Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Bill's Trial By Facebook gets Stayed


Since he can't seem to get anywhere in court, Bill has decided to try his case on his facebook account as he libels and defames all kinds of people he doesn't know, and and they don't know him either.  Not only is his lawsuit against Facebook not going too well, now his trial by facebook has been suspended as he is locked out of his account. Yep, he did it again, he violated the rules and now he can't post anything for 30 days. This must be some kind of violation of his Constitutional rights.

Where will he go to stalk and harass people if he can't post it on the internet?  Will this bring about a new lawsuit against Facebook?  Will his victims find out about his defamation of them?  Is it time to pretend he is getting that skull surgery he has been threatening?  Is there even anyone left that will follow him?

65 comments:

  1. oh no, that's so sad, how is he going to be able to let people know he is sueing them, will he post to his .com or .org? will he work on his domain names? or youtube channel?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see a domain williammwindsor.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Is there even anyone left that will follow him?"

    Silly question. Marty Prehn, with or without any communication.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. AHhahahaha Hahahahaha
      Great one!

      Delete
  5. What happened with the dismissal in Missouri?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Susan, where ever you are. I bet you can't help bills account being suspended on fb. It was a matter of time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sean, don't bother Snooozan,...she's out feeding her flying monkeys.

      Delete
    2. "The loss of posting rights on FB is just not a big deal."

      It is when you've neglected your flagship site (lawlessamerica.com) to the point where it's nearly unusable.

      Delete
    3. Seriously? Dozens of ways? No Facebook? Fine...he'll just have to go back to his old favorite medium--writing on restroom walls.

      BTW, Billy claims he has US Press Association credentials, yet his name is not in their database. Go figure,

      Delete
    4. List of denials? Do you mean this list?
      Motion Hearing Held
      Plaintiff appears in person, pro se. Defendant, Allie Overstreet, appears in person and by attorney Matthew O'Connor. Non-Party deponent, Casey Hargrove, appears by attorney Joseph Gall whose Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena is taken up and granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Mental Exam and for Production of Existing Mental Examinations and the Motions for Contempt and Sanctions against Sean and Wynette Boushie are passed at his request. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery relating to taking the deposition of defendant, Allie Overstreet, is granted; as to other requests, the motion is continued. Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing by Telephone is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt and for Sanctions against defendant Allie Overstreet and Matthew O'Connor are denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is denied. Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt and for Sanctions for Frivolous Notice of Removal are denied. Plaintiff's Second and Third Requests for Production of Documents are denied.
      Scheduled For: 04/22/2014; 9:00 AM ; DENNIS ALLEN ROLF; Lafayette

      Delete
    5. where does he deny it?

      Delete
    6. Ohh. Sorry Camel Toe. He must have them set to lemmings only so we can't read them. Those are only for you idiots that actually believe him. Maybe after his suspension is over he'll make it viewable to the public so we can discuss it.

      Delete
    7. Not much there to discuss. Same old Billshit.

      Delete
    8. I decided I'll play along for one more comment. I deny ever saying anything about Bill Windsor or Lawless America. I have never posted on this or any other blog. These statements are just as believable as the the ones you posted above.

      Delete
    9. Bill loves to drive, like with that Round America thing in that white Porsche years ago sampling pies.

      Same thing now, just minus Barbara, but with the added lawsuits component. I wonder if he'll post pictures of all the courthouses he's visited on his blog? We need to have someone jump into this fray from ME and AK to keep Bill on the road.

      Delete
  7. Susan can you list what has been said here that you believe is baseless? i do know for a fact he listed his wife as the director when he started the corporation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fleming...don't ask her anything. She doesn't seem to "get it." She's just like he is. Semantics, word playing- hypocrites. She'd be better off posting on his FB page while he is in a "time out." Those are the only people who don't research anything spewed out by fellow lemmings.

      It matters not to a lemming, if you have real evidence to refute them, it only matters what they can twist and manipulate to distract from reality.

      Delete
  8. Windsor seemed subdued today. Odd, but nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably just exhausted.

      Delete
    2. Wait for it....

      Delete
    3. Ms. Overstreet -- if the publicly-available Missouri docket for the case is accurate, the court has ordered you to appear for a deposition in the case filed against you by Mr. Windsor.

      Did the judge have any comments on that motion or his efforts to take the deposition last July? Do you have any thoughts or comments on the motion being granted?

      Delete
    4. Windsor has been granted my depo for months. No idea why he continues to ask for things he already has. No, I don't have anything to say here about the judges comments or court day, other than it was a good day and Windsor seemed less stalkerish than usual. I was not chased down with cameras after court.

      Delete
    5. it only seems fair that O'Connor should get a shot a Big Vexi in the hot seat as well. I'd pay money to see that

      Delete
    6. Matt is pretty used to Windsor.

      Delete
  9. In other news: NLA's hearing/court take over in Greene Co has been postponed indefinitely. Their writ of prohibition was kicked out of court on technicality. They are working to come up with Plan C and will file a writ of error.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, they are aborting plan B?
      Ironic.

      Delete
    2. Hey, it's OK - with the failure of Plan B, they have another judge to indict.

      Delete
  10. Mr Windsor is getting a lobotomy today, okay that he wishful thinking

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What are you 5?
      Go cry to someone who cares.

      Delete
    2. lol I'm not sure who's a bigger toddler, it's a toss up between you or Windsor. Have fun, at least you have something to pass the time.

      Delete
    3. Btw, on the off chance you win a judgement when hell freezes over, Texas is a debtor friendly state (as solid as Florida). You cannot place a lien on a homestead, nor garnishee wages nor home contents, nor cars or jewelry or art, even if in the millions. Check the laws Webb before you shoot your mouth off. No one gives a shit. About the only thing you can do is attempt to seize a bank account but that too is an uphill road if others know what to do. Good luck in your new hobby, I'm proud you found something to do with your retirement!

      Off you go little butt-hurt man.

      Delete
    4. Dang, forgot one thing. Depositions go both ways and from what's been shared by several people in your real world there's a lot of skeletons in your closet. No, it has nothing to do with the choice of who you love. I for one would absolute enjoy having lawyers depose you :)

      Feel free to have the last word. I know you won't sleep it off until that happens.

      Delete
    5. LOL inheritances? Ok then. Are you planning on killing my father because he isn't even as old as you so I assume that's not happening any time soon.

      Delete
    6. "anyone who thinks they can call me names". Yeah there's our David, he can call names but others can't. ROFLMFAO

      Delete
    7. What about lotto winnings or major real estate holdings in numbered umbrella companies with no names attached? Retirement funds are also untouchable, ask OJ Simpson.

      I guess you haven't thought this all the way through or spoke with a lawyer before you spewed your crybaby crap on here.

      Best go ask Windsor for advice. I hear he's a paralegal or sumthin'.

      Delete
    8. Glad to hear you are already willing to be deposed, this could be fun fun fun. Fool. Idiot. Ooops I fergots, you're the only one that can call names. Sorry

      Delete
    9. David, you're back I see, trying to scare people with you're silly legal actions. Wanna sue me about wishing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome on you on an earlier blog?

      Going on about lawsuits, are you sure you aren't Bill?

      Delete
    10. You are boring me. I'm leaving now, have a good sleep David.

      Delete
    11. Once I've had my coffee tomorrow am, I'll revisit this blog and tear you to pieces. Let me do some digging on the Dallas Voice.

      Delete
    12. @ Pepe, there is a young man in his mid 30's you should speak with. No not Joey Dauben, someone else in David's past. He has quite the story but we can't discuss on here.

      Delete
    13. You should sue Google for the IP's connected to the bloggers here so you can prove who said what.

      Wait.
      Slaps forehead.
      Margetis and Bill tried that and failed.
      Shucks.

      Delete

    14. Now there you go accusing me of something I didn't do. How dare you. I never said involved did I? Interesting choice of words.

      No I am not lying, he's a real person who's discussed you in great detail along with about 5 others in your real world. If he's fabricating the details the issue is with him, not me.

      I wish you luck in your success in the courts and fantasies of collecting civil judgements. It's time well wasted. Yay for David!

      Delete
    15. Shit, I don't have kids. Could I will it to my hamster assuming my cat doesn't kill the hamster. Is that legal?

      Delete
  12. Better hurry David! You only have 1 year from the time of alleged defamation to file in Texas. That means if you filed tomorrow, the only stuff you could use in your mental case is April 25, 2013. Anything prior to that is not allowable in court.

    You mentioned the other night how this was a tiny little nothing blog no one reads so I can't imagine how anyone's words here has caused you 1 shred of "harm" in your real world. That's the hurdle you need to achieve with the judge is proving actual harm to you in some manner.

    You're also a limited public figure and most comments regarding opinion about yourself have been directly due to your own articles you wrote. People are entitled to be inflamed and outraged by the things you wrote as a journalist whether you like it or not. Hope that helps and have a nice day :)

    http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CP/htm/CP.16.htm

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meant civil case, not mental case. Freudian slip I suppose.

      Delete
  13. David is spooked again, deleted all his posts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is it you? (scent of a stinker...I kid...I kid).
      Seriously, too bad we can't get Snoozan to be a self-deleter.

      Delete
  14. He could come here with all you losers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3:14 trying to knock people down is cute.

      Delete
    2. Here's how I see it. The only pitiful losers around are the likes of that Margetis dude, Windsor the waddling whiney ass and now Webb's joined the pussy club. Y'all don't want to sue because of any actual harm that's come to you in your real life due to things stated on a blog, you want to sue because your feelings are hurt. Nothing more.

      Time to put on some big boy pants and go do something productive in life. If I believe something or someone online is a slimy ass or conman, I'll speak my mind.

      Delete
    3. 10-4 4:10...I think you've nailed it. What's truly bizarre is Bill has yet to figure out he won't be able to recover from his alleged emotional distress because he's a limited purpose public figure. On the other hand, the folks whom he has harassed and cyberstalked by purchasing the domains of their names WILL have intentional infliction of emotional distress as a legitimate cause of action as they are private persons. Note, a private person MUST volunteer to be in the public--they can't be pulled into "the vortex" as Windsor seems to believe.

      Delete
    4. "I won't both explaining it to you" [sic]

      Ya Sharon V., stick with that logic...you can't explain it because you obviously have way too much trouble with the English language.

      Now FO, TROLL!

      Delete
    5. I hate having to be rude to people, but sometimes it's necessary. There are certain individuals who continue to come here as trespassers without the permission of Gingersnap its owner, and without any good or useful purpose in mind. They're here only to produce heat and no light whatsoever. IMO, that sort of trollish behavior is reprehensible and despicable, and I very much appreciate admin taking the necessary and proactive steps to stop it.

      Delete
  15. This is what pisses me off with David, he hits and runs, posts a lot of shit, gets hit for it, he deletes all of it, then reappears for another round. 50 First Dates, extended troll edition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Webb needs this blog or he wouldn't get his fill of self-imposed victimhood and have an opportunity to bawl his eyes out when he provokes others and starts shit. He lives in a world where nothing he does is his fault, pretty much like Windsor.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. You were absolutely serious last night with your pouting but made to look the fool you are. Pathetic loser begging for attention.

      Thanks for trying to pretend otherwise. Off you go now.

      Delete
    4. David, how about you go pull your own chain? Enjoy yourself, somewhere else...

      Delete
    5. yeah I deleted Webb's posts from the other night. I told him he could come back if he would refrain from the late night bitch fits.....he didn't

      Delete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete