identify Gingersnap if you come to Texas and film me. This of course being my opinion on that.

      Delete
  6. Curtis: I'm a bit confused as to why you are referencing me in your post as if being included with me would in some way connect someone to Lawless America or something else nefarious. I have no connection with Lawless America. Are you condemning me because I am outspokenly gay? The other night when you were blasted out of your mind on vodka I was kind to you when you were making ridiculous statements about considering suicide. What is your beef with me? I've been nice to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You've been nice to him? What about your redneck comments and your description of what it means to be a redneck in Webb's world??? And why is everything about you being gay???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Who the FUCK cares?

      Delete
    2. Until the next episode of "As the Oven Bakes," kiss kiss

      Delete
    3. Who is this idiot anyway?

      Delete
    4. Boggles the mind that anybody can take exception to anything posted here after reading anything posted or uttered in public by Joey Dauben, Bill Windsor and John Margetis. We have not accused anyone of murder, threatened to overthrow the government, posted personal information without permission, incited violence, accused anyone of molesting children, defamed public people with fictitious data or started rumors.

      Why is it that Joey, Bill and John and their supporters say anything they want without consequence, holler and defend their right to free speech under the 1st amendment but work so hard to deny our rights?

      Delete
    5. Wait a second guys. I do thank everyone for the defending of Curtis. Truly. Let me address the "Redneck" statement. I am one! I am of the salt of the earth. I have picked peas of all varieties, fished for my dinner on more than one occasion, and lived in the woods. If living off the land and having a lack of sophistication makes one a "Redneck" then allow me to bear the title as Petunia bears her tiara.
      Do I take life to sustain life? Yes I do. Do I return to the earth what I do not use for food? Yes I do. Do I take more than I can consume? NO!

      Delete
    6. I live an honest living. Dirty hands with a clean soul.

      Delete
  7. Bill Windsor has already made the same veiled threats you have made. That is my concern with you. Tracing IP's and such. that "others" are watching. Now with Margetis back in the fray it does make one wonder. Does it not?
    Even plastered out of my skull logic does not evade or elude me. Yes we do have a basic understanding of one another Mr. Webb I will give you that. I do not hold nor ever will hold your sexuality against you.
    While I may be a "redneck" and proud to be one! I do not think that ones sexuality is a defining trait of ones character.
    What I do find glaring is that, and others agree, that the wording chosen by Bill Windsor, John Margetis, and yourself is rather common. Holding the hand, so to speak, of Joey Dauben and reflective of his threats.
    While I find redundancy in statements made by yourself and John Margetis they are also the same made by Bill Windsor which in turn have been made by none other that Joey Dauben himself!
    Mr. Webb I know you read his "book" I know you took the criticisms on this blog hard as far as your personal work goes. But when the three closest people to Joey Dauben head strait forward yelling the same thing Joey did, well, it is hard to swallow at that point.
    You are right on one point sir we have indeed treated each other with common decency on this and other blogs. I am merely drawing a personal conclusion and opinion about what has been stated on this blog, and the current court case John Margetis has filed.
    As far as my statements about suicide goes you failed to read that in full. Do you just read the first sentence to a paragraph and assume from there? Yes I do indeed fight my personal demons Mr. Webb. Just as you do. Yes I fight to have a clear conscience just as you do.
    Again I am not bringing your sexuality into this. Merely your personal statements and the similarities of others that have been involved with Joey Dauben. That is all and that was what it it is about. Nothing more nothing less.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair enough, Curtis. But I'm not tracking anyone. All of that stuff about planting a "pie" was just a joke as relates to "cookies." I frankly am not computer savvy enough to track anyone. Ginger Snap appears to be the one doing all of the tracking of IP addresses. I frankly do not know how GS manages to do that on this blog. People do send me messages telling me that I've been mentioned, but I haven't asked them to do that. It just happens. And no matter how many times GS claims that I'm the one who complained to Wordpress and got the previous site shut down will not make it the truth. I didn't do it. Also, I didn't realize until reading your blog that Lawless America was citing the story I wrote about Margetis, which was prompted by the judge dismissing the temporary restraining order almost immediately after the suit being filed--not the filing of the suit. But whatever, at least I now understand why you were comparing me to Windsor and Margetis, although I don't share any of their objectives in regard to these disputes.

      Delete
    2. Webb, the only tracking on this blog was prompted by you. Ginger rarely looks at it except to see the general number and regional locations of people reading the blog. I suggested Ginger put the tracking on in December because I suspected you were posting anonymously. As it worked out, you were.

      Delete
    3. At any rate, I don't have that capability.

      Delete
    4. I understand that Mr. Webb. At any rate there are some things that you have said that have been thrown at many on this blog.
      I just found it hard to believe that Windsor and Margetis would just stumble upon this blog and use your wording. Again I was wrong in my assumptions and would like to say I am sorry.

      Delete
  8. Big baby is crying. Ya think for a guy who runs the Revolutionary Party and seeks a shot at being President one day could figure out how to use a cloud storage automatic back up services. They are extremely inexpensive and exceptionally efficient.

    For you to be this irresponsible with computers that have critical information for your 'movement', etc, made me laugh my head off this morning. Are you this dumb? Or is it just another day - another NEW LIE?!


    Lawless America
    4 hours ago
    AS JOHN DENVER SANG: SOME DAYS ARE DIAMONDS AND SOME DAYS ARE STONES. TODAY WAS A STONE.

    Life used to be so simple. Remember how great those times were?

    I was rolling along tonight getting a lot of work done, but my Outlook was giving me problems. So I looked online for solutions, and I skimmed an article about registry repair. I ran a program, and my hard drive crashed. Dell just told me it has to be replaced. This is always horrendous. All videos and photos are safe on external hard drives, but I lost at least two weeks of email, two weeks of file organization, and ALL of my legal files. No backup as I was in the process of moving from laptop back to desktop. I have lost some really important files, and I lost a lot of work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh and BIlly.... there are companies who can pull this vital important info of yours from your crashed harddrive. It may cost you around $800 but the information is retrievable. Since we know you don't stalk our blog, I guess my info falls on deaf ears/blind eyes.

      Delete
    2. Stayed tuned for the next episode of "As Today's Lie Turn"s~ (pffft, that probably wouldn't have happened IF.....)

      Delete
    3. Here's a more devious twist to this Petunia. What if the po po took his crybaby report and others also filed numerous police reports against Billy.

      Is he hiding his 'main' laptop that has crucial evidence of HIS stalking, threats and harassment to others? Oops, no officer, look at my FB. I posted on this day how my harddrive crashed, I don't have a computer you can confiscate.

      I find the timing veddy veddy stinky!

      Delete
    4. Yappy, boom. You are spot on.

      The flip side to that, is if all his 'legal' info is there, he might not be able to provide the 800 mgs (or whatever) of information to back his b.s. story up in court.

      Either way, it appears to be another sidestep out of his lies. The minions who were do giddy about 'getting the haters' won't ask questions. They will start their conspiracy theories now too about his missing info.
      SMH

      Delete
    5. Billy Boy, I WILL RECOVER YOU DATA FOR FREE! If you didn't intentionally low level format I can guarantee results.

      ^That should put an end to any of his excuses.

      HawaiiCorruption

      Delete
    6. Another (more and more obvious by the day) post that "conditions" his followers to explain away his lies. Poor Bill may not be able to produce all the evidence (lack there of) to the FBI now. Oh dear.

      It's a bad game of shooting pool. He sets himself up two shots in advance. (Lies, makes up some shit to get out of the lie just in case he's caught, moves on to the next lie).

      Delete
    7. You said yourself Allie Gate (cute name) a simple check of a computer would resolve who did what re: the hoax. Now his harddrive is conveniently dead immediately after his alleged criminal complaint?

      Naw, it doesn't appear at all like he's covering his tracks.

      Delete
    8. Wheeew, good thing I kept (and backed up) all his files, in case the real FBI ever ask.

      Delete
    9. He really should pay you for all you've done. Or at the very least hand over that volunteer award call to service from the President! I have a feeling you exceeded their qualifications by a few thousand hours helping Billy and his "charitable work". :)

      Delete
    10. Billy continues reminiscing on the 'good old days':

      Ah the 'good old days'...playing cowboys and Indians--for real, slavery and the sweet life on the plantation, women who kept quiet, barefoot and pregnant and in the kitchen, and gays who stayed in the closet...

      [NOTICE: The above is SATIRE and intended as humor only and not an actual quote]

      Delete
    11. Judge Snooty weighs in:

      Sharon Noonan Kramer "So sorry. That's awful. The emails should still be available from the net."

      ROFLMAO

      Delete
    12. LMAO @ Judge Snooty!

      Delete
  9. New Video!
    http://youtu.be/BoQhr36DFik

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's full of shit yappy, I'm sure this is just his excuse since his slave Allie left him. What a joke he is. What's his next excuse going to be? The dog ate my homework?

      John Denver also sang about leaving on a jet plane----do everyone a favor windbag and do it.

      Delete
    2. that's not your hard drive crashing asswipe, that's KARMA cashing a check on your ass. roflmao!

      Delete
    3. ROFLING SOOOO MUCH --- Can't breath. This is why we have the coolest clubhouse of them all!

      BAHAHAHA deuce deuce home girl! *fist bump*

      Now y'all gonna make him run right back to his protective order corporation of law n legal people that recognize who he is. (making fun of his 'choice of words for the Police Station).

      Delete
    4. yaps da bling bling gangstaFebruary 27, 2013 at 6:27 AM

      LOL uhh ROO.. Denver also crashed his plane and died (accident of course). :O Just sayin' hehe

      Delete
    5. G-Snap 4 Life Yo! ***FIST BUMP***

      DEUCES!

      Yeah, I know he's gonna get his man boobs twisted but whatever, last time I checked the 1st Amendment applied to ALL citizens not just a fat fuck in Georgia.

      Delete
    6. Ain't Nothing but a Roo Thang BabyFebruary 27, 2013 at 6:35 AM

      Denver also crashed his plane and died

      EXACTLY

      Delete
    7. LOL great video. It's bangin' Roo!!

      Throw back's a bitch yo!

      His own words,
      he hates coming back,
      but tough shit you pie turd,
      Karma's right on track.

      Delete
    8. BRILLIANT! I think Billy's jealous of your technical skill.

      Delete
    9. @Roo, Nice job!

      G-Snap Gangsta 4 life! Holla!

      I must say I'm looking mighty handsome with those 2 Tommy-Guns and Yappy is looking sharp with her bling! Thanks.

      Delete
    10. HOLLA!! I though y'all looked pretty sharp :D

      Thank you all---I probably could edit and really make a real movie with as much time as the ol' coot has had. He probably is so jelly. ;)

      Delete
    11. BTW Roo I heard through the grapevine that you needed to talk to me. spawnchild517@gmail.com

      Delete
    12. sent you email did you get?

      Delete
  10. Lawless America
    8 hours ago
    AS JOHN DENVER SANG: SOME DAYS ARE DIAMONDS AND SOME DAYS ARE STONES. TODAY WAS A STONE.

    Life used to be so simple. Remember how great those times were?

    I was rolling along tonight getting a lot of work done, but my Outlook was giving me problems. So I looked online for solutions, and I skimmed an article about registry repair. I ran a program, and my hard drive crashed. Dell just told me it has to be replaced. This is always horrendous. All videos and photos are safe on external hard drives, but I lost at least two weeks of email, two weeks of file organization, and ALL of my legal files. No backup as I was in the process of moving from laptop back to desktop. I have lost some really important files, and I lost a lot of work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Huh...the man can't keep a hard drive running. Here's a tip Billy, STOP SITTING ON THEM!

      (Seriously, back in June, 2012, just before he went on his filming-for-pie road trip, he said he had a drive crash.
      So, if it's the same system, the HD didn't last eight months,
      and that's really strange.)

      Delete
    2. That's RIGHT!! I remember that back in the day---when everyone (connie & pres) were SOOooooo totally excited that help was on the way!

      Delete
  11. Hey! Sucks I haven't been back. I've just been reading. Anybody who wants to see me can watch Smash on Monday! I'm back!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pie Man Zombie HunterFebruary 27, 2013 at 10:57 AM

    http://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1?ref=ts&fref=ts#!/permalink.php?story_fbid=145941302234095&id=144531579041734

    If you want to waste your time and money fighting against, opinion, truth and becoming the butt of jokes as a result of your conduct as a public (or limited public figure) you will not win.

    I would strongly advise you to cease and desist and stay far out of my way.

    Albert J. Fiorini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awesome letter Albert.

      So, do we know why he wrote this amazing tidbit to the Pie Man?

      Delete
    2. He didn't like the Allie execution and spot out his pie on that one.

      Delete
    3. Pie Man Zombie HunterFebruary 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM

      did you notice his number are down over a 1000 people today?

      Delete
    4. I went to his page, and I am reading the comments from his Sunday posting where he says he joins David, Allie and Mark.

      These are great comments but DAYMN, that Sharon is a fricken block head. Clueless and dangerous. If what she deems evidence of this scam to support the pie man, she isn't a very good vetter or activist at all.

      Delete
    5. Ok, so I am slow today. That was the thread for all of Allie's comments to Sharon that were posted here. Sorry

      Anyway, GO ALBERT!!



      Delete
    6. I have his database. Ya, the one he says he will sue me for having. No, I am not using it for anything Bill, unravel your panties. I'm just making reference that the real followers are under 300.

      Delete
    7. Pie Man Zombie HunterFebruary 27, 2013 at 12:06 PM

      Allie can you give it to the police, so they can Help all the people he con and lie to, so some of his victims, can get some justice

      Delete
    8. @ Allie,
      How do you feel now that he did what he did to you???? Did yo really think you exempt from that happening to you? You saw how DIRTY, SCANDALOUS and SHADY he was to EVERYONE else. He posted about all his THOUSANDS of followers and all his other BULLSHIT and you just went ALONG with it. You knew how deceitful he was. Just thought I'd ask

      Delete
    9. You know, sometimes good people get conned into not seeing things clearly. It's not about attacking right now, it's about supporting those who have been conned, learned, and can bring more evidence to light about this sick game he is playing with desperate people's lives.

      Delete
    10. Yes, Ninja!
      The inner fussing & discussing can proceed AFTER the common denominator is removed.

      20/20 in the rearview everytime~

      Delete
    11. I am not attacking, I am just wondering as she was HIS RIGHT HAND WOMAN and knew what was going on. I am just a little confused about that

      Delete
    12. How does a person post as "anon" while chastising someone else for taking part in something devious? The double standard used here is really fascinating.

      Citizens Arrayst, Citizens Arrayst, we have an integrity violation here!

      Delete
    13. It's ok. I will answer. I was with him for a year. The first several months, I was just like the rest. I followed him on facebook. I liked what he said. The difference was in that I spent more time than most on it and I really devoted myself to doing rather than just watching. That kudos goes to my daughter, because I promised her I'd spend the rest of my life fixing what **cked up her life.

      The problem began because I'm not a professional activist or advocate. I was going to do something, but what exactly that was, I didn't know. So I latched onto LA and ran with it.

      For the record, there were a lot of pieces to LA I didn't personally agree with but I overlooked them because I believed in Bill and in the big picture of holding courts accountable. All the jury trials and treason charges were always too far out there for me.

      When he started hating the haters, he'd copy me on all emails and message me a lot. I got only his side, coupled with emails of people cursing him. I didn't like his public listings but I didnt at that time see it as all his fault. I mentioned it often to him but he never answered.

      It wasn't until a few weeks before DC that I caught him in outright lies. Partly because I wasn't looking for it before. I asked him about the lies and he ignored me. In hindsight, he thought I was onboard with him even on the scamming because he thought I'd been reading all the emails and didn't oppose. Really, I didn't read all the emails. There were thousands. I didn't open many of them. Figured they were just more copies of his emails to people. They were, but when I did open and read, I was mortified. So at DC we played partners and it wasn't all fake but there deff were issues brewing. I confronted him a few days after DC and he has made the rest public so you know already.

      I can't say anything that sounds schmoozy. All I can say is when I saw it, I confronted it. The fact that it was months later, I can't help. The listings before, I did not like the WAY he did it but at the time I didn't have an issue with the fact they happened because all I saw was what he showed me. So, I would tell him to stop putting them publicly but I still supported him.

      Delete
    14. Susan, there is more than one person that has chosen to post anonymously here. You can't lump them all together. Yes, I'd prefer they pick screennames. I don't care if they use their name. But, this anon was probably hurt by Bill & wants to know how Allie could see what she saw and not do something. Personally, I don't think Allie was around Bill all that much , and it takes a little time to put the pieces together. And with Bill, I'm sure she was a little hesitant on how she was going to plan her departure also. I doubt she wanted to be the next person attacked.


      BUUUUUT, I don't see why this anon posing that question makes it a double standard. Nor do I think they are chastising her of "taking part in something devious." I don't see those allegations AT ALL. And, I don't think that simply being anonymous means that they are devious.

      Delete
    15. Did anybody get a screen shot of Al's letter? The page is down.

      Delete
    16. @ Allie, thanks for your clarification. I have a better understanding now of your situation. As far as Susan Harbison, you can take your comment and shove it up your ass. Your my comment directed towards YOU? Did it have YOUR name in it? NO it didn't

      Delete
    17. * Was my comment directed towards YOU?*

      Delete
    18. Thank you Oreader!!!!!

      Delete
    19. Susan have you taken your medications' today?????

      Delete
    20. No prob, I didn't read you as being hostile or devious. I read it as hurt and questioning - two emotions I think are very understandable.

      And Allie, I too appreciate your candor. Bill is the monster, not you.

      Delete
    21. @Oreader: Of course all anons are lumped together. They haven't asked to be considered as individuals and they have made it impossible for us to do so. Your mileage may vary on that issue, but this is my own policy.

      If you look at Anon 2:26, I think you will agree that anon 12:50 is a regular here. I think when someone escapes to the use of anon, while using a regular screen name here, she is aptly described as devious. And this is OBVIOUSLY an accepted, heavily employed practice here on this blog that regularly calls out others for lacking integrity.

      If you didn't think anon 12:50 was chastising Allie for lacking integrity, you and I have very different interpretations of the word chastise.



      Delete
    22. @Anon 2:25, Bravo.

      @Allie, Bravo to you as well for helping us understand where you are coming from.

      Delete
    23. Although this should be OBVIOUS, here is the part I read as chastising Ali for her association with a known liar:

      Anon 12:50 wrote: "you just went ALONG with it. You knew how deceitful he was."

      Delete
    24. Susan, that conversation was between Anon and Allie. Anon asked Allie to explain, Allie did. Whether you read any part of that question as "chastising" doesn't matter. I believe you have been told, many times at this point, that no one cares how you read things or what you think. Now STFU.

      Delete
    25. Susan, yes, it was obvious what you thought was chastising. However, as I made clear, I don't think that person was accusing Allie of Bill's actions. I read "went along" as meaning "visibly maintained support of Bill." Again, I read it as, "I was hurt by Bill. You knew he was hurting people. Why didn't you stand up for me?" I think that is a valid question. Was it stated in a confrontational manner? Sure. Do you not get a little confrontational when you are hurt? Allie did a good job of responding and the anon thanked her.

      As you may know, I set up some of the technical stuff behind the scenes of this blog. So, I get the added bonus of being able to follow the anons a little better. If I see a few posts from Fargo, ND, eventually, I kind of get a feel for that person. I may not know who they are, but I can kind of see their thought processes. So, in the case of this anon, the person who posted at 2:26 & 12:50 are indeed the SAME PERSON (as I would have thought was obvious by their response to Allie). As for your assumption that they are a regular poster hiding under the title of anonymous. No, they are not. This is not somebody that you know on the blog by a screenname. This is somebody that I've seen post from time to time, usually with a link to something on the Lawless site that is worthy of discussion or a simple opinion about whatever we are talking about. This person posts fairly infrequently, and they do not engage people in fights or arguments. Like I said, sure I read that the person was upset with Allie, but I didn't read it in the manner that you did. I think you are flat out wrong. And yes, I don't agree with you on your assessment that all the anonymous posters should be treated as a single entity. I did say I'd prefer everybody pick a screenname because it would be easier. Do I care if they use a legal name, certainly not. The name Susan Harbison holds no more weight to me than does the name Gingersnap. I don't know either of you, so how do I know that is your real name either? All I care about is opinions and discussion.

      Delete
    26. Sorry anon for outting you a bit, but all I can see is a city and a state.You haven't ever attacked anybody on this blog, and I think it's important that Susan knows that before she makes more assumptions.

      Delete
    27. No problem OReader :) Why doesn't SUSAN get the hint AND GET LOST!!!!

      Delete
    28. @Anon,
      Well one would think that "hint" has been OBVIOUS but apparently not so much...

      Delete
    29. OH Fargo that's me eh. Sorry about that but ya, I think that Susan you're wrapped a little too tight about anon's.
      I think that's the second time you've called out an anon eh? But ya eh, I do think you need to quit adding your little snot to worrying about who's who here hun, don't ya know? So ya really stfu and worry about your own rumpus eh? You're a smooth smoothie, you know?

      Delete
    30. If Susan is implying in the least I was the anon (12:50 / 2:26), Oreader and Ginger can easily clarify that via the IP and confirm it is not me. Never mind the fact I am at the schools picking up my babes during that time. Keep trying Susan. You wonder why people tell you to STFU? Tell you to shove it up your ass? Regarding asking her if she's taken her meds today? I think Susan's problems are way beyond a little pill.

      I DITTO Spawn & anons alike :)

      Delete
    31. I see Oreader cleared up the matter while I was writing. Thank you Oreader as I am certain Ms Can't Stand Being wrong truly thought it was "yappy" posting as the anon. smh

      Delete
    32. Susan is INCREDIBLY obsessed with anons. As per my earlier suspicion of her incredulous need to categorize all of the anons I believe is for the benefit of Billy. It looks like others are getting very concerned about her 'devious' yet OBVIOUS issues with anons.

      Delete
    33. Hey Margie, come on over I'll fix you some eggs.

      Delete
    34. @Oreader: I couldn't careless who any anon is. I do however have a problem with people that do not choose to own their shit. And when someone that refuses to own her shit makes judgmental statements about someone that DOES own her shit, I am compelled to point out the OBVIOUS double standard. When I am confrontational, for any reason, I don't question someone's integrity as I display a lack of such myself.

      We will have to agree to disagree on the content of the anon's post as well as on the integrity of posting as an anon.

      I'm not interested in what you can see behind the scenes. I'm only interested in what the person does publicly.

      I've stated several times that Susan Harbison is a screen name.

      "All I care about is opinions and discussion." We are in agreement there. But as I said, when the opinion questions someone's integrity, from behind an anon, I think that opinion is subject to question.

      @Marge: I don't know or care who you are. All I'm saying is that if you are going to hide behind an anon, you have no business questioning someone else's integrity. And that "smooth smoothie" comment was devastating to me. Way to go for the jugular! LMAO

      Delete
    35. anon says STFU SusanFebruary 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM

      STFU STFU

      Delete
    36. But you (anonymously under a screen name) are not questioning the integrity of the other anons? 'Cause it seems like you are . . . a teeensie weeeensie wittle bit.

      Delete
    37. I do question the integrity of anyone that uses anon without doing something to distinguish her post from other anons. It's a failure to own one's shit. I don't think a person of good character makes hit and run posts.

      YMMV.

      Delete
    38. If it matters in the least?
      I can see/understand & empathize with the explanation that Allie O gave to Anon (&us).
      Allie O owned her shit & now? She's doing, IMHO, what she can to amend & apologize. To me, hiding behind an Alpaca named Petunia? I think that takes a big (girl) person.

      Susan, you may not mean to, but....you come off as snotty.

      Delete
    39. @Petunia: Have you noticed the tone of many of the posts directed at me? I treat everyone with respect when I first encounter them. If they do not return that courtesy, I treat them in kind. I didn't cast the first stone here, but I have a large arsenal and I don't mind returning fire.

      I try to direct my snarky posts to those that have invited them.

      I do write in a very matter of fact manner here. It is not intended to be snotty but if people want to read into the posts of someone they don't know, that's their problem.

      Finally, I do have a problem with hypocrisy. If I see someone doing something while criticizing others for the same behavior, I sometimes call them on it. And I just plain dislike people that won't own their shit. I've seen a lot of both problems from some of the regulars here.

      Delete
    40. @spawn "OH ya?"

      Delete
  13. OK, Show of (tiny)hands.. Who got their restraining orders from the pie tard today. Come on, who had the po po show up... Today should have been the day they started showing up.

    Come on, admit it,... nobody, really... wow Im surprised...

    I still have this song stuck in my head, how do I get it out??
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VD3pBTK0oA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll reply even though my hands aren't very tiny. I've been terrified, waiting, sitting, pacing with so much fear I'm even jumpy when the phone rings or the dog barks.

      So I'll see your song stuck in your head and raise you a little prayer to help protect us from the scary pie lying psycho monster.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDK9QqIzhwk

      Delete
    2. Oh Yah! Brings back fond memories of "The Big Bang" episode when Amy Farah Fowler played it on her harp for Sheldon!

      Good Times!

      Delete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. So I wondering. I have no law degree but isn't recording telephone conversations illegal without consent?
    http://youtu.be/OcYfE5ZI3vM

    I love it when proclaim that the law states they can so this and then Maria uses another law which has nothing to do with the call she made.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In Texas if one of the two parties are aware of the recording, nope. It's legal. Its when a 3rd party intercepts then it is illegal.

      Delete
    2. This call was interstate which I is federal law.

      Delete
    3. Not an attorney either, but generally the state which is most restrictive is the one which you should abide. Make sense. NOTE: GOOGLE is your friend!

      Delete
    4. there are certain states that have it where.... (in a 2 way conversation only one person has to be notified) and then there are others that say both people have to be informed
      so, if You are in Texas and someone is calling from a state that requires both parties, then both people would have to be notified

      Delete
    5. here this is a very good source:
      http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

      Delete
    6. But ya California is a 2 party consent state

      Delete
    7. I concur with Sluggo and Brannon.

      Please never, ever expose yourself to legal problems by relying on something you read on a blog. I'm sure that is OBVIOUS to most.

      Delete
    8. Anon is that okay Susan Harbison?February 27, 2013 at 3:29 PM

      A little too late for that, tsk tsk tsk Maria, you thought 30 days in the slammer for having a cig was hell?! Rut Roh

      Delete
  16. Short answer: depends on the state.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is an open letter to Bill Windsor:

    William,

    In response to your request to cease and desist. As soon as I find something libelous, slanderous, defamatory to cease and desist from I will let you know.

    The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth". Truth is an absolute defense to an action for defamation.

    Another important defense against defamation is "opinion". If the person makes a statement of opinion as opposed to fact, the statement may not support a cause of action for defamation.

    And finally as you hold yourself out as a "public figure" under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice".

    A defense similar to opinion is "fair comment on a matter of public interest". If the mayor of a town is involved in a corruption scandal, expressing the opinion that you believe the allegations are true is not likely to support a cause of action for defamation.

    A person can also become a "limited public figure" by engaging in actions which generate publicity within a narrow area of interest. For example, a woman named Terry Rakolta was offended by the Fox Television show, Married With Children, and wrote letters to the show's advertisers to try to get them to stop their support for the show. As a result of her actions, Ms. Rakolta became the target of jokes in a wide variety of settings. As these jokes remained within the confines of her public conduct, typically making fun of her as being prudish or censorious, they were protected by Ms. Rakolta's status as a "limited public figure".

    If you want to waste your time and money fighting against, opinion, truth and becoming the butt of jokes as a result of your conduct as a public (or limited public figure) you will not win.

    I would strongly advise you to cease and desist and stay far out of my way.

    Albert J. Fiorini.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow---Bravo! I don't know what's more shocking---another person off the Kool-Aid or that Married with Children or that it was on Fox!

      But really awesome open letter, glad it was posted here since der Dummkopf removed it.

      Delete
    2. @Albert: Willy is very clearly a public figure for the purpose of a defamation claim. It is not even a close call.

      That said, I'm sure this is OBVIOUS to most, but please never, ever expose yourself to legal problems by relying on something you read on a blog.

      Delete
    3. Another post from Albert. This is what Bill says about his public figure status to get away with his tantrums.

      Albert Fiorini Here is Baffalo Bills Response: Gmail:

      I served a cease and desist notice on this person, and he violated it with unsolicited email within a few hours. This is a violation of your terms. Please consider terminating his email account.

      He has also threatened me in this email.

      I am neither a public figure not a limited public figure.

      I will file an action against this man for defamation, and if he continues, I will file a criminal complaint for harassment and stalking pursuant to Georgia statutes.

      Bill Windsor

      Delete
    4. Anybody have Margetis' address? PM me, thinking he might need to see a copy of Al's letter before wasting more court time.

      Also, appears Susan is having a little trouble removing that stick........

      Delete
    5. I see this, Bill sends out C&D emails to people over and over. When they respond, he gets them on harassment or whatever, because they responded to him, but he just deletes his prompting emails for the response. He sets people up to make him look like the victim, when in fact he is the aggressor.

      Delete
    6. You know he violated a C&D to AMPP a few times. FUCK YOU ya old coot!

      Delete
    7. So if bologna bill states he is not a political figure Then his revolutionary party video is where he claims the start of the party as if he is the head of it then that is a LIE and bill is a LIAR.

      Delete
    8. He keeps talking about filing criminal complaints' and everyone knows he is labeled as a Vexatious litigation (is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

      A single action, even a frivolous one, is usually not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Repeated and severe instances by a single lawyer or firm can result in eventual disbarment.

      Some jurisdictions have a list of vexatious litigants: people who have repeatedly abused the legal system. Because lawyers could be disbarred for participating in the abuse, vexatious litigants are often unable to retain legal counsel, and such litigants therefore represent themselves in court. Those on the list are usually either forbidden from any further legal action or are required to obtain prior permission from a senior judge before taking any legal action. The process by which a person is added to the list varies among jurisdictions. In liberal democratic jurisdictions, declaring someone a vexatious litigant is considered to be a serious measure and rarely occurs, as judges and officials are reluctant to curtail a person's access to the courts.)

      Delete
    9. He can't file anything, anywhere in the United States without going to Federal Court first. He is ridiculous!!!!!!!

      Delete
    10. Willy wrote; "I am neither a public figure not a limited public figure."

      I think it would be hilarious if Willy believes he is entitled to the same protection as a private citizen. He gave that up the day he opened LA, inserting himself into a debate about a matter of public concern.

      I know this is OBVIOUS to most.

      Delete
    11. Yes, and your last (and unnecessary)sentence is the perfect illustration of why people find it so hard to get along with you.

      Delete
    12. He thinks he can say and do whatever suits his purpose at that moment. He has proven via his past judicial antics that he does and will file frivolous suits just to annoy and harass his victims. Including all what, 30+ Judicial officers, attorneys, and others. (MOM)

      Now he says he's a "nobody" which falls in line to be a fake victim once again. While falsely accusing everyone under the sun with his manufactured "evidence" and here say. Oh, but wait, it's getting kinda hot up in here...Damn, I just lost my hard drive with my fake evidence.

      He is proving to not only be a vexatious litigant, but a vexatious person. Attack, harass, annoy, defame, slander, stalk and threaten to sue, anyone he sees fit to, in a malicious manor.

      Delete
    13. @OReader: You may have missed the various posts that criticized me on the grounds that my posts only mention things are OBVIOUS.

      I have no idea what is OBVIOUS to others because I frequently see people say things that are incorrect. I want to avoid setting off whatever demons cause some people to be offended by what they feel is old news Hence, I have taken to acknowledging as often as possible, that some of the people here already know everything there is to know about everything. It seems to me it is necessary to do that.

      Delete
    14. It just reads as snarky.

      Delete
    15. @OReader, That's because it is entirely meant that way.

      I hope that helps.

      Delete
    16. @Oreader: I've been given the nickname Captain Obvious. I am embracing it!

      I regret that new people might misinterpret the references, but without the statement I might seriously offend those that already know everything. I can only hope the new folks notice the pattern at some point and realize it is not about them.

      Delete
    17. Well I tend to at least overstate the obvious and usually manage to repeat myself at least three ways in most of my long posts. I'm sure I irritate people occasionally or even often, but most of the regulars here don't seem to have a problem with me.

      Delete
    18. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    19. @OReader: Yes, it is very OBVIOUS that the problem is not limited to the one particular thing. But this was the issue specifically complained of and I enjoy my nickname.

      The underlying problem is related to the offense of stating the obvious. Some people are deeply offended by my failure to recognize their superior knowledge, standing, and experience. And they don't like finding out that some of the things they have stated are not correct. ::shrugs:: Not my problem.

      Delete
  18. Lawless America
    5,030 likes · 789 talking about this

    Oops, the numbers are slipping awwwwwaaayyyyy
    Self destruction tantrums seem to be taking a toll. What new drama will he come up with, to distract the dangling lemmings with today?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That speaks volumes. Most people on facebook don't bother to unfriend or remove their likes. They just move on and never look back.

      Delete
    2. Oh thank you my new American friends. My family & I have been for to be removing ourselves at record speeds thanks to the generous donation from some vonderful benefactors. We may not have pie here but in Banglesh we have tenancity.
      There is a quote by Rabindranath Tagore that we would like to share with you, it goes:
      "রবীন্দ্রনাথ ঠাকুর"
      in English:
      "Gray hairs are signs of wisdom if you hold your tongue, speak and they are but hairs, as in the young. "

      The gray hairs that fill mr. vindsors head are most obviously not a sign of any wisdom. Thank you very much.

      P.S. Smeg is doing vonderful and we love that we have been for to be in your new movie, that especially cheered him up.

      Delete
    3. I read you once again in your own accent. It`s like magic or something. Can you do the cobra flute thing too?

      Delete
    4. I heart Dharma & Smeg. & their accents~

      **waves at Dharma & Smeg** oh! & all friends & family of ****waving***

      Delete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LOL So Mary D. is still pushing Bill to file this. She posted this comment under his post about his fake computer problems. So to Mary, please calm down, you have posted the same thing 4 or 5 times now. *face palm

    "Mary Deneen Bill, alleged "knowingly-willful" and "will-full neglect" civil and criminal (HIPAA) of 1996 Privacy Rule Federal Law violations w/ Medical Identity Theft followed by 'knowingly-willful" (Fraud, Fictitious, False) Statements, deceit, scheme and trickery 'to cause infliction of conscious and active harm to a minor child, you, and Lawless America' - for alleged co-conspirators and personal self-gain - federal crimes that require investigation under (FOIA) by The US Inspector General."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, she posts like this every time she says anything. Most of the time it doesn't even make sense. She likes to claim HIPPA and FOIA, as well as complain about how she was incarcerated(in a mental hospital) and drugged.

      She really is that special...

      Delete
    2. LOL I know. I was being modest with my 4 to 5 times posting it.

      Padded rooms for all I say.

      Delete
    3. they may qualify for a group rate?

      Delete
  21. So, the evolution from the sex thing in Texas(the Dave Webb back and forth, and how reported) to the Bill thing, & some leap, to then the Montana FREEMEN, to then branding the ones who appeared in Bill's Show as the home grown TALIAN.
    However, do you realize that even the A C L U can't get standing to challenge snooping, See the recent ruling by the Supremes( 5 to 4) on eavesdropping matters.
    But O'Read, and his Sugar Plums, Ginger etc are not the government, but, oh, does 'O"READ brag on how he can follow the tracking dials. meters, and #'s. Well, he just notes Bill is big on tracking, too.
    So, how does all that cyber bait play into all this ? And, Ms Harbison, is having trouble on figuring out what ANNON is different from some other ANNON.
    So, WORLD-Press is not the COP Patrol, or some other ISP..
    Some came on this WWW, lured by the BEACON Free press, to comment on public issues, a sense of civics. Yet, that is not , in large measure what is addressed here.
    Bill even bitches about Hilton HOTEL, and puts it on his BLOG.
    Bill seems to cry wolf, and bitch about ever facet of his travels, and the YEllow ribbons.
    He bitches about the State of Montana, this that.
    Bill is not the GOV.
    Has Bill done any public service as a civil servant. NONE.
    ZERO....Did Bill lurk some with his bait.
    BIll the baiter.
    But, any take the bait, then OCEAN goes off on how some are drugged and put in a MENTAL WARD.. How KGB-esque.
    Nija, the BIG Wheel, and his life as the lil bitch while Bill is the BiG BITCH.
    one of your brought up Max
    He used to say: pay-backs are a BITCH.









    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BIG wheel, little bitchFebruary 27, 2013 at 3:06 PM

      Hey look, it's loose again. Rambling on like anyone cares...

      Delete
    2. OK, whatever beacon you think you followed in here wasn't for you. And, I don't see anybody baiting you to stay. If you don't like what is being talked about, nobody is forcing you to stay.

      Delete
  22. That is right, BIG WHEEL -LIl B, nobody cares what is on this Blog, by
    Ginger's lil buggers, as she goes on and on about the snot in Bill's nose.
    But does nuff said, cover it, or will NIJA post up now for the 13 straight month that the
    people with white coats are now looking at all those Bill put on UTUBE, as ready for the WARD.
    They really need to examine the Bob Hurt utube tape, now there is one loco dude, but is he harmless, just some wack-job, mumbling around near the beach, or is he ready for a BILL-lipse event.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Nobody is forcing you to get a discount drink at 2 Daughters, either O-R.
    You think you have more 1st Amendment rights than Ms Harbison ?
    Who said anything about "force", other than you. O-R
    Are you are force kinda guy ? a FORCE-bot ?
    Free speech in American is not for me, or Harvey, you blather, in effect.
    Are you currently running the KGB, dude, pull you head out, this is AMERIKA.
    Yeah, check the snow cams, and the cams at Broadway and 8th AVE...
    Geez, dude, can't you get a job as Security in a 24 hour Walgreens...?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously you really should put the meth pipe down.

      Delete
    2. You said you were lured here. So yeah, you can leave then, nobody lured you here.

      Have I told Ms. Harbison not to have an opinion? No, I did not. Does that conversely mean that I can't give her mine and tell her that I think her opinion is wrong? Uh, no it doesn't. Two way street.

      It's Double Daughters, not two daughters. They are the conjoined twins of Mario. And, I don't generally go early enough for happy hour. For you I'd suggest the house specialty, the Bitch and Moan. However, if that isn't to your taste, Pirate Socks and Dead Parrots is lovely, and they also serve a local brew I think you'd like, Hazed and Infused.

      Delete
  24. I have a FUNNY feeling that LA won't be around very much longer. I find it hysterical that his computer crashed and he lost a lot of his "legal evidence " for his 37 complaint's he claimed were filed and everything that was on the hard drive

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes you are probably right. Timing of this, the fake t.v. show that never was, and never will be, and the various, 'it's all because of the haters who are working for the Govt.' just seems too perfect. Like someone is setting up their quick get away.

      Got the R.V. ready, being converted into the new toybota, now where are those passports...

      Delete
  25. My 'brotha from anotha motha' sent this to me; I think it's hysterial:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmpquNqXQaA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm pretty sure they showed us that video in school.

      Delete
    2. I LOVE that video!! LMAO

      Delete
  26. Bill will find away to blame, some guy in IDAHO, maybe at some nuclear LAB on radioactive waste, or the latest Sun spots(flares on the SUN) for obstructing justice because he had smoking gun, proof, or as he says undeniable evidence, that __________, fill in the blanks.
    It was es-p-in nodge, or a a change in the codes on the red phone at the White House, or some 1/2 cocked thing Bill can dream up for the canard of the month. But, at some point will he go: ha ha ha, it was all a big JOKE. Ha ha all of Bill's utube, VIDEO folks, Ha ha ha, it was all a big funny funny
    I am not kidding you his Dad used to write(not right) jokes for W C FIELDS, pull up some of that dudes quotes.

    ReplyDelete
  27. That is spot on, SPAWN was lured here.
    He thought it was a YELLOW tape event at 2 Daughters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, sure was. Thought I'd give that Hazed and Infused a try but I couldn't get pasted the pie smell.

      Delete
  28. Speaking of Bill and old TIMES:

    If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it.( W C Fields)

    You can't trust water: Even a straight stick turns crooked in it.
    W. C. Fields

    Can any of you top these W C truisms.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, this is the first thing you've said that makes sense, the WC Fields mentality and Billy are closely linked,

      If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull.

      I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally.

      Hell, I never vote for anybody, I always vote against.


      And for Sean:

      Ah, the patter of little feet around the house. There's nothing like having a midget for a butler.

      Delete
    2. It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his money.

      Delete
    3. uh oh....I feel a another video coming on...lmfao

      Delete
  29. You know that as a midget I can buy clothes cheaper at Walmart from the kids section. Thanks goodness they still have Spider-Man underpants and pajamas. Pays to be a midget. I dazzle the ladies every time I ring the door bell

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am jealous. Can you still get the velcro shoes?? (yep, I'm too dumb to tie my own laces. . . I'll just beat y'all to the punch)

      Delete
  30. Yes, that one from W C, on "its morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his money", that really hits the nail on the head on the BILL crusade to play his sheep flock, AKA, the Lemmings as Bill heads for the major cliff.
    Except, it is like a karma KICK back, now those played, and gamed by Bill are wondering if
    it was a set up, and he was using them, and some of the sheep see Bill as the BILLY GOAT.
    I mean Bill is not like an attorney who can legally charge them $ 285 / hr, and he says what he does is not practicing law.(HIS WWW, big proviso....(DISCLAIMER). So, then what is it ?
    Say, what was the situation in the MAIDEN M matter, didn't Bill have to pay a whole team of attorneys, were they milking the guy running the meters at a big clip per hour ? Some major MONEY.
    Bill never gets into that, does he, how odd. Does Bill have buyer's regret(remorse) that he never got a law license , and could use that ticket for some meter deals, don't your figure.
    So, instead, he has some GIG... what exactly is his GIG....?
    It is like a mystery to some still, that is why GINGERO(or some) are exploring, what is the
    BIll GIG.. ? WHAT, really.. ??? That is the $ 64,000 question.
    What is Bill's gig when all the sheets are pulled back ?



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill was represented initially, or at least Alcatraz was. At some point Bill went pro se. He filed extensively, and at least one of his documents was something like 500 pages. From what I remember MoM wasn't really able to prove much in damages, so in that way, Bill didn't lose, but due to his extensive filings and the cost of the attorneys on the other side having to deal with all of the filings, he was ordered to pay a very large settlement.

      That is a really an overly generic summary. There are documents where it was discussed here, and most of the the documents are linked over at the quatloos forum where they discussed it. Justia also paints a pretty good picture of the aftermath and the sheer volume of what Bill filed.

      In the court docs over at Justia, you will see some emails Bill wrote to MoM or their attorneys. They paint a pretty good picture of what a jerk he is. (in my opinion)

      Bill will tell you that he is smarter than pretty much all lawyers. And he'd probably tell you he wouldn't want to be one of them, but yeah, I bet if he could have a law degree, he would. It seems stupid he didn't pursue it if he had the opportunity and means. He says he had several successful businesses in college. One of them surely could have funded it, and what's a couple extra years in school when you can have another major credential under your belt?

      All of this is of course my opinion. But, if you haven't read many of the court docs, I suggest you do. They are VERY entertaining.

      Delete
  31. IS the key to understanding BIll, an application of FIELD-OLOGY

    No doubt exists that all women are crazy; it's only a question of degree.
    W. C. Fields

    It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.
    W. C. Fields

    I mean, look at how W C Fields has influenced the Windsor Household.
    Bill admits W C, was big in Sr's past.

    For too long, the pundits have over-looked W C Fields in the Windsor
    panorama.

    If any others have some W C -isms to apply, well, then, it is truly a fertile field to plow(no pun intended)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.