Monday, March 3, 2014

Windsor Can't Read During Tax Season



This is going to be a series as we look into Bill's past filings, particularly in Georgia civil action 1:11-CV-01922-TWT and the second amended notice of appeal.  In this filing, we get a pretty good look at all the financial failures, as Bill tells it, that Windsor has been involved in over the past 30 years.  As usual, its everyone else's fault but Bill's that his financial endeavours have been a disaster.   In this filing, Bill tries to claim a negative net worth of almost $1,000,000 while owning two homes worth about $2,000,000 total and having an investment account with Wachovia for over $1,000,000.

Even back in 2011, Bill was playing all kinds of financial games through his wife Barbara as they tried to hide assets from the looming judgement they were about to receive in the Maid of the Mist case.  Bill even shows what kind of game he is playing when he says "there is no law to make a spouse liable to use her separate property to pay for debts of her husband".  The District Court even pointed this out by saying that the Windsor's financial affairs were convoluted.  Then, Bill uses his son Ryan to come up with a $1,000,000 "loan" Bill says he owes to Ryan and Alcatraz for the legal fees in the Maid of the Mist case with a wink and a nod.

Then we have the problem with his taxes.  As we learned in Bill's divorce filing last year, he had not filed a tax return since 2009.  But in this court document we get a little more info on what he did in 09.  Bill says, and I quote:  "The 2009 tax return is inaccurate.  It was submitted when Windsor was unable to read.  It will be amended when time and reading permit.  The 2010 return is on extension due to the same factors."

You see Judge, I suffer from a very rare condition.  Every spring, up till April 15th I can't seem to be able to read.  My doctor diagnosed me with what he called a BS syndrome, but he failed to provide me with medication (rest assured that I am suing him).  So you see, I am simply unable to provide you with current tax returns that could better describe my "convoluted" financial situation.

133 comments:

  1. Dang. And he's driving?

    Wait, Bill proudly displays his resume all over the internet as proof of his success in business. Didn't he say that he decided against going to law school because he was doing well in the business he started while at TTU? But on paper, legally he's broke?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its funny how in public he constantly portrays himself as highly successful "serial entrepreneur". But when we get to the court documents with a looming judgement, its break out the violin for background music as its one sob story after another.

      Delete
    2. I thought he said he was in perfect health?

      Right after he said he never lies...

      Delete
    3. At the beginning of the film project in 2012, he said on his Talkshoe show repeatedly, "there was no money...just an American Express card."

      As for his entrepreneurial ability, consider the MOM case. He tried to enforce a verbal contract--made over the phone--worth millions. What CEO in their right *fricken* mind would do that? Then, he claims he lost because a women's affidavit who overheard the completely enforceable verbal contract, according to Windsor, was not submitted correctly by his attorney.

      Delete
    4. It's those rare green eyes...

      Delete
    5. I think he got those while photoshopping. Always a pleasure to see you here, Spammy.

      Delete
    6. my fav is when MOM told him the deal was off and he knew it was, he went ahead and kept selling tickets knowing they were not going to be accepted just so he could make the ticket buyers mad at MOM as part of his vengeance

      Delete
    7. Rule No. 17 from Billy's Bag of Bad Faith Dirty Tricks:

      Whatever the hand, ALWAYS DOUBLE DOWN.

      Illustration 1. Billy tried the same biz "deal" with Medieval Times but got quickly maced in the face.

      Delete
    8. Rule No. 23: when you are exposed, accuse the accuser of whatever it was you were doing.

      Delete
    9. Rule #47: When all else fails, blame Mike.

      Delete
    10. Rule No. 17, *Always Double Down" Illustration 2:

      Jorensen v. Round America, LLC

      Windsor posted the photograph of Plaintiff on Round America, LLC's internet website.
      The photograph depicts Plaintiff sitting at an information desk in the cell house an Alcatraz
      Island. The posting did not identify Plaintiff by name but included a caption which read, "Cellhouse lnformation Desk - manned by a former inmate at Alcatraz."

      In or around March Z005, Plaintiff wrote to William M. Windsor and demanded that the photograph and caption be removed from the website.

      On August 19, September 9, and October 6, 2005. Plaintiff, through his former-attorney. Jordan Sussman, wrote to William M. Windsor demanding the caption be corrected or retracted. Rather than correct or retract the caption, however, William M. Windsor altered the caption to read, "Cellhouse lnformation Desk" manned by a brain surgeon/nuclear physicist and client of Esquire Sussman."

      On December 21, 2006, Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit in the San Francisco County Superior Court.


      Delete
    11. Lmao @ "blame Mike". Hahahaha.

      Delete
    12. And when Bill's Company, OneJobs was sold to Brassrings in 2000, he was the President, with a teeny tiny percentage, Bain Capital held the rest, it morphed into "I sold my company to the Washington Post (who had a minority stake in the Brassrings).

      Bain Capital sold OneJobs to Brassrings. Period.

      Now it's "I sold the/my business to the Washington Post." Bill uses a kernel of truth, with lot's and lot's of fertilizer.........

      Delete
  2. He can't read? Then what makes him think people have been saying things about him? LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL!! That's why he has so many "sleuths" digging for information for him.

      Delete
  3. https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tools/tax-tips/General-Tax-Tips/Tax-Tips-for-the-Blind/INF23092.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://www.facebook.com/PursuitoftheTruth here is the FB page for the reality tv show that Bill was not picked for, the one he thinks must have been cyber stalked. Really Bill, you just didn't get picked.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Uh oh. Ice in Dallas today. I hope no one falls and cracks their skull. That would be another delay for lawsuits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No...no...In order to use it as an excuse, he would have had to have fallen yesterday--before the ice storm. You forgot about effect--cause in Windsor World.

      Delete
  6. the other question is what will happen with that 501c3 in barbaras name? you know Lawless America Association.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will no doubt be some fascinating *rolls eyes* story about that. Lets see, maybe he had the power of an attorney for her again. LOL
      Maybe he forgot to use the standard B. Windsor to fake out everyone. You know, it's interchangeable to suit whatever the need. Cashing checks for LA, it's Barbara, buying domains under his son's company, it's him. LMAO he is so not bright.

      It's getting near Tax time...
      tick tock, tick tock,
      which Windsor will claim the stock?
      Will it be Babs, or will it be Bill,
      Either way the battle is up hill.
      It's always a tangled web he weaves,
      When it's the IRS Bill likes to deceive.

      Delete
    2. It takes an expert to know this stuff.
      I know someone that refiled my tax returns w.o. my knowledge,my permission without my signature. Claiming no income or negative.
      Then he refiled his own Tax Returns called Ammended Returns. This individual refile ammended returns. Claiming he was Head of Household. Haha. What household was HE head of. LMFAO.
      Claimed both myself and my son Brandon James Figat as HIS exemptions. For IRS purposes. I kinda think he had some help here from his Mother Lillian. Who was an IRS..employee.
      The gall the audacity of this Deadbeat consciencless p.o.s.Who is so cheap, greedy, selfish just a plain Scumbag. Even his own attorney Bill Sweeney called him S.B. when he had left the room.
      Continues to bribe Shirley NY 11967 Postal Employees to give him access to my mail. Tampers with everything incl my Christmas and Birthday cards. Opens up cards rewrites the envelope. Sicko even STEALS gift cards from my cards.
      Files tax returns for people who don't exist. Has fake mortgage interest deductions on his multiple returns. Uses same house two mortgage write offs using 2 differing towns.
      The fraud is endless.
      My sister got sucked into his web of fraud.(she is a Dummy). He filed IRS returns using my sis name from her first marriage that ended in 1967. Filed returns for refund using her and ex hubby. In the 2000s. Her ex.husband scratching his head. Like WTF.

      Delete
    3. what are you psychobabbling about now?

      Delete
    4. So, does this mean you don't believe everyone is Mike or does it mean that YOU are really Mike?

      Delete
    5. It means whatever you percieve its'meaning to be. If the shoe fits!!!

      Delete
    6. The shoe is a lil small. Can I get it in a wide?

      Delete
    7. Worse than Manson? Reeeeeeallly?
      (hint: he left you, he didn't have you massacred)
      *facepalm*

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    8. That is an opinion Ms.Snotgas.. Psychologically, emotionally, educationally, spiritually, monetarily. Oh Yes. You could not be more wrong about the massacre. This sick Bastard massacared his own family in all those ways.
      Rampant Mental illness, Personality Disorders,Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, early traumatic brain injury.
      and you Asshole think you are qualified to judge my mental health? I say NOT. On a bad day I am more stable/grounded. Than you are. On your best day.
      Ranting, raging, boldface lying, switches ids on your kids and wife. When the are not aware. What a RAT. That did not require any Genius. Who could not take candy..from a baby? Take advantage of those who should have been able to trust you. Implicitly.
      When you file your taxes. Who has been signing my name to the returns? Jusy wondering.

      Delete
    9. Uh, Nancy, you said your doctors wanted to put you on Depakote, but you knew better. I am sorry, but when you put your shit out there, and you act like you do, comment on everything you see, calling everyone Mike, etc. you are proving your doctor was correct in his diagnosis, and not you.

      At what point do you look in the mirror and see Mike next? You are making a fine example of the Lawless America Revolutionary's. For the last time NO ONE HERE IS YOUR EX!

      Delete
    10. Nancy? You little nugget, when you get eviserated, Manson's victims were eviscerated, disemboweld, and their blood was used to scrawl vulgarities on the walls.
      You? We're obviously married to & reproduced with a POS that has committed some financial atrocities.
      I'm not your POS ex-Mike. I read up on him. Yeah, you're right, he's dogshit. He's not a Manson catagory POS.
      No one else over here is your POS ex Mike either.
      Join the conversation here, add to the dialog, please. Or hit the red X in the upper corner and exit out to the nether regions of the www to continue your search for the ever elusive POS Mike that did you so wrong.
      He brings his sorry ass over her? I'll personally wallop him upside the head for you. Ok?
      Truce?
      Seriously. Chill. Get a Michelob & ptfd. You're wearing the Mike shit real thin. I already decided he's unworthy of you or our time. Zero most likely agrees.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
  7. I have found this video interesting http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6dk0MCOur8

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those anchors are cute, having trouble keeping a straight face.

      Lawless America The Movie won't include some targeted individuals.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xlkLsvzimI

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZ2NAUq0W54

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBmsfECBPuk

      Delete
  8. The whole point is to do your taxes correctly so as to avoid an audit. Windsor's got it reversed and is bragging that his audits have come back clean. He thinks that it establishes innocence rather than raises questions about why he's been audited so much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol @9:53 ummm did you wander out of the insane asylum, you really should go back

      Delete
    2. Obvious that you have become enamoured by those places yourself.
      Must be the MDs that you brought into the U.S.illegally. They owe you something.

      Delete
  9. Bill W. Likes to talk smack on Facebook. I suggest he read this.. http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/02/us/facebook-post-costs-father/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My other question is why do you post that retraction post on your personal Facebook site in Private? I could not see it I heard about it from a lemming. Are you afraid to post it out in the open?

      Delete
    2. Get a life A..hole.

      Delete
  10. Bill Windsor knows that "Let's Pretend". Is a childs' game.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Save your money Bill your damn right I called the FBI. Watch what you said herehttp://youtu.be/QX7fcVe2wy4
    You don't need a freedom of information act. I just told you. I think you forgot that you said to me that it was all 100% true all of it. Are you making yourself a Liar? Executing a Politician for Treason is murder and calling them traitors is announcing they are a enemy in my book. BTW who started that company Lawless America Association with Barbara's name on it. She said that you she had nothing to do with it in your divorce, but her name is on the Bylaws of incorporation. Interesting someone is lying here. My opinion fraudulent corporation in her name to hide assets from Maid of the Mist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill when you show up to film me I will be filming you for my Sockumentary and we can go Live on my YouTube account how is that? We can even stream live at the police station where I charge you for harassment and loitering.

      Delete
    2. Maybe you could show him how to make up fake people. Give them addresses, names, Soc.Sec.#s.Hide the money off shore via Private Banking.

      IRS you still monitoring him?

      Delete
    3. Explain the Birthday thing. He might like that.
      Just wondering why you left the S.S.# s on the public record?

      Delete
    4. Why doesn't he just go to the FBI and ask for his file? If he was reported improperly then why did they not visit those people instead of him and his cohort?

      Delete
    5. Nancy, go ask Bill what he's doing with the SS#'s he sent his sleuths out to find. No one here is getting any personal info on anyone...that would be your good buddy William M Windsor.

      @ Anon 11:22 very good point. The FBI clearly didn't find anything "criminal" by any reporters. This appears to once again be Windsor, spinning the lemmings with his lies. He already told this story before. I guess he wanted more "oh we love you Bill" comments. He must be lonely tonight. No court papers to file, no appeals to type up...He already said his broken head is fine, so it looks like some re-run drama is in order tonight.

      Delete
    6. Everyone here should fill out an Identity theft affidavit and file it with the AG with Bill Windsors name on it along with Liz Radmore and whomever else was helping him. What is he doing hiring Mexican migrant workers to tote his equipment paying them using our SSNs? That's how they do that in Texas.

      Delete
  12. Then there's the post Susan wrote on her blog of 1 last March. She seems to think you only have to file if you owe money. Wrong. She said it was obvious Bill had transferred his assets out of his name a few years ago. (Side note: has anyone noticed in Bill's biography how many times he claimed to "retire"? Try placing his lawsuit list next to that.) Susie Q then says that if Bill lives off the proceeds of his investments, but if the investments are in someone else's name that he has no income. She then shows her ignorance of charity fraud when she claims that he have to report donations to a charity of his supposed expenses exceeds his income. Go back on lawlessamerica.com and Bill claimed the movie would be entirely financed by donations. It's only now that he's claiming it was financed mostly by him. This still doesn't excuse him from not reporting donations or their use and not making these reports public as he is supposed to do with a non-profit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you report all of your Donations obtained from Fanniemae/Freddemac, GEICO.Medicaid and those bogus exemptions, bogus mortgage interest, stolen ins.proceeds, those Life Ins.policies? IRS can't wait to meet you.
      I made sure to file MY returns .JT

      Thank God fot Turbo tax.

      Delete
    2. Richie Schoendorf at A and W Tax service. He has brass ones. Or is just plain wreckless. He is still putting ME on your returns? Idiot. Its been 14 yrs.

      Delete
    3. Divorce Paperwork filed Dec.4th.2001 w.o. my knowledge.. Why did you countinue claiming me. Filed MARRIED? When you knew we were divorced. You signed and filed the papers yourself Dummy.

      Delete
    4. Have to find that judgement of Divorce. Where it states that I can change my name back to Evans. Going to do that.

      Delete
    5. That Dummy Soc.Sec.# that you got for me. Nice try. It almost worked. Except your behavior told me everything.So did public records Petunia Pigg.

      Delete
    6. Nancy, really, stop your crap. No one here is your ex. Go bug people on Bill's page, and call them fakes. You are wasting bandwidth.

      Delete
    7. @11:36 common now My name is Michael Tandino

      Delete
    8. I want to state that my name is Mike Lowery Bro.

      Delete
    9. Hold on I am Mike Wazowski

      Delete
    10. Wait, I'm Mike Tyson.

      Delete
    11. I am Mike Andike. Nice to meet you Mikes.

      Delete
    12. So Kittykat, you don't have a problem with an uninvited person forcing his/her way into your home to rant and yell at you?

      Delete
    13. Yes. I do have a problem with home invasions at my home. But I am sure that I will be very well compensated for it. Federal Question Lawsuit.

      Delete
  13. We forgot to mention in the last post that Sharon Galloway has a thing for cats, especially black cats. She also knows a couple people named James. If Sharon is Susan than it is very strange that she is able to do the things she does. She says that she is 100% disabled and specifically that she suffers from such injuries as: chronic encephalopathy (usually only seen in boxers), seizure disorder, migraine, transient ischemic attack, cardiac arrhythmias, cognitive dysfunction, memory deficits, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, reactive airway disease, intermittent blindness, organic brain syndrome, lupus, and many other ailments. You have to wonder how someone this ill can even function or could this all be to prop herself up on government tax dollars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't like your sneaky underhanded methods.I will make corrections at will. You are a Devil..not an Angel.

      Delete
    2. Inside court she blames multiple toxicity disorder, outside court she blames spiritual and psychic attack. As for sneaky underhanded methods, you can blame Google, but apparently it won't get you too far.

      Delete
    3. Psychics attack?
      Like the Long Island Medium lady? wow

      Delete
    4. I have no idea whether Sharon Galloway is Susan, and I don't care. But the Sharon Galloway working with George McDermott appears to be the same one with a page on a paranormal site. And a spook in her bedroom.

      http://paranormal7.com/profile/SharonGalloway

      http://www.corruptusjudicialsystem.org/md-sharongalloway.pdf

      Delete
    5. Dumbass. Long Island Medium she isva Medium. Noy a Psychic. Mediums communicate with the deceased. Psychics read Tarot Cards, Palms, energy fields and Tea Leaves. Dummy.

      Delete
    6. "Spook in her bedroom"?

      Are you referring to Agent Prehn at Linda's?

      Delete
    7. And? Nancy? I'm Methodist. I don't do that medium, psychic snit. My tea leaves are in a bag that good southern women use to make sweet tea that we serve over ice.
      Just so you know? I don't think you get a good reading of written words, somehow I am having serious doubts that there is ANY possibility tea leaves will bring ANY revelations. Do you read ANYTHING Windsor writes? Ever? Even he wishes you would ptfd about the Mike being everywhere. Now, Gurl, when the opposition is giving you hints to keep you in good with your leader? That's pity.
      Pity ain't cool. No self respecting human wants to be pitied. Get a grip on your paranoid shit. Your rants are killing any minute shred of credibility you once had...Windsor is even sorry to have you, he's just down so far, he keeps you around as a number fluffer! Doubt me? Ask him. When's the last time he even acknowledged you? He chastised you about your snide remarks to his more lucid commenters, but other than that? You're ass out.
      Go on, now. Zip on down the information highway & verify what you've read. VERIFYing is CRUCIAL.
      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    8. Fluffer?

      Oh, please...

      Delete
    9. My memory must be slipping. Or..you are lying..again. Bill never chastised me for sniffing you out in his FB page.
      What with the stupid names and poor diction. Don't you just love to mock those. What do you call them? ? Oh yeah! Dot Heads.

      Delete
    10. Oh Lawd.
      Nancy? You little nugget! I've not commented on Bill's page.
      Focus.
      iDots. I refer to those similar to you as an iDot. Not yet idiot...hence iDot.

      Okie dokie, I pitied you. I was nice. I'm done.
      Giiiiiiiingeeeeeerrrrrrrrrr? Clean up on aisles 9, 10, 14-17 and all the 20s!
      She's gotta go.
      She'll be wanting to touch the ♛ next...the crazy ones always go for the shiny stuff.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
  14. I like both Mike and Ike. Not M.F.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So I gather you must posess a do as I say. Not as I do. Type of posture.
      As there isn't anyone gnawing away at the Gov. assets more than yourself.
      aka A Hypocrit.

      Delete
    2. Nancy! You are absolutely eat up with 'IT'. What in Tarnation have you gotten into? You're spun. You're gonna wear out your little Samsung Tablet & then what?
      I know, Windsor won't acknowledge you or your jumping up & down comments anymore than he does Snoozie's. Y'all are both jockeying for lead lemming position & neither of y'all can dare compare to Aagent DouchPontoon Marty (Bill's not acknowledging him either).
      Nancy, Snoozan, Marty, RevWolfe, MaryD...wow! What a cast of characters! Good thing that movie is back on, huh?

      ps) Nancy has hagged another blogger something fierce: http://zerodinh.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/nancy-dorothy/

      Delete
    3. Hi Nancy, glad you stopped by. I seem to have misplaced your SS#. As I'm sure you know it's tax time again. Could you please send me your # so I can get my return completed. Thanks for your help.

      Delete
    4. Nancy is on time out over there at Zero's place, it's why she is posting up a storm here and on Billy's page, LOL, I bet Bill has her posts blocked so he can't see them. Especially the ones where she harasses other lemmings for grammar or their names. I particularly like the bigoted comments about people with ethnic names. Yeah, you are that special Nancy. Seek help, and get medicated. You are a hot mess.

      Delete
    5. And Nancy doesn't like people of Hispanic descent, Texans, or Muslims. And she definitely still thinks she makes sense, and that everyone everywhere is Mike, or if you really get her attention, you are just a fake post. Maybe we should all post up some handwriting samples so she can be sure who we are. Oh wait,everyone's handwriting is also Mike's.

      Delete
    6. I dig that Zero person. I'll say that Zero was far more patient than I'd have been.

      ℗ ♛

      Delete
    7. Everyone has their MATCH. No I am not referring to a romantis match. I am stating that I am your match. The one who can out do you. Can pick you out in a crowd, a forum, an envelope, a facebook page. It is tactical rather than logical. I just know when you are in the background or rarely the forefront. No apoligizes.I know that you are the one behind the..mask. Cyberstalking me and anyone else that you can't lure away from me. With your fraud..If you can't get someone.who is my ally away from me..under your spell.Then they will be punished, stalked harrassed by your foot soldiers. Think and say anything you please in reply to this. I know what I know. Don't yield to you. Not capable of being brainwashed or mind controlled either. I am strong and you are weak. Can't put me under some magic spell. Like Charles Mansons girls. I think very independant. My motive is not money. What it is you don't know. So no carrot to dangle. How about that?

      Delete
    8. One word for you Nan, DEPAKOTE!
      Seek help. You are seriously spun, and quite frankly scary. If you really believe your ex is behind numerous blogs, Facebook profiles, in your envelopes, I feel bad for anyone who doesn't take you to get help. You seriously need it, and Windsor is a piece of shit in my book for allowing you to ramble on like you do, instead of actually helping you understand you might have issues you need addressed.

      Delete
    9. Nancy, at least we can agree that this is not logical LOL

      And I really don't want to take anyone real in your life away from you. You need all the help you can get, and all the people who care about you. I hope they can get you through this. No one here even knows you, but you can't even manage to figure that out. Find a real life friend, and talk to them. In the long run, human contact with real people will help you.

      And seriously, you are really out there with the Charles Mason thing.

      Delete
    10. Wow.

      She's a force to be reckoned with.

      Heaven help us when Nancy and Marty team up...

      Delete
    11. I agree Ninja, why aren't the people who know this woman helping her? She is living in a very scary world of her own. And Bill allowing her to ramble and attack and spin her crazy conspiracies without even a word of concern for her stability or well being.

      Delete
    12. If Bill really wants a successful movie he should try this.
      LAWLESS AMERICA: The Failing of Our Mental Health Care System
      Featuring Nancy Figat, Mary Deenan, Marty Prehn, and a mental patient near you.
      Brought to you by Pfizer: Makers of fine Anti Pschotic Drugs since 1998

      Delete
    13. Criminal Minds explained the reason those like yourself live within phony profiles.
      That reason is. They can't look at themselves. So they make up phonies.
      Too late to put you on anti siezure meds, Lithium to stablize those awful rage attacks, an anti psychotic. To stop your delusions and projections of your bad acts upon others.
      I know I know. The Dr.once told me to stop trying to get through to you. Beyond your delusions. That it won't work on you.
      As your issues are untreatable at this time. Too late. Look at the damage you have done.
      Dr. Said that you really DO. Believe your own lies. Can't fight that.

      Delete
    14. I am coming out. I am Mike. I am sorry Nancy. I am sorry for all the grief I have caused. You have found me in this crowded place.

      Delete
    15. I've always loved you, Nancy.

      Delete
    16. How about a movie, true story. About how a smalltown chevy dealership. Hired its first Finance Manager.
      Who at first was adept at covering up his various Phobias, multi personas, Paranoia. So bad was the Paranoia. That when he called his wife from work. He would tell her. "BE careful about what you say. The Boss has this button, he can push. That enables him to listen in to our conversation.".
      The movie can move through some 26 years. How the American Banks nearly failed in 2008. Due to the escalation of this Finance mans bank crimes. Or what he really did all day. In between Test Drives, ture kickers and Credit Criminals. Stay tuned. This is MY MOVIE.

      Delete
    17. Yup. You love me. Just not the way love is meant to be show.
      Zero he too loves me. Jerk! Monster.

      Delete
  15. Oh look, there is another D.C. take over planned for 5/16. And Connecticut may have a war before then. This news passed along via links from Bill's LA page in Maine.

    http://freepatriot.org/2014/01/05/operation-american-spring-call-ten-million-patriots-march-occupy-dc/

    http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/

    http://viralsurvival.com/2014/03/02/as-connecticut-prepares-for-gun-confiscation-one-pro-gun-group-says-they-are-ready-to-shoot-back/

    ReplyDelete
  16. Has Marty Prehn just made a threat to America with that 3/14 statement?! Is that a jihadist statement? Is it pie day? Is it when Bill gets charge because Marty knows something? Is it payday and Marty is getting married? What is the date for?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's when Kroger throws out the unsold paczkis.

      Delete
    2. Think "dumpster diving"...

      Delete
  17. What would the FBI Think about Marty's 3/14 remark on bill facebook page. Looks like a conspiracy to me.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Uh oh...Poor Billy...just got ANTI-SLAPPED.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's just say Billy is most likely regretting his choice of venue for Joeypalooza right now. He's learning the hard way Texas is on the vanguard of both anti-SLAPP and anti-vexatious litigation legislation. Poor Billy.

      Delete
    2. I must have missed something today. I can't find anything that's changed since the last hearing on the 24th.

      Delete
    3. Wait for it...
      It will be epic.

      Delete
    4. An anti-SLAPP motion is no more epic than a regular motion to dismiss.

      Delete
    5. I didn't say the "anti-SLAPP" would be epic now did I?

      Delete
    6. I have no idea what "you" said.

      Delete
    7. Among other advantages, anti-SLAPP usually stays discovery, shifts the burden of proof, and awards non-discretionary legal fees from the plaintiff--not too shabby.

      Delete
    8. Yet more Supertroll, SVG...

      Delete
    9. If I had a dollar for every time someone told Sharon to leave...

      Delete
    10. You're flat wrong, Sharon--both counts. Now go play with your cats

      .

      Delete
    11. *Poof* -- And the Supertroll disappears! Well done Admin!

      Delete
    12. Look at that...defamatory statements by Sharon go *poof* too! ;-)

      Delete
  19. Bill windsor should take notice http://www.aberdeennews.com/news/local/man-accused-of-threatening-judge-gets-prison/article_01fa1d35-de28-5022-9069-6b57c362c21e.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jail for Judges. Gets my vote.

      Delete
    2. Hey Nancy I think your in love with Bill Aren’t you

      Delete
  20. I am assuming that since my email was not answered by Barbara Windsor the Director of Lawless America Association to make a statement that she is not the owner that per the document I have she is the owner. Interesting eh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds about right. That is Windsor's philosophy.

      Delete
  21. I still don't get why if Alcatraz is Ryan's company, Bill got sued and Round America is an interested party. Then Pro Se, Bill filed appeals and motions to reopen the MoM case. This was after Bill signed a negotiated settlement agreement that included a waiver of appeals.

    At any rate, Bill's Writ of Mandamus looks a lot like the other cases he's filed since then. Re: Judge Duffey - Bill is upset because Duffey was "mean" to him and took issue with his 499 page complaint. Duffey called Bill "scurrilous and irresponsible". Bill thinks statutory requirements and rules of procedure should be waived because he is Pro Se.

    I was going to copy/paste some points relevant to pending complaints, particularly with regard to serving subpoenas for depositions. But there are way too many interesting points to choose from.

    These are two of my favorite statements:

    By the court:

    Windor's objectivity is subject to question. In his affidavit in support of his motion to recuse, Windsor wrote that he (1) has an "extreme sense of right and wrong" [36 Aff. at 135], (2) has spent "over 2,000" hours on this case [id. at ¶ 148], and (3) has "no job because [he has] to work full-time on the legal work" [id. at ¶ 181].]

    In Bill's affidavit of Judge Duffey's prejudice:

    176. I know from reading cases that there are some crazy pro se people out there who file bogus stuff galore. I am not one of those people. I can back up everything. Have a hearing, and I will prove it.

    https://word.office.live.com/wv/WordView.aspx?FBsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fattachments%2Fdoc_preview.php%3Fmid%3Dmid.1393885083134%253Ad267f4026f61059941%26id%3De530c360b2b8d1018f9da2d58da9d680%26metadata&access_token=100005125140312%3AAQB2ZawS-ovGGdZR&title=petition%20for%20writ%20-%20mandamus%20-%20appendix%20-%20volume%201%20-%202010-10-15

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill had to learn the hard way that judges can become angered at one party or the other during the course of the proceedings.....thats perfectly allowable and normal actually. Its only if the judge has a bias against someone BEFORE the proceedings start. Court after court, Bill started to get the feeling that all these judges were annoyed and angered by his antics and he figured that was cause to force them to recuse for bias.

      Delete
    2. I think Windsor does this on purpose personally. I believe by reading the voluminous papers he has filed, he always starts out one way, then when what he presents as his evidence doesn't work the way he thought, he starts getting angry, and insulting the court personnel.

      Then he loses all sight of reality and goes for the throat by inundating the courts with more meritless and frivolous crap to purposely build up to the great recusal request. All designed to get away from that particular Judge who saw through him in the first place, in hopes of getting another Judge who he can snow.

      Windsor seems to have a superiority complex. He believes he is always right, and that is where he is wrong. The common denominator in all his hundreds if not thousands of cases and appeals, is him. His anger, hatred, resentments, vindictiveness, maliciousness, etc. blind him. That is the way I see it, the way others who also view his actions see it, and the way Judges seem to also view what he does at the end of the day.

      Delete
    3. And even scarier - Bill encouraged his followers to copy his examples of pleadings and court docs for their own cases. Has he won in any complaints file Pro Se?

      Given Snoozan had a point that it's not about winning/losing, it's a "war". And Bill has stated many times that his mission is to file as many complaints as possible to gather evidence of corruption. In fact, he stated he expects to be ignored and/or lose. But with all the criticism of and lack of support for his pleadings, how does anybody with a legitimate case think following his example is a good idea?

      Delete
    4. Exactly. He also told them they wouldn't accomplish anything in DC either. How could they, when he didn't go about it correctly? He just wanted the signatures on the packages to make up his "evidence" that they are being ignored. They aren't, he just doesn't want to follow procedures. It doesn't support his entire mission to collect manufactured evidence of "corruption".

      My understanding of the entire MOM case boils down to the fact that upon a verbal agreement (which doesn't mean anything because Windsor's credibility comes into play) a meeting of the minds did not take place. Windsor was ordered not to sell any more vouchers. He broke the agreement, and continued selling. He was wrong, and thrust the entire debacle into years of wasted time and money.

      Schied- also broke the law. Point blank, he didn't pull over. He was wrong, but instead of just accepting it, he tried to justify an unjustifiable action. These two examples are simple personally lack of responsibility.

      Delete
    5. yep re: lack of responsibility. I don't have a problem with Duffey's description of Bill as "scurrilous and irresponsible". What better word than scurrilous is there for all of those webs sites set up with the names of sitting judges?

      scur·ril·ous
      ˈadjective: scurrilous

      1. making or spreading scandalous claims about someone with the intention of damaging their reputation. "a scurrilous attack on his integrity"

      synonyms: defamatory, slanderous, libelous, scandalous, insulting, offensive, gross; More

      Delete
    6. Pretty sure Anon @ 12:01 that the Judge who called Windsor that, knows the definition. SMH

      Delete
  22. Per the strictest interpretation of Texas VL statute Sec. 11.1035, this Texas thing should have been over weeks ago after the first person notified the court of his VL status. Per the second strictest, Windsor had 10 days from the day the judge ruled he had to follow the procedure. That's tomorrow. Discuss?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill has not been declared vexatious in TX, so it doesn't appear the TX statute applies. It appears Judge Carroll asked Bill to comply with Judge Thrash's order, which is for Bill to secure permission through Judge Fitzwater to proceed with his complaint.

      My question is, how long does this case remain open pending Judge Fitzwater's review and ruling?

      Delete
    2. Seriously Sharon? You don't believe that Judge Fitzwater could find your good buddy Windsor didn't have a colorable claim, that it is frivolous and meritless and deny leave? Then Judge Carroll has a lawful reason to dismiss? Really? Wow, you are just so hateful towards the fact that you VL types can't manipulate every single aspect of the courts for your "wars".

      Delete
  23. Bill will never get leave to file from the federal judge in time to save this lawsuit. His attempt to get around the thrash order by giving the judge 2 weeks to respond didn't work. The order says he has to be given leave BEFORE he files. In his haste to punish the joeys for being poopie heads, he jumped the gun and now it's going to bite him on the ass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is where I really believe he wanted to get the giant Judicial Boot.
      He also filed the Facebook suit without leave. (as well as the KS case)
      I really believe Windsor wants to lose. That way, he can file yet another ginormous frivolous case- perhaps starting with Thrash, who caused him to lose millions and millions of dollars due to his "Void" and "illegal" order. Perhaps this will be his first case for the selective citizen grand jury he has been planning.

      It didn't make any sense to me why Windsor would acknowledge the one part of Thrash's order, where he would have to post the 50K if he added Judges to a suit, but ignore the other part that he can't file without leave first. He knows what he's doing.

      Delete
    2. I agree, Ninja. The complaints filed in state courts also fit the revised agenda - the former leaders shot too high in attacking the Fed, so the new plan is taking over the states one county at a time.

      It's interesting that the TX, KS and MO complaints are basically the same complaint Bill filed in his motion to recuse Judge Duffey. Everybody said meanie things about him, in his opinion.

      Delete
    3. Oh, very good point NBTDT. State courts, just like he said. Did he already start his paper terrorism plot? Interesting thought. I believe some of the FB complaints are also pretty much the same too. They conspired with the meanie name callers I believe.

      Let see, he has/had 3 appeals in MT, and a new Federal case there, CA, TX, MO, and KS. Now where are the sleepers filing? Those underground LA people that stopped publically posting when he went sideways, but still support him.

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. Sharon, you don't know anything, and your interjections about what and why the court do things is...shall we say...is bias. You are just another one of the LA lemming types who believe they know more than the courts and the Judges. Every time you insert your opinion as fact, you make the perfect point at why LA and all the other SC's, Oathkeepers, or whatever radical groups believe they are more knowledgeable than the Judges, will always be a total failure.

      Delete
    6. Ok Susan, this will be the last time I respond to your snark. If you were even half as smart as you think you are, you wouldn't even bother with this blog. It must be such a sad lonely life you lead. To be completely consumed with a bunch of anonymous peoples thoughts about an idiot you worship, how depressing. You can spout off about how it's fun for you to act the way you do but I just don't buy it. You're obviously alone, rejected, and bitter. Good luck with whatever shallow life you do have because it appears to me it is overrun with hate and bitterness.

      Delete
  24. I have been reading here a lot lately, I really like it, and it has shed huge lights on my dealings with Dorothy and Nancy, thank you so much. And thanks for the kind words in the comments. I wrote a post in my blog about you guys over here :http://zerodinh.wordpress.com/2014/03/21/joeysalittlekid-blog/ hope you don't mind me snipping a few of your comments, if you do, let me know, i'll remove them. Again thanks for the knowledge and the laughs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure go for it. Fist bump from one "Mike" to another

      Delete