Friday, March 28, 2014

Windsor Tries To Do Math



MAGNITUDE OF THE CYBERSTALKING aka simple blogging AGAINST WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

I know some of you aren't interested in my battles against cyberstalkers actually no one is. But unfortunately, it is currently the most important issue to me personally so you gave up huh? -- more important than than the effort to expose government and judicial corruption especially since you were not really going to do that anyway. Until this is resolved, I cannot accomplish much with corruption issues you didn't accomplish one single thing before it, not one tangible accomplishment.

You might be interested to know the magnitude 7.2? or even higher? of the defamation and cyberstalking. There have been 455 published articles on Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com ummm, you pinky swore to the court that there was 320 articles posted as of Jan 7 2014, and there has been less than 30 since, you just called yourself a liar. plus 44,362 published statements by 681 screen names, 95% of which are anonymous I think you missed a few, go count again. Based on my calculations, there are 3,312,027 words in the 455 articles and comments given your kind of "calculations" I can see why the IRS would need some further information from you. According to a study mentioned in Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use, the average person writes 19 words-per-minute when composing. This means 174,317 hours were spent by the 681 screen names as they composed ok so 174,000/681=255 hours over a two year period which equals 1.5% of their time, thats about right Bill, you take up about 1.5% of my time, maybe 2%. There are 8,760 hours in a 365-day year its almost April Bill, you shouldn't be able to read, much less do math, what will Uncle Sam think?. This means 20 years of 24/7 time was spent composing plus an untold number of years spent reading by the 681 "people uhhh, now you lost me." The average adult reads prose text at 250 to 300 words per minute but in this case we are reading cons. While proofreading materials, people are able to read at 200 wpm on paper, and 180 wpm on a monitor. Assuming 180 words-per-minute for me whoa whoa....you think you are anywhere close to "average"?, it will take me 306.67 hours JUST to read what has been written and at least 408,579 hours to understand it. Assuming I can stay at it eight hours a day why just 8? You have nothing else to do, you just said it, lets bump that up to at least 14, it will take two-and-a-half months for me to do a first read all the hands go up at this point....shouldn't you have read it before you filed it in the court and called it defamation?  Or is this like the Minority Report thing where you know its defamation even before you read it?. Joeyisalittlekid is just one of the blogs what blogs?  there is more blogs with this name?. I have identified dozens of them "dozens" is a word liars use to say I didn't really count. Then there are videos and talkshoes. One of the defendants, Sean D. Fleming, has 561 videos of his own on his YouTube site oh yeah, from the Sean Fleming Show. There are perhaps 700 or more videos and radio programs that need to be reviewed, many of which have been hidden from me. And I have no way to determine the identity of these people without court orders or law enforcement intervention and you will never get that so is this you waiving the white flag finally?

In Texas, I cannot find a reported case that is ANYTHING like my case thats because they get thrown out immediately. If anyone knows of a defamation case anywhere in history I think US courts usually like to cite US cases, taking it to the world court now are we? involving this much stuff, I'd love to know about it. Maybe I can read up on any such cases "in my spare time." hahahaha, that is so funny

Then in the comments section, we get some tinfoil Billy:

Bill Windsor How could a group of people justify spending 20 years of time publishing comments defaming me and others? I just have to wonder if someone hasn't paid some or all of these people.

213 comments:

  1. "all the hands go up at this point....shouldn't you have read it before you filed it in the court and called it defamation? Or is this like the Minority Report thing where you know its defamation even before you read it?."

    No kidding!! I thought he swore under penalty of perjury that he had too. So what is the truth here again? Are the courts just supposed to accept the written words on a piece of paper where he "swears" to something as a "crime," but what he just admitted was a complete lie? It's full of defamation (in his mind) yet he can't pin point any of it, other than to say that xxxx # of "Statements" (which are actually opinion based comments) are all defamatory. So, I guess this one is too? I am asking questions based on his comments, which are my opinions yet it is a statement to him? Previously he made a long boring post about the things he says were defamation, of which I am pretty sure every single one of them can be proven to have been based on something he did or said. Proof to discredit much of what he claims, has also been shown in pictures and screenshots, proving he is actually a liar. Actual proof, not Billy proof.

    Oh, love the picture BTW. His excuse about his little "Press pass" to excuse stalking is perfect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't imagine how many Windsor Torts "Comment Overflow" violates. I shudder to think

      Delete
    2. "And I have no way to determine the identity of these people without court orders or law enforcement intervention"

      Then he goes on to say this...

      "Bill Windsor Wow, Marty! I have IP addresses that Google provided as well as a large number of IP addresses gathered from some other websites. We need to compare. As I have shown in the Soushie case, folks are often mistaken that a proxy server will hide their identity."

      So, which one is it? Does he have the names or doesn't he? Is he so busy writing dramatic "stories" he forgets what he actually wrote, and contradicts himself in the same moment? Or are Marty and Bill pretending once again, using their "intimidation" or "sting" tactics to scare everyone into silence like they have tried so many times in the past?

      Delete
  2. I see a blocking in Gerard's future:

    Gerard Beloin I believe you are altruistic but losing sight of the big picture. Judicial corruption issues supersede your defamation lawsuits. If you lose track of the big picture, they will continue to yank the defamation chain forever to prevent you from your original and more important goal. Exposing judicial corruption.

    Mr. Beloin is running for a US Senate seat, New Hampshire. And wow, does he have a story to tell.

    http://gbforussenate.com/2014-01-01%20-%20LETTER%20to%20NH%20law%20enforcement.pdf

    Also LMAO ""all the hands go up at this point....shouldn't you have read it before you filed it in the court and called it defamation?"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bwahaha! You brought the funny back, thank you. Hilarious article.






    ReplyDelete
  4. One of the lemmings posted 3 links to stories about defamation cases in TX. I wonder if she actually read them. The last one posted is about the former Mayor of Kemah, who filed lawsuits, pro se, against 10 people for "actions he asserted “induced disparaging, hostile and disagreeable opinions or feelings against (him).” A news report says, the Mayor claims the 10 people worked with others to damage him for political reasons. Two defendants have been absolved by a jury, 3 have been dismissed from the litigation.

    https://setexasrecord.com/news/290858-jury-determines-local-man-did-not-defame-former-kemah-mayor

    http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/bay_area/news/ex-kemah-mayor-files-seven-million-lawsuits-alleging-defamation/article_eabb2d57-7411-569f-9a32-60e975384206.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here's an interesting news report re: ^^^^^^ and one of the guys that got dismissed.

      "Carl Joiner and Bryan Sawyer, who say they haven’t been served yet, claim Wiggins’ lawsuit is without grounds because he fails to identify the defamatory statements that he accuses the defendants of publicly making about him."

      "Wiggins would have to identify the alleged defamatory statements and prove that the statements about him were false and made with malice, Joiner’s motion states."

      http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/bay_area/news/defendants-ask-court-to-dismiss-ex-kemah-mayor-s-lawsuits/article_0d8b5148-40e0-5e69-a590-60cff5ee5ffa.html

      Delete
    2. Bill Windsor Roby, thanks for these excellent articles!!!

      I think he just read the headlines.

      http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/125-million-jury-verdict-texas-internet-defamation-case

      http://abcnews.go.com/Business/jury-awards-13-million-texas-defamation-suit-anonymous/story?id=16194071

      Delete
    3. Lololol, he sees what he wants to see....from headlines, because he can't be bothered with reading anything that isn't about him.

      Delete
    4. LOL ya, he just gets too excited when he sees dollar signs.

      "In the end, the judge determined that the Leshers could not prove the people they were suing were the ones who posted the libelous messages."

      "Charlie Doescher, one of the plaintiffs, said nothing about the lawsuit filed against him ever made sense.

      "The first time I was served the papers was the first time I'd ever heard the name,” he said."

      (I think Rory now understands the link was not so good to post. LOL)

      Delete
    5. Lol,yeah,I read those links and all I could think was these are not in BIll's favor. I was confused as to why he thanked someone for posting these links on his page.

      His reading comprehension is still broken I guess ;)

      Delete
  5. How desperate does someone have to be to accept information from Marty Prehn?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd love to see the email from Marty to Bill. " Here is where Fleming lives, add him to your lawsuit in Irving".

      Delete
    2. I was laughing so hard when I read that. What a moron!!

      Delete
    3. Maybe Marty needs to change his "special agent" hat to "Captain Obvious"

      Delete
  6. I think bills math is off because he forgot to divide by pie

    ReplyDelete
  7. As I plow through 20 years of data entry on the primary cyberstalking Google BlogSpot site, I come across documents that have been altered. I have the original emails in my computer. But the documents on the website contain additional sentences that paint me to be a horrible person. Then the Joeys feed off it and make it a huge defamation frenzy.

    The question is: Did Ginger Snap (believed to be xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx) falsify the documents, or was it Allie Overstreet, who gave the confidential documents to the Joeys?

    Inquiring minds want to know. But having this evidence is WONDERFUL. Nothing like documents that you can prove were falsified to help support malice and tortious interference.
    — at Higginsville, MO
    Cover Photos · 21 minutes ago ·

    How desperate is he to try and scare anyone he can? He's starting to sound more like Marty every day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or the third more probably story, Windsor now knows there isn't defamation, because we are commenting on the things he has done, and he will go in and delete the stuff he wrote that paints him to be a horrible person.

      Delete
    2. but Bill deleted all those emails...in fact he is asking google to give them back to him. Again, which lie is it?

      Delete
    3. We must remember BW was in business with mitt Romney which makes him a questionable business man doing acquisitions. Remember in 2012 elections when they looked at Romney and Bain Capitol the company that was in a joint venture with Bill. To think what ever happened to 1st communications? Why did it fail?

      Delete
    4. 20 years of data entry but Bill is going to read it in only 2.5 months in 8 hour/day settings. Really, to be fair then, isn't it more like 60 years of data entry? How come Bill is the only one who gets to work 8 hour days?

      So by my crazy Bill math, it takes 2.5 months to read what it takes 60 years to write. Yeah, that sounds about as logical as his sworn court documents.

      Oh, so a month or so ago Bill was asking Google for copies of his own emails, but now that he's claiming published emails were forged, he miraculously is a great record keeper?

      Ha ha Bill. I've seen your spreadsheets. No wonder you think data entry people would type at 19 words a minute. That's probably lightening fast in your head.

      Delete
    5. Lol, I can think and type at the same time. I type about 110 words a minute. Your math sucks as always Windsor.

      Delete
    6. LMAO so he calculated this morning there is 20 years of information here. Now, it's just a solid fact to him. Making the post claiming reading through 20 years of data....OMG! So, this is what he does? Comes up with some twisted theory, and then just keeps using it? I am LMAO right now.

      He seems to be really flustered, and he's melting down.

      Delete
    7. Bill has his own game of "telephone" going on in his head.

      Delete
    8. Omg, when he says the documents here contain extra sentences,is he talking about the editorial comments added like in this post? Could he be that oblivious?

      Delete
    9. Lol Ollie, I think you are right. I also think he has people like. Marty and Mary d on speed dial in there too ;)

      Delete
    10. Okay, seriously? Does the guy forget that even if emails were altered (they weren't), the original is still on two sets of drives and two sets of account archives? One of them being mine? Puhleeeeze, what if, just what if, it's not the infamous Gingersnap or the meanie Allie that is the liar? Ponder that a moment. The guy is lost in his own labyrinth. SMH

      Delete
    11. Allie he is implying about the email that you got from him about the highly confidential one that said he can not have the company in his name. You should make a copy of it and share so it will prove he is wrong.

      Delete
    12. Sean I don't know why he'd be implying just that particular email, that's just the one email out of them all that interests YOU. And I'm not sure why that'd be confidential other than he probably doesn't want it "getting out". Making a copy and sharing it doesn't prove squat. Only the original, still in my yahoo box, seen by someone of some authority, would prove he sent it and it said what it said. I'd be happy to do that. I've offered, but he doesn't wanna play that. Maybe you can talk him into it. Also, really, it's wrong, shitty, immoral, shady, etc, to think about hiding a company from debtors. But it's not illegal. At least not what I have in the email. It makes the guy a douche, not an axe murderer. Now, I know you'll take that as me making excuses, covering up, or protecting windbag. Whatever, but I am on the side against Bill whether you think so or not. If it's through court, I'd be happy to "share" all 1400 or so emails. Well, I already did in Missouri.

      Delete
    13. it is illegal to put the company in his wifes name without her consent.

      Delete
    14. or maybe the company is not fake and barbara is the director if so, then I will expose that she is the mastermind behind it all.

      Delete
    15. I don't know, but the email I have doesn't say anything about his wife.

      Delete
    16. my emails say from bill, to Dave & Trish all releases signed must be mailed to Barb to her Georgia PO,box soon as posable .

      Delete
    17. barbara even got the mail for the company. shes a liar

      Delete
    18. Personally, I think he's just being dramatic. Whomever said that he might be talking about the bolded commentary like in this post, is probably correct. Bill probably knows exactly what that is, it's not even in dirst person, so it's pretty obvious. But, he can claim ignorance.

      His goal has always been to bully, scare, and divide. Why would this be any different. He lies all the time but does it in a way that he can usually have an out through double meaning, omission, or pleading naivete.

      Allie would know if anything she shared was altered. So his goal is to make Ginger question the emails/Allie or the resy of us to question Ginger, the emails, or Allie.

      Ultimately, if they were altered before being given to Ginger, that's not his responsibility. It's reasonable to believe any emails we've seen attributed to Windsor are in fact from Windsor. His tone rings through, and "forging" them would be ridiculous because there are always at least two parties involved who have copies as well as the email service provider who might still have archives.

      Which...is exactly why he doesn't specify which emails and what statements. It's just part of his game to get people to question everything. He doesn't want to give enough info that he can be disproven. This is exactly how he files court documents. Broad sweeping accusations. Impossible to defend point by point because he gives none. He's too dumb to see that it works against him.

      But the man has never ever had focus in his life. There is soo much evidence of that. And unlike Bill, I can point to several pieces of concrete evidence of his "acomplishments" vs promises over the last 30 years. In fact, I could go all the way back to college with him.

      Ask yourself, why does a serial entrepreneur and business executive have to reference his college days in every business profile he shares? That's over forty five years ago. Shouldn't there be tons that is more relevant by now? Sure, you meet another Delt or TTU alumna and you swap stories, but otherwise? Why?

      Oh yeah, because those were his best years. The ones where he played with the kids that became big boys.

      Bill never left the sand box.

      Delete
    19. AMPP in Ks is in his name

      Delete
  8. This is probably the same math that made all of his companies that he acquisitioned went poof again

    ReplyDelete
  9. If a little and relatively unknown blog can effectively halt a revolution, think what an organized political party, or even a group of Cub Scouts, could do to stop him...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spam your so right. His entire movement really is lame and dead now. Everyone has left to join the NLA. I spoke to that guy at the ADL who wrote about the NLA, He told me normally these groups only last about a year. I think Lawless America is past a year but is dead. A movie or a documentary that is on some website somewhere is not going to affect anyone. These low budget, low audience films normally get little attention. Anyone who was going to support the Revolutionary Party in any real means has moved on. It is amazing that just talking about it has set him on this flurry of lawsuits. I have never called him a name at all. I have said though his idea is bad, his intentions to hold grand juries is bad and along those lines.

      Delete
    2. I feel accomplished I have done a duty to my countrymen and I am a patriot for sticking up against a movement of those who wanted to take over by force via grand Juries.

      Delete
    3. I do too, Flemming! You have stood your ground & not allowed his huffing & puffing to intimidate you! You & everyone else are entitled to their opinions. We can say his blather is ignorant & quoted his own words while laughing at the absurdity. It's not like we drove by his house, with a telescopic lens. We've commented on what he's made PUBLIC.
      And? Your attorney is a freaking Rock Star ★!! She nails his vexi ass with his own billshcit! I'm reading her latest work now & it is an award winner! Her & Google's attorney chick, Shannon? A dynamic duo!
      Don'tchya know his head will spin counter-clockwise when he reads his own vomitrocious spew slung back at him? bwahahahahahaha giggle giggle snort! Even Special Aagent Douche Canoe will hang his fat head in shame!

      Awwww...it's a beautiful spring day! I love Saturday mail.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    4. The revolutionary party was just satire. Can't you take a joke here?

      Delete
  10. Hahahaha HILARIOUS article... Oh and welcome to the paid troll club Ginger!!LMFAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Heh. Thanks. Those checks take forever. It's not nearly as glamorous as they make it sound

      Delete
    2. hmm Why did ILL Bill not add you or Dawn to his lawsuit? Dawn in SC, you two are helping Sean post crap and supporting him.... Sarah you gave him the lies about one person that proved he is full of shit, just saying you used ILL Bill for proxy of abuse, then now is helping Sean F... I am sure Julia Flecter can gave Dawn Address to ILL Bill, she has been all over this Blog in Support of Sean F

      Delete
  11. Btw, I wonder if everyone noticed I put in the wiki link in the article, not bills

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ROTF! I'm glad you pointed that out, I missed it.

      Delete
  12. Oh no, Bill has another reasonable free thinking lemming on his hands. This was under the forgery post - could be trouble.

    Roby McKinney I am sorry Mary, for all that you have been through, and your need to get it said, but my question and comment was directed to Bill and about these "falsified documents" he has posed the deeply disturbing question about.

    I personally don't like being manipulated and inflamed with suggestions about some other persons quasi criminal behavior unless one is willing to in fact let me see the evidence and then I can judge it for myself.

    With what I have been through and experienced, I don't believe anyone any more and specially NOT Lawyers and ones who don't put up and show their proof, but go around relying on their ability to convince others about things with only their inflammatory and prejudicial suggestions that they often make simply by asking provocative questions.

    So if you are going to try to provoke me, then please at least do me the courtesy of being willing to show me your evidence and let me decide for myself what to believe.

    I do hope that Bill understands what I am saying, because I believe that I am much like one hopes the jury will be. Even though I am well aware that juries are easily manipulated and inflamed, most readily by attorney's, I don't think one should rely that much on that particular skill and technique as it can and does sometimes backfire! Bill should be prepared, as it will in fact be done to him by the other side! And when it is done by both sides, a jury may in fact just throw their hands up in disgust and give him an award of nothing, and that goes for the Judge as well. Prove everything to be on the safe side!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She said "I don't believe anyone any more and specially NOT Lawyers and ones who don't put up and show their proof, but go around relying on their ability to convince others about things with only their inflammatory and prejudicial suggestions that they often make simply by asking provocative questions." Yet, she believes every inflammatory and unproven allegation Bill posts? WTH?

      Delete
    2. Ah, ok, sorry, my bad. I went to see the page, and she did question Bill too about proving what he is claiming. Good for her!

      "Roby McKinney- Care to let anyone else see them, or is this just to let them know not to try to use them or else? Interesting tactic, however it could back fire. Things have a way of doing that when there is corruption in the machine. Don't they have some rules written somewhere prohibiting threatening to bring criminal charges on litigants in a civil case to gain advantage? I know I have read something on it. I know the Judge won't get involved, he will most likely tell you to take it to the DA if you think a crime has been committed. At least that has been my experience. The DA will say, no can do, its in the hands of the Judge. Round and round you go, with their run around, just like a hot potato."
      "

      Delete
    3. Thanks, Ninja. I meant to post her first request for "production" but forgot.

      Delete
    4. No problem. I was wondering why she would question Mary and not Bill (although if she has been around LA for any length of time, she would realize that this is all Mary does with her by and through blah blah and should know Mary D is as much of a broken, unsubstantiated record as Bill is)

      I noticed that Bill went cricket quiet. Usually does when anyone has a valid question for him, or he gets all uppity and superior with the "How dare you question me" attitude followed by a "You must be a Joey" mantra, "get out."

      Delete
    5. That is one really articulate commenter. Are they new? Where has that person been?
      Wow! If they were new? It's short lived, because all those well spoken words will get them zapped to the lost/banished lemming line so fast, their head will spin!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    6. LMAO - I'm starting to like Roby. Yeah, that "vague booking" thing might just back fire on Bill's arse.



      Susan Harbison FB posts like the one Bill wrote here are called "vague booking". The author usually has a reason for writing the post as he did and that reason is not always apparent to every reader. I can't imagine how anyone would be manipulated, provoked, or inflamed by something that obviously does not provide them with the full story. I just read the post and proceed accordingly!
      8 hours ago · Edited · Like

      Roby McKinney " I can't imagine how anyone would be manipulated, provoked, or inflamed by something that obviously does not provide them with the full story." I think You made my point exactly. It is the suggestive with no evidence, to me that is inflaming. I have to trust in the speaker. Not that Bill doesn't have a reason to say it, but what is it for, if not to inflame readers? Certainly not to inform is it? Or there would be some necessary evidence attached to show what the basis of it is. It is not totally baseless for sure, (I hope not anyway.)

      "vaque booking" as you call it, is what I believe I see Lawyers often do to inflame the passions and prejudices of a jury. They understand all they have to do is suggest it, and not necessarily prove it, because often they can't, but it gets the job done anyway! Winning in court is in theatrics!

      What I wrote was a caution to Bill, that is what he is going to be up against. They are reading this too!

      He should come to court with his forgery evidence in hand, and ready to prove it, and don't rely on them to take heed of his warnings, if that is what he put it here for.
      2 hours ago · Like

      Delete
    7. LOL Susan is such a double talking troll. Here, if anyone posts anything, she demands proof and links. But, then she says she doesn't go to the links and just wants the proof.

      Delete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Who is Yappy, and why does Bill want to tt her some badly as posted on his Facebook page???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ 10:25 - I suspect you are a troll, making sure attention is brought to Bill's latest post. It appears, by that post, that somebody is still trying to play Bill.

      Delete
    2. Interesting divide and conquer fail.

      Delete
    3. I see it as Bill's desperate attempts to obtain information that he pretends he already has, but makes well known he doesn't. Seems he sends out these desperate messages when he's been dealt with a stiff dose of STFU and PTFD, you are SOL from the courts.

      Delete
    4. Good point, Ninja. He's out of options again re: attempts to intimidate. More of that "vague booking" stuff.

      Delete
    5. Lol, oh Bill, you really think that will work? SMH, why would anyone call you? OMG. I can't stop laughing

      Delete
    6. Good point Ninja, hasn't he already said he knows who everyone is? Didn't he post that he had addresses and phone numbers? I guess he was making it up. Wow Bill, you didn't think this through very well lmao

      Delete
    7. ohhhh, Billy has been cleaning house! I went back to check my memory - I recall he posted that he was stalking two people in Weatherford and he posted identifying information on both. He claimed one is yappy. That post has been deleted.

      Delete
    8. He can't delete the motions he filed trying to add both of the ladies in Weatherford to the suit.

      Delete
    9. Yep, and bragged about it. Maybe he should expect his answers through the court.

      "Weatherford is an interesting little place West of Fort Worth. It is home to two of the most vicious cyberstalkers ever to walk the face of the Internet. Two things, both recently named as defendants in William M. Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et al.

      I mailed these things a letter today with a copy of the lawsuit, the motion adding them, and an affidavit that they can sign and swear if they want to claim they aren't the Wicked Witches of Weatherford."

      Delete
    10. Someone with a level head needs to sort this out.

      Where is Agent Prehn when you need him?

      Delete
    11. Agent Prehn may not have a level head but there's definitely a bubble in there somewhere.

      Delete
    12. Do you think Windsor physically stomps his feet and wrinkles up his face yelling at his PC? I like to think so. He's the biggest junior high kid I've ever seen.

      Delete
    13. That's giving him a level of maturity not supported by the facts, I'm afraid.
      If I were to re-name this blog, I'd choose: billyisalittlekidtoo.

      Delete
    14. Susan Harbison
      Maybe she's upset about the fact that someone gave up her real name? That WOULD be annoying. Come baaaaaack Yappy come baaaaaaack, lmao.
      Like · 1 · 2 hours ago

      If that was the right name, why did he put the location on his post as Houston? He claims Yappy is a person in Weatherford. Catch up Susan, it cant work both ways.

      Delete
    15. Bob I think bill should read up not just on tax law but also on tax fraud and also on corporate fraud.

      Delete
    16. Since Susan (allegedly Sharon Galloway) is so excited about this information, perhaps she is the lemming feeding Windsor false info. She sure seems to be sarcastic enough about how it WOULD be annoying and all. (and it wouldn't be the first time she uses a fake name...) Just a thought

      Delete
  15. So what's up with Windsor and his new bestie Susan anyway? He said he wanted corrections and retractions from her, and now he's over there chatting away with her. LMAO wow, that is so funny. Does he not remember that? or is he so desperate to talk to someone she will do? Ahahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. And didn't Snoozan say the best thing for us is for Bill to sue her too?

      Alligator mouth, tweety bird arse.

      Delete
    2. I love your satire!

      Delete
  16. Dear Bill and trolls,

    Whomever fed Bill is wrong as wrong can be but at least their fantasies get them through the night. smh

    http://oi62.tinypic.com/28bs4ci.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perfect pic!

      PS...Better GENI than ANII!

      Delete
    2. Lmao,brilliant and funny.

      Delete
    3. Giggle snort~
      He's such a brainiac~

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    4. http://i58.tinypic.com/b692xz.gif

      Delete
  17. Susan Harbison Maybe she's upset about the fact that someone gave up her real name? That WOULD be annoying. Come baaaaaack Yappy come baaaaaaack, lmao.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1

    Bill Windsor I suspect there is more to it. If I were a Joey, I'd be VERY upset about the published articles and comments that I believe establish animosity, malice, and tortious interference. If the Joeys haven't read up on joint and several liability and conspiracy, that would make some good bedtime reading at about 3 am when they stop publishing defamation.
    3 hours ago · Like

    Susan Harbison Could beeeee.
    2 hours ago · Like

    Bill Windsor Someone with your first name warned them many times.
    about an hour ago · Like

    Susan Harbison You mean me? I warned them many times, but they are much smarter than I. They are absolutely certain that they understand the limitations of the First Amendment and that ALL of their statements qualify as protected opinion. I disagree but I hold no opinion as to how the court will handle the case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If her tongue was stuck any farther up Bill's ass she'd be able to taste what he's eating for dinner.

      Delete
    2. "I disagree but I hold no opinion as to how the court will handle the case."

      Wow! What a cop out, Sharon V. You go on about owning your sh*t but then you deny its existence in the same sentence. I'm absolutely sure if the case goes against Windsor you'll claim you knew it all along and that it's just another instance of judicial corruption.

      Delete
    3. Cooky, I've heard of loyal troops bringing up the rear, but in Snoozan's case that's way too far!

      Delete
  18. I think, for all the crazy talk out there....saying this is a hate blog or some kind of agenda blog so on...they all miss the point. This blog is A. only connected to itself and B. Is mainly a parody blog and always has been. I would think the pictures alone would give that away. I mock people who have inserted themselves into a public role. Those that try to persuade others into following them and their agenda, and who say and do stupid things are the target of my ridicule. If my parody helps others to see through these public figures, then all the better.

    When Bill first found this blog his initial assessment of it was the closest to correct. He called us all the Joey Jokesters, and frankly, I would accept that label. The hate blog, the RICO conspiracy stuff and so on, is just him descending further in his own delusions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you GS! As for views on parody, I so resemble that statement.

      Delete
    2. My objections to this blog have always been more about the insanely vicious comments of a few people rather than what was posted by the author of JIALK. Actually, there is only one person whom I thought crossed the line to the extent that I thought there should be censoring by GS.

      Delete
    3. Mr Webb, it seems to me that you are trying to provoke someone into attacking you again. Is your need to be a victim so great you want to be attacked? Wouldn't it be easier to just have your latest "boy toy" dress up in leather and whip you? I'd like to suggest he use a ball gag on you or maybe handcuff you to something so you can't type. That should help you with your fetish and spare us having to read you trying to get your satisfaction here.

      Delete
    4. RCIII this is a perfect example of his passive aggressiveness (that he says he's never been called before, which I find hard to believe). He comes here, starts some shit, then runs around playing victim. I see him as the instigator.

      Just like in his biased articles, and his helpful "tips" to others.

      Delete
    5. Just the tip...

      Delete
    6. Don't forget the standard Webb line "I don't know what you're talking about"!

      Delete
    7. Yet another Sharon V. splatter on Aisle 6 (hint: Google it).

      Delete
    8. You would think the son of the joke writer for WC Fields would understand humor and parodies a little better. Sheesh, no sense of humor, when he offers so much material!!

      Delete
    9. Speaking of WC Fields, here's Billy Butthurt's best quote ever:

      "All things considered, I'd rather be in litigation."

      Delete
    10. Although I wasn't thinking of Crockpot Bob when I wrote that, it seems to have struck a sensitive nerve.

      Delete
    11. It didn't strike a nerve, just made me pity you. Why is your identity so connected to being a victim? I guess now you can claim I'm attacking you. You're welcome.

      Delete
    12. Your crockpot is full of it.

      Delete
    13. At least you didn't say you don't know what I'm talking about. That's progress!!

      Delete
    14. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    15. That was an interesting comment Mr Webb. It's a shame you deleted it.

      Delete
    16. I don't know what you are talking about.

      Delete
    17. If you're having trouble remembering what you wrote, I can repost it for you. Then I could make my witty comment about Dauben stew!

      Delete
    18. Well, if you think you can make me or anyone else laugh, by all means do it.

      Delete
    19. I'm not trying to entertain you. Just doing my best to help you with your need to be a victim. If you're over it now I'll be glad to just be quiet for the night.

      Delete
    20. I do not consider myself a victim, far from it. I've fought more powerful people than anonymous cowards on a blog who hide behind screen names. If you think you can prove otherwise, have at it.

      Delete
    21. You're right. You don't hide behind a screen name, anonymous people can't garner sympathy. You need to have your name out there so you can cry about being attacked.

      Delete
    22. I'm not looking for sympathy. I don't need it.

      Delete
    23. Then what ARE you looking for here, David? Ye gads. You just go on and on and on. It's quite telling, whether you realize, or will admit it, or not. I wish you had activities and hobbies, and good friends and loved ones, and a life that was so busy with good things you wouldn't even think of coming here and going on and on and on again with your standard nonsense.

      Delete
    24. I look for the truth. Why are you here if it is such a futile endeavor? And why was the comment asking about Crockpot's possible homophobia deleted? Seems like a fair question to me.

      Delete
    25. The homophobia question was deleted because it was posted by a troll, not because of the content. Mr Webb I know it disappoints you to hear this but I could care less about your sexual preference. What I don't like is you coming on this blog to try to draw someone into attacking you just because you thrive on being a victim. You wanted the homophobe question left up just because it gives you another reason to claim you're being attacked here. Get over yourself David, nobody here cares enough about you to attack you. The fact that you keep returning here just so you can cry about the way you're treated is disturbing. If I'm treated badly somewhere, I don't have any urge to return. Why keep commenting here?

      Delete
    26. I come on this blog because I am trying to see both sides of the dispute between you and Bill Windsor. I also visit his Facebook Page. You are the one in the attack mode, not me.

      Delete
    27. That is true. Crockpot came on the scene sort of late. Mysterious.

      Delete
    28. That's what I'm saying Webb! It gives me pause, lol!

      Delete
    29. I'm concerned Crockpot's equipment has ceased slow-cooking and started to overheat. This could be dangerous!

      Delete
    30. Could be! He needs to open his lid, turn down the gas, lower his flame, etc.
      Things are obviously too hot for him to handle!

      Delete
    31. Webb, I understand you're still heartbroken over losing a newfound love interest to the prison system. That hurt will fade as the years go by. It's a shame you won't live until he is released. There are other child rapist in the sea, maybe you'll find another one.

      Delete
    32. Crockpot, I barely know Joey Dauben. He is sort of a little guy. I'm in the range of about 6 foot 2 inches, and I like guys in my same size range in all respects. You are an obvious fool. Joey Dauben was an interesting story, nothing more. Anything I have done in regard to writings letters, etc. since his incarceration was an act of kindness. That is obviously something a creep like you can't understand.

      Delete
    33. Wow. Looks like "Crockpot" is the one who struck a nerve. Take your friend Susan's advice Webb, lighten up and laugh along.

      Delete
    34. Yeah, I can do that. Good advice.

      Delete
    35. I read Crockpot's rant again. Unbelievably sick. I hope he doesn't prove to be the person I have been told he is.

      Delete
    36. Based on your past attempts at outing people here, I'm sure I'm not who you have been told I am.

      Delete
    37. Robert isn't the creep here. There is nothing normal when a journalist writes letters to child rapists.

      Delete
    38. Are you delusional? Reporters love interviews with convicted criminals. My best ever was with a young man who stabbed his older lover to death, chopped up his body and spread the body parts over a ranch near Hillsboro. At some point I plan to interview Joey Dauben in prison, and you will eagerly read every word of it. In the meantime, I keep the line of communication open. Also, I'm glad to read today on Bill Windsor that Crockpot lives in another county, but I have no interest in outing him or anyone else.

      Delete
    39. So what county do I live in this week. I can't keep up with who I am or where I live because it changes to much.

      Delete
  19. Just heard that a subpoena and notice of deposition is on it's way to Barbara Windsor, Ryan. And other family members.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait, did Billy just depose his own ex-family? I've heard of whizzing in one's own gene pool, but dang, that is *seriously* dysfunctional. It makes the Borgias look like the Von Trapps!

      Delete
    2. Maybe that is because his brother has contacted a few people.

      Delete
    3. Ya, I heard they already confirmed a date on like April12th at like The Sims Library

      Delete
    4. I thought it was going to be at the local Bakery...next to the pies?

      Delete
    5. Saturday is always a good day. No corporate events or meetings. If there is a sudden conflict there should be proof or sanctions

      Delete
    6. Yeah, I heard the library said they would be open for the 5 hours that are scheduled. They even (from what I heard are going to rent it out at 1K per hour since it's a Saturday and all) that's ok though Bill will have to pay for that later anyway so it's all good, Im sure.

      Delete
  20. It's Joeypalooza, Home Edition! Fun for the whole family!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I see Bill has upgraded us to 'gagsters' again. And he seems to think he is still doing depositions. In other news, he is once again calling Ginger Snap a she. I guess he can't decide who he wants anyone to be. Since he hasn't gotten anyone right, he is just going to keep harassing innocent people, and making threats via his demands for depositions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First he nick named us the "Joeys" then he made a video calling us sick, sick bastards and bitches, now we are "gangsters" but wouldn't that be "gangsta" to be true Gangsta?

      Delete
    2. I think we're incorrigible rascal hooligans.

      Just saying...

      Delete
    3. It would indeed be Gangsta

      Delete
    4. Yo! Snaps fo life~ *throws deuces*

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
  22. "Bill Windsor- You're right, Mary. Noah's Ark will not be big enough for all the species of sick people in the Joeys gang."

    Guess Bill forgot that all those who loaded up on the ark were saved...all the rest just got washed away. We'll fair just fine Billy Boy!! Can't say the same for your tank ass!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are we going to have to pair up again, like when we were going to jail?

      Dibs on Petunia...

      Delete
    2. Hell yeah, Spam... Me & you! (If Bob says it's ok, we're married you know)

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
  23. LOL, yes, those in the ark will be fine. I must admit, I'm confused as to how this Noah's ark even became part of the conversation, until I considered the source.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is it legal in Texas to record phone calls without consent? Billy is babbling again

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, as long as one person involved in the conversation is aware of the recording.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That didn't come out right - it's not illegal to record your own phone calls. But it's certainly not very nice to record without telling the other person.

      The bigger issue is: Bill is stalking people that have nothing to do with this blog and harassing their family members and doesn't have a clue why he got cussed out? Polite message or not, he should have never made that call.

      Delete
    2. It's crossing boundaries so of course bill doesn't get it. And it would be obvious that dragging more uninvolved people in for his merit less attempt at deposition is wrong, to everyone except Bill.

      He wants everyone in the world to be a Joey. SMH

      Delete
    3. Texas has a one party consent rule, so if 2 people (you and another person) are talking, and you agree then everything is good

      Delete
    4. Thanks for the info nbtdt, I sorta hope they all record every conversation. I'd like to know what Bill deems polite, and if the deposition came up at all in the message he left.

      Delete
    5. I had the same thought. I want to hear the "polite message" that was left. Polite is such a subjective word.

      And he's going to expose the guy for what exactly? Getting mad for being harassed?

      Delete
    6. Yep,that sounds like what he is saying. Either that, or for being friends with someone who doesn't like him. Bill has rules about fraternizing with those he deems enemies. Somehow, they are all joeys too. Yeah, I know it makes no sense...

      Delete
    7. Windsor probably believes he left a "polite" message like he believes he doesn't stalk people, or harass them, or has a legitimate reason to sue people.

      Windsor is a big, fat bully, a vexatious asshole, who's sole purpose in life is to be a menace to as many people as possible. In my humble opinion. (hey, check that out Bill...I did what you did right there.) Booyah

      Delete
    8. Snoozie hasn't read the Stay Order!
      Oh my! She's outta the info loop!
      Yes, the judge issued a stay.
      Duh.
      Bill obviously isn't sharing the real truth of what's gone on this far! Imagine that!

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    9. Snoozie comments to Vexi on his Facebook page: I haven't seen the stay order. Does it specifically state that you cannot continue to conduct discovery?

      Delete
    10. What You didn't ask your Willy to see it? Seriously? After all your blathering about not taking people's words for anything? And, you will simply believe what he tells you without proof? Wow you really are a fence walking troll. hahahahah hop on your broom, and scoot on out of here.... you are in the gangsta zone...which is a big no-no to your little Willy.

      Delete
    11. Nope, it don't take much to make my day. Every day is a happy day for me.
      I especially like when bucket moufs like you prove you don't know the latest details of what you blather about.
      As Bob said, remove face & head, get caught up. That Stay? Weeks old. It's been around. You're obviously outta the loop, everywhere.

      #mylifeISgood #happy

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    12. Hahaha Snoozie Anon...a bit touchy? Since you were all sticking you witchy poo nose into RM's comments, trying to act all superior, you now look like an even bigger brown nose, pot stirring troll than before. Hahahaha contradict yourself at every turn, then get your depends all bunched up that old prune wrinkled ass.

      Delete
    13. Oh look...Snoozie is spun out tonight. Must be taking some of Webb's selective memory pills. Hahaha

      Delete
    14. "The comments here indicate the GENII believe I am very closely involved in this litigation. Why am I not surprised to see that since you don't know anything for sure, you have simply made up your own reality, lol. Some things never change."

      If you're not "closely involved" & obviously you're not remotely involved, it's not for your lack of trying.
      Re-insert face & perhaps you can absorb some of the actual goings on via osmosis, as he receives them, immediately flowed by spinning spews~

      Yawn! Stretch!
      My day in the sunshine, soaking up happy, has exhausted me!
      Spew on Snoozie, I'm hopping

      Delete
    15. Oops! *hopping in the bed*. Don't wanna miss a minute of gorgeous spring sunshine tomorrow!

      Delete
    16. Give it a minute... He's fishing for everything about you, too, on all his vexi filings:)

      Delete
  26. LOL yes Billy, why don't you tell Snoozan about the stay? You know the one the Judge wrote up the order to, and had to send out another letter about because you were being stupid? Please, do so we all know you know, but have zero respect for the court. tap, tap, tap...we're waiting.....

    "Susan Harbison I haven't seen the stay order. Does it specifically state that you cannot continue to conduct discovery?"

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hopefully, your hair grows out by then...

    http://tinypic.com/r/30ll4yd/8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hate when I mispost... ^^^

      Delete
  28. Posted elsewhere:
    by Susan Harbison

    I call Ginger THE HOPPER. In my experience, THE HOPPER is one of those people that believes he is so smart that he is invincible. He is certain he can never be identified because he uses "layers of proxies". He is certain that even if he is identified, he has done nothing wrong. He's probably been advised to shut up, but he can't do that. I think being the owner of that blog allows him to believe he is someone of importance. He can't give that up.
    There are other types of forums that would work better for a group that wants to have running conversations (facebook, message boards, even the old mailing lists) but those forums don't allow anyone to monopolize center stage. I think THE HOPPER'S use of a blog indicates he does not want to simply converse with his "friends". With a blog, the spotlight is always on the owner and everyone else is merely the audience, revolving around the star. A blog is a lot of work because the owner has to regularly produce "articles" in order to hold his "audience". People don't do that kind of work unless they are getting something out of it. I think THE HOPPER has an emotional need that is filled by the blog and he is not willing to give that up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I think THE HOPPER has an emotional need that is filled by the blog and he is not willing to give that up."

      That's rich, Sharon V., AKA "Supertroll." IMO, every reader/poster here would say that is *exactly* and *preciously* your situation with this blog!

      Delete
    2. I think you are precious too!

      Delete
    3. And you Susan, have emotional needs that are filled by being here. A place better than your forum of one, where you can get brief moments of interaction with others, even if it is just negative attention. You know no one wants you here, maybe it is the rejection you crave?

      It's as pathetic as ever that you come here because you are lonely and in need.

      Delete
    4. Clearly Susan nailed it. This blog is all about me, and my insatiable need to feel superior. Its also consuming my life, its all I can think about and takes up all my time. I find that I cant stop posting comments in the wee hours of the morning because I can't sleep without checking what people are saying about me on the blog.....oh wait, thats not me, its someone else. Whew.

      Delete
  29. Go back to Bill and resume your position Susan. At least he pretends to want you around. This groveling for attention over here just makes you look even more pitiful than usual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She's just after Petunia's accessories! She's wanted that lowercase c since day one! Then, the PomPoms. She'll goof around and go for the ♛ one day.
      That's gonna get fugly.

      Delete
  30. Susan Harbison I haven't seen the stay order. Does it specifically state that you cannot continue to conduct discovery?
    10 hours ago · Like

    Bill Windsor No, it does not say that!
    8 hours ago · Like

    Susan Harbison Well how about that, lmao? I wonder what criminal charge is pending against you then?
    8 hours ago · Edited · Like

    Bill Windsor The criminal charges are for me being harassed by a friend of his by telephone.


    All proceedings are stayed and on hold, by order of Judge Carroll effective 3/10/14. Isn't discovery a proceeding? I am disgusted by Bill's ongoing efforts to deceive his followers and his game of semantics. Maybe Snoozan should trot her fanny over to the Ellis Co court house to take a look at the order before taking Bill's word for anything and shooting off her mouth.

    Bill's behavior is outrageous. He is ignoring the court he solicited and using discovery as a tool to intimidate and harass people whose names were pulled out of somebody's butt or off a FB page. Mental illness is the only viable explanation for cold calling people with threats, no matter how "politely" the threat was delivered, then claiming HE was harassed by phone. Bill has no legitimate reason or excuse for what he is doing to most of the people he has named in his action. For all the justification he has in choosing his targets for harassment, maybe he should just pull out the phone book so he can call everybody in Texas.

    Mental illness is the only viable explanation for Snoozan's behavior too. She acted so righteously indignant with respect to our discussion that by virtue of Bill's injury claims BGW could be dragged into this mess but she ignores the fact that Bill continues to stalk, harass and invade the lives of people that can never add value to or support his claims. Bill is harassing the father of one of his targets. Assuming the target is older than 18, how is the father accountable? How does Snoozan rationalize that behavior as being acceptable? If the legal actions are a war as Snoozan sees it, how is this beneficial to the effort? Are they winning yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All good points NBTDT. Also, along with the stay, was the special exceptions raised by another party, which effectively Quashed all discovery and production requests until the next hearing. Which is "stayed" so back to the Quash. You are right about Windsor's semantics, and justifications too. It's is intentional on his part to mislead in every area he can, only to be called on it, and then try to justify.

      I also completely agree with you about deposing third parties. He can't even know for certain the party is even right, but will then send deposition requests to friends and family of that person? Shows how desperate he is. But, I think the up shot is, he will more than likely have to financially compensate people for their inconvenience, harassment, legal fees, etc.

      Delete
    2. "...have to financially compensate people for their inconvenience, harassment, legal fees, etc."

      I certainly hope there are repercussions, penalties and punishment for Bill's behavior. All of the people he is harassing are entitled to justice for his violation of their rights.

      Delete
    3. How so very impressive to get your rocks off by harassing and embarrassing people. Like the ten year old playground bully who everyone hates. The high school drama queen that calls everyone a slut because she is one. That guy in Wal-Mart that pours water on the floor and lays down in it so he can cry they made him fall. The bird that shits in its own nest, rolls around in the poo, gets all gross, jumps up and down flapping it's nappy wings hollering omg look at all this poo on me, then screams at everyone when they look at it because it's not nice to stare. Issue is, it chases them around to punish them for staring, slinging as much poo everywhere as it can because its pissed off they didn't give it a bath and stroke its little head and feel sorry for it that it got shit speared on it, poor sweet baby.

      If you're going to sling shit for a living, I'd think it fair to say that you might get a little on you, by your own slinging.

      Delete
  31. Lawless america has been denied trademark/copyright of "lawless america"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good. I guess he couldn't pull off his desperate attempt to make Lawless America a PAC. How many different things has he stated "Lawless America Association" is now?

      Delete
  32. Bills lemming Rosie is hearing cookies in her head by v2k. Another delusional person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not cookies voices lol

      Delete
  33. "Marty Prehn
    4 hours ago
    Good writing by David Webb to show the hatred of the Joey is a little kid group and their leader Megan Van Zelfden"

    "The Rare Reporter: Texas libel plaintiff settles with Google, he vows to pursue 'scumbag' John Does
    David Webb is a veteran journalist who has covered LGBT issues and all other facets of the news for the mainstream and alternative media for more than three decades. A native Texan, he writes for publications nationwide. Sometimes, he likes to write about ordinary stuff, but not often. Home base is…
    therarereporter.blogspot.com"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's always a step ahead...

      Delete
    2. How odd that Marty would post that today considering the comment exchange above between David Webb and myself. It's almost like they're partners even though Webb claims he doesn't even know who Marty is. "I don't know what you're talking about".

      Delete
    3. All at the direct request of one William M Windsor and his relentless requests for sleuthing, innocent people are slandered and harassed. The agenda of the mighty dictator is well established. Thanks Marty! Thanks Webb! Selective memory will not release liability.

      Delete
    4. "Texas libel plaintiff settles with Google"

      What? The only "settlement" was the judge in the case sustained Google's Special Exceptions, but keep riding that unicorn over the rainbow, Marty.

      Delete
    5. I think that is from the article Webb wrote re: the Margetis lawsuit up above which Marty just re posted again. Nothing new.

      Delete
    6. Oh...as Emily Litella would say...Nevermind.

      Delete
  34. Oooh, Marty has three more names for Bill to add to the lawsuit. I know the underlying effects aren't funny, but damn you have to laugh at some of this stuff. What, is he just taking requests now? [Insert spider pig music from The Simpsons] Windsor vs The World, et al.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Do you know the names

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.