Monday, March 10, 2014

Bill Windsor Tries to Scrub His Past


Bill Windsor never lies, as he reminds everyone repeatedly.  But one important component to that statement is the ability to erase everything he has said in the past.  Late last night, Bill sent out a plea to his followers for spying, but this time its to spy on himself.  You see those over 100 talkshoe shows of him blabbering on and on may have statements in them that contradict what Bill has already sworn in court that he never said.  You see, all those "haters" are lying about me, but just in case I'm gonna need to review and edit all the shows that I did where I spoke about grand juries, 501 c3 non- profits, proposed legislation (I never did that did I?), donations....oh and I forgot all the different things I said about the fake movie.

If Bill Windsor never lied then he has no reason to worry about all those talkshoe shows.  But he did, and now he does have to worry.  Oh and anything anyone else said is not important, only what Bill says....but then again we already knew that didn't we?

166 comments:

  1. Spot on Ginger. He may think nothing anyone else said is important, but that would be another large mistake on his part. I am curious as to why he needs this information, when he said he downloaded this entire site, and we have in the past, documented what he said, and when, to prove his lies. Not all of them of course, but numerous- very damaging ones.

    Also kind of blows his defamation out the door too, since everything is documented that we comment on what he does and says. Just because he doesn't like certain comments, doesn't make them defamatory. He seems to lack the ability to embrace humor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think his actually wording in the courts are "these comments are humiliating to the Plaintiff"

      Delete
    2. Maybe he needs to change the name to "Butthurt Across America."
      The abbreviation also works for his sheeple.

      Delete
    3. Um no @ 3:59 Probably Sharon/Susan Troll. You missed the entire point as usual.

      Delete
    4. Really? Well by all means tell me what 10:58 WAS asking then?

      Delete
    5. LMAO you're such an idiot Sharon. If he downloaded this site, he doesn't need the lemmings to go find what he said and when. All the work was already done. Why is that so difficult for you to follow? Hahaha no wonder you fools haven't "taken your country back yet."

      Delete
    6. OMG Sharon. R E A L L Y S L O W N O W... read it carefully.
      There are plenty of links to his talk shoe shows on this blog, with times and dates of what he is specifically requesting over on his FB page that you frequent.

      If that is too difficult for you to comprehend, why don't you be a good lemming and listen to all 106 of them, and analyze them with your super duper litigious mind and find exactly what he asked for, since you think you know everything.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  2. LOL - love the photo.

    I disagree with Bill. IMO, the guests on the show are relevant and what they said is important.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I think it will help to prove he was never misunderstood in his intent, and it was clear. Also, when he said he was a 501 c3 long before he actually filed for one. I believe when the "haters" pointed out that the IRS didn't have any records of a 501 c3 for Lawless America or Bill Windsor, he put out request- and he had two people offer theirs for his use. I think that is pretty important.

      Also, something else is bothering me about that 300+ affidavit he submitted last week. He has tons, I mean tons of allegations that don't pertain to him. He brings up things that are totally irrelevant to himself. Like other people allegedly harassed. That has nothing to do with him. Is he really that desperate for manufactured evidence to support his BS? Rhetorical of course. That affidavit is "Void" in my opinion. LOL

      Delete
    2. "I disagree with Bill. IMO, the guests on the show are relevant and what they said is important." That all depends on what was said and whether or not Bill agreed with it.

      "I believe when the "haters" pointed out that the IRS didn't have any records of a 501 c3 for Lawless America or Bill Windsor, he put out request- and he had two people offer theirs for his use. I think that is pretty important. "

      HOW is that important? What does it prove?

      Ninja you are correct that the affidavit is rife with irrelevant information. However, that does not make the affidavit void.

      Delete
    3. Wow, you just don't get humor do you? I was mocking Windsor's constant whining about Void orders. Sheesh.

      As for the rest of what you said, it's not worth explaining to you.

      Delete
    4. Hey Snoozan! Guess what???? Nobody here is obligated to answer your questions. And I'm pretty sure nobody cares what you think or your level of understanding. As regards to Ninja's post, again SARCASM!

      As far calling anyone posting here a hater, well that is a good example of the pot calling the kettle black. IMO, YOU are the most antagonistic, hateful reader here since Booshie got muzzled.

      If you can't keep up with the discussion, why don't you do something more useful to the revolution? Go back to read all the anonymous comments posted since 11/12 to see if you can figure out which ones are mine.

      Delete
    5. Go fuck yourself Betsi Bixby

      Delete
    6. Booshie is still lurking. I knew he was.

      Next time you give wrong information to Bill, make sure he writes the wrong name down right. K?

      Or did you spell it wrong? Koward.

      Delete
    7. You are just a lying boring bitch. don't you have a prayer meeting to go to or something?? Im sure theres one in your home town of Weatherford that a good Christian asshole like yourself can go to. What a two faced bitch you are.

      Delete
    8. hahahahahahahaha

      You have no idea how many people are laughing at you right now.

      Delete
    9. Just to make clear if any one at U of M cares what Booshie does during working hours.

      ^^^^^^ that's him at 4:43 & 4:49. My very own fan club.

      Delete
    10. I'm laughing! I haven't quit laughing since the big tough guy hid under his desk when Windsor showed up. Good thing his wife had the balls to run the big bad Willy off.

      Delete
    11. Booshie, and the Booshie sock puppets are so stupid. Bill contacted the person they told Bill she was. It was the wrong one. He is too stupid to understand when some random person calls someone up on the phone, out of the blue, and asks some asinine question, if they don't engage in a conversation, and say you have the wrong person and hang up, that means piss off you have the wrong person. Only lemmings and lemming leaders would assume that means they have the right person.

      Delete
    12. Right, I'll just call Bill up and tell him how STUPID all of you are and how all of you played him.

      WTF is wrong with you people? I mean besides stupidity. It's your mistake, your mess - you f'ing clean it up. I am in no way responsible for and have absolutely no intention of participating in your attempts to find and harass me.

      And further more, who I am is absolutely NONE of your business. If you don't like what I say, don't read my comments or find another blog where your stupidity, foolishness, foul mouths and bullying ways don't matter to any one.

      In the mean time, know that all you have accomplished in your attempts to harass me for standing up to you is cause Booshie and Bill to stalk a woman that has no idea men so evil are watching her. You all should be very, very ashamed of yourselves. Especially the people that call themselves advocates for abused women.

      Delete
    13. NBTDT- they are just evil and vindictive. This woman told Bill he had the wrong person, yet, he decided to sue her anyway. Now, why after a phone call, did he decide to send her something to sign? She doesn't owe him shit. I don't know anyone who would sign some random document sent by some stranger.

      Bill will end up paying this woman money I would bet.

      Delete
    14. sadly I have seen these methods used before. Stalking innocent people who have no clue WTF you are talking about or who you are can get you in some real trouble. Especially when they lawyer up. It is really frightening when these guessing games go wrong, and idiots chase after innocent people who have never heard of them.

      I am sure all of this will not matter to these idiots. Innocent people are being targeted, and stalked and harassed. Deep down, Bill knows he has the wrong people. Deep down he just doesn't care either.

      And no one in their right mind would sign a disclaimer and provide their personal information to a loony tune who calls and threatens them with a lawsuit if they don't. I'd be calling a sheriff. And if I read the stuff he is accusing these people of, a lawyer too.

      I would think the person was a dangerous and deluded person...oh wait....

      Delete
    15. Did Bill ever answer Susan's question about a deadline for signing the affidavit? I never saw it if he did. Is he ignoring her now as well. She just can't catch a break.

      Delete
    16. I guess you really have to wonder whose side those sleuth lemmings are on huh Bill. Are they trying to help you, or trying to set you up?

      Delete
    17. If all it took was to say that's not me, and I don't know who you are, that would be one thing Anon 7:56. But Billy asked for much more than that didn't he? And what makes anyone think he can be trusted? His legal history of continual lawsuits would hardly convince me he can be trusted. Heck, just seeing how many people he is trying to add to that lawsuit would convince me he is not to be believed. And I sure as heck wouldn't provide him with any personal information given the history of what he has already done to other people. See his Lawless America site for examples. Google of his name would also prevent me from signing anything for him. His word means nothing based on his own history.

      Delete
    18. @ 7:56 (Sharon)- no, you are completely wrong. When Windsor called this woman she gave him her answer. He just didn't like it. Sending her the affidavit was harassment. He has zero proof. Only some assholes who set him up. Probably like you who probably told him to send the affidavit in the first place.

      Delete
    19. He filed a motion to add her the same day he mailed the affidavit. So the whole "gave her a chance to deny" is nothing more than Susan trying to defend Windsor just so she can argue with people here.

      Delete
    20. LOL, it is pretty funny that he is being played by the fools who gave him names to people who don't even know who he is or what he is talking about. That's called a setup Bill, and you have been well played. Either that or the people you are trusting really are that inept. Could be both.

      LOL, and I know he won't believe it because I am saying it, but you got it wrong Bill. You sources are as clueless as you are for believing they know anything.

      Delete
    21. You know what's even funnier Oceans, is that the profiles he thinks are real people, are some of his least favorite people. He's just too stupid to know which ones. But, if he tried really hard to think about it, I bet one brain cell might fire up that dingy light bulb. *hint* it isn't any "Joeys" Bill.

      Delete
    22. Oh, I should add ^^^ that means you have to stop thinking that everyone who posted here in the past, or some who sporadically post now, are "Joeys"

      Delete
    23. his head would explode before he would believe that the whole world is not Joeys...and yep, I've noticed some of his favorite people are not so nice when they post outside his little page. He might be shocked what some of them say about him vs. the things they post on his FB.

      It's pretty funny how he labels people who did a quick post or two here as Joeys. Some of them left all kerfluffled and angry because we didn't buy their snizzle either. He just finds it easier to try to say there is some big ole scary conspiracy. That's what happens when you hang out with a bunch of conspiracy nuts.

      I really love the ones who think we get paid for this. Why is it so hard to see that we are just people who don't agree with him? People who fact check and form opinions.

      LOL, he really does think the world should just believe him and follow him blindly. And yes, I know how silly that sounds

      Delete
    24. " Why is it so hard to see that we are just people who don't agree with him? People who fact check and form opinions."

      Exactly.

      Delete
    25. Motive is the answer. What is your motive for harrassing Bill? Remember where there smoke. There is also fire. Your overdone interest in Bills movie. Tweaks something that causes me discomfort. Like why are you Gangstalking both..Bill and myself? Could it possibly be that you have some corrupt behavior yourself. That you're trying to prevent Bill from bringing to the attention of the public?

      Delete
    26. Sorry to burst your bubble Nan, but the whole "movie" thing was only to get people to join Bill's Revolution. He said it numerous times, maybe too many Mike's in your head confused you. Now, Bill has had plenty of opportunities to finish his movie, but he chose not to. It is Bill who is gang-stalking by sending out "Sleuths" to hunt us. We are merely exercising our first amendment rights to disagree with his whole Revolution, which is to take over offices around the country, and charge everyone currently in office that they remove with Treason.

      You really need to pay attention. There are plenty of people who don't agree with Windsor's agenda. You will find them all over the place. Big hint...we aren't all "Mike." But I think the "Mikes" of the world are the one's who need to be charged with Treason. You all are anti-government. You want to form your own version of Government the way YOU feel it should be. Not the way it was set up. Personal accountability Nan. None of the Billified people seem to want to acknowledge they lack the ability to accept responsibility for their own actions.

      Gang-stalking, not so much. It's you that keeps coming over here Why? Nan, look in the mirror. Your double talking, sidestepping, finger pointing, everything is corruption crap doesn't fly.

      Delete
    27. Nancy said, "tweaks" lol.
      Sorry, struck me funny.
      Carry on.

      Delete
  3. I am Sure the FBI, has all the tapes. I wonder who is going to help him with the soap on the rope, while he is in Jail

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then doesn't special agent prehn have access to the files then?

      Delete
  4. Law enforcement are probably reading the incoming email he gets so they will also know what talkshoe has what in it. Lol thanks bill they said lol.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shout out to my main man, Billy "Butthurt" Windsor...you just got STAYED.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ml9VKbsoQU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah...poor Billy...seriously, there's no need to edit...we have every single one of your Talkshoe shows archived already. You're Welcome!

      Delete
    2. Wow. Judge Carroll should have checked in with Snoozan before he stayed the case to consider Thrash's order. He might not know she said the order is void and he can't do that.

      Delete
    3. FO, Sharon...just FO.

      Delete
    4. * Crazy lemmings running through the streets screaming Void orders, Void orders* doesn't make them "Void"

      Delete
    5. Clean up on Isle 4, Supertroll broke another club rule.

      Delete
  6. From somewhat of an insider. Who has a history of lining up dots.
    what I can read between the lines. Looks like this.
    Someone out in this vast United States. Has taken over the Government identities of some retired employees. Who really don't know a thing about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. are you in time out again Nan?

      Nope, no government conspiracy, or any conspiracy at all. I know that is hard for you to grasp, so I won't bother trying. But at least you got the part right about people not knowing a thing about it. Bill is chasing people who don't even know who he is.

      Delete
    2. Well I know a lot about it. What I have found is a whole lot of Hypocrites.
      They talk big. Act big..as if. When push comes to shove they vanish. Go into hiding behind fake screen names. Use those they can in essence Blackmail and manipulate. To do their dirtywork for them.
      In a more functional world. These same people would be investing their time, money and their effort. Into helping to prevent true victimhood and assiting those who have been victimized.
      If you can't be part of the solution. Don't become part of the problem.
      Make complicated issues out of simple problems.
      All of this was avoidable. If certain people did not think they were above the law or better than others.
      Who knew the right thing to do. Yet felt the rules. They are for other people..certainly don't apply to me.
      Wrong. There is right and there is wrong.
      Wrong choices lead to wrong places. Eventually you will hit a point where it stops.
      Time to unwind the yarn.

      Delete
    3. Time out..haha my ass Time Out. Hypocrite.
      Dispise liars and hypocrites. Who critique others. To keep the focus off of their own much worse deeds.
      The lowrst form of worm slithering this planet.
      Lie, cheat and steal from anyone. Including their own family.
      Then cry victim when the tables are turned.
      As was said in grade school. "If you can dish it out. Better be prepared to eat it.".
      Indescribible dissappointment.Fakester witha capital F.

      Delete
    4. Immature Chickenshit. F..king PeterPan Syndrome. Toys are us kid.

      Delete
    5. Nancy isn't welcome anywhere. She is foul, foolish, and in need of some serious mental help. Windsor is a jackass for encouraging her, instead of helping her seek help. Now, what the hell kind of leader will allow seemingly mentally ill people to think they are healthy, productive members of society. I guess if Windsor takes over, the mental health industry will be abolished, so the nuts can run the offices.

      Delete
  7. I have a question for that Anon that seems to be a rabid Windsor supporter, Snoozan.
    Why does Bill Windsor make his Facebook posts about those he believes are on his to be sued "Joey" list private? For his Facebook friends only? If he's so fearless and is putting them on social media blast, wouldn't he reach more readers with public posts? That method seems rather cowardly, IMO. Of his approximately 230 Facebook friends, I only see the same 6 to 10 liking or commenting on all his posts. Usually, it's that one woman Sharon that uses her comments to promote her own agenda. Then, there's that Marty guy and he's always putting weird sexual innuendo stuff, that is just plain gross. There's always that Mary woman that makes sentences that are at least a hundred words and always mentions her Lyme's stuff. Or that Nancy woman that complains about her ex a lot and puppets. Is that really all he's got as a target audience? Then, you Snoozan? You're always over here, defending him. Why doesn't he use a fan page? Windsor posts as if he has thousands of readers, where are all those?
    I've been reading here, and you always have the explanations for everything Bill Windsor says or does. How are these individuals supposed to be intimidated if they're unaware? Isn't that what his posts are about? Intimidation? What Windsor deems retaliation? It doesn't seem like he's getting the intended targets recently.
    My other question is, how does Windsor remove one name when he does figure out he chose incorrectly? Or do those wrong people named get removed or replaced in his lawsuit in Texas ? 1,000 people is a lot of people! A lot more people than seem to be supporting Windsor, just using his Facebook numbers as an indicator.
    Since Snnozan seems to know more about Windsor than anyone else, hopefully she can explain this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It appears that there is going to be a Talkshoe Hosted By Bill on March 16th a Sunday at 7pm. I will be listening as long as it is public.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill is a coward he chickened out he's not having a talkshoe now. How can he lead a movement when he's too worried if what he says will be incriminating

      Delete
    2. Nope, he already cancelled it. He's promising a video instead LOL

      Delete
    3. the man who says he is producing a documentary film on government corruption is now too scared to even do his own radio show. His followers have to be wondering...is this really their savior?

      Delete
    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0Qcv3YV4aA&

      Delete
    5. He's worthless. Not worth any energy or even reading his stupid blatherings anymore. Did anyone think there would really be a talkshoe? Besides his 26 followers I mean. The guy has spent a few years, several hundred grand, and every waking hour of angry energy, for 26 facebook followers. He couldn't even accomplish a news worthy scam. Yes Bill, I said scam out loud. It's my opinion. Nobodies is an under statement. In my opinion, he's just a stalking, suing, grown toddler who didn't get his way so he's inflicting as much pain and hardship on people as they will let him. I'm not saying he isn't dangerous if people let him be, or that he's not a problem for vulnerable people. He is. I was one myself. I'm just saying that the energy is what he is after. Like jeepers creepers without the cape. Or the truck. Or the producer, lol. Or the movie, lol. Once you stop putting energy in, he's nothing. All that's left is helping other people steer clear of the wingnut and showing the authoritiiii what he really is. He's probably in the corner at his computer, scowl on his face, jacking off angrily, pounding out more crap that no one reads.

      Delete
    6. I think you nailed it on all counts. Hopefully he will just fade away in his own misery

      Delete
    7. Thanks GS. Everyone has their own opinions of this blog. Either they love it or hate it. I disagree way more often here than I agree, these days, but giving people the other side of the Windsor Chronicles is important. If it makes someone question Bills almighty power, if it makes someone think to check his record, it has done its job. That's not a conspiracy, it's a favor.

      Delete
    8. @ 7:00, nope, not angry at all. Just over it.

      Delete
    9. Thanks. And yea it's just a blog. There are millions of them out there. People can read whatever Bill says and choose to believe it. They can read my blog or not, agree with me or not. Either way is fine by me, but I think the main reason for all the fuss is many more people agree with what I'm putting out than is bill. And to that extent I'm glad I was able to provide a public service announcement

      Delete
  9. He's scared to have his "radio show" as he claims he has because he is afraid of cyberstalkers. Does Sean hannity or Glenn beck just stop having a show because people disagree listen and then comment on what they say. BILL WINDSOR IS A JOKE!!!! there is no radio show.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think he is scared, he is trying to make it appear this way, but looking back on Windsor's looooog sorted history of lying and drama for effect, this is nothing more than that. He wants the few followers to feel sorry for him, and keep them spinning on Government conspiracy's. It's hog wash and everyone knows in. Those poor blind people still actually thought the "movie" was about them after all.

      Delete
  10. This is a path to suicide http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/14-03-12%20SOVEREIGN.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The People, the PEOPLE, the people....but they kinda brush aside the fact that THE PEOPLE elected the legislators currently in power.

      I love the signature at the end by the Common Law Grand Jury Administrator....just a bunch of pointless circles. That sums up these mentally ill people

      Delete
    2. Six pages of word vomit.
      Spin & more spin.

      Delete
    3. I told y'all - these people are scary. A couple of weeks ago I posted about a blog talk radio show Darash was on. He's got something big planned within the next few weeks. With an 'or else' at the end of it. He was cryptic about the end but it sounded not good. As I recall, sending out several of these letters was like phase 1.

      Like Gingersnap said - these groups ignore the fact that the legislators and judiciary hold office because the majority of THE PEOPLE put them there.

      And when you have somebody with views the likes of Jon Roland, yep, that has caused me to consider the Libertarian party a haven and platform for SovCits. Godwin's Theory aside - Darash's rhetoric has a lot of similarity to the Nazi party before 1933.

      "Police across the Nation are being militarized and soon you will be going out on “operations” instead of patrol and you will be caught up in arresting and killing people in the name of America, after all they are just sovereign terrorists."

      I certainly hope Darash is right, if he proceeds with his plan. If they threaten to remove, by force, officials duly elected or appointed by the majority of THE PEOPLE, then I will support the effort of our duly sworn PEACE OFFICERS to do whatever it takes to keep our country out of their hands. If our laws and elections don't matter, anarchy is next, followed by a totalitarian government.

      Delete
    4. I am proud to have served during the 1st Gulf War and in Bosia supporting the Special Forces.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Link below is for last night’s NLA radio show.

      This is the 5th letter sent. To educate the addressees. To teach about them about the Constitution, people in courts and Sheriffs don’t understand it. NLA is organizing with Oath Keepers for the next step. The next step is all hush, hush for strategic reasons. NLA is going to send a letter to the oath takers every week until they get in power.

      Under NLA’s system, Judges will get one chance to “straighten up”, then they will be true billed, indicted and “yanked from office”. Straighten up by what standards?

      Darash says “we can bring this nation back to 1789 before the summer is out”. After they get New York in position and the judges in order, they’ve got plans to help Connecticut, Oregon, Washington and Utah. Also after they come to power, Darash is going to write a text book on his principles to re-educate kids in grade school. Darash’s idea of “bringing all people together” is including all Christians - Catholics, Episcopalians, Baptists, etc.

      And then I had to quit listening. Except for the religious foundation, Darash basically implemented Bill’s plan to “take back our country”. But Darash did it with better focus (he ignores dissenters and trolls) and without collecting all that evidence before forming Citizens Grand Juries and putting them to work. All of his followers are as vexi as Bill’s. And all judges and lawyers are corrupt. Same song, different verse.
      Mary B is a caller on the show. She’s still filing complaints and getting arrested.

      http://www.blogtalkradio.com/nationallibertyalliance/2014/03/11/common-law-grand-jury

      Delete
  11. Oh Windsor just pulled his head out of his ass and realized he got the wrong name wrong. LOL stand by for the amended amendment of frivolousness.
    So stupid that he believed the fake people, over the real one who told him she wasn't the right person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just when I think these sickos can't get any worse, they come up with stuff even more bizarre. No wonder their own lives are so messed up.

      Delete
    2. He should stick with Agent Prehn for intel.

      Marty Prehn August 26, 2013 at 8:35 PM
      "Due to the nature of my activites and the access I have each year I am required to take a mental aptitude test so to refute one of the comments made on the Joey blog. I am not an idiot."

      Delete
    3. Thx, Spammy. Good point.

      At least Marty was closer to right than the other idiots.

      Delete
    4. That Marty quote is one of my favorites, as it disproves itself in the same sentence.

      "Aptitude is not knowledge, understanding, learned or acquired abilities (skills) or attitude. The innate nature of aptitude is in contrast to achievement, which represents knowledge or ability that is gained."

      But still, he has to take it year after year...

      Delete
    5. That's about the same as him having me charged for "liable"!!

      Delete
    6. Give him credit for trying his damnedest to sound intelligent.

      He's "special"...

      Delete
  12. I would like to add that IF the name of Betsi is an innocent person and IF they say who it was or not was that gave BW the wrong name. WHY are they not helping this woman? Maybe someone could have given her a heads up? OR maybe they're thinking their investigative skills are such that they figured out who it was by passing along a "red herring"? EITHER way I look at it, that's some EVIL SNIZZLE. The red herring IS an innocent person, correct? SO WHO IS THE ONE OF THE JOEYS GIVING UP INNOCENT PERSON'S ID'S? IF she is really truly the Betsi that they say she is, all I can say is that is ONE stupid bitch who shouldn't have access to dv victims. Someone told me of a conversation that they had in regards to why nbt is such a cunt. A couple of the GENII told the person they didn't understand why nbt was the way she was because she was such a NICE person in real life. Is she really? I can't even imagine.

    This is a funny comment when you consider the fact that one of their best friends who post on that page is the person who came up with that name for NBTDT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are clueless over there. Just because we aren't saying much, doesn't mean we aren't doing anything. They are the ones who are over on their page trashing this woman based on absolutely no facts what so ever, other that Booshie and his sidekick ex #2. Oh, yes, we all know the identities of those puffers. It's a group of butthurt bitches and one large asshole, who couldn't post at the clubhouse anymore.

      Delete
    2. You mean the ball less Koward who hid behind his wife when Windsor came to town. I can't believe his wife would let him play with those idiots.

      Delete
    3. You have no idea who my friends are, let alone "best" friends. It doesn't matter who the exact person is that played Bill. The larger issue is why the gang set Bill up with all kinds of false information to make sure he would harass me.

      Give it a rest already. That's not the only wrong person Bill is trying to sue. I only tell y'all to STFU about that one because you are continually using someone else's name to harass me. I was hoping y'all would do the decent thing. But, you've made it clear none of you have an ounce of decency. And I doubt very seriously that your opinion of me is worse than my opinion of any one of y'all.

      Delete
    4. @ 10:12: And what exactly is your purpose in posting such ugly comments about me?

      Delete
    5. My intuition tells me that it is Yappy providing information.

      Delete
    6. I don't care which specific person came up with any name. What I care about is that there are people cruel enough to deny and/or compromise one's right to anonymity and free speech. Then based on an irrational hatred, pull information out of their butts and give it to paper terrorist for the sole purpose of harassing people of their choosing just because they can.

      What I care about is the freaks that play this sort of game continue in their attempts to harass me by slandering and demeaning the name of someone they don't know and who doesn't know about them. If any of the people involved in the effort of harassing others were decent people, we wouldn't be having any of this discussion.

      Delete
    7. That's a comment from the powerpuff page. I reposted it because they are upset someone gave Bill the wrong name. I thought it was funny because I think the wrong name came from Booshie, their friend.

      Delete
    8. Thank you for the explanation. I didn't understand your comments at the bottom.

      Delete
    9. NBTDT : Do you think it was wrong for this blog to attack Joey Dauben's family for his transgressions? I do..

      Delete
    10. I don't think this blog "attacked" anybody. I think there have been several individuals come and gone, and some that just won't go away, that "attack" people. They are just nasty people.

      As for opinions about public behavior - that's an easy fix. Don't act stupid in public, don't air dirty laundry and nobody will have anything to talk about.

      Delete
    11. This blog reported information that included a story about Joey Dauben's parents contemplating divorce in legal proceedings. None of their children knew about that beforehand. There were many more attacks. GS sanctioned and participated in it.

      Delete
    12. Attacking someone's parents to satisfy a grudge is just about as low as you can get.

      Delete
    13. How is it I am responsible and why do I owe anyone, but especially the two of you, any explanation for the behaviors of others?

      That's a rhetorical question. Since Snoozan is handling out legal advice, she ought to know the answer to that question. Many people have been victimized by Snoozan, as well as Bill on behalf of AMPP, Booshie and Allie. But here Snoozan is, blaming the victims. The justification for the continued attacks on me indicates just how mentally ill all of you are and provides ample explanation for why you picked somebody like Bill to "lead" you in the first place. And I don't think there is a word that adequately describes just how sick it is that you think it's OK for Booshie to stalk and harass people, lie about it to 5 courts and then start the process over on a new victim.

      I would invite you to be specific about anything I've posted that is unethical, mean or inaccurate so we can discuss it. But I don't think you are capable of an honest, fair or civil discussion. You've lost any chance to prove me wrong. This is the last time I will respond to either of you.

      Delete
    14. You lost me there. I don't know Booshie is, I'm not being led by anyone and I'm not accusing you of anything. I've said before I thought you were one of the more rational personalities on this blog. I haven't followed stuff closely enough lately to really know what all is happening.

      Delete
    15. @ Webb - I was really talking more to Snoozan, who said ugly things after your post. Then she got deleted. As regards to you & me, I'm not going to rehash the Dauben stuff.

      Delete
  13. I've been trying to follow the developments for curiosity's sake here and on Bill Windsor's FB page. Missed a lot I'm afraid. What happened to Yappy's blabbering, representative of the self-described pretty, popular figure she believes herself to be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would break my heart if you are only here to see yappy.

      Delete
    2. You might not want to hang out here too long though. I heard Bill is looking for you too.

      Delete
    3. Me? I never got to far beyond the Joey Dauben issue. As you have heard, I allegedly fell in love with him while covering the story -- sigh.

      Delete
    4. And, NBTDT, it is only you in whom I'm interested. I think Yappy might be perversely kinky.

      Delete
    5. ya, Bill still has at least 960 spots to fill with the 1k anons, so Im sure he is willing to add anyone and everyone, whether they talked about him or not

      Delete
    6. hahahahaha, thank you.

      Yeah, the way I heard it is Bill wants to read all your Google & Facebook stuff.

      Delete
    7. Well, he is welcome to it. I never heard of him prior to reading about him on JIALK.

      Delete
    8. No, A L L of it. Your emails, private messages, A L L of it, not just your public posts.

      Delete
    9. I don't think he would get it, but there is nothing in my stuff that would benefit him.

      Delete
    10. Mine either. But I hear he's busy tracking me down for it in Weatherford. Eh, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's not like he can sue Google to get it.

      Delete
    11. David what are your thoughts on bills efforts to have grand juries and then execute politicians for treason?

      Delete
    12. Who the f&ck cares?

      Delete
    13. I'm not familiar with Windsor's theories. Like I said, I never heard of him before I read his name on this blog. I haven't followed all of the posts about him. I just am not interested in all of it. I'm sort of curious about the personalities posting comments on this blog from the perspective of abnormal psychology, though.

      Delete
    14. My belief is that this is one of the most intricate cases of Disassociative Identity Syndrome that has ever turned up. As far as abnormal psychology goes. A great case to study.

      Delete
    15. Nancy? Zero banned you from commenting, huh? Windsor won't entertain your "everyone is Mike" claims. Now, you're attempting to discuss/diagnose psychological disorders! Oh, the irony!
      One word, Nancy, just one: B Y E

      Delete
    16. I'd be interested in Webb's answer to Flemming's question.

      Delete
    17. David, be very wary of KittyKat if you chose to get into a discussion with her, she thinks everyone on the blog, are made up names by her Ex-Mike, even Gingersnap, Yappy, NBTDT, Sean, hell I guess even you are one, even Hitler, and Satan, and God and the pink unicorn are all part of Mike's identities, according to her

      Delete
    18. I don't really have an answer because I don't know anything about it. However, I oppose the death penalty so I wouldn't be in favor of executing anyone for treason.

      Delete
    19. "I'm sort of curious about the personalities posting comments on this blog from the perspective of abnormal psychology, though."

      Really Webb, you should learn more about Windsor's proposed legislation and plans for a revolution. The psychosis found here is not really a matter of public concern, just an irritation to the sane folks. What Windsor, Roland, Schied, the NLA and similar groups have planned should concern you and the rest of the US population.

      Delete
    20. "I'm sort of curious about the personalities posting comments on this blog from the perspective of abnormal psychology, though."
      Those comments would be from the same commenters found here:
      https://www.facebook.com/pages/Powerpuff-Girls-Two/200074086833537

      Delete
    21. The large version, with the "scientist" monkey boss! Yep, that's them. Trolls of all trolls. Bitchy, Witchy, Itchy, and Tiny.

      PowerPuff 2 Creators of the numerous blogs Windsor hates.

      Delete
    22. @ 4:44 - LMAO

      @ 4:21 - Isn't that the truth! If Webb wants a full does of abnormal psychology he should trot over there to the source.

      Delete
    23. Was that meant to say dose? Of abnormal psychology.

      Delete
    24. Yes, thank you Nancy for catching my typo. I meant dose.

      Delete
  14. LOL - this was found under Marty's post about Michael Behenna's release from prison. Seems to be code from the family for - don't call us, we probably won't be calling you either.

    Marty Prehn At the request of the Behenna family they want to keep the fanfare to a minimum on Friday when Michael is set free and will have a public event in the next few weeks in Oklahoma once Michael has adjusted to his new status of being an American HERO.

    And while I understand his anger and frustration, Michael murdered a man. Heroes don't murder people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is Marty's excuse for why he's not going to Kansas to escort the guy home to Oklahoma.

      Delete
    2. Oh, so nobody would give him as money?

      Delete
    3. He was to be his official escort from Kansas to Oklahoma on Friday...

      Delete
    4. Redundant. Sorry, Bob.

      Delete
  15. You know the difference between the Powerpuff Girls jogging with Booshie and a bunch of pigmies? One is called a pack of Cunning Runts, the other is called a pack of......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahahah OMG !!!
      You Nailed it!

      Delete
    2. Those false accusers can only get their fat asses off the couch to cash their welfare checks,eat, and make more babies so their food stamp amount goes up. They damn sure ain't jogging anywhere unless they're chasing some Bonbons.

      Delete
  16. I found this BBC documentary on stupidity. It's thought provoking, if you are interested in raising the level of the lowest common denominator.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDsnCrSfzCQ

    ReplyDelete
  17. once again the irony of the "commentators" here watch the stupid movie recommended here and you pretty much see everyone here and with Billy all peas in a pod

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^duh^^^ Could another here fit in that? You're still here & compelled to comment.
      So? That make you what?
      Ironic?

      Delete
  18. A look back at just how much Bill has accomplished since this time last year! Oh my! what a huge difference a year can make. Or not. bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Bill Windsor
    March 10, 2013
    LAWLESS AMERICA STATUS REPORT

    I haven't been posting much for the last several days as I have been enduring the misery of trying to get my computer repaired. I thought I had succeeded late last night, but then my keystrokes ceased to be recognized. I tried different ports, a different keyboard...all to no avail. So, I've been on the phone with Dell for over two hours. I prefer a good root canal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he's a broken record. How many times has he pulled this stunt? Don't bother Dell just go buy you a new keyboard...it will cost much less than whatever frivolous filing you were working on.

      Delete
    2. Maybe he should check his USB port: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ae83/

      Delete
    3. It's a virus or malicious SW from those sites he visits, calling Dell will do him no good. I thought he used a laptop anyway.....more lies.

      I've never been on the phone to HP, Dell or Lenovo for more than 30 minutes. The Techs there would never spend 2 hours on the phone with any consumer, unless he started to ramble on about conspiracies.

      Delete
  19. Anyone care to guess who?

    "Nancy Evans Figat
    Tx. Hill Country Hmmm. A former friend of mine moved there.
    Like · 1 hour ago"

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is interesting. Apparently a mainstream news reporter in MT did a story on a woman with ties to NLA. In what looks like an after thought, the reporter dug deeper into the NLA. He posted what he found on a blog.

    The first comment under the article is by Elias Alias, a member of the Oath Keepers who is "authorized to speak with you publicly or in print about Oath Keepers". He writes a dissertation on SovCit rhetoric in what appears to be an attempt to educate the reporter. About 3 comments later is Paul Stramer, who is Booshie's father in law. Yep, he's all in on the SovCit and Citizen Grand Jury thing.

    Paul Stramer • 2 months ago

    I concur completely with Elias Alias below, as what he said clearly outlines the basis for the Grand Jury, and Mr. Becker should take him seriously and he should continue his studies of this issue, only leave aside the apparent bias he has for the status quo position, and try to arrive at the whole truth.

    To that end I would like to offer some research I have accumulated that might help inform.

    Here it is, and please follow all the links or you won't 'get it' as they say.

    http://www.lincolncountywatch....



    http://www.news.hypercrit.net/2014/01/09/more-on-so-called-common-law-grand-juries/#disqus_thread

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. interesting read NBTDT, thanks

      Delete
  21. I thought Bill promised a video in lieu of his Talkshoe. I guess he's failing to keep his word again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's been too busy searching through his hate .com blogs for IP addresses and running them through his intel searches, then posting names of random people on his FB page asking the lemming if they know any of them. Obsessive much? Stalker much? Manic much? How mentally unstable is he really?

      Delete
  22. because of the IP tracking that Bill is doing on all of his websites. I have a campaign going to get him blacklisted on google along with letting everyone I know what harassment he is doing. Diving to homes of those who has eith mailed him after he asked for affidaivits from them in the email and from electronic filing, I feel that this is a concern that he is abusing the court electronic filing and also maliciously using his own website to hunt down and stalk visitors from opposed people. Let people know about this. It is a danger to society. I am. they laugh alot about his ideas anyhow but its a serious matter. He does have a handgun somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ Fleming: I had the same concern about his tracking down IP's to people's houses & businesses. I was wondering how long and how often he does that. And what does he do when he gets there? Very creepy invasion of privacy. Thx for bringing it up.

      Delete
    2. You're all way behind with technology.

      Marty's been doing it for nine months now, including extracting voice prints through Facebook comments.

      Geez. What are you people, Amish?

      Delete
    3. Spamanon, I think he even has been working on getting retna scans from his posts being read

      Delete
    4. LOL - I'm only 1/2 Amish. I am never the first know about new IT technology. But if he had my IP, I envisioned him driving in circles trying to find the location of my server. But even if he has never tried it, that he think it out loud it is very creepy.

      Delete
    5. "IP addresses, in and of themselves, do not contain any personally identifiable information about you. However, if you're signed up with an Internet Service Provider (ISP) -- which is the way most of us get our Internet service -- then your ISP can easily link your IP address with your name, home address, phone number, e-mail address and even credit card information.
      Don't get paranoid just yet: In general, ISPs have fairly strict privacy policies. They won't give out your personal information to any random person who asks for it. However, under laws like the U.S. Patriot Act and through subpoenas from the police and federal agencies, an ISP may have no choice but to supply personal information related to an IP address."

      http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/how-to-tech/how-to-surf-the-web-anonymously1.htm

      Even school children know this.

      Delete
    6. Well then, that explains why I thought twice about it. I am not a school child.

      Delete
    7. I didn't mean to imply anything. Just trying to point out his bloviating.

      Delete
  23. Bill tried for 2 years to get the attention of mainstream media. It took Darash only 9 months.

    In a FOX report Darash takes exception to being called a "sovereign citizen" and says he doesn't advocate violence. He says after the ADL wrote about him, he's in fear for his life.

    The ADL listened to one of the blog talk radio interviews: Darash said the NLA would con­tact county sher­iffs about mak­ing arrests; if a sher­iff refused to make an arrest, they would indict him and go to the under­sh­er­iff. Darash con­cluded with a veiled threat: “Now there is another thing to do, if that doesn’t work. I’m not ready to speak about that until we are ready to do it. But it is an atomic bomb, it’s very strong.”

    I heard that broadcast and 3 or 4 others. Darash delivered the same message with slight variations in verbiage each time I've heard him. It sounds like a threat of future violence to me too. Darash should probably read up on how this kind of thing went for Bill's pal Carl Swennson and his group in TN.

    In an odd twist: William Taylor Reil, militiaman and CC2009 delegate, denounces NLA in an 8 page document that includes his bio and his plan for reform.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/24/tea-party-leader-says-group-seeks-to-marginalize-him-with-sovereign-citizen/

    http://blog.adl.org/tags/national-liberty-alliance

    http://www.sheriffbrigadesofpenn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/National-Liberty-Alliance-Exposed.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One Commentor made this comment, "Sovereign citizen movement? The Ioonies who think that since flags in the courtroom have yellow fringe on the them, and because their names are written in capital letters on legal documents, they don't have to follow the law?"

      I remember reading Deanna Klosotra and Maria Melinn visiting the Grand Rapids Police station or maybe it was the Sheriffs office and there were flags like that. These conspiracy ding dongs believe that means Martial Law. I was in the Army and those flags are decorative ones with the nice gold fringes on them. They are for Display only. They call them Ceremonial.

      Anyhow I laugh at this. Bill Windsor could not put up with such comments calling his group of people of Lawless America the Revolutionary Party complete conspiracy weirdos. I already heard schied say if he does not get his way he will use the 2nd amendment rights. That means force with armed weapons. I worry about this really. With as many people who are given the ideas that the "progressives" democrats are bad and destroying America and are Tyrants and are evil etc. there are many people who will do almost anything thinking they are defending the country. I believe if we wanted common law we would have it. Forcing it is not the way to do. I suggest maybe they could all move to an unoccupied pacific island and start there. Definitely this has become a debate in the lime light now. I will continue to voice my opinion against a movie to promote such things and to gain supporters for a take over of the us government.

      Delete

    2. I am paraphrasing the intent of these movements.

      This whole premiss and the related groups who want to impose their reality on my country are scary. I particularly am offended by the proposal that only things references in the King James Bible are in fact lawful. Based on the Magna Carta?? Really?


      I object, and I do think that violence is intended when they want to start militias to replace local law enforcement that does not agree with them.

      These are indeed dangerous people who want to bypass the will of the majority of the people and replace it with the will of the few who are part of their movement. They are and always will be power hungry, militant, and IMO crazy conspiracy nuts.

      Delete
    3. "Marty Prehn Not trying to keep the home fires burning Sunny. I am trying to set this country ABLAZE with Patriotism. 1 if by land and 2 if by see I will dAnd btw am looking for a few good men and LOTS of passionate women. Care to join my crusade?
      Like · Jan 17, 2011"

      Delete
  24. So I found this interesting e-mail string from 1997, right after Republic of TX Richard McLaren founder (SovCit) took hostages and had a 7 day stand off with law enforcement. Two guys are jumping all over Jon Roland about the militias.

    The simple facts of the situation are these, Mr. Roland. We have here just *ANOTHER* example of the essentially *VIOLENT* nature of the Patriot movement in general, and the militia movement in particular. Clearly after the Oklahoma City Bombing, the numerous arrests of numerous militiamen for all kinds of crimes (Starr and the Militia at Large of the Republic of Georgia, the Viper Militia, the Washington
    State Militia, the West Virginia Mountaineer Militia, etc., etc.), it is becoming clear with every violent act of the militias just how horribly dangerous you people are. No amount of your demented thinking will change these facts. If you think that any law enforcement agency at any level of government would *EVER* trust a militia, you are very much out of your mind! Hang your head in *SHAME* militiaman, hang your head in shame!

    With disgust,

    JP



    Time to go in with guns blazing. No one cares if you want to call yourself an 'freeman' and go shoot guns in the woods with a bunch of your drinking buddies, but when you start taking hostages, you're nothing more than a terrorist, and should be dealt with accordingly. I hope the hostages are safely released, but these morons need to be taken out. They are dangerous, and have shown a willingness to use violence to achieve their crazy goals. I guess its time to start those "US Murdered
    ROT" threads, eh?

    Lew Huskey


    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.activism.militia/fdCwydJATyg

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bill Windsor said “I am not now and never have been a so-called ‘sovereign’. Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups.”

    Until now it appeared that Bill supports Jon Roland and "victims of corruption" that just happened to be in the militia. But no, Bill joined the cause page for the Oathkeepers. It's a 3 'fer, he signed up under his name, Lawless America and GRIP.

    https://www.causes.com/causes/403355-oathkeepers-to-defend-our-republican-form-of-a-government-of-freedom

    Also, it appears Booshie may have forgotten to remove one of his posts impersonating Mrs. Windsor: https://www.facebook.com/getagrip.america

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And this just posted 9 hours ago

      https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=642368635799675&id=455656671162680

      Delete
    2. Great find NBTDT.
      Why does Windsor lie? Things he does and says to document his lies are found, posted and commented on. Then he screams and yells "defamation," files a suit, submits his manufactured evidence as a diversion to what he actual says and does. SMH

      Delete
    3. Thx, Ninja.

      Check this out - Crystal Cox says yep, there are radical nut jobs in Oathkeepers but if that's all you see then you are missing point.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cx8LSDL8Ieo

      Delete
    4. I agree with her when she says there are nut jobs in every aspect of life. She is one of them. She goes too far in her pursuit of her truth, which violates other people's rights. She doesn't get it either. She can justify all she wants, it won't change the truth. If you have to cross the line in your pursuit, in any way shape or form, you have no truth.

      Delete
    5. IMO, Steward Rhodes is the head radical nut job that is recruiting other nut jobs, like Cox and Bill. Rhodes' lack of understanding about what happened in New Orleans before, during and after Katrina has caused a climate in which police officers now fear for their lives in every stop and every call they answer. These groups ARE the anarchy and lawlessness the rest of us fear.

      http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/fall/oath-keepers-group-battered-by-members

      Rhodes' SovCit roots are showing in this article:

      http://www.saveamericafoundation.com/2013/07/13/thoughts-on-police-raid-on-adam-kokesh-by-stewart-rhodes-founder-and-president-of-oath-keepers/

      Delete
  27. These are interviews of Stewart Rhodes, founder of Oathkeepers by Chris Matthews and Bill O'Reilly.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cx8LSDL8Ieo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVTauxgcNEA (Matthews Part 1)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3DJyoquo-4 (Matthews Part 2)



    And is these the "radical nut jobs" Crystal talked about, or is this the point we are missing?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1TjAC7dBqc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YUF6Va8wjQ

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.