Remember when Lawless America was going to save the Country by an award winning documentary movie? Well, what about the sweeping changes that would take place in Congress by way of legislation as a result of the "indisputable evidence" Bill would provide them? What about how he and his partner in crime David Shied were going to take their country back by way of citizen grand juries?
Well all of that must be put on hold indefinably, as the man who gave his own State of the Union response now needs help saving his website.
Lawless America shared a link.
SAVE LAWLESSAMERICA.COM -- OUR SITE BARELY WORKS NOW THAT WE ARE AT ENOM, SO WE ARE ADVERTISING FOR A JOOMLA CONSULTANT.
Ahhh yes, how the mighty have fallen. And while he spends his days and nights reading this blog trying to figure out how to subpoena a cookie and some farm animals, his confused followers keep dropping off or end up institutionalized. Yes, these are troubling times for the so called Revolutionary Party, as their dictator in chief has gone awol from reality and has no clue which road to take to get back. Ohhh and one other little thing, you know Bill's youtube account? Yes that one that holds all the video footage that he has uploaded from his fake movie for two years? Yeah, ummmm, he kinda forgot his password and can't log in to it any more. Have we taken our country back?
Dear Dum Dum,
ReplyDeleteIt has come to my attention that you have reported to the Lafeyette county courthouse that I am evading service of your ridiculous subpoena. POPPYCOCK! I'm not evading anything. You simply do not have the right address and do not know where I reside. I moved in November. And if you think I'm going to tell you where I DO live, you are out of your mutha funkin mind!!!!!! I'll give you a lil hint though, its not in Cass County. Lol. Good luck boob! I might just show up anyway. I got some step dancin to do. Adios cabrone!
P.s. urine idjit!
Speaking of urine, it occurs to me that that as the lifelong CEO of his own companies, BW would not have to jump thru the normal hurdles of office life, such as: working for a bad boss, cooperating with his peers, waiting for a raise, or submitting to a routine background check or drug test. Many of us have obtained through hard work an integrity that his money can't buy. Stay strong friends.
DeleteGinger, does this mean he can't delete our comments?
ReplyDeleteyes, if he is telling the truth....always a strong possibility
DeleteOooooh goody! Boy am I gonna be busy tonight!
DeleteNope sorry.... he now has it set so all comments have to be approved by the lord himself... Nothing will get through.
DeleteBlah! Oh well. He still can't handle the trooth I guess.
DeleteA single woman will get through....*~*Redd*~*
Delete"I am sitting outside Carmen Isheim's home in St. George, Utah. She is camping, but she has been located thanks to Facebook Friends Michelle Welker and Terri Young! I placed a letter in her mailbox, so we'll see what happens. This likely means that I spend yet another day in Cedar City/St. George. But it's worth the chance that she identifies the killers."
ReplyDeleteUmmm, Mail Fraud!!!! We have admitted Mail Fruad!!
Read 18 USC 1341. The USPS and all its resources are to be used only for honest practices.
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_wire_fraud
only a Mail man can put things in a Mailbox..... I hope she is creep out that he went to her home and calls the police
DeleteActually anyone can put stuff into your mailbox it is taking it out and keeping it and opening it etc. that is the crime.
DeleteNot true. Very not true.
DeleteBy all means sean test that out for us then: ask your mail carrier to watch while you put something in your neighbors mailbox make a video of you doing it
DeleteActually, it can be considered mailbox tampering for anyone other than a postal employee to put things in a mail box, as the box is considered federal property. http://www.ehow.com/about_6329596_mail-tampering-according-federal-law.html
DeleteSlam dunk:
Deletehttp://www.ehow.com/info_8149288_laws-can-put-mail-boxes.html
http://www.ehow.com/list_7216408_consequences-putting-flyers-mailbox.html
No Sean, you're incorrect.
Deletehttp://usgovinfo.about.com/od/consumerawareness/a/Can-You-Deliver-The-Mail-Yourself.htm
"U.S. Postal Service regulations ban Americans from placing anything inside a mailbox that hasn't been routed through the agency's massive network of processing and distribution facilities across the nation. "
Sean, I suggest you and your friend Marty Prehn test your theory.
DeleteAside from it being fairly common knowledge, why don't people at least look it up before posting crap?
Brannon and LNM I stand corrected but I believe that the post office is not going enforce this infringement probably unless the postal customer at the residence calls the postmaster general or office itself to make a report. Hence if my lawn mowing service leave me my bill after mowing the lawn in the mail box i don't intend on reporting them. This should clarify my previous remarks where I was going with that. I would say BW's letter would be of the unwanted version probably. And to ANON who posts. I suggest maybe you should talk to Marty Prehn. I am not a friend of his at all. LOL. What laugh that was.
DeleteWouldn't hurt you to cut your own grass.
DeleteYou stand corrected but? Can't you admit your blanket statement was wrong and leave it at that Sean?
DeleteBill wasn't leaving his bill for a customer he has. He's stalking a woman he has no right to stalk and in the process committed a crime. He stepped over the line with this one.
Your previous remarks were clear that it wasn't a crime and you were wrong.
DeleteSadly, I have experience with this through a previous stalker. It is a crime, however, no one really cares to do anything about it. Around tax time, for years my ex would take my credit card receipts, tax documentation and once even had his sister pose as my sister and go with my kids and ask for my mail at our rural post office. They gave it to her. The post office and the lawyers I talked with said that sadly, nothing could be done unless I could prove that taking the mail had harmed me financially. Indeed, I even had trouble getting BACK the mail that was taken.
DeletePBBBBTTTTT! Whatever Susan.
DeleteSpeaking of owning your own SHIT Susan, which you've never done, the Attorney's new post on the other thread is one of the greatest pieces to date !
DeleteHe describes you perfectly.
A perfect summation of Susan = a female Windsor
DeleteQuotes from the Attorney:
Once again, you submit thoughtless, absurd nonsense that simply ignores a myriad of other possibilities.
Unlike you, I was (and remain) well aware of the fact that I don't know everything; unlike you, I have no intention of pretending that there could not be relevant circumstances that lie outside of my knowledge.
. . . because of your interminable arrogance and the stunning insouciance with which you toss off overconfident and oversimplified, if not outright false, legal analyses of matters being discussed on this blog. Your unethical and objectionable behavior brings shame and embarrassment on my profession (much as Bill Windsor's not dissimilar behavior does), and it risks harming layperson readers who encounter your careless decrees and don't know enough law to question or doubt them.
I challenge and dispute your statements because both my profession and the general blog-reading public deserve better than your behavior.
Susan is so desperate to discredit the blog and point fingers at the tiniest thing because she is an outcast. Not wanted here just like her sicko bf. So she has to find disagreements in a pathetic attempt to belittle. Dig deeper Susan because you looking foolish jealous and well -desperate ;-)
DeleteBesides the mail fraud why does he think this woman will welcome him loitering in front of her home, illegally placing a note in her mailbox, and asking to tape her?
ReplyDeleteI am pretty sure if she was a witness to a crime, she would have been called by the proper authorities in the case. Why does Windbag think he's going to get new information? And why would she tell HIM of all people. He is just a flippen nut. Nice to know he can get his Facebook peeps to help him stalk strangers. NOT!
I hope she is scared enough to call the police. He has no right to show up at people's homes like that. The man has such nerve. Maybe he'll call on the wrong home someday and someone will put an end to his stalking 'witnesses'. Bill is it? Meet my very protective pitbull, how fast can you run dude?
DeleteAnd again, the man had cirrhosis of the liver, Hep C, told the prison he wanted his mothers liver and I think filed a form for it, told them he was dying, was an alcoholic, (was previously arrested the week prior to this deal for DUI) suicidal, and had numerous other medical conditions. The man was on borrowed time. If the wife is pissed that he is gone, then perhaps she shouldn't have enabled his drinking and unhealthy lifestyle.
Delete@Allie I know right. Who even thinks this is remotely ok? This woman doesn't want to be harassed. But, it goes to show how far those little followers of his will go, which is totally frightening. And since he proudly posted the names of his accomplices in this ordeal, I hope they get in trouble too. Is just NOT COOL!
DeleteOh and not just her did he stalk and post address of on his FB, his stalker cohorts also posted her family members and their address as well.
DeleteExactly Ninja. She's upset he's dead but didn't bother her the amount he drank?
Deletewho want to bet. he took pictures of her house and will post later after he get what he wants from her! or to punish her for not helping
DeleteBeen gone for days dog sitting, and had no internet...so I am behind. Who is Carmen Isheim? and why is Bill having people stalk her so he can leave her notes? Beyond the creepy factor, and the pie man seems to be breaking new laws, err ground with the note in the mailbox trick...
ReplyDeleteCan anyone give me the cliff notes here?
She is a woman Bill suspects witnessed what he says is the murder of an inmate. NBTDT posted the back story on the previous post about this guy. So, he called upon his lemmings to hunt down any and all information (even social security number was requested) on her, and her family. One of his people even found this poor woman's divorce records and posted it. That's what brings us to the mail fraud. He is just beyond respecting anyone's privacy or breaking laws.
Delete(and who knows if this is even the right woman ya know)
thanks Ninja, it all makes sense in a billy the boob sort of way.
DeleteIt won't matter if she is the right one, and it is always disturbing that he wants ss# .
She will regret any contact with him. How the hell did she witness a murder of an inmate? Is she a jail employee? I hope this latest pie hits him in the face in a big way.;)
Very true Oceans. I hope she steers clear of B.T.B.(LOL)
DeleteI think she worked there as a deputy. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. They said she got sick or something that night, and never came back to work.
That was my understanding Ninja. The woman was a CO there. I've been saying for months he's going to harass the wrong home one day. Hopefully it's not when he sends a CHILD to the door. In my opinion....yes even other citizens can have one ya old coot.
Deletewww.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...ca10.../USCOURTS-ca10-06-04315-0.pdf
DeleteOh my, this guy was a mess!! Interesting read...and I still don't see a reason to suspect murder.
I just watched his little video about Ray, and what he describes as the signs of the beating, are the normal signs of a decomposing body. People bloat after death. And with his liver not functioning, there was excess fluid as well. (There are numerous articles on this subject, that explain everything he claimed was from being beaten, here is just one.) He is such a fricken joke. Mr. wanna be Judge, Jury, Executioner, and now Medical Forensic Examiner.
Delete..."that gas will cause the body to bloat, the eyes to bulge out of their sockets and the tongue to swell and protrude."
http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/human-biology/dying4.htm
Bill is a very stupid man Ninja. He's siding with the circus freak show because NO decent intelligent person will bring them their legitimate case at this point. The good ones are all gone, he's scraping the bottom.
Deleteactually at this point anon, he is done with the barrel, and now scraping his shoe bottoms.
DeleteHe's starting to look like a barrel with that weight gain. He's having trouble standing straight, and he's also having trouble breathing.
DeleteTrue he is beneath the bottom I just like pointing it out. Such as this comment
Delete"Lawless America They also claimed he fell down the stairs. As you can see, there is only one floor"
Oh look at the garden, and the multi level building in the back.
http://humanflowerproject.com/index.php/weblog/comments/flowers_in_purgatory/
Someone else confirming there are stairs. Seems there are stairs all over that place.
Delete"Tracie Sullivan No, there are stairs in purgatory. I've been through that jail as a reporter several times and there is a downstairs."
LOL A bit defensive about the stairs? Ha Ha. See Bill, when you make emphatic statements when you really DONT know the truth, you solidify that you are a moron.
DeleteLawless America What is downstairs? He was in a cell directly behind the admissions area as I understand it.
Tracie Sullivan you have to walk down stairs to get to the cells
Someone should drop a dime on the local sheriff and let them know about the nut who rolled into town.
ReplyDeleteOh they know, he said he got permission to film outside. I wonder though, if they would like the photo and description of their facility.
DeleteLawless America changed their cover photo.
38 minutes ago.
CHAMBER OF HORRORS - THE PURGATORY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN HURRICANE (PURGATORY) UTAH.
This us where I believe Ray Boyett was tortured and murdered by three sheriff's deputies.
Ray Boyett was an alcoholic with serious liver damage, and hepatitis, and mental issues. He was also a drama queen...he was seen by the staff for everything. He died from a heart problem- 90% occlusion!
DeleteAs usual, Billy is making no sense and is jumping whatever conclusion it takes to get to the pie...
Just thought I would give you an update on little Joey. He was in Tennessee Colony, then was transported to the Robertson Unit near Abilene about 2 weeks ago, and has now been sent to Pecos County (Fort Stockton) on the Lynaugh Unit. His current custody level is G2, which requires him to live in a dorm and he can work only under armed supervision. He is allowed 3 contact visits per month (but not congetial lol). Guess that leaves his butt buddies out.
ReplyDeleteAwww well thanks for the update asswipe
DeleteLittle Joey is a piece of crap. I think this blog should rename itself to something more descriptive of the LA circus.
DeleteStop with that. That's petty, perverted and vindictive. There is no reason to attack Joey. Its over, its done with leave it alone.
DeleteIf someone wants to get in touch with him they can contact Brannon
Can't you see none of us are laughing at Joey's fate? Time to move on buddy. Joey is serving hard time for his crime but you still seem to want more?
DeleteHahaha duck cause the fan is on full blast and something was just thrown. Cannot offer any more than that but it is going to be extra special ;-)
ReplyDeletePromises, promises.
DeleteAnonymous 1:01 doesn't understand the major skeletons we've collected and been saving for a rainy day. Can't wait
DeleteOh the internet reveals lots of skeletons. You do not even know who I am discussing in the post above at 101 am. And yes that is me anon 101. Hey that's pretty cool kinda like 007. Anyway I digress (or go off on an add voyage lol). As the old saying goes you will just have to wait and see. I am thrilled that my four hours of Googling and binging has paid off tremendously. And i must say one person is absolutely exquisite in leaving a footprint on this great big www. Lvin' it! Hahahahahahahahaha muahahahahaha hasta la vista behbee
ReplyDeleteOk if you're so smart, spill. Why wait?
DeleteMaybe I want to have Christmas in July? Kind of sounds a little fun.
Deletewhat I thought, nothing but hot air
Deletethanks for playing
This is something I want to savor lol. And what of the 'threat' that the internet holds lots of skeletons? Guess what? My skeletons are all out of the closet doing the watusi (well right now they are doing their own rendition of thriller lmao)
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhflzGDiDIM
Muahahahaha........
YAWN
DeleteYes you're so scary I'm sure we'll lose sleep over you Florida.... like all the others before you who claimed they searched & located identities from screen names. Funny how all those behind you ended up wrong 100% of the time.
Anon101: please dont let out of the bag that Im actuallyan alien...that needs to remain secret...or my alien clan will come down from Planet fhdndjd and take you away, just saying
DeleteThis has nothing to do with Joey or the clubhouse. It has to do with bill and others. Now come on. If you look back you will see that.
DeleteOkay, okay...I admit it: I spent a weekend with Jonathan Frakes. I was just standing there waiting for my elevator. The door opened and he stared at me....and then he kissed me. And he's a good kisser too! Uh huh, true story.
DeleteYou said we had to "duck" so the assumption was made it was for us. Thanks for the clarification.
DeleteSo anon at 618, I am not into revealing the joeys as doggy calls ya. I actually think you all are kinda cool, ESP my alpaca. Well our alpaca. So don't get your panties all wadded, K?
DeleteI stayed at a motel 6 once and left all the lights on and the TV blaring.
DeleteUm no panties wadded here.
DeleteAnon101 is childish.
DeleteThe Windsors are now divorced.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cobbsuperiorcourtclerk.org/courts/docAltiffFS.asp?tiffFile=T4558063&pagesFile=1&currPage=1&cfn=20130093270&blocked=N
I hope that isn't the groundbreaking news thats been dangled for the past few days.
DeleteCan you post it so that we can read it?
DeleteSurely this isn't the downfall news we have been holding our breath for?
If you watch his video where he calls DA Scott Garrett's office he looks totally heartbroken for a guy who just lost his wife. *rolling eyes* What an ass. He's all giddy.
ReplyDeleteComment posted in the wrong spot. Should be under the divorce news. Sorry
DeleteIs this REALLY happening?? I mean this is the reality show that Hollywood missed on.
ReplyDeleteTIMELINE COMMENT LAWLESS AMERICA
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=317162205084744&set=a.267168686750763.1073741826.267163020084663&type=1&theater
Lawless America Wayne, did you look at many of the photos? I saw them all after you left, and I've never seen any such thing. And I hope I never again see anything like that. Men, imagine if someone inserted a metal tube in your backside and blew air into your scrotum to blow it up like a balloon. That was just one of the horrific things that was done to a man who was in jail due to a clerical error...and because he had seen law enforcement officials involved with drugs and money...they wanted to silence him.
Monday at 01:52 · Like · 2
http://www.examiner.com/article/is-it-illegal-to-put-a-note-a-mailbox-without-mailing-it
ReplyDeleteDuh! The person who said otherwise is pretty misinformed.
DeleteNow I am getting FB friend requests from a lady that says she friends many ppl on the LA page and she's a victim advocate. Plant. Really Dum Dum? Do you honestly think it will be THAT easy with ME? I haven't been associated or on any LA page for quite some time now, and this lady is just now sending me a friend request? No boob, you won't be winning this one. Sorry.
ReplyDeletepost her name...... Please
DeleteWillita D Bush. Apparently a follower of the boob. She sent the request and I saw we had no friends in common so I indexed her and.....hold on. I'll just go copy the message.
Deletea I'm sorry, do I know you? I try to be careful who I allow as friends on my page and I see we have no mutual friends. Yesterday at 7:00am Willita D. Bush I am FB friends with several people from the lawless america page. I help the people and victims. See www.willitabush.com Thanks Yesterday at 7:14am · Sent from Web a Bill is a psycho and I have nothing to do with him. Thank you anyways.
DeleteThen I blocked her. Like I said, I haven't been on anything associated with LA except the anti pages in several months. She's a plant. The boob is desperately trying to find me and I'm sure she was a spy. Lol. Well, first of all, I'm not a boob, BOOB! And even if you could get one of your lemmings to infiltrate my fortress, you'd find nothing. It would be much easier on you if you just accepted the fact that EVERYONE is smarter than you. Even my 10 yr old son. My cat, the lunchmeat in my fridge....ALL SMARTER THAN YOU.
LMAO "My cat, the lunchmeat in my fridge....ALL SMARTER THAN YOU."
DeleteThe lint in my dryer, the litter box.............
Deletethank you.....
DeleteA few "Must Know" Latin terms:
ReplyDeletede jure -- concerning law
de facto -- concerning fact
de fatso -- concerning Bill Windsor
delouse -- unfriending LA on FB
Deletede brief -- what a hotel has to do when BW skips out, leaving only his dirty underwear.
DeleteBilly loves his own underwear...it's his only action that's truly color-able.
Deletede bill Ask Barb...she just finished doing that.
Deletede cease -- ignoring BW's PPO's
ReplyDeletede fence -- what BW crawls under when stalking
Deletede feat -- what BW will resort to use when lemmings quit paying for his gas
Deletede greed -- why BW keeps begging for donations
DeleteI'm fairly certain pietard cannot see de feet over de gut....
Deletede lay -- what Ooga Boobies promised BW for moving her up on the list
ReplyDeletede liver -- that failing organ that gives BW his bloated, shakey appearance
Deletede mon -- who BW buys his ganja from
DeleteI hope thatwhen I arrest him for being a peeping tom, he dosent drop de soap....
ReplyDeleteSo did anybody get any toliet paper today???
de duce -- what BW leaves at every rest stop
DeleteUmmmmm... Yuk!!!!
Deletede plane -- what Tattoo just saw.
DeleteDe vorce ---- pietard and babsie as of monday
DeleteHey Tiny, I am making Posters about pie man to put in my front yard, when he come to the north east .... one said Bill Windsor for lawless america support people that killed 32 police Officer
DeleteNice... I have some to. No trespassing, mine field, watch for flying projectiles, ya know.. stuff like that...
DeletePer sources sheid is still pursuing a law to allow him to have his own grand juries with a rep in michigan. Good thing is they are not just going to write up something like he wants that is not realistic. He is not using the lawless names anymore.
ReplyDeleteGood find. Do you know what name he is using? Schied still hasn't denounced his involvement with Lawless America/William Windsor, so it could be a ruse. Windsor said DS was his #2, so they could be plotting a scheme under a different name now, since BW has completely discredited the LA name as well as his own. Maybe DS is going to take the lead in this venture.
DeleteJust his normal name
DeleteI think he is holding meetings at his place now !!!
DeleteInteresting. Well, I don't know how far he will get being shackled to Bill Windsor and his heinous reputation. Searching for David Schied usually puts him together with Lawless America and William M Windsor.
Delete@ Sean: Is Schied posting his activity? Do David & Trish have a new web site or FB page?
DeletePardon me, but I need to test the html code for posting pics here. I'm trying to help others who have asked how to do it. Hopefully this will work.
ReplyDeleteTEST
Nope. Test #2...
Delete[IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/xcoz7q.jpg[/IMG]
Nope. Giving up.
DeleteThat's how, but Bigfoot won't allow it.
DeleteI mean Blogspot. Lol
DeleteBlah. Oh well. I guess just the fb ppl get to enjoy my funniness.
DeleteI saw it people need to just cut and paste this....http://i42.tinypic.com/xcoz7q.jpg
Delete[IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/zwghm9.jpg[/IMG]
ReplyDeletehttp://i39.tinypic.com/zwghm9.jpg
ReplyDeleteNOW someone named Michelle Welker has sent me a friend request. I don't have any mutual friends with her either. Does anyone know who she is? Maybe she has nothing to do with LA but I don't accept total strangers on my page anyway. I'm just gonna have to make my privacy settings only allow friends of friends to send me anything.
ReplyDeleteShes the woman working for bill finding people say no and that she is not someone you know she will be banned from adding people
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=317162205084744&set=a.267168686750763.1073741826.267163020084663&type=1&theater
ReplyDeleteYou don't want to go and piss off Bitler now Brannon, he might drive by and take pictures of your house in the dark like some peeping tom koward. Oh, wait........nevermind......
ReplyDeleteHeck ya! Ill friend the plants too!!
hahaha Tiny
ReplyDeleteI see Mark S filed a motion for an all writs injunction in allie's case. Care to dive into that one Attorney? I may have to do the same soon.
ReplyDeleteYes, I see that on the Missouri court database. Unfortunately, that database only has document titles, not scans of the documents (in the manner of the federal PACER database)—so we're left to guess at what the bases for Mr. Supanich's motions are.
DeleteI'm all but positive that at least one grounds for his Motion to Dismiss is lack of personal jurisdiction. Otherwise, it's very hard to tell what he's saying without reviewing the documents he's filed.
Mr. Attorney, Can you please tell us what a motion for an all writs injunction is?.....and can it be used as a way of a non lawyer to act like a lawyer in a case?
DeleteSorry I read the last post wrong.... no need answer me Attorney
ReplyDeleteWell, I'm not even a John Doe, I'm an actual name in the lawsuit and I don't even know what he's suing me for because I haven't been served. I live in Clay County now not Cass and he doesn't have my address. Think I outta give it to him so I can find out what I'm being sued for?
ReplyDeleteNoooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteOh why not Tiny? I mean, I have nothing to hide. I openly admit I think Bill Windsor is a ridiculous boob. I have to assume that's what I'm being sued for since he filed the lawsuit before I ever came to this page and started making fun of him. Oh, wait. That couldn't be it. I hadn't openly said anything before he filed. Hmmmmmmm......could it be? Is the Trooth being sued because of the TRUTH? NOOOOOO! That would just be down right crazy! Surely Bill isn't suing me for telling the truth! Is that even possible? :-)
DeleteIf you are not legally served it makes his life much more difficult. It is his job to find and serve you. Until then keep quiet. Right now I'm named in 13 other suits by another vexatious wackjob, I have not been served, so she is sol! Same goes for you and pietard. Shhhhhhhh. I will defer to attorney if need be.. Not like other "people"
Delete[IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/wtd4j5.jpg[/IMG]
DeleteOh, I know. I wasn't serious! I have children. I'm not going to give a psycho my address! Lol. I filmed in Oct. And moved in Nov. The address he has is old and I don't even live in that county anymore. And nothing where I do live is in my name soooooo.......good luck boob. Good luck.
[IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/iz9ssx.jpg[/IMG]
ReplyDeletehello..this is so off the subject but I just deleted myself off facebook and now I just joined twitter..so how dose twitter work?? and how do I get on this blog with american mothers political party?? by my spelling some of you might know who I am..lol
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Sounds fishy.
DeleteNot buying it, sister.
Oh yeah! I know you! You're the pathetic wretch who was on Facebook, now Twitter and can't spell. Yeah. You're real unique across the web!
DeleteTroll.
I am not a troll... unique across the ,,yes.. now I feel bad about deleting my facebook.. and for you who said not buying it sister.. well I wish you would.... ok ..its me schied x- wife.. yes I do have issues righ now.. and probley need help.. but just so you know..I mean well and I am not a bad person
DeleteDon't worry about the comments above, they weren't personal. Some people have made comments as Anons with big news, or something, and some people are suspicious of generic comments.
DeleteHere is a twitter link to AMPP. You might be able to reactivate your facebook account. Sorry you are going through such a hard time. I hope you can connect directly with AMPP and they can help you.
https://twitter.com/AMPPUSA
thanks...oxox
DeleteHere is the website, you don't need facebook to get in touch with them. Use the contact feature to get in touch with Claudine / Lorraine http://americanmotherspoliticalparty.org/
Deletewelcome I don't know much about twitter, still learning the ropes and this blog isn't the AMPP's but a few of them comment here from time to time. Just post what you want on here, that's it.
ReplyDeleteI know this blog isn't the AMMPP'S ..This is joeyisalittlekid blog.. I have posted things on here !! my last post was to gingersnap a week ago. I was on AMMPP'S facebook page but for person reasons deleted my facebook account.. not because of anyone on my facebook page.. but because of whats going on in my life..I need to lay low..
ReplyDeleteSo what's the point of posting here or asking how to get on this blog with the AMPP's? Just post what you want to say or better yet? Lay low if it's that important. SMH if it means risking your kids, why don't you choose not to post. This isn't a support group so I have no idea why you're here.
DeleteTroll running a confidence scam. Don't feed it and it'll go away.
DeleteThe Joeyisalittekid clubhouse twitter feed is set to private and probably will be closed. I do not agree with having anyone use it as a platform to push their stories. I do not support Lori Handrahan or what she or her ex has done to Mila. Take your agenda's elsewhere.
ReplyDeleteWhether you agree or disagree, you're entitled to your opinion. It was meant for fun and as a promo for this blog. Thank you for understanding.
DeleteWell Walter is back posting on LA's FB tormenting Bill again. Besides the fact it's just really bad taste and poor manners, Walter really ought to check out the laws in her state. Bill might just have a cause of action for unauthorized use of a deceased person's name. In TX, Walter could be liable for damages under the TX Property Code, Title 4. Actions and Remedies, Sec. 26.013.
ReplyDeleteHere's a question for Attorney. How many John Doe's does it take to file a Emergency Petition for Hospitalization on BW?
ReplyDeleteIt has to be a court order or a family member.
DeleteI assumed as much and it was a rhetorical question, tongue in cheek.
DeleteHowever, judges have been known to sign off on weirder things. Bunch of John Doe's might at least get someone's attention.
I'm anything but an expert in that area of law, but I'm not aware of any policy in any U.S. jurisdiction under which a bunch of unidentified people can successfully petition to have somebody locked up. That would be a bit, er, troublesome constitutionally.
DeleteYou're here Attorney? Susan is upset with you on the other thread.
DeleteI know, shocking news.
Understood, but how is it BW seeks actions against Job Doe's? Unidentified persons and nonspecific damages?
DeleteMaybe I'm tired and out of patience but that post totally annoyed me. If you have to ask this question "how is it BW seeks actions against Job Doe's?", you don't "Understood" anything.
DeleteBill doesn't know the names of the people he wants to sue. He hopes to learn the names. Until he knows the names, the people are listed as John Does. How many John Does have shown up in court? Are you worried? Did you give him your name, address, phone number? SSN? Employer's name? If not, I wouldn't lose very much sleep over it.
John Does can not petition the court to have Bill put away because "That would be a bit, er, troublesome constitutionally." Think about it for a few minutes - do you want a bunch of people with names of cookies, farm animals and 1,000 Anonymous deciding they don't like what you do and say so a Judge puts you in mental hospital because they all sign letter to say that's where you should be for your own good.
Whoa. Someone got a hold of some bad chip dip...
DeleteNbtdt maybe if billy boy would file against a cookie, a ninja, the tooth, some farm and exotic animals, and various other oddball thins, we would not have to ask that he be admitted lmao ;-) he would get picked for that special bus all on his own. I know it wouldn't happen that way but it would be kind of funny to see a lawsuit against gingersnap the Cookie, a pai, an alpaca, a ninja cat, a dragon who build round houses, a man with tiny feet and hands, and another animal who has nothing better to do. Billy boy would be the laughing stock.
DeleteSusan is upset with you on the other thread.
DeleteYes, I saw that. That Anon's projection is incredible; after having had her overconfident and unnuanced legal assertions repeatedly refuted without once conceding an error, she accuses me of (1) incompetence and (2) refusal to concede error? It's frankly bizarre.
Regardless of what she does for a job, that person is clearly very successful in her hobby as an internet troll. I'll still challenge dubious statements of law she makes when and if I see them (for the reasons I explained on that thread), but there's really not much point to responding to comments of hers that do nothing but taunt and insult.
It seems to me that the age-old "don't feed the trolls" online rule is actually less justified than most Net denizens believe—sometimes trolls severely degrade the standard of discourse on a discussion forum, and as a result letting them continue without objection amounts to giving them free rein to obliterate a worthwhile community—but that person's excesses on this blog may be one circumstance in which the clichéd rule is justified.
If you show me where you refuted something I said
DeleteI have done that repeatedly. You are welcome to review my comments.
I will happily own my error.
That has demonstrably not been your prior practice. Instead, in each case you have run away from the issue, either throwing a childish tantrum or trying to change the subject.
Backing up a few lines:
DeleteI sincerely don't remember you ever REFUTING anything I have said. I remember you QUESTIONING fundamental statements of law, but refuting...no.
You are, yet again, radically mistaken. On the past two comment threads in which we have conversed, I have either refuted your statements or exposed the baseless presumptions inherent in them over and over again. This is obvious to anyone who simply reads the threads, but given your convenient lapses of memory whenever accuracy would prove to be troublesome to you, it would appear to be useful to refute you yet again. Which is what I now intend to do.
To be continued.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #1 (June 10):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/nyh8gn8 :
Your "WTF Missouri" comment sounded like you thought it highly unusual that they don’t follow the FRCP rule numbers.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/n7cxbfs :
It communicated nothing of the kind. Instead, it conveyed my feeling that categorizing the overwhelmingly common Motion to Dismiss under the unwieldy rule number 55.27 is notably convoluted and ugly. What I said is that Rule 55.27 is "a terrible name." You bizarrely inferred from that statement that I was surprised and/or previously unaware that some states "don’t follow the FRCP rule numbers"—a notion that finds no support in my "terrible name" comment.
To the contrary, all of three paragraphs above my "terrible name" comment, I had specifically pointed out that Missouri might not "follow the FRCP rule numbers":
So, again presuming that somebody has been properly served, my guess is that we’ll see a motion to dismiss (also known, though maybe not in Missouri (?), as a "Rule 12 motion") reasonably soon.
Where in the world you got the idea that I needed to be informed that different states number their procedural rules differently I have no idea.
--
You made a statement. I refuted it. You responded by running away and and have thenceforth entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #2 (June 10):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/l7qvjl3 :
As far as I can tell "Attorney" and Life in Pierce County are in good standing here, meaning they have not yet dared to disagree with any of your [Ginger Snap’s] doctrine[.]
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/n7cxbfs :
False. I have openly disagreed with and corrected Ginger repeatedly on this blog. I have, however, done all that with somewhat more tact than you apparently feel moved to display.
--
You made a statement. I refuted it. You responded by running away and and have thenceforth entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #3 (June 10):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/l7qvjl3 :
I don’t see you [Ginger Snap] taking the time to explain to them [Attorney and Stacy “Life in Pierce County” Emerson] why their request to stop the anon posting will not be granted.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/n7cxbfs :
I have never requested that Ginger "stop the anon posting." I don’t recall seeing Ms. Emerson make any such request, either. I have no interest in telling the proprietor of this forum how he ought to run it. She and I, instead, have suggested that commenters on this blog post under pseudonyms (or their real names, if they prefer) rather than anonymously.
--
You made a statement. I refuted it. You responded by running away and and have thenceforth entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #4 (June 10):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/n8k5vzn :
All I’m saying is that since you [Ginger Snap] DO claim to respect them [Attorney and Stacy "Life in Pierce County" Emerson], I would expect you to have the courtesy to respond to their suggestions/queries.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/kdhqcua :
To reiterate, I have no expectation that Ginger will respond in any way at all to the Attorney/Emerson suggestion that commenters here eschew anonymous posting in favor of pseudonymous posting. I did not direct that suggestion to Ginger, and I do not consider it the slightest bit disrespectful of him not to have responded to it.
When I have criticized and/or corrected Ginger on issues other than this one, I have found his responses to be entirely respectful and appropriate—which is not to say that we agree on all of the issues involved; in fact, I gather we don’t. I believe and hope that Ginger feels that my submissions have been likewise respectful.
--
You made a statement. I refuted it. You then ran away and entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #5 (May 27):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/ltsfp37 :
Missouri has no interest in and therefore no power to compel an out of state ISP to provide the identity of an out of state poster unless the offending post somehow targeted or involved Missouri.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/lhdb8ag :
It’s simply obvious (isn’t it?) that any statement posted on the internet "involve[s] Missouri," in that anything posted on the internet is available to and therefore, at least in theory, is read in Missouri.
To the extent that Windsor’s lawsuit is a defamation lawsuit, the publication element—i.e., the transmission of the allegedly defamatory statement to someone other than the publisher himself—clearly "involve[s] Missouri," because all of the relevant statements were published in Missouri as well as everywhere else on the planet that has unfettered access to the internet.
So declaring that Missouri "has no interest in" Windsor’s claims "unless the offending post somehow targeted or involved Missouri" simply begs the question: does an internet defamation suit like this necessarily "involve[ ]" Missouri?
--
You made a statement. I exposed the unfounded presumption inherent in that statement. You claimed that you would address the problem ("before I take the time to support my comment on the jurisdictional issue...."), but you never did. You then ran away (covering your cowardly retreat with a sneering insult—“I will refrain from listing the flaws in your hypothesis, but it is clear that as you say, torts and PJ are not your forte’”) and entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #6 (May 28):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/m2a6zmg :
[I]t is my understanding that your practice does not involve civil litigation.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/kds6jy9 :
You are mistaken. My practice involves almost nothing but civil litigation.
--
You made a statement. I both refuted and exposed the baseless overconfidence inherent in that statement. You then ran away and entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #8 (May 28):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/m2a6zmg :
I don’t recall seeing any citations in your posts here.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/kds6jy9 :
Again, you’re mistaken. I have in fact posted a handful of citations in my contributions to this blog.
--
You made a statement. I both refuted and exposed the baseless overconfidence inherent in that statement. You then ran away and entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #7 (May 29):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/lrkylv7 :
Interested readers [of my declarations] can always ask for more detail[.]
A simple request for clarification would have been sufficient.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/llvlozo :
Interested readers are also capable of being badly misled by (presumably unintentional) implications of few-word contributions that lack relevant nuance. Oversimplified legal analyses can be very dangerous, as I hope you recognize.
[....]
Readers without an extensive legal background had no idea that "a simple request for clarification" was even necessary to elucidate issues that you glossed over.
Presuming, as it appears, that you don't have a relevant citation regarding the application of the International Shoe doctrine to internet defamation cases, I don't particularly need further clarification from you. The people who do need it wouldn't know that they need to ask you for it. Such are the pitfalls of oversimplification.
--
You made a statement. I exposed the baseless overconfidence inherent in that statement. You then ran away and entirely failed to address the issue.
Refutation/Exposure of Baseless Overconfidence #9 (May 29):
DeleteStatement @ http://tinyurl.com/lrkylv7 :
I was speaking about the scenario you mentioned, where Windsor, who has no ties to Missouri, attempts to bring claims there against an out of state defendant, who presumably lacks sufficient general contacts with Missouri.
Attorney response @ http://tinyurl.com/llvlozo :
First, the International Shoe standard only requires sufficient contacts, not sufficient general contacts, in order to meet the Constitutional requirement for personal jurisdiction. In order to defeat a personal jurisdiction defense, Windsor would not need to demonstrate that Missouri has general jurisdiction over any defendant.
Second, how can you possibly "presume" that the defendants lack sufficient contacts with Missouri? Windsor has explicitly alleged that the defendants have continually defamed him on the internet. Both the internet and the allegedly defamatory statements the defendants posted on it are widely available in Missouri. Are those facts not enough to establish sufficient contacts (or even sufficient general contacts) with Missouri—for the purposes of Missouri’s long-arm statute and state and federal case law pertaining to personal jurisdiction?
--
You made a statement. I exposed the baseless overconfidence inherent in that statement. I also directly exposed the fact that you had applied an irrelevant legal standard to the question—an error that would, under some factual circumstances, destroy your entire argument. You then ran away and entirely failed to address either issue.
Indeed, in response to the above refutations and exposures of your errors, you elected not to address any of your mistakes but rather to throw your infamous "as I read through your various posts, I can see that your knowledge is far more advanced than mine" tantrum. As I’ve indicated more than once since, such a petulant and childish response is an indicator of the confidence you have in your ability to discuss matters relevantly and rationally, not to mention a signal that your motives on this blog have nothing to do with conducting respectful discussion or seeking the truth.
To conclude, then:
DeleteAs I said and have now proved, Anonymous, I have repeatedly refuted and/or exposed the baseless overconfidence inherent in statement after statement you have posted on this blog. And your unceasing tendency in response has been to duck and dodge every issue, not infrequently utilizing insults and tantrums to cover your cowardly escape. In the long list, above, of your misstatements and my corrections of same, you have not once admitted error or even communicated anything short of overwhelming confidence in your declarations.
In short, as I have now demonstrated, your entire behavior with regard to me (not that you've treated anyone else here any better) reveals you to be a coward, a boor, and a troll. A duty to defend the image of my profession (not to mention to protect the public from your miseducation) may force me in the future to respond to you in order to continue refuting your fallacies and exposing your thoughtlessness, but clearly your behavior is not worth anyone's time.
Did y'all see Susan's party of 1 blog? She's fucking cray cray, certifiable cray cray.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of hours she spends obsessing over us and our comments is amazing. She provides a clear insight into her own psyche and how bad off she must be. Only someone with incredible rage does this. She's worse than Billy and she's going downhill fast. I wonder if she has someone around her because her actions demonstrate clinical psychosis.
I know she's trying to hurt us with her words with her belittling and condescending attitude but at this point, it's not funny anymore. She's in serious need of help.
Who are you talking about?
DeleteSusan Harbison (you may not know her), she's a former poster on the blog that is very abusive to everyone around her. She was banned from here and told to leave. She refuses to respect that request and her rage is immense. It's far worse that Bill Windsor's to be frank.
DeleteWhich blog is she still ranting on?
DeleteOh really? I hadn't been there since I saw it was basically a shrine for Billie. I never banned her or blocked her from my site. I simply asked her to behave and she went from pretending to be nice to me, to what ever it is she does when she's alone but wants everyone to see.
DeleteYou're a very disturbed individual.
DeleteOh, Susan you finally found your way over here...I always thought you were a post behind...becuase of how stupid you are
DeleteBrannon, where is her blog? I need to be entertained.
Delete@The Trooth: http://william-m-windsor.freeforums.net/index.cgi
DeleteSeems Susan is in need of a life...and some help...sad to see someone devolve like this.
DeleteYou really are a self absorbed little sponge Suzie...enjoy your yourself, you really don't matter to me at all.
Can't we just delete her again?
The earth will be a happier place when God decides to delete her from the earth :)
Deletehttp://goanimate.com/videos/0KDFcIfAIGWI
ReplyDeleteThat's hysterical...well done.
ReplyDeletea new one for Janice and Bill http://goanimate.com/videos/0BUIX0dZL0Lo
ReplyDelete