Thursday, June 27, 2013

Billy Stops Paying Attention to His Latest Scam



Windsor gave this update last night on his personal facebook page:

BILL WINDSOR OF LAWLESS AMERICA ohh you mean that Bill Windsor IS TAKING A SHORT BREAK FROM FILMING you mean youtubing TO ATTEND TO PERSONAL MATTERS the only thing you ever do is attend to personal matters. IF YOU KNOW WHERE THIS PHOTO WAS TAKEN, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHERE HE IS. so you stole another picture and posted it?

I am not here that statement is fundamentally flawed on the most basic level, but it does look delightful. The only scenery I am seeing tends to be the four walls of a hotel room hopefully it will be redecorated soon with some iron bars.

The folks in the room next to me last night had a great time uhhhhh, did you send them a cease and desist?. I've never heard anything like it. I was blushing, I imagine *sigh*, no comment...but you know.

I did a lot of research on places to live there are lots of them out there huh, and I thought I had things narrowed down pretty well...but photos can be deceiving too bad you have never been able to go out and see all these places in person, like on vacation...oh wait. Little is easy that's especially true for stupid people.

I filed criminal charges against Curtis Butler of Springfield Missouri today.  and the crowd goes wiill...oh wait, no one cares any more


Thanks to his stalking obsession, Bill has been unable to properly respond to his vexatious filing in Missouri.  Yesterday, he tried to file and emergency motion for continuance.  He based this request on several parts:  1.  He says the court clerk is being mean and denying him subpoena powers to go out and discover what a ginger snap is.  2.  He has been out of town and unable to keep up with all the filings.  He claims he hasn't even seen Mark's answer.  3.  Brenda still hasn't been served, and Bill doesn't seem to know how to do it.  4.  Allie's attorney is being corrupt because he has only recently started to send everything to bill via email.  Bill says it can take up to two weeks to get his snail mail so its important that everyone take the extra effort to scan everything on to the computer and email it to him.

In light of this, I thought it would be nice to just go ahead and set the stage for a hearing between the judge and Bill at this point:

Bill:  Please allow me more time, I am out of town
Judge:  Why are you out of town? 
B:  Because I'm filming a movie
J:  Why are you filming a movie?
B:  Because judges are corrupt
J:  Why are judges corrupt?
B:  Because they ruled against me and labelled me a vexatious litigant
J:  Hmmm, ok lets back up a little, why did you have to file this lawsuit?
B:  Because Allie said mean things about me
J:  What?
B:  That my movie is fake
J:  Well when is this movie going to be out?
B:  I don't know, I need a rich person to fund it, someone to edit it, someone to write the story, someone to direct it and someone to produce it.
J:  So what do you have at this point?
B:  I have over 3,000 hours of random testimonies of people on youtube
J:  Ok, so why can't you get your mail?
B:  Because my wife divorced me and I had to leave
J:  Why did she do that?
B:  Because I wouldn't stop filming my movie
J:  So who are these 1000 John Does?
B:  I don't know, I was hoping you would help me find out
J:  Let me guess, they too said something negative about you "movie"?
B:  Exactly right.....so what is it gonna be Judge?

J:  this case is dismissed 





87 comments:

  1. Pie Man Zombie HunterJune 27, 2013 at 10:23 AM

    Ginger snap this was very funny thank you

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is the hilarious email I was referring to yesterday. Still laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Subpoena Requested
    Pro Se Plaintiff files a Second Request for 12 Non-Party Subpoenas per SCR 58.02. (1 faxed page)
    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR


    06/20/2013 Correspondence Sent
    In response to an e-mailed request for subpoenas to be provided by a FedEx courier, the Clerk reiterates (by e-mail) the Court's directive that no subpoenas for the purpose of taking deposition or for the production of documents are to be produced until all named defendants have been served.

    Denied! Again! Will Vexi Boy now list the court clerk and Judge as a Doe? DOH!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That "In response" bit might be the funniest line item on a court filing database I've ever seen.

      That entry, plus the "Emergency Motion for Extenstion of Time to Respond to Filings by Defendants" Windsor filed via fax on Monday, together suggest that Windsor's Missouri lawsuit is in serious trouble.

      Delete
    2. Pie Man Zombie HunterJune 27, 2013 at 11:30 AM

      who are the 12 people?

      Delete
    3. I can hear him now, stomping and screaming corruption, but how can he ignore that not all defendants (1000+) have been served. Not once, but twice he asks for it. Why would the court approve subpoenas for information on people who don't know they are being sued? They won't.

      http://www.courts.mo.gov/courts/ClerkHandbooksP2RulesOnly.nsf/C0C6FFA99DF4993F86256BA50057DCB8/91948E0FDB70020C86257973005C2464

      Delete
    4. PMZH, I am not sure, but I think he did say something about trying to subpoena google, BlogSpot, vimeo, youtube, facebook, etc.

      Delete
    5. 12 people? Maybe this is a way to call a jury despite being denied a jury trial...Not!

      Delete
    6. Ninja:
      I can hear him now, stomping and screaming corruption, but how can he ignore that not all defendants (1000+) have been served.

      The court isn't requiring Windsor to serve all of the John Does before this proceeds. It's just requiring him to serve all of the named defendants (that is, the ones that aren't Does) before letting him move on to discovery.

      It would be rather unfair (and pointless) to force a plaintiff to serve Does before getting discovery, given that in any case involving John Doe defendants, the plaintiff needs discovery to figure out who the Does are.

      Apparently Windsor hasn't managed to serve all of the people he named as defendants in his Complaint—which is pretty embarrassing. You're sort of, uh, supposed to figure out how you're going to get that done before you file your Complaint in the first place. If you don't know how to serve Brenda (or whomever), don't name her as a defendant to your lawsuit!

      Delete
    7. PMZH, I am not sure, but I think he did say something about trying to subpoena google, BlogSpot, vimeo, youtube, facebook, etc.

      Right; that would make sense, given that he's looking for John Does' identities. But those companies have plenty of lawyers on retainer, and I don't think they'll back down to the likes of Bill Windsor. (...Presuming he even manages to get the subpoenas signed and served in the first place.)

      Delete
    8. @Attorney I stand corrected. I don't know much about laws, but to me it seems strange that someone can request information on someone being sued, when they don't know they are being sued, and wouldn't have the opportunity to object. But I understand what you are saying.

      Delete
    9. So, Attorney, let me make sure I understand this. If Brenda cannot be served then he can't subpoena ANY of the john does? Is that right? Or am I misunderstanding.

      Delete
    10. I don't think he's trying to subpoena John Does. It's difficult to subpoena someone when you don't know who (or where) they are. The subpoenas appear to be directed at entities (Google, etc.) who, Windsor believes, know who one or more of the John Does are.

      The judge appears to be saying that he's not going to approve any subpoenas until and unless all of the named defendants have been served. I gather from other comments here that Brenda hasn't been served; quite possibly one or more other named defendants haven't been, either.

      I'm not familiar with any statute or court rule that provides that a plaintiff is required to serve all named defendants before conducting discovery. Possibly there is such a statute or rule in Missouri law—but more likely, I think, is that the judge is aware of Windsor's history as a vexatious litigant and is disinclined to cut him any procedural slack.

      Delete
    11. Judge R. is more than aware of Mr. Windsor's history.

      Delete
    12. Lol! That's too bad. Hey! I know where she is! I'll serve her myself for $1,000.

      Delete
    13. Well, I hope that Allie lady is practicing some fancy dances to do on the courthouse steps.

      Delete
    14. The person(s) that run the Vimeo and youtube acct's with some of the video's mocking Bill used a proxy IP to set up and load up the videos along with a fake email to open the accounts. There is nothing Bill could obtain from any of those accounts that would help him out but it's funny to watch him waste his time.

      Delete
  4. LOL, oh funny.... Im always reminded of this vid everytime somebody like Bitler or "other people" have a hissy fit...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV1-sI4EsY0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny how that butt hurt door on the internet swings both ways but some people seem to overlook the fact.

      Whatever. I like this one better.....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKUb-fKs_bw

      Delete
  5. This was actually funny. lol looks like the shark is going to get his denial soon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Reads like an SNL skit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. who are the 12 people?

    The Apostles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope..there's only four: Dave, Mickey, Peter, Mike.

      Delete
    2. Could be the monekeys and the dwarves.

      Delete
    3. LOL 12 Monkeys is a movie with Bruce Willis and Brad Pit. I assume that is the reference to the monkeys.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBNMEwNx9x4
      (Hum, interesting...)

      Delete
    4. Are the Twelve Monkeys part of the Apocalypse? I thought there were four horses...I'm so confused!

      Delete
    5. Bill has no horse but i envision him riding into the sunset on his ass

      Delete
    6. Ninja - Bingo! Takes place in a nuthouse, to boot!

      Delete
  8. http://www.break.com/video/bulletproof-vest-test-goes-wrong-695390

    Better watch this billy...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like the comments under his latest post on his personal facebook page with the fake stock photo of the beach:

    Lisa Snow Hagner I wanna come!
    17 hours ago · Like · 1

    Bill Windsor Lisa, you know you are invited!
    17 hours ago · Like

    Sharon Stephens How about me???

    ummm, sorry Sharon, not with that profile pic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reminds me of the image a few weeks ago with Billy and porno queen standing arm-in-arm, the fat cow with the big boobies beside the turkey-necked chick.

      Delete
    2. For the record, they both had big boobies..

      Delete
  10. Thanks Waltor. You got me in all kinds of trouble again.. I'm all upset about it. :!

    "He may also be responsible for creating fake identities for my deceased parents.  There are photos of my father on his death bed and photos of what are allegedly my mother’s skeleton.  There have been promises that they will be shown dead having sex.

    I will be in Missoula soon to interview all of you about this."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn it, Tiny...NBTDT said you were up to no good.

      Delete
    2. WTF is this guys fetish with death and sex. Dayum. And the only way I knew of a Walter page was because Windsor kept telling everyone about it. And the only one I've ever heard allege that dumbass corpse was supposed to be his mother, was Windsor. Neh, the guy is a drama queen. Plain and simple.

      Delete
    3. Its ok... As long as you come light the pie cannon for me... The cherry filling is getting a little moldy, but you probably like that.........

      Delete
    4. Pie Man Zombie HunterJune 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM

      it look like Mary Windsor and Walter Windsor profile are still on facebook


      plus the magic Bill one is there too

      Delete
    5. Nope. I know Boushie didn't do that one, didn't blame him for it.

      Delete
    6. Dang.... I thought I used enough troll spray here.... Let me mix it with some liquid Prozac....

      Delete
    7. Dang...you and your little groupie friends sure know how to twist stuff in your little pea brains. If y'all ain't lying y'all are just making it up as you go along.

      You were stalking Bill when you trolled your way onto this blog. Your groupie friends trolled their way here when the last hero failed them and they were looking for their next failure. Your it.

      Delete
    8. ^^ that's why nobody ever comes to your birthday parties. You're so angry. Poor, bitter thing! Maybe you should try yoga.

      Delete
    9. ^^^^^ THAT'S why nobody ever comes to your birthday parties you poor, bitter thing! Do you need a hug honey?

      Delete
  11. I mean..... Dang, that's to kinky fuckery even for me...

    ReplyDelete
  12. So what's he gonna do when when he gets to Missoula and everyone he walks up to, begging for an interview, says "who?" and walks off. Will he follow them down the sidewalk and spew out as many sentences about Tiny as he can before they turn and tell him to back off? Gimmee a damn break. Like Missoula is lining up to talk to the famous Billy about the evil Tiny. lololol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really! He has built all of this up in his head, (like everything else) and no one will probably even know who he is and why he's there.

      I see he had plenty of time though, to file criminal complaints (he says charges) against Curtis and Tiny in the past two days, all while whining to the court he needs an extension.

      I think he needs to either change his depends, or grow up, (I mean seriously the dude is an old man and acts like an infant) stop being such a big fat baby and move on. Go find a home somewhere and try to make the best of whatever life he has left. Instead, he chose to throw away his family and stalk, harass, and file charges for the rest of his life against anyone who expresses their first amendment rights.

      He can't be so asshurt about what he himself puts out for the world to read. Everyone has opinions and will keep talking about him as long as he gives them things to criticize, critique, mock, laugh at or whatever. This is absolutely ridiculous what he is spinning this all into, for the sole purpose of drama.

      I re-read his Windsor VS the USA, that right there...Get effin over it dude! You just don't get it!

      Delete
    2. Wow. I didn't find his pleadings, just the response from the judges. They smacked him down for doing exactly what he's doing now.

      Delete
    3. Well two days after he says he filed charges on me I am still walking free. Where is Bill? WHO CARES!

      Delete
  13. Only ten days to piemagedon!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pie Man Zombie hunterJune 27, 2013 at 7:11 PM

      that means he will be there in 3 days

      Delete
    2. Pie Man Zombie hunterJune 27, 2013 at 7:36 PM

      I was on his blog for Jan about you and he has Lori Calli as a witness but in Dec 2012 he called her a stalker ...

      and in Allie Lawsuit did he blame Walter on her?

      Delete
    3. Good, if he has Lori Callies as a witness. Because the dummy sent me all her emails to him and they , um, let's say they don't make her very credible. lol.

      And yes, he is suing me for damages for making the damn Walter page which I had nothing to do with. And everything else anyone has ever said or done to him, including shit that's in his head.

      Delete
    4. Good!! They should stay up!

      Well Ms A, there's your proof of that. He can't blame two people.

      Delete
    5. He's fishing. Over really stupid stuff, too.

      Delete
    6. Pie Man Zombie HunterJune 27, 2013 at 9:12 PM

      What funny about the Walter profile, is that he blame Allie first because Walter told him go take his Meds.... And he yelled see it Allie because she is the only one that knew Bill was taken meds for being Paranoid

      Delete
    7. Do you know I got a lot of Hate messages from his follower but one message me asking if I was Bill?

      Delete
    8. Lol yeah the rest of us just assumed it. Allie...Why did you allow all those people to say or do those things to Bill and why did you put all that shit into his head? LMFAO
      *~*Redd*~*

      Delete
  14. I still want a picture of the Judges face when he reads off Anita P Ness as one of the (Dil) Dohs.
    *~*Redd*~*

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who wrote his witness list, Bart Simpson?

      Delete
  15. Do you think BW masturbates to Alice on The Brady Bunch?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Allie how is it bill is suing dor damages agaist yourself for the walter page if he on the email to the police states that sean boushie is behind it? Basically all he has is shown is that he does not know who made it but likes to blame anyone about it. For all we know bill could have created it himself.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Because he's a pissed off, narcissistic old man. He is suing everyone for everything and has no intention on anything but finding out who calls him nanes. His lawsuit is nothing more than a fishing expedition, and he gets the angry perk of costing people time, stress, and money. He knows I didn't do any of that shit. And he doesn't care, as long as he punishes me along the way in his expedition for embarrassing him. That's how.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oooh, good name for him, Sluggo.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ruhh roh... Look out Brenda..

    06/28/2013

    Alias Summons Issued

    Document ID: 13-SMCC-247, for WILLIAMSON, BRENDA A. Summons issued to Jackson County Civil Process with service fee taken out of the deposit.

    06/27/2013

    Request for Alias Summons
    Plaintiff files Request for an Alias Summons for Defendant Brenda A Williamson.





    Filed By: WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is Brenda in Mississippi? Did Billy clear this with the federal district court? If not, he may be in violation of Thrash's order.

      Delete
    2. It's no big deal. It's simply a second try because she wasn't served the first time. He needs no permission other than the local judge issuance, which he got. It's just like a pluries summons. In Missouri, an alias service can be done at the gas station, at a stop sign, the hair salon, whatever, rather than simply at your residence is all. All he's doing is re-trying to serve Brenda because he failed the first time. Pretty common, I'd think.

      Delete
    3. So...Thrash's order is meaningless then? Why do we pay all these federal judges when their orders are (apparently) about as important as a Bazooka comic?

      Delete
    4. Check mail Sluggo

      Delete
    5. So...Thrash's order is meaningless then?

      No. Thrash's order requires federal-court permission for Windsor to file a lawsuit. He got that permission to file suit in Missouri. (After, we've been told, he tried and failed to get federal-court permission in Georgia.)

      Attempting to serve Ms. Williamson with his Missouri complaint is not filing a lawsuit. It's attempting to serve process. As a result, it doesn't implicate Thrash's order.

      Delete
    6. But he, and his suits are just as iegit as a Bazooka comic.....

      Delete
    7. @Attorney,

      Thanks for your reply; I asked if Brenda was in Mississippi in a previous post. I now know she's not--she's in Missouri, so Billy is covered, but what if Billy tries to file in MS. against EHH, is he still covered by the permission given by the federal district court in MO? I don't understand. (I'm just a caveman...your world frightens and confuses me).

      Delete
    8. Attorney can correct me here, but I think if he names EHH in THIS lawsuit then no, he will not need permission. All he needs is to name her as one of the john doe's, get her served, and go on with it. Which is why I think he added all those Doe's. To just keep going for years and adding people as he discovers them, without filing again for permission. Of course, I'd think EHH could then argue personal jurisdiction. @ Attorney?

      Delete
    9. Yes, I think that's basically correct, Ms. Overstreet. I think there's very little chance Windsor can keep the lawsuit against you and your fellow defendants "going for years"—if he doesn't look out, it might not even survive until August—but the whole point of suing John Does is to fill those spaces in with real names as the plaintiff learns more. And filling in a John Doe with a real name doesn't constitute filing a new lawsuit.

      As you suggest, a new lawsuit would require new federal-court permission, but new(ly named) defendants in this lawsuit wouldn't.

      Delete
    10. So Brenda is in Jackson County? Hmmmmmm......that's strange. I could've sworn she was in Bates County. But...what do I know. Go getter boob!
      Beep beep!

      Delete
  20. But he, and his suits are just as iegit as a Bazooka comic.....

    True dat....

    ReplyDelete