So the phrase of the week seems to be citizen grand juries. It seems that Bill and David Schied were both contacted by the FBI and asked about their involvement in the Sovereign Citizen movementand specifically their plans related to citizen grand juries. And with this coming on the heels of Lawless member Paulson being arrested for trying to carry out the stupid stunt, Bills' and David's answers differ quite a bit.
Bill is only playing games and he can change his story in mid sentence without batting an eye. When asked if he was a Sovereign....he adhered to the first rule of being a Sovereign
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2lmFCqbJcI. He then brought in a new phrase to his lexicon by saying he didn't propose citizen grand juries but rather "Special Regulatory Grand Juries" despite the mountains of documents and videos where he did propose citizen grand juries.
Then we have ole David Schied who really is a believer. He isn't playing games and he refuses to lie. This puts him at a great disadvantage in this world of underground anarchists and makes him a liability to the them. David recaps all the details and more in this article:
http://ppjg.me/2014/02/19/why-would-the-fbi-be-calling-on-me-to-ask-if-i-know-anyone-who-is-organizing-independent-common-law-grand-juries/
Incredibly long story slightly shorter....an FBI agent contacted David because of his connections to both the late Trish Kraus and Bill Windsor and that they "were somehow involved in a "domestic terrorist" organization called Lawless America". Will Bill now be adding the FBI to his lawsuits? Well, instead of following SOP, David like a boy scout went right ahead and gave this agent a long lecture about the sad state of our Country, particularity the legal system. Then when asked about the buzz word of the week, citizen grand juries, instead of denying it or making up a new word like Bill, David went full speed ahead.
"In addressing Agent Brand’s concern about independent grand juries springing up in Michigan without the authorization of these very same (corrupt) judges (and their counterparts in the executive branch), I reasoned that I and others across Michigan and the United States have enough evidence to show that We The People have no other means of accessing any other state or federal grand juries for reporting these government crimes. As case-in-point, I referred to my own numerous case demands to both the judicial and executive branches of both state and federal government for access to the real government of “the People,” by way of either petit or grand juries, and as both a civil “plaintiff” and as a bona fide “crime victim.” I also described how I have thereafter been repeatedly denied such access to anyone outside of government (i.e., “the People” of a petit or grand jury) by both the courts and the prosecutors. I pointed out that I have had so many denials of grand juries by the judicial branch that the latest responses to my demands, at both the state and federal levels, have been to threaten me with sanctions if I file such a court action again clarifying and redressing my demand of this all-important recognition that government crimes are being committed…in spades."
So there you have it mr. FBI agent in an unusually open, honest and transparent way. Agent Brand goes on to articulate the whole platform of this blog and why we have been following bill and his appointed number two guy Schied:
"I doubt that Agent Brand was taking notes, though he was likely recording our conversation as he further elaborated upon his characterization of the classic sovereign by his definition. He described the person as one who locates a single code or statute and uses it to justify one’s own exemption from being subjugated to the chain of other written laws. This is the person who propagates wrongful information while relying upon just that one statute and a limited interpretation of the law, even though such an interpretation might be entirely correct. His concern was the disregarding of the greater context of other laws, either leading up to or encompassing the one being referenced by the sovereign; and that they were encouraging others to join in on relying upon such a limited interpretation of the law while breaking other laws. In regard to those who are undermining and circumventing the laws to form their own grand juries, Agent Brand insinuated that some of those involved in this movement appear to be people who might have fought numerous court battles and emerged as “disgruntled litigants” (like Bill Windsor) who simply did not like the results of the judicial rulings against them."
I give a standing ovation to our brave public servant FBI agent Brand in articulating exactly what is going on here. Bill, David and Lawless are not about exposing real government corruption, its about revenge against a system that rendered a ruling they didn't like and they simply refuse to abide by the ruling of the court. Instead, they want to destroy the very fabric of our society. No evidence, no due process, no actual democracy, just pure vigilante justice at its most primitive form.
The rest of the piece is Schied putting on his reading glasses and giving the agent a long....long.......loooong lecture filled with the usual Sovereign Citizen propaganda with the all caps word TREASON littered throughout the dissertation. The main point being that when asked by a man with a badge, David didn't run from the Lawless America dogma, he reiterated it. Bill Windsor, when put in the same spot, ran from his previous initiates. For all his faults, and they are many, Schied sticks to his guns as a true believer in what he espouses. I can at least respect that. Bill is just simply a vindictive baby hell bent on getting back against any and everyone who dared to speak out against his self serving goals.
