Monday, April 22, 2013

So Who is this Naomi Woman?


Why does an atheist join and defend the cause of Bill Windsor, a man that claims he is led by God?    Or, the other side of the story: Naomi Parrish (or is it Naomi Chambers? ….no wait, it might be Naomi Gutierrez or it could be Naomi Parrish Gutierrez?)
By NBTDT


The details of Naomi’s background and her “they done me wrong” story became of particular interest with the posting of the video produced for Lawless America by Bill and Naomi, titled ‘Windsor v. Overstreet: Case No: 13LF-V00289’.      Bill, as we’ve come to expect, twists and omits facts to claim victory for a mission in which he said he “felt God was leading me to do this”.      Naomi clearly takes sides on Bill’s behalf,   stating that she knows Bill Windsor, he does not sound or come across “like a whacko conspiracy theorist” and she absolves him of all responsibility for vetting “victims”.       Naomi states that she does not know Allie, yet she offers a highly evolved opinion of Allie and her case.      So, who is Naomi Parrish Gutierrez?   By what right does she pass judgment on other past or current Lawless America ‘victims’ and the cases? 
Naomi appears to be well traveled, well read, educated and intelligent.    She was married in 2010, has two sons with her husband and a daughter from a previous relationship, for whom she does not have custody.    Naomi writes several blogs on a wide range of topics and owns a soap making business.    She defines herself as a “militant atheist”, an Islamophobe, a linguist, self-sufficient and self-reliant.      In reading her blogs and viewing her You Tube uploads, it appears that Naomi also considers herself to be an independent, critical thinker and superior to the general population in most respects.    She gives a lot of lip service to independence and moderate feminist ideas, but clearly she prefers more traditional female roles.   I would have to agree with Naomi on one point about herself – she is not a perpetual victim.   In fact, except for discussion about her daughter, she does not dwell on or even mention her past.     And, as we have come to expect from most Lawless America devotees, there is a lot more than meets the eye.  
Naomi’s “they done me wrong” story starts in Arlington, VA, in Judge Esther Wiggins’ court room.   Custody of Naomi’s daughter was awarded to the father, a French national working in the US as a chef, when the girl was 15 months old (about 14 years ago).     Naomi joined with other mothers that felt Judge Wiggins’ decisions were unjust, starting a petition to remove Judge Wiggins from the bench.    One of the other mothers is Nancy Hey.   Nancy Hey also provided “testimony” for Lawless America.  
DHS became involved in Nancy’s case when Nancy’s daughter was a few weeks old; the baby was hospitalized for failure to thrive.      Nancy’s “testimony” indicates her daughter was removed from her custody and her rights eventually terminated as the State used the baby’s loss of a few ounces immediately after birth, as is common, as an excuse to give the foster parents an opportunity to adopt a baby.     In fact, Nancy’s baby was under fed.   Despite DHS efforts to assist and teach Nancy parenting skills, it was determined that due to a developmental disability, Nancy is “unable to adequately respond to the needs” of a child.    There were no relatives in a position to care for the baby.   The court’s decision was upheld on appeal. 

Naomi posted a video discussing her opinion of the Hey case.    She ignores evidence presented in the case and the higher court’s opinion.    She calls Judge Wiggins a liar and accuses the Judge of terminating Nancy’s parental rights because a lawyer friend wanted to adopt a baby. 

As regards Naomi’s custody case, Naomi accuses Judge Wiggins of awarding custody to the father out of favoritism.    Allegedly the Judge frequented the father’s restaurant.    Naomi alleges that the father sent the girl to France to live with his family.   Naomi was ordered to pay child support.   It appears that Naomi did not pay as ordered.   She felt she shouldn’t have to because the child was not living with the father for about 5 years.     It’s important to note that after living in Virginia and DC where she lost custody,  Naomi lived in France and Mexico.    It is also important to note that Naomi’s husband is a Mexican national. 
Details of the Judge’s custody decision are unknown.     Other than favoritism, the only reason Naomi offers for the decision is an accusation of abuse for allowing the child to watch ‘Baby Einstein’.     However, it appears possible that the Judge’s decision may have been influenced by Naomi’s life style and occupations at the time.   Naomi appears to have supported herself through adult entertainment and other untraditional methods of making money.    The father appears to have had a more stable and traditional life style.   
I was an egg donor. I feel NOTHING for the children produced from my DNA.

Naomi gives indications in interaction with her sons and correspondence with her daughter that Judge Wiggins may have had other concerns.   In her “testimony” to Bill, she is obviously irritated by her crying infant.     In a video announcing pregnancy with her 2nd son, Naomi indicates that she will put Benadryl in her older son’s bottle to keep him quiet.    On Facebook Naomi posts a photo of her son in his 2012 Halloween custom; he’s dressed as Hannibal Lector, complete with his arms in a straight-jacket, strapped to a back board and a face mask.   The caption reads “I thought this would be a great Halloween costume for my son Damien. Then I realized, it could come in handy all year round.”    In a suit brought against her daughter’s father, Naomi says she sent the girl, now a teenager, from whom she’s estranged, news of her pregnancy, along with an explanation that delivery of the baby may kill her.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nor1MQaZm_Q


With regard to Naomi’s custody case, the father was wrong to deny Naomi visitation and move the child to France.      The father’s decision and whether or not he lied to the Judge does not relieve Naomi of financial responsibility for her daughter.     But, what happened when the child returned to the US to live with her father?   Did Naomi begin to pay support as ordered?   Did she attempt to exercise her visitation rights?    It appears that she did neither.     In the following videos, Naomi provides indication that she paid support, late, only as necessary to keep her passport.     She denies that she has traveled outside of the US but that clearly is not the case.     Although the methods are unacceptable, the father appears to be attempting to collect what is owed him in back support.     Naomi’s excuse for not making a payment is that she does not have a job, she is a stay at home mom with a baby on the way.     If Naomi were a man would those excuses be acceptable?       

The law suit attached above was filed by Naomi against her father’s daughter, she is seeking $1 million in damages for personal injury.     There are several inconsistencies found in the suit: 
·         Naomi claims that harassment over child support issues caused risk to her health and happiness.   She states “Ms. Parrish has lost enjoyment of life for the past 14 years and does not see an end to her grief in the future”.    There is no indication that the pregnancy or delivery by C-section posed an abnormal risk and by all accounts recorded by Naomi, she is very happy with her life. 
·         Naomi claims that she “underwent an extremely difficult surgery” during the birth of her son, in which “a vertical incision” was made in her stomach.     She is describing the C-section, which was standard and uneventful, as recorded by Naomi’s husband:
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oJ5ZU-EwVM
·         Naomi claims emotional distress at the father’s threat to “tell the family court judge she was a prostitute”.   Some might argue the father’s point to be valid. 
·         The father “threatens to give Ms. Parrish’s daughter up for adoption”.     Does he really mean to attempt termination of Naomi’s parental rights?     It appears the father and child support office are accusing Naomi of abandonment. 
·         Naomi claims that child support payments were “extorted” from her from 2000 through 2006, while the child lived in France.      Even if living in France is a viable excuse for not paying as ordered, there is no excuse for not paying per the order after 2006. 

So once again, it appears we have a Lawless America “victim” that appears to be cherry picking facts and evidence in attempts to convince us that she is a victim of judicial corruption, when in fact her life condition is a result of her own poor choices.     We end where we began:  by what right does Naomi pass judgment on Allie or Nancy?      None, she has no soul. 

71 comments:

  1. Wow NBTDT, thank you for digging into this disgusting 'soulless,' waste of skin's history. She says no one has authority over anyone, then why does she think she does? Why does she get to voice her opinions about someone guilt or innocence?

    Between her shifty eye movements, and body language, it's really hard to watch her. So, she has no soul. So, she doesn't care what she does or says to others. She can lie, cheat, steal, or do whatever SHE wants to do, because she has no conscience and doesn't fear the reaper so to speak. No empathy, no remorse, no compassion, no heart. She should do her children a favor and get in the box so everyone can forget about her. She is evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently, others see it the same way we did:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XOps-u-6eg

      Delete
    2. LMAO YEP!! Loved the background music! Her perception of how shallow life is, really explains how shallow SHE is.

      Interesting point made there, when people won't let you respond and just delete you. Who else do we know that does that after a very valid point is made. *Cough Cough Windbag*

      Delete
    3. Pie Man Zombie HunterApril 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM

      she ban me from her page too....

      Delete
    4. Ok....well....that was the least intellectually stimulating discussion on God ever. IMO, neither side proved their point.

      Delete
  2. Great job NBTDT! Very thorough. I'm disgusted by the fact she laughs about spiking her baby's bottle with benadryl. She is so at ease with it, sounds like it's something she does often to her kids. She doesn't sound like she has a nurturing bone in her body and how could she not care at all about the eggs she's donated? Those ARE a piece of her out there. Whether she's an atheist or not, it's her DNA.

    Regarding the last video you posted / she has no soul? It sounds like she made up her mind when she was 7.

    She claims she was raped while dancing naked for a man in her own home. She claims sex wasn't "on the table" at that time or it wasn't discussed but the guy raped her. Then her and her current husband put up a 10 minute video joking about women who are raped? WTF?

    At the risk of offending people, I do not believe women who are hookers, strippers or porn stars can also be nurturing loving morally grounded people that should be raising children. How can a mother be a stripper or escort AND teach her son to respect women?

    I don't believe any young lady decides that's what she wants to do growing up. So maybe Naomi's mother is a nutcase like she states in her video. Maybe she was abused. Something happened in her past that made her the person she is today.

    Naomi is a revolting soulless human being.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ yappy: thank you. What I found interesting about Naomi's egg donor comment is that the article she was responding to wasn't about the egg donor. The article was about the surrogate mother. A woman and a gay man both wanted a baby. The woman thought that there was an agreement to co-parent a child. She secured egg donation, he provided the sperm. After twins were born, the man claimed the mother was a surrogate only, denied there was agreement to co-parent and was awarded custody of the kids. The egg donor was not part of the custody battle or the discussion. So I'm confused about why Naomi volunteered the information about herself.

      Delete
    2. Good point NBTDT. Could it be Naomi was also a surrogate herself and not just an egg donor? Maybe that's how she views 'surrogates's as simple egg donors.

      For someone who's suing her ex for a $1million, she sure seems to be enjoying life with her new hubby. I don't see any evidence of PTSD or trauma in her life and she hasn't bothered to try and see her teenage daughter? Geez

      Ginger, are we allowed to put up a pdf of the current court case we obtained from PACER?

      Delete
    3. .... sorry, pressed published before I was done. Hasn't bothered to try and see her teenage daughter BUT wants a $million payout from the ex? She is so heartless.

      Delete
    4. @ yappy: I attached it but apparently it didn't transfer. I saved it in Nitro, not sure all readers would be able to open it. If you can attach, that would be great.

      Delete
    5. yes, you are allowed, as far as I'm concerned, its just will it show up

      Delete
    6. Ya, she wants the cash, and not the kid. She SUCKS.

      You know, this sits as well with me as Windsor's son's girlfriend, going through the ACLU to sue for major cash, because she couldn't abort the child. IMO the child should have been taken away from her, if she hated it so much to want to abort it. She didn't deserve that child.

      Delete
    7. Naomi is something!
      Thank you for answering our questions about who she was & what gave her the ability to judge Allie...nada, zip...

      & Yaps? I gotta disagree with you on the women that maybe prostitutes or in adult entertainment...It's not something I'd chose, but I do know there are women that do anything to they can to raise their kids...This Naomi ain't one of those.

      I feel bad for her kid...I hope her kid has had a great life without this woman around her.

      Bill Windsor has a magnet up his ass for these kinda individuals....it's a knack.

      Delete
    8. Les Miserables. History has not been kind to single mothers. But Naomi does bring the comparison upon herself. It's a tale of two single mothers who took unconventional paths to pay the bills: one flaunted her sexuality and the other put on a hard hat and steel toed boots in what is often felt is a distinctly masculine field career. At the end of the night, one of them has more self respect and societal respect. Allie can be like Naomi anytime she wants, but Naomi can't undo where she has been and it would be a long rough ladder for her to climb to Allie's level.

      Delete
    9. @ LNM, I think that is the best compliment I have gotten in a long time. Thank you dear friend.

      Delete
    10. At the end of the night, one of them has more self respect and societal respect. Allie can be like Naomi anytime she wants, but Naomi can't undo where she has been and it would be a long rough ladder for her to climb to Allie's level.

      Excellent analogy LNM. We need a LIKE button :)

      @Petunia, I disagree & I believe that's just an excuse. There's many ways to put food on the table.

      Women need to have enough self-respect and not find ways to earn money by taking our clothes off for strangers. It only perpetuates a vicious cycle. These boys who see their mothers, aunts or sisters earn a living like that often grow up to be men who treat women like whores, using and abusing them.

      They learn to disrespect and devalue women because women are disrespecting themselves. Some women get pregnant by these scum soulless men who don't know what it means to be a great father and leader for future generations leaving single moms desperate to find ways to put food on the table.

      Until WOMEN stop all of this and realize just how much power we really have, this will never end. There's no way I will ever agree with enabling the adult industry environment so men young and old can take advantage of women who care so little about themselves or setting a good example for their babies. ALL WOMEN are worth so much more than selling our souls to bottom-feeding sicko's. We have the power to stop it. I know it's the oldest trade since man-kind and it won't go away but I won't ever be a part of enabling any of it.

      Our children live what they learn. We need to lead by example ladies & raise our boys to be healthy strong decent men who learn to treat women right.

      Delete
    11. I am giving a standing O to LMN's analogy.

      (&Yaps, I see your point, too. I just don't know... I never had to be that woman/mom, Thank God)

      Delete
  3. Naomi also gives GOOD atheists a bad bad name. Some people believe atheists lack morals which is simply untrue. I know some very loving and caring atheists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First we had Judge Snooty, and now this thing. It only goes to show only the really bottom of the barrel of society would dare go on video to vouch for Bill's actions against Allie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ginger. I was thinking damn, even if you choose to believe what he spews, what kinda minion would jump for joy ? I believe her when she says she is soul-less.

      Delete
  5. Why does Bill jack people up who are not fit
    to play either God, or a faux Judge, as is
    the situation with Ms N, who may have
    been manipulated by Bill.
    Why is Bill manipulating things with Janet
    Phelan, who is a mouth piece for
    Joe Zerneck, who was fired from USC.
    So many issues are surrounding Bill,
    his adult Industy problems .

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was one of her FB posts. LMAO- yet she makes her videos without proof or evidence of any kind.

    Naomi Gutierrez
    April 17 near Seattle, WA.

    I refuse to listen to any "theories" behind the Boston Terrorist Attack, until there is some actual evidence. I am a skeptic first. I do not speculate or make conjectures about things without proof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw that snit...Bitch might not felt the same if she'd been at Boston Mass General, fighting for her life after her limbs had been blown from her torso...
      As proficient as Naomi is online, she could have easily been watching livestreaming video, as many of us were & seen for herself what the residents of Boston were living!
      Naomi & Judge Snooty are like peas & carrots...

      Delete
    2. Yeah, when I saw that post I thought, why is speculation about Boston any different than supporting Bill and accusing Allie's son without "actual" evidence?

      Delete
    3. Evidence? Bawahaha! She needs evidence? Really? Like the evidence she uses to shout to the world a teenager is a convicted pedophile? The evidence she uses to blog that I'm a professional victim? Pal-leeeeze. That chick is loon.

      Delete
  7. This is interesting. Janice Levinson comments on Naomi's Venture Philosophy B.S. blog. Now knowing that Naomi is completely OFF her rocker, it seems that Janice (again not vetting sources) will use this twisted bloggers site to further her personal vendetta against AMPP.

    Janice Levinson comments about the AMPP attacks and harassment in the comments section, however all of it fails miserably to note the original and continued attacks towards AMPP by JANICE. (I know I saw this before, but didn't link Naomi to it, until she did her Allie hate video.)

    http://venturephilosophy.blogspot.com/2013/01/american-mothers-political-party-is.html

    I found this from the DogBlog with their article now attacking CPPA. That blog in nothing more than a hate blog itself. No facts, just take what they see, spin it, and boom, it's solid. NOT. Lundy Bancroft is now attached in cyber space to that blog, and Bill Windsor. A simple google search (thanks PP's) will show the connection between Bill, Janice, Lundy, Nutcase Naomi and the PMA hate group. (Google Lundy Bancroft Bill Windsor)

    Good job Dogblog/Janice. Years of hard work by Lundy down the drain, forever imprinted in the WWW solely by your doing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yes and we called it long ago. Lundy didn't want to listen that his sidekick would be the undoing of his career. Now that's karma.

      I sat with a victim at a dv shelter last week and saw bancrofts book on the shelf,"Why Does He Do That; Inside the minds of angry, controlling men" I looked at it and laughed hysterically. They always say, "write what you know". I filed it under "G" for garbage and threw it in trash can where it belongs.

      Delete
    2. I didn't understand the connection between CPPA and Lundy, and why Janice/Dogblog would be attacking them in a backass way like they are. I did some digging, but you probably already know the story if you called it long ago. (we already know she's jealous of AMPP and the other groups she's attacking, but what about Lundy)

      Now, even more confusing is WHY Lundy still has Janice in there, when from what I found, CPPA/Connie Valentine was the "Fiscal Sponsor" of PMA in 2009. I don't understand why CPPA is rolling over and allowing Janice free reign to terrorize AMPP and other groups and their members. Connie and Lundy created PMA, so is Janice jealous of that relationship as well, so she needs to attack them in a way they feel then need to only support PMA and not others?

      The only reason I can see that neither one of them has publically denounced Janice, to save face, is if Lundy knows what she is doing, CPPA knows what she is doing, and they are all really working to build a larger group of their own. If that is the case, then they are all just a sick as Windsor taking money and doing nothing.

      http://lundybancroft.blogspot.com/2009/06/introducing-protective-mothers-alliance.html

      Delete
    3. Ninja, Lundy is associated with PMA. From what I gather Janice approached him back in 2007 to create a protective mothers movement. This was before AMPP was solidified and the original AMPP moms were just doing blogs and helping moms one at a time from facebook, email, etc.

      I know all this because I am an original member of AMPP (waves to L, C and all the others) . Janice recruited me to help her with PMA. I spent hours and hours and days and days on the phone with her, until my life got to be too much to handle. Something had to give and Janice was just not important. Plus I had asked for her new group's "Help" and she stopped taking my calls when I dared to ask for help. Ever since then she has had it out for AMPP, Claudine, Lorraine, me and any others she sees associated with AMPP. How dare we take away her golden moment in the spotlight. She does not want to help moms, she wants glory and to be famous, her `15 minutes of fame. She also has the hots for Lundy as she stated to me numerous times on the phone. Sadly I wish I could remember the other mom in the calls with us in the beginning stages. I do believe she has split from her scene like I did , and that mom now has her child back home (with NO help from Lundy, Janice, or PMA). So that is the reader's digest condensed version of the story.

      Delete
    4. Thanks Anon. I know Lundy is PMA, I was more or less pointing out that to back slam CPPA, who supported the launching of PMA in her dogblog articles (as in the PMA link I provided) could bite her in the ass.

      If you notice in that link, nowhere does Janice's name appear. Could that irk her? Possibly. Is she now trying to force CPPA to cut ties with AMPP? Sounds like it, but in the same two posts on the dog blog, she is insulting CPPA. Another point, will Lundy just allow that, after they supported him? Will CPPA say something? Or will they just close their eyes to the whole thing. I think it will say a lot for their character and true agenda's with how they handle this.

      Delete
  8. It appears that schied has requested a protection order against kraus's ex for stalking and it was denied. I will go view it for not info.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. more info please rachael.kraus@live.com

      Delete
  9. What's with all these people saying court is null but then use the court more than regular people! It's like saying "I hate Mike and Ikes" with a mouthful of them. Weird.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Are you going to do a video about it...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sure I have to check into it more not sure if they were married or not. But he has the same political views as they do. I am thinking it was just another flame fest gone overboard.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks, NBTDT. Interesting article about the bitch who publicly accuses my teen of being a convicted pedophile. Research much, Naomi? Go find a single shred of anything court or cps related naming my kid. Ga head, find one. Heartless winch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this just goes to show, no doubt, that Bill was behind the scenes pleading for anyone he could find to go on camera to discredit Allie. These are the only too that would answer, I guess Julia Fletcher was busy that day, but you know they were not the only ones asked.

      Delete
  13. I thought you had better things to do.

    ReplyDelete
  14. My preceding comment was in response to Shaun`s reply to my first question. ^^^

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am waiting for when he decides to try to discredit me lol. Sad thing is I don't hide anything. I am not about to spread it all the www but when confronted with it I will not hide it. You can ask Lorraine or Claudine or any of them associated with any battered mothers group (well except Janus of course lmao) and they will tell you I admit to all my shortcomings.

    You see I do that because I was taught to do otherwise would ensure I would drink or use again.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks for finally talking about > "So Who is this Naomi Woman?"
    < Loved it!

    Also visit my web site :: useful golden retriever miniature tips

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^^ Wtf? lol ^^^ Just a tad unrelated subject matter dontcha think spambot?

      Delete
    2. Must have picked up on the bitch thing. LMAO

      Delete
    3. Perfect Ninja!

      PS...check gmail.

      Delete
  17. It's sad to see someone so screwed up, and wasting oxygen like this twit. Even sadder that she has any children around her.

    SMH - soulless is a good description for Naomi

    ReplyDelete
  18. Watching Naomi in her "Before Bill" state, I am far less threatened by her and her little video. Puts some things in perspective for me as well. Who are these people who get me all stressed out out, anyway? They are the Nobodies, that's who. And they cause a little less stress with every lie they puke out.

    BTW, the prostitution thing, to each their own I guess but I'd be lying if I said I didn't laugh reading that. An ADHD hooker is funny shit. The visual is pretty funny too. I wonder if her John's were like, PTFD bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I couldn't find a way to load the PDF PACER doc so I uploaded the file on image hosting. There were 8 pages / 16 links added below:

    1) http://postimg.org/image/rvkqxe32f/
    2) http://postimg.org/image/x9jj4xssn/
    3) http://postimg.org/image/yi7eqkkqv/
    4) http://postimg.org/image/mf23309on/
    5) http://postimg.org/image/rb5pup9tz/
    6) http://postimg.org/image/ppqg2vzlz/
    7) http://postimg.org/image/jarf67sw7/
    8) http://postimg.org/image/cqk1m4phj/
    9) http://postimg.org/image/el1hhm1vr/
    10) http://postimg.org/image/g3sa8uj2f/
    11) http://postimg.org/image/jegn8q8zr/
    12) http://postimg.org/image/5ytmja0hz/
    13) http://postimg.org/image/g6c5vompz/
    14) http://postimg.org/image/bj63twzd3/
    15) http://postimg.org/image/4ovt486pz/
    16) http://postimg.org/image/ulphguadj/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This code may provide direct links:

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/ucwi4nmyz/naomi1.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/ufgdrhqmj/naomi2.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/jz09p5rm3/naomi3.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/5ral0iex7/naomi4.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/61i3jutjf/naomi5.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/5id0al24r/naomi6.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/cx2c2yo0b/naomi7.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/7rwj7llor/naomi8.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/ng2bs4qob/naomi9.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/y6ld02ex7/naomi10.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/vgc12vi8b/naomi11.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/novb4be2z/naomi12.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/hy54ql62z/naomi13.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/lt8it5p8r/naomi14.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/e9ffr3w23/naomi15.png[/img][/url]

      [url=http://postimage.org/][img]http://s7.postimg.org/stwilxr0r/naomi16.png[/img][/url]


      [url=http://postimage.org/app.php]screen shot on a pc[/url]

      Delete
    2. Nope *fail* sorry. I was trying to copy code.

      Delete
    3. 1 page to view all the docs

      http://postimg.org/gallery/7i3aadyw/995d485f/

      Delete
    4. So this is what SHE says...wonder what the father says. I need to see the evidence for her claims, because she is soulless, and heartless, and I don't believe her. LOL

      Delete
    5. I say, maybe she wouldn't have all that distress if she had paid the child support she was ordered to pay.

      Delete
    6. It's a newer ongoing lawsuit. I don't see his response in the PACER files yet. I'm sure he has a lot to say without question. He also has a lot of evidence that goes against her as long as he's looking in the right direction.

      Delete
    7. I agree NBTDT, and I also think you are right Yappy that he must have more evidence against her than her declaration lets on. Something is missing here.

      I still can't get over her irritation and intolerance to the crying baby. I am sure she did more than slip a few mickeys to her boys. She seems very non-maternal.

      Delete
    8. @ yappy: I forgot to thank you.

      Thank you for posting the suit! xxx ooo (((hugs)))

      Delete
    9. You're welcome. Let me know if you need more :)

      Delete
  20. Hey Naomi will 20.00 dollar do, ewww, I wldnt pay 5 cents for trash, I love it, ahh karmas. Bitch, you and your little hate videos, and your a 20.00 whore,

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bills Associates are really bad here in Michigan. SUch as Followers of Terry Jones. That is Extreme.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mad about what? Something other than the government?

      Delete
  22. Nbtdt this so this Marty prehn on bills call is the Michigan region who is the body guard for pastor terry jones who came to Dearborn Michigan to mess with the Arab community here. He burns korans also they are just trouble. So they are racist tea party people who are racist also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thx, Sean. I mis-read your earlier post. I thought you said mad, you said bad. Sorry.

      Delete
  23. Naomi has gone through more than any woman should, before you mock her, be aware that she has done more for Mali's Tuareg separatist rebels than any of you keyboard warriors. You are all puppets of the AMPP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont really care what she has done with the Mali's Tuareg separatist rebels, doesnt change anything

      And I can assure you, we are no one's puppet, go find a new scouting report

      Delete
    2. You don't know anything, just like Naomi doesn't know anything. "Puppets of the AMPP"? Nope, sorry, dead wrong. When Bill's minions take it upon themselves to interject their meritless, factless, and baseless opinions about those he deems "Haters" then they are going to be scrutinized.

      Naomi wrote about AMPP based on what Bill said, and not her personal knowledge. Naomi wrote about Allie, based on what Bill said, and not her personal knowledge. IF Naomi doesn't want people finding factual information about her very questionable past, then she shouldn't be out there throwing her baseless opinions onto a video.

      (Nice you just mentioned AMPP, and not Allie, you must be from the dogblog.)

      Delete
    3. Odd, I tried googling this> "Mali's Tuareg" naomi parrish (and a variety of other mixture's and last name's) but coming up empty. You'd think if she's done so much, her name would be somewhere online? NOTHING but this blog came up.

      And no sorry to burst that little bitty bubble, no one here is a puppet of anyone including AMPP. You really don't understand much do you?

      Delete
  24. So anon at 1:15pm - what has naomi done to help her daughter? What has she done to try to not fight with the father of the daughter? Because I can give you reams of papers full of lists to tell you what I have done to get along with my ex. Chairty begins at home and naomi should really work on her issues before she runs off to help everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  25. How did I find this blog? I was looking for Naomi's handmade soap. Blogspot really does allow any type of low level trash to host blogs on its site. How very sad.

    You people are truly sick, all of you. I took some time to review the links to the documents someone posted in this comment section and what I see is a woman who has been harassed by a man who uses his daughter as a weapon. There's a diagnosis for people like this, it's an incurable personality disorder, yet you call Naomi "soulless."

    None of you have the ability or will to read or critically and sympathetically analyze this case.

    You criticized her for being a prostitute, and yet she allegedly earned money to survive and in the process harmed no one, stole from no one, didn't emotionally abuse anyone in doing so.

    You showed no concern that she was raped, but hey, we can overlook that or use it to demean her, right?

    The father didn't seem to care she was a prostitute. He only wanted her money and to emotionally torment her with her daughter. If he cared, he would've told the judge up front. But no, you fail to notice that he withheld this information because he is aware of the stigma associated with her harmless activity.

    He also didn't care about the daughter having a relationship with her mother, he abandoned the kid in France for years, and these things he did, not Naomi. The child will likely suffer for a long time because of HIS actions. But you seem to think the sex germs might have jumped off Naomi and harmed her daughter, right? Idiots.

    You reference she made comments about her baby crying, yet this is something very common and yes, it can be annoying. So what? Instead of thinking about how to support new mothers who experience these things, you demonize her. Sick, sick people, every one of you.

    As for you fools claiming she should be overly concerned about "a part of her," her DNA. Why? You fail to consider how generous she was to donate her eggs so that vetted couples can have children. It makes no sense. Your idiotic blog is here on blogspot, where they love this sort of low level trash, and only those of you who are blind haters are commenting.

    Naomi is a good person, from all I have seen of her. Who cares if she's lived with grief and her daughter will too. Because sick people have nothing better to do than hate rather than make thoughtful, critical responses to some guy who is making a documentary. So you target the people whose stories he's telling.

    I'm going to be reporting your blog for harassment, if blogspot still has that feature. And I hope you all experience serious karma as a result of your online activities.

    Have a really awful day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks for flying out of left field with no clue what you are talking about. No one here cares about her personal story. We wouldn't have ever even mentioned her name EXCEPT that she willing inserted herself in to the middle of a fight between Bill Windsor and Allie Overstreet. She went on video and called out Allie for how she lives her life and called her a liar. That is why Naomi whatever her last name is today was the subject of the blog. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't be throwing rocks...and she should have thought about that before she went on the attack of someone who had nothing to do with her. So back to the peanut gallery you go.

      Delete
  26. I had internet dealings with this woman, going by Naomi Chambers, a couple of years back. I commented on one of her blogs, correcting her spelling, I felt justified as she was going on and on about her superior intellect. Well, she proceeded to use my current Facebook default picture and photoshop it to some disgusting picture along with my full name saying she was going to post it on her blog page. I threatened her with legal action. She went away. Impression I got is she is a very disturbed individual. Bad crazy.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.