Monday, March 11, 2013

Google Has Our Back in the Clubhouse

Ain't nothing but a G-thang for us gangsta's in da house.
http://therarereporter.blogspot.com/2013/03/judge-tosses-defamation-suit-out-of.html

Long back story here, but the quick version is that John Margetis was a wanna-be Bill Windsor in that he wanted to destroy our legal system because he could never win in it.  He hung out and corrupted Joey and in so doing became one of my main targets.  Margetis hates me and hates me with a passion and he couldn't let it go.  So he decided to come after me and Black Ops (OReader) and tack on Google while he was at it.  Bad move.

For those who want to expose public corruption, I strongly suggest you go with Google for you blog of choice as we learned that the cowards over at Wordpress will kick you to the curb with only one unsubstantiated complaint, while Google will literally go to the mat for you.  Not only did Google put the smack down on Margetis today, they went for blood as he now might be on the hook for legal fees as well.  You might want to pay attention to this one billy and the other haters of the clubhouse.  You can hate all you want, but if you decide to come after our clubhouse, you may end up paying for it.....literally.

Pass me a beer Petunia

119 comments:

  1. Nothing but the BEST for my OG, Ginger! MichelobUltra (or insert your beverage of choice) for you for life~
    Here, you can wear my tiara on your G-Thang thug hat...
    We're be rolling~
    Clubhouse is rocking out!
    Booyah!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mmmmm thanks, MichelobUltra it is, we had to drink on this story, it was just too much

      Delete

    2. Can't party without the tunes.... I'm hearing......

      Delete
    3. wow. my song disappeared? lol. GS, are you drunk? Messing with the controls? LOL

      < Nazareth - Hair of the Dog >

      Delete
  2. Pie Man Zombie hunterMarch 11, 2013 at 6:24 PM

    I am so happy for you

    ReplyDelete
  3. Poor Susan!! She is really butthurt over being banned from the clubhouse. It's too bad Gingersnap is not as protective of free speech as Google. Gingersnap allows some users to spew baseless accusations with abandon. But when the victims of that spewing try to respond, Ginger bans them. Gingersnap frequently refers to another forum owner that bans dissenters as "Hitler". Yet Ginger himself reaches for the ban button whenever it suits him. The hipocrisy is staggering.

    But you go GOOGLE! Most of us do believe in free speech and we appreciate her comment on Webb's blog Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't know why my cut & paste screwed up but you get the idea.

      Delete
    2. she can't let it go:

      Susan HarbisonMarch 11, 2013 at 4:29 PM
      Ya gotta love the genii over at Ginger's blog! They seem to think this means THEY will not be sued by Margetis. To be fair, I think Ginger knows exactly what is going on, it's the lemmings there that are clueless.

      Margelis may be deterred from filing another suit against anyone if he gets sanctioned over the Google error. But Google's victory is no reflection on the validity or lack thereof, of any claims Margelis might have against the authors of the offending posts.

      And although Google has offered its opinion of the validity of Margelis claims, it is not unusual for a defendant to argue that the claims lack merit, lol. Google's assessment is not quite the same as an actual judgment on the claims.

      Delete
    3. LMAO, she just talks to hear herself doesn't she. I didn't realize she was banned...I was just to happy to see her gone, that I didn't want to jinx it by asking LOL

      She was unable to figure out how to comment without being a bitch. She enjoyed hijacking the blog, and pissing anyone off she could. Heck, she even managed to get me angry- and I usually don't. So glad she is gone.

      LOL, and as usual, she is way off on Margentis being wrong...Gotta love Google..

      Delete
    4. ha, Webby pull the article. First time in his pathetic career someone is actually reading his story and he pulls it

      Delete
    5. HAhahahahHA - I guess all those comments (3?) were just too much for him...lol, and I actually read it David...it was one of your better ones. So yeah, delete it. SMH

      Delete
    6. yeah we wouldn't want to remember Webby any other way

      Delete
    7. Why did he pull the article? Does he hate his own writing? Here's a copy for those who missed it.

      DALLAS -- A Texas man who recently filed a defamation suit against Google and an an anonymous blog author not only lost in court March 11, the plaintiff may be on the hook for legal fees and damages.

      Judge Sheryl McFarlin of 95th Judicial District dismissed the lawsuit filed by John Margetis of Midlothian on Feb. 19. In the motion seeking the dismissal, Google asked for reimbursement of legal fees and damages sufficient enough to deter the plaintiff from filing similar legal suits in the future.

      In the relief sought by Google, the company successfully argued that the lawsuit lacked an essential element. The stories cited by Margetis actually were published by another on the company's free Blogspot.com service, not Google itself.

      Google also argued that Margetis is a frequent subject of the media, and that he is a "self-proclaimed freedom fighter." The plaintiff is known throughout the community for himself posing the question, "Am I a homosexual?" during a protest at a local voting precinct.

      One of the stories Margetis cited in his lawsuit asked the same question that the plaintiff himself had posed in a public forum, Google noted.

      Google also noted that Margetis has had numerous judicial proceedings filed against him that the anonymous blogger covered in opinion pieces.

      Google further backed the anonymous blogger, who identifies only as "Ginger Snap" and posts on "Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com," by noting that the opinion pieces concerned matters of "public concern regarding public figures, safety, the government, community well being and public officials."

      Margetis initially obtained a temporary restraining order against Google and the blog author, but that was dismissed during the company's initial answer to the lawsuit.

      Delete
    8. Oh NOES who is behind this post?March 11, 2013 at 8:47 PM

      Susan is dumb. Sure, Google can get themselves dropped from the suit because they weren't directly responsible for the comments . . . but if in doing so they argue that it was free speech, a matter of public concern, opinion supported factual docs regarding Margetis' legal history, and questions that he himself raised about his sexuality, what judge isn't going to dismiss the whole thing? Besides, Google holds the keys to the John Does. The judge is going to have to make them fork them over. If Google effectively argues the whole thing is merit less based on content rather than who said it (not Google themselves), the whole thing goes down the drain. And if it doesn't, the Google's well paid attorney representing Google has pretty much laid out a defense for the John Does. What success has Margetis had in the past as a pro se litigant?

      Delete
    9. ha ha,
      "then Google's well paid attorney has pretty much laid out the defense"

      ignore the crazy person typing behind the curtain

      Delete
    10. She's a jeanius. Did you see her blog Oh Noes? She looks like she's talking to herself.

      Click to view

      Delete
    11. She says she has lots of readers but the most in a single day is 7?

      Delete
    12. re: the 'click to view' screenshot? She wouldn't have deleted someone's comments would she? Nawww, her stance for freedom of speech, even if its meaningless attacks on one's character for no reason but to hurt others is perfectly acceptable in her world.

      Wait, that's her rules for herself.

      Don't ya love how she's blabbing on Webbys blog whining and crying? Oh the pain, the agony of being banned. As if it were Germany. Does she not realize we have the free right not to listen to her endless drivel and attacks. It's not free speech when your SOLE desire is to cause everyone pain wacko.

      She can point fingers all she wants, she sure is proving just how much she hates not being a part of the popular clubhouse. I'd ROFL love to see her pull her shit in real life. Go to someone's house, do what she's doing to the entire neighbourhood and see how much the police would agree with her right to continue her so-called free speech lol.

      She cannot see how many of us on here disagree and have different opinions but we still find a way to co-exist.

      If she'd only learn to get along, apologize, own her shit - aka accept when she's wrong, she's wrong and admit it and stop attacking everyone for the sake of attacking to hurt the person... but I suspect she's exactly the same in the real world and is rejected at every turn. The funniest stuff was her attempts to educate the attorney. wow

      She just loves to ram down everyone's throat how she's on that self-built pedestal looking down on the rest of us. She even tries to tell us what 'we realllly mean to say"?? wtf?? lol. If we're really 'that bad' why is she bothering? I'm pretty certain there's a lot of blogs out there that have 'intellectually stimulating' discussions.

      Her continual comments against us only proves how butthurt (Petunia's c) she is not being accepted. Of course true to her narcissistic nature, everyone else BUT her is the problem. That's fine, she can talk amongst herself about all the facts to prove that theory. Susan, if we didn't matter and it didn't bother you... you wouldn't be mentioning us right?

      Back to your barbie professor tea set. At least you can invite the rare one and won't be so alone.

      Delete
    13. ^^^^ this is what happens when a grown woman spends her day listening to teens world-ending problems like internet is down or it's too cold to play outside. I forget when to turn off the fingers / thoughts. Long post yappy, you sure live up to your name. Oh look yappy is talking to herself in the third person. Susan disease must be contagious. at least I'm not alone or banned or unloved or did I say alone?

      Delete
    14. per her comment on the rare one's blog about Ginger banning? Umm Susan? Ginger has never ever banned anyone - ever on the blog -ever. With the exception of the rare one who broke the agreement to let everything go and live in peace + yourself. In all the years Ginger has had the blog, you and the rare one are the only ones.

      Doesn't sound like Ginger is ban happy in the least and if you really took notice, you'd see just how tolerant Ginger is.

      Speaks volumes about you doesn't it, when someone like Ginger- with the highest tolerance I've ever 'met' makes the choice to ban.

      Delete
  4. +1 - job well done.

    true about Google though --- Judge and lawyer tested here locally - aint nothing they can do.

    unlike as you say wordsupress.... they will sut you down for one complaint it seems---

    hmm thinking I should complain about other worsupress blogs that are factually incorrect.....(if i had the energy)

    Any ways **Figh Five** Ginger!!

    Keep on keepin on!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. "High Five"

    Figh Five -- typo lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HIGH FIVE and a virtual fist bump!

      Delete
    2. tekilla shots -- no training wheels

      Delete
  6. Where is the super like button? We at AMPP knew a long time ago that WP sucked big ones. That's why we blog at Google ;-)

    Anyway onto other things (you can just pass me a mt dew, no booze for me lol), and this is for petunia and yappy, things are going okay for my child and I. We are in a safe place, the abuser will not hurt us as long as we are here. Other things are working out as well. Say those prayers and keep sending the thoughts our way. You both have told me I am strong, and it is because of you two, Lorraine, Claudine, the moms at AMPP, and my offline friends who keep me going. I had someone say to me that with all the stress I have, I should get drunk, but i asked him why? I would forget this stuff for a few hours, then it would be there when i get sober. And it could be worse after. So why get drunk?

    But anyway all is slowly getting better. Hopefully it will continue :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm still stunned at how much research they put into this. They didn't leave any stone unturned which is saying a lot with Margetis...he has stones all over the place

      Delete
    2. Jen, I am so flattered you give me any credit! I am so proud of you! Your real life friends & the AMPPs & Lorraine, Claudine? Those are your treasures! Stay tough, strong & sober. I have 5+ years recently clean & life gets easier & better with each passing day. I barely remember when I wasn't clean...*waves & (((hugs)))*

      Delete
    3. SMOOCHES and big hugs!! Truth ALWAYS prevails!

      Delete
    4. Congratulations, Petunia, in your life of recovery!!!! I had managed to obtain many years clean and sober in a 12 step program my self. Much needed and grateful for well over 18 years of most of my adult life, raising my 3 kids- I am not in the program anymore, as I no longer identify myself as a person who needs to be, and I am grateful for the past several years of discovering myself outside of the confines of the rooms and labels. I am so happy to see you are doing well in your recovery! waves! (((((( Petunia))))) (((((( Mary B))))).

      Delete
    5. ***swoons***My MaryB hugged me!! I'm a lucky girl~ You're so very sweet~ Thank you...

      Delete
    6. All of you are soooooo very sweet!!!! I have almost 23 years myself. Though I will always need the rooms, just not like I did in the horrible years. I still on occasion need to go to a meeting. I was given tools to live my life. I have to make the choice to use them. With all of my online and offline friends supporting me, I feel much stronger. I luffs all of you! Don't ever think any of you at this clubhouse has not in some way big or small has helped my child and i. Your kind words, your advice, etc...

      Delete
    7. Let's throw it to Ginger for bringing us all together~
      I'm so thankful for the friends, the information, the things I've learned & most especially the humor that brightens the darkest of topics covered.

      Thank you Ginger. I appreciate the hospitality & my pretty, shiny tiara.

      ***WAVING***

      Delete
    8. thanks Petunia. But its just another blog without all you guys. I love my clubhouse team, especially when I look out and see who is against us....wouldn't have it any other way

      Delete
    9. Love Ginger and all the snaps. Feels like one big family. Thanks for letting me play in the club house.
      *wipes away a tear of gratitude*
      *High 5's, & fist bumps*

      Delete
    10. i can't believe this new shit bw is pulling, the coffin, his father? who takes pics like this anyway? then blaming it on mark and allie? he has gone way low, beyond measure, now to be using his info to testify against ally, omg!!! i am so grateful i did not give that slime ball any specifics about anything but my complaints against the government. bw sensationalizes all the pain- trying to gain a bigger audience? this man needs to be stopped before he causes more people danger and pain. how do people feel know who have been videotaped- bill can turn on you and you are powerless- he can use the material you supplied for any thing he wants, and it will be only for his gain.

      Delete
  7. Word has it that Julia Fletcher/Marlene Debek is out stirring up shit again. This delusional person thinks that AMPP and those associated with them have threatened her and her child. She has been running a campaign in order to get support for her pie daddy and has thus far been shunned by every single REAL protective mother and groups. It seems as though she has conveniently "forgotten" about how this shit started with BW/lawless as she has "PTSD" and the messages she sent today is reminding me more and more of Jodi Arias with her "fog". She is requesting that blogs and google remove her name from the searches. In the words of Babs Farris, "that being said" I present to you this:
    http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2005/03/in-aftermath-of-accusation.html
    http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?page=2&xmldoc=in%20fco%2020100128137.xml&docbase=cslwar3-2007-curr&SizeDisp=7
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/strebentechnologies

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah I heard this crap and she's off her rocker. If she continues she's not going to be happy with the end results of her throwing moms under the bus. Demanding to see the "screenshots" from Petunia the Pig's page where this shit started. Same thread that she was ON and tagged all the moms for vexy boy. Get your own screen shots to refresh your memory dingbat!

      Delete
    2. LOL, she wants Google to remove her from searches??? Oh My... and if anyone is a threat to her and her child, it would be Bill, and then her for associating with him.

      Isn't she the brain dead lemming that posts crap and then deletes it?

      Delete
    3. If anyone is a threat to her it's HER. She calls herself an "advocate" and doesn't even have the balls to use her real name and then cry foul when her name is on google searches from a blog that's been up since 2005?! Not to mention everywhere else. But yet outs mothers with gag orders and/or are currently in litigation. Same double standard pietard uses.

      Delete
    4. Bleh. She's trying the dramatic, Help me, threats are flying crap that Windsor does for sympathy.

      She is lonely, everywhere she goes, she pisses people off, her story is bogus, she's gotta keep changing names just to get people to talk to her.

      Total Bitch Moves from every direction.

      Delete
    5. Julia/Marlene/Catherine seems to be lurking behind yet another alias~ I discovered her on the LA RI page blathering to that sick little lemming. Julia/whatever she calls herself today hones in on the really struggling folks & blasts away at them, in between hitting the share, post & comment icons. Delete is her favorite though. She'll blather hate for hours & tell you what a Christian she is & then poof! Julia/whatever deletes it all before the sunshine can hit her 'words'.

      I do believe that this is Julia Fletcher's latest aka FB profile~ my opinion ~ if I am incorrect, I apologize in advance. I'd bet say, $100 on it & to me? That's ALOT of dollar$~
      http://m.facebook.com/home.php?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2Flogin%2Fcheckpoint%2F&_rdr#!/profile.php?id=100003680120239&__user=100001392763358

      Lots of posts on the LA RI page & Julia has me blocked & when I try to see them on the RI page as PetuniaSnodgrass? They aren't there...I use my kids' account & viola!
      Whatchya think?

      Delete
  8. Since we can't read the article. Why don't you give the details

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. someone just posted it up in the comments above

      Delete
    2. The link was bad but going to webs home page it is still there The motion to dismiss hasn't been heard yet. It looks pretty standard. Saying he lacks essential elements etc. what will probably happen is that google will identify the anon bloggers so margarita can pursue them

      Delete
    3. No, it was dismissed today. Google's deadline was March 11th to respond. The judge concurred.

      Delete
  9. I have no personal knowledge so I'm just going by the published reports which are mostly Webb's. something was dismissed today. And there is another hearing on the 14. Only google was dismissed not the bloggers. And Marge

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You may be reading the older article, and not the one he had posted today...you can read it above...

      Delete
    2. I guess the article I read on Webb's blog was dated march 11 and most of it except the part about the suit being dismissed was the same. So I don't know. Unless google took on the representation of the bloggers. They are still being sued by margeetis

      Delete
  10. It looks like the restraining order was dismissed. Bc google answered today. I wonder what the set talent offer by google was?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I bet it was something along the lines of pay us 2 grand now, or a lot more in three days

      Delete
  11. here is the link: http://therarereporter.blogspot.com/2013/03/google-seeks-dismissal-of-defamation.html

    -LordB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah that is the one I read that said it was to be heard on 14th Based on that one there seems enough for judge to order the info on the bloggers. And if he isn't gay.

      Delete
    2. except, neither I or anyone else said he was gay. I asked the question but never said he was in fact gay

      Delete
    3. I think it's funny that Webb re-worked the article. The funniest part is he deleted everyone's comments except Susan. -Bob

      Delete
    4. Susan Snorebison, ya, good luck with that Webby. It's all fun and games until she starts the know it all crap.

      Delete
  12. Congratulations! And thanks for the headsup on Wordpress. Maybe I should pack my bags. I have been trying to reply all night but I think you guys have kept the circuit boards busy. Oh well. If my other posts should show up, just delete them or ask me to delete which ever comes first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that was an interesting article about the DC trip....I have been interested in how everyone really reacted to all of that.

      Delete
    2. Yep, just read the DC article Lawlessnomore, it's great. Love the inside info, which confirms many suspicions raised here.

      You rock.

      Delete
    3. wooooah wait a tick, did I read that those dvd's are/were blank and only had LINKS on them? WOW

      Delete
    4. What? Blank dvds only with links? WOW HE REALLY IS THAT LAZY

      Delete
    5. Thank you. Yes, a screen comes up with a picture of the road, and there are several links. The disc only has 2 files: Lawless and setup. Nothing plays on it directly; it just opens up a window to the web.

      Delete
  13. I thought about starting a blog on google but figured no one would read it:-(
    Cheryl Sosby

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. at least they will get your back if someone does read it

      Delete
    2. Go for it Cheryl. It would be therapeutic for you to write, and I am sure people would read it.

      Delete
  14. ty:-) I had 1 on google before and only wrote like 2 X on it. So here is the old one I might start back up if anyone wants to comment on it. It lists me as Pepper Miller btw. lol

    Cheryl

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://sassymomma2006.blogspot.com/

      Delete
    2. Good deal. Thanks for the link, You go girl!!

      Delete
  15. Booyah!

    Our right to express opinion, discuss freely and joke about it was protected.

    Speech intended incite naughty things is STILL not protected, not even here, eh Susan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Snoozan Snorbison. LMAO such a ______________ too many words to fit in there.

      Delete
  16. Which one of y'all did this?

    That's some funny snit right there.
    I pee-ed my pjs alittle~

    Seriously, GO LOOK~

    http://m.facebook.com/home.php?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2Flogin%2Fcheckpoint%2F&_rdr#!/walter.windsor.96?__user=100001392763358

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you do not want to be my frd, I am going to tell my sonny boy to be nice and take down some picture.... to give back the money he took

      Delete
    2. petunia here look just trying to get my boy to play nice http://www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica?ref=ts&fref=ts#!/lawlessamerica/posts/272467782887520

      Delete
    3. The more I've thought about it, after the initial first glimpse humor? What if one of the grandkids or other friends or relatives saw it...they may be hurt or sickened... I get the intention is/was for shock/funny value to Bill after his morbid exposé of his dad's funeral & the ickie wish for an email from Dad...
      It was funny, but it could really hurt some that aren't responsible for Bill's snit...
      I apologize for my laughing at someone's pain & sorrow. I was wrong.

      Delete
    4. I'd agree with you Petunia... except in my opinion, none of his family will read it and he has no real life friends. He even admitted that in DC. None of his kids, son in law, grandkids, even sister in laws, etc are on any of his pages. None, except his 1 brother Tony.

      It's morbid satire. Everyone knows it's not really the dad. I think it's comical, morbid yup. but funny. the only sad thing I see right now is that Billy has determined its the works of Allie or someone without any proof. If he'd block "walter" and let it die, then none of this would get any attention.

      BILLY already made a alawless.com article about it. He's throwing more temper tantrums and accusations which only makes things worse. If someone made a joke about my deceased grandma and her penchant for guilt trips to get others to do what she wanted at times.. I'd think it was funny. Maybe not the choice of pics but the message is funny. My 2cents.

      Luff ya and your HUGE HEART! You are 1 of a kind.

      Delete
    5. Its not temper tantrums. Its hurting my little girl in real court. And its not funny. It wasn't funny before Bill thought it was me and its not funny now. I did not do that shit and whoever did, thanks a fucking lot for hurting my little girl more. Its as bad as the nasty shit Windsor does. You belong together.

      Delete
    6. I agree that his pursuit of vendettas against former LA supporters—most notably Ms. Overstreet—are the ugliest and worst things I've seen Windsor do. Intervening in court cases (custody cases perhaps worst of all) to hurt people merely because they've crossed him is simply awful. Windsor's ego is a frightening thing.

      I'm very sorry, Ms. Overstreet.

      Delete
    7. Good morning Allie. I didn't make the page and I don't know who did. I was laughing at the comments Walter was making to Billy (like GI joe, etc). That's the part I was laughing at, I am not bothered by dark humor or the non-political (un?) correctness of life.

      What I didn't see until talking with Petunia last night (after my 12:04 am post above) is that it was affecting you and others deeply - the bigger picture. I stopped chiming in, let it go and went to bed. Sometimes I can be narrow minded and insensitive and that's where I was last night. I am sorry for all the pain your child is going through and continues to go through. I am sorry Billy is blaming you and making those accusations.

      There is another concern here. We joke a lot and make videos (a lot). Is Billy going to start blaming her for everything now? Where does it end? He'll have her owning this blog by the end of the day too. Freaking ass.

      Delete
  17. I am New to Facebook and I am going to say hello to my Son.... anyone would like to take screen shots

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ***waves to Walter! So sorry your funeral was plastered all over FB like a Chamber of Commerce ribbon cutting for a new hair salon***

      He's hoping for an email, I heard.... Hook him up MrW~

      Delete
    2. I am just giving sonny boy, what he wants

      Delete
    3. Okie dokie.... I'm gonna be REAL careful what I wish for henceforth.
      Good luck, Mr Windsor. I'm sorry your boy is a total AssRag...& that you passed. My condolences.

      Delete
    4. going to tell that Julia person she is a hussy, and my Boy will not play haouse with a hussy

      Delete
    5. http://www.facebook.com/?sk=welcome#!/photo.php?fbid=482589758469352&set=o.267163020084663&type=1

      Delete
  18. So there is or there isn't still a lawsuit against the Joeys??

    Under pressure?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dPBzHIuKzM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess part of it, the google part, was thrown out today and the rest will probably be tossed on the 14th.

      Delete
    2. This is the song that will be sung on the 14th in honor of Google and their battle:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lwSp3Hw-Uo

      Delete
    3. Under pressure? lol highly doubtful Anonymous.

      If anything, what google's excellent lawyer did today was also provide a fabulous defense for GS & the rest. Very accurate, fantastic research.

      I think it's safe to say Google has this in the bag. Without Google, the 'plaintiff' has no way to obtain email addresses and IP addresses. Then the plaintiff also has to assume the email is correct, sue the ISP provider and on and on and on. While I'm beginning to understand this plaintiff appears to be close to a vexatious litigant himself, the hills he has to climb is astounding. Then there's the lack of historical success (like BIlly) in the courtroom.

      So what was that about under pressure?

      Delete
    4. The arrogance of the plaintiff to assume Google doesn't handle cases like this all the time, day after day. Those 'boys' know what they're doing and I think this tiny case is a nice little chuckle / giggle snort in their offices. Especially if they've also read a bit about Windsor and his vexatious history, all our videos', etc. :)

      Delete
    5. What was it about under pressure, yappy?

      Well:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1hnVutWxos

      Delete
    6. You sooo funnneeeee. That was hilarious. Thanks. I have my nutty side and my smart side and my beautiful side and my bitchy side. I love and accept every piece of ME <3

      Here's MY theme song. Sing with me :

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRqoIHZpWUU

      You know, you wouldn’t want it any other way

      Delete
    7. I think I'll venture to say that it's not just ONE lawyer at Google, it's an ARMY of them.

      Delete
  19. I second the "Go for it". It does not matter how many read it, only WHO reads it. My blog was the definite turning point in my case. Disclosure: Initially, it put me in further danger. Once comments started getting posted the tide turned.

    HawaiiCorruption

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is the video I recorded earlier http://youtu.be/dGuvfpbw60g

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks ya'll. Add me or bookmark me http://sassymomma2006.blogspot.com/
    Cheryl Sosby (Pepper Miller)

    ReplyDelete
  22. OMgee I giggle snorted my smoothie everywhere! This is so worthy of a screenshot! *waves above to Walter* creepy but kinda cool to know heaven has internet too.

    http://oi48.tinypic.com/27y4v1g.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Billy is blaming Mark and Allie for this. Now how's that for zero investigations and just blind anger and rage, hoping to get sympathy. Why name anyone? Douche

      Delete
    2. well, he's blaming someone associated with them, but still why name them at all?

      Delete
    3. Ok sorry, he is blaming them directly now.

      Lawless America No, it is Allie Overstreet and/or Mark Supanich. True scumbags.

      Delete
    4. Wow he is just such a dick. He was already working with them, so is this his excuse when everyone knows what he did to Allie?

      Lawless America They stole the photos off a tribute website for my father. The recourse I have is that I will work with the attorneys for Allie Overstreet's ex and Mark Supanich's ex. I will work hard to expose them. I have filed criminal charges against them, and I am preparing a civil action.

      Delete
    5. Di Marigold Technology has enabled the mental illness of so many people. A very hateful thing for someone to do.
      3 minutes ago · Like

      Di is very correct. It's amazing how much hate Billy spews. So he can steal all the pics and information he wants and its ok because he's media but someone pulls a prank and it's the end of the world.

      Delete
    6. He does spew hate. I doubt that Allie or Mark made that spoof. I laughed, after how he paraded those pics around, someone he's hated & raged & ranted on was bound to do it. Can't blame whoever did it. Not one bit.
      Out of respect for AssRag's fam that doesn't deserve to be hurt by his spew, I apologize for my laughing out loud. I certainly don't want Allie or any other parent to get any of tidal wave proportion ripple effects, more than they already are...

      Bill Windsor just showed how deeply he can hate & hit.
      WTF has Allie's kid or any other kid ever done to deserve his poking around in their family's personal problems?
      He's so furious with Allie & seeing daily just how much he needed her, so she is the 1st target he picked! There's literally 100s of folks that could easily have done it, but he zeroed right in on her...

      He's absolutely horrible. He put that snit out there...what'd he expect those he's hurt to do? Send tributes of donations or pies?
      He makes me physically ill. & I'm not a victim of his in anyway.
      Grrrrrr.

      Delete
    7. OMgeeee is right! That good ol' coldsore windsore standard.

      Delete
    8. No one will give Billy ANY attention on FB or elswwhere until something like this happens.

      Billy already wrote a freaking article about this "walter" thing which turns HIMSELF into the victim and a martyr. He's turned this into an attention show for himself. the pie freaker could block 'walter' but he won't because it gives BIlly a pity party to attend.

      Give it a rest jackass. Block walter and call it anight if it's that horrific. Turning it into the ultimate gongshow is feeding the rest. Man he sure brings on the negative attention.

      Delete
  23. Yet another believes that the police are in a conspiracy.....
    "Scott Goodyear: That kind of stuff has been done to me by government affiliates (probably dirty cop Vincent Minnillo of CCPD) a couple times. Just means your getting to them."

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sheri Westover
    This is disgusting! Using a dead man for a page. Very demented ppl.
    ...Sent from New Smyrna Beach, FL

    ReplyDelete
  25. Cheryl Martone
    Where you Walter? Are you OK? is that you in the picture, saying prayers for you, OMG.. Is that why you are saying see you in heaven, many blessings for you. Are you in CT?
    ...
    1:17amExpand
    Show ImagesWalter Windsor
    no I am in Heaven, do not worry about me, I know my Son has been very Bad to you

    please give your good frd Mary B a Hug for me

    ReplyDelete
  26. Cheryl Martone
    OH OK Bill, ya can't fool a child of a PI, hey hope they are treating you well up there O:)
    I have to give Mary B. lots of hugs cause she needs them. It was my Bday today could you send me some too XO XO my son loves you too <3

    OMG she think I am Bill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some snit is going DOWN on the Lawless Main Page. William parody is wreaking havoc! It is outta control!

      Delete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Congrats Clubhouse** waves from EH, anyone wanna share the peace pipe,lol, pass the popcorn please, yall have made my day once again, ahhh my heros

    ReplyDelete
  29. How come I'm the one that gets blamed for terrorizing poor billy, and last night Walter shows up. While I think he has asked for any nasty thing he gets, sadly I didn't do the Walter sctick. Why is he blaming poor allie?? Oh. Ya he is an asshole, there's always that.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Walter(the FB plant of sorts) from NY, some opine., the creation in WWW-land
    So, why are some defending Bill when he makes false accusations against his Ex Assistant....?
    Is this a side aspects of this, some coming to Bill's side....?
    Weird.
    the "Walter sctick", even some pick apart the grammar like Bill's editor cops.
    As to stuff put up on the WWW, who put it up... was it not Bill in re this Walter in the first instance.
    Why would Bill put up stuff on Walter. strange.




    ReplyDelete
  31. Haven't checked in with tha blog thang Gansta Snap...but good job, on a roll.
    B

    ReplyDelete
  32. Someone please contact me,Thanks!

    ReplyDelete