Thursday, January 30, 2014

You've Got MY Mail



We have chronicled many times just how stupid Bill Windsor is.  But I have to say, this one takes the cake. After threatening Google with adding them to his frivolous lawsuit, Bill asked Google to provide him with this:

2.  All documents relating or referring to, or evidencing, reflecting, or constituting communication to, from, or information about names, screen names, registration information, and server log information for users of Gmail who have emailed the Plaintiff at nobodies@att.net, williamwindsor@bellsouth.net, or bill@lawlessamerica.com from January 1, 2012 to present.

Thats right, Bill can't keep up with his emails, so Google could you help a brother out here, and while you are at it tell me everything you know about anyone who has emailed me in the last two years.  That is all.....well not really I have 84 more requests just like this.  Windsor continues to waive his vexatious wand of paper terrorism at any and everyone he can think of.  But one thing keeps coming up again and again...he is too dumb and lazy to ever remember any details.  Lets just throw everything out there and make the court sort it out while I just claim its a nationwide conspiracy.  Oh, and then we have another short and sweet request to Google:

3.  All documents relating or referring to, or evidencing, reflecting, or constituting communication to, from, or information about names, screen names, registration information, and IP activity for users of YouTube who have accessed www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica from January 1, 2012 to present

You see, under some of these videos that I have put up where I single out judges and call them corrupt and guilty of treason, some people click the "thumbs down" button and some even leave meanie comments about me on these public pages.  I am Bill Windsor and I make the laws and I consider that defamation and I want everyone's personal info so I can stalk and harass them for unliking my youtube page.  So you better pony up that info Google, or you too will be on the receiving end of my sensationally frivolous lawsuit.  Oh and fyi....I'm loaded just in case you want a piece of my pie for legal fees.

72 comments:

  1. Exactly.


    (And the tags on this one crack me up)

    ReplyDelete
  2. The funny part is, he is also going after some of his current lemmings. They are listed in his court docs too. Maybe they should just offer up all their own info to him so that he won't have to work so hard to get all vexi on them too.

    Seems he is angry at any lemmings who have ever posted here(that means people like you Nancy). He is hoping that someone like Google will sort out that data for him, since he won't want to have to work that hard to itemize it all himself.

    The biggest flaw in his whole list of demands is that he can't specifically itemize what he wants this info for. It's a giant fishing expedition for information he has no rights to. SMH

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, really? He wants the IP's of all the people who have watched his youtube videos? Wow, that sounds like an invasion of privacy. How many people would stop watching youtube all together if they knew their information could be obtained, and by anyone who simply wants that information, without guarantee what that information would be used for.

    Windsor has made his vindictive history well known, in that he purchased domain names of people he wanted to intimidate, slander, and harass, including Judges, some of them he has actually created websites doing just that. The king of domain hoarding, and his son, (of whom his company Alcatraz shows the domains were purchased under) want more names to add? Is that what he is doing? Really?

    I think at this point Windsor should just buy up all the US phone books and go from there. I mean, it seems to me that he believes everyone has at one point or another said or thought something meanine about him, considering he believes that everyone knows, or should know about him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt he would know what to do with all that data if they gave it to him. He wants server logs, and IP addresses and user names. Names that aren't even connected to emails. IP's through different ISP's. Emails that were written to him(look in your own mail inbox Billy). And whole copies of blogs so he doesn't have to do it himself. Didn't you brag that you already had a copy of this blog Bill?

      He wants it all, and then some. Pretty sure he will keep adding to the list of demands.

      Delete
    2. Waving at Oceans!
      & Amen on "he wouldn't know what to do with all of it!"
      Remember when he used rally the 'volunteers' to assist with the LA Database & entry stuff? He couldn't keep track of who did what & they didn't do it to suit him either! Wasn't that the first crack in the LA wall? Him being tacky, snippy & ungrateful for the volunteers work?

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    3. He did get very angry that they didn't work to his schedule. And then there was all those posts about how they kept his disc drives, oh wait, those were returned.

      Delete
    4. Maybe that's why he wants google to give him all his emails. He forgot how many people he took advantage of, and who might have a little something to say about his true character, and he's a tad bit worried.

      Delete
  4. LOL- and I hope his followers realize that he is hunting lemmings who have seen his LA YouTube videos...I guess he didn't like that people actually viewed them.

    Does Bill have a hunting or fishing license for this massive expedition? Can he justify any of those line items with specific legal reasons for Google to give them the info? And is he willing to limit himself to only those items he knows to be false statements? Nope, he wants everything, on everyone who has ever used his name anywhere in a post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Where can I see that Allie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was certified letter from the team of Google Attorney's to the court, with copies sent to those named in the lawsuit. Not sure it can be seen anywhere. In a nutshell, it just said no thank you, we're not playing.

      Delete
    2. was this a second reply from Google, or just the first one?

      Delete
    3. First to my knowledge, no idea really. Two motions filed, re: two certified letters to case parties, dated the same day as the same response.

      Delete
    4. FYI...
      Windsor has filed a motion to add Google as a named party to the Ellis Co. suit.

      Delete
    5. Awesome. Wonder if Google will take twenty bucks to just hand everything over to him. Meh, probably not. I know, I know, privacy, legalities, immunity, yada yada. But it'd be cool with me, as long as it helped to make him PTFD for once. THAT I'd pay to see. Guess I oughta go sign for the letters.....again.......LOL. Come on Google, please?

      Delete
    6. Well that figures. It would be great if Google finished the outing job you couldn't do.




      Delete
    7. I would absolutely enjoy it if those who did nothing wrong were exonerated and those who did, well, get Stfu. Is that wrong of me? As for all the ousting you keep pointing at, Pfft, I also would very much enjoy shoving the truth in your face. I'd pay for that as well, on behalf of all the good folks you've been bitchy, judgemental, and oh so better than. So, ya, I'm praying for the impossible. That Google needs a laugh and decides to unearth who did what.

      Everyone have a badass Saturday.

      Delete
    8. Are you really that dense?

      If you were all so worried about those who did nothing wrong being "exonerated" YOU wouldn't have dragged those that did nothing wrong into the fight YOU started. They wouldn't have anything to be "exonerated" for. And it's not too late to late for YOU to protect those who wish to remain anonymous from being dragged further into your rabbit hole. YOU can let Bill and the judge know how many people on that list have not had any direct contact with you by any means, had nothing to do with your fight with Bill. And while your at it, let them know which people spoke up against the behavior Bill objects to.

      Call me all the names you want, doesn't change what you are. And if you don't like having my opinion and the truth shoved in your face, STFU. You laughing at this situation that is costing people time and money to be "exonerated" from your bullshit is beyond despicable.

      Delete
    9. One thing straight, Nothing, I'm not laughing at the situation or the folks in it. I'm laughing at you. And how do you know I haven't done what you suggest? LOL. As I said, I'd very much enjoy shoving the truth at you. We have shopping to do, enjoy the rest of your day.

      Delete
  6. Wouldn't it be easier if Google took down his videos to avoid such future requests?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LMAO @ Anon.
      Why yes, I think Google should take down the Lawless America videos and streaming thingy. That way, they won't have to deal with Windsor demanding they turn over all IP's for viewers. Great idea!!

      Delete
  7. The Joeys are conspiring to expose my conspiracy to overthrow the government?

    ReplyDelete
  8. So, Bill is going to sue everybody that watched the videos he posted on you tube? Otherwise, what possible benefit can there be in demanding a overwhelming amount of useless information? Did I miss some restriction in watching the videos? Like only LA loyalists, conspiracy theorists and people that want to over throw the government are allowed to watch them?

    ReplyDelete
  9. My fav is the 'anyone who gave a thumbs down' complaint. That one cracks me up every time. How dare they!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Even for someone deemed vexi, this massive request for discovery is excessive to say the least. He wants information that's in no way part of his suit, or claims. He wants everything, and I can't see a judge allowing that level of discovery against hundreds of people who don't even know each other.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If they did this at no cost, and upheld by the courts, Google would be burdened by thousands of marketing firms and attorneys asking for IP addresses, for anyone that looked at anything. He's still living in 2004, still in his heyday.

    In a retirement home some day, Bill will probably be ranting about the manufacturer of bedpans, fellow residents that stole his domino's, it's sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it does seem that granting any part of his discovery request with no proof of anything defamatory would be the wrong precedent for Google to allow. It also seems that he is determined to file this same excessive discovery on each and every person he can on his hate list in as many jurisdictions as he can. Seems like he is taking vexatious to a new level. How many jurisdictions is he going after the same people in, and how many times is he going to ask these same people for the same discovery. It's all about cut and paste and change the defendant's name and refile. So he basically has nothing specific, just his belief that everyone should love him.

      Delete
    2. Actually, Bill has plenty of examples of defamation towards him. Some that could be proven as such, with all four elements of defamation involved. His problem, just my opinion, is he himself has defamed his defendants far worse than they him, and his "style" (eh hem) of litigation puts his own cases in the shitter. The vexy vacation and threats upon courts, the constantly breaking rules then crying he's but a poor pro se litigant, the over reactions and reactions (did I say over reactions) to everyday dislikes, the wasting the courts resources, plastering his business everywhere begging for the very reaction he get, and the taking his part to physical intimidation, kinda ixnay on the defaming game plan. He has to prove each instance was done, that a certain person did it, that the person did it on purpose with no regard for the truth, and that it harmed him in some way. All the while fending off his own "come at me bro" actions on the same instance, in front of a judge with knowledge of his history and threats to that very court's officers. It will be tough. If he'd just STFU and not get his own hands so dirty, and if he'd just PTFD and not go stalking, hell, he'd have a good case in several instances. ( Not near all or even most, but several) His unclean hands and his horrible actions are held separately from his allegations on his defendants. The courts could easily rule in his favor on certain instances. But they won't. He shits in his own nest every time. Then rolls around in it awhile so people will watch in shock, laughing and telling all their friends. Then when the audience is large enough, he jumps up and screams the people watching caused him to be covered in shit and stink the place up. My two cents. If I were a defendant, lol oh wait, I am, I'd want either dismissal or jury trial. (I'm confident in my own personal defense with or without and can debunk some or all elements in each instance, as many others can) The in between option could lead to a judge having to go by fact and law, with not much explaining or caring about the why's and how's. Just that A was said, it was said by B, that B reasonably knew it was false, and that it caused C. Not much focus on the but he's, the he did's, etc. No, I'm not defending Windbag. Just saying how I see it and that the free speech card gets played both ways. Or in this case, likely neither way. It's my opinion that he really really wants a landmark case. Like some want a million bucks, a happy family, that new house or another shot of heroin. Problem is, he sucks at it. Badly. Like a bull in a China shop. Covered in shit.

      Oh, and Google has immunity in most cases, and has already said they ain't playin' the Billshit, but generally, non parties that are asked to produce discovery are asked (and later ordered) to do so regardless if there is proof of defamation or not. That's the whole point of discovery. I totally agree though, that Windbag is running around doing the copy paste shuffle and gathering all the shit he can find for his nest.

      Delete
    3. Sorry for the run on paragraph. I kinda got long winded without realizing it.

      Delete
    4. Well, speaking for my self, I'm so relieved Allie has a firm grip on the obvious and is so willing to share what she's learned. However, I think Oceans was pointing out that Bill is demanding discovery from and about people who did not defame him and he is suing the people for which he may have a case against in multiple jurisdictions.

      What Allie failed to point out in her law lesson is that most of the people and non parties that are subject to Bill's complaint did not defame him and are not responsible for the behavior of those that did. In fact, Bill's complaint centers around the Noah thing, Allie's motion for PO, Booshie's harassment and AMPP making up nasty web sites. Maybe I missed it, was there an explanation from Allie for why so many people not involved with her, Booshie and AMPP are being sued?

      And this is my favorite part: "If I were a defendant, lol oh wait, I am, I'd want either dismissal or jury trial." Yeah, that dismissal thing worked out so well in MO.

      Delete
    5. Is Charlie Brown's mom talking again?

      Well, speaking for my self, I'm so relieved Allie has a firm grip on the obvious and is so willing to share what she's learned. However, I think Oceans was pointing out that Bill is demanding discovery from and about people who did not defame him and he is suing the people for which he may have a case against in multiple jurisdictions. ....YEP, I AGREE, AND DID THE FIRST TIME I READ IT AS WELL.

      What Allie failed to point out in her law lesson is that most of the people and non parties that are subject to Bill's complaint did not defame him and are not responsible for the behavior of those that did. .....YEP, I AGREE, NOT SURE WHY YOU DIDN'T PICK THAT UP FROM MY COMMENTS.

      In fact, Bill's complaint centers around the Noah thing, Allie's motion for PO, Booshie's harassment and AMPP making up nasty web sites. Maybe I missed it, was there an explanation from Allie for why so many people not involved with her, Booshie and AMPP are being sued? ...NOPE, NO EXPLANATION WAS GIVEN. YA WANT ONE?

      And this is my favorite part: "If I were a defendant, lol oh wait, I am, I'd want either dismissal or jury trial." Yeah, that dismissal thing worked out so well in MO......NOPE, IT WAS DENIED. IS THAT A SECRET? DOESNT CHANGE THE FACT I WOULD LIKE EITHER A DISMISSAL OR A JURY TRIAL. SMH. GO RUB ONE OUT OR SOMETHING, BE HAPPY, TRY IT, YOU MIGHT LIKE IT.

      @Oceans- it appears that Nothing worded her comment in a way to highlight my different opinions from yours, in a way to make it sound like confrontation. To be clear, Neh, no confrontation. Just disagreed with part and totally agreed with part and commented. That's what folks do that aren't digging panties out of a wad. I apologize if my comment came across as confrontational or anything but simply disagreeing with the first sentence and yammering my opinions like everyone else.




      Delete
    6. I still look at this whole intensive discovery as a farce. He is going beyond what would be reasonable, in a quest for more information about people that he intends to either sue, or destroy(his words) for the rest of his days. Hundreds of people. In his world it's guilt by association. If you have ever liked a page or a post, in his mind, you are guilty of whatever that person said. Like anyone can control what others say.

      He might have a case against some people out there, but no way does that include all these other people. And only a few of them have ever commented here.

      Asking for everything you have done in your life since Jan 2012 is absurd. Asking for passport information, and who you have ever spoken negatively to or about, or if you have ever used curse words or anatomical terms is absurd. I could go on and on about what I see in that discovery that is beyond related in any way to his case.

      Hey Bill my arm hurts today, there, I have now used an anatomical word in my post.

      Delete
    7. And NBTDT sums it up perfectly

      "What Allie failed to point out in her law lesson is that most of the people and non parties that are subject to Bill's complaint did not defame him and are not responsible for the behavior of those that did."

      Bill is overreaching in every way,.

      Delete
    8. when Bill brought up the c word in his filing, that insured that this would be a first rate circus. He thought that saying conspiracy would be his silver bullet to tie everyone in for the same "crimes".....but its actually going to be his undoing in the end.

      Delete
    9. I agree with everything you just said, Oceans, other than I think more than few have posted here. I thought I did make reference to the above, I was just focusing on the not so innocent in that comment. Agree, over reaching is an under statement. I think he's well aware of that, and his eye is on a different prize than winning in the traditional way. Feeding his addiction and his anger, is winning so to speak.

      Delete
  12. Does anyone have a link to Billy's First Amended Verified Petition out of Ellis Co?
    (forty plus pages...I'd hate to scan that bitch in!)

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://lawlessamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ELLIS-COUNTY-88611-Windsor-v-Joeyisalittlekid-Verified-Petition-2013-12-26.pdf
      This is the only one I know of

      Delete
    2. That's the link to the initial palaver...er...I mean petition, filed 26 DEC 2013. I'm in search of the most recent 15 JAN 2014 First Amended Version PDF (if available). Thanks.

      Delete
  13. Good ol' Butthurt Billy, you just gotta laugh at the irony in his railing about felony murder laws and guilt by association, then suing EVERYONE who's ever posted on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If the boobs case against Allie centers around the "Noah thing", I sure wish the idiot would've been able to have me served. It would be my testimony that could make his case orrrrrr....... I thought it centered around his completely exaggerated and mostly made up claim that Allie accused him of being a "mass murderer" and having a gun to use on a group of people. And that Allie was Walter. And caused him to lose his family. And shot Kennedy.
    The Boob is a dick!
    His cases are all centered around him being a dick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So...he's a boob and a dick? Make up your mind! (I kid, I kid).
      Remember the radio shows Yappy, Petunia and Brannon put on a while back?
      Personally, those shows were hysterical, esp. the Bangladeshis!
      I'm hear to tell ya...this blog had its WOODSTOCK moment, and it ROCKED!

      Folks, please keep all this in perspective. It will pass, and Billy will NOT prevail with all this nonsense! ROCK ON!

      Delete
    2. LMAO @ and shot Kennedy. Don't give him any damn ideas!

      Delete
    3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liWIbE1gQTk

      Delete
    4. @ Trooth: is Allie not sharing her docs with you? You seem to be unaware of some facts regarding Bill's action in TX. And here's a quote from Allie's petition for PO in MO: "...he has bought a gun for use on a group of people". Bill didn't make that up.

      Delete
    5. I'm aware. And Bill did say he bought a gun then directly after stated he had some ppl to see in Mo, Mt, Tx, Ks...etc. Allie is aware that the way she worded the complaint was a mistake and has learned a lot since then. It was very obvious, (to me anyway) that it was a veiled threat in attempt to intimidate haters. So, no, the boob didn't make up that statement. But he doesn't acknowledge that he DID post he bought a gun and was going to visit some ppl in states that coincidentally he was filing lawsuits in. I'm sure Allie would be the first to admit she worded her statement wrong. The "mass murderer"or "serial killer" thing... totally made up. And yes Anon, the Boob is a dick.
      In my opinion.

      Delete
  15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1AUULIn318 This is a great video

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bill is concerned about crazies hurting him, but then he incites others into wanting to harm others. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I missed a comment, I guess because I don't keep vampire hours, making an accusation that I hate Allie and I am hurt because she outed me. The comment has been deleted, so it must have been Snoozan that posted.

    My first thought was to thank Snoozan, for letting us all know who started and promoted that idea. I didn't think Booshie came up with that on his own. My second thought was, ummmmmm, how would Snoozan know which rocket scientist out of that group did start the rumor? My 3rd thought was, since Snoozan knows it was Allie starting that rumor, will she please confirm who hacked into my Google account trying to find my name?

    At any rate, Snoozan is sadly wrong on all other counts. I do hope she quits dropping that name. Booshie hates me so bad he was actually stalking that woman believing she is me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OH and a 4th thought - maybe Snoozan can also confirm who faked the e-mail note from me to Marty.

      Delete
    2. I missed a comment...making an accusation that I hate Allie and I am hurt because she outed me.

      My first thought was to thank Snoozan, for letting us all know who started and promoted that idea. I didn't think Booshie came up with that on his own.

      WHAT IDEA? THAT YOU HATE ALLIE OR THAT SHE OUTED YOU? WHAT DOES BOUSHIE HAVE TO DO WITH IT?

      My second thought was, ummmmmm, how would Snoozan know which rocket scientist out of that group did start the rumor?

      HOW WOULD I KNOW WHAT? I SWEAR NB, SOMETIMES THE ONLY EXPLANATION I CAN THINK OF FOR YOUR POSTS IS THAT YOU ARE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SOMETHING. WHAT RUMOR?

      My 3rd thought was, since Snoozan knows it was Allie starting that rumor,

      IT IS MY RECOLLECTION THAT ALLIE WAS THE ONE THAT CAME HERE AND SAID YOU WERE BETSI. MY RECOLLECTION COULD BE WRONG SINCE I DON'T CARE ENOUGH ABOUT IT TO RETAIN THE DETAILS, LOL.

      will she please confirm who hacked into my Google account trying to find my name?

      NOW YOU HAVE REALLY LOST ME.

      At any rate, Snoozan is sadly wrong on all other counts.

      WHAT OTHER COUNTS? YOU ARE CLEARLY HOSTILE TOWARDS ALLIE. I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT ALLIE OUTED YOU. YOU CAN SAY WHAT YOU WANT BUT WHEN YOU GOT OUTED YOU WERE MORE THAN A LITTLE UPSET BY IT.

      I do hope she quits dropping that name.

      YOU DON'T WANT ME TO TELL ANYONE THAT YOU ARE BETSI? OK THEN.

      OH and a 4th thought - maybe Snoozan can also confirm who faked the e-mail note from me to Marty.

      AGAIN, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

      HOPE THIS HELPS BETSI!

      Delete
    3. Pssst...Susan, shhhh, but I didn't out Nothing. Keep that between us.

      Delete
    4. hahahahahaha

      What idea?: The idea that the bully gang "outed" me or figured out my name. I can't figure out why it matters to any of you in the first place, unless it's just to harass me.

      How would you know that?: you posted your contact information for Allie and invited her to contact you. Why would she not contact you? You fit right in with Allie and Booshie, y'all appear to have the same agenda. And it was Booshie that first called me by that name. I believe I asked at that time where he had gotten the idea he'd "found" me. Then his little groupies started calling me that name. I don't recall that Allie ever referred to me by that name. But, it makes perfect sense that it was Allie who put 2 + 2 together and came up with ZERO.

      Hostile towards Allie: Yep. I think I've made it clear I don't tolerate duplicitous behavior and bullies. If she doesn't like being called out, she needs to find another blog or quit acting like everyone that posts here has the same agenda and is/wants to be involved in her activities. The dissertations she writes trying to justify, explain and rationalize her thoughts and behavior are sickening - the duplicity reeks. And I don't have time to explain the bully behavior to you, it should be obvious to you by now.

      Hacking: yeah, I was quiet about that until now. And gee, let's think about this for a second...who is it that wants to know my name so badly...
      But it's all OK. If the mission had been successful, you and they would not be calling me by someone else's name. And show me exactly where it was that I got "upset" anywhere on this blog about anything - strongly worded opinions and statements don't count.

      re: the fake e-mail: go find it. The fake note and my comments about it are posted on this blog somewhere. And again, let's think for second about who it is trying to harass me...

      And in continuing to call me by that name, you are attempting to harass me based on a rumor started by the Allie/Booshie gang. Maybe you don't care, but it is disturbing to me that Booshie has been stalking a woman that has no idea of his existence.

      Delete
    5. Excellent points NB. Who has sent out numerous calls for information in finding names? Bill. No one else. Who benefits if finding Bill names (real of fake)? The person(s) he said he would give a "get out of jail free card to."

      Snoozan did talk to Allie several times. It was posted here on the blog somewhere, that Allie didn't want Snoozans advice in how to shut "willy" down. But, Bill didn't seem to get that information and add Snoozan into his attack fest. Why is that? Who would delight in giving Bill the wrong names, but pretending they are the right ones? Seems like evil people that enjoy hurting innocent people. Not once, not twice, but several times. It will be interesting during discovery who gave Bill the names.

      Delete
    6. Yep. And as I was responding to Snoozan's stupidity, I realized there was another attempt to hack into my account over night.

      I've been watching for the name they call me to show up on TX court docs. Then nobody will need Google to know exactly where the information originated.

      Delete
    7. Wow! It's like that board game where they call out "the butler did it", over here.

      <-------still wishing hard, with both eyes shut and my fingers crossed, that Google gets annoyed and decides to entertain this little mess.

      Delete
  18. Look!
    MaryD is leaving Montana!

    Mary Deneen Bill, mailing stuff today. Not SAFE in MT, leaving today wearing my MT Grizzles hat!. TV Studio is Awesome!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. someone should tell her they have ticks in all states

      Delete
  19. Maybe one of the Lawless followers that read here on a regular basis would care to ask Bill why he's working with Marty to free Joey Dauben.

    Marty Prehn
    Hey Boobey since you are blocked from his page you cant see that he is the Captain of the SS MeKnow and I am his little buddy. Ok well actually his larger then life buddy and we communicate in many different ways and he has never demanded that I do anything including removing any regional director. He has asked for and I am providing an affidavit to Xxxxx's internet and blogging activities so we can have her commited to a long term mental facility while working to secure the release of Joey Dauben. Hex MVP please explain how you were under age when you made the false claim of being raped after getting drunk and the other question is it normal to continue a 6 month Loveall affair with your rapist and then brag to your neighbors that you are having consexual sex with attorney Krenik in order to pay off your kegal bill? Is that what they call QUID PRO QUO? In Michigan that is considered to be prostitution thus making you by definition a prostitute AND a pathological LIAR. Slang words would be a SLUT or a WHORE.
    Like · 54 minutes ago

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WOW - maybe Google is going to help out Joey too!

      Delete
    2. Cant you just see Marty having his stop the presses moment....."court you had made a huge mistake, Joey didn't rape MVZ, she made it up, you need to let him go"

      Delete
    3. Press conference at the local 7/11.

      Delete
    4. Wow.
      I'm so thankful Marty is Windsor's 'little buddy'!!!

      #winning

      Delete
    5. Marty is nasty. He and Bill seem to be cut from the same delusional, hate-filled cloth. I guess there really is somebody for everyone on earth. Thank goodness they've found each other. xoxo

      Delete
    6. Delusional, hate-filled cloth? that sounds like this gingersnap person. Who is this gingersnap anyways??? Only thing I know for sure is they live in Red Oak area.
      I seen this same person (gingersnap)on joey d's elliscountyobsever blog in the past making all kinds of remarks about others and their kids. Seem to me this is some over weight bald headed man in his late 30's to early 40's sitting around doing nothing all day, but getting on blogs and making comments about others to stir up crap. guess he does not have a job or a life!! Or he works for his daddy and plays on the computer while his dad is out making the money to feed his fat lazy son:)

      Before u make comments that hurt others and their family's- take a long look in the mirror and fix your own problems b4 passing judgment on others!! From what I hv seen posted by gingersnap in the past this is a good for nothing person who needs god in their life.

      At this point I am not sure that would even help this person

      Delete
  20. Hello, everything is going fine here and ofcourse every one is sharing data, that's actually good,
    keep up writing.

    Take a look at my web-site: Crazy Doctor Hack

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.