http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0785%20Appellant%20--%20Brief?id={33BAC0EB-396B-4110-A0EF-1C79067EC4B0}
Bill filed his "brief" which was anything but, for the appellate case in Montana. To sum up, everything that Boushie said is perjury and everything that Bill said is the facts on record. He claims Boushie defamed him while calling Sean a "serial criminal" which of course is point blank libel right there. Bill brags about his over the top filings as if its some kind of indicator of truth:
65. Contrary to the mere 15 pages and 9 unauthenticated exhibits by BOUSHIE [Exhibit#’s_1,2], WINDSOR has at least 233 pages of sworn testimony (all by me) and at least 617 pages exhibits in the RECORD." I hate to break it to Bill, but his "sworn" word in a court of law is no good and does not constitute a fact. This can be seen by the courts reaction to all of Bill's dead trees: "85. DC completely ignored the massive sworn testimony and evidence of WINDSOR. WINDSOR filed and the RECORD contains 203 pages of WINDSOR’S sworn testimony under penalty of perjury and 140 authenticated exhibits. [Exhibit#’s_3,4,19,22,24]
Pffftt....Sean didn't even slaughter a forest of trees in his answers, how could you listen to him?
You see Bill, you are going to have to come up with something more than just your word.
The next paragraph will show just how much Bill can't grasp this concept:
86. DC ignored the undeniable fact that WINDSOR has sworn under oath
under penalty of perjury before a notary that BOUSHIE’S sworn statements are
false. The RECORD contains detailed sworn filings and affidavits by WINDSOR
that controvert virtually everything alleged by BOUSHIE and his attorneys.
[Exhibit#’s_3,4,19,22,24.] There is absolutely no legal basis whatsoever to allow
this or any court to ignore the undeniable facts before it as DC has done. DC has
ignored its obligation to rule based upon the facts and to conduct a hearing to allow
WINDSOR to provide further undeniable evidence of the massive perjury and
criminal acts by BOUSHIE.
Bill claims he is no vexatious litigant
90. False Statement #3 – WINDSOR has filed sworn evidence showing
this to be false. WINDSOR is not a vexatious litigant and never has been.
[Exhibit#22,¶¶143-151; Exhibit#24,¶¶143-151.] In this matter, WINDSOR had an
action filed against him. [Exhibit#1.] Even if WINDSOR was a vexatious litigant,
which he is not, it would be totally irrelevant and is absolutely inappropriate for
DC to include in its November 14, 2013 ORDER.
Ahhh, but you are Bill. Just because you don't agree with Judge Thrash's ruling, doesn't change the fact that you were deemed a vexatious litigant in a Federal court. And yes Bill it is extremely relevant to everything you are doing right now, and for the past decade.
That's not my fat body
WINDSOR drove by ONCE to take photographs from a moving vehicle on the public road using a telephoto lens for use in the TV special that he is filming. BOUSHIE’S home had a giant plywood sign in the driveway with WINDSOR’S face mounted on a fat person’s body. WINDSOR did not
return to BOUSHIE’S home ever again
And how many times did Boushie drive by your house and take pictures?
Card carrying member of the press
You see what may look like a crazy old man driving from Georgia to Montana to stalk someone he doesn't like, isn't really that. Its a member of the press going up to film a tv show that he never produced, wrote, directed or even got permission to make.
"WINDSOR publishes online publications, and is the producer of a
documentary film and pilot for a proposed weekly TV series that will feature
BOUSHIE. WINDSOR is a card-carrying member of the press; has been a
magazine publisher for most of his career; began his media work in high school;
has been a radio and TV announcer and radio news reporter; formerly hosted a
weekly TV news show. For the last several years, he has published online, and he
has produced online radio and TV shows. He has over 1,200 news videos active at
www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. WINDSOR has been working for several
months on a TV special about BOUSHIE and the University of Montana. The
alleged stalking consists solely of WINDSOR filming his television news program
and segments for a documentary film."
Now please don't ask me to produce this "press card" I claim to have. And please don't ask me to produce examples of a flim or TV shows. I can show you lots of random youtube videos though, that counts right?
Its all corruption and a conspiracy
Bill has figured out why the lower court didn't rule in his favor....yep thats right they are all corrupt and working for Sean for some reason.
50. The Missoula Municipal Court (“MMC”) and the District Court
(“DC”) in Missoula County have acted in a bizarre and seemingly corrupt manner
in denying WINDSOR’S applications for a TOP just as have the Justice Court and
the District Court in Ravalli. [RECORD and Montana Supreme Court Dockets in
OP 13-0697 and DA 13-0540 and DA 13-0618.]
WINDSOR is concerned that the Ravalli County and Missoula
County courts and law enforcement may be protecting BOUSHIE for as yet
unknown reasons.Some have a theory that BOUSHIE is a professional cyper-stalker who works for governmental entities and personal to stalk and harass people such as WINDSOR. Another theory is that BOUSHIE has sexual blackmail on one or more powerful people.
105. This isn’t a case of an incompetent judge. This appears to be the case
of a corrupt judge who has committed the crimes of obstruction of justice,
misprision of felonies, perjury, and more.
Always a smart argument to make in a court of law. So have you told the court what you want to try judges like this for? Yep, treason. And have you told them what the penalty for treason is in your lawless america? Death
Life Liberty, and the Pursuit of Frivolous Lawsuits
113. CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION #2: The lower courts violated
WINDSOR’S inalienable rights by depriving him of liberty and property without
due process of law. WINDSOR has been denied the liberty of pursuing his career,
enjoying freedom of speech and freedom of the press, serving BOUSHIE with
legal papers, and much more in the outrageous TOP. [Exhibit#2.] WINDSOR has
been denied property rights in his website, and he has been denied his handgun
purchased for his protection.
way to go court, you are depriving Bill of his "right" to keep serving Sean with frivolous papers, I think the Founding Fathers are rolling over in their grave again. Oh...and you wont let him carry his gun that he doesn't have a permit for....you monsters.
Windsor has an extraordinary need for discovery
131. WINDSOR has been denied any discovery [Exhibit#12], but
discovery is essential to proving that BOUSHIE has committed perjury in his
entire PTOP. DC Order (Exhibit#12) cites Lear v. Jamrogowicz as authority that
discovery is not allowed in orders of protection matters. The facts are not at all the
same here. WINDSOR has an extraordinary need for discovery as it is the only
way to prove he is the victim. TOP’s were not designed so that a stalker
(BOUSHIE) can reinjure his victim (WINDSOR), but that is what has happened
here, and WINDSOR’S rights to due process must be paramount.
Unless people tell bill everything they have done for the last two years, he doesn't have a case.....where else do we see that?
Disabling my ability to commit paper terrorism
This issuance of the injunction was done in complete denial of due process to
WINDSOR. WINDSOR received no notice or opportunity to be heard.
WINDSOR does not have $50,000, so the requirement of $50,000 deprives
WINDSOR of any ability to ever file a lawsuit against this judge and the other
corrupt judges and judicial employees who WINDSOR intends to sue and intends
to seek a grand jury to bring criminal charges against the corrupt judges, corrupt
court employees, and corrupt law enforcement officials. There was no show cause
order issued to WINDSOR, and WINDSOR was not given an opportunity to be
heard on this matter as is required by law. Meaningful access to the courts is a
Constitutional right that has been denied by DC, and this alleged ORDER denies
significant rights.
Yeah court, you are wrong, I dont have $50,000, I have a lot....lot.....lot more money than that in case anyone wants some. Dont you dare stop my right to sue all these judges and bring forth my made up citizen grand juries. This is my Lawless America, I make the rules.
