Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Total Dram King

He just can't stop with his Allie thing:

LAWLESS AMERICA UPDATE - MARCH 27, 2013:

Unfortunately, most of my time has been spent preparing for my "trial" as a would-be serial killer scheduled for April 8, 2013 in Lexington, Missour I guess if you went down to fight a traffic ticket you would say you are standing trial for capital punishment?i. I have filed motions and my vexatious black blood was really running at this point requesting to film and audio record and broadcast the hearing LIVE the circus is in town; for a court reporter and my own court reporter you know, one to actually record what was said and then another to record what I say happened; to allow affidavits to be presented in lieu of live testimony or, in the alternative, depositions or testimony by telephone; for a jury trial thats all fine and dandy except for that little fact that its NOT A TRIAL; for accelerated discovery anything but slow an methodical. I have also filed a counter-complaint against Allie L. Overstreet citing eight crimes committed I don't want anyone to forget how vexatious I really am. This photo is Lafayette Hall in Lexington, Missouri, where my hearing will be.

I still cannot access www.LawlessAmerica.com. I've spent hours on the phone with GoDaddy, Enom, and AT&T and up to 5 minutes actually talking to them. I can't update the site, as I can't access it just in case you haven't caught on by now I'm not too bright. Once I can access it, I will post everything that I have filed it will almost feel like I filed them again....ohhh what a rush.

Thanks so much to the many people who have sent affidavits to be presented to the court you are all now my legal bitches. I've received approximately 40 so far. Six people have confirmed that they are coming to the hearing in Lexington, Missouri. If you can, Meet Me in Missouri lets make an event out of it.

I will be sending out news releases to all the media in Missouri you are never one to let a trash can get a day off are you?. Maybe some of them will show up to cover the "trial"heh notice how I put "" around trial, oh you didn't notice good little lemmings of a disowned grandpa  accused of being a would-be serial killer ummm no, accused of being a stalker which you are most definitely going to prove.

I hope I can squeeze out a day to go to Florida yeah isn't that just down the road from Missouri? to look at an RV before I head to Missouri you could probably look at an RV in Georgia Bill, they are all over the place and for you they are all the same...meaning you cant have one. I very badly want to have an RV that can be set up with a permanent film studio inside I'm going to call it The Fugitive. If I had such a set-up on the 241-day movie road trip, I would have saved at least 200 hours of set-up and tear-down and maybe you dumb lemmings might have a movie by now, not to mention all the carrying, loading, and unloading I'm fat and old, give me a break please. I also would have been able to stop anywhere along the route to film ummm I think you can do that with any vehicle that has brakes in it. Our second would-be RV provider appears to have fallen through, and I have no money, but I must figure out how to accomplish this buy a lottery ticket?.

I have to reschedule my film trip you mean the one no one understood why you scheduled in the first place? as soon as my status as a serial killer is resolved spoiler alert...I plead down to stallker. I hope to film a number of people on the way back to Georgia. I will probably go from Kansas City Missouri down to Dallas come get me Billy, Houston yappy is ready too, Biloxi and Gulfport Mississippi, Destin Florida, Birmingham Alabama, and back home in Atlanta. If you are anywhere near that route, please email nobodies@att.net with FILM TRIP in all caps in the subject line and I will be there to give you your life dream of filming yourself and uploading it to youtube.

90 comments:

  1. Ginger is baaaack! Yay!
    -666

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @666 you should run and hide. I'm not sure Ginger is ok with satan aiding and abetting.

      @Ginger. I'm ready too? I haven't packed a bag, I need to get my hair and nails done. What does one wear when a stalker rolls into town? Allie? Ideas? Is it considered formal or semi-formal? It's so hard to tell looking at all his stock photos, how one is to dress in his presence. Can't Billy be satisfied with stalking just you?

      Delete
    2. http://stellasoh.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/princess-chiwawa3.jpg

      Delete
  2. Actually bill has fulfilled allies Tro because she noted he would be filming in the courts. Lol I still stand by my prediction of 30 days in contempt of court or some charge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll buy you a coke. He gets picked up before the court date, you owe me one.

      Delete
  3. I also have been watching videos of the dept of homeland security having armored personnel carriers or trucks for the non techie people. So nothing new we've had them for a long time but I wonder if the county court will have a large presence of swat there for

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pie Man Zombie HunterMarch 27, 2013 at 4:35 PM

    Has anyone made screen shots of Allie TRO that Pie Man posted, one with her address and phone number bluzz out, to show how he LIES Lies and Lies

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He blurred it out now? It wasn't like that the other day, and he posted that he still can't see the site, so how could he blur it if he doesn't have access to it? Part of the lie?

      Delete
    2. don't matter...I have non-blurred screen shots...all in his hand written w/crazola crayons :D

      Delete
  5. Pie Man Zombie HunterMarch 27, 2013 at 5:38 PM

    is the powerpuff girls going to share it, so I can share it to TAEFR?

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://www.yelp.com/biz/alcatraz-media-atlanta more people calling him a scam

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g147293-i28-k3882216-Warning_about_Alcatraz_Media_Inc_Company-Punta_Cana_La_Altagracia_Province_Dominican_Republic.html

      Delete
    2. Punta (from Urban Dictionary) (in re to comment above from Dominican Republic)
      The slang term, made up by Groucho-Won, that is commonly in conjunction with the one and only, Vagina.
      She spread her legs and I observed her punta.

      Delete
    3. His son's profile on Trip Advisor: www.tripadvisor.com/members/alcatrazm

      Delete


  7. Bill Windsor Bambi, I'm representing myself, but I don't have a fool for a client. Then again, I am trying to expose every corrupt judge in America, so justice for me may be even more of an illusion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here's a tidbit of what I assume is going on with respect to Billy wanting to go to Florida for an RV. In June, 2012, Bill was trying to get an RV from a charity group in (or near) Titusville, FL. Apparently, this group specializes in donating RVs to any non-profit organization, but the organization must prove to them it is a bona fide IRS 501(c)3, a designation Lawless America didn't have last year. I don't know if Windsor has changed LA's tax status or not, but this may explain why he didn't get an RV...again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ahhhhh, you don't say?

      If he actually tried this now with everyone watching that would be game set and jumpsuit for him.

      Delete
    2. Geez. Why am I shocked by this?

      Delete
    3. Additionally, we know Windsor had at least two different 501(3)c organizations offer to become a proxy for Windsor and LA to get donated goods and services. Don't know if Windsor got anything out of it or not.

      Delete
  9. ohhhh, I see a blocking in Stephanie Lynn's future...

    Stephanie Lynn Bill I trust you... So.... Did you threaten to go to her hearing for her daughter? And work with her ex? And publish the address of her children? I know you have never threatened anyone with a gun. You stated a while back you bought one for protection because you were being threatened. But you never threatened anyone.
    10 minutes ago via mobile · Like

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, Bill finally got on his .com site. He's posted his court docs.

      Delete
    2. I always had Stephanie earmarked as a future ex-lemming. She still has a functioning mind and if you listen to her story its actually pretty believable. She is not bill's kind of follower

      Delete
    3. Hi stephanie..yes he did threaten to go to Allie's hearing for her daughter. Don't know about publishing her address but he did disclose my personal information and I had nothing to do with Windsor. Heads up! He DID THREATEN to go after people and bragged about carrying his weapon in washinnton, Dc.

      Delete
    4. Ohhhhh my favorite dumbass quote from his LA.com page:

      Bill Windsor will be representing himself. When asked about this decision, Windsor said: "I've never met an attorney who I felt could do a better job than I can. And I work for free. Furthermore, I'm honest; I care; and I will work as long and as hard as needed to be fully-prepared. When you get right down to it, I have no respect for attorneys. It's a profession that often requires dishonesty."


      Ok. So WHO was asking Billy this? Did he stand and look in the mirror for this interview? and honest? Bwaahahahahahaha that's even funnier than "Losean" posting as anonymous today. Another fun-filled day in the clubhouse.

      Delete
    5. this reminds me of when Joey would interview himself on his own story

      Delete
    6. Read these documents guys, he is blaming her for everything that anyone has said or done or he's twisting it some way. This is deeply disturbing. Read it.

      Delete
    7. why not, this is from a guy who is requesting his own court reporter

      Delete
    8. Read the bottom of page 4....so after claiming he's afraid for his life he's demanding that the court force her to go to his hotel room for a taped interview.

      Delete
    9. http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/movie/stalkers/Allie-Overstreet/overstreet-protective-order-motion-for-discovery.pdf

      Delete
    10. Thanks LNM, I went over there and read his "article" but forgot about reading the documents. I started to read his physical description of Allie, he tries to slam her appearance? Has he looked in the mirror lately? So he's now claiming he's in fear? REALLY? He's such an abusive sick POS.

      I think the Karma train heading for him is going to be a big one. Given what I know is going on (legally) that we CAN'T speak about out here unrelated to Allie's case? ooooh poor pieturd has no idea. hehehehe

      Delete
    11. Bill Windsor will be representing himself. When asked about this decision, Windsor said: "I've never met an attorney who I felt could do a better job than I can. And I work for free. Furthermore, I'm honest; I care; and I will work as long and as hard as needed to be fully-prepared. When you get right down to it, I have no respect for attorneys. It's a profession that often requires dishonesty."<-----if that's the case he would have made a WONDERFUL attorney.

      Delete
    12. And the documents have Allie's and Mark's addresses on them, despite his repeated claims that he never published them. He mentions Elizabeth, Joey, Deb, and others.

      Delete
    13. LNM yes, he twisted everything into this hearing, including stuff he wrote about before Allie even left LA, and before the DC trip. Unbelievable.

      And he repeated himself several times in that whinny protection request. Just by his physical description of Allie, you can see just how petty, pathetic, juvenile, immature, and just plain butt hurt he is. I mean really. It screams, here is a old-ass mantrum on paper "folks".

      Delete
    14. Hold the phone, did he delete Stephanie's comment?

      Delete
    15. No, he answered her.

      Lawless America Stephanie, I am anxious to testify for her ex. I didn't threaten going. I don't threaten. I would have been there on April 1 to tell her judge that she's a pathological liar. But she got a protective order by claiming I'm out to shoot a bunch of folks, so now I can't be there. And all this garbage about me publishing addresses is just that. Her address is in the phone book, and it comes up in simple searches online. My home address has been published by these creeps far and wide, so what about my children and grandchildren? One of these wackos claims to have been following one of my granddaughters and has claimed to describe what she was wearing one day. To every liar, I say this: I will work to expose you. I will publish your address. If you have a valid reason to fear that someone who shouldn't know your address will have it, then don't lie. Stephanie, I am very disappointed in you. You know me better than most, but you want to believe scumbags.
      8 minutes ago

      Delete
    16. He mentions all of us. We are John Does 1-1,000. That was dummy's surprise for his "stalkers." He now thinks that we are all on trial here. Meaning that he wants all of to pay his legal fees.

      Delete
    17. Never mind, I found it.

      Delete
    18. note to self, self refresh before posting...NBTDT thanks.

      Delete
    19. The fact is, if you are an American citizen you have already been sued by Windsor at least once.

      Delete
    20. It's a temper tantrum. Georgia won't let him press charges so he's using Allie to push through documents the courts won't accept in Georgia. He's getting more and more desperate.

      Delete
  10. Again...
    + 1 to all the clubhouse here at joeyisalittlekid
    saves me time and resources to just take a quick 'look-see' here to get all the updates I need.

    Checked navigator and the flatbed ford -- 118 miles to Lexington, MO.

    keep on keeping on!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, but you have to take the trip to read this:

      http://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/movie/stalkers/Allie-Overstreet/overstreet-protective-order-petition-form.pdf

      It's Bill's petition for a protective order. It says things like "that's a big fat lie". No kidding. He doesn't say "I don't have a fuckface" but he has all the rest covered. He mentions Brannon, who he refers to has hammer boy and Curtis, friend of hammer boy. Too funny. Sort of, it's really not 'cause he wants Allie to pay his travel costs.

      Delete
    2. LOL NBTDT I thought we already covered the fact that he can not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he does not infact have a fuckface. That is why he left it out.

      Delete
    3. I don't have a fuckface

      I'm a strict empiricist; let's send him to jail for thirty days to test that assertion. I think he'll also be playing "lick the pole", but not the same kind with the flag on top like the kid in "A Christmas Story".

      Delete
    4. AHAHAHHHAAAHHHHAAAA I love it Sluggo!!! thank you I needed that today! <3

      Delete
  11. What an utter train wreck.

    Last week I sent Ms. Overstreet a PDF version of one of Judge Duffey's orders in Georgia federal court, detailing a small portion of Windsor's contempt and general asinine behavior in that court. I understood Ms. Overstreet would print it out and supply it to the judge in her case in Missouri to give him/her an idea of what kind of loon Windsor is.

    Now that he's gone and filed all of this absurd dreck, I'm not sure the Duffey printout was necessary. One certainly hopes that the Missouri judge will see the looniness for him/herself. (Further support from the Georgia court can't hurt, though.)


    (By the way, folks, an Order for Protection—which is what Ms. Overstreet got—is not the same thing as a TRO, or temporary restraining order. A TRO is just a certain common variety of injunction, usually issued in a civil lawsuit. TROs rarely if ever have anything to do with preventing someone from stalking or threatening another person. I have no direct experience with Missouri courts, so perhaps they have terminology I'm not familiar with, but I'm pretty sure it's inaccurate to call the Order she got regarding Windsor a TRO. I think the correct term is "protective order" or "Order for Protection.")

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A TRO is in full effect----you sure you can understand THIS?

      Pursuant to statutes 455.035 to 455.045, RSMo, the court finds that there IS an immediate and present danger of abuse to Petioner by you or that Petitioner has been a victim of stalking by you and that there is good cause to issue an Order of Protection. The court has already ORDERED him, William M. Windsor, Respondent, not: "Abuse, theraten to abuse, stalk, molest or disturb the peace of Petioner wherever Petitioner may be found. Enter or stay upon premises wherever the Petioner may reside, place of employment or school. Communicate with Petioner in any manner or through any medium.

      Any ex parte order of protection granted pursuant to sections 455.010 to 455.085 shall be to protect the petitioner from abuse or stalking and may include:

      (1) Restraining the respondent from abusing, threatening to abuse, molesting, stalking or disturbing the peace of the petitioner;

      (2) Restraining the respondent from entering the premises of the dwelling unit of petitioner when the dwelling unit is:

      (a) Jointly owned, leased or rented or jointly occupied by both parties; or

      (b) Owned, leased, rented or occupied by petitioner individually; or

      (c) Jointly owned, leased or rented by petitioner and a person other than respondent; provided, however, no spouse shall be denied relief pursuant to this section by reason of the absence of a property interest in the dwelling unit; or

      (d) Jointly occupied by the petitioner and a person other than the respondent; provided that the respondent has no property interest in the dwelling unit;

      (3) Restraining the respondent from communicating with the petitioner in any manner or through any medium;

      (4) A temporary order of custody of minor children where appropriate.

      http://i48.tinypic.com/a4tmhy.png

      Delete
    2. YOU don't have to be snarky. Attorney qualified the comment "I have no direct experience with Missouri courts, so perhaps they have terminology I'm not familiar with,....". Terminology and nomenclature is not the same in every state or every country, no matter what the object.

      Delete
    3. do you think he is going to jail?

      Delete
    4. Who was beign snarky?? WOW,take a chill pill, you always up someones ass or another.

      Delete
    5. A TRO is not in effect its a Protective order there is a huge difference and although i agree about her being up someones butt you were being snarky

      Delete
    6. Er, Anonymous @8:21, I don't see why you think that either the text or the image you posted refutes what I said. The words "temporary restraining order" and the initialism "TRO" are nowhere to be found in either one. However, the phrase "Order for Protection" is in both. Open your eyes: the image you posted has "Order for Protection" as (the last 3/8 of) its title!

      So it would appear to me that the material you've posted suggests that I'm correct: this is not a TRO, but rather an Order for Protection. That happens to be exactly what the text you posted says. What leads you to believe otherwise?

      Also, sure--there's nothing terribly hard to understand in the Order text you've quoted. I'm not familiar with the specific Missouri statutes that are cited, but anyone can look those up on the Web very easily. The concepts mentioned in the passage you quoted from the Order are a little obscure, but they're not really all that complicated.

      Delete
    7. So my biggest question is did Allie ever live with Bill? Does her volunteering with him qualify her to even apply for this? I have not seen OFP anywhere that is not for family or intimate partner.


      Petition for Order of Protection: This form is used by a person requesting a full order of protection against another adult (person over the age of 17). A full order of protection prohibits the person who it is issued against from further acts, attempts or threats of abuse or stalking. The petition may request additional relief such as maintenance, child custody, child support and/or visitation. A full order of protection is issued for a specific period of time - at least 180 days but not to exceed one year.

      In order to qualify for an order of protection, the petitioner must be a family member, household member or intimate partner living with or without the respondent, or an adult who has been the victim of stalking.

      A “family or household member” is defined as husband/wife, former husband/wife, adults related by blood or marriage, adults who are presently living together or have lived together in the past, adults who are or have been in a continuing social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature, and adults who have a child or children together regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together at any time.

      I am glad you see this as valid attorney because I think it will be dismissed. It saddens me to say that, but I am hoping he will be arrested on other charges when he is there. I see this as a dead end.
      *~* Redd *~*

      Delete
    8. oops 2-4th paragraphs should have been in quotation marks, those are from a MO website on OFP's.

      Delete
    9. Also in the courts where I watch with the DV victims these exparte orders are granted if the judge believes their side of the story. Then a short time later a hearing is required to show evidence and let the other party tell their side. So yeah anon it is already granted but it may still be tossed out. I go in with rape victims a lot for these as a person of support. I am not an attorney. I am a tassle twirler. *~* Redd *~*

      Delete
    10. I have no idea whether Ms. Overstreet's petition "is valid," that is, whether it will be upheld against Windsor's apparent (though more than slightly incoherent) objection—but it's quite clear that it's not necessary for Windsor to be "family or [an] intimate partner" of hers.

      Once again, it's written right in the text you quoted: "In order to qualify for an order of protection, the petitioner [that's Ms. Overstreet] must be a family member, household member or intimate partner living with or without the respondent, or an adult who has been the victim of stalking."

      Ms. Overstreet contends that Windsor has been stalking her. I don't know if that's legally correct (and Windsor obviously thinks it isn't, notwithstanding the fact that he accuses pretty much every person who has ever written an unkind thing about him online of stalking him), but presuming she can convince the judge of that, the fact that Windsor isn't a relative or a boyfriend of hers is not a problem for her petition.

      I have no idea what's going to happen once Windsor and his circus act make their way into a rural Missouri courtroom. The Missouri judge will have the power to do just about anything (s)he likes with the case. Regardless, I don't see anything self-evidently invalid about the Order for Protection here.

      Delete
    11. ok thank you *~* Redd *~*

      Delete
  12. "placed or attempted to place Windsor in apprehension of physical and immediate harm"

    That is the stupidest conglomeration of words thrown together to make no sense whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dunno; it's pretty close to a common definition of the civil tort of assault. (Legal gobbledygook can look like nonsense even when it isn't.)

      I'd bet Windsor borrowed most of that phrase from some protective-order form. In fact, it's probably Missouri's: take a look at http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=537 , and check out page 2, section 8.

      Delete
    2. yeah I mean I can see he is trying to meet some kind of legal milestone...but the statement itself makes no sense. How could allie attempt to place him in apprehension of physical harm? The word apprehension seems way out of place here, certainly it couldn't be a provable legal barometer

      Delete
    3. For whatever it's worth, though, the State of Missouri evidently thinks it is a "provable barometer."

      A clichéd example might be the old "flinch" game, wherein Person X throws what looks like a punch at Person Y, but stops juuust short of actually landing the blow. If Y flinches at the pantomimed punch, X wins; if Y doesn't flinch, Y wins.

      What X is doing in that situation is "attempt[ing] to place Y in apprehension of immediate physical harm"; in other words, X is trying to get Y to believe that (s)he is about to be physically injured, immediately. That's the whole point of the game.

      And, again, that's just about exactly what the civil tort of assault is—causing someone to believe that you're about to cause him or her physical harm. (Battery, then, is when you actually connect.)

      Now, whether either Windsor or Ms. Overstreet actually has attempted to cause the other to believe that (s)he is about to be physically injured is an open question. Missouri courts have apparently been applying this legal standard for (presumably many) years, so if I were arguing this case for either one of them I'd look at previous cases with something like similar facts; incidents involving online harassment would be a key thing to look up.

      Maybe both protective orders are invalid, because (possibly—I don't know) nothing that's happened between these two has met the legal standard you've quoted. I don't know enough about the Missouri law to say.

      Delete
  13. Lawless America Stephanie, I am anxious to testify for her ex. I didn't threaten going. I don't threaten. I would have been there on April 1 to tell her judge that she's a pathological liar. But she got a protective order by claiming I'm out to shoot a bunch of folks, so now I can't be there. And all this garbage about me publishing addresses is just that. Her address is in the phone book, and it comes up in simple searches online. My home address has been published by these creeps far and wide, so what about my children and grandchildren? One of these wackos claims to have been following one of my granddaughters and has claimed to describe what she was wearing one day. To every liar, I say this: I will work to expose you. I will publish your address. If you have a valid reason to fear that someone who shouldn't know your address will have it, then don't lie. Stephanie, I am very disappointed in you. You know me better than most, but you want to believe scumbags.
    8 minutes ago · Like..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Print that everyone and save for your files. That is a direct threat to anyone he has ever accussed of lying.

      Delete
    2. Keep talking assbag, can't WAIT to see you on the evening news being arrested.

      Delete
    3. His point about posting addresses is a sidestep. He posted everyone's addresses on his .com site for anyone to see. More importantly to people who would never know of their existence but for his posting, along with his bias, hateful articles which could incite some unstable people to take further action.

      Delete
    4. Exactly. Posting their address under a protection order, to people who would have never known they existed, with words to get people to hate them and possibly stalk them, is pretty self explanatory. He is coaxing weirdos to act on his words.

      Delete
    5. Wow, he's actually saying to anyone he "thinks" lies about him , he will post their address? OMG! Posting an address is one thing. Posting an address where children live, along with his lies setting it up as a hate thing where he encourages people to go there, is another thing all together. What an assbag stalker. He's going to get a lot of people in trouble by having them do his dirty work.

      Delete
  14. @ Gingersnap: Stephanie got sucked back in, she's not ready to be an ex lemming yet.

    Stephanie Lynn Bill I didn't believe what they said. I just wanted to know if you were going to court for her ex or not. But I know for a fact you never threatened anyone.
    11 minutes ago via mobile · Like

    Lawless America When someone makes up ridiculous lies about me, I assume they have lied about their outrageous claims about their ex. I wouldn't believe a word that Allie or Mark Supanich ever utter.
    2 minutes ago · Edited · Like

    Stephanie Lynn Yeah it's hard to believe someone once you catch them hurting innocent people even once.
    2 minutes ago via mobile

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Billy? Assumptions is not evidence dumbass. This sentence alone proves he's only after Allie for revenge.

      People have caught him red-handed in blatant lies and he still fights to keep that mask up.

      Most of this documentation has nothing to do with Allie in the least. He wants to put all of us on trial. Jackass cry baby.

      Delete
    2. or maybe scare..... try to talk him dowm

      Delete
    3. maybe she's talking about him??

      Delete
  15. @ Attorney: Bill has help now. Somebody posted links for him, one is a Talkshoe show for a sovereign group that says the courts don't have power and haven't had power since 1795. Another one is a radio call in show with an English guy giving instruction on how to make a Judge run out fo the court room (Bill may have that one covered without help). And the 3rd one wouldn't down load, pity because I was really curious - maybe you can fill us in?

    ww.dailypaul.com/247491/proof-bar-attorneys-are-agents-of-a-foreign-power-and-most-of-them-know-it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh wonderful...perhaps Billy's sovereign cellmate will assert the right to make him his BITCH!

      Delete
    2. That page is seriously looney-tunes.

      I promise I am not "an agent of a foreign power"!

      I looked up the two cases cited right at the top of the article. Both citations are out-and-out lies.

      The first quotation (supposedly from the 1957 U.S. Supreme Court case Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, though the citation provided is wrong) is an utter fabrication; the Supreme Court never wrote what this crackpot claims it wrote in that case. The second cite (Sims v. Ahrens, which he misspells as "Aherns") is a 1925 case from the Supreme Court of Arkansas... and once again, the quotation is totally fabricated. Even if we cared what a court in Little Rock decided almost ninety years ago, it still didn't state what this doof dishonestly claims it did.

      Idiocy.

      Delete
  16. awwww...he's got a date(s)


    Bill Windsor Bambi and Connie, care to join me for a sandwich at Maid-Rite?
    Yesterday at 2:16pm · Edited · 4

    Mary Deneen Hope Maid-Rite is better than a MIssoula Oscar Meyer Bolonga Munchausen"s by proxy!
    Yesterday at 5:12pm · Edited

    Bambi Jensen Most definitely! Take care Bill!!!!
    Yesterday at 2:46pm · 1

    Damir Juric Bill, please check your e-mail and confirm.

    ReplyDelete
  17. At DC event B.W. told someone close to me and credible that he was looking at men's photos and profiles on dating/singles sites! So maybe he's homo in the closet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no...you mean sending him to the pen would be like throwing tar baby into the briar patch?

      Delete
    2. Apparently, yep.

      Winston Windsor

      Delete
  18. These are the comments that make me want to YACK! "Christ Like?"

    Mollie Malone We are here for you, Bill! Remember that Christ, too, was put on Trial by "Haters"... We Love Ya! God Bless You for being Christ-like!!
    3 hours ago

    ReplyDelete
  19. IMHO, the above image shows the only CROSS with which Windsor will ever be associated!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can i get that "to go" Sluggo? Do you take paypal? I have a house I want to decorate in Georgia by Friday.

      Thanks.

      Delete
  20. K, this is a video I just made, prolly one of my better videos

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw5TLGEXbeE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I rest my case!" hahaha Now he's going to modify his order to include how he's not delusional.

      Did you notice he also insisted no woman ever sat on his lap? Billy, STOP yer lying ole fella!

      http://oi47.tinypic.com/2cdyjus.jpg

      Delete
    2. Loved it Brannon. It's fricken spot on perfect.

      And if he does put it in now, unless he undergoes a Psych eval, he can't simply say he isn't delusional, and that's proof. And if he does undergo one, it will prove he is.

      This dude has a dark soul, he's cold and dead inside, and spews evil. I have never witnessed so much twistedness unfold in such a short time. (Still stuck on the Christ Like comment from last night, and he didn't dispute it)

      Delete
  21. Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday to you! Happy Birthday our beautiful Minister of Alpacaganda. Happy Birthday toooooooooo youuuuuuuuu!

    ~~ Luffs & giggle snorts ~~

    http://oi46.tinypic.com/6i8f1k.jpg

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xpeami317s

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-tvt0Zgcyc&playnext=1&list=PLA50DCDC52D0E0CF7&feature=results_main

    ReplyDelete
  22. If Allie needs another affidavit from a Windsor victim I'd be glad to send her one.

    C.S.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I quite like reading through a post that can make people think.

    Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!


    My blog healthy waist to height ratio

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.