Saturday, March 2, 2013

Clubhouse Radio Tommorow Night at 7:30 central time

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/joeyisalittlekid/2013/03/04/was-it-something-we-said

The show will mostly be dedicated to the victims of Lawless America as there seems to be quite a few at those point.  So everyone is encouraged to call in. 

Until then, everyone needs to make sure and check out my girl Allie's post on the LA board while its still up.

https://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica/posts/268712469929718

206 comments:

  1. http://www.blogtalkradio.com/joeyisalittlekid/2013/03/04/was-it-something-we-said

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh no, another 'hater'........

    Jenna Felicity
    Bill Windsor is despicable and places children in danger.
    Like · · 16 minutes ago

    ReplyDelete
  3. Allie posted this today on LA.com, under Bill's post that he's filing criminal complaints on 37 people for cyber stalking.

    Allie Overstreet 2013-03-02 14:56
    Why is it, that not one person you say you file complaints and charges against, has ever been served with any? You are adding people who merely asked you questions, with people who libeled you. And to be clear, itit's only libel if it's done maliciously while knowing it's false. Good luck showing libel when what I write is the absolute truth. Countless unaltered emails sit in my inbox showing the opposite of what you say, as well as real life witnesses of your lies. Patiently awaiting my papers Bill. Filing complaints, suing, and crying, when people say mean (and true) things about you in defense of your outrageous lies and exaggerations, only makes you look stupid and costs people time.You in fact, are more of a liar, slanderer, libeler, and stalker, than the folks on your list. Priorities and perspective have eluded you, and I look forward to your mysterious fake charges.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool, I didn't see this.

      He doesn't seem to be monitoring the comments. He never (or rarely) addresses any post asking for help. He only seems to pay attention to his posts and the comments on them. So sad.

      I hope Allie can find a sympathetic ear in court on Monday, who will actually hear what she has to say, and weigh her testimony fairly. Bill caused her much more problems than she already had.

      Delete
    2. I like this post. She's right about the fake charges. It's far too suspicious that Bill's hard drive conveniently died the day after his TRO and charges.

      I'm going to play devils advocate for a second. I disagree with Allie ranting on Billy the Bully right now PRIOR to her hearing. Of course Bill is going to take this and beat her into the ground with it. AND Knowing first hand information, Bill HAS contacted some of the fathers of the moms he previously filmed. What if he's handing over lie after lie to Allie's ex? She should have set her anger and pain aside until after the hearing and zipped it.

      This will all but guarantee her losing whatever is left of her rights. This FB rant would not have accomplished anything in a court of law, it wouldn't sway anyone one way or the other. I wish things would work out differently next week for Allie but I fear her goose is cooked and its her child that will pay the ULTIMATE price. There's nothing ok with that no matter how you slice it.

      And Bill is a ruthless heartless pile of scum. He won't give her baby a second thought.

      Delete
    3. My heart breaks for Allie.
      There are no words fitting for the absolute disgust & rage I have toward Windsor.

      Delete
    4. Let me amend my previous comment, my heart hurts not only for Allie, but the other Moms, Dads & families that have been victimized by Windsor. Allie's is the most recent I am aware of...I realized after I posted, there are many. It is truly overwhelmingly heartbreaking...

      I'm sorry for these individuals. Sincerely. I've made poor choices, lots of them...who hasn't?

      Delete
    5. Allie also brought up a point I don't think we have explored enough in terms of the current followers, that being that they might not leave out of absolute fear about what Bill will do to them if they do leave. Fear and intimidation are the preferred tools of a dictator, and they can be very effective for a while. That's until the word starts getting out which it seems to be now

      Delete
    6. @ Ninja: yeah, it's really sad that Bill does not respond to posts asking for help. But, he sure jumps all over the 'hater' comments with the C&D responses - I've seen a bunch of those lately.

      @ Gingersnap: I agree - I haven't even been able to process that yet. The LA people with family court/kid issues are at huge risk if they leave. I noticed the 'hater' that posted after Allie appears to have an association through WTP, Bill can't do much to hurt her.

      Delete
    7. @NBTDT shows what his true agenda is doesn't it. Heartless prick.

      I agree with Ginger too. The fear aspect of leaving. But, perhaps if enough people join together and leave at once, and ask for their videos to be removed, he won't say anything publically. It wouldn't look good for that many to bail for his ego. And no one would believe they are all haters. That story is played out.

      Delete
    8. @ Ninja - I think you are right. The only out they have is to wait and leave in mass. The only problem is those videos. What to do, what to do......they've all signed releases.

      Delete
    9. My question is have you taken your case and evidence which is good so you say and spoken to the elected Sheriff or the prosecutor both elected officials and gave them the "bill windsor special" ultimatum. Investigate or we will get you voted out. Charge you for treason or whatever. What is the scoop there. I hope you know this will also take affect on your waiting 3 months in the beginning of the case.

      Delete
    10. Ya, I thought about that. Maybe "@Attorney" has some ideas about that to share.

      Delete
    11. Every one filmed by Bill for his phony baloney movie and 'revolution' should ban as one and file a class action suit and file for damages. Bill Windsor and His Lawless America fraud needs to be stopped and exposed before more victims face the harsh reality of political retaliation they are and will most likely continue to permanately be now that we/our names are known to the Corrupt Politicians who do have the power to destroy and discredit, just as Bill Windsor has to himself, our individual and collective testimonies that are now being stored as evidence by Bill Windsor himself, in addition to countless enemies, using all as ammunition for their own ( the government ) continued attacks. I try to distance myself fro m all of this for my own sanity, I have always despised this type of nonsense- I am grateful for an honest forum of truth tellers and seekers who can continue to help support and unravel the Bill Windsor drama and trauma that a whole bunch of 'nobodies' fell victim to. Thanks All! As far as these insults, accusations, harsh critical judgement, etc. flying between and around the David Webb drama- take it outside- as my own Father used to say to my 5 older brothers if and when they were to get into one of many arguments that could and would easily erupt into fist fights. one of the reasons i don't participate in blogs, and already spend to much time alone on face book. take care all. as far as BW- he is reaping what he has sewn. all the victims will see truth, victory and justice- by God!

      Delete
    12. I think you are right Mary, Bill would be a classic case of a class action law suit. I think the only question is are there any real assets left that someone could get out of him to offset the legal expenses involved in perusing it? I really don't know the answer to that.

      Delete
    13. That is indeed a humdinger of a comment thread. Surprising that Windsor hasn't deleted it.

      Okay, now for the legal stuff--and please note that though I am an attorney, you should certainly NOT construe what I'm about to say as legal advice to you. Please consult your own attorney before taking any legal action.

      I don't know nearly enough about the contract (or release or whatever) that LA subjects have signed with Windsor to be able to say what legal action they could take against him. If they believe that he's violated the terms of the contract (someone—Susan?—suggested he had), perhaps they've got a claim for breach.

      Anyone considering taking such a step should realize, of course, that litigating against Bill Windsor can be an endless and seriously painful process. Just ask the poor folks at Maid of the Mist, who have beaten him repeatedly in court and yet are out tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of dollars for their troubles.

      As for a class action, that would require a case in which the number of plaintiffs is truly huge. (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23 , states that class actions are permitted "only if... the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable." States' rules on class action tend to be very similar to that.) If the number of plaintiffs is manageable (five? ten?), then a class action is probably not going to fly.

      The big question, again, is what's the cause of action. Subjects who think Windsor has materially harmed them should consult their own counsel and see what he/she thinks.

      Delete
    14. Exactly MaryB!!!
      I have a 'friend' that specializes in class action suits! *slaps forehead* WHY didn't I think of this?
      Thanks MaryB~ I'll let you know....
      I'm calling friend now & have 'friend' go read for a few hours & tell me if that's something that y'all can do!! & friend would do this pro bono, I'm almost positive~
      You are so freaking smart!!!

      Luff to you~MaryB~

      Delete
    15. Thank you @Attorney~ My friend is on a trip to see new grandbaby in Hawaii & I didn't leave a mssge...
      Thank you for the above~

      Delete
    16. @ Attorney: sorry that I overlooked these comments earlier. A copy of the release is posted on www.lawlessamerica.com, there is a link on the right side of the home page.

      What's bothersome is that in his response to the Lemmings that are speaking up today he threatens to use the information he has in his possession against the Lemmings to help their adversaries. Scary. Especially for those in custody battles.

      Delete
    17. @ Attorney: One thing I've recently learned in initiating an action against a crazy person is that you can pretty much count on a cross action without basis, out of nowhere. If the group did organize to file a class action suit, how would Bill's status as vexatious litigant effect his ability to file a counter suit?

      Also, don't there have to be damages? What are the damages? If someone loses child custody or visitation rights, isn't there a valid argument that the person did that to themselves?

      (Moms - don't blast me, I'm not blaming you or excusing Bill, just asking a question. In TX there you have to show damages in civil action)

      Delete
    18. @Attorney: I think when people speak of a class action, they really just mean they should all join as plaintiffs. Willy is judgment proof, so the action would be pointless.

      If they wanted to, I think everyone could join to seek injunctions against him using their videos. I think though that even those that have seen the light, still want their videos used in the "movie".

      If someone really wants to try to do something, I would suggest they contact the prosecutor's office in Marietta. Explain what Willy is doing and ask them if they can offer any help at all. I don't think he has done anything that will qualify as criminal, but courts don't let that stop them when they really want to burn someone. It's worth a phone call to find out if the prosecutor's office has any interest in dealing with this clown.

      Delete
    19. What movie? And, what happened to your support of Bill and your position that what Bill is doing is protected under the 1st amendment?

      Delete
    20. @NBTDT: We all know there is no movie. That is why I put the word in quotes.

      Seriously? You are under the impression I support Windbag? Why do you keep accusing me of things that have no basis in fact? Do you just make this stuff up for fun?

      He has a First Amendment right to protest...doesn't he?

      The point of my post above was that if people no longer want him to have the use of their videos, they can obtain relief through the courts. Really NBTDT, if you have read any of my posts, you will see that I have constantly tried to make people aware of their RIGHTS and their RESPONSIBILITIES under the law.

      I have repeatedly stated that I want to see Willy shut down I have repeatedly condemned him as the liar he is. I have said many, many critical things about him.
      But as soon as I recognize that as horrible he is he still has rights, and I caution people not to take the rope he is giving them to hang themselves, the less intelligent readers see red! Suddenly what I said was, "I LOVE Willy!" I've never seen so many people so blinded by emotion.


      Delete
    21. Emotion? From me? You are in the wrong pew.

      Oh, that's right, I remember now. You came here telling us how ignorant and uneducated we are regarding laws and rights. Good thing too. Yeah, because we didn't know any of that before you got here.

      So, I'm guessing the comments I recall that were supportive of Bill were for my "education". Got it.

      Delete
    22. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    23. Did I say YOU were emotional? No, I did not.

      Actually NBTDT, I think the one post that really caught my attention as clearly inviting a civil suit, was written by you. It was that post that caused me to write what I thought was a private message to Ginger.

      It is VERY clear that you don't know enough about intentional torts to keep yourselves out of trouble here. The fact that you are so sure of yourselves, says a lot about how little you know. This class of law is known for the fact that it is VERY ambiguous. No one that understands this field would ever be so confident about the kind of posts you all write here. The fact is that most judges and very few juries are NOT able to grasp the fine lines that separate free speech from a tort. Often it is anyone's guess as to the outcome of such a tort. It is nowhere near as simple and clear cut as the people here seem to believe.

      Any comments reminding people that Willy has rights were directed at whoever it was that seemed to think he does not. If you were one of those people, then yes, I would have attempted to educate you.

      Delete
    24. No, again - you are clearly mistaken. It wasn't me that posted the comment that drew your attention. And, lets see - you were the rocket scientist that couldn't figure out how to get a private message to Gingersnap, so you sent a message willy-nilly without knowing who was going to get it on the other end.

      Last time I checked, which was just a few minutes ago - we didn't ask for, nor do we need a legal babysitter. For the record, I'm betting I've forgotten more about preparing, trying and testifying as an expert witness in civil cases than you will ever know in your life time. So, please forgive me if I don't appreciate or welcome any additional "education" coming from your direction.

      Delete
    25. Um, how do you know which comment drew my attention? I have never identified it, because I didn't want to give Willy any ideas.

      The private message to Ginger did not include state secrets. I would have posted it here, except again, I didn't want to give Willy any ideas. So it really was not a big deal if the wrong person received it. Unfortunately the topic became a public one, because the recipient of the private email addressed to someone else, posted it here.

      I never attempted to educate YOU directly therefore I didn't need your invitation. I think it was your post that got my attention, but my warning was general in nature. Maybe YOU know exactly what you are doing but I'm sure you will agree there are many others that do NOT.

      It seems to me one of the people here has already been sued and it wasn't pleasant. Perhaps she could have benefited from some of your extensive knowledge. While you may not feel the need to share, is it ok with you if I do try to help people protect themselves from Willy?

      Delete
    26. Um, because I know it wasn't me and I know you are trying to deflect to make yourself look better. I think your "willingness" to share is all self motivated, as is everything you post. And, no it's not OK with me for you to decide unilaterally that someone needs your "protection", especially in public.

      I will not discuss this issue further.

      Delete
    27. OH, I do hope I get my "Served"! I will enjoy the taking to task Bill Windsor! I will enjoy taking him off his high horse and taking one of the two million dollar homes he has away from him. I will enjoy watching him squirm in a Missouri or Texas Court while his defense has a hard time justifying his fraud against me.
      Please for the love of God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit Billy file your charges! My lawers are standing by at the rate of 500 Dollars an hour.

      Delete
    28. ugh, i will put suing bill and lawless on my 'to sue list', ha ha. bye guys, i have some real legit pro se legal shit to do- keep an eye on my public face book notes, public and the Meet Me on Clearview, my home, the state wants to force a sale by august 24, ironically but i don't believe a coincidence- my birthday. take care, good luck picking up what ever shattered pieces are left of billy boy's train wreck! any EMT's out there? God, I hope so!

      Delete
  4. yappyMarch 1, 2013 at 1:35 PM
    Well I guess Susan must enjoy siding with Webb. A man who believes children are at fault for their own rape and NOT the predator.


    David WebbMarch 2, 2013 at 9:20 PM
    This is the reason I have to keep monitoring this site when I would really prefer to never look at it again. It is because of idiotic statements by Yappy that unfairly and falsely accuse me of stuff like this. I don't believe children are to blame for their molestation. That is an insane interpretation of something I wrote. I do believe parents are responsible for making sure their children are safe in bed before they retire for the night themselves and that alcohol causes people to do things they otherwise might not do. The prisons are full of people who committed crimes when they were under the influence of alcohol and drugs. Ask any prosecutor or police officer what role alcohol and drugs has to play in the commission of crimes, and you will hear that it is an enormous factor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Yappy. You are the sick one. You are an abusive woman who got the previous blog shut down by your hate speech directed at me. You admitted it when the new blog was launched in one of your comments apologizing to Ginger Snap. I know far more about these issues than you realize as my entire body of work over more than three decades shows. You are an egotistical, hateful woman who forms decisions based on emotion rather than logic. Joey is to blame for what happened. I made that clear in what I wrote, but I also wanted the column to be a warning to parents and teenagers to be aware of the dangers that could await them at the unlikeliest of moments. Why aren't you interested in messages of prevention instead of focusing merely on blame and punishment?

      Delete
    2. What's more, if anyone sounds drunk, it's you not me with this exchange. I am not drunk, and I am not an alcoholic. That is yet another lie you have spread about me.

      Delete
    3. Hey Webb: I agree with this "I do believe parents are responsible for making sure their children are safe in bed before they retire for the night themselves". Most responsible parents will agree with you on that point.

      Alcohol was a factor only to the extent that Joey used it as a tool to "have his way" with the boy.

      Delete
    4. NBTDT: I think there are some people who would do as you suggest, and that is to use alcohol to coerce someone into sex. I also think there are other people who undergo extreme personality changes under the influence of alcohol, and that Joey is possibly one of those people. That is not to say that he didn't have a predisposition to this behavior, which I alluded into my comment that he claimed to have been sexually abused by other boys and an older person when he was of pre-puberty age. No one else came forward to complain about Joey having molested them when there was massive publicity about the crime, he had a history of dating women, I never detected anything at all about him that would indicate he was interested in males of any age and he told me that he quit drinking about a year ago because he was concerned it was a problem for him. Everything I am writing now came from an on-the-record talk with Joey after his conviction in the courtroom (which people apparently saw and led people to think something other than a professional conversation was going on). I don't believe Joey is some sort of monster, but I do believe he suffers from some problems that are actually an epidemic in this country, not a rare occurrence. The bottom line is that he is paying the price of his crime with up to 30 years of his life now. I think that is enough, and that Yappy has no business continuing this bullshit.

      Delete
    5. Yappy: Your rage and your comments speak for themselves. I can't imagine who you think you know that would know me well enough to know how much I drink, but I doubt that someone like you would know anyone who is in my inner circle. This is just more Yappy bullshit.

      Delete
    6. Yappy: You have serious emotional and psychological problems. You really should get help.

      Delete
    7. Yappy: You are truly crazy. None, absolutely none of the things you are saying about me are true. People who truly know me well have a far different opinion of me than you are expressing. I do have a private life, but there is absolutely nothing extraordinary or unusual about it.

      Delete
    8. Well, sense we are going to go there....

      Yes, some people do have personality changes when they drink too much - but we're talking about going from non violent to violent or from polite to antagonistic and foul mouthed. I've never seen anybody change sexual orientation when they drink too much. There are like 4 other problems with your evaluation:

      1) Joey hung out with several gay men and men that like teen boys. It's very rare for a straight man to have a relationship with a gay man, it's way odd for a straight man to have several relationships with gay men and men that like boys.

      2) Dating females - so what? How many of those relationships were sexual? How many were to cover up for or to run from being gay? Look at Elton John, he got married before he came out of the closet. And, I've thought all along that Joey could be bi-sexual. I've never bought into that, "you're either gay, straight or lying" thing.

      3) I know somebody that was close to Joey and one of his sisters since Joey was in the 6th grade. All of what I said in #2 is supported by what that person saw in Joey while they were growing up.

      4) I don't believe this was Joey's first experience with a boy. There are lots of reasons why others have not or could not come forward. None of the boys Messiener enticed came forward either. I think Joey was hiding his attraction to boys from everybody, even you, because he knew it was wrong.

      I'm afraid to ask, but too curious not to - what epidemic?

      "he suffers from some problems that are actually an epidemic in this country, not a rare occurrence"

      Delete
    9. Well, OK, I'm glad we are going to discuss it. I think it is better to hash things out than to wonder. I have several straight male friends of like four decades. In fact, I have more straight male friends of that duration than gay ones because so many of my gay friends died of AIDS. I have never known anyone who liked to hang out with teenagers, and I have never done that myself. I believe that would be wrong unless it was in a non-sexual relationship and only as a role of a mentor. It's hard for me to really comprehend because I am from an age when no one came out until they were of legal age. I understand now that teenagers come out as gay and lesbian, but I am not that advanced in regard to that thought. I personally would not want to be involved with it because it just seems to foreign of an idea to me. I tend to believe people when they tell me they are straight or that they are gay. They know better than me. To tell you the truth, my gaydar doesn't work anymore. I never know whether someone who is younger than me is gay or straight. It seems like the standards that I used to judge that by have changed. The epidemic that I mentioned is in regard to an investigative story I did a couple of years ago for the Dallas Voice about all of the young males underage on the streets involved in prostitution. Also, I did a story about a 19-year-old who had been on the streets since he was like 15 as a male prostitute. There is an epidemic of young people both male and female teenagers selling their bodies on the street in major urban areas. That certainly includes Dallas.

      Delete
    10. Yappy: I just sent you a letter of cease and desist via the e-mail address that I understand reaches you. I hope that you will take my request seriously.

      Delete
    11. Yappy: So now you are threatening me with physical violence by the "big boys" as well. OK. Thanks for the warning, and it will be pretty clear for whom authorities should search if something happens to me.

      Delete
    12. BTW, I can't wait to be sued from here to eternity in light of all of the derogatory remarks that have been made about me.

      Delete
    13. Yappy: As you have indicated the e-mail address I have for you is not accurate, let's make it clear here. I am respectfully asking you to cease and desist in making derogatory remarks about me about me that are untrue and malicious. Too bad we have to make is so public.

      Delete
    14. Holy crap Mr. Webb, you are causing someone to have a complete meltdown. And yet, I don't see you saying anything to her other than, "leave me alone please".

      A C & D has the same value no matter how it was sent. It's not a COURT ORDER C & D, it's just one person giving another notice that they want something to stop.

      And continuing to speak to someone on the net after they have asked you to stop, is not stalking or harassment. If someone does not want to hear from another person, they should not READ the unwanted posts. How hard is that?

      Who are the big boys and what do they do?

      Getting sued from here to eternity sounds pretty unpleasant. I wonder what court has jurisdiction over here to eternity? What is the filing fee for a suit of that magnitude? Is the judge here, or in eternity? Can witnesses be compelled to appear in eternity? This is an interesting concept. I'll have to do some pondering.

      Delete
    15. OMG, the police are coming for you Mr. Webb! Run, ruuuuuuuuun!

      Delete
    16. OK, Yappy: You have scared me to death. I will say no more. But why don't you shut up too?

      Delete
    17. Do rape victims get put in some kind of special protected class? Someone seems to think so.

      If a rape victim can dish it out, shouldn't she be able to take it? Playing the rape victim card is pretty ridiculous. I've met very few people that haven't had their share of trauma in life. Do traumatized people get a free pass when they are mean to others? Why wouldn't people respond in kind?

      And once again, WHO started this incident tonight Mr. Webb? I could swear you were not even here, and someone had a need to bring up your name and make a derogatory comment about you. Then when you post to defend yourself, you are the evil one. Someone has a very, very distorted idea of what is fair.

      Delete
    18. I would have never said a thing had Yappy not made that derogatory remark about me. I have devoted a large part of my professional life to advocating for people who have suffered abuse and oppression for multiple causes, and it infuriates me that someone is so unjustly accusing me of such apathy.

      Delete
    19. yappy please contact me attorney104@gmail.com

      Delete
    20. @Mr. Webb: Some people don't seem to understand that when they throw the first punch THEY OWN the consequences of that action.

      I'd love to have heard that police call. "Hello, 911? I constantly post nasty things about people on the Internet. Tonight when I said something nasty about a person, he showed up and confronted me about it! I keep telling him to shut up and he just won't do it.

      I want this dealt with immediately...I AM A RAPE VICTIM, so I am more of a victim than a regular victim. What? Yes, I am perfectly serious. What do you mean am I off my rocker? Yes I DO expect you to do something about this! Aren't you the big guys? Isn't this what you are for?

      What do you mean it's a civil matter? I am being stalked, harassed, hit below the belt, and repeatedly insulted! Oh, oh wait, never mind, an anonymous person on line that claims to be an attorney is asking me to contact him! I'll get HIM to help me. Maybe HE is a big guy!"

      Delete
    21. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    22. Susan: you need to STFU. You have no idea of the history or what's going on. Stay out of it.

      Delete
    23. NBTDT: I read your comment before you removed it. I don't know why you removed it. I liked it.

      Delete
    24. And wow, I just read NBTDT's comment to Susan. Now, you are sounding pretty wacky. This must be a site for maniacs.

      Delete
    25. @ Webb: there's a story there too. Trust me.

      Delete
    26. All I want is for people to quit accusing me of these horrendous, false allegations.

      Delete
    27. @Nbwhatever: Do you SERIOUSLY think that post to me will lead to the result you seek? You have not been paying attention at all if you do.

      There is no "story" with me. And I couldn't care less about Mr. Webb's history. The fact is, a mouthy individual deliberately and without any provocation, made a nasty statement about me and Mr. Webb. The individual clearly wanted our attention and she got it. It seems to me that you are the one with no place in the conversation.

      Delete
    28. You are right, I should have realized by now you have absolutely no idea when it is appropriate to shut your mouth. And there is a story, you just don't know it because you haven't been paying attention.

      You are making this about you and Webb but you are sooooo out of your wheelhouse. If you are so worried about what yappy said, did you take it up with her when she said it? If not, it wasn't that important then, was it. If so, it's over - move on.

      You are stepping off into something you have no clue about. Just leave it alone and stay out of it, it is none of your business. And if yappy is too mouthy for your taste, there are plenty of other blogs in the sea.....

      Delete
    29. In an open forum people can say what they want. It's ludicrous for you to be dictating what is appropriate. You obviously are all crazy.

      Delete
    30. @nbwhatever: Pfffffttt! It seems to me that many people here, you included, do not know when to shut their mouths.

      I just watched someone do to Mr. Webb, exactly what she has been doing to me for weeks. I get the impression she loves to get some drama going. I don't care WHY she was doing it to Mr. Webb. She was looking for a fight and she got one. Though I must say, she went a tad berserk and her main opponent was herself!

      I see the meltdown has been erased. I'm glad I have it in my email, because it was quite revealing. One minute "her meltedness" was LOLing, the next minute she was claiming to be in fear, suffering emotional pain, and frantically dialing the big guy po po.

      Pulling the rape card was really special. Who does that? WHO in her right mind, thinks she can dish it out and then refuse to take it because she was raped???

      Delete
    31. I erased her comments because I am beyond sick and tired of the topic. And nothing would please me more than to expunge yours from it as well so don't feed my urge.

      Yappy can get emotional, especially about certain topics. That shouldn't be a news flash to anyone on here. But the part you don't get is that Webby loves coming on here and picking a fight with her. In fact this fight was started because of Webby responding to something she said over a day ago on another post. So in terms of tonight, he came on here looking for a fight with yappy and he started it. If he wanted to simply respond to what she said several topics down, he could have kept it there, but no he choose to bring it over to this new post so he could be the center of attention which is all he wants.

      Delete
    32. @ Susan: Please pay close attention to what Gingersnap wrote. This goes back a lot further than a day, longer than before you ever heard of this blog. The comments I deleted weren't even relative to the fight. But, this is something between yappy & Webb, my comments were out of place. So yes, I do know exactly when to shut my mouth. I was trying to get you to shut yours because you engaged in hurting someone on a level so deep you can never understand it.

      Delete
    33. @Ginger: You've got the delete and ban buttons. You will use them as you see fit. You recognize that Mr. Webb came here to address something YAPPY SAID right? It's very easy to say you believe in free speech, it is quite another to live with that policy isn't it?

      @NBTDT: Every word of your 9:50 am post states the obvious. I didn't have to witness the entire relationship between two others to know there is a history and very deep feelings on both sides.

      The question is, why should I care about how deeply someone is hurt, when I see that person spend her days here attacking others with complete abandon? When has this person ever held her tongue in recognition of the fact that she doesn't really know the person she is attacking, she doesn't know how deeply she might be hurting them, and clearly, she DOES NOT CARE.

      This individual attacks me almost daily here, even though I have not addressed her in quite a while. She joins in ruthless condemnation of others whenever it suits her. If she is such a fragile creature, she needs to recognize her limitations and refrain from deliberating provoking others.

      If you want to protect your friend, teach her THAT. Teach her that people who live in glass houses should not throw rocks. Don't expect anyone to tolerate her abuse without giving it back to her.

      I appreciate your thoughtful post, but what you are suggesting is unreasonable in light of your friend's behavior.

      Delete
    34. the problem is he came here as in this current post where we are talking about the radio show tomorrow night and the current statement by Allie O. If he wants to keep arguing with yappy at least go back to the old post that contains the statement he wants to whine about, don't bring it into all of this where no one cares.

      I know you have tons of unsolicited opinions you will no doubt be giving us. But this Webb thing goes back to the Joey Dauben situation and I don't believe in beating dead horses. Everyone has had their say in that, many times over, all opinions are clearly stated and now its time to move on

      Delete
    35. I hear you. But you do recognize that it was Yappy that threw the first punch which led to last night's fight don't you?

      If you want to move on, shouldn't you ask EVERYONE to stop reopening the old wound?

      Delete
    36. @ Susan: So, even though it was obvious to you that there is a history that you know nothing about, when Webb drew blood, you smelled it and moved in for the kill. That speaks volumes of your character that you would deliberately hurt someone in that manner.

      yappy has not attacked you personally. yappy has taken exception to your tone, your statements, your insistence that we are incorrect when we are correct and pointing out the obvious. Just as we all have. yappy is just more outspoken about it than some of us. Take it or leave it, your choice. We will stand beside yappy no matter what and we are all staying right here.

      You and Webb seem to be the only people that have an issue with yappy. Maybe this should be cause for you to reflect on and change your presentation. Maybe if you can figure out how and why you are irritating to the discussion, yappy will have no reason to take exception to what you post.

      Delete
    37. @NBTDT: I didn't get involved because of the history, I got involved in spite of it. You are correct...I DO NOT CARE how much I hurt someone that spends most of her time here attempting to hurt others.

      I didn't attack Yappy "personally". I merely responded to the preposterous ideas she advanced in HER posts. Yappy has not attacked me personally? You must not have seen the posts where she sets forth her professional "diagnosis" of my "personality disorders", LMAO. Get real, she has taken her best shots at hurting me! I consider the source and find it more amusing than anything else, but make no mistake, she TRIES to hurt me and many others.

      YOU are surprised that I would deliberately hurt someone? The main purpose of this entire blog is to hurt people. There seems to be no limit to how far the people here go either. There are no rules of engagement here. EVERYTHING is fair game.

      People here regularly attack the physical appearances of others, while keeping their own images well hidden. That's a fair practice right? The odds are that many of the people here that make fun of Willy's weight, are fatter than he is. Using information found on a very personal website against a person (re. WC Fields) is, in my opinion, hitting very far below the belt. Then there are all the harsh criticisms of Willy's followers. People that are unsophisticated enough to believe in Willy, belittled and insulted for being gullible.

      I'm just following the lead of the regulars here. All rules of civility have been set aside by many, but not all here. Yappy is among the many and she is treated in kind.


      Delete
    38. @Ginger, "I know you have tons of unsolicited opinions you will no doubt be giving us." BINGO!

      @Susan,
      1)"Oh, oh wait, never mind, an anonymous person on line that claims to be an attorney is asking me to contact him! I'll get HIM to help me."

      Umm, Anon 12:24 OBVIOUSLY did not "claim" to be an attorney but maybe the "I am an attorney" statement in that post is hidden from the rest of us. Ever heard of someone making an email address with any name you want? However, if you can make that ASSumption, then I guess I could make the ASSumption that you are an attorney and that you are trying to provide Allie legal advise with this post..... "Susan Harbison Allie, if you haven't received your free DVD of the movie, Willie is in breach of contract and the release you gave him is void. You can get an injunction to stop him from using your videos. Contact me at sbharbison and that is at gmail"

      2)"I just watched someone do to Mr. Webb, exactly what she has been doing to me for weeks."

      Well let's see here... I have made more direct statements to you than "she" and yet you don't come after me... interesting. Why is that Suzy? I tell you all the time that you are a dipshit (not in so many words, I thought it was OBVIOUS). Why do you feel the need to pick on "she"? Where are the posts that say "@Susan" from "she"? If you find HER posts so insulting... wait.. what was that you said... "If someone does not want to hear from another person, they should not READ the unwanted posts. How hard is that?"
      See that's what I do with you most of the time until I find that you have been a dipshit again. Then I just can't help myself but to remind you how much of a dipshit you are.

      Seriously Susan, what is your hang up with "she"? See here, I'm not talking about Yappy as "she". (I am asking you why you feel the need to pick on women, just in case that was not OBVIOUS)
      Do you lack the self confidence to address a man?
      Do you lack the self confidence to "attack" anyone on your own?
      Why hide behind Webby? (Too bad you're a girl because I think you and Webby could have a beautiful future together. You seem like a great pair)

      Now, grow some nuts or STFU (wait let me spell it out for you just in case it isn't OBVIOUS, S.H.U.T T.H.E. F.U.C.K U.P.)
      If you would like to address ME now, I'd be more than happy to explain the OBVIOUS to you once more. I promise I won't call for backup.

      Oh and you can even put copies in your email just so you don't forget what a dipshit you are.

      I hope that helps.

      Delete
    39. Other than making a comment that someone looks crazy and/or dangerous my opinion, I have never made a comment about anybody's appearance. I certainly have never made fun of Bill's size, nor have I supported or joined in with those that have. Just because others might hit below the belt does not make it right for any one else to follow suit. Again, the fact that you would follow that example and use other's short comings as an excuse for your behavior speaks to your lack of good character.

      As far as laughing at gullible people, have you ever watched TV? How about Betty White's 'Off Their Rockers". How about Kimmel? Kimmel has a regular piece that they do where they ask people questions about something that hasn't happened, like an election. The answers are hilarious. Bill's gullible people are hilarious too. You must think it's funny too or you wouldn't be logged on. Seems like a double standard for you to complain but laugh along with us.

      That's it. I'm done. You can talk and talk and talk all you want. I will not waste another moment to consider anything you have to say. You are way too "educated", "sophisticated", verbose and arrogant for my tastes.

      Delete
    40. I didn't accuse YOU of hitting below the belt. My point was, that it is standard procedure for many people here, yet you are asking me why *I* would do it. I don't see you weighing in on that practice when others do it.

      I do believe that anyone that thinks it's ok to hit below the belt, must accept that the same lack of civility will apply when someone hits them.

      I have NEVER used anyone's short comings as an "excuse" for my behavior. I'm just saying that if they don't want any rules of engagement, I can accept that.

      The way people here (not ALL people) talk about Willy's followers is entirely different than the examples you gave. There is nothing funny about desperate people being taken in by a con man. I have not laughed along with any such "comedy" here.

      Delete
    41. ^5 NBTDT - you make me happy because you said it all for me...

      Susan, you do not seem happy when here, which begs the question why are you here?

      Delete
    42. It's OBVIOUS, Susan is here because she feels that she needs an ego boost from people that she feels are weak.

      Wait..that sounds familiar...

      Delete
    43. @Oceans: What makes you think I am unhappy? I am having a ball, lol.

      Delete
    44. OK AS THE MINISTER OF ALCOHOL ON THIS BLOG I NOW DECLARE ALL COMMUNICATIONS MENTIONING ALCOHOL OR ITS EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN PSYCHE OFF LIMITS!
      @yappy sorry but you cant mention Mr. Webbs affinity for wine. Even if he needs cheese with it.
      @Mr. Webb, Yes many on here like to drink while they read. I am sure that you partake just before or during your reading of this blog and its comments.
      Fact is I can and will drink both of you under a table and any Aircraft Carrier in the Navy's fleet!
      I am tired of both of you feeding off each others need for attention. Yes yappy starts many discussions on this blog with you Mr. Webb. But instead of taking it with a grain of salt you launch into these all out assaults on her character which causes her to react in kind.
      I hope not to offend either of you but I must say enough is indeed enough!
      Curtis Butler Alcoholic At Large

      Delete
    45. Should I ask if you wash that mouth out before you kiss your mother Anon 1215?

      Delete
  5. Yes, I'm sitting on this - waiting to see how long it takes Bill to find it and I want to see the comments before he does find it. Poor Mary D, here she goes again, I hate laugh in middle of Allie's pain but this is funny, I don't care who you are.....

    Mary Deneen Judges who Kidnap Children and "Blatantly-Ignore" PROOF in Medical Records of Child Abuse and Neglect w Extortion are NOT Honorable Judges (PERIOD). How, When, Where, Why MISSOULA, MONTANA Mark Supinach alleged (False, Fictitious, Fraud) Statements "Eating a Balogna Sandwich" - seemingly, rises to the level of an 'Oscar Meyer' Westside Story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stuck on bologna I see? Yes its all about the bologna Mary Deen. smh how silly

      Where is the accountability that Bill should have never posted that childs (fake) death and his pics in the first place? Nah, it's fine, he gets a pass on his behavior but how dare some Mark in MT make a sandwich error.

      Delete
    2. Mary is a nugget of the greatest proportions, nearing those of Gail from the truckstop wifi...
      Together? those 2? a dangerous duo....information & the internet combined with their interpretations are just painful to read. I'm thankful they are on Bill island. and Julia. Gesh. Pass the Tylenol.

      Delete
    3. Mary just keeps posting the same thing instigating Bill to file all those charges against Mark and Allie. She is a broken record and it's old. I think those are the only codes she knows.

      Mary is a nugget alright. The kind dung beetles like.

      Delete
    4. Too funny! Mary is a nugget alright. The kind dung beetles like.

      Delete
    5. Mary D. was on the database of people I contacted for RSVP's for D.C. She never contacted me back which is interesting because she and I had a conversation on fb and it was her idea that we should all bring teddy bears. I was never sure of her game but to hear you speak of her now I have to wonder if she is a fake profile. If she feels so strongly about Bill then why wouldn't she contact me with an RSVP one way or another?

      Delete
    6. She's not a fake person. But, I have no idea of whether the profile is fake. She' not right in the head, I've read the court docs.

      Delete
    7. have to agree with NBTDT- Mary D is really not okay. And she has done some really scary things.

      The thought of her and Gail S together scares me silly. :(

      Delete
  6. Here we go. The Latest from Michigan Lawless Page, the post here about this child here https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=551152188251904&set=a.129227510444376.13601.100000713843805 there is now an amber alert.http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/03/02/alert-issued-for-missing-illinois-baby/

    My question once again. Why are you running and not calling the police on the day care center. Sure CPS wants to see the child and so do the police. Is it wrong that both agencies want to see the child? So let's say that the police check out the child and when in the home they see other suspicious crap then they ask the parent to get their act together to meet the "best interests of the child" is that fair or not? Should once CPS are involved for whatever reason should they make the parents live up to some standard which happens to be the same standard that we ask of ourselves in Child custody disputes in everyday court?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ Sean: The news report makes it sound like the day care center called CPS, CPS took him to the hospital. The dad took him from the hospital and ran. I'm with you, seems to me if the day care had done it, first call would have been to the cops. Why would CPS need to be involved?

      Delete
    2. The running part seems very suspicious.

      Delete
  7. @yappy. Spiritual vampires love to suck your positive energy to replace their darkness. Sending you some positive energy. Breathe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is Yappy okay? I <3 her so I will send her my happy thoughts too.

      Delete
    2. Yappy is ok. She is preparing for the show tonight.

      Delete
  8. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=422286844530116&set=a.400685030023631.95215.399427630149371&type=1&theater

    Love you Yaps

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bill found Allie's post. I didn't see Susan's name on the criminal list before now. Is he just making up the list as he goes? Looks to me like Susan as added because she posted response to Allie.

    Lawless America CEASE AND DESIST, Allie Overstreet, Kimberly Eigglesworth. Jenna Catherine Reboli, Susan Harbison, Petunia Snodgrass, and Albert Fiorini. You have been warned before yet you continue your lies, libel, defamation, and stalking. Criminal charges have already been filed against Allie Overstreet, Kimberly Wigglesworth, and Petunia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, never mind - I see, Susan is getting the customary C&D demand.

      Delete
    2. I just bill have it. LOL I don't think he will come back with his normal C&D to me lOL. We will see

      Delete
    3. LOL Sean, he probably won't respond with any intelligent statements. He doesn't have any, that's why he always says the same thing. C&D to all. I can't offer any proof of why I say it, but I don't have to, I am Bill Whinesor.

      Delete
  10. Dang, Bill is taking an all out Lemming assault. They're on to him:

    David Graham No one is harassing you Bill. We are " responding" to what " you" have done to Allie by exploiting her, falsely accusing her, and putting her daughter in worse danger. Do we not have a right to protest you ? Do we not have a right to speak against the false allegations made of Allie? Do we not have a right to appeal to you for the sake of a child who is paying the price for the words you have said? If not, how do you represent America in any way? All I see is you threatening people when they speak up to you. If people speak up to you you threaten to sue them and exploit them on your front page as news? Can't you see what you are doing is hurting children who are exploited and in danger and not helping them? It was you Bill who caused this public event, not Allie.I watched it unfold myself. Allie was put in a position of defending herself to MORE false allegations. And now she is paying the price for helping you with lawless and paying a price for every word you have spoken. Her daughter is the one who pays the highest price for this " episode" of lawless America. Maybe if you cease and desist from attacking people and exploiting them in public then these situations wouldn't even exist. Take a deep breath Bill and really think about what you are doing to very real people. I have heard you speak in your own words saying that you are not a people person and should not be dealing with people. Maybe you should really take notice of that. You were right. But to continue in these things is no more a mistake, it's a willful choice. I do hope you will take the high road as a human being and not the low road which is fueled by vengeful emotion. Real people , and children, are paying high prices Bill and are being put further in danger because of your methods of practice. This disgraceful situation needs to come to a halt and for the right reason, the children. Or does that not matter to you? People make mistakes Bill but it seems you are making willful choices. Today is a new day and I hope you decide to do the right thing.
    5 hours ago

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, he's got a whole new list of people he needs to silence before too many lemmings start jumping ship too. He really messed up with this charade.

      Delete
  11. Hi everyone, this is Joe, Yappy's husband. I have rarely posted and have just sat back and watched the blog unfold. However, I feel it necessary for me to chime in and say a few things about my wife.

    Yappy has the biggest heart in the world, a very caring and giving spirit. A beautiful, sensitive woman. A woman who has experienced a lot of hurt in her life and still seems to find the good in the world.

    She had a horrific childhood, a childhood that she wants to make sure no other child experiences. In that, she has been a rock and a gentle hug for our children. She is the ultimate mother bear and if anyone would dare attempt to hurt our children she would be the first one out of the gate. And she not only gives her all to our children, she is always on the look out for children who are being hurt and she is the first one to step in.

    She has a tender heart that goes out of her way to sit dowand talk to a homeless man, addressing him with respect and compassion, asking him how and what she could do to help him get off the streets and back on his feet.

    She is the caring person that thinks of the smallest things that mean the biggest thing to a person in their time of need. A gift that says you are not alone, kind words of support and compassion, a loving smile, an act of kindness.

    She is the woman who stands up for what is right in the face of criticism and attacks from others never giving in to what she feels is wrong.

    She is the wife who gives all she has and more. She is the wife that stands beside her husband in the face of whatever comes their way. Unconditional love that is always there. The best wife in the world.

    For those people out there who see her has only Yappy and choose to see her vocal posts as attacks, I can only say, sit back and read again. Yappy is there to support the victims, side with the good, support the hurt, expose those who choose to hurt others.

    Yet there are those people out there who think it is right to attack people like Yappy and poke and make fun or ridicule the abuse she and others have experienced. Attack the victims of crime somehow making it their fault that they were abused. Use people for their own agenda with no thought of what they are doing to others. Hide behind a mask and lie and scam people. Make excuses for their behavior and not claim responsibility for their actions.

    Well, Yappy for one, and there are others on this blog as well, who will not stand for this crap.

    I know who Yappy is and I feel very blessed that she is my wife, the mother of our children. She is the best friend anyone could ever hope for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beautiful stated Joe. We love Yappy!!

      Delete
    2. @ Joe: please pass along my XXXXX, OOOOO & (((((hugs))))) to yappy.

      Delete
    3. Hi Joe! *waves*
      Thank you for sharing! You are an awesome man to stand up for your wife in that way and be there for her! We love your wife dearly and I am happy to call her friend.
      I concur with Ninja!

      We love you Yappy!

      Delete
    4. Thanks Joe.

      Yappy wears her emotions on her heart. And she personally gets involved with a lot of these heartbreaking cases out of the goodness in her own heart.

      But by wearing her heart on her sleeve, she invites trolls like Webby who know exactly what button's to push with her and draw her into an emotionally laced fight. I don't know if Webb intentionally tries to remind her of her own scars in her life, but there is absolutely no doubt that every time he comes here he is looking for her and trying to push her buttons so he can feel better about himself.

      Delete
    5. Yappy made the following statement about Mr. Webb: "A man who believes children are at fault for their own rape and NOT the predator."

      Mr. Webb's first post to Yappy last night, simply defended against that statement. He very calmly explained how he feels about certain crimes, to correct what Yappy said about him. There was no "button pushing" in the original rebuttal to Yappy's statement. And there was no mention at any point, of Yappy's personal issues until she started screaming about them!





      Delete
    6. GS: You are mistaken. I noticed last night for the first time the most recent comment Yappy had made about me. I came on specifically to ask her to cease and desist with the disparaging remarks she makes about me on a regular basis. She makes false and malicious remarks about me that are hurtful to me and injurious to my reputation. I frankly was stunned by her meltdown. I am accustomed to criticism about my writing, but I am tired of the personal attacks on my character. I am hopeful that they will now stop, and it will not be necessary for me to defend myself in the future.

      Delete
    7. @David...I still don't see the part where I was mistaken. I said my main problem was that you brought the fight, which of course is a carry over from like 4 others, from one blog post on to this current one that did not contain the statement yappy made and the subject matter has nothing to do with you. This was a form of thread-jacking.

      @Susan, thanks for the history lesson but I'm more than aware of who said what and when (not to mention where). I also know the long history behind it and leading up to it (which you clearly don't). But here's a solution. Webby has his blog The Rare reporter and he is desperate for someone to comment over there. How about you and him go over there and just have it out about what you and he thinks of us. I won't C&D you guys, you can go do whatever you want over there. Everyone could be happy then.

      Delete
    8. You are mistaken in your belief that I wanted to upset Yappy. My only purpose was to get her to quit making malicious, false statements about me. I wanted to make sure she saw what I had to say.

      Delete
    9. @ Gingersnap: Ditto. Good idea for Susan and Webb have a yappy party somewhere else. Like Mary B said, take it outside.

      Delete
    10. You cant get anyone to quit doing anything. This is a major flaw you and bill share. If you want to file charges against her for having an opinion, well go do it. I'm sure she would be more than happy to show all the things you have said about her. But you can't stop someone from having free speech just because you don't like it.

      I would like for you to be the bigger person and just let it go, but that's clearly never an option in your case.

      Delete
    11. You are right. I can only explain how I really feel and make a request, which I did. Unfortunately, that caused her to go berserk. I don't have anything against Yappy. I spoke with her on the phone one night for 90 minutes when she called me. I thought after that she understood me better and that I had made peace with her. Then she resumed the attacks. I don't get it. She is the one with a grudge against me. But I'm through trying to reason with her after what transpired last night.

      Delete
    12. So can we leave it at that? I will delete any unsolicited attacks from her to you as long as you don't start any, either over here or with what you publish on your blog?

      Delete
    13. Absolutely. That's the end of it. I just want peace. And I would appreciate that very much.

      Delete
    14. @ Webb: thank you.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86_4BesaOVc

      Delete
  12. @David Webb, I wanted to know why your not working for a normal paper. I see that most of the articles you refer to are written at some second hand forum a blog or some comment section of the news or something else that is not a true News site. I note here that you've wrote about people's personal disputes and made them into so called news articles as if they are big news. I can say that most people are not reading them and dont care. isn't there any other news you could be covering than a blog on the internet? Just saying? Why don't you freelance for some major place. Here is the deal being a reporter who makes articles out of comment sections and blog comments is great news isnt?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So he covers the issues of LGBT's and the guy who is wanting to sue you all on here for stating he is gay when he says he is not because he hung out alot with a gay dude who raped a young boy. I got it now. Well still, in my opinion would not write stories on what happens in comment blogs etc. It becaomes less news and more gossip

      Delete
    2. Oh, Sean. LOL. There's too much history to explain. Short of it: Webb is openly gay. As a reporter, he had a mentor/friendship with a blogger/reporter wannabe named Joey before his arrest. Joey was convicted of raping a boy, Webb covered the story. We've had some periodic, on-going discussions/disagreements regarding Webb's choice in words. Webb isn't going to sue us. He and yappy don't like each other. Webb comes here once in a while to pick a fight with yappy. End of story.

      Delete
  13. Ok, so I decided to post this to Lawless:

    LordBrannon Bridgeposted toLawless America
    2 seconds ago
    Mr. Windsor, I hearby order you to Cease and Desist from using the phrase "Cease and Desist" I have "little c" that phrase and also puttin a TM on it, this phrase is now mine, and you must Cease and Desist from using that phrase thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is loosing likes fast soon he will be back to the 6,000 he first had.

      Delete
    2. Brannon, I have never ever loved you more than I do right at this very moment. (((HUGS)))
      c
      TM
      c
      TM
      c
      TM

      giggle giggle snort snort~

      Delete
    3. @Brannon: Now THAT is funny, lmao!

      Delete
    4. I'll share you with those Puffer chicks, but you'll always be my morph, even if you never win a Shake Dance award! (but you will win them all, suit & tassels above the competitors)

      Delete
  14. schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 2:18 PM

    @David I have seen, Yappy said sorry to you if she cross aline....and really feel bad for doing it ....But I have never seen your ideas grow, and it is little sexist because most of what you support is because the victim is a boy..... If the victim of Joey was a girl....I do not think you would be so mad at her, or warring with Yappy.

    @Susan this is your ego, I know you are mad at her, for not trusting you, but she had the right not to trust you

    @Susan, NBTD and Sean, your comment have made me change my name for you.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well change it back, that's NOT a good name.

      Delete
    2. schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM

      @NBTD I know you love Sheldon, and this is why I feel it fit you perfect to the logic that you force on other people....

      http://youtu.be/HCOE__N6v4o

      but you seen to hate women, that do not think all could be a rapist or abusier in some way, it is perfect for the judgement you and Sean feel they have the right to put on me.....

      http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/

      Delete
    3. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. If you don't like my opinion or that I stand my ground, please don't hesitate to skip my comments. Won't hurt my feelings at all.

      Are you saying that you think I hate women? I don't know who you are, so what judgement do you think I've made?

      Is it a full moon?

      Delete
    4. schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 3:23 PM

      No, I am not saying you hate women, I am saying you see the world very black and white... and mostly with a culture Eye that said men need to be excuse for all their crimes against women, and you seem to blame women for all the culture traps that in the end forces women to make bad choices.... instead of understanding were those choice come from...


      Delete
    5. You seem to not get the point that S.R. I believe me and NBTDT have which is we know there are abusers and rapists out there. But, seriously I believe that there is a responsibility for a person man or woman not to put themselves in danger in the first place. So don't date criminals with crappy histories. I also suggest if there is a crime don't wait to report it no matter how much your hurt or in Denial. Time of report means a lot in a criminal case of he said she said. Also the number of people within the anti-CPS family rights and the Domestic Violence movement seem to put the cases out there but yet they seem to sometimes not be taking the cases up with law enforcement and or if the LE are not investigating enough or whatever you need to take it up with LE not some Family Court Judge who is there to handle the disputes of your Custody not determine if one is guilty of abuse. That is what I am saying. Nobody here is denying the fact that abuse and neglect is happening at all. We just want to protect children who are having their personal lives exposed. Why don't you think that new agencies take up these stories that often. They are protecting the children from the public being all in a families business.

      Delete
    6. No. I'm sorry I've come across that way. I do not excuse men, ever, for any crime against a woman - there is never an excuse for hitting or forcing sex. And you have absolutely no idea how adamantly opposed I am to any kind of domination or sense of subservience in any relationship. I agree that there are culture traps that entice women, but they are not forced, into making bad decisions. I do understand the traps, I do understand how easy it is to fall into them and I don't fault the women that take the trap - as long as they don't complain about it.

      I don't have patience with women that do not take responsibility for their own fate, then complain about it and want somebody else to fix it. For example: meeting a guy that seems so nice, then ignoring the fact he's been married twice, hit his last girlfriend or has convictions for assault. Huge red flats that some women ignore just because they want to rely on someone else to take care of them. If they would just take responsibility for educating and supporting themselves, they can be more selective in choosing a mate. They would avoid the biggest trap of all, having kids with a sadistic, domineering jerk.

      In this society, it is no longer necessary for a girl to grow up with the expectation that she will get married right after her senior year in high school, have a bunch of babies and live happily ever after. It doesn't work that way. Our daughters should be taught to stand on their own 2 feet, they don't need a man to survive and they don't have to take any man's crap. They should marry for love and a life partnership that is equal in power.

      If your situation is one that I don't have patience for, I am sorry. But, it's not too late to break free. And, you will be sooooo glad you did.........

      Delete
    7. @ SR: Sean is right, he posted while I was thinking. If you or your child have been physically abused, for crying out loud - don't wait, call the cops. Leave and don't go back. Ever.

      Delete
  15. The Lawless America main page is rumbling with loud dissent & the brave posting away....The delete button must be malfunctioning...

    here's the latest~ I like it, too. I'm in awe of this new wave of courage among the crowd~ I hope it is contagious!

    Bill - without any vetting whatsoever, you and your volunteer (Dottie) sent me your list of "subjects" for my state (Washington State). As a long time organizer/activist who is well respected in my community by not only average-Joe/Jane citizens, but also with my local and state officials, I feel an obligation to warn everyone on your subjects list of the damage you have caused others, and to forewarn them that they, by their mere involvement with you, may (and likely will) also be harmed by you.

    The subjects list you (via Dottie) sent to me contained no instructions, no disclaimer, no notice to "not distribute or use other than intended".

    A week later Dottie then sent me a 4-page document intended for distribution to the "subjects". That document also came with no instructions, no disclaimer, no do not distribute/share notice. Again - nada.

    It was at this time that I determined that you, Dottie, and your 'organization' were far too unprofessional for me to work with--and, due the many red flags I had spent some time vetting you, and found that you were/are far from the person of moral and ethical character you tout to be.

    More than a month after receiving the two emails from Dottie, therefore a month after quietly bowing out of your circus, I received a call from someone who claimed to be your Colorado organizer who, best I could tell, was rather upset with me for not having contacted the WA State subjects. I explained to her that I was never provided instructions, and without going into details as to how unprofessional I found you and your organization to be, I told her I had quietly bowed out. Her response was something like "Great! So I already did my whole state and two other states, now I have to do Washington!" She asked me to sen her the subjects list, which I did. I never heard from her again, but I did hear from your organization again, when about a week later I was sent an email addressed to "All State Coordinators". I ignored the email, aside from pondering yet again how unprofessional and unorganized you were (and still are), which sent me on another hunt for more info on you and your background which, as you are well aware, the amount of information out there on you and your many, many outrageous antics would fill several bookshelves and then some.

    You and the actions you've chosen to take with your all-out assault on so many people have sent your even deeper into the gutter of decay, and now, due to your charade unraveling and your desperation to salvage your newest money-making endeavor, you find yourself spiraling the drain, and instead of stopping your rampage, you choose to amp it up. For this reason, I cannot in good conscience sit back and say/do nothing as you drag others down with you. These are desperate people - so desperate they reach out for anyone to help them, and because you put yourself in a position of appearing to be someone who can help, some have latched onto you and now find themselves in even more dire straights.

    You are a predator, and you prey one some of the most vulnerable among us, and I will do what I can to inform the world of the harm you have caused so many people. This is my right, and I will be exercising it freely and fluidly.

    Stacy Emerson
    Tacoma, Midland Washington

    Like ·

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stacy Emerson In my inbox was the FB notification that Julia Fletcher commented on my post, however she apparently removed it. Here it is verbatim: Julia Fletcher wrote "Whatever happened to "teamwork"? It's easy to find fault with just about anything anyone does. A project this challenging and with this much potential needs good volunteers, good help, good suggestions and many prayers. Please spend time thinking about what you can do to help."

      To answer your question Julia - I am doing things to help, just not the help you'd prefer I do which would be to align myself with Mr. Windsor and his ill-fated followers who he manipulates through fear and falsities.
      9 minutes ago · Like

      Delete
    2. FYI - I posted the same comment on the WA State LA page, and it was promptly removed. I reposted it with a note - "Seeing that the admin promptly removed my comment, I will repost it and re-screenshot it. To censor me in such a way will only provide more evidence that Mr. Windsor and/or his volunteers are engaging in an attempt to cover up the truth about LA and its self-proclaimed founder."

      I assume that it, too, will be deleted, but here's the link to the post - https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474522472612826&id=440959859302421

      Delete
    3. Lawless America STACY EMERSON, CEASE AND DESIST. THIS IS LIBEL. GET READY TO PRODUCE ALL THIS ALLEGED VETTING BECAUSE I ANTICIPATE THAT YOU WILL NEED IT IN COURT. I HAVE NEVER BEEN INVOLVED IN ANYTHING OF QUESTIONABLE MORAL OR ETHICAL BEHAVIOR. I HAVE NEVER BEEN INVOLVED IN IMPROPER OUTRAGEOUS ANTICS. I AM NOT INVOLVED IN ANY MONEY-MAKING VENTURES. I AM NOT NOW AND NEVER HAVE BEEN A PREDATOR. FREEDOM OF SPEECH REQUIRES THAT YOU SPEAK THE TRUTH. YOU ARE NOT. IF YOU CONTACT ME AGAIN OR POST ABOUT ME AGAIN, I WILL CONSIDER IT A VIOLATION OF GEORGIA'S HARASSMENT AND STALKING LAWS.
      1:57pm (a few seconds ago)

      https://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica/posts/269120789888886?comment_id=1220346&ref=notif&notif_t=feed_comment

      Delete
    4. @LIPC,

      That's just Windsor huffing and puffing. If he files or even attempts to file a civil suit against you without first vetting it though the Federal District Court, he will be in violation of Thrash's order.

      Frankly, IMHO, the order is clear; if he even attempted to file in Cobb last week, he's in violation of the order.

      Delete
    5. @Sluggo, I agree with your opinion and share it.

      Delete
    6. Great job Stacey! I quietly bowed out after the fiasco I experienced when I was supposedly the "editor" for LA. I did quite a bit of work, was never given any instruction, and then was told that my work was somehow not up to snuff. I tried to contact Bill for specifics and for what I could do--he never returned my calls, emails, etc. etc.

      Delete
    7. On the other hand, Windsor is very special; take for instance his personal calculator. It has all the standard functions save one. There's add, subtract, divide, and Bill's favorite, multipie. ;-)

      Delete
    8. Thank you, ff4ever.

      It does appear that he has removed my comment from the main LA FB wall, however the permalink still works. He also deleted the two comments which others posted in response -

      Shane Brooks wrote: "Stacy Emerson is a person with respectable qualities and integrity, a person worth listening to."

      (note - Shane and I know each other outside of LA, and as far as I know, he knows nothing about LA, but was simply stating his opinion of me personally)


      Truth about extreme Father Right’s groups wrote: "rule 16# of sundance said you have NO MOVIE.... so if their in No MOVIE then you are conning people"

      Perhaps Mr. Windsor will venture over here and read this -

      Bill- simply deleting my post and supportive comments on my post does not delete the facts. I will not sit back and do/say nothing while you cause harm to any citizens of my state--especially me. There is nothing preventing me from contacting everyone in the subjects list you/yours sent to me. I'll begin there, but not end there.

      Delete
    9. I'm so proud of all of these! This one, Allie's, MaryB, The Power Puffers, The LawlessNoMore blogger....I know there's a growing list. It takes courage to stand up to a bully.
      Good for all of y'all!
      I hope each of one y'all's situations improves....I realize each is different.

      I hate he deleted all the great posts & comments. He musta been napping or they wouldn't have stayed up so long today.

      Delete
  16. @schrodinger: Sure she had every right not to trust me. What she had no right to do, was repeatedly claim I said things I never said.

    In one day she wrote 13 rants about me and when I replied to show her how many things she had falsely stated, she chose to "walk away" rather than take responsibility. Since that day, I have not addressed her, yet she continues to make almost exclusively false statements about me.

    It's got nothing to do with ego. On another blog she saw me link to Mr. Webb's article. Instead of commenting on THAT blog, she brought her comments HERE, not simply to a different page, but to a different forum altogether! In the course of her daily efforts to attack me, she inferred that I am consorting with someone that is a mental case. I overlooked it because I consider the source. Mr. Webb chose not to overlook it and when he called her on it she started turning it all on him, as if he struck the first blow.

    It's got nothing to do with ego. I've been watching her long enough to identify her game. I don't usually care enough to bother with her but I was not going to watch her run that game on someone else. SHE was baiting both me and Mr. Webb. SHE INVITED that confrontation, plain and simple.

    I don't know what you mean about changing your name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Susan,
      "yet she continues to make almost exclusively false statements about me."
      Where? You say it as fact, prove it, because I'm going to call you a liar until you do.

      "It's got nothing to do with ego."
      It has everything to do with your ego. I am very confident in my opinion that you lack confidence in yourself. So you only "attack" people that YOU believe are weaker than you.

      "In the course of her daily efforts to attack me,"
      Again, Where? You say it as fact, prove it, because I'm going to call you a liar until you do.

      "Mr. Webb chose not to overlook it and when he called her on it she started turning it all on him, as if he struck the first blow."
      Again, it is OBVIOUS that you do not know the history behind Yappy and Webb. You have stated that you "do not care" about the history. If you do not know their history then the above statement is very ignorant, as you would have no idea who truly struck the first "blow".

      "It's got nothing to do with ego."
      That statement is redundant. So I will be redundant as well.
      It has everything to do with your ego. I am very confident in my opinion that you lack confidence in yourself. So you only "attack" people that YOU believe are weaker than you.

      "SHE INVITED that confrontation, plain and simple."
      Though Yappy may have entered into a heated discussion with Webb, she did not ever deserve to be "ganged" up on by you. Again, you have no clue as to their history. What you did was out of line, ignorant, egotistical, and just plain uncalled for. You are truly a heartless bitch.

      Delete
  17. I have also decided later that I will notify fb for copyright infringement on him using the phrase "cease and desist" by Lawless America

    ReplyDelete
  18. yappy RadioBlog reminderMarch 3, 2013 at 3:24 PM

    Reminder of the radioblog tonight at 7:30pm central time. We have it up for a 60 minute show but if few people call in, we'll wrap it up in 30 mins. Just in time to listen in to the weekly de fuhrer.

    We're hoping to hear from a couple of Bill's victims tonight. If someone wants to talk, you're welcome to leave your area code on here for me OR the last 3 digits of your phone number. This will make it easier for me to find you on the switchboard. If you are calling from a blocked number, let me know that as well and I will check those too.

    If not, we may get to enjoy more giggles from Sarah, Saul, LaQuesha or our favorite Bangladeshers.

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/joeyisalittlekid/2013/03/04/was-it-something-we-said

    ReplyDelete
  19. As W C Field's use to say, what goes around comes around.
    Bill is a total farce, that attorney in Calif made Bill fold like a cheap suit,
    See on prior.
    Bill was so stupid he put the matter on his WWW blather
    But. that attoreny represented a man.
    Bill is trying to stir up food fights, he thrives on stiring up
    strife, conflict, and he is garbage baggager.

    ReplyDelete
  20. well so Bologna Bill has deleted the remark and banned us all from commenting. It will not stop me from reading the public Comments and talking about them.

    ReplyDelete
  21. schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 4:49 PM

    @Sean... 15 min after I got home,I went to the hospital..... what should I have done, not put the coat on the baby or put him in the Car Seat....

    Sean crap (But, seriously I believe that there is a responsibility for a person man or woman not to put themselves in danger in the first place. So don't date criminals with crappy histories. I also suggest if there is a crime don't wait to report it no matter how much your hurt or in Denial.)

    Really, How many people do a Background check on people they are Dating.


    that statement is why I can said you are schrodinger Rapist,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK, so you didn't do a background check. And it's all our fault that we have an opinion that you don't like about your decision and situation.

      But, what are YOU doing NOW to help yourself and your baby?

      Delete
    2. Sounds like a feminist. Really? There are women using the vagina to control men and scam them for whater all the time. Might as well get ass raped because all they do is mess with your head and feelings and your wallet. Tell me that women aren't checking out who you are these days. Most women ask for a first and last name. Google a dude up and check court records. Just saying.

      Delete
  22. Schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 5:03 PM

    @NBTD http://www.legalmomentum.org/our-work/sfr/sex-discrimination.html

    there are culture traps that set women up for failure and even when women leave and report abuse, there is a backlash

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there is going to be backlash. Growing up is hard. It would have been just as hard if you had avoided the traps. Did you mother tell you life would be easy? If so, she lied. Get over it.

      You have to decide. Do you want to continue living this way? Or, do you want to forge through the backlash and take control of your on future.

      Delete
    2. That link is sooooo lame. Decide what you want to do, then be the best at it - good things will follow. Why let somebody else define who you are? Why can't you decide that for yourself? As long as you let people tell you what you can/can do, who you are/are not, you are doomed to stay right where you are - that is your choice. You can decide not to listen to what anybody else decides for you. That is the first step towards independence. You don't need a leader - BE THE FRIGGIN LEADER of your own life.

      But, you really, really need to be getting in touch with a support group. This is not the place to get the kind of help you need.

      Delete
  23. Schrodinger RapistMarch 3, 2013 at 5:35 PM

    wow, thats what started this all this because Sean's the Schrodinger Rapist posted he know who I am, and he agree with PIE MAN lies about me and he feel that I hate all Men because I do not feel Men should get job training and all kind of free help after they beat the crap out of a child or women.....

    ReplyDelete
  24. How many persons who post ( ed) here have;
    1) never mer Billy W in person
    2) never were filmed by him
    3) never e- Mailed him ?
    4) never been in the same state nets him.??

    I gather it is a large % of the people who post
    here ..

    Yet, has Bill smeared Brannon, and are those
    Bill actions " actionable "
    As " attorney" noted go seek your own Esq
    legal counsel..
    It seems outrageous Bill's antics toward
    Brannon..
    Just saying, some 2 cents opinion .


    ReplyDelete
  25. And and, if Brannon never met Bill , are any
    Actions actionable in Texas given Bill's WWW
    antics, and Texas 2 step
    Lone star " contacts "".
    Just saying, but as " attorney " noted
    go contact your own l atty, nothing
    on here is legal advice.
    Nothing. nada

    ReplyDelete
  26. This may be old news, but I just stumbled upon it while looking for something else-

    Faye Barnesposted toLawless America Pennsylvania
    Sunday, February 10 at 9:58am ·

    "WHY is your Mr. Windsor making threats at my daughter; Ms. Robinson???? She is ONLY trying to get justice for her daughter/my granddaughter!!! What is wrong with you people???? I thought YOUR ORGANIZATION was there to help in the fight for justice????? I must be wrong!!!"

    Lawless America Pennsylvania

    "If there is an issue with your daughter and Mr. Windsor, please take it up with him. This is for information pertaining to Lawless America for those interested in Pennsylvania. Thank you!"
    Sunday, February 10 at 5:18pm

    (https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=213150772157593&id=188973404575330)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember this post but it's all running together - from Feb '12 or '13?

      Delete
    2. The link did open, that's why I couldn't remember the year of the post at first.

      I couldn't find out what happened between Bill and Mrs. Robinson, I assumed she had received the customary C&D (TM - Brannon) from Bill for her posting on the LA page. She has a civil rights case pending re: her daughter vs a soccer team and visited DC at the same time as LA.

      Angela Pittman Robinson
      Hello Pa, i have an appt w Sen Toomeys aide tomorrow at 3pm at Hart 502. Anyone who has not met w their Senators is invited to join me. Have a blessed nite & my prayers to you & your fight!
      Like · · February 5 at 8:05pm

      Angela Pittman Robinson you must be from Pa however!
      February 5 at 8:07pm via mobile · Like

      Angela Pittman Robinson if u plan on attending, i will see u there.
      February 5 at 8:07pm via mobile · Like

      Lawless America Pennsylvania We had our group Lawless America appointment 10 of us from Pa saw Doyle, Casey, Toomey, Cartwright, Swartz, in the Senate Hart rooms . Very Good meetings then I went to all Congress from every state gave them Lawless america flyers. I WANT TO THANK ALL PA PEOPLE YOUR DEDICATION TO OUR FIGHT TO END CORRUPTION . Angela hope your meeting went well also.
      February 7 at 4:46pm via mobile · Like

      Angela Pittman Robinson Yes very well thanks. The Senators were at a charity event most of the week but im positive they are sending my dsughters case to a trial which is what we wanted. We stood out because we came ourselves & not affiliated w Lawless America & i am thankful for that.
      February 7 at 5:01pm via mobile · Like

      Angela Pittman Robinson I was made aware that not everyone from Pa had met w their Congress members & it saddens me that Lawless did not make sure that happened since they presumably care so much!
      February 7 at 5:05pm via mobile·

      Delete
    3. Good grief. So Angela arranged a meeting on her own (meaning her scheduled meeting had nothing to do with LA), yet whoever admins the LA Penn page pipes in with a comment to imply LA had something to do with the appointment Angela set with Toomey's aid, leaving Angela to reiterate that he effort was hers alone, and had nothing to do with LA.

      This kind of spinning, which is so frequently propagated by LA's ignorant-of-their-own-blindness volunteers is frustrating to say the least.

      Delete
    4. I am starting to see that the game of Semantics runs through the entire thing. I thought it was just Windsor that did that.

      Taking credit for something they had nothing to do with, or making it appear as though they did. Sad.

      Delete
  27. Replies
    1. LOL that's funny. Puke, I'm not your father should follow that pic. LOL

      Delete
    2. (I was thinkin', "Puke, I am your Bother.")

      Delete
  28. I clicked the link to the pic of the woman on Bill's lap,
    and lost the group chat. :-(

    But it was fun tonight. Thanks for another great show!! I really liked the part where Pie Boy said he didn't have a woman sitting on his lap, and then had to try explain the link proving it. Oh, but he couldn't handle the pressure so he blocked the whole thing to get rid of the evidence.

    Good times!! Fricken Awesome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had such a good time I forgot about the Bangladeshers. But now that I remember them I feel bad for not missing them. Please come back Khazi and family of 6000.

      Delete
    2. Kazi, Dali Dharma and Smeg are here sleeping on our cowMarch 3, 2013 at 11:45 PM

      we will be back

      Delete
    3. That pic of the really pretty lady sitting on his lap, it's on my FB wall.
      His hand is firmly on her tail.
      But, the photo does exist, he posted it, & it was taken from his album labeled DETROIT.

      Delete
  29. FYI - of course I was blocked from commenting on my own post on LA FB (after receiving my C&D), but I see that others can still post there:

    Redorblack Nigelbottom: "LOL, glad for Lawless America that YOU will consider it a violation... wonder how legally binding the State of Georgia considers your opinion."
    8:04pm

    Redorblack Nigelbottom: "Or how legally binding they consider a Facebook reply made about the same time you blocked the person who made it and then deleted the post... yeah, nice chain of evidence. How much did you pay Facebook to serve that notice? What is their fee for showing up in a Georgia court to testify on your benefit... Oh lordy lordy..."
    8:39pm

    Redorblack Nigelbottom: "Oh, is it one of the courts that you are fighting for court corruption in Lawless America where you plan on filing this lawsuit against all those people talking smack about you on the interwebs? Wahaahhahahahaha"
    8:41pm

    I wonder how long before Redorblack gets a C&D, then deleted and blocked.


    (permalink - https://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica/posts/269120789888886?comment_id=1221031&ref=notif&notif_t=feed_comment)

    ReplyDelete
  30. I told my two nephews about the remark that they used me for money. They thought that was pretty funny, and they said that they were concerned because of the way I go through money they would wind up having to pay my tabs in the future. That's just an illustration of how unreliable the information on blogs tends to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You agreed not to bring anything up. But you cannot help yourself we see?

      http://oi45.tinypic.com/16i75dy.jpg

      Delete
    2. read the tinypic. he is not a man of his word

      Delete
  31. LOL, some people just make stuff up and throw it out there hoping it will stick.

    Do you have any 16 year old daughters? I hear some people drag them into their net activities and put great stock in their opinions!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/26153867.jpg

      Delete
    2. http://postimage.org/image/t3wyamy5h/

      Delete
  32. I agreed not to attack Yappy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who made the comment about your nephews. If it wasn't Yappy, we'll agree you are not attempting to hurt or antagonize her.


      http://oi45.tinypic.com/16i75dy.jpg

      Delete
    2. If it was Yappy you are poking directly at her. You do not want peace, you need attention to fuel your attacks. Please leave this blog, you have no idea how unwelcome you are on here.

      Delete
    3. Yappy if you are here tonight, do not respond. He is attempting to entice you into a fight. Do not feel the vampire blood suckers.

      Delete
    4. I don't know who is spreading that rumor, and I didn't attribute it to anyone. It's simply not true, but it was posted on this blog earlier. I'm simply saying that my nephews and I think it is funny.

      Delete
    5. We love you Yappy. We Luff your guts Yappy.

      Click here yappy.

      here

      Delete
    6. Record shows yappy stated something regarding your nephew or niece so that ends it. Live up to your word, go away now!

      Delete
  33. There apparently are an incredible number of rumors that have been spread about me that are untrue. At this point, I'm not attacking anyone who reported them on this blog. I'm simply saying that they are untrue. I especially did not like one that cast members of my family in a poor light. Attacking me is one thing. Lashing out at a member of my family is another issue altogether.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What did you promise Ginger? Go away, we do not want you here.
      http://oi45.tinypic.com/16i75dy.jpg

      Delete
    2. I agree anon Mr DW is not welcome here.

      Delete
  34. Great show Brannon, Petunia and Yaps.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I didn't promise to go away. I promised not to attack Yappy, and I am not.

    ReplyDelete
  36. WE LOVE YAPPY. YOUR JOE LOVES YOU. YOUR CHILDREN LOVE YOU. YOUR FRIENDS LOVE YOU

    CLICK HERE YAPPY here

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yappy when you awake and read the blog, read Joe's blog post, by pass the meaningless. Do not let vultures, vampires or dark matter invade that huge heart.

      WE LOVE YOU! WE LOVE JOE TOO!

      JoeMarch 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM
      Hi everyone, this is Joe, Yappy's husband. I have rarely posted and have just sat back and watched the blog unfold. However, I feel it necessary for me to chime in and say a few things about my wife.

      Yappy has the biggest heart in the world, a very caring and giving spirit. A beautiful, sensitive woman. A woman who has experienced a lot of hurt in her life and still seems to find the good in the world.

      She had a horrific childhood, a childhood that she wants to make sure no other child experiences. In that, she has been a rock and a gentle hug for our children. She is the ultimate mother bear and if anyone would dare attempt to hurt our children she would be the first one out of the gate. And she not only gives her all to our children, she is always on the look out for children who are being hurt and she is the first one to step in.

      She has a tender heart that goes out of her way to sit dowand talk to a homeless man, addressing him with respect and compassion, asking him how and what she could do to help him get off the streets and back on his feet.

      She is the caring person that thinks of the smallest things that mean the biggest thing to a person in their time of need. A gift that says you are not alone, kind words of support and compassion, a loving smile, an act of kindness.

      She is the woman who stands up for what is right in the face of criticism and attacks from others never giving in to what she feels is wrong.

      She is the wife who gives all she has and more. She is the wife that stands beside her husband in the face of whatever comes their way. Unconditional love that is always there. The best wife in the world.

      For those people out there who see her has only Yappy and choose to see her vocal posts as attacks, I can only say, sit back and read again. Yappy is there to support the victims, side with the good, support the hurt, expose those who choose to hurt others.

      Yet there are those people out there who think it is right to attack people like Yappy and poke and make fun or ridicule the abuse she and others have experienced. Attack the victims of crime somehow making it their fault that they were abused. Use people for their own agenda with no thought of what they are doing to others. Hide behind a mask and lie and scam people. Make excuses for their behavior and not claim responsibility for their actions.

      Well, Yappy for one, and there are others on this blog as well, who will not stand for this crap.

      I know who Yappy is and I feel very blessed that she is my wife, the mother of our children. She is the best friend anyone could ever hope for.

      Delete
  37. So Yappy came by and claimed to be "joe", writing a felony length post about what a saint/victim she is. Cute. I've never seen anyone pull THAT stunt before. ::eye roll::

    ReplyDelete
  38. Susan, has anyone ever called you an anus before now?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Ok, so Webb comes on here talking about an issue yappy had brought up the night before which I had already deleted from the blog? You do this just hours after making a deal with me to shut the hell up about baiting yappy?

    Well, thats it then. I have run this blog for over two years with thousands and thousands of comments by people all over the world. You just because the first ever banned entity (I'm not going to grant you the position of person) from this blog. You leave me no choice. Everyone is more than free, including yappy, to say all they want about you but you are banned. I guess you can go write about this to your reader on your blog about how heroic you are, but we will no longer be reading your rants over here anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I know you never wanted to moderate or ban comments or commenters, Ginger.
    I'm sorry it came this.
    I appreciate it tho...
    Perhaps the tone will improve after your housecleaning~
    Onward & upward.

    ReplyDelete