Thursday, January 23, 2014

The Windsor of Oz



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
The scene in that movie at the end is so perfect to where we see Bill at this point.  The curtain has been pulled back, everyone can see he is just a crazy old man trying to play god, but he still keeps acting as if his cover isn't blown.  More analogies for that movie is that the lemmings are to follow the Lawless American brick road and never take one step off it.  And they do this to see their wizard, why?  Well because....because of the wonderful things he does none of which any of them can be give an example. Why is the Oz great?  Because they said he is, and he said he is, no more verification needed.

So the very public figure and man who gave the response to the State of the Union address on behalf of his political party http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvbRfbI6Fhk, thinks he can play district attorney as well. This was posted by Bill back on the 7th of this month:

Bill Windsor- By the way, any Joey who would like to get a release from the lawsuit should contact me with all the info they have. I am willing to give one more release to someone who would rather spill the beans to me than go through this litigation. All Joeys should be aware that I am asking that each Joey be held jointly and severally liable for the damages. That means, Curtis Butler and Brannon Bridge and Megan Van Zelfden and all the other people who have posted defamation on Joeylisalittlekid.blogspot.com will owe the full amount of the damage award. Consider this like a plea bargain...here's your chance for a get out of Bankruptcy Free Card. And guess what, a judgment of this type is not dischargable in bankruptcy, so you will owe me forever and ever and ever. 6 minutes ago · Like

Ok, for like the 20th time now, Megan has nothing to do with this blog, and never has. But beyond that, he actually says the words "consider this like a plea bargain", he is playing DA and making his extortion offers public. Then he goes on to respond to his precious "Susan" with this little titbit.

Bill Windsor Thanks, Susan. Nice to see you on the right side. I anticipate that Joeyisalittlekid will default, and I doubt that Google will answer the lawsuit for them. I detailed a lot of the facts in the lawsuit simply so they have to respond to each point. Disclosures have been served, and Requests for Admissions should be ready tomorrow, to include a digital copy of every article and comment that has ever appeared on their site. 10 minutes ago · Like

Notice how he is bragging about how he intentionally got vexatious with his filling so that Google would want no part of the Windsor of Oz. His filings are just too much for Google to deal with and because of that he will roll them. Then, as of last night we got more attempts at intimidating Google from Bill.


GOOGLE ATTORNEYS AGREE TO CONFERENCE CALL WITH BILL WINDSOR ON JANUARY 23, 2014...TO DISCUSS COOPERATION ON EXPOSING JOEYISALITTLEKID.BLOGSPOT.COM USERS, ETC.
The attorneys for Google have been very cooperative. My sense is that they don't want to be the one to pay tens of millions for all the defamation, stalking, and crimes perpetrated on their BlogSpot website.
I have given them a specific list of tings that I want, and they were served yesterday with several hundred document requests that will expose the identities and/or IP addresses of all the users on the Joeys site and other BlogSpot sites.
I can't wait. 17 people like this.
Ahhhh, the good ole blackmail Google approach, its gotta work right? They better play ball with Bill and give him the "several hundred document requests" he has sent them or if they don't watch out they will be at the mercy of this vexatious litigant known as Bill Windsor in the form of a named defendant. Thats right, this is Windsor's world where even Google is at the mercy of his legal skills.

116 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I'm so glad you are finding ways to amuse yourself with free speech. Too bad you don't understand that it's that kind of behavior that has caused other people to be dragged into a never ending court mess.

      Or, maybe you do understand...

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I know you better than you know yourself. Yep, you can say anything you like, just like Bill does. That doesn't make it right. And your behavior is a big deal when it affects the lives of others who have nothing to do with you exercising your rights to be foul mouthed and mean for your own enjoyment.

      Other than it's too windy, the day is great. Hope yours is the same.

      Delete
    4. Allie- I'd go with Primate Fornicator. Sounds a little more "astute". Although in this situation. Monkey fucker works as well.

      Delete
    5. Primate Fornicator....I feel a tee shirt coming on.

      Delete
    6. So can I call bill a monkey fucker too? Without getting sued? OH JOY! Monkeeeeeeeeeeee fuckaaaaaaaaaa.....you. Bill Windsor. You do "it" with monkeys.
      Thanks my friend. That just made my day.

      Delete
    7. seriously, grow up. There is enough that Bill has done or said or posted that you don't need to act like this. SMH

      If you want to be taken seriously in life, you should learn to use grownup words. Just because you can say something doesn't make it right.

      If you just want to call people names like the above, take it elsewhere, please. It's not funny, it's just childish and lame.

      Delete
    8. True, but the fact that you people do the exact same thing yet are somehow more grown-up, and seem to get all judgmental when others do it, IS funny. Just my opinion of course.

      Delete
    9. Really? So its only ok when people you like call names and make fun of ppl? Good thing we don't give a monkey Fuck about what you think of us then, right Pallie Overit? Lol. If I cared I'd go through the past comments and pick out aaaaalllll the childish names, but....I don't.
      Is Petunia "lame" for calling Marty a Douche Canoe? Cause I think that was pretty awesome too. Yappy has had some good ones as well.
      How bout pig fucker?
      Is that acceptable?

      Delete
    10. I stand firm on Marty IS a Douche Canoe ©!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    11. The problem is, Trooth, that some people don't seem to realize there is a difference between stating an opinion with satire or rhetoric and making accusations, like a statement of fact, about someone's sexual habits. It's crossing that line that has given Bill fuel. Those of us that can and do complete a sentence and express a thought without name calling and profanity don't appreciate those who can't very much. A lot of people are being blamed for the poor behavior of others. It's not like I haven't spoken up about this to other people before - the behavior is objectionable, it's just not the right and I will continue to speak up about it.

      Oceans is right about the name calling. I am truly sorry for calling you & Allie idiots. I should have said "in my opinion, you are acting like idiots".

      Delete
    12. That's ok. In my opinion, hypocrisy runs rampant in this bakery. Lol. And Petunia, I heart the poo outta you. You, are by far, thee most hilarious Alpaca I have ever commented in a blog about a boob with.

      Delete
    13. ***addendum***
      In my opinion. Please add that to every single Petunia-ism ever typed, uttered, repeated or thought. Thank you.

      For example: In my opinion, me, Petunia, do hereby believe with my whole entire self, that Marty Prehn, aka Aagent DoucheCanoe is a mother neglecting, mooch, that no one on God's Green Earth deserves to be stuck with &/or near, EXCEPT Bill Windsor. A lot. Like, uh, FOREVER. Like, uh, peas & carrots, together, like pond & scum, like shit & stink together, forEVER.
      Anyone fortunate enough to have an elderly mother to care for oughta considerate themselves blessed & they should kill or die trying to make her as heathy & happy as they possibly can. In my opinion, Aagent DoucheCanoe should Eat Shit and Fall Back (c), real hard. Twice. On a pine cone.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    14. >consider instead of >considerate
      Autocorrect ASSumed

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    15. Amen!!!! You are right, as usual.
      Allie could give the same exact speech and I'd bet my right eye, certain Mikes would pop up almost immediately to comment something hateful and rude. It's ok though. I dont think it bothers her much.

      Delete
    16. like Khaki Jackson fake profile ...... Hmm NBTD ..... that show Allie true colors

      Delete
    17. @Anon2:01pm, huh? I'm looking both ways & squinting.
      I don't get what you mean.
      You gotta help me here.
      Try again?

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    18. Khaki? Tan? No, no, no, I don't like tan. Denim Jackson. Blue, now there's a color I like. Old faded jeans blue.

      Delete
    19. Is the anon trying to say that Allie is Khaki or Nothing? I'm confused.

      Delete
    20. That Anon? Only hopes to be a monkey f*cker. She's under qualified.

      Waves at the brown spot on Snoozie's knotty nose ~ ~ ~ it's almost daylight, back in your box!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    21. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    22. I was responding to Anon/SnoozieTroll ~

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    23. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    24. Spin again, Anon:)
      You be ASSuming, again. As usual, you are lurking during those wee hours of the night...those hours when real people, with real lives are happily tucked snuggly in slumber with their loved ones. Your insomnia, your many failures & shortcomings in your life combined with deafening loneliness lead you to obscure little blogs. Your endless nights of trolling the internet leave you haggard & hateful.
      Life IS Good, here, with me, in AlpacaGanda & here on the porch of Ginger's.
      Yawn, stretch, sip of fresh brewed coffee, sunshine peeking out. Yup. Everything's real good.
      Daylight's here! Back in your box!

      ℗ ❥ ♛

      Delete
    25. ^ "just know"

      Delete
  2. Perfect analogy, the great & powerful Oz.

    I was just watching a video posted on the last thread. Funny, Bill claims that his videos have been used by judges to right the wrongs of corruption. But I am unaware of any follow up story posted by Bill or anyone else to support his claim.

    Bill makes serious accusations against a DA in Utah and a police department in TX (says they are murdering inmates). Bill even takes credit, laughingly, for writing a story that he says got a lot of attention and probably prevented election of the DA to judge.

    How does anybody in their right mind think it's OK to say and publicly broadcast such things based on hearsay and gossip? How does any sane person think it's OK to make unsupported accusations then stalk, harass and intimidate those who question and want the facts?

    The people Bill accuses aren't stalking, harassing, threatening or trying to intimidate him. Or suing him for what he thinks and says. Yep, Bill has a right to say whatever he wants about whomever he wants. It appears that the only explanation for Bill's behavior is an emotional or psychiatric disorder that prevents him from understanding others have the same rights to free speech.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ68Za_LEGo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree NBTDT, in Bill's world, it's all okay if he says or does something. Stalking people is cool if he is the one doing it.

      Anyone who does not agree with him ends up on a hate list, and he goes so far as to ask others to help with finding information about them. As recently as today. He can't just ignore it, he has to file a lawsuit. In my opinion, the endless(and yes they are endless as he has been busy for years doing this in courtrooms across America since his Maid of the Mist suits) are just the excuse he needs to avoid having to come up with a product he has promised- the Movie.

      I can't find even one example of how his activities have benefited a single lemming's case, or done anything of substance to change anything. The only success he has had is corralling a bunch of conspiracy enthusiasts and very sad people who have been ruled against in a courtroom.

      Just because you did not get what you wanted in court, is not an indicator of corruption. Just like not getting all positive comments from the Internet is not a sign of conspiracy. And when you hold yourself out to be the head of a political Revolutionary Party, and a movement like Lawless America, or you run for public office like Bill has done, you make yourself a public figure.

      Delete
    2. Well, nobody here is such an idiot they don't realize you are harassing and defaming people here with malice.

      Delete
    3. For clarity: my post at 4:52 was in response to Snoozan, who is no longer here.

      Delete
  3. I can't understand why Bill is wasting his time asking google to give him our IP's. All he had to do was ask Marty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry Cooky, I hate to break it to you, but Marty is one dress size too small to qualify for J. Edgar Junior G-man status.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Take it from you...because I am part you, sort of...wink...wink.

      Delete
  5. So Allie must think she is off the hook this is case number 2 she is named in now. Guess your attorney is no longer working and your hoping the case will go onto the dismissal docket to be thrown out for no hearings. Great plan. Must be you have no money when you said to others money is no issue. I knew you could not afford your attorney who really has an issue here personally. A republican attorney who is going after as guy who has many teaparty peeps following him. I would say that you picked the wrong guy for the job. It's unethical for him to be a Fox News attorney contributor and also be an attorney going after tea party constitutionalists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Facepalm. You are putting waaaay too much thought into this. LOL.

      Delete
    2. Thought? I think you meant hot gas, and I haven't seen that much hot gas since the Hindenburg. Oh the insanity!

      Delete
    3. I can see why Allie thinks she is off the hook. Except for losing custody of her daughter, she hasn't been held accountable for anything she says or does. The whole point of Allie making sure individuals here (who had nothing to do with Bill or his "movie") get wrapped up in a never ending law suit like the one she started for herself is to deflect from her own failures and bad choices.

      It's curious to me that Allie has come back so strong and vocal. I can't imagine, if she is still represented, that her attorney would "lighten up" about the statements she's made re: conspiracies and Bill's sex habits.

      Delete
    4. Well this is a first. Facepalm @ one of Nothing's comments. Up til now, my Facepalm-ing had been reserved for only the idiots. Welcome, Nothing.

      Delete
    5. Pssssss....Allie.....
      I don't think they like you. Lolololol!

      Delete
    6. The trailer trash whore who fucks anything that walks and talks calls someone an idiot? so butthurt

      Delete
    7. Hey! Don't talk about Nothing like that! You don't even know her.

      Delete
    8. BTW, the above comment was meant to be funny. No disrespect intended @ Nothing in this one.

      Also, I do not think I'm off the hook or out of a lawsuit. I was referring above simply that I don't let it stress me like I used to. I don't waste my time reading the motions, I don't worry about losing, and it doesn't impact my defense. As far as I know, I'm still the defendant in an active lawsuit. It's just that I've learned that stressing over it makes no difference.

      Delete
    9. Gosh, I guess since I answered to part, I should answer to the rest. Nothing, I have legal custody and care of all my children, I'm not Windsors informant, the monkey fucker thing was not a statement about Bills sexual activities, and my attorney is aware of every word I type, including this blog. Hope that helps.

      Delete
    10. What you don't get is, most people here do not care about your personal details. It is your behavior and agenda that is at issue. You can waste all the bandwidth you want in attempting to explain, rationalize, justify or lie about it - doesn't change a thing.

      Hope that helps :)

      Delete
    11. I am laughing my idiot head off!!!! Lol!
      Geez!
      Calling someone a trailer trash whore must be different than monkey fucker. I just don't understand the rules here.
      Hey Als, how come these ppl are always pickin on you? Then, because Im your homie, they don't like me either. :-(
      I'm sorry pal, but I'm gonna have to break up with you. I want ppl to like me and I had no idea you lived in a trailer.
      Dealbreaker.

      Delete
    12. It's because I'm black, isn't it.

      Delete
    13. "What you don't get is, most people here do not care about your personal details" I wonder if "most of the people" on this blog are aware that Nothing is their spokeswoman.
      I do have a question for you though, Nothing, and since you speak for "most people" here, I hope you can answer." Those of us that can and do complete a sentence and express a thought without name calling and profanity don't appreciate those who can't very much."
      Is the profanity used by the Anon above "appreciated"? And Ms. Snodgrass, and Yappy seem to be well liked, even luffed by everyone here, including me, and they have both used their fair share of profanity. (I luff it). So, are the opinions you express after EVERY Allie comment just because you don't like Allie? And Boushie? I've seen some Anons post some pretty vulgar things on here without a peep from you, unless of course, you think the anon is Allie or Boushie. For example, "CUUUUUUNNNNNNNTTTTTT" One of One of EB's favorite nicknames for Susan, you never chastise her for her comments, yet, I posted a tinypic of a funny legal document I made concerning Mary D and Ticks and you wasted no time informing me that it was not funny or cute to make fun of Mary because she was mentally ill. Lol.
      Since then, there's been many, many funny comments making fun of Mary D, but since they weren't made by Allie or anyone that may be her friend, *crickets chirping*.
      This is not meant to be Bitchy, I would just like to know what "most people" heres answer is. And I broke up with Allie so you don't have to be hateful. :-)

      Delete
    14. It's not any different, IMO. Both statements are inappropriate. But the Anon that appears angry with Allie isn't trying to sue the rest of us for what Allie, Booshie & AMPP did. And the Anon is not pretending to be something s/he is not.

      Delete
    15. @ Trooth: I have never spoken for anybody but myself. As for the rest of what you said, if somebody has to explain the difference to you, you wouldn't understand it.

      Delete
    16. "What you don't get is, most people here do not care about your personal details"
      Youre quote, not mine.
      And of COURSE I don't understand!
      I'm an idiot!

      Delete
    17. So, can this be funny now?
      [IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/2z9guvl.jpg[/IMG]

      Delete
    18. @ Trooth: the people that were contributors here before Bill's ex pats found the blog have a different agenda. It's not about Allie any more than it was about the personal details of AMPP members. I know this because I was here.

      Delete
    19. And no, I do not think that is funny. It is mean spirited. Who did that? Booshie?

      Delete
    20. I understand that, but that wasn't my question.
      I'm an idiot so please take pity on me and have mercy.
      Why do you respond with strongly worded opinions when certain ppl post things but not others? Forget Allie. I'm not even asking about her anymore and she can take care of herself.
      Why would it be "cruel" and not funny when I post something satirical about Mary D but not when others do? Besides my personal friendship with Allie, my association with the Boob was a flash in the pan. I came to this blog to set the story straight and get the "trooth" out because my name was in it as well as my minor sons, and the Boob was tryin to bully me. That's over for me because the coyote never beats the road runner. Beep beep.
      I read now for entertainment purposes only because it is entertaining and I throw in a comment here and there because I am an idiot and cant help myself.
      So why am I different?
      Is it because Allie is black?
      Lol.
      Duty calls and I have a company to run.
      Again, not meant to be Bitchy, just wondering why.
      Keep bein awesome Mikes! Have a great day!

      Delete
    21. If I took exception to something you said, I felt you crossed a line. FYI: LMAO at Spec Agent O. Bese. Marty is fair game, he can control what he does/says and he's engaged us with the special agent stuff. Although I do not take exception to calling him 'fatty', you don't see me participating in the name calling or supporting it.

      Mary D has an illness, she is unable to control it. She is minding her own business to the best of her ability, she has not engaged us. Playing off her rants is one thing, attacking her is like kicking a sick puppy. And how would you like it if someone, even pretending, authorized a body cavity search for you?

      Delete
    22. I will attest to the fact that Nothing & I are good enough *friends* (take that however reader chooses) that I am well aware of how Nothing feels about, MaryD. After I took into consideration Nothing's words to me about MaryD? I realized Nothing is correct. I have been tacky about MaryD. Shame on me. MaryD can't help herself & Windsor ought to be ashamed of himself for giving her false hope & letting her think he gives a rat's furry ass about her...He does not (insert IMO here). I was just pondering her this morning, & I was thinking that now that he's fixed his FB page where no one can comment? she's probably really VERY kerfluffled. She uses those comment sections, that have been fodder for me & others, to vent what she truly believes has happened to her. That's sad, really very sad to me. She's isolated, desperate, & disturbed. Since I really gave her some long thought? I've tried not to be so tacky or snippy about MaryD. I mentioned her the other day & I was VERY serious that she, MaryD, should R U N away from all that is ala Windsor/LawlessAmerica!
      I try SO hard to find humor in everything I possibly can. The 'up' side or funny in the darkest of life's situations is what keeps me plodding along my path & the belief that it'll get better/easier someday. It/Life certainly could get worse...

      I still stand firm on my opinion of Aagent DoucheCanoe aka Marty the Mongoose Prehn. He is unworthy to breathe sewer treatment facility fumes, as far as I am concerned.

      (& yes, I am indebted to Ginger's cuss jar for a big chunk of change, I'll work harder on not incurring any more cuss jar debt & to use asterisks instead henceforth)

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    23. Well, don't get too excited, Nuffin...I'm far from reformed!

      Y'all gotta give a listen to this little diddy entitled "You're a DoucheCanoe" (cause you're not a Douche Sailboat)!! It is my new fav!

      Hey Aagent Marty!! where you be? I dedicate this to you!!

      ps. Not my boobage in the video.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0ef_q1_uoQ

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
  6. Hey Y'all! It's just been brought to my attention that today is National Pie Day.

    Too bad I didn't know it earlier in the day. If Bill is playing over by the court house, I would have invited him to celebrate with me. But my favorite pie place closes at 2 PM.

    http://www.piecouncil.org/Events/NationalPieDay/CelebrationIdeas

    ReplyDelete
  7. Whatttttt? I'm getting sued by some fat Pie dude I don't even know & have never said anything about ??????? I came to the clubhouse because "Special Agent Fatty" had a link to it on his page ... crying about the "Joey's". Knowing Marty to be a liar, stalker and pervert ... I commented on the posts pertaining to Marty, as he is a evil man who threatens many women. I have no clue who the pie dude is that's suing me ..only know Marty. Thanks to Marty I found the Joey's . The pie dude should get a clue and get rid of Marty who has brought many Joey's over here including myself with his whining & using the pie dude to grab attention to his crazy rants about the Joey's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He'd be wise to lose the special agent.

      Delete
    2. Calling him "special agent fatty" is childish and lame.
      DO IT AGAIN! Lol. What about "special agent O. Bese"?

      Delete
  8. Still no update on how that teleconference with Google went for Bill. Must not be good news. I guess they don't buy the "I am always right" Bill keeps telling everyone.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya...it makes sense they wouldn't buy Butthurt Billy's version of defamation law, but with $50+ Billion in cash, they can buy just about anything else. ;-)

      Delete
    2. Maybe it's taking a while to post so he can think how to make it sound like good news.

      Delete
    3. Bad news...I got lung cancer and they're going to have to remove a lung.

      Good News...I'll cut my smoking in half.

      Delete
  9. anyone that wants to see what is going on sort of, can go to Countyinfosearch.com and read there, however, you can't read the documents, however if you are in Ellis County, you can read them at The District Clerks office, on a computer they have setup, as I was reading one, Bill wanted to get a TPO, and will couple days later, he puts a notice of withdrawn, and turns out The clerk told him, he would have to hire personal service, and he didnt have the moeny for it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the info! As for the TPO, too bad Billy didn't have the Larry, Curly and Moeny for it.

      Delete
  10. oh ya, haha, so when you go there click >>>Ellis County District Clerk>>>then login (the username and pass are default ones)>>>Then hit Civil Case History>>> then for cause put in 88611, and it brings it up..
    this is at countyinforsearch.com

    ReplyDelete
  11. Allie, in my opinion you're a heartless conniving bitch who's a female replica of Bill. I know you'll take it as the greatest compliment of all time so you're welcome in advance. I feel incredibly sad for your children, having to live through hell with mother like you. Can't imagine how some of your kids will turn out but I'm betting you'll blame CPS and everyone else but yourself.

    Sounds like a familiar subject here.

    Bill? Screw you and your lies and games.

    .

    Bill Windsor My sense was right. They (Google) seem very happy to cooperate in providing all the identity information. They just want a release.
    8 hours ago · Like · 3


    Does this man not realize we can see how Google responded? I think the next book or movie about Bill is HOW MANY WAYS A CON MAN WIlL LIE OUT OF HIS ASS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As Ginger's awesome article points out, those he is conning with his lies, aren't allowed to step off his yellow brick road. (or they get sued) So, they only go by what the Almighty Billiarzd of Oz says. Forget the court documents in any case, if it doesn't come directly from Oz, it's void.

      He can say that Google is bowing to his every demand, and they are his bestest buddies. The lemmings will eat it up. However, as we have all seen in the past, it won't be long before they are being called corrupt, aiding the conspiracy cover-up, damaging his "revolution", and interfering with the goals to "Take their Country Back."

      No one disagrees with Windbag, it is not allowed in his world. Unfortunately not everyone was privy to know this ahead of time. I am sure it was written in a disclaimer they all got when they sent in their one cent to join his "revolution" but that's just a guess.

      Delete
    2. exactly, it wont be long before he says they are thumbing their multi-billion dollar corrupt noses at him. He's a broken record, its the only way he can play it

      Delete
    3. So true.
      First comes the fake flattery, his feeble attempt at brown nosing, then he will (as history proves) unleash the wrath of Windsor on them.

      I believe Facebook is experiencing this now. Maybe the Google attorneys should hop on over to the San Mateo court records and read up on what to expect.

      Delete
    4. I also think the Google attorneys need to read up on the John Margetis connection to Windsor, since, well, they already went down that road.

      Delete
    5. It doesn't look like Snoozie is helping him either. He might should have taken her up on her offer. Then again, maybe this way is better...

      Delete
  12. Snippets of what appears to be the Sovereign takeover aka Lawless America. (starting one lawsuit at a time, compiling names...has it already begun?)

    "So, we won't wait until we are in control to put these criminals on trial, we will start next year."

    "My name is Bill Windsor. If you don’t know who I am, you should. I am leading a new American revolution, and we have formed a new political party – The Revolutionary Party. It is our goal to become the dominant party in America, formed from the 99% of us who currently have little or no power."

    " To join the new Revolutionary Party, send one penny with your name, address, telephone numbers, and email address to B. Windsor, PO Box 681236, Marietta, GA 30068. We're looking for 70 million pennies."

    "We intend to take control of every state legislature, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the U.S. Senate. We intend to elect every state governor and the President of the United States. When we accomplish these goals, we will be able to retroactively take the steps necessary to validate actions that we take in the interim."

    Article titled "Plans announced to bring Criminal Charges against Every Corrupt Government Official in America . Saturday, 27 October 2012 00:00 William M. Windsor"

    http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1202%3Aplans-announced-to-bring-criminal-charges-against-every-corrupt-government-official-in-america&catid=133%3Alawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "When we accomplish these goals, we will be able to retroactively take the steps necessary to validate actions that we take in the interim."

      Isn't that sort of like, they'll just make up the rules as they go and fix the laws later to make it seem right?

      Delete
    2. Sounds more like if they break any current laws (or whatever) to make their goals happen, they will just grant each other retroactive immunity, to validate why they did what they did. Like, never mind us, we are going to do what we want, regardless.

      Delete
    3. *yes* to you too NB, and adding ^^^

      Delete
    4. Yeah. And I'm wondering, am I part of the 99% without power? If so, seems like nothing much would change when they accomplish their goals.

      Delete
    5. @ 4:59: I just read your comments again. You pretty much summed up the militia rhetoric too.

      Delete

  13. "to validate why they did what they did. Like, never mind us, we are going to do what we want, regardless. "

    sort of a Windsor mantra right there.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lookie! Another Lemming getting all Vexi!

    http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  15. So a person does not win their case appeals it until the high court gets mad and will never accept defeat, the next thing is sue and sue and then what go on some take over the place guns a blazing in the name of their opinion of the constitution. Ridiculous. Bill and others seem to be big baby's they need to move on to something that doesn't effect the general public or doesn't endanger lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. They all fail and instead of just accepting their medicine, learning from it and move on, they spend the rest of their lives lashing out like a 2 year old

      Delete
    2. Bawahahahahahahahaha giggle snicker snort!!
      Those fumes offa the cesspool have Snoozie spinning! Her Saturday night obviously was another disappointment:/
      Ginger? You nailed it months ago. Your blog OWNS her! She's like a moth to a flame. Can you blame her, though? You've seen her teenie endeavor, her little hall monitor version aka Susan's Party of None!
      Bawahahahahaha!

      Waving good Sunday morning to ALL!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    3. Got to thinking about Gingersnap's comments - I was reminded of this song. When you go to court, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose and sometimes you just settle. That's just the way it works. I agree, it appears these guys didn't emotionally evolve past the 2 year old 'no' stage.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_rbjg2k6cI

      Delete
    4. Exactly. Someone is going home mad. Now, what will these SC's do, when everyone is an SC because they got rid of all the "haters"? They can't all win, they can't even get along out there with their revolution ideas, plots to take over, treason all around. SMDH

      Delete
  16. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/courtney-love-wins-twitter-defamation-673972

    Take that Butthurt Billy and Snoozan!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Snoozan, it amazes me how you can continue to laugh your ass off when it's clear your head is so deeply imbedded into it, it's acting like a button through your pelvis cavity. GingerSnap has told you repeatedly to cease and desist from posting here, yet you continue; why is that? By that fact and your own words makes you a CYBERSTALKER and CO-CONSPIRATOR and a ginormous HYPOCRITE. You think you're smart enough to play both sides? Fine.
      You may just find yourself defending against BOTH sides, especially if Google submits to Windsor's discovery. Seriously, do you really think you're real ID won't be outed and that you're immune to counter-suits?
      DREAM ON.

      Delete
    2. think you're real ID--> think your real ID

      Delete
    3. Good point, Anon - as the entire blog has been downloaded (allegedly) and Susan is in Bill's list of haters, he has Susan's posts too. Susan tried to lead a charge for others to post Bill's history so others just tuning in would know the 'truth'. How does she figure she's excluded from Bill's suit? She's excused just because she got mad when nobody wanted to play her game?

      (Rhetorical questions, Snoozan - not looking for response. In fact, please don't respond. What you have to say doesn't matter.)

      Delete
  17. I was browsing the You Tube videos that popped up after watching another video someone sent me and saw the videos linked below. The 60 Minutes video was posted by a SovCit, labeled "CBS hit piece". Most of this we already know but I posted it because LMAO at SovCit "expert" interviewed , she says "you really can't believe in what they peddle unless you turn off the common sense switch". And they interview a SovCit I haven't heard of before, Alfred Adask, who says the 2nd amendment is so we can shoot our own politicians, judges & police - the threat of violence is required.

    The other 2 links are SovCits in court. It appears they were posted to show how frustrated judges can become with SovCit rhetoric. I'm wondering why these guys even showed up in court if they believe the court has no power.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F_pY47hE5U (60 Minutes)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06VzxxDTnB8 (Mountain Man)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55pjFKalOVc (Keith - not Keith Thompson, just Keith)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow. It is surprising I had not heard of Adask, he apparently works out of the Dallas area. He ran for office of US Senator with the Constitution Party, along with Jon Roland who was running for office with the Libertarian Party.

      It appears Roland (of Lawless America) and Adask are pals. Roland wrote an article for Adask's publication and they have endorsed the others work.

      http://www.voiceofnorthamerica.com/txnational_campaign.html

      http://freedom-school.com/al-adask/vol-7-1.pdf (see page 57)

      http://www.constitution.org/cs_event.htm (Roland lists Adask as a regular event)

      http://www.constitution.org/cmt/testimonials.htm (Adask praises Roland)



      Here is Adask's plan for his party:

      http://www.mygodgivenrights.com/PDF/The_Plan.pdf

      Delete
    2. Oh wait...I have heard of Adask before, just didn't connect him to SovCits. I found a law suit Adask vs Adask while researching Bill one day. I was curious about it as appears to be a divorce but Alfred as plaintiff filed a complaint under RICO (no PACER account, so didn't look further for info).

      Turns out, old Al sued his ex wife, her attorney and judge under RICO for an order of child support. Which he didn't pay and got arrested.

      http://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txndce/3:2007cv01531/170428

      Words spoken like a true SovCit in this plea for help:

      "I'd like the system to know that my situation is being Watched by people all over the country. I'd like the people who are watching my situation to call, fax and or email a question to the sheriff here and this is the question, 'Is it true that the living man, Alfred Adask, is being held as fiduciary for a crime allegedly committed by the person ALFRED ADASK with a DOB of 4/21/45 ?'"

      http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Alfred-Adask/10847223

      http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=6459

      Delete
    3. There are just so many of these people it's hard to keep track. But, they all seem to be tied together one way of another. While checking into Rod Class I came across quite a few groups he's associated with, besides Lawless, and cross referencing names with William Windsor or Lawless America, it's quite interesting.

      It appears to me now, why Snoozan was all flustered at how Windsor went sideways out the gate, let his ego take over by focusing a bit too much on growing himself, instead of the "Revolution"...(but still jumps in to defend his right to get vexi) is because she still sports the same SC allegiance. Pretty sure she's still wrapped up with the major movement or Revolution of SC's based on her obsession with this blog. Found a woman who could be "Susan Harbison" because she spouts all the same kind of crap. Her name is Angela Stark.

      Angela has her own talkshoe show called "My private Audio." http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=39904&cmd=tc

      She follows and interviews the assorted SC's. Fully supporting their take over she's just waiting for everyone to "wake up". She also has a blog, but don't go there without a proxy, she's tracking IP's. http://www.myprivateaudio.com/ (Oh, and she will also charge you in gold and silver if you take any of her stuff and repost. LOL- feel free to donate to her page too. I didn't see any claim to a non profit, but then again I didn't look)

      While searching I came across a few people who don't care too much for Angela. One being Clayton R Davis. They had a heated exchange, because she wouldn't post what he wanted, and he said she was too rigid and wanted things her own way. LOL who does that sound like?

      So, when the SC's all have the same mind frames, but can't even get along with each other, who wins in a civil grand jury?

      Some more fun SC's to watch include
      Paula Gloria and her hubby Joe Barton
      http://www.youtube.com/user/paulagloria/videos

      Clayton R Douglas
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll4CzHURao0

      Delete
    4. Oh here is part 2 of Clayton. At a little over 2 min, is that David Schied trying to call in? LOL
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypTuadLbZ1o

      Delete
    5. Thx, Ninja. Those were fun to watch but I couldn't take much of Clayton.

      Remember Steven Erickson? He was the guy so worried about Bill's disappearance he did a video. Steven follows Bill & Al Adask. In his 'testimony' to Bill: Steven says he's all for citizen grand juries, he seems to think CT cops are killing people and making it look like natural causes.

      And geez, even Bill's own loyalist see the truth. Steven said this on his blog: "Some people who have contacted Bill Windsor are, and will always be mentally ill."

      http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2013/12/william-windsor-murdered-or-jailed-for.html

      http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Legal-Challenge-to-Police-by-Steven-G-Erickson-110920-420.html

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmoNZUzBUb8

      Delete
    6. Oh wow. Here's another Lawless America 'nobody' partnered up with Alfred Adask. Ron Branson - he's the jail4judges guy.

      http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin
      archive.cgi?noframes%3Bread=30832

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFI5K-YyuTc

      Ron advertises his .org on a SovCit site for resources - Adask is listed as is William Duff (Continental Congress 2009), Bob Hurt (court watcher buddy of D. Schied) & Clive Broustred (copper card guy, see March '13 posts).

      http://www.3wisemenessentials.com/commerce_teachers.html

      Delete
    7. Oh, and Angela Stark's connection to Ron Branson.

      https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/grandjury/-xNyiPf2ZoE/21n4w9BTyEUJ

      Delete
    8. Windsor posted a picture, and wrote a mess of blah, blah, inciting more anti govt. rhetoric and riling up the bored lemmings. One part caught my attention, as did some comments there after. How to incite the SC's... throw in the word "Murder."

      "Lawless America...The Movie will SHOCK our fellow Americans as most do not have a clue that the government can come in and decide they are no longer the parents of their children.

      Please have your friends, enemies, neighbors, co-workers, relatives, and victims everywhere go to www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica and watch some of the horror stories."

      Ok, knowing Windsor, there are two things I bet he is trying to accomplish here. One, is pulling back the lemmings who had one foot out the door, and who support the other actual documentaries that just came out, (that aren't actually anti-govt) and Two, (the biggie) drumming up business for the "Revolution" by showing one sided stories to angry, anti America Americans. (One minute he says the movie is all but dead, the next he says it will shock and awe you...righty-o-then)

      Now on to the comments from assorted lemmings. "Stand up to Tyranny," "We all should be outraged," "You are so right Bill," "...so add attempted murder to your criminal violations list of charges!," "We have to do something," and "this is what we do now" http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/

      Ah, there it is. Forget the blah, blah, just find the hot button. "Murder" and the loss of your rights, followed by the call to go watch the videos on YouTube so they can get more members to join their "Lawless America Revolution." That's what this is all about.

      Delete
    9. Drumming up hits to appease his insatiable appetite for attention.

      Delete
    10. Murder? Here's Bill Windsor's own words regarding murder.

      I found this here:
      http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/146145899/html5

      William M. Windsor and LawlessAmerica, proposed legislation that will fix many of the problems.

      138. The felony murder rule shall be abolished. [The felony murder rule operates as a matter of law upon proof of the intent to commit a felony to relieve the prosecution of its burden of proving intent to kill, which is a necessary element of murder. The intention to commit a felony does not equal the intention to kill, nor is the intention to commit a felony, by itself, sufficient to establish a charge of murder. The felony murder rule erodes the relation between criminal liability and moral culpability in that it punishes all homicides in the commission, or attempted commission, of the proscribed felonies, whether intentional, unintentional, or accidental, without proving the relation between the homicide and the perpetrator's state of mind. Under the felony murder rule, the defendant's state of mind is irrelevant. Because intent is a characterization of a particular state of mind with respect to a killing, felony murder bears little resemblance to the offense of murder except in name. First-degree murder is an arbitrary assignment. Holding one or many criminally liable for the bad results of an act which differs greatly from the intended results is based on a concept of culpability which is totally at odds with the general principles of jurisprudence. It is fundamentally unfair and in violation of basic principles of individual criminal culpability to hold one felon liable for the unforeseen and un-agreed to results of another felon's action. The basic rule of culpability is further violated when felony murder is categorized as first-degree murder because all other first-degree murders (carrying equal punishment) require a showing of premeditation, deliberation and willfulness, while felony murder only requires a showing of intent to do the underlying felony. The purpose of creating degrees of murder is to punish with increased severity the more culpable forms of murder, but an accidental killing during the commission or attempted commission of a felony is punished more severely than a second-degree murder. The felony murder rule can be used by prosecutors in a manner so as to cause grossly disproportionate sentencing, depending on the circumstances of each individual case. The felony murder rule is unconstitutional because presumption of innocence is thrown to the winds. The prosecution needs only to prove intent to commit the underlying felony; that done, first degree-murder becomes part and parcel of the underlying felony because intent to commit murder does not have to be proved. The felony murder rule is probably unconstitutional because in some cases it violates the Eighth Amendment: cruel and unusual punishment, grossly disproportionate to the crime(s) actually committed. The felony murder rule holds unequally involved parties equally accountable and punishable. Again, cruel and unusual punishment if you're only the lookout for a robber who happens to kill in the process of the robbery. The felony murder rule violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process because no defense is allowed on the charge of first-degree murder, only the underlying felony. The felony murder rule bears no rational relationship or equity in its two penalties, with the penalties of other murder laws, including, at times, the charge of first-degree murder.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    11. Thanks for posting this Petunia. Windsor's legal analysis is deeply ignorant and deeply flawed. What he fails to understand is felony murder gets its underpinnings from vicarious liability doctrine in tort law.

      "The felony murder rule holds unequally involved parties equally accountable and punishable."

      This is an profoundly ignorant statement which goes to the very core of Windsor's hypocrisy when one considers he's against felony murder because he considers it inherently inequitable, yet he is attempting to sue EVERY SINGLE PERSON who has posted on this site.

      Delete
    12. 1) Oops...this is an --> this is a

      2) Note Windsor is asserting all the posters on this and other blogs conspired to harm him and he thus intends to hold each one of them individually and severally libel.

      Delete
    13. Yeah, thanks P ~. And 9:46, very good point.

      All I could think while reading Bill's statement is, isn't that the job of a jury to decide all these questions and issues? I can't see how the presumption of innocence is thrown to the winds. Bill's lack of faith in law enforcement is also showing. The prosecution of innocent people isn't common enough to convince me that the felony murder rule is misapplied.

      Delete
    14. Oh, there's sooooooo many #s after 138!!! The ones prior to 138 are some facepalmers, too.

      Ignorantly nauseating.

      It's a virtual nugget mine over on the Sribd link.

      Delete
    15. he came up with this because some of the 'nobodies' have family in jail under felonies which included murder by a co-defendant. This was suggested by the lemmings when he asked for changes to the legal system IIRC.

      They think it is unfair if you both get charged for the murder that occurs when robbing a store, or kidnapping someone, if you aren't holding the gun. SMH

      Delete
    16. All of the suggested 'changes' & 're-structuring' is so absurdly bassackwards!
      I've read it twice today & I simply cannot believe ANYONE could or would support this snit!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    17. careful about reading it too much, it can make you ill. I read it through once, and it took days to forget it all. Be kind to yourself, stop now. LOL

      Delete
  18. Waving~

    Did I tell y'all about my new favorite YouTube singer & my new fav song of hers?
    She is so cute! And, her tune? It is so catchy!
    I've been happily humming & have actually burst out in song several times!
    Go take a listen & a peek!
    If you are the teeniest bit drooped? It will perk you right up & make you giggle snort!
    I had previously dedicated it exclusively to Aagent Alphabet-soup spewer, but I'm taking that back! It's just too good solely for him! I'm hereby gifting it to ALL the DoucheCanoes across the universe!

    "You're a DoucheCanoe....you're not a DoucheSailBoat, 'cause I enjoy sailboats! So you're a DoucheCanoe!"

    ***Waving*** ℗ ♛ ❥

    ReplyDelete