Showing posts with label grand jury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grand jury. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Windsor Can't Stop Himself in Montana

Bill can't take no for an answer.  So after losing in MT, then losing his appeal, its time to go to the Montana Supreme Court as he is requesting supervisory control, with control being the one thing that continues to elude him.

Windsor thinks this is deserved because the judges are corrupt, Boushie is a serial liar, and he forgot to alphabetize his table of contents.  But here is what really fries his circuit board:

30. Judge Larson also issued an order placing filing restrictions on
Windsor. The filing restrictions injunction is outrageous. [APPELLANT'S BRIEF
in DA-13-0785, Exhibit#21.] [Exhibit#22,165; Exhibit#24,165.] There has been
no finding of anything that Windsor has filed that was frivolous or improper. No
court in Ravalli County or Missoula County made any such finding, nor could any
honest judge so claim. This issuance of the injunction was done in complete denial
of due process to Windsor. Windsor received no notice or opportunity to be heard.
Windsor does not have $50,000, so the requirement of $50,000 BOND deprives
Windsor of any ability to ever file a lawsuit against this judge and the other corrupt
judges and judicial employees who Windsor intends to sue and intends to seek a
grand jury to bring criminal charges against the corrupt judges, corrupt court
employees, and corrupt law enforcement officials. There was no show cause order
issued to Windsor, and Windsor was not given an opportunity to be heard on this
matter as is required by law. Meaningful access to the courts is a Constitutional
right that has been denied by DC, and this alleged ORDER denies significant
rights. [APPELLANT'S BRIEF in DA-13-0785, Exhibit#21, RECORD.]

Its like we are in a time warp, this could just as easily be Judge Duffy in Georgia and the year is 2012.  Bill's "rats" have been violated because he has to post $50,000 which he most certainly does have but doesn't want to post, so he thinks he no longer has meaningful access to the courts.  Meaningful being the operative word here.  Bill has had more access to the courts than thousands of people put together.  There is nothing meaningful about any of his filings as they are all copy and paste jobs of his previous frivolous filings.

Notice also Bill's terminology....he didn't say before a jury, he said he intends to bring these judges before a grand jury.  He doesn't want to let John Darash and the National Liberty Alliance steal all his fun, he wants to play judge, jury and executioner as well.

Friday, February 21, 2014

First Rule of Fight Club?

So the phrase of the week seems to be citizen grand juries.  It seems that Bill and David Schied were both contacted by the FBI and asked about their involvement in the Sovereign Citizen movementand specifically their plans related to citizen grand juries.  And with this coming on the heels of Lawless member Paulson being arrested for trying to carry out the stupid stunt, Bills' and David's answers differ quite a bit.

Bill is only playing games and he can change his story in mid sentence without batting an eye.  When asked if he was a Sovereign....he adhered to the first rule of being a Sovereign  He then brought in a new phrase to his lexicon by saying he didn't propose citizen grand juries but rather "Special Regulatory Grand Juries" despite the mountains of documents and videos where he did propose citizen grand juries.

Then we have ole David Schied who really is a believer.  He isn't playing games and he refuses to lie.  This puts him at a great disadvantage in this world of underground anarchists and makes him a liability to the them. David recaps all the details and more in this article:

Incredibly long story slightly FBI agent contacted David because of his connections to both the late Trish Kraus and Bill Windsor and that they "were somehow involved in a "domestic terrorist" organization called Lawless America".  Will Bill now be adding the FBI to his lawsuits?  Well, instead of following SOP, David like a boy scout went right ahead and gave this agent a long lecture about the sad state of our Country, particularity the legal system. Then when asked about the buzz word of the week, citizen grand juries, instead of denying it or making up a new word like Bill, David went full speed ahead.

"In addressing Agent Brand’s concern about independent grand juries springing up in Michigan without the authorization of these very same (corrupt) judges (and their counterparts in the executive branch), I reasoned that I and others across Michigan and the United States have enough evidence to show that We The People have no other means of accessing any other state or federal grand juries for reporting these government crimes. As case-in-point, I referred to my own numerous case demands to both the judicial and executive branches of both state and federal government for access to the real government of “the People,” by way of either petit or grand juries, and as both a civil “plaintiff” and as a bona fide “crime victim.” I also described how I have thereafter been repeatedly denied such access to anyone outside of government (i.e., “the People” of a petit or grand jury) by both the courts and the prosecutors. I pointed out that I have had so many denials of grand juries by the judicial branch that the latest responses to my demands, at both the state and federal levels, have been to threaten me with sanctions if I file such a court action again clarifying and redressing my demand of this all-important recognition that government crimes are being committed…in spades."

So there you have it mr. FBI agent in an unusually open, honest and transparent way.  Agent Brand goes on to articulate the whole platform of this blog and why we have been following bill and his appointed number two guy Schied:

"I doubt that Agent Brand was taking notes, though he was likely recording our conversation as he further elaborated upon his characterization of the classic sovereign by his definition. He described the person as one who locates a single code or statute and uses it to justify one’s own exemption from being subjugated to the chain of other written laws. This is the person who propagates wrongful information while relying upon just that one statute and a limited interpretation of the law, even though such an interpretation might be entirely correct. His concern was the disregarding of the greater context of other laws, either leading up to or encompassing the one being referenced by the sovereign; and that they were encouraging others to join in on relying upon such a limited interpretation of the law while breaking other laws. In regard to those who are undermining and circumventing the laws to form their own grand juries, Agent Brand insinuated that some of those involved in this movement appear to be people who might have fought numerous court battles and emerged as “disgruntled litigants” (like Bill Windsor) who simply did not like the results of the judicial rulings against them."

I give a standing ovation to our brave public servant FBI agent Brand in articulating exactly what is going on here.  Bill, David and Lawless are not about exposing real government corruption, its about revenge against a system that rendered a ruling they didn't like and they simply refuse to abide by the ruling of the court. Instead, they want to destroy the very fabric of our society.  No evidence, no due process, no actual democracy, just pure vigilante justice at its most primitive form.

The rest of the piece is Schied putting on his reading glasses and giving the agent a long....long.......loooong lecture filled with the usual Sovereign Citizen propaganda with the all caps word TREASON littered throughout the dissertation.  The main point being that when asked by a man with a badge, David didn't run from the Lawless America dogma, he reiterated it.  Bill Windsor, when put in the same spot, ran from his previous initiates.  For all his faults, and they are many, Schied sticks to his guns as a true believer in what he espouses.  I can at least respect that.  Bill is just simply a vindictive baby hell bent on getting back against any and everyone who dared to speak out against his self serving goals.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Windsor Can't Keep His Eye on the Prize

Remember that Lawless America scam?  The fake movie?  The radio show?  The citizen grand juries?  The Congressional testimonies?  The Constitutional amendments?  The RV?  The non-profit?  The response to the State of the Union?  The Revolutionary Party?  Ahhhh, ain't nobody got time for that.  Bill Windsor has only ever been about one thing, and one thing only, what Bill wants.

Bill went on his website to give everyone an "update" about the death of Lawless America which is the same ole same ole.  Boushie is mean to me, I need a rich person to give me money.  I'm single and I'm lonely.  Allie cheated by getting an attorney.

While Bill has gone stone cold quiet about his now defunct Lawless America scam, he is literally obsessed with his two new stalking sites devoted to Allie and Sean Boushie.  On the site he has about Sean, he continues to post updated threats and talks about his upcoming TV show in Montana devoted just to Sean (have we taken our Country back now?).

Then we have the site.  What better way to show the court the depth of the stalking and harassing Allie has done to you by setting up a site in her name and asking everyone to give you any kind of dirt they can find on her.  Bill continues to claim he is a member of the press, and wants the superpowers associated with it.  He does not recognize Allie's attorney and says he should be stricken from the record in Bill's "expert" opinion.  He continues to vexaite the court with continuous filings and already alludes to suing the court for corruption.

As to the death of Lawless?  Well that's facebook's fault.  He is going to sue them as well.  Sure facebook provided a free service to Bill with all the rights reserved to revoke it for any reason they decide, but don't let that stop Bill from trying to file a lawsuit.  Lawsuits and pie, lawsuits and pie, that is why this monster even gets up in the morning.  

Monday, May 6, 2013

David Schied Has to Remain in the Kiddie Corner

We are just three weeks away from the big grand jury stunt that will set in motion the means to "take their country back", but there was no talkshoe from Bill or even David, no one knows what to do or even if its still on.  They are supposed to be coordinating with their followers in every county of every state as they put the Nation on notice, yet its complete chaos.

While Bill is still popping pain pills in Tennessee and finally discovering (320 something days into it) that he is going to need to paint a visual story not just non-stop personal testimonies for his fake movie, David has been relegated to kicking rocks over in the corner.  David even tried to reach out to Bill on his facebook page with this:  David Schied Call me ASAP.  but until he becomes a "hater" he will continue to get the cold shoulder as he is simply a nobody inside Lawless America.  He will not get the coordination and support he needs from bill to set up this grand jury stunt..but guess who will get the blame for the impending failure?

And, to make matters worse for David, while he is sequestered over in the kiddie corner, it looks like his know the one he "became married to with kids", is ready to speak out and shed some light on this former convict.  His ex posted this on the Lawless page of all places:  Barbara Iserman Schied
what was done to me was wrong!!!!! and I am going to start speaking up now!!!

I guess David and Bill can commiserate together about the pitfalls of marrying a Barbara.  I gotta go make sure I have plenty of popcorn on hand for this one.

Friday, May 3, 2013

The Vexatious Litigant Rides Again

Apparently, District Judge Fernado Gaitan doesn't mind turning his court room into an all out circus freak show.  If Bozo the Clown isn't booked yet, he could call the court in to session, and I hear they are trying to get the Blue Man Group to perform the opening act.  Yes, that's right, a judge whom Bill would like to see executed (along with his peers) for treason, is willing to hear just how vexations Bill Windsor really is.  Bill filed a lawsuit, after being given permission, against Allie, Mark, and John Does 1-1000.

Bill rattles off 220 statements of facts...of course none of which can be independently verified.  Its mostly a redo of the counter claim he tried last month against Allie when she filed for a protective order.  Around 92% of it has nothing to do with Allie or Mark, but I guess that's why he adds John Does 1-???.  Think of this lawsuit as Bill Windsor vs. A Civil Society, because that's really what we are dealing with here.

Among the mis-statements of fact, we have a cameo of Judge Snooty as Bill offers her up as an "expert witness", I can only assume she got that title by wearing her glasses down to the tip of her nose.  Bill says he has never operated a scam, swindled anyone, tricked or cheated anyone out of their possessions, never had a parking ticket (wth?), is not sexually attacked to children, isn't a bigot, paid his taxes, is a grandpa, only been to jail as a visitor, didn't have women sitting on his lap, doesn't get nude with woman especially in a hot tub, didn't have sex with animals, did not solicit or accept any investments to Lawless America, doesn't drink alcohol, only cusses on Wednesdays (I just made that up, but it seems to fit), and is stalked and harassed to no end by these "stalkers".....who also (gulp) put out his personal information such as his home address and date of birth (you know stuff he posts himself).   And much much much.....more.

So you can continue to keep quiet and sit in the corner and work on your karate chopping Schied, Bill has better things to do than play with your imaginary friends all day no, forget all that stuff, he is getting back to his bread and butter of being a vexatious litigant, its better than a sugar rush from too much pie.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Domestic Terrorist Windsor rats out the USA to Al Jazeera, Visits Jefferson's Grave in Missouri

Last night on his talkshoe show, Bill admitted that he has sought out foreign media to cover his complaints about the United States Government including the Al Jazeera network.  Should we convene our own made up citizen grand jury and convict him of treason, punishable by death?  Well, by his own words, he should be, in fact it would be our patriotic obligation to do so, according to his own standards.  His number two, David Schied, agreed with reaching out to the foreign press and called for our Country to revert back to common law.

Bill then said he went to Columbia Missouri to film the "most important" Founding Father Thomas Jefferson at his grave site to see if he is in fact rolling over in his grave.  Bill said that he couldn't hear Jefferson actually rolling over in his grave, but he saw steam coming up from the ground implying that TJ was steaming mad.  One little problem with all of this is that Jefferson was buried at his place in Monticello Virginia.  The Jefferson Institute decided to move his gravestone to Columbia in an effort to preserve it.  Complete incompetence hasn't seemed to stop Bill yet, so I guess this incontinent truth won't deter him either.  But I have to wonder about Schied as he tries to play academic at a local college, is he fine with being directly associated with, and ruled by, someone so completely clueless about even the basics of American history?

Other notes to come out of the meeting is that he got the RV off an elderly gentlemen who I guess could no longer operate it (since Bill can't operate it either I guess we should qualify Bill as elderly as well).  Bill plans to be on the road (in his jeep) for 3 months on this new tour while he films certain places.  He kicks off the vacation by going to Dollywood Thursday.

The big surprise for us haters is that he may get a Federal Judge to allow him to file civil cases on those that he considers stalkers.

They still plan to carry out the citizen grand jury stunt, now in june, but with Bill out on the road it looks to be completely coordinated and run by David.  I'm wondering if paper terrorism will look good on his educator resume?  Schied also claims to be working with a congressman who wants him to help right a new grand jury related law.  He wont say who or what though.

Monday, April 8, 2013

Showdown in the Show Me State

Its ironic that Bill will be in the Show-Me-State today.  After all his wild claims, today he must show the evidence to back up his assertions.  The evidence is never on Bill's side.  He must feel like a 1.2 career gpa student going in to a final just never goes well.  Its all but certain that he will lose his "trial" today in Lexington Missouri.  But what will happen after his loss?

We learned last night that David Shied and several others are going to be with him today in Lexington.  That will mean several domestic terrorist will be in the court room today and, at lest for a while, be under the direct jurisdiction of a judge.  They will discredit the ruling as soon as they exit the building.  They will call the judge unfit to hold his position and void his ruling as such.

This is all an attack, not against Allie, but against our judicial system.  They don't want to reform it, they want to destroy it.  This is precisely why they are terrorist and enemies of all patriotic Americans.  We can all agree that our system isn't perfect and needs to be reformed.  But anarchy and mob rule are the ideas of those that hate this Country and our way of life.  Windsor and Shied want to take every opportunity they can to discredit our judicial system and thumb their noses at its authority.  That is why its critical that we continue to stand up against these enemies of the State and defeat them before they destroy us all.

Monday, April 1, 2013

The Lawless Shipmates Are Getting Restless

They may have been mildly amused at first, but as Bill continues to spend all this time going after his made up haters, some of the followers are growing tired of the never ending tail-chasing Bill is engaged in.  They signed up for a movie, or a cause they thought was about changing the legal system.  Instead, it seems they are followers of an old man who happens to be a drama king.

Now Bill prepares to go back on the road for what he calls filming, but it really looks like an escape from his local problems with Maid of the Mist and a scouting trip to go do research on his "haters".  No more talkshoe lectures, haven't even heard much about the little citizen grand jury stunt and certainly no word on his fake movie.  They are starting to feel that they are hopelessly adrift at sea, and the only movement seems to be from the daily wind direction and nothing more.  You can start to see their frustrations coming out in the comments to Bill:

Sharon Anderson Why Promote adverse Hate Group Sorry delete I have more important Issues to Advocate4Bill

Naomi Gutierrez I agree. Hate groups should be ignored. Giving them attention fuels the fire. I have something more constructive one can do right here: Please Sign

Stephanie Lynn Bill I trust you... So.... Did you threaten to go to her hearing for her daughter? And work with her ex? And publish the address of her children? I know you have never threatened anyone with a gun. You stated a while back you bought one for protection because you were being threatened. But you never threatened anyone.

Rebecca Potter Please folks, understand the dance of the dysfunctional!!!! They always use threats, lies, intimidation and false scandals and false statements to divert the real truth. This is the dance of the psychopath. Psychopaths always unite to distort the individual who unmasks them. This is why so many who are fighting the "Crazy Courts" are targeted by the psychopaths in and out of the system.

Darin Karl I have been reading Lawless America posts the past couple of weeks, trying to follow along. 
I do have one question, Bill. Do you really think its a safe option to confront your haters at their own residences?

Saturday, March 16, 2013

Are the Nobodies of Lawless America “victims” or unwitting “volunteers”?

Part 3 

So, prior to 2010 we have a coalition of activists with issues that range from domestic to government corruption to judiciary corruption to sovereign rights to constitutional interpretation, to avoiding the IRS.    It appears leaders in the activist groups formed a think tank, of sorts.  

Around the time Restore America Plan was formulated, e-mail within the General Congress discusses steps to address common concerns.    The answer appears to be, rally a movement to oust government officials and judiciary by forming grand juries and/or through existing government.    

Clive Boustred:  The only remedy you have is to gather your neighbors together, form Grand Juries and your own courts and take back America one neighborhood at a time. For goodness sake, you are the government! 

All we need is for the masses to get off their asses.  

By the way, why file it in a private court?  You are the government, form your own Common Law court and jury.  You don’t need judges.  Besides all criminal cases must be prosecuted by jury only.
Sam Kennedy:  Those of you who have ALREADY JOINED ASSEMBLIES ARE VERY WELCOME to take the covenant of office for the Guardians of the Free Republics and the De jure Grand Juries. In this way, you can enjoy direct participation in restoring sovereign control 

The power rests with YOU, with all of the collective members of the sovereign People who make a simple collective decision… 

So in essence, YOU are the remedy 

…that the remedy lies within you. It is up to YOU to come together and reclaim your birth right in the presence of the Lord .

WD Duff
it is in all our interests to compell them to perform as designed......  and hold accountable anyone who would ignore that mandate.  that would include any act, statute or code by our agents that tended to block our ability to enforce that mandate. 

John Roland:  The people, acting collectively through constitutional convention or referendum, are indeed sovereign, and they may indeed choose to change the legal system, but they haven't, and you, as an individual or dissident faction, can't do it by yourselves…… I expect economic collapse, after which people might become more receptive to our message, if we organize ourselves to deliver it 

Copied in e-mail from Cynthia from Bastialaw regarding acting as  Private Attorney and forming Grand Juries:   If more people would do it, or combine their resources to do it, would be a more accepted practice and most effective in holding the Bench & Bar Gang, and all others we have given a sacred trust of honoring our Constitution, preserving its integrity, accountable to the Rule of Law with us as the Sovereigns, the Masters, over them, our servants. 

During this time Bill is tied up with his own legal issues.   David Schied is an activist in Michigan, busy with his legal issues, working to set up RSI and using his experience in the movie industry to tape stories of victims of government corruption.   After the failure of the Restore American Plan, all discussion goes quiet.    

Fast forward to February 2011.   Bill starts a blog about his legal filings and government corruption.    Bill tells his audience that he has researched many sites on various related subjects.   He launches a Face Book cause page called “I Support the Constitution and Bill of Rights”.   He needs and challenges 1 million people to join his cause.    

On February 27, 2011, the first conference of the cause is held.   It is announced as non- political, non-religious; all activist and cause groups are invited to join under the Lawless America umbrella with single purpose, address corruption.  Goals include generate 1 million supporters, “take matters into our own hands”,  get all government officials to sign an Honesty Pledge, get 3 minute videos of corruption stories .  David Schied volunteers first to be a State Coordinator.   Bill points out he has one state covered – 49 more to go. 
On March 6, 2011, the second conference was held.   David Schied participated in chat, Jon Roland appears to have been the phone guest.   The discussion was focused on Article V, with relates to citizen presentment to Grand Juries and organization of a mass movement.  The group discussed a march for July 4th , the event is called Meet Me in DC.   

Not much happened in April.   Then on May 3, 2011, David Schied provided Bill with the statute to present criminal charges to Federal Grand Juries.   Bill posted the information, instructions in how to file and said every victim “should do this”.  

 From May through September of 2011, Bill posts a lot of information and discussion on Grand Jury petitions, suing judges, RICO violations, government corruption, judicial corruption, filing criminal charges and death threats.   He pleads in several posts, urging   readers to go public.  Everybody should join the cause and prepare affidavits to present to Grand Juries on all corrupt government officials and judges.   RICO filing information is posted for every State.   

On November 15, 2011 Bill posted a lengthy endorsement of a candidate for DA in Texas from Jon Roland.   Then on December 7 and 11, 2011 Bill announces that he is regrouping, Save Our Constitution Konvention (SOCK) is taking shape.   He will produce videos, there will be a web blitz and links to GRIP and all cause groups.  SOCK will be held January 15, 2012. 

On December 15, 2011 the SOCK agenda is posted.   Special guests include Jon Roland, David Schied, David Grossack, Rev Freddie Pinkney (associate of David Schied), Jeff Lind and Jack Bauer.    Bill posts on January 2, 2012 that John Margetis (of joeyisalittlekid fame) and Carl Swensson have confirmed to their attendance.     In brain storming ideas to motivate and involve more people, the movie is first mentioned.   

  After SOCK is held, Bill posts the steering committee: 

The GRIP Steering Committee

The following people have agreed to be on the Steering Committee for GRIP: David Schied, Will Gallison, Sally Borghese, Wes Hoyt, George McDermott, Dr. Joseph Zernik, Arnie Rosner, David Grossack, Diane Gochin, Denise Loughlin, Eliot Bernstein, Joe Norman, Larry Hohol, Jon Roland, Phil Stimac, Professor Roger Roots, and William M. Windsor.
During February of 2012 Bill announces that the best way to get people involved with the movie to tell really good stories.   Also during the month, he announces his candidacy for US House and Chief Magistrate Judge.  

In early March, Bill announces that his trip may need to be delayed because there aren’t enough victims coming forward.   About mid-month Bill announces that he will draw more victims to be filmed through the promise to film and present proposed legislation in every State capitol and testimony will be provided to every member of states legislation, the US House and Senate.   He asks for those willing to be filmed to help by “identifying other people we should interview”.    
On April 5, 2012 Bill gives a seminar in how to “sneak” evidence into a Grand Jury.  I point this out as the methods Bill suggests got him banned from the court house and nearly got him arrested.    Similar methods of addressing a Grand Jury were written by Jon Roland on July 13, 2002 and can be found on his web site.   Mr. Roland cautions that the suggested methods may result in arrest.    
So, the movie road trip starts in June 2012.   With the help of the cause and activist groups, a data base of over 200,000 names has been compiled and 1,100 victims are scheduled to be filmed.    In August Bill extents the road schedule to accommodate the growing number of victims that want to be in the movie.   
In October 2012 Bill announces the Lawless America Revolution.   He says “we want our country back” and we no longer have our Constitutional rights.   Bill proposes that those that are aware of our loss of rights join forces to educate the masses.   “We simply need to educate our fellow Americans and remove all of the corrupt and dishonest people from office.”
As we watched the drama of the cause group withdrawals and were horrified that some of the stories presented were not factual, we missed the point.  The facts of any given story were never important in the “revolution”.   The individual causes and situations were never important.   This is about numbers, collecting people and creating a movement with a specific agenda.   And how do companies (and sometimes the government) advance ideas and indoctrinate the masses?   They advertise, they market the idea and the product.    How do you get your message out and capture the attention of a large number of people?   You offer them something they want, for free.   In this case:  you volunteer to tell your story of corruption to us, participate in our cause and in return we will present your story as testimony to the government.   

Bill did tell the truth when he said the thought nothing would be accomplished in the DC event.   He said that all along, from the very beginning.   The Nobodies did not hear him; they were focused on the hope and the promise of their testimony being heard by somebody that mattered, somebody that could do something to help them.    

The DC event is over, the government didn’t listen, nothing happened.  The Nobodies are asking “now what?”   Bill is guiding the Nobodies as he gently reveals the agenda through instruction in blog posts and seminars Talkshoe shows and videos.   Now they are expected to be more than just a victim.   Now, the Nobodies are expected to understand legal terms like Writ of Mandamus and statutes like RICO.    They are told how to ambush judges and Grand Juries.   They are told to complete extensive reading assignments and carefully study their state laws.    Bill has told them all, in bold print, to prepare but not to take any action until they receive further instructions from the Lawless America Revolution.    Did they realize they would become active participants in the “revolution” to jam up the courts and oust the government?   Did they sign up for this?   

As the “victims” and the cause groups have withdrawn one by one, who remains?  David Schied is in the number two spot.   Jon Roland is working quietly in the back ground; he
is also running as a Libertarian or a TX US Senate seat.    The Lawless America agenda is now in full view, should anybody care to do their own research.   Bill has linked to Jon Roland’s site. d-audience-for-lawless-america-show-about-filing-criminal-charges-against-corrupt- judges-and-government-officials&catid=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105

Friday, March 15, 2013

Are the Nobodies of Lawless America “victims” or unwitting “volunteers”?

Part 2

Jon Roland is also an associate of David Schied’s, who is the Michigan State Coordinator
for Lawless America, and recently promoted to the number 2 postion inside Lawless acording to Bill. David Schied is a co-found of the Roger Sherman Institute, or
RSI. RSI is an institute of higher learning, which accepts payment for classes in silver.

From the RSI home page:

Our Mission Statement: Sherman Institute is a private association of instructors
who seek to provide a broad, liberal arts curriculum based on the classical
standard, and a theology program centered on scripture. Students can
explore a variety of major and minor study disciplines, and will leave us with a
moral and nationalist perspective, along with an advanced library containing a
wealth of information generally forgotten in modern academia.

Mr. Roland appears to be an instructor for RSI. A link to the Constitution Society and a
biography written by Mr. Schied are included on the curriculum page on RSI’s web site.

Another co-founder of RSI is Aaron Bolinger. According to SPLC, Mr. Bolinger is
currently a legislative director for Restore The Republic, “a conspiracy-minded Patriot
group that wants to eliminate the Federal Reserve and the IRS, end globalization, and
make it illegal to implant microchips in people…..”. Mr. Bolinger was involved with the
Christian Exodus movement. Which is a fundamentalist group that made an effort to take
control of South Carolina. The group had plans to declare SC a sovereign republic and
enforce Christian morality through the power of government.

The SPLC provides interesting background information on other RSI administrators and

The following e-mail from and to Mr. Bolinger support findings of the SPLC and the
potential use of force “if necessary”:

(Please note: e-mails are in original format, they have not been edited or corrected for
spelling errors. And, please bear with me as pieces of the master plan are written in the
notes below.)

From: Jon Roland
To: wdd
Cc: Aaron Bolinger ; GeneralCongress at
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: GCongress> Last hope: Our States.
In the context of litigative action, everything else is "political".
Armed revolution is political, although we should try nonviolent civil
disobedience first.
On 03/14/2010 08:39 PM, wdd wrote:
a political solution is, in my opinion, utter insanity
-- Jon

Constitution Society
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 jon.roland at
wdd wdd at
Sun Mar 14 20:39:43 CDT 2010
• Previous message: GCongress> Last hope: Our States.
• Next message: GCongress> Last hope: Our States.
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In this day and age, for someone to still believe there is a political
solution is, in my opinion, utter insanity. For generations of one
election after the next it has been proven conclusively that this tide
of socialism will not be turned back thru the vote alone.
Further, thinking that the state will save us is laughable. The State
is engaged in more attrosities against the individual people than the
fed is... there is no motivation for the state to give up its unlawful
"general welfare" power that ultimately gives it the power it needs to
revenue farm the people and to steal their persons and estates through
the probate courts and children through the cps attrosities .......
The state is not your savior. you are. when the state intrudes upon
your dominion over your solely owned property, you have a couple of
lawful choices..... you can beg some state or federal court to protect
you.... or you can sue the bad actors in a court of record proceeding
according to the course of the common law, or you can file a complaint
with your local citizens grand jury and ask them to issue a presentment
to the bad guys to cease and desist.... those are your only hope of
remedy.... and the first is even more laughable than the first laugh i
discussed supra.
learn how to construct and maintain your court of record at learn what your nature in this society is at and be a member of and file yoru complaint with the ..... there is where the lawful hands on
solutions are developing.... the more that recognize that fact and
participate, the sooner we all will throw off the unlawful and
unconstituitonal "ordered liberty doctrine" that has defrauded us all
since the origination of the 14th amendment scam.
everyone is selling their own stuff eh? :)
William duff

----- Original Message -----
From: Aaron Bolinger
To: 'wdd' ; GeneralCongress at
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 8:17 PM
Subject: Last hope: Our States.
I've been bombarded by this back-and-forth discussion long enough now
that I would like to offer a suggestion. Can you folks do a conference
call marathon session, work it out, and then report back the net
results of your agreements/disagreements? My e-mail runneth over, and
I don't really see much progress (unless I am missing it in the depth
of the e-mails).
Secondarily -- my opinion only here - I have completely given up on
ANY courts providing positive redress for any grievance - even if only
a boundary dispute with a neighbor. Seriously - and this is the angle
I have decided to adopt: FORGET any courts for redress. Only go when
shackled. Otherwise, focus on EDUCATING STATE LEGISLATORS (or getting
elected ourselves) who have the plenipotentiary power to do all that
needs done; including:
a.. Refusing to allow the enforcement of ANY "Federal Register"
regulations (pretend legislation) via "agencies" with the states'
b.. Denying the fed-gov the ability to enforce any ultra-vires or
extraconstitutional congressional legislation (Real ID, MCA, P.A. etc.)
within their states' boundaries;
c.. Conducting their own legislative committee investigations on
911 (and/or any other situation whereby the principle/agent
relationship between the states and the fed-gov are in question);
d.. And the introduction of the items contained within the Platform
for Liberty (and things we add to it shortly.) to continue the progress
we are making to roll back the "tail wagging the dog" situation we find
ourselves in.
As far as this entire problem is concerned, the states are our LAST
HOPE. They need to begin acting in a number of very specific ways, but
these legislators must FIRST be educated of their authority, and what
those actions must be (refusing any "grants" and downhill from there.).
Far too many of them think their "job" is to go to their Assemblies
with the mission of bringing back as much federal money as possible to
their districts. They honestly (most of'em any way) do not know any
better! All this wisdom here should be spent on the phones with your
local state legislator. Make it a point to call this person ONCE A
WEEK. Teach'em something! Give them this (link above) platform with
the model bill language.
We've managed to get a collection of them introduced in South
Carolina. A press conference on the Gold/Silver bill is coming in
about a week from Rep. Pitts. When that occurs, it is going to be a
media frenzy over gold/silver in SC. Ya'all might want to be flies on
the wall for the events.
Please, nobody should take my comments personally. I enjoy the
intellectual banter - but let's make hay (bill introductions) while the
sun is shining (Assemblies in session). Dig?
Disciple Aaron
Bible translator-theologian
Legislative Director, NVCCA & Restore the Republic
Ok folks -- project for ya...
Buried neatly within the "sovereignty
resolution" just passed in the SC Legislative session, resideth the
following language:
"Be it further resolved that it is the policy of the State of South
Carolina that the Attorney General will challenge the constitutionality
of any provision enacted by the United States Congress that would
violate any of the policies established by this resolution and join
with other states that are like-minded to make such a challenge."
Our ally, Rep. Michael Pitts happens to be on the Ways & Means
Committee. I reminded him that this "enabling" language might now need
some "tea poured on it" in the form of a budget appropriation for the
Attorney General to actually follow through, and SUE, as a state,
against the Feds. I just contacted the Chief of Staff of the SC
Governor's office to see if they think that specific appropriation is
even required or if Gov. Sanford can just work with the Attorney
General and launch the battle under the enabling policy of the
Of course, this is where you hot-doggers on legal subject matter could
help in several ways:
* Help us create the "shopping list" of rights violations that can
be dug out of reams of federal law/regulations;
* Draft/file "Friend of the Court" briefs when the case is brought;
* Helping the AG establish exactly what is wrong with this or that
federal law, and WHY an original-jurisdiction Supreme Court case should
rule in favor of a state seeking redress, reclamation of 9th/10th/2nd
Amendment rights, etc.
LOTS of fertile ground to plow with this one - if there are any good
gardeners around. :-) We are probably going to discuss this on the
call tonight, and if any of you appear on it and mention it, I can
guarantee devoting time to it.
Disciple Aaron
Bible translator-theologian
Legislative Director, NVCCA & Restore the Republic
Dear Friends,
Forget any legislator they are bought out by the banks, just like the
courts. Please, are we all that naive? We have a band of foreigners
making dollars out of nothing, how do we not expect problems? While
the Federal Reserve Bank continues to manufacture money, the world will
be held in slavery. You are stupid if you do not realize this. Even
Hitler had no problem hiring henchmen and Hitler worked for the bankers
as did Prescott Bush who was charged during World War II for Trading
With the Enemy when his Brown Brothers Bank funded Hitler. When one
considers that both Prescott Bush's son and grand son became President
it should dawn on you who is running the Nation and the world - the
bankers for the Vatican, the Rothschild's We are not going to
fix this problem by pleading to the very despots who are hired by the
Neither will you get redress from your State Capital, as they are also
bought out, just as the local deputy who works for the bankers and gets
his paycheck from the same source.
The only remedy you have is to gather your neighbors together, form
Grand Juries and your own courts and take back America one neighborhood
at a time. For goodness sake, you are the government!
Kindest regards,
Clive Boustred, Chairman CopperCards Association clive at

From: Jon Roland
To: wdd
Cc: GeneralCongress at
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: GCongress> common law court non existant?
The people, acting collectively through constitutional convention or
referendum, are indeed sovereign, and they may indeed choose to change
the legal system, but they haven't, and you, as an individual or
dissident faction, can't do it by yourselves, on behalf of all the
others. The legal system we have is the system adopted by the people,
through their elected representatives. That doesn't mean they consent
to everything that officials do, especially if the officials got
elected through fraud, which is essentially what has happened.
If you enter into a property management contract with an agent to
lease your property, and the agent, instead of leasing it for a good
rate, lets his buddies occupy it for free, that is not a problem with
the management contract, the "system" you agreed to. The problem is his
breach of that contract. The contract may be perfect in every detail,
but no contract can prevent someone from breaching it. You need to do
that by picking the right person as the agent.
Your mistake is to think that the problem is somehow the judicial
system, the courts. It is not. The problem is the people we have
allowed to become judges. That is a personnel problem, and needs to be
managed as such.
Of course, we also have the problem that not only are the agents
corrupt or negligent, but so are most of our fellow citizens with whom
we share sovereignty. You can't fix it without their support. If you
don't get that support, then we will all suffer the consequences
together, and aside from civil disobedience and the consequences of
that, we don't really have an alternative.
I expect economic collapse, after which people might become more
receptive to our message, if we organize ourselves to deliver it, and
the opportunity is not seized by some Caesar.
-- Jon

Constitution Society
2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 jon.roland at
The answer is right here:
Common law courts are already in the works. Lawyers become unnecessary
in common law courts as only our language is spoken, or the language of
the area in which the court is established. Lawyers dislike the idea
of common law courts as they have been in control of all branches of
government for a couple hundred years. They keep the public in
confusion with their foreign language. Best thing that could happen
to our society, second only to abolition of debt money and the
banksters, would be eradication of the Roman judicial system and its
Best regards,.
Bob Taft
The Taft Ranch
Upton, Wyoming
(307) 465-2447
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint
the great ones to public office." Aesop
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:55 PM, C <c at> wrote:
> Hi Guys,>
> Just caught this one amongst thousands of emails.
> Did all that.
> -
> - -
> - ..
> So I tried to get everyone else to do it too. Hardly any takers.
Then it > dawned on me that going before the Mafia and telling them
they are not fair, > is well, silly.>
> Really guys, we are dealing with an extraordinary corrupt enterprise.
> Insiders tell us the Fed has sold more than 600 trillion dollars of
dollars off the balance sheet. They own all the government, courts,
military and > your home. Hitler had no problem hiring henchmen and he
worked for them.
> However a couple of years later people are starting to wake up to the
> simple fact that if enough people get off their asses, the fed bank
is done. All we need is for the masses to get off their asses.>
> By the way, why file it in a private court? You are the government,
form your own Common Law court and jury. You don’t need judges.
Besides all criminal cases must be prosecuted by jury only. Read the
> Working on a new court system, although I will have to retire from
public > service shortly, I can afford it, they have taken everything
from me.

> Kindest regards,>
> Clive>

> Clive Boustred, Chairman CopperCards Association clive at 408-889-4351

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Are the Nobodies of Lawless America “victims” or unwitting “volunteers”?


Part 1 
When Bill Windsor first came to our attention, with his trip around America to film victims of government, court and CPS corruption, the ideas appeared original.  We laughed and poked fun as we watch loonies stray from the path and Bill have bi-weekly melt downs,  never once taking the “movie” project or the “revolution” seriously.  But with the posting of Jon Roland’s video to Lawless America’s site, a sense of seriousness emerged and new questions were asked.   Who are these people and how are they connected to Bill and each other?
If you listened to Jon Roland’s video, you will have discovered that Mr. Roland is an expert on the US Constitution, how it was written, the intent and how the intent was changed.   Mr. Roland has constructed a new constitution; his solution to government corruption is to recruit militia for armed resistance and create a mass movement to replace members of the government and judiciary.
Mr. Roland formed the Constitution Society.   Members of Mr. Roland’s society include  Clive Boustred and Sam Kennedy.    Together Mr. Boustred and Mr. Kennedy formed a group called Guardian of the Republic. 
Mr. Boustred is from South Africa.   His complaints with the American government appear to have started with regard to an IT business venture and during his divorce.   It appears that in 2003, after an altercation with his ex-wife’s boyfriend, Mr. Boustred took his children from their mother, who had legal custody.    He was arrested, the boys were returned to their mother and Mr. Boustred was denied visitation rights.  After which, Mr. Boustred alleges the police attempted to murder him and CPS kidnapped his boys.
Mr. Boustred began a business called Copper Cards.   The purpose of the company is coordinate small groups people and teach them the “true” law, how to eliminate government from courts, forming vigilante courts and grand juries and how to win in court.   Mr. Boustred’s catch phrase is “Take our country back”.    Sound familiar? 

Mr. Boustred attempted to use his own methods in a 2010 criminal case brought against him, he was unsuccessful – he went back to jail.   In 2008 he brought criminal charges against a Judge in one of his cases and in 2007 he attempted to sue the State of California for $198,053,410,750.00. /~clive/coppercards/law/docs/CC-CC-indictment-quo-warrantoIrwinH.Josephv4SIMPLE.doc+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjLIUC wKE6_6TXM0MAFjdckR93cdNO30wWFOyZfJXr6eKibERobhpaCztGghjIAC- 1sAmpI9HXd2vu-WXeh2m0CNHqOcO-7uHErIX5YCvgksxTJwUczo8mC- eY1oJbIUnAHrBim&sig=AHIEtbRnMHL0NLMikhl9kWHJ850Aq_vX0Q

Sam Kennedy also sold packages which promised to help identify sovereign citizens and assist them is avoiding criminal charges, property liens and constraints of civil laws.  Mr. Kennedy hosted a radio show in which the Restore America Plan was broadcast.    The plan was not published and the web sites have been taken down.  Wikipedia provides this explanation: 

Restore America Plan: bold achievable strategy for behind-the-scenes peaceful reconstruction of the de jure institutions of government without controversy, violence or civil war." 

The group advocated the end of "tax prosecutions for resisting the transfer of private wealth to foreign banking cartels" and issuing "orders to the military and police powers to enforce the Peoples’ divine rights of birth."[5] The Guardian of the Free Republics stated that they wanted to accomplish their goals "Behind the scenes, lawfully, peacefully, without violence and without risking civil war." A section of their website titled "Rationale" laid out the ideas behind the group’s goal to "restore Biblical law to a devoutly secular population." The group believed its plan could act as a "vehicle for relieving corporate tyranny. In due time, the higher goal of salvaging the souls of mankind can be addressed."[8]

During the week of March 31, 2010, all 50 U.S. state governors received letters from the group, warning them to leave office within three days or be removed.[7] Governor Mike Beebe of Arkansas said, "It basically said, resign, ask for forgiveness and then we'll reinstate you, and if you sign this we'll consider you re-elected."

The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security stated that they did not believe the group was violent. Some investigators believed, however, that the letters could cause others to commit violent acts.[5] John Stadtmiller, who runs Republic Broadcasting Network in Round Rock, Texas, which broadcasts Sam Kennedy's weekly show, said that Kennedy was behind the idea of sending out the letters. The FBI interviewed Kennedy for two hours on April 2, 2010, but did not arrest him. The interview concentrated on two shows Kennedy did about the "Restore America" project, in which Kennedy set a March 31, 2010 deadline as the day to "begin to reclaim the continent."[1]

As of March 2011, the web site for Guardians of the Free Republics had been taken down.

Contrary to Wiki’s statement that the group is thought to be nonviolent, this statement was made by Sam Kennedy as people were recruited and the plan was put into action:

Some of these events will occur DIRECTLY THROUGH PUBLIC ACTORS, and others will occur through military liaison. If you study military history and publications, you probably understand that the military’s duty to obey proper civilian authority is an intrinsic part of their consciousness. The United States Army and Navy Manual of Military Government and Civil Affairs outlines military authority to recover domestic territory from enemy occupation, restore civilian government, retain proper civilian laws, high-ranking political officials from office, supervise civilian courts, protect money, promote banking and release political prisoners. So the military’s offer was not just happenstance. They understand we have been under occupation since 1861, and in a perpetual state of corporate national emergency since 1933 by declaration of every single CEO of the United States Federal Corporation since then, permitting those CEOs the luxury of unbridled powers outside normal constitutional limitations (Senate Report 93- 549). 

The Southern Poverty Law Center has this to say about Sam Kennedy:

Dr. Glenn Richard Unger, 59 Clifton Park, N.Y.
The host of the popular online radio show "Take No Prisoners," who uses the alias of "Dr. Sam Kennedy," Dr. Glenn Unger is one of the more secretive redemption leaders. In addition to using a false name, Unger doesn't keep a marketing website and doesn't allow followers to videotape his speaking engagements. He markets his "Beneficiaries in Commerce" program as a cure-all for everything from tax bills and debt elimination to what he calls "prison extraction." Unger was a founding member of the Guardians of the Free Republics and received some unwelcome publicity earlier this year when the FBI investigated the group for threatening state governors. In a recent coup by fellow sovereign Tim Turner, Unger was pushed out of the Guardians group. Despite his stealth, the IRS found Unger and hit him with a $116,000 federal tax lien last September. Furthermore, at least three of Unger's clients have gone to prison as a result of following his program; in a fourth case, the judge found the defendant mentally unfit to stand trial as a result of the nonsensical documents he filed with the court. 

Friday, March 8, 2013

A Look at The New Number 2 in Lawless America

One of the reason's Allie O had to go was that she wasn't a true believer in this next phase of Lawless America.  She was more about getting her child back than all these made up citizen grand juries.  Almost instantly after her ousting, in comes the new number two, David Schied from Michigan.  David has been studying this type of thing for a long time and is certainly here to advise and hold Billy's hand through this new phase.

We have obtained classified information from David to Bill about the steps they are preparing to take, here it is:  

"Procedural Steps Taken and To Be Taken To Bring Accountability
to Judicial and Other Government Crimes Through Crime Reporting and Grand Jury Investigations
(See more at
I. 217 days of gathering videotaped testimonies of over 1000 persons reporting judicial and other
government crimes (*Captured during the Summer and Fall of 2012)
II. Written notifications to Congress and Senate about felony crimes being committed with proof of
delivery of DVD testimonials to Congress, sent by mail and/or hand-delivered. (*Reference was also
included to 18 U.S.C. §4 which holds that “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a
felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make
known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.")
A. Cover Letter #1 –
B. Cover Letter #2 –
C. Cover Letter #3 –
D. Cover Letter #4 –
E. Open Letter to Congress –
F. Congressional DVD Page –
G. Proposed Legislation to Congress and State Legislatures for Honesty in Government –
H. Video explaining the Proposed Legislation by “Nobodies” of the Revolutionary Party –
I. Bill Windsor’s speech on behalf of the Revolutionary Party in response to President Obama’s “State
of the Union 2013” (includes proposals for correcting the wrongs and taking our country back) –
1) Video –!
2) Transcript of video –
III. Index to the testimonies of persons in all states with references to Federal Statutes violated
A. State by State Analysis of Right of Citizens to present Criminal Charges to a State or County Grand
B. Index to the Types of Corruption Testimonies captured by Bill Windsor for presentation to
Congress and Senate:
IV. Special Grand Juries –
A. On or about May 1, we will file criminal charges with grand juries all across America – state
(multi-county) and county grand juries as well as federal special grand juries.
1) Constituents will be requesting a letter from state and federal legislators to the grand juries
encouraging them to do what the law provides and allow the charges to be presented.
2) We will publicize it all through mainstream and alternative media sources.
3) Since citizens are almost always blocked by prosecuting attorneys and U.S. Attorneys, we will
bring additional criminal charges against those who violate the law in blocking the evidence
from being presented to the grand juries, and we will bring criminal charges against every
member of Congress who fails to report the felonies that we have reported to them.
B. Each county should have grand juries, and citizens should be able to directly present charges of
government misconduct and corruption to a state and federal Grand Jury. 18 U.S.C. § 3332 reads:
It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire
into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed
within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the
court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence.
Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other
person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense,
the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.
1) Every citizen of the United States must be protected in the right to present charges to a federal
grand jury. Currently, the U.S. Attorneys all across America block citizens from their
Constitutional and legal right to do so. U.S. Attorneys do this to protect their wrongful acts and
the corrupt acts of federal judges and others.
2) When U.S. Attorneys or their “assistants” interfere with citizen reports of crimes to the special
grand juries, they are committing numerous felony acts including but not limited to Interference
with Grand Jury proceedings, misprision of felony, and obstruction of justice on the federal
level, in addition to numerous other state crimes.
3) U.S. Attorneys and others who block citizens' access to present their charges to a federal grand
jury shall be guilty of the crime of treason. Therefore, criminal charges will be filed against all
who block access to the federal grand juries. As state and federal legislators have the
constitutional DUTY (via “checks and balances”) act to stop the blatant violation of the law and
the fundamental rights of Americans by the executive and judicial branches, lists of government
violators from these two branches – depending upon their employment at the state or federal
level – will be brought to the legislators of the state and federal governments with the request
that these the legislative branch bring formal charges against these government “actors” and
remove these government “agents” from office.
C. Procedure for reporting crimes of judges and other government official interfering with the
reporting of these crimes to state and federal grand juries:
1) An affidavit of criminal conduct will be lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity (state
and federal) reporting the commission of the alleged crime(s);
2) At the state (Michigan) level, the following statutes will be cited in support of judicial and
prosecutorial (judicial branch and executive branch) enforcement of criminal complaints:
a) MCL 18.351 – [Crime Victim’s Compensation Board (definitions)] which defines a
“Crime”: “(c) Crime’ means an act that is 1 of the following: (i) A crime under the laws of
this state or the United States that causes an injury within this state. (ii) An act committed
in another state that if committed in this state would constitute a crime under the laws of
this state or the United States, that causes an injury within this state or that causes an
injury to a resident of this state within a state that does not have a victim compensation
program eligible for funding from the victims of crime act of 1984, chapter XIV of title II of
the comprehensive crime control act of 1984, Public Law 98-473, 98 Stat. 2170.”
b) MCR Rule 6.101 (Rules of the Court) holding that, “A complaint is described as a written
accusation that a named or described person has committed a specified criminal offense.
The complaint must include the substance of the accusation against the accused and the
name and statutory citation of the offense. (B) (Signature and Oath) The complaint must be
signed and sworn to before a judicial officer or court clerk…..
c) MCL 761.1 and MCL 750.10 which describe an “indictment” as “a formal written
complaint or accusation written under Oath affirming that one or more crimes have been
committed and names the person or persons guilty of the offenses”.
d) MCL 767.3 holding that at the least, The filing of any such complaint SHALL give
probable cause for any judge of law and of record to suspect that such offense or offenses
have been committed…and that such complaint SHALL warrant the judge to direct an
inquiry into the matters relating to such complaint”.
e) MCL 764.1(a) which holds that, A magistrate SHALL issue a warrant upon presentation
of a proper complaint alleging the commission of an offense and a finding of reasonable
cause to believe that the individual or individuals accused in the complaint committed the
f) MCL 764.1(b) which calls for an “arrest without delay
3) At the federal level, the only citation needed with presenting a crime report to the federal
prosecutor (U.S. Attorney) is the one cited above as 18 U.S.C. §3332.
4) If the state or federal prosecutor declines to act upon the affidavit of crime report within 14
days, or declines within 3 days to provide the complainant(s) with proper notice of their crime
victims’ rights (and to subsequently conclude an investigation and prosecute within 120 days
following the lodging of such a complaint) then a separate criminal complaint will be added
against that prosecutor (as well as against the senior prosecutor in the event that the prosecutor
is an “assistant”).
V. Starting this summer, in states where the judicial, executive and legislative branches of government are
noncompliant we will begin conducting sessions of our own citizen grand juries and courts in which we
will put all the criminals on trial for their crimes, and when appropriate, treason. We will publicize
this. The listing of crimes will be as follows (Source comes from
Itemid=105 and
1) Honest Services Fraud -- 18 U.S.C. § 1346 -- Read about Honest Services Fraud
2) RICO (Organized Crime) -- 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968 (See if your state has a state RICO Act. If
so, that may be your most important charge.)
3) Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering -- 18 U.S.C. § 1503 -- Read about Obstruction of
4) Criminal Judicial Misconduct
5) False Statements to State – Your State statute, for example, O.C.G.A. 16-10-20
6) Tampering with Evidence – Your State statute, for example, Georgia: O.C.G.A. 16-10-94
7) 18 U.S.C. § 1341 -- Mail Fraud and 18 U.S.C. 1346 (honest services)
8) 18 U.S.C. § 1001 -- False Swearing – Making False Statements
9) Perjury -- 18 U.S.C. § 1623
10) Perjury -- Your State statute, for examole, Georgia: O.C.G.A. 16-10-70
11) Conspiracy to Defraud United States -- 18 U.S.C. § 371
12) Subornation of Perjury – 18 USC § 1622
13) Subornation of Perjury -- Your State statute, for example, Georgia: O.C.G.A. 16-10-72
14) Subornation of Perjury -- Your State statute, for example, Georgia: O.C.G.A. 16-10-93
15) Witness Tampering – Your State statute, for example, Georgia: O.C.G.A. 16-10-93
16) Misprision of Felony -- 18 U.S.C. 4
17) [NOTE: O.C.G.A. applies to Georgia only. Research these same violations for your state -- Here's
an index to make it easy.]
18) I am not an attorney. I imagine there are other statutes that have been broken.
19) Some Other Possible Statutes:
20) Bribery -- 18 U.S.C. 201-227
21) Conspiracy Against Rights -- 18 U.S. C. 241
22) Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law -- 18 U.S.C. 242
23) Fraud by Wire, Radio, or Television -- 18 U.S.C. 1343 and 1346 (honest services)
24) Attempt and Conspiracy to Commit Fraud -- 18 U.S.C. 1349
25) Theft or Alteration of Record or Process; False Bail -- 18 U.S.C. 1506
26) Obstruction of Court Orders -- 18 U.S.C. 1509
27) Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant -- 18 U.S.C. 1512
28) Gratuity, 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)
29) Extortion (color of law), 18 U.S.C. § 1951
30) Theft of Government Property, 18 U.S.C. § 641
31) Theft by Government Officials, 18 U.S.C. § 654
32) Bribery or Theft in Programs receiving Federal Funds, 18 U.S.C. § 666
33) Money Laundering, 18 U.S.C. §1956
34) Tax Fraud (evasion, failure to file, filing a false return), 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201, 7203, and 7206 (1)).
Notify IRS early so they can join the investigation.
35) Drug Trafficking, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (common in police corruption cases) conflict of interest,
18 U.S.C. §§ 203, 205, 207, 208, and 209 (not commonly used as stand-alone charges)
VI. Anyone who feels their court experience was improper should collaborate with others to do the
following in effort to have their case reviewed by a Grand Jury (as provided from the following
resource webpage (Note: We will work a coordinated effort on this collectively) –
audience-expected-for-talkshoe-on-april-5-2012-&catid=130:grand-juries&Itemid=105 and
Itemid=105) :
A. Prepare letters to each Grand Juror. If there are 23 grand jurors and three alternates, you want
envelopes addresses to Grand Juror #1, #2...#25, and Grand Juror Alternate #1, 2, 3. [Letter to the
Grand Jurors] Prepare labels for each envelope that say "PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL."
I included a page with my photo and a short bio so they would see that I don't appear to be a
B. Prepare a letter to the receptionist. [Receptionist Letter] The important thing to me about this
letter is that it puts the receptionist on notice. She is being told in writing (and I will have a
signature of receipt obtained by the courier) that this is PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
information that she has a legal obligation to have delivered directly to the grand jurors.
C. Prepare a letter to the County District Attorney (or whoever is the entity that is claiming control
over the grand jury). [Letter to Fulton County District Attorney] The important thing to me
about this letter is that I am putting the District Attorney on notice that I believe he is violating the
law by ignoring my complaints of criminal violations. By advising him that I will be asking the
Grand Jury to investigate him and his office, I am hoping that this stops the DA from trying to
interfere. If he blocks my attempts to have him investigated, it's even worse than if he simply
blocks my complaints against the judges.
D. Have a courier service deliver your sealed PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL envelopes and a
loose letter to the receptionist. The courier's instructions are to give the receptionist two envelopes
with letters to the County District Attorney and the Fulton County Employee responsible for the
Grand Jury as well as the cover letter to the receptionist. The courier will ask the receptionist to
read the letter that is addressed to to her/him.
E. Note: (Bill Windsor) did not provide the Receptionist or the District Attorney with a copy of the
letter to the Grand Jurors. (He) did not want them to know what I was sending PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL to the Grand Jurors. The less they know, the better chance they might not try to
F. If you do not receive confirmation that your envelopes have been delivered to each Grand Juror,
mail certified letters return receipt to each of the Grand Jurors. That way, if someone interferes
with the personal and confidential mail, I would ask the U.S. Postal Service to become involved.
G. Go to the Grand Jury area each day they meet. Take a large envelope addressed to the Grand Jury
and have EVIDENCE written on it in giant letters with a dark felt tip marker. Evidence is the key
word, because if government employees block you from delivering evidence to the Grand Jury, it is
absolutely a crime, in my opinion from reading the statutes. If you have a lot of evidence, take a
box similarly marked. Position yourself in a place where everyone entering and leaving will see
you and your EVIDENCE. Get a photo taken of you holding your evidence at the Grand Jury area.
Ask at least one person who sees you to give you their name, address, and phone as a witness that
you were there. If possible, have a witness accompany you. Take a recorder -- a cell phone with a
recording feature is ideal.
H. (Bill Windsor) took a big hand-held sign that said "HELP - Must Speak to Grand Jury - Have
I. You might also take letters to hand to everyone you see. Plead your case and demand to be heard to
any grand juror who will stop for a second.
J. Document everything. Get the names and titles of anyone who speaks with you; ask for their
business cards.
K. If you are threatened with a crime, document. Get witnesses.
L. On each visit, present the receptionist with an envelope addressed to the Grand Jury and marked
EVIDENCE. If the receptionist refuses to take it and deliver it, note the date, time, what was said,
and get witnesses. In my opinion, this is a crime.
M. On each visit, ask any sheriff's deputy (or whatever entity serves as the bailiff for the Grand Jury) to
take your envelope and present it to the Grand Jury. If the bailiff refuses, note the date, time, what
was said, and get witnesses.
N. When you meet with the Grand jury, be prepared.
O. Start by asking for a roll call, and ask for a list of the names of the Grand Jurors.
P. Verify that each Grand Juror has taken the required oath.
Q. Ask if the session is being recorded and can you obtain a copy of the recording. Ask if you can
R. Present each Grand Juror with a binder containing your information.
S. Provide an overview. Then concisely present each charge, explain the elements, and show the
evidence that the elements for the charge have been met. Make good eye contact. You must
establish confidence with the audience; they have to believe you are a sincere, honest person.
T. What If...
U. If your efforts fail, stay at it. (Bill Windsor) went to the Grand Jury area every Friday for almost
two months before (he) got in.
V. If your state has a statute for empanelling a Special Grand Jury, do whatever is needed. In Georgia,
(Bill Windsor went) door-to-door to every elected county official's office until (he got) someone to
sign my petition. If the Grand Jurors do not grant (him) an audience, (he) will do this because the
end result would be the impaneling of a Special Grand Jury solely for the purpose of investigating
my charges. (He) also went to and spoke at the Meeting of the County Commissioners and asked
each of them to sign the required petition.
W. Follow up everything with faxes every few days asking for action and documenting what hasn't
been done. You want a paper trial of violation proof."

Obviously there is a whole lot to mull over here, but two things I want to point out.  First, anyone who stands in their way will be guilty and charged of treason (which of course is Bill's only punishment by death). "

"Starting this summer, in states where the judicial, executive and legislative branches of government are
noncompliant we will begin conducting sessions of our own citizen grand juries and courts in which we
will put all the criminals on trial for their crimes, and when appropriate, treason. We will publicize
This is where they start crossing the line and into coordinated domestic terrorist activities.  Its all fun and games until you actually start to impersonate law enforcement.