If you mess with bull, you get the horn or something like that. I slept in this morning, cleaned off my tooth brush, gave my dogs an extra scooby snack and went to my neighbor's farm and shared a touching moment with an alpaca. I'm ready to meet my fate.
As you all probably know by now, today is the day Bill Windsor is going to file charges against me for:
"libel, slander, defamation, and cyberstalking. I am filing criminal charges against you on Monday, and I will file one or more civil actions."
And as we have learned, whatever Bill says is true because he never lies, my impending incarceration is only minutes away. I'm sure they will take this blog down and tear apart the clubhouse. I'm gonna miss you guys. Maybe me and Joey can become crayon colored pen pals.
Signing off from the clubhouse,sniff sniff
I've done time.
ReplyDeleteI know ALL about it!
I'll put some money on your "books" & send you a "how to survive" guide letter asap. You can get anything you need inside by trading 2 soups & a stamp (soups=RamenNoodles & stamp=USpostage stamp/currency on the inside).
I hope IF I go back down, I get my same bunk!
I told our police chief what was up over coffee this morning. He giggle snorted. He said he was gonna pass it on to the county guys, so they could be prepared to haul me in. I love life in my town!
****waves to Ginger*****
I hope you told him about Billy after he had swallowed his coffee, telling someone about this in mid sip could be harmful to ones health
Deleteit is 11:13 in Billyland! I wonder if he yelled at some poor Police person yet!
DeleteHey Ginger, we'll just chill wit cha and wait it out together!
ReplyDeleteSo here's a giggle. I was back over at the last page and noticed that Allie was commenting on some posts. I had asked if her gag order expired before or after the video.
She said (I believe this is her posting)
"Anonymous February 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM
Expired before the video. Wasn't celebrating. Was very uncomfortably sad."
IF it had expired before she made her video, they WHY even bring that up? Like it was a surprise to her? Games, this is all just a bunch of stupid people looking for sympathy, posting their makeshift drama, and filling some emotional void.
Allie, really, grow up. If we can see through you, no wonder the Judge did too.
I do not think the gag order was taking down, I think someone ask her why would you post and risk everything...and she is now acting like the Pie Man
DeleteOf course she's lying. This is the problem with the masses of asses over in pie land. They all have severe credibility issues.
DeleteI doubt her ex would have served her those specific charges if she was not under some kind of gag order.
yeah hold my tiny shaking hands Ninja. I'm so nervous I can't stand it.
Delete**holding tiny hands*** I hope they give us a heads up. Some of us with tiny feet need might need extra time to make it to the bus. It's parked outside the club house, just in case.
DeleteSorry so scared too, couldn't type. got and extra need in there.
DeleteI'm trying to make sure I dont have any "killing tools" on my person. What about pens?
Delete
DeleteWhat about pens?
LMAO
*I'd like to buy a vowel Pat.... the letter " i "*
LMAO yappy. Yes, that would be the biggest threat to pie man of all. He has not one.
DeletePoor Billy!! How can a man go through his entire life without pens?
DeletePencils just don't cut it, people can erase that sh*t. sad :(
ROFLMAO masses of asses
ReplyDeleteGood one Ninja! To say that they all have credibility issues, begins with the fact that they are associating with Bill Windsor.
That they believe in these citizen grand juries goes to their gullibility and lack of well, just about everything. There will be no magical reversal of any cases, and no one will pay them back for the money they have spent, and custody cases will not be voided. Some of them may end up worse off for the association with Lawless America purely because they are getting and following bad legal advice.
All very true. I wonder if that is why he has that disclaimer stating he in not an attorney on his .com site. Cause when these people lose their cases, they are going to come looking for him.
DeleteAnd he can just slither back under his rock, hissing and pissing like normal, that they are just haters.
What? No more clubhouse? That means DW will cease to exist!
ReplyDeleteHis whole world is wrapped up in discovering Gingersnaps identity. He's Windsors media investigator. He wants Gingersnaps real identity so Windsor and Joey (and Joey's groupies) hail him their new hero, give him love and attention because he's all alone in his real world.
Nope, no love for DW, but he can share a piece of pie with Billy. It's got something real special in it.
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD9Ua7FuzyA
Dedicated to Ginger.
ReplyDelete*no actual implication implied, just thought we could crank the clubhouse up*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYou7SqyDdo
I think I found some case law that could keep Ginger out. She'll need to register as a Honky Tonk asap!
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVI-SRgGz9w
Yappy go check your FB messages...
Deletemake me!
DeleteCan't you see I am working? DJ is a totally important job in the clubhouse. ;)
Here's a video in case Billy's grandkids he no longer is able to see is listening.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GgAY76YscU
Here's something Ginger can sing as she leaves the clubhouse.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTJZHxdviKA
The voices in yappy's head have an eclectic selection of music eh?
I apologize Yappy. I didn't mean to interrupt.
DeleteYour DJ'ing is very important to the clubhouse!!
;) lol
DeleteTo be fair, I will post a song for the haters of the club especially Billy to rock out to.
I think he's playing this as he drives to his fictional police stations and courthouses to file his fictional papers he managed to finally get out of those damn printing machine tools.
(AKA... his lego station he has set up in the spare bedroom that used to be for those grandkids he can't see).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkpTs3PLRLI
and just to refresh you on what I'm up against:
ReplyDeleteWere you born mentally ill, or did it happen over time?
I would have thought you were more aware of criminal charges and the like since I have been advised that you were incarcerated for public drunkenness (if not more).
As most folks know, the charges have to first be filed where the victim lives. That would be here.
Virtually everything that you ever post is a lie, and you couldn’t prove any of the garbage you and yours have posted if your life depended on it. Thank you for replying to acknowledge that you received the cease and desist notice. Check the Georgia statutes on what happens when you persist past this point.
I demand that you immediately issue a retraction of everything you have ever said or that you have ever allowed to be posted, item by item, and issue a public apology.
We’ll have folks watching and listening.
Dude:
An investigative reporter has the goods on you. The media has been working on you for a month or more.
I believe you are a criminal destined for a mental facility. And I will be there laughing my ass off when it happens. I will investigate everything about you for the rest of my life.
You are a pathological liar. And if you don’t think I can do anything about it, you are a bigger fool than I thought.
Can we meet with the police at the air conditioner repair shop? If not, you name the spot.
YAY!! Stop the Silence should feel so incredibly honored too now be aligned with such an incredibly honorable human who can articulate, clear, concise and undeniable arguments such as this. *eye roll*
DeleteI wouldn't think that William M Windsor of Lawless America, asking if you were born mentally ill would be an insult to any child born with some kind of handicap.
Nor should Stop the Silence be worried about Lawless America posting the personal details and contact information of abused women and children on the internet.
Nope, all is well. Their reputation shall remain in tact. (they hope)
The Minister of Propaganda has announced that they have teamed up with another group.
ReplyDeleteAnyone want to email this new group and tell them what they just signed up with in Lawless?
Alan Horn, Sr. Advisor, at basicbus@gmail.com.
This is highly disturbing. So what, now he's going to glob onto another well established group to make him look bigger, all to discredit the work they have already done to protect children? Just how low will one man go for his own personal vendetta?
Deletewhy not? When you have lost all credibility, steal someone elses'
DeleteI wonder if this Stop the Silence group has heard from the AMPP's about how their new partner treats woman he decides to hate.
Deletedone..... https://www.facebook.com/StopCSA#!/StopCSA/posts/421800031230712?offset=0&total_comments=1
Deletenice, and once the AMPP's and others like maybe Loryn and company go tell their stories to this Stop the Silence group they might thing twice about this new alliance
DeleteI am sure William M Windsor has alerted the Stop The Silence group that there are "haters" as he calls them out to 'get him'.
DeleteStop The Silence needs to speak with Roxanne of HireLyrics, Don Bailey, AMPP, Abused Swan, Millions Mothers March, and all the other's that he has called 'haters' because they caught on to his scams.
yeah I'm sure he did, and if only a few people complain it wont do much, but when they hear from everyone I think it would be a little overwhelming for them.
DeleteOh wait. The Stop the Silence people are a non-profit organization. Someone was looking to use a real non-profit to funnel money through. Connection timing is just too close.
DeleteJust like when he said they needed to hit 50K followers a week or so ago when they were only at half. Then they went over the 50K and he hid them.
Transparent fat ass.
I find it funny myself that the abused swan believes also that citizen grand jury's will reverse her case of custody and those grand jury's will put those judges in jail.
DeleteNo shit? Someone really believes that? ouch....you know being that dense has got to be painful! It makes my brain hurt reading it....
DeleteYAPPY!!! I need a pain shot! Somebody! stat!!!
As most folks know, the charges have to first be filed where the victim lives. That would be here.
ReplyDeleteIf Billy actually files in Cobb, the paperwork will be "chiffonade a popo" --shredded and in the dumpster before Bill gets out the front door. Can you image being Bill's next door neighbor? I think I'd have shoved a weed-wacker up Bill's...um...driveway by now.
Anyway, I can't wait to send Billy a gift when he's finally incarcerated for his deeds...it will be a soap-on-a-rope...with a defective rope!
oh my gawd oh my gawd everyone needs to watch these ninjas: also Gingersnap you need to learn this so when the cops come:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX7QNWEGcNI
Damnit Brannon you aren't supposed to show the trade secrets. SHHHHHHHHH No one outside the club house must know....
Deletewell ya, my bad ninja, hahaha I totally forgot we had our own clubhouse ninja, lol
DeleteLOL it's ok. Billy and the gang can watch, but they will never be as cool as the kids in the clubhouse.
DeleteI dont think me or Sean are going to be able to pull those moves off, you know with our tiny hands and feet
DeleteI hear there's extensions that strap on to "tiny feet". Maybe try that out?
DeleteI heard if you eat spinach it might help, at least that's what Popeye the Sailor Man Toot toot told me
DeleteDo not make fun of tiny little feet. Some of us can still wear kids shoes. It probably explains why I am always falling down . . .
Deleteyep, just opened myself up for a whole bunch of flogging . . .
"yep, just opened myself up for a whole bunch of flogging . . ."
DeleteYup.. you sure did!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU9g5h62BAA
Oh, sorry, you said flogging. ooops :P
Deletehttp://www.mdjonline.com/pages/cobblegal
ReplyDeleteI've checked Windsor's local paper, The Marietta Daily Journal (online edition), for the last several days--no notice of Windsor's house/property being raided or ceased. IMHO, we need to make sure we're not the vector of rumors.
I'm not really sure where that one came from other than I guess it was an offshoot of the judgement where Bill is ordered to pay $500 a day.
DeleteThe lady that posts on here, Susan speculated. When I was commenting on the blogtalk with Brannon, I did state I didn't know if it were true or not.
DeleteI don't believe all seizures would be posted publicly, there are an immense amount of foreclosures. I agree, we have to be careful how we word things and label them as a rumor until it can be backed up with facts.
Windsor's regular house he resides at is in Fulton County. I'm not sure they're even allowed out in Marietta house anymore? But the tax records for both properties are still in their names.
DeleteYappy, I'm not at liberty to go into details, but I have very good reasons to respectfully disagree Bill and Barb are now in Fulton and not Cobb. Indeed, even in his email, Billy said he was going to file charges against Ginger in Cobb--why would he do that? I don't think Cobb would have any jurisdiction if the Windsors had their legal residence in Fulton. Make sense?
DeleteOk, no problem sorry for the error. Thanks Sluggo, much appreciated :)
DeleteI wonder what they're using the Fulton property for? Hmmmm unless that is Barbara's full time residence. He has mentioned repeatedly over months how she's in Atlanta, not Marietta.
Sluggo, that brings up some interesting details.
DeleteFulton - the assessor has Y for homestead exemption on the assessment, but when I go to look at the bill, it looks like they are paying school taxes and there is no actual exemption (also, no homestead exemption is shown on their notice of value - even though it is Y on the main page.)
Cobb - they do have the homestead exemption on the house in Cobb county and are receiving a tax discount. Meaning, they don't have to pay school taxes which amount to almost $7,600 annually.
Now, their Cobb county assessment gets mailed to Fulton. So, one would assume they are in Fulton. But, aren't you supposed to claim homestead exemption on the place you are actually living? (And I'm still a little confused about the main page of Fulton showing a homestead exemption, I'm wondering if it wasn't on for 2012, but will be for 2013. Even if Barbara and Bill were to be estranged, they can only claim one homestead. Or at least that is how it is in the state which I reside . . . )But, I would like to point out that it is very convenient that they claim exemptions on the more expensive home . . . they'd pay more than 50% more in Cobb than Fulton . . .
Now, hopefully that makes sense, and I wrote the right county every time.
Well done, OReader! I think you're correct on every point.
DeleteGINGER, I'M SCARED!!!! WHAT IF WE ALL END UP IN JAIL?!?!?!?!?!?!
ReplyDeletehttp://farm3.staticflickr.com/2577/3876755429_c763e072fb_z.jpg
lol, you always kill me
Delete
Deletelol, you always kill me.....
apparently hungry jailers might too by the looks of you behind bars.
Just keep those killin tools handy. I'm watchin the hunger games, then switchin over to the walking dead for inspiration.... Goin incognito..... I think the google police are outside.....shhhhhhhhhhh. If you need some stuff, I get mine here..http://zombietools.net/
DeleteBrilliant! (The good news is it looks like minimum security, ie, no razor wire) ;-)
Deleteyeah I can't go to jail....everyone is gonna want a piece of me
DeleteYou can always tell them you're the real cookie monster.
DeleteGov. Rick Perry is a hero.
ReplyDeleteWait, is Ginger Gov Perry? Or is there some breaking news? Perry ran into a burning school and saved all the children? Did I miss some kind of comment earlier? Did Perry ban Windsor from coming back to Texas?
DeleteI need more info . . .
No comment.
DeleteUpdates @6 o clock news
6 O'clock news? specifically which affiliate? in which Texas city? which network?
DeleteIs this 6 O'clock news even in Texas?
I forgot who borrowed my de-coder ring. Whichever Snap has it, please use it to decode this Anon/Gov Perry is a hero thing....
Perhaps he's (Gov Perry) gonna pardon Ginger & any of the rest of us from Windsor's alleged crimes against pie?
read the new post Petunia
DeleteMaybe is has something to do with Chris Kyle's funeral today. It was at Cowboy's Stadium.
DeleteThe main LA FB page is down again - https://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica
ReplyDeleteI thought I was going down today, instead its the lawless facebook page
DeleteHummm I wonder if someone looked into the suspicious jump in facebook followers? From the faceless pics to the symbols instead of names to all those overseas people. Just interesting timing.
Deletehe set it up as a personal profile, when it a fake movie and buy like.....Facebook not a fan of that
Deleteall that wasted money on buying fake like ......omg it gone http://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica?ref=ts&fref=ts
DeleteNever underestimate the POWER of extremely pisses off HUMANS.
DeleteJust so happens that not only was fb notified about that ONE picture, they were also notified about the fakes he bought and other things he has done to harass. Have a NICE day Bill :)
Deletehttp://i47.tinypic.com/4kfo5.png
he could not take down the dumb-ass america youtube post, so he just took down everything he just posted ......I am laughing so hard I have tears
DeleteBill Windsor was at Sing Sing Prison.
DeleteWE WISH, but you may be seeing the inside of a cell real soon Bill..don't worry
There's a new post on the LA web that says:
ReplyDelete"Lawless America's Facebook page is being converted to a new format. We have been trying to get this done for two months. So, until further notice, go to https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1. And simply check here for all the news."
But even that page is down.
-------------------
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1311:lawless-america-is-changing-its-facebook-page&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105
Correction - it's not really down, he just hyperlinked it to the wrong URL - /lawlessamerica1, rather than /billwindsor1.
Deletehttps://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1
I think he did not like me posting he is a con man today
DeleteWE LIVE IN LAWLESS AMERICA.
ReplyDeleteIt's time. We want our country back. And we are going to get it.
Starting April 1, 2013, Lawless America Nobodies will file criminal charges nationwide against corrupt judges, attorneys, witnesses, and government officials of all types. If these criminals are not prosecuted by those currently in power, we will conduct our own trials.
We will make room in the prisons by releasing all who were wrongfully convicted or who are in prison for victimless crimes. That will open 80% of the space in our prisons, so we will have plenty of room and save gazillions of dollars.
So they want to lock up all our elected officials while letting out 80% of the duly convicted criminals to roam the streets. I wander if "Stop the Silence" is on board with this mission statement?
I told them to read all their lies on his page and now it gone....funny
DeleteHow exactly are they going to determine who was wrongfully convicted? And just because a crime is victimless, aren't most of these crimes because of the potential victims? Like say DUI . . . maybe nobody got hurt, but the potential is very high. And is there a victim if nobody is physically harmed? Does he think that theft is a victimless crime? Does he have numbers to support this number representing 80% of people in prison? Maybe jail, but prison? I'm pretty sure most of the population in prison represents substantial crimes that do involve victims and have been proven.
DeleteQ. How can he file anything against anyone on behalf of America when he has been labeled a vexatious litigant and can not file unless he posts a bond and or gets permission from the court?
DeleteHe's filing with his own pretend juries in his pretend courts. Eventually when he rules the world, it will all work retroactively.
DeleteGazillions of dollars?
DeleteHe really wrote that?
He declares himself a soverign citizen, declares that the constitution we are living under isnull and void. Then he issues freeman warrants in accordance with the posse comattus act. Hold a citizen grand jury, issue conviction, issue fake freeman leans and start printing his own money. Believe me, I've been there..... Look up jackyia ford, one of his followers.
DeleteOne of his family members needs to file for a 5150 hold. This guy is out of control. It's not funny anymore. I swear, he is looking more and more like a cult leader every day.
DeleteDo you happen to have a citation for his soverign citizen declaration?
DeleteNinja.... I think you're onto something!!!
DeleteJust a little website article but hell, if the shoe fits?
http://www.caic.org.au/general/cultcrit.htm
lol wow
Holy crap. That IS the pie man to a "T".
DeleteLawless America the Cult
Lawsuit America the Cult Plan of Operation
All of the 8 points fit like a pie to BIlly. This is my fav:
Delete5. SACRED SCIENCE. The group's perspective is absolutely true and completely adequate to explain EVERYTHING. The doctrine is not subject to amendments or question. ABSOLUTE conformity to the doctrine is required.
All of the 8 points fit like a pie to BIlly. This is my fav:
Delete5. SACRED SCIENCE. The group's perspective is absolutely true and completely adequate to explain EVERYTHING. The doctrine is not subject to amendments or question. ABSOLUTE conformity to the doctrine is required.
LMAO Plan Of Operation= POO I just got that LOLOLOLOL
Delete
Delete"Ladies and gentleman of the Grand Jury..."
http://i50.tinypic.com/2wfjz3t.jpg
Ouch! Billy, is there a way to buy fake viewers for your lawlessamerica.com? Apparently your site has low traffic. Wonder how low? Does anyone's place of employment have a compete.com pro plan?
ReplyDeletehttp://oi49.tinypic.com/33dbnd5.jpg
Ouch, that's gotta hurt the 'ol ego.
DeleteThe other day I decided I would try to get away and forget about The Piehole for a while, so sat down and tried to watch a horror film by Jose Mojica Marins, La Encarnacion Del Demonio or Embodiment of Evil (2008). I wrote I tried to watch it...five minutes in, the main character is reveled...REMIND YOU OF ANYONE?
ReplyDeletehttp://i50.tinypic.com/2crkhfa.png
LOL a touch too much. Eeekk
DeleteI agree...those finger nails are too much!
Deletehttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America/195697210566617?ref=ts&fref=ts
ReplyDeleteLMAO I wonder how long until they notice that. LOLOLOL
DeleteHe's a LIAR, a con, a fraud, he's lost his mind, he's delusional.
DeleteALL TRUTH!
Hope you're not too upset about your page but you get what you get for being a bully and you messed with the wrong ones.
http://tinypic.com/r/4kfo5/6
Boom! Good,
DeleteHe is now considered a cult leader. Up above, Yappy posted an article that describes him perfectly.
Any idea what the image was? Also, if you think Bill Windsor won't blow his ever lovin' mind (what's left of it) when he finds out about this censored image, then, well, you don't know Bill Windsor.
DeleteSarah's waxman paid troll, show me that trick ....he may not be able to take it down
DeleteIf you are talking about the pic from "V" it was a copy of a fb confirmation of picture removal from LA.
DeleteThe image was of him disposing his minions to find others ss#'s, license etc. The image as you can remember was merely of a "spyglass". But it was the additional information provided to facebook regarding the fake likes, the continual harassment of dv vicmtims (and their children) and everything else in between. So another LIE that the page is being re-done. So I hope that his day with po-po's went fabulous. He violated fb community standard on bullying and harassment. If he thinks he will continue to get away with all of his he should now know he is mistaken.
DeleteI have a lot of trouble following what you all seem to understand in these threads, lol. Can someone please correct me where necessary?
DeleteHIs FB page was shut down because of the fake friends?
FB removed that magnifying glass image with the text asking people to dig into other people's private information?
Why is he saying the old page will become a "fan page"? Does anyone know what that means?
So will his new page have to start all over getting friends?
This shit is confusing the hell out of me!
Here ya go..from the way back machine. http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=805:how-to-reach-a-grand-jury-to-present-criminal-charges-against-corrupt-judges-attorneys-and-government-officials-big-audience-expected-for-talkshoe-on-april-5-2012-&catid=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105
Delete@ susan. We have no idea if his page was shut down due to violating FB policies or if he is actually converting his pages. He lies so much it's hard to tell.
DeleteIf he converts his page, everything he had before including followers and friends goes with him and converts to likes or something like that.
The fan page just means he can have more members or likes and give him more 'room' to fudge stuff.
FOLKS, WE'VE BEEN SAYING FOR MONTHS THAT THE LAWLESS AMERICA FACEBOOK PAGE WOULD CHANGE ANY TIME. WELL, IT IS CHANGED. PLEASE EMAIL AND MESSAGE ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS, AND ENCOURAGE THEM TO LIKE THE NEW PAGE.
Deletehttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America/195697210566617
We are going to lose thousands of people in this conversion, but it had to be done. When I set the page up initially, I did not know there was a difference between people pages and cause/movie pages. We have as many as 100,000 in our various databases, so we will be emailing them over the next month to come find the "fan" page.
LIES
Did anyone else ever hear him say this: FOLKS, WE'VE BEEN SAYING FOR MONTHS THAT THE LAWLESS AMERICA FACEBOOK PAGE WOULD CHANGE ANY TIME. WELL, IT IS CHANGED.
DeleteAll I ever heard was that he was dumping FB because they didn't give in to his demands to shut down haters!
it's like he's gas lighting everyone.
Deletewhy wouldn't he say something about it on his Natzi Radio Suicide Show last night? I mean that would seem like a pretty important point to tell the lemmings and give them directions to which cliff to jump off of??? DUH, he's a lia, a fraud, a con, he's lost his mind, he's delusional. . .
DeleteBill has said they were switching pages several times in the last few weeks. The first time I heard/read it was on Talkshoe a couple of weeks before DC. I've been checking on it since then but nobody as been using it much.
DeleteI think he had planned to switch over, but he got in trouble with FB and it was forced today.
DeleteHe would have mentioned it last night if he knew. I don't think he did. I also don't think he can move any of the followers or content, because the page was seized by FB.
He said he would let everyone know when they were ready to unveil the new page, and it is exactly the same as it has been the whole time.
Billy is going to speak to the Nation??? WTF is he smoking? Is this like the pretend speaking to every senator and congress member in DC? What, is he going to post that he's having a special talkshitshoe show and everyone shoud tune in?
ReplyDeleteLawless America shared The Revolutionary Party's photo.
10 minutes ago.
BILL WINDSOR OF THE REVOLUTIONARY PARTY WILL SPEAK TO THE NATION ON FEBRUARY 12, 2013 IN A STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS.
State of CONFUSION more like it.
DeleteOff topic but I don't know if people go back and read things higher on the threads here.
DeleteWindsor has never been barred from filing "any lawsuit anywhere". The original order said, Windsor is ORDERED not to file in any court any new lawsuit which involves claims arising from the same factual predicate or nucleus of operative facts as the instant case (referring to MOM).
After he violated that order, the court said, "The Plaintiff is ordered to post a cash bond or corporate surety bond acceptable to the Clerk in the amount of $50,000.00 to satisfy any award of Rule 11 sanctions before filing any additional papers in this case without the consent of the Court."
He is free to file any new case anywhere, as long as the facts are unrelated to any of his previous MoM litigation.
Ok then I guess that is just one more lie he told. In an article he wrote himself, which is the main driving force of his vendetta's he claims he can not file any law suit anywhere.
DeleteI know I posted this before to you. What do you think of this?
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=416:windsor-banned-from-filing-a-lawsuit-anywhere-in-america&catid=120:news-reports&Itemid=222
What facts would he have? There is NONE. None of what he says or said is true. I know for a fact that no one I know sent him death threats, cyber stalked him or any other wrongs that he has imagined. You can't file a court document stating that someone has been a "Big Meanie" to you because he attacked them and they responded back. BRING IT ON I say. Been waiting for WEEKS to be erased from the earth (as he said in his HATE video). All started because some people do not agree that grandparents should be on birth certifcates. Disagree with him and you're toast, haven't you seen the pattern? Him and that horse he rode on can go to hell. Just because we don't post everything we're doing (like he does) he's underestimated what he started. I intend to make sure that no other human has to put up with the likes of him and his lemmings.
Deletefrom what I read this morning, he is deemed vexatious in both state (GA) and Federal courts in Georgia. He tried to get the state court to issue orders against the Federal judges after the initial order came down requiring the $50,000 bond and approval to file requirements.
Delete@Susan please google "William M Windsor Banned from filing lawsuits." You can also add "Anywhere in America" to that.
DeleteSo, if this is not true, then he LIED to get attention, make people feel sorry for him, mislead his followers, you know, basically just committed more fraud upon "the people" he is pretending to represent in his cult following.
Ninja scanned that motion he wrote. I just can't make myself actually read his ravings. But whether he lied about being BANNED from filing any lawsuit anywhere or that was just his skewed perception of the order, his headline for that article is incorrect.
DeleteSince most of his headlines are "off" in terms of honesty, I think they are deliberate.
At a glance, the average person freaks out at the idea that he could have lost his rights as a citizen forever! That's the kind of decision that should concern every citizen of this country.
On the other hand, how many people care that he was finally told he has exhausted all possible reasons to bring claims against anyone involved in the MoM case and that the court will not entertain another word about it?
Oh how I wish we could edit posts. My first sentence above was supposed to say, Ninja, I scanned....
DeleteAll you really need to know:
DeleteA legal action or proceeding initiated maliciously and without Probable Cause by an individual who is not acting in Good Faith for the purpose of annoying or embarrassing an opponent.
The U.S. legal system permits persons to file civil lawsuits to seek redress for injuries committed by a defendant. However, a legal action that is not likely to lead to any practical result is classified as vexatious litigation. Such litigation is regarded as frivolous and will result in the dismissal of the action by the court. A person who has been subjected to vexatious litigation may sue the plaintiff for Malicious Prosecution, seeking damages for any costs and injuries associated with the original lawsuit.
Litigation is typically classified as vexatious when an attorney or a pro se litigant (a person representing himself without an attorney) repeatedly files groundless lawsuits and repeatedly loses. Under the Common Law, the frequent incitement of lawsuits by an attorney constituted the crime of Barratry. In modern law, however, barratry is viewed as an archaic crime and is rarely enforced. Attorneys who encourage vexatious litigation are subject to discipline for violating rules of professional conduct and may be suspended from the Practice of Law or disbarred.
Sometimes pro se litigants who have lost their initial lawsuits file new actions based on the dispute contained in the original suit. Because the judgment of the original case is dispositive, a court will ultimately dismiss these new actions. To avoid the expenditure of court resources, as well as the costs associated with the defendant's defense of repeated frivolous claims, a court may issue an order forbidding the pro se litigant to file any new actions without permission of the court.
Vexatious litigation is a type of malicious prosecution that enables the defendant to file a tort action against the plaintiff. A plaintiff in a malicious prosecution must prove that a legal proceeding (or multiple proceedings) was instituted by the defendant, that the original proceeding was terminated in favor of the plaintiff, that there was no probable cause for the original proceeding, and that malice, or a primary purpose other than that of bringing the original action, motivated the defendant. A plaintiff in such an action may recover, for example, the expenses incurred in defending the original suit or suits, as well as resulting financial loss or injury. A plaintiff may also recover damages for mental suffering of a kind that would normally be expected to follow from the original action.
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ads by Google
$29 Cheap Auto Insurance
Low Auto Insurance Rates From $29! Free Quotes For All US Drivers.
USAutoInsuranceNow.com
vexatious litigation n. filing a lawsuit with the knowledge that it has no legal basis, with its purpose to bother, annoy, embarrass and cause legal expenses to the defendant. Vexatious litigation includes continuing a lawsuit after discovery of the facts shows it has absolutely no merit. Upon judgment for the defendant, he/she has the right to file a suit for "malicious prosecution" against the original vexatious plaintiff. Moreover, most states allow a judge to penalize a plaintiff and his/her attorney for filing or continuing a "frivolous" legal action with sanctions (money award to the defendant for the trouble and/or attorney fees). (See: malicious prosecution, sanction)
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
In this article it says Windsor cannot file suit in any court within the U.S. without federal judicial permission and must first put up a $50,000 bond if he names judges or other federal employees as defendants. - http://veracityvoice.com/?p=11668)
DeleteSorry Ninja, I just saw your second post to me above. You are correct. He has lied to everyone to make them believe the courts have gone so far as to bar him from every filing anything, anywhere. Such an order would mean he can't seek recourse for any injury caused by someone's negligence, he can't sue for a contract dispute, etc. Such an order would be such a blatant violation of his Constitutional rights that it would have made REAL headlines.
DeleteOoops - there shouldn't be a ) at the end.
Deletehttp://veracityvoice.com/?p=11668
Anon you are going to find repetitions of Windsor's ridiculous claims that he can't file anything anywhere, all over the Net. Some people either accepted his claim and repeated it, or, more likely, they simply let him write his own article.
DeleteJanet Phelan was an LA supporter for a few minutes. I think she defected, but I'm not sure.
HA! Thus the CON MAN name that he hates to be called. He is everything he claims he is not.
DeleteI now add into that pile of crap he calls a life, HE IS A CULT LEADER.
Susan, I do appreciate your concern. And for the record, I have no idea if Billy can file charges on me or not. But I'm still very comfortable about the situation.
DeleteAs to me responsible for user's comments on my blog, the answer is no. In fact we have literally been through this in a separate lawsuit. Since I don't moderate anything, only the parties responsible for posting the stuff can be held liable. Sure someone could try and tack me on in the lawsuit, but it wont hold up.
Ok I just went back and read where you said "not" responsible for others posts. So ammend my statement. And you are right everyone that posts on here should know they can be held responsible for it
Deletehttp://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=7690
ReplyDeleteread this thread about his vexatious status - there are some links to the rulings, and overall it's pretty damn funny about Bill Windsor. Includes a response post that we are all used to seeing.
enjoy
Oh re. the Phelan article. She reported the order accurately: "According to the order issued by Judge Thomas Thrash, Windsor may not file suit in any court within the U.S. without federal judicial permission and must first put up a $50,000 bond if he names judges or other federal employees as defendants."
ReplyDeleteThe odd thing is I can't find this order anywhere. I've checked Westlaw and it's not there.
I saw someone here quote an excerpt from it and that post claimed the order came out on July 15, 2011, but I can't find it. I'm not sure Windsor ever linked to it when he wrote his article about it. It's got to be on line somewhere but I can't find it, grrrrr.
@susan
Deletehttp://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2013/02/critical-day-3-of-failure-in-dc-is-over.html
Check the post by John at 3:35
That is the case with the new daily penalty. I don't know if there is something in that post to help locate the other order
lol, he is trying to figure out how to run his new page, the lemmings and confused and jumping off the cliff, and our clubhouse gang is running free all over the place. This is just too funny to watch
DeleteLooks like he woosed out. He made it sound like the new page would be some awesome piece of work, and they weren't going to show it, until they were ready. Then he posts the link to the already up and running one, where quite a few GS folks play. LMAO, and he said he's going to lose 1000's.
DeleteI dont' buy it. He's covering his ass, and it looks like FB slapped him for his fake followers. Shut down that other page. Wouldn't let him take anything with him to the new one. That is the only logical explanation I can see.
I read the thread on Quantaloos. I couldn't find the actual order there either. People here obviously have some super powers when it comes to finding stuff, I hope one of them will prove me wrong about the orders not being available!
ReplyDeleteBtw, the appellate court's opinion upholding the original order which said that Windsor could not file anything else about the MoM case, is on line and says:
The Court concludes that its injunction properly limited Windsor's ability to file new lawsuits in other trial courts, so long as that limit hinged on those new suits stemming from the same set of facts underlying the closed case before the undersigned. The injunction on Martin–Trigona targeted his propensity to file new, frivolous lawsuits across the country by limiting his ability to do so; the Court's injunction here targets Windsor's propensity to continue rehashing issues of fact and law already conclusively determined by this Court and the Court of Appeals, and the Court concludes that it may limit Windsor's ability to do so elsewhere.
Maid of Mist Corp. v. Alcatraz Media, LLC, 1:06-CV-0714-ODE, 2010 WL 1687810 (N.D. Ga. Apr. 26, 2010) aff'd sub nom. Maid of the Mist Corp. v. Alcatraz Media, LLC, 446 F. App'x 162 (11th Cir. 2011)
I wish I could highlight some of the text but I don't see that option here, sniffle.
SpawnFebruary 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM
ReplyDeleteSo Slanderfella just received this:
Susan Harbison
GS, on the very, very slim chance that you have not thoroughly researched cyberstalking and cyberharrassment laws, I am going to suggest that you do so.
I'm sure you know that as the site owner you are not responsible for what your guests say.
I'm not sure what choice of law applies to your situation. TX does not appear to have any cyber stalking or cyber harassment laws, I don't know what Georgia's criminal law is.
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/telecom/cyberstalking-and-cyberharassment-laws.aspx
I think it may cross some lines to follow him around the Net for the stated purpose of destroying his relationships with others (Washington Post, the TV show, other activist groups).
I believe I've seen some clear admissions of malice and intent to harm Windsor on your site. I'm not saying they came from you, I just know I have seen it. These writer's have given him solid claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with business, etc.
It is fairly easy to stay on the right side of the law and still convey the messages you want to convey about Windsor. But, for some reason, everyone is acting as if there are no laws that will protect Windsor. He does have legal recourse. Whether he will ever go to the incredible trouble of exercising that right, I don't know. But I don't want to find out either. Even if the case is dismissed very early, it will only occur after the defendant invests a lot of time to get it done. What's the point in inviting that? smh
He's the world's biggest ass, and I love that you are exposing him. I'm just suggesting you don't unnecessarily hand him what he needs for criminal charges or civil claims.
Regards,
Susan
Yes, I sent that to him. And the reason I sent it privately, is because I didn't want Windsor to see it. I was hoping GS might circulate it privately so that, as I said about Windsor and his movie, people here might take a "first do no harm" (to themselves) approach.
ReplyDeleteWhen this guy falls on his face and loses his followers to a better leader (and that IS what is going to happen) the only place he will have to vent his rage is on the posters here. I won't say anymore about it where he can read, but people should not assume he is without options.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI highly doubt that after Windsor falls on his ass, there is anyone who would support him in filing suits against bloggers.
DeleteHe has discredited himself by his own articles of which have been the basis of the posts by said bloggers. (As well as the horrible things he has filed against Judges which will be used against him in any suit against anyone)
On the other hand if he tried, there would be plenty of people to support those he tries to go after, in their support of outing the largest con to protect victims of his fraud. Just my opinion.
Unfortunately Ninja, the court doesn't, or isn't supposed to, decide cases because people think they were morally justified in doing something. The claims that would be involved are complicated and I'm not going to get into them here.
DeleteI'm just telling you there are plenty of things you can say but there are some things you should not say.
The burden of proof falls on the one who files suit. I am saying that not only would he have a slim to none chance of proving any of the outlandish claims he makes against others, but the defense of those others would have way more support via testimony of witnesses to discredit him, and his cry baby claims.
DeleteHe told someone here, that he doesn't need to prove anything, they do. He once again is dead wrong. Probably why he has never won any lawsuits he has filed.
Susan, slanderfella isn't Ginger. Ginger isn't even an admin there as far as I know. I don't know if she has even ever even commented there.
DeleteGinger's email is around here somewhere.
Thanks for clarifying that Oreader! GS has commented on the FB page. I tried to find an email for GS but couldn't, so I figured the best private mail was through FB.
DeleteNinja, there the burden of proof shifts. Windsor has to prove the elements of his claim. Then the burden is on the defendant to prove her actions fall under one of the recognized defenses.
DeleteLike I said, it's complicated.
Thank you!
DeleteGail Denise Schumacher Where is the page with 50,000 likes?
ReplyDeleteI think they all packed up their FB accounts and headed to DC.
DeleteHi Ninja, that post by Smith is the recent contempt order. That one is easily accessible.
ReplyDeleteMany Federal Courts have all opinions on line at the actual court site. One of the Federal Courts in Georgia has that option, but the Northern District Court doesn't have it yet. :(
I know, it's hard to hunt this stuff down. If you have a pacer account, that is the only thing I can think of to find what you are looking for. I don't have access to that. Google is my friend, but we have a love hate relationship. :-)
DeleteI have a full Protective Order, he post all my info and beg people to attack me, another with a PO, he e-mail her ex asking if he like to be film telling the world how bad she is..... I went to a lawyer, he is out of state, she said more likely I would win, but I would never see a dime
ReplyDeleteHe call himself a public person with all his page and running for office, so this is Fair game after everything he did!!!!!!
Yes NInja, I looked at the appellate record on PACER last night. I don't know which of his many District Court cases has the order in it. Maybe I'll look tonight. I just thought that since there are excerpts from it on line it must be accessible somewhere other than PACER.
ReplyDeleteIf I find the orders I'll save them and bring them here for posterity.
Ok cool. It might be easier to find stuff, if there weren't mounds of suits to go through. And he didn't flood the www with his b.s. interpretation of court orders.
DeleteHe doesn't understand why there are so many different bloggers and sites out there that make fun of him. My favorite is the youtube video where the guy is setting the record straight that Windsor did NOT have constitution voided. He is holding back the laughter.
So, it's not just GS's group, there are tons, and he gives everyone the ammunition to use against him, in his own words.
Oh you mean the guy that took the trouble to research the origins of Windsor's "press release"? I love that. The "press release" is what originally took me to Windsor's site. As soon as I saw his first few lies about other things, I looked into the origin of the PR. At that point I knew he had no scruples.
DeleteNevertheless, I stuck around in the hopes that his only moral flaw was his tendency to stretch the truth far beyond what qualifies as honest. Then I saw how he treated people and I knew he was an unethical, bullying, rat.
His "death threat" period was the best! That took my negative thoughts about him to a whole new level, lol.
Zombie Hunter, I suspect he is judgment proof. I do wonder what he would do, if everyone that can, did sue him.
DeleteBut just because it is impractical for you to sue him, does not mean he won't sue you.
I don't want to rain on anyone's parade here. I don't want to scare people into thinking they shouldn't continue discussing him. I'm just saying, it would be wise to take some care about it.
Interesting susan, but what about our intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference? What about the fact he posts our homeaddresses, hacks into accounts, sends emails with our names on it, emails 200 of our coworkers and law enforcement claiming I am trying to kill him. Then, makes plans to come to my workplace sayinghe is bringing big men with guns. Why are psychopaths like windsor allowed to walk free? I'm sitting here with a shotgun waiting, is that intentional infliction of emotional distress? Unfortunately he's not the last scum on the earth.
ReplyDeleteExactly Anon@6:47 HE attacked several individuals and WE have the right to fight back. Using his own words, screen shots and contacting authorities is the right way. Nothing that has been done from this side could ever ben construed as anything criminal or civil, he's a "public figure".
DeleteI would also like to mention his thoughts on "grand juries"
"Ms. Nwokocha accosted me on August 30 in the elevator lobby outside the Fulton County District Attorney's Office, slobbered all over me as she invaded my personal space, accused me of criminal trespassing, and issued a "Criminal Trespass Warning" to me. I will be arrested on sight if I ever return to the District Attorney's Office which is where the Grand Jurors are hidden."
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=464:exciting-new-developments-in-atlanta-grand-jury-tampering-probe&catid=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105
SLOBBERED ALL OVER HIM? WHO TALKS LIKE THAT?
Billy Koreshs' view on grand juries
Deletehttp://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105&layout=default
Cynthia Nwokocha, who was foaming at the mouth like a rabid animal as she got in my face, issued this Criminal Notice to me.
Deletehttp://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/legal/Grand-Jury/criminal-trespass-warning-2011-08-30.pdf
Yesterday, I had a courier deliver over 100 personally-addressed envelopes marked "Personal & Confidential" to every employee I could identify in the Office of the Fulton County District Attorney. The letters put them on notice that Steve Broadbent, Waverly Settles, Rebecca Keel, and Naomi Fudge had committed crimes and that I needed to present those crimes to the Grand Jury. In the letter, I stated that failure to do so would be, in my opinion, a violation of the law. No one did a ting, so I figure that gives me 100 counts of accessory-after-the-fact or 100 counts of theft of mail.
DeleteNO ONE DID A TING?? Cuz they don't give a TING about YOU
YES Anon, he has given many people cause to sue him. How many of them have done so? Even if they do, he can simply default. I assume he is judgment proof. He is therefore effectively immune from a civil claim and too bad for anyone that is his victim. People that don't intend to have any assets in their name for the rest of their lives have this perk.
DeleteThe question is, if you violate his rights in return will he sue YOU. And there is no defense called, "he did it to me first". Maybe, depending on the claim, you could get in the evidence of what he did to you, but it's not an absolute defense.
This area of law is a mess. It was a mess before the Net and the problem has been magnified many times by the Net. There are thousands of victims with no recourse. No one is bothering to do anything about it.
If a powerful person becomes a victim, he might find some recourse, legal or not!
Recently a man was sentenced to five years in jail in Indiana, for putting up a site bashing a judge, just like Windsor has done. Instead of suing the offender for the appropriate claim of defamation, the judge had him charged under Indiana's criminal intimidation statute. The state carefully ignored a key element of the statute in order to make it fit the situation. The appellate court affirmed and now the case is on it's way to the state Supreme Court. But in the meantime, the guy is IN JAIL for his blog.
A regular victim of such a site would have been told her only remedy is civil. And if the defendant is judgment proof, she actually has no remedy at all. :(
@ Anon: HE attacked several individuals and WE have the right to fight back.
DeleteYou sure do. But he has an invisible shield around him, protecting him from suit. If you don't have that same shield, make sure you know the difference between your right to freedom of speech and his right to protection from malicious activity.
Ever hear the saying that the "wheels of justice are slow"? Surely you don't think that all of his victims are done with him? I know I am not. He can continue and bully/harass and declare himself King of the world while behind the scenes of fakebook and the internet, you know the REAL world, the gears are moving, trust that. All of his victims are still coming to light. You think there will be no recourse? That nobody is doing anything? That's because you don't have a dog in my fight and I will be damned if one old man is going to take me and other victims down.
Delete@V. Applause applause... Pie boy is the dog crap on the bottom of my shoes. Screw him and his lies. If he comes after me he will regret it.
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering who Susan is?? An attorney?? Making inquiries about billy? I don't trustanyone anymore, so ya know.
INVISIBLE SHIELD? What?? You're so concerned and it's really troubling since you say one thing on one page and another you change gears. You think that he's untouchable? Based upon WHAT?
DeleteI was referring to the likelihood that he is judgment proof. He is shielded by the fact that it is impractical for anyone to sue him. Even if you sue him pro se, the majority of the work falls on the plaintiff, so it's a lot of work. If he's judgment proof he can simply ignore the suit, let you get a judgment, and then what? If there were a way to collect a judgment against him, he wouldn't still owe someone else over $75,000.
DeleteSo what would be the point of seeking civil recourse?
If you need further explanation please ask.
Btw, Anon, if you think I contradicted myself somewhere please point it out.
DeleteMaybe you think I am "changing gears" because I am trying to warn all of you?
Look, I detest the guy. I very much want to see him exposed and I love the fact that this site is here.
What I don't want, is to see HIM turn around and hurt one of you back.
Sorry V, that last post was in response to something you wrote.
ReplyDeleteFYI I wonder who all of you are too, lol.
During my 15 years of experience with Internet forums I’ve learned the following:
Take everyone at face value. If they are not who they claim to be and they have some negative agenda, they are going to be disappointed. They will not be able to mislead me because I don’t act upon any information unless I’ve checked it out. I certainly don’t give any sensitive information to anyone unless they have earned my trust, which is extremely difficult to do.
Paranoia leads to a lot of time consuming efforts to research people. In the end, one is bound to make at least a few mistakes which lead to injustice against innocents. It is never worth the trouble to concern myself with who is who.
Fifteen years?? Pffffffft. Whatever. Sure there is no defense he did this first and I did that. You see the point is this is NO LONGER a civil matter, it's CRIMINAL, savvy??
DeleteHE POSTED PERSONAL INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET (we have the screen shots and I'm sure the FBI can retrieve data from his computers etc.) of the evidence in which he posted women who are protected under their state confidentialty laws. WRONG MOVE.
You may want to look back on this blog into the Joey years in regards to fraudulently using personal information. You don't have ONE clue what's going on here and perhaps it's a good thing. I don't know you and you don't know me. But rest assured the cards are falling and as we speak the wheels of justice are coming for billy. WE ARE THE VICTIMS. WE DID NOTHING TO WARRANT HIS ATTENTION. GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL
no one is going to get anything out of Bill by suing him, I think most of us get that. We have been dealing with Joey for years on here and he operated with the same immunity.
DeleteNow you assume since we are anonymous that we would have a negative agenda. Yeah, I can see your suspicions, but what you don't seem to appreciate is the extra layer of protection it provides us from someone like Bill.
Even if he wanted to sue me, for instance he is going to have to be able to subpoena my service provider to get my info, and to get them to give up that info you are going to have to have some pretty good proof of your accusation. And you know what? He still isn't there yet, he only knows where the computer was but can't prove who was on it. So, while I appreciate what you are saying and yes everyone needs to know they are responsible for what they say, I don't think you quite appreciate our little operation over here.
V, I never meant to imply no one had criminal recourse against Windsor. I thought I made it pretty clear I was referring to civil claims. If not I'm sorry.
DeleteI have extensive experience in procedure and law for unmasking posters. If you've been down this road before then you know what to expect too.
I know you have some very savvy tech people here, and if you have covered your tracks well enough you may very well be safe enough to do as you please without fear of reprisal.
Of course I don't appreciate your operation! I have no idea what you are doing behind the scenes.
Look, I see that people here believe they are invincible. So be it. MAYBE you are.
I've made my point and will rest my case on this matter, lol.
I don't understand this part though: Now you assume since we are anonymous that we would have a negative agenda.
DeleteI make NO assumptions about any of you. I've been in Internet forums since 1998...you learn very quickly not to make assumptions.
I'm not worried about ANY reprisal whatsoever. I have done nothing wrong. If pointing out lies about someone will cause a reprisal then truly you are still on a Kool Aid hangover. I hope it will pass soon.
Deletelol Susan is trying to sound intelligent but I don't see any details, just fluff. If she was so tech savy, she would have been able to quickly figure out Ginger did not start the Slanderella FB. She also would have been able to obtain Gingers' email because it's all over this blog instead of trying to send "GS" a letter tonight.
DeleteYeah something isn't sitting quite right with your expertise.
Hang on there Anon. If I said you have no recourse anywhere, I misspoke. What I mean is you have no practical recourse.
ReplyDelete"You think there will be no recourse? That nobody is doing anything? That's because you don't have a dog in my fight and I will be damned if one old man is going to take me and other victims down."
Obviously I have no idea if anyone is doing anything behind the scenes and I didn't claim to know. Don't get mad at me because I am trying to warn all of you to watch your asses! It's not my fault that the law is screwed up!
Oh trust that this is going to get better tomorrow. I don't need to travel to a police department to file charges. He's made enough enemies in Georgia that are more than willing to accomodate.
DeleteI feel like I'm playing tag you are it all over this post trying to answer you....anyway no, we are not invincible. I hope no one on here thinks that.
DeleteBut, in terms of Billy boy I feel extremely confident...not just because of his past history, but mainly because he is a grade A dumb ass. There is a reason he can't ever win in court, he is stupid. So even if I somehow end up there, I think I know how it will end.
If I were dealing with a smart, competent, balanced individual you can bet your ass I would be extremely cautious about what I say, but I've got pegged pretty well.
Right on GS! IF we were dealing with a smart, competent, balanced individual. Just wait until what tomorrow may bring for the liar, con, fraud, delusion person who's lost his mind. As a victim of family courts I know my way around. The Feds didn't take Capone down for being a mobster ROFLMAO. If BW WAS smart he'd book it to Costa Rica real quick like. But sit back and relax because guess who's back? Back again, shady's back, tell a friend LOL and no not that Slimmy, I'm the OG Slim Shady. I GOT THIS.
DeleteHEY V!!!!!! You left out us guys with tiny little hands and feet.. (I'm told that's code for I have a small pe pe btw). Oh and don't forget all my killing tools..... Can't forget those...
ReplyDeleteWho is a public figure?
DeleteA public figure is someone who has actively sought, in a given matter of public interest, to influence the resolution of the matter. In addition to the obvious public figures—a government employee, a senator, a presidential candidate—someone may be a limited-purpose public figure. A limited-purpose public figure is one who (a) voluntarily participates in a discussion about a public controversy, and (b) has access to the media to get his or her own view across. One can also be an involuntary limited-purpose public figure—for example, an air traffic controller on duty at time of fatal crash was held to be an involuntary, limited-purpose public figure, due to his role in a major public occurrence.
Examples of public figures:
A former city attorney and an attorney for a corporation organized to recall members of city counsel
A psychologist who conducted "nude marathon" group therapy
A land developer seeking public approval for housing near a toxic chemical plant
Members of an activist group who spoke with reporters at public events
https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
NOT WORRIED ONE F***KING BIT
Not one UNTRUE or FALSE statement has been made against HIM. ALL HIS WORDS, POSTS ETC.
DeleteMaking fun of a bully to my knowledge is still "legal". He's done far worse than what I and others have been accused of. Of course we don't trust anyone here. This is a blog that highlights the lowlife and his lies. PIES AND LIES should be his new tag line.
I don't get where you think what has been said about him could be construed as some horrific crime.
I've not seen or heard anyone here bring up Windsor's non-MOM case: Jorgensen v. Round America LLC et al
ReplyDeleteWindsor prevailed in a Summary Judgment because the claims were time-barred, but the case shows just how vindictive "The Piehole" can be.
http://www.plainsite.org/flashlight/case.html?id=43488
I've seen that. I just wish there was more information on it.
DeleteFunny how Bill claims it was his son's company. (he also claims to have owned 75%) He also claims that he just happened to be visiting the office that day when the MoM negotiation and started it so he kept handling it . . like just through a few emails. . . . and yet, here he is in multiple court cases regarding it & later trying to get the contract to run boat at the falls himself.
What additional info do you need about the Jorgensen case?
DeleteAm I missing something? What were Jorgenson's claims? I just see the motions filed.
DeleteThank you that was a treat. Yet another example of William M. Windsor thinking he is untouchable. An incredible example of how little he cares about anyone else's rights. It seems he enjoys aggravating people simply because he believes he can.
DeleteAlthough the plaintiff probably spent some money on an atty, Windsor did too.
OReader see Doc. 5
Deleteol Susan is trying to sound intelligent but I don't see any details, just fluff. If she was so tech savy, she would have been able to quickly figure out Ginger did not start the Slanderella FB. She also would have been able to obtain Gingers' email because it's all over this blog instead of trying to send "GS" a letter tonight.
DeleteYeah something isn't sitting quite right with your expertise.
*trying to send "GS" a letter tonight to the Slanderella FB.
DeleteOReader,
DeleteOn the plainsite.org page...you do know the Adobe PDF icons on the left margin are links to the PDFs, right?
I knew I was missing something. I totally overlooked the pdf links! Thanks.
DeleteAnon@9:11 I'm not sure what issue you have with Susan's advice here. IMHO, she's trying to alert us to the simple fact Mr. Windsor should be considered "armed and dangerous" when it comes to litigating, and I think the advice is sound and should be heeded. I've tried to read everything Windsor has filed in the courts, and frankly, both tone and the volume of the litigation is simply gobsmacking. Again, I agree with Susan--not since the days of the Colossus of Rhodes has the world seen this size of a$$hole!
DeleteWow. Sweet little round grandpa, indeed.
Delete@Sluggo, I didn't even notice the pdf icons, I'm gonna pretend they failed to load because I was on my mobile phone the first time I looked.
Delete