Wednesday, March 5, 2014

For Windsor, Its Always Someone Else's Fault



As we continue to look at the mountains of documents filed in the Maid of the Mist case, and appeal, we see a clear pattern of a complete lack of personal responsibility from Bill.  The judges are mean to me, I'm just a pro se litigant, the housing bubble popped and took all my money.  But what really drives Bill over the edge is when a judge uses a word that perfect describes his actions.

114. Judge Duffey even branded me as a “litigious plaintiff” in the order dated July 30, 2009 (attached hereto as Exhibit 2). “Litigious” is identified as “tending to engage in lawsuits.” (Exhibit 3 hereto.) A “litigious plaintiff” is a person who tends to file lawsuits.” Judge Duffey has no basis to say that. He would have no idea what I have and haven’t been involved with in terms of litigation unless he has false information obtained from some extra-judicial source. Other than Maid of the Mist’s totally improper lawsuit against me, the only lawsuits that I have been involved with personally for the last 15+ years were two legal actions involving real estate (one was an eviction in which my wife and I prevailed but never got paid, and the other was a small claims lawsuit by an attorney trying to buy our home that was dismissed because it was improper under the law). A third lawsuit was filed against me in California by a National Park Service employee who claimed his photograph taken by me at a National Park while he was on duty should not have been used on my personal travel web site. My insurance carrier paid the man $1,000 to go away. My 15-year history as what Judge Duffey describes as a “litigious plaintiff” is that my wife and I sued some people who bounced their rent checks on our unsold Ohio residence, stiffed us for $30,000 or so, and refused to vacate. Contrary to Judge Duffey’s presentation in the order dated July 30, 2009, that I am involved in “three cases,” the truth is that I am involved with one issue: Maid of the Mist and their attorneys. Maid sued me wrongfully. I have sued Maid. 115. The “litigious plaintiff” case that Judge Duffey cites in his order is Martin-Trigona v. Shaw, a case in which a litigant had filed over 250 lawsuits and used litigation as a cruel and effective weapon against his enemies, who are more often imagined than real. Trigona has reportedly sued literally hundreds, if not thousands, of attorneys, judges, their spouses, court officials, and other human beings. His lawsuits have been pursued with "persistence, viciousness, and general disregard for decency and logic." He has used legal pleadings to ventilate his contempt and hatred of persons of Jewish heritage and to level accusations which "have often been personal, have often emphasized racial or religious affiliations, and have often involved the members of ... judges' and counsel's families." The purpose, nature and effect of his resort to multiple litigation has been to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible.

Judge Duffy hit the nail on the head, and Bill objected http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx32b5igLwA. He then selectively choose 15 years because more than that would definitely prove the Judge's point. But what is particularly amazing is how Bill has an out of body experience as he characterizes the Trigona case as something far different than what he is doing. Unlike Bill, Trigona filed tons of lawsuits as a cruel weapon against his enemies, many of which are imagined. This monster even included "judges, court officials, their spouses and other human beings in an effort to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible". Right, and we can all see how this Trigona monster differs from what Bill is doing?

99 comments:

  1. Remind me: his first case that we know of was 198_

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of the earliest one's I've found is in Dallas- Jan. 1979
      It's hard to pin point because he moved so much and many courts purge their records.

      Delete
  2. "A third lawsuit was filed against me in California by a National Park Service employee who claimed his photograph taken by me at a National Park while he was on duty should not have been used on my personal travel web site."

    A perfect example of the Ol' Windsor Spin--it wasn't the image that was the problem, it was Windsor's added CAPTION below the image which was defamatory.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well darn it, looks like Bill forgot that Medieval Times sued Alcatraz Media in a complaint filed 3/26/09 - 4 months before Duffey's ruling. And Alcatraz filed a cross complaint.

    http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trademark-lawsuits/california-central-district-court/45420/medieval-times-usa-inc-et-al-v-alcatraz-media-inc-et-al/docket-text/

    http://www.law360.com/cases/4d2ed258ae94c207cc00000b

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.iptrademarkattorney.com/2009/04/trademark-attorney-medieval-times-trademark-infringement-false-advertising.html

      Delete
    2. Sorry, hit the publish button too soon.

      The article linked ^^^ indicates Bill, et al, was practicing Google search engine manipulation way before Lawless America.

      Plaintiffs further complain that Defendants have purchased the Medieval Times® mark as Google keywords and have embedded the same as metatags on Defendants’ websites. The case is Medieval Times USA, Inc. et al. v. Alcatraz Media, Inc. et al., CV 09-2111 MRP (C.D. Cal. 2009).

      Delete
    3. I recall Billy was in a case with Jerry Springer involving copyrights, but I don't recall the details.

      Delete
    4. Remember what Windsor told MOM just before they filed suit, "You'll write me a fat check." Uh Huh...it was Windsor who wound up writing the checks--several of them--and they were very fat. Poor Billy.

      Delete
  4. Duck Soup - I Object!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=td3p2XKHP2M

    ReplyDelete
  5. I missed this little nugget the first time through Bill's Writ of Mandamus:

    153. I wanted to go to the Supreme Court, but I received legal advice that it would be a waste of money because of the bogus fact problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LMAO thanks for that NBTDT :)

      Delete
    2. What "bogus fact" problem? The fact that all his claims are bogus?

      Delete
  6. I believe it's known as Solipsism Syndrome.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think it is hallarious this latest post by the national Liberty Alliance http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Franklin%20Sheriff%20letter%20and%20response.pdf

    looks like something Bill Might do

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh how nice, Darash got his seal stamp. He said would.

      These people are getting scary.

      Delete
  8. Here is a link to another National Liberty Alliance in Montana t http://www.kbzk.com/videoplayer/?video_id=21360&categories=9,10,213,244,245,246,394,400
    Interesting

    ReplyDelete
  9. From Judge Duffey's denial of Bill's motion to recuse Duffey:

    28 U.S .C. § 144 requires a district judge to recuse himself and "proceed no further" when a party files both "a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him
    or in favor of any adverse party" and 2) "a certificate of counsel of record stating that it is made in good faith." 28 U.S.C. § 144. [Footnote 1: In addition, "a party may file only one such affidavit in any case ." 28 U.S.C. § 144.]

    The potential for abuse of a statute requiring nearly automatic recusal is obvious, and each of those two statutory requirements safeguards against the abusive use of motions to recuse under §144 as an improper litigation tactic.

    The only certificate of good faith that Windsor submitted is one that he himself signed. Indeed, Windsor acknowledges that every attorney he contacted or attempted to contact to review his motion to recuse and attest to his good faith was
    "either unwilling . . ., [unable], or . . .unavailable" to do so [36-2 Mot. at ¶ 23].

    Unfortunately for Windsor, failure to include a certificate of good faith signed by
    counsel of record is "fatal" to a § 144 motion filed by a pro se litigant.

    Windsor seeks a waiver of that statutory requirement because he is proceeding pro se. The law in this district and circuit, however, is clear. The requirement that a party file a certificate of good faith signed by counsel of record serves a critical
    function in preventing the tactical abuse of § 144 by litigants. Id. In every federal case that he has litigated pro se, Windsor has filed motions to recuse or disqualify the presiding judge, sometimes as many as three in the same case. [Maid of the Mist I 361, 406 & 470; Maid of the Mist II 17; and 17 & 36]…



    Windsor reasoning:

    306. This affidavit is accompanied by a “certificate of counsel of record.” As I am the only person of record and I am a pro se Plaintiff, the certificate is from me, and it is made in good faith.


    28 USC 144 CERTIFICATE THAT THIS MOTION IS FILED IN GOOD FAITH

    Plaintiff William M. Windsor, pro se, hereby certifies that this motion and the Affidavit of Prejudice are both filed in good faith. All facts are true and correct.
    I realize that this is normally a certificate signed by “counsel of record”, but I am pro se, so I am my own counsel, and I am providing this to meet the requirements.
    I attempted to get an attorney to also provide a certificate. I contacted the attorneys whom I know except those with the firm of Raley & Sandifer as
    we terminated services with them. Each attorney that I was able to reach advised me that they either had a conflict or did not want to risk retribution from a federal judge. I contacted legal Aid, but they only handle poor people. I contacted the ACLU, but they have a six week waiting list. The law reads “counsel of record,” so I ask that my Certificate be all that is required. Respectfully submitted, this 4th day of August 2009.

    And look here, Larry Klayman tried the same thing.

    http://www.jha.com/us/blog/?blogID=1499

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ahahahaha WOW!! The interpretation of laws by a Vexatious Litigant.
      File anything and everything, then get mad when it gets denied. Blame the courts and sue the world.

      Flash to Cartman....(note the green eyes, just like his horrible photo shop job claiming he has green eyes.)
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCFyJIDGztA

      Delete
  10. Um, if Bill is now saying he is editing his movie, then what claim for damages does he have against the "haters" he is suing because they "killed his movie?"

    Bill Windsor changed his cover photo.
    March 4 · Edited.

    LAWLESS AMERICA...THE MOVIE IS BEING EDITED

    The movie that many people do not want to be released...
    I wonder how many other producers and directors have had hundreds of cyberstalkers, dozens of death threats, etc. — in Midlothian, TX.

    Another previous post indicating he is working on the "movie."

    Bill Windsor changed his cover photo.
    March 1 · Edited.
    BILL WINDSOR PROCESSING LAWLESS AMERICA MOVIE FILM

    Some dangling lemming comments:
    Sweet Pea's Mother Adolfsson- Sounds good, cant wait to see it!
    Viv Vuvu- The only reason people don't want this Movie released is because they can't handle the TRUTH! Keep on Keepin on!
    Aliana von Richthofen- Not coming one minute too soon!
    Jaime Mills- You go Bill
    Camille Zohar Carmelit McMillan- Yes it's a good thing about the movie and wow.
    Bob Allen- When is the movie coming out?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. And what about the dozens of death threats? At any rate, it appears Bill was throwing the lemmings a bone. He's been working on the MO case.

      03/05/2014 Response Filed
      Plaintiff files Response to Defendant Allie Overstreet's Motion to Dismiss. (5 pages faxed)
      Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR

      Delete
    2. Right, the standard bone when he gets too many "what are you doing focusing on the haters" comments.

      As for the alleged "death threats" posts he keeps making- It is just like all his other "death threats" posts. One minute it's Obama who put a hit out on him, and the next it's haters. All empty, fabricated by or for Windsor for drama, and passed along by dumb lemmings. I haven't seen any, and the fact that he likes to pretend the movie "Kill Bill" is a direct aim at him, is by far the most reaching one of them all. Knowing the movie- which was about a woman who had been done wrong by a guy who took her kid and everyone who protected the guy. Has absolutely nothing to do with Windsor but that's how he likes to spin things. What the hell is "colorable" about bullshit allegations like that?

      Delete
    3. well if you break out the crayons...

      That he can spin 'Kill Bill' the movie into being about him just shows how truly narcissistic he is. The world revolves around Bill don't cha know.

      While he may not like the title, it's got nothing to do with him. But he grasps at any threads he can. I remember when he claimed there was a government hit taken out on him LOL- how does he even come up with this stuff? And why would anyone believe him?

      Beyond that, he attributes comments made about watching that movie to many people, when it was not made here. It's pathetic that he thinks the whole world is out to get him. All because there are so many people who disagree with him, or just plain don't like him or his tactics of harassing people online and in court.

      See, Bill really believes that everyone should be on his side, and never question his statements, tactics or anything else he utters. I bet he thinks his farts smell like flowers. ;)

      Delete
    4. Oceans,

      All of your points are well taken and I agree with them completely, especially with his self-promoting tactics. On the other hand, he also engages in patently self-defeating and self-handicapping tactics, For instance, he sent Sundance a request for discovery and is trying to embroil them in the Ellis Co. suit, but why? Does he really think Sundance will now accept any production of his--EVER? Talk about pooping in your own mess kit...

      Delete
    5. Bill talks about death threats to bump up his numbers. He said so in all of his early Talkshoe shows. When he started talking about the movie, he compared those numbers to the death threat numbers. So the death threats are nothing more than self promotion too.

      Delete
    6. Yep, self promotion and malicious lies in court filings. Color it with Billshit to get it in the door. That's the only color going on.

      Delete
    7. What can Brown do for you? Well, it can fuel a lot a vexatious litigation, apparently.

      Delete
  11. NO, YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have been re-reading some of Bill's court filings. He should be better at this after all these lawsuits, and filings. They seem to be all over the place now. While I have always found them to be excessive, he has devolved in his focus. I guess that's what happens when you have so many lawsuits running concurrently.

    I do find it ridiculous how he threatens/promises to sue judges who rule against him, and claims anyone who does not agree with his misinterpretation of the law to be corrupt. If he was being objective, he might see how outlandish his filings are. Maybe he really is trying to lose.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If bill knew how to edit a film put it together and have something people wanted to watch he would have an audience. With his lawsuits who wants to watch a propoganda film and be opposed to it then get sued. Not many people. Here is something interesting http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/06/vimeo-10-million-fund/

    ReplyDelete
  14. Then again it's a propoganda film to get people to join a movement to get a million people to raise up against corruption and put on trial politicians find them guilty of treason and give them the death penalty execute them and then take over their positions. It is a controversial subject as Lori scribner wrote on his page.

    ReplyDelete
  15. All you people do is rag on Bill all damn motherfucking day. No wonder his movie sucked with all the bullshit you sling his way.

    I'll see my self out.

    Alps.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Buh bye Alps~waving~
    He'll be delighted to add you to the litigation for that "movie sucked" remarked.

    ℗ ♛

    ReplyDelete
  17. http://www.scribd.com/doc/211146566/University-of-Montana-Death-Threat-Stalker-Sean-Boushie-Continues-his-Rampage-University-of-Montana-and-Montana-Police-continue-to-REFUSE-to-Uphold

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! That is all I can say about that.

      I do have to wonder why Windsor, who is so big on writing his affidavits didn't write one about his ownership of the Lawless America Association. The only thing I can think of as to why he hasn't done so, when he is trying to sue for damages in part- to his association, is that he is hiding something. He hasn't filed an affidavit to prove he is trademarked and when, copyrighted and when, or anything to prove he has any legal rights to Lawless America. How strange.

      Delete
    2. the KS case asked for it, but he is hiding from that case

      Delete
    3. It sure didn't take Bill long to respond to this comment. He must be a mind reader because you know he would never read this blog!

      Delete
    4. First of all, this document doesn't seem to show up in the court filings yet, so that must mean that Windsor gave Crystal Cox this copy to post up for him, since he has admitted he can not mention Boushie's name.

      Secondly, he repeats himself numerous times like he forgot where he was, or he is just trying to pad the numbers to make it appear longer than it is.

      Third, when he makes a statement with his definition or understanding of what Boushie was saying, when reading what Boushie wrote, it does not match at all. Much of it was sarcasm, hyperbole, mockery, of which no one would take seriously. Such as "Boushie admitting to being a Government paid blah blah" when Boushie says "ya right, I am a Gubberment blah blah." which was making fun of Windsors B.S. claims to begin with.

      I can't even continue. This thing is so bogus, clearly Windsor dramatics, trying to make something out of nothing. I still believe that Crystal Cox was behind the majority of the stuff Windsor is trying to pin on Boushie, and the fact IP addresses can be changed makes it very easy for someone like Cox, who has manipulated the WWW and was listed as Windsor's techie person to be behind this crap.

      Delete
    5. 509. On June 27, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Sean Boushie cyberstalked me. He calls my planned visit to Missoula Montana “Piemagedon,” indicating the visit will be the end for me (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armageddon.)

      "Wow! IMO, the inference Billy makes--to assert the term "Piemagedon" is some form of veiled death threat bends Windsor's credulity to the breaking point. The term is clearly a play on words and part of the on-going trope and inside joke regarding Windsor's pie-eating/liking found on the blog. Given the venue (a blog) and the context (a critical opinion of a public figure), a reasonable person would see the term as it is: at most, nothing more than rhetorical hyperbole well within bounds of protected speech.

      Delete
    6. There is definitely some hyperbole in there. I've learned a lot more lately about aps and programs to change IP & caller ID. The problem in finding the truth is that Cox, Bill and Booshie are very good at misleading people. But there was enough of what Booshie posted on FB, this blog and other blogs to support some truth in Bill's accusations, IMO.

      What really confounds me is that Bill used my comments to support his claims about Booshie but he is trying to sue me for conspiracy, being a vicious cyber stalker, a thing, scum and a brain surgeon.

      Delete
  18. The false statement picture is quite amusing. Not only did "Mr.M" record someone on video calling them a sex offender, he himself stated it in posting the video on his timeline. I know the person who said it is, in my opinion, a complete loon. No one checks out these "stories". More than likely most are for lies and revenge...I said most. Some stories I'm sure really happened. Bust as for the false statements, that makes him just as guilty in my eyes for recording it and posting it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "772. On August 15, 2013, Boushie and his wife, Wynette Boushie, failed to appear in response to a court-ordered subpoena to give depositions and produce documents"

    Actually, I Windsor never appeared. I spoke to the court reporter he hired who was upset with Windsor. He said he got lost and could not find the place to her. He then filed sanctions against them both asking for a sum of about $4,000 a piece. While he stated to the court in Missouri that this was for his travel and lodging. Then he says that his entire trip there was for a TV series. What one was it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "asking for a sum of about $4,000 a piece"

      He is never, ever going to understand how he is his own worst enemy.

      Delete
  20. "36. In December 2012, I was told that a television production company was looking for documentary filmmakers to apply to be on a reality series that would have filmmakers competing for “the next great documentary filmmaker.” I applied, and I made it to what I guess was the semifinals. I was asked to prepare and submit a 60-second video, which I did. I subsequently learned that I was not chosen as a finalist, but I was recognized as a documentary filmmaker by making it to the semifinals. [A true and correct copy of the news release announcing the competition, my application, and an email asking me to produce a video for submission are provided on the Flash Drive marked as Exhibit A hereto, Exhibits = 2012-12-05-09-00-00-AM-New-Reality-TV-Show-Launched-to-find-Next-Great- News-Documentary -- Pursuit-of-the-Truth-Application -- 2013-02-01-00-00-00-PM-Email-from-Pursuit-of-the-Truth-Filmmaker-Competition.] My video submission is provided on the Flash Drive marked as Exhibit A hereto, Exhibits = William M. Windsor Video for www.pursuitofthetruth.com Filmmaker Competition.]"

    Let Just say you made it on the show and people thought that the show sucked and your idea sucked and well for the most part told other people you sucked and that your documentary stunk. Then what? There are mega million dollar films that come out and thousands of people dislike them. I don't see them suing everyone who told everyone they know and commented all over that the movie was not good. This film is not even a film it's people's testimonies to congress that never occurred in a real congressional hearing and it is a propaganda film for people to join your movement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wonder if Windsor would make you sign something to even view his film, with your phone number, address, IP address, ISP provider, place of employment, nearest relatives etc. so he could put everyone in his spiffy data base and sue them individually upon any meanie comments.

      Delete
    2. "I subsequently learned that I was not chosen as a finalist, but I was recognized as a documentary filmmaker by making it to the semifinals."

      That sort of reminds me of the story of how Bill came to be recognized as a Grand Jury Consultant.

      Delete

  21. " Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com: john smith - January 14, 2013 at 6:59 PM:
    “From la fb."LAWLESS AMERICA TALKSHOE SHOW TONIGHT AT 10 PM EASTERN TIME: If you are a Nobody or a Lawless America Revolutionary, please tune in. If you are associated in any manner with the American Mothers Political Party, WTP FPR, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, or Govabuse.org, or a hate group of any type, you are not invited, and your presence may be considered cyberstalking."

    If he did not want anyone listening he would not have them all there for everyone to download and listen to. I have a copy of all the Talkshoes, they make great bedtime stories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor doesn't get the whole theory of the internet. He likes the fact that he can manipulate search engines to defame those he doesn't like, talk about his Revolution, Treason, and call everyone under the sun "Corrupt" and "Criminals" but that's it. It is a one way internet highway for Windsor.

      Delete
    2. I usually don't promote crime but in this case, It's too bad those criminals did not steal his entire Jeep contents and all. Maybe we'd be in a difference place now. Then Again If he did not have a Drivers License for instance he would call them Void. Remember he's not Sovereign he's Just Bill.

      Delete


  22. "From January 15, 2012 to April 22, 2013, I produced and hosted approximately 106 episodes on an online radio talk show on TalkShoe.com. These
    programs discussed my work in great detail, had many episodes that were focused on the production of the documentary film, and reported a lot of news. Prior to this, I produced and hosted a number of shows on an online televion show on shovio.com. In 2012, I also produced and hosted online shows on livestream.com. [A true and correct copy of the 106 TalkShoe episodes are attached on Exhibit A hereto, in a folder titled “TalkShoe Shows.]"

    You Produced shows? These were conference calls that discussed GRIP and the Revolutionary Party. Most Recently you talked on them about the plans to execute politicians after they are found guilty of Treason by your grand Jury. Great Work your doing for society, but exception of politicians is called Murder unless your at war with America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! Windsor likes to embellish his stories. Eventually these embellishments will become down and out embarrassments.

      Delete
  23. 145.

    "On January 29, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sean Boushie falsely accused me of being a sovereign I have never been a sovereign. Since this was posted, false reports have been filed with the FBI claiming I am a sovereign. I have never filed a crazy lawsuit, and I have never held a grand jury."

    If it wasn't for you stopping in April on your path for Grand Jurys you would be right there with your own Seal serving papers just like the National Lliberty Alliance. Another group who believe forcing change onto people is the right thing to do. I once heard David Schied say if they can not have Grand Juries he would resort to his second Amendment rights. Well.. I hope he does not make that mistake. Maybe he will gain the fact that you can not have the Grand Juries as he wants. Along with Bill who has this predetermination to Harass those with Political Thought in life that are opposed to him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd have to say that the FBI was watching Windsor long before Boushie allegedly made any comments Windsor must still be shaking in his baby bill booties over that phone call. But for Bill's own plans written out on his Lawless page for treason to all, the fact that Paulson now waits for his sentence, and all the others linked to Lawless (who have been discussed many times here) which Bill states is his, he's leading...they are just following, he probably wouldn't have hit their radar.
      Quack, quack, quack.

      Delete
  24. "I subsequently learned that I was not chosen as a finalist, but I was recognized as a documentary filmmaker by making it to the semifinals."


    No Sir, if Redneck Roy wins the next NASCAR race, it doesn't logically follow that makes him a certified mechanical engineer too. You Billy, were recognized as a semifinalist in a filmmaker contest--that's all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL anyone who applied was a semifinalist, until they became the winner. Bill and his semantics.

      Delete
    2. Of course, we're assuming Windsor actually competed and advanced at least one slot. Given Windsor's veracity, that's a huge assumption, ya know?

      Delete
  25. On the bottom of the whine fest on Bill's facebook page about an alleged Trademark theft, he says this.

    "I don't believe people who would do what they have done should get away with it. In my opinion, anyone who would lie so blatantly cannot be trusted."

    Very good Windsor. Remember you said that when it's proven that you still don't have a Trademark to this date. In fact, remember this for all the lies that you have told that will come back to bit you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually the filing for the Service Mark for the "Lawless America" logo or name is botched. Bill continued to let the USPTO file it as Lawless America Association LLC which is not an entity at all. The filing is false and not correct. It states that it is working as a PAC. Non-Profits can not be PACS nor can they work in the political realm. That is what Bill is working in. Basically I do not see this copyright ever going thru.

      Delete

  26. http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Sean-Boushie/Missoula-Montana/Sean-Boushie-Montana-Death-Threat-Stalker-Sean-Boushie-Criminal-Defamation-Slander-1128902

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see Crystal Cox is pulling all the punches as the mouth piece for Windsor now. It is well documented he conspired with her this whole time, so I guess she feels she doesn't need to hide this fact any more.

      Delete
    2. I guess this falls under the "Lawless" category. Just do underhanded dirty tactics, and then play victim with manufactured "evidence". SMH

      Delete
    3. It's a rip off because it's not a rip off.

      Delete
    4. With all of those emails between Overstreet and Windsor with information it's hard to believe she did not know that lawless America was put into Barbara's name on purpose. I believe Allie Gate has more to hide to whereas she could someone who was involved in some dirty work and she is being still manipulated by Bill, this could mean he is possibly extorting her. Just a hunch

      Delete
    5. No, I was Windsors helper for a time, I explained exactly when he enlisted my help, exactly what I did for him, and exactly how much I was or wasn't paid. Nobody here believed me. The truth is not nearly exciting enough for most readers here. Most have a picture in their head of action films and espionage, and nothing short of wild tales will suffice.

      Delete
    6. Right. Who is it that cares so much about our names? Who was it that thought everyone posting on this blog should be wrapped up in a law suit with Bill? Who was it that dug up Betsi on the internet? Who was it that told Bill that my name is Betsi? Why would Bill launch such a tenacious attack on my screen name and Betsi without anything more than name calling?

      Nobody here will get "a picture in their head of action films and espionage" when Fleming's words "dirty work" are read. Allie's denial would be hilarious if people weren't being hurt by what she, AMPP & Booshie did.

      Delete
    7. You are still acting like an angry blogger monkey, I see. I don't know the answers to your questions above, and I wasn't only referring to Flemings comment. What I do know, is that you are wrong. And THAT would be hilarious if people weren't being hurt by Windsors attacks. To be perfectly honest, (yes, Nothing, I am capable) some of you folks sound a lot like Windsor does. Ramble on dear, I just popped in for a moment. Carry on. No need to stand guard at the clubhouse gate, to jump up and down the second I arrive. Go rest. I am weaning myself from the lemonade (doing very well, thanks for asking) and I invested in my own porch swing, so I won't be back today.

      Delete
    8. You should make a full report for Bill.. http://youtu.be/qd5ay2vXiVs

      Delete
  27. My family and I are victims of a "victim". :(

    ReplyDelete
  28. Here is a sampling of some the pitches for Pursuit Of Truth documentaries. One of the guys is pitching an idea called Plan 241. I think he might be talking about Schaeffer Cox, the injustice of his conviction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/09/12/pursuit-of-the-truth-series-premiere-recap/

      Delete
    2. Looks like this guy won the contest.

      http://gbyoung.com/?p=314

      Delete
    3. Oh, he was talking about Cox. This is the semi-finalist 2 minute video.

      http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/beck-network-reality-show-promotes-d

      Delete
    4. Nope, doesn't appear Bill made it to the semi-finals. There were 6 people chosen out of 20 in quarter finals. Still looking for the list of 20.

      Joshua Ligairi – Plan 241
      Chris Bell – Prescription Thugs
      Dan Quigley – As Much Truth As One Can Bear (The Journey of Mina)
      Maggie Nilsson – Mine: The Lost Padres Legend
      David Rufful – The Dartmouth Review Pleads Innocent
      Kelvin Owens - An American Intervention

      http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/09/26/who-advances-on-pursuit-of-the-truth-check-out-the-recap-for-episode-3/

      Delete
    5. Great work, NB... you mean it's possible Billy was never on POTT? I can't stop laughing!

      Delete
    6. @ 1:16: Thank you. I quit looking for the list of 20 quarter finalists because Bill himself said he didn't make the cut. Looks to me like he missed the contest entry dead line date, which was Jan 31, 2013. The Meet Me in DC event was in Feb '13, right? That appears to be when he filmed his entry video, at the DC event.

      AnonymousFebruary 26, 2013 at 6:30 PM

      LAWLESS AMERICA WILL NOT BE ON A REALITY TV SHOW.

      I was advised today that we didn't make the cut. there was no explanation given, but I can't help but wonder if it is because they read online that I'm a pedophile, a pedophile lover, anti-guy, a racist, a terrorist, a scam artist, a liar, a person who enjoys sex with animals, etc., etc. Perhaps too controversial, or maybe they just didn't like me.

      It's never fun to be rejected for much of anything, but this had everything else on hold, so now I can move again. In the end, I doubt that I would have gone with them because we would have lost all control of the film.

      http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/05/theblaze-tv-teams-up-with-vince-vaughn-and-peter-billingsleys-wild-west-productions-go-go-luckey-for-new-reality-series/

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5U4aBbRTZA

      Delete
  29. How confusing for the lemmings. He specifically told them not to listen, and would banish anyone who didn't follow his orders. Now, he wants to know who has copies? Does this mean if they do, they will be tried for treason? Added to the suit? What to do...what to do...Arrrggg it's a trap!! Don't do it! If you find them, he will think you had the all along, and if you had them all along, you will be considered a "Joey". Run away, run away...LMAO SMH (disclaimer, this comment is considered "mocking". Based on the opinions formed by watching Windsor's actions in the past. Protected by the first amendment. If you can't handle that, well, tough shit. Go change your depends)

    Bill Windsor
    Today · Edited.

    HELP NEEDED WITH BLOGTALK RADIO SHOWS BY JOEYISALITTLEKID.

    I don't have downloads of all the shows, and I need them for court. I have a subpoena request submitted, and the clerk of the court should issue it....but if any of you have downloads, I would appreciate copies.

    Surprise, surprise, the Joeyisalittlekid Blogtalk radio site no longer has any content.
    Thanks, friends. — in Waxahachie, TX.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ROTF - yeah, go change your depends.

      Delete
    2. I truly pity those who missed those radio shows. There was one in particular hosted by ________, ________ and ________ and featured _______ and _______ from _________. Oh Man, I have never laughed so hard!

      Delete
  30. All about the Lawless America Copyright http://youtu.be/qd5ay2vXiVs the latest in the Sockumnetary

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now Sean, you know Windsor doesn't like factual information being comprised and posted, and opinions based on the facts obtained.

      Other than that, I think it's a great piece of information you put together along with your opinions based upon the information you have obtained. Pretty much anybody that isn't a "nobody" would have the same questions, thoughts and opinions as you have, after viewing this information. It looks like a whole bunch lies to me. Lied in each filing, in order to just get something in print, for the appearance of being legit. Is it fraud? Is it perjury? Whatever it is, it isn't honest in my opinion.

      Delete
    2. So does this also mean Barbara committed perjury in her divorce papers along with Bill? Her name is on the LLC stuff, his isn't, yet they both claim she "never had" anything to do with Lawless. So, who committed the fraud? Seems they equally culpable.

      Delete
  31. So Bill has said…“I have a subpoena request submitted, and the clerk of the court should issue it….but if any of you have downloads, I would appreciate copies.” This is for blogtalk radio. I wonder though, if there is a presentment of all of the Talkshoe conference calls where Bill spoke about taking having Grand Juries and then also planing to execute those politicians for the crime of Treason and take their positions then change the laws back. Which audio files would have more of an effect on a Jury?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should we forget the comments here http://youtu.be/rrOkSJPmiCs Bill Sued PATRICK LEAHEY before and now he wants to put him on top of the list for treason. The Death Penalty is reserved for this charge. Then they can take over his office. He goes on to say they know who they are and they are not going away. Is that a Threat to a politician? Make your own opinion.

      Delete
    2. Sean, What most folks don't realize is if they're American citizens, they're ABS--"Already Been Sued" by William Windsor. Moreover, he's sued many more congressional members than Leahey---many more, and let's not forget about the FBI, ya...Billy sued them too... Here's a list of defendants in Windsor's 2010 appeal to the DC District Court:

      10-197 - WINDSOR v. EVANS et al

      SIGMUND R. ADAMS, Defendant
      ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, Defendant
      CARL HUGO ANDERSON JR., Defendant
      JULIE E. CARNES, Defendant
      COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTIVES, Defendant
      JOHN CONYERS, Defendant
      DOES 1 TO 1000, Defendant
      JOEL F. DUBINA, Defendant
      WILLIAM S. DUFFEY JR., Defendant
      ORINDA D. EVANS, Defendant
      FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant
      HAWKINS&PARNELL, Defendant
      ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER JR., Defendant
      GREGORY JONES, Defendant
      JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant
      JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, Defendant
      PATRICK J. LEAHY, Defendant
      MAID OF THE MIST CORPORATION, Defendant
      MAID OF THE MIST STEAMBOAT COMPANY LTD., Defendant
      GENTRY SHELNUTT, Defendant
      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, Defendant
      UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant
      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, Defendant
      UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant
      UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Defendant
      SALLY QUILLIAN YATES, Defendant

      http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-dcd-1_10-cv-00197

      Delete
    3. He's sued Marty Prehn's employer?

      Delete
    4. Yes, Spammy, he did, but it was before Marty had sewn his "Special Agent" patch to his jammies.

      Delete
    5. Does that make him a special double agent or a double special agent?

      As long as you get the "special" part in there...

      Delete
    6. I think it depends on which part of his jammies--top or bottom--Marty sowed his patch.

      Delete
    7. I meant "sewed" not "sowed."

      Delete
    8. Speaking of Special, did anyone else get their "Special Package" from Billy?

      http://i59.tinypic.com/359mli0.jpg

      Delete
    9. He's wasting his money. Or would that be donation money?

      Delete
    10. Oh, yes indeed! Complete w/$19.95 for shipping & including 3 discs & a flash drive! We're giggling this rainy & dreary afternoon away! There have been some humdingers, huge giggles & several snorts,
      Sure, we'll go with movie editing, as he spoon feeds the loyal lemmings.
      God bless those clerks at Kinkos or wherever he's having his Vexi mess mass copied & distributed! Can't you just envision their dismay when they see him pull up? They probably stampede one another to go to break or lunch!

      Delete
  32. Bill tried to get his “Conspockumentary” Propoganda film put on Blaze Network show. I laugh because that is the network that Glenn Beck owns. Then again most of his followers believe in a conspiracies. Anyhow, Here is short informational video http://youtu.be/f3n-LRc0vBo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LMAO @ the sock puppet. It knows more about the difference between making a "criminal complaint" and filing "criminal charges" than the Vexi king, with his frivolous lawsuits full of "evidence" of his self proclaimed "criminal charges." Hahahahaha that was great. Thanks for the laugh!

      Delete
    2. Sean, Don't you believe in conspiracies? Do you think John Wilkes Booth acted on his own?

      Delete
  33. Submitted for your approval...You're now entering...The Windsor Zone...

    Subject: Message for Judge Thrash
    Importance: High
    Judge Thrash:

    Enclosed is a complaint that I have sent to the federal district court judge in Kansas. I have emailed her at least three times with no response. It has been over three months since I originally contacted her. I have now emailed her to advise that I will file this complaint when I am back in Topeka, Kansas on September 12. I am accepting her failure to respond negatively to repeated requests to constitute a grant of leave to file. I cannot wait past September 12. This approval process that you want is not working well. It has taken judges as long as six months to respond. From now on, I will give them two weeks. If they don't respond in that time, I will take that as a grant of leave to file.

    I have had to file police reports, and there can be no requirement for me to get approval before contacting law enforcement. I was recently assaulted twice and shot at once while in Montana. The police told me to seek a protective order, which I did. When my life is at stake, I have no intention of attempting to get anything that I do approved by anyone. One last thing, a legal action has been filed against me by a man in Montana who has threatened to kill me at least 16 times. I am filing a countersuit. There IS no way to get approval for countersuits since they have to be filed so quickly.

    William M. Windsor


    Could someone please refresh my memory? During Piemageddon, 2013, I would like to know the specific number of life-threatening paper wads thrown by the magistrate in and about Mr. Windsor's general vicinity (allegedly) ? Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. This approval process is not working well. The judges need to tell Bill "Denied" a whole lot faster.

      Delete
    2. The problem is that Bill believes the process should work out the way he believes it should. This is how thinks all the time of course. First he emails the judge. Of course we all know they will never answer emails. Then he sends regular mail which reaches the clerk but that is not the process either. They put it into the trash can because asking permission is not like getting a signature from epstiens mom. He just doesn’t get it. I hope he never figures it out. If he was really interested in playing by the rules set up currently and the processes instead of making threats of lawsuits and using force via grand juries to execute them then change laws to make things his way verse using the political process we have now then things would be different for him. Bill seems to threaten anyone who does not make things work out for him the way he wants it. I don’t understand it.

      Delete