Thursday, February 19, 2015

Idaho is the End of the Line for Bill Windsor


First hand reports when Bill was arrested in Ellis County say that Bill Windsor sobbed and screamed uncontrollably as he was put into custody.  Well, look at those eyes, he can't fight back the tears...the sorrow.  Those eyes tell the whole story, its over and he knows it.  On the bright side, Bill gets to finally get back into a courtroom.  Of course the downside is its a criminal court and none of his games work there.  Windsor is finally going to learn something he has spent his whole life running from....the rules really do apply to him.

Something tells me Jennie Morton wont be picking up his vehicle for him.

Who will he use as his phone a friend?  He just disinherited Ryan.

Leave it to Bill to be so vain that he can't change his appearance, even as a fugitive.

Will information on Bill's laptop incriminate "Angel" and "Butch".....others?

Windsor really picked the wrong guy to mess with in Patrick Wilson.

Now that he is in custody and can be legally served, how many of his victims are lined up strike back in civil court?

Just how many felony counts will Montana slap him with, hundreds?

Which state will he be extradited to first?

Will Bill depose himself at his own trial?

Load up on your popcorn, this is gonna get interesting...and hilarious.

210 comments:

  1. Silence descends on BILL WORLD. NO more Bill DAILY...
    Who will visit him will he get a court appointed attorney, or fork over hard $$ to a pvt Mont counsel who is a grad of Mont Law school, who he bashed, endlessly as a law school that caters to dopes, the lowest 1 % of law grads, according to BILL..
    Will Race Horse Haines rush up to MIssoula to pull Bill's bacon out of the fire ?
    Bill is going to learn the hard way, where the rubber meets the road: AMERICAN JUSTICE, and his KEYBOARD CAPERS.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "It was old pro se me against The Ellis County District Attorney Patrick Wilson. ... He’s probably typical of many small county district attorneys – not that sharp."

    Care to revise that statement, Windsor?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, Windsor is most definitely his own worst enemy. His online obsession will more than likely bite him in the ass. How many people has he defamed, and called criminals? This reality he dodged while he created his fantasy will certainly clash in the Criminal Courts. People don't tend to live by semantics, and surely he won't be able to play those same games there.

      Delete
    2. Ninja, you're absolutely right. Windsor won't be able to pull his "I'm just a sweet Southern grandpa" routine in criminal court. His own online rants and veiled threats; history of nasty litigation; and taunting prove he is not and never has been a sweet old Southern man. Going on the run and defaming/taunting everyone in sight just added gasoline to the fire. Windsor can't deny or hide that he did those things. He's in deep trouble.

      Delete
    3. I really hope, all those new domains he bought since his release, for the DA's, the Judges, and the other court personnel, with all his slanderous commentary, will set the path for any new Judges, DA's or court staff that comes in contact with Windsor. It's his history!!

      He'll surely try the "You've got the wrong William M Windsor." Then possibly, "I didn't see any warrant." Followed by "They didn't read me my rights." With the standard "I need computer access" and the plethora of "Motions to Quash, Habeas Corpus, and Umpteen Writs."

      Since he loves to document his terroristic strategy, it's all right there, waiting for him to abuse the system further. At least now, they can see it, and get some kind of preemptive injunction to stop his vexatious frivilousness or something to stop this nonsense.

      Delete
    4. We're gonna need a Toybota load of popcorn & beer!
      Daaaaaayum!

      I'm so tickled, I may not sleep!

      Delete
    5. I will pass on the beer. But I would settle for a tub of popcorn and a six pack of Dr. Pepper

      Delete
    6. pffft pass on beer wtf is wrong with you on a night like this, oh well I'll take the beer

      Delete
    7. Ice mine til tomorrow!
      Yay!
      #Day53 was a happy day :)

      Delete
    8. Imperial Lord Brannon, I am at work and still have to drive home. So it's dr. Pepper for me till I get home where my Jim Beam sits in the fridge.

      Delete
    9. haha ah I see, ok then that makes it a little more understandable

      Delete
  3. Well, apparently some investigators for the D A were super sharp.... ?
    But, Bill will get his day in Court, and can demand a jury trial, and seek to prove he is really CLARENCE DARROW-- BILL..
    Time will tell, will get get BOND....Ooooooops, he proved he was a flight risk...
    Ooooops, STRIKE ONE.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was out for dinner. What happened to his invisibility? He should sue that chick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her and nash are now Joeys

      Delete
    2. I like Mr Nash. He tried, durn it.

      Delete
    3. "I am not Bill Windsor and I have a new fake ID to prove it!"

      Delete
    4. Wow! He looks so different! Almost invisible. I had to squint to see him in the mugshot - -

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    5. Susan thinks that's Casey Hargrove's mugshot from his "arrest in Midlothian".

      Delete
  5. The Infamous Jay HoskinsFebruary 19, 2015 at 8:29 PM

    He was arrested by Meridian Police. 2 Counts


    MADISON, SD



    Age: 66
    Date: Thursday, 2/19
    Time: 3:12 PM
    Status: I


    Meridian Police F Fugitive To Idaho I19-4514(F) 2/20
    Meridian Police F Fugitive To Idaho I19-4514(F) 2/20

    Meridian is the 3rd-largest city in the state of Idaho. As of 2010, the population of Meridian was 75,092, and a 2014 estimate placed the population at approximately 85,000

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are there any details as to why? Were they following him? Did he do something to draw attention to himself? Do they know where he was staying, and who was helping him hide? So many questions...would love to know the facts behind this wonderful arrest!!

      Delete
    2. The Infamous Jay HoskinsFebruary 19, 2015 at 10:07 PM

      I have requested a copy of the police report, and since he has put up a website with my name and image, I will see if our local DA will take a case of online impersonation.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, so have numerous of 'us'.

      Delete
    4. there are enough sites in peoples various names there could be a class action suit ROFL

      Yep, Ninja , he is and always has been his own worst enemy. I wonder if he was arrested in his motel room, Hiding behind the stacks of Billshitt? How angry will he get if they take his boxes of papers away? LMAO You are a fugitive from multiple states now Bill, no paper for you!!! No laptop either, it's now evidence

      Delete
  6. Recall, he blabbered he was near the RIVER:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=Meridian+hotel+near+river+Idaho+map&sa=X&espv=2&biw=1296&bih=986&tbm=isch&imgil=ajIYr1z9dClbSM%253A%253
    His computer beam sends out his triangulated location, as Joes must know, on its cyber trackers.. How hard was it for Wilson's blood hound investigators to figure how the end of the trail for BILL. His computer addiction was like some;
    HERE I AM COME GET ME...
    And they DID. AND he proved he was a flight risk, taunting ALL, in BLUE..
    He will be in his orange jump suit for a long long time


    ReplyDelete
  7. It's so sad...he missed the finale of 2½ Men...oh wait, he may get to have his own version of that show tonight. Poor Billy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It will be interesting to see how the spoiled, narcissistic blabber mouth fairs over time not getting his self indulgent way EVER except to binge on candy from the commissary.

    ReplyDelete
  9. it is about a 7 hour drive from the Boise area to Missoula, mostly through National Federal Forest lands, a route N- NE. He can be booked tomorrow, (n Montana) without bond, of course do to his proven very high flight risk.
    Essentially, Bill is off the RADAR, of WWW/ RAVE WORLD.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So if he is transferred to Missoula tomorrow & booked without bond, he will be in sitting in the Missoula jail until he is charged & arraigned before a judge in Missoula, correct?
      I'm wondering at what point he will have to face the charges in Ellis County as well. I assume after he is charged & arraigned in Missoula .. Wow, the fat, old dude is so F-ked .. too bad, so sad ..

      Delete
    2. I'm not sure right now, we might have to play the extradition game all over again here.

      Delete
    3. I bet DA Wilson is willing to be patient and allow Montana to do what they need to, he's already within 5-7 hours drive to Missoula, depending on weather and road conditions. Tomorrow is Friday, he's likely to be a guest of Idaho for awhile.
      This is kinda like his Lawless Tour #4!

      I hope someone updates his Dear Diary for End of Day53!

      Delete
    4. Snooze is trying to pry the crow out of her mouth right now. Or perhaps she wen to jail with him, I mean she was pretty far up his arse...

      Delete
    5. She's oiling the hinges on her crypt with butthurt ointment. Her another coupla hours. It's still early for her.
      Just think of all the devices and the information on those!

      I sincerely hope the Boushies are resting happily tonight, maybe even #DELIGHTED

      Delete
    6. *Give her another couple of hours
      ***Giddy & autocorrect mishaps! (my apologies)

      Delete
    7. SFW : I agree ... and I think Montana really wants to get his fat ass in their custody, maybe even to the point of driving to pick him up from Idaho. He is not listed as a inmate of the jail in Idaho, yet ...maybe he's getting transferred to Montana tonight ( they do like to transport fugitives late at night) lol or maybe it's wishful thinking on my part ... I do wonder though, if investigators Jeff Ward and Bob Allwardt are in Idaho@ this moment and if they were today when the fugitive was captured.

      Delete
    8. awww seems Angel has stopped by, Cheers!!! So are you gonna update his website later on or what? The lemmings need re assurance that it's not true

      Delete
    9. Just last week Snoozan posted here that LE would "find" Windsor but they would never "catch" him as if there were some practical distinction between LE finding and catching Windsor. Well, Windsor was found and caught. Period. Snooze was wrong, but all you'll get from her is more BS and a MAD COW (lap) dance.

      Delete
    10. Check out my last two entries here:
      billisalittlekid.blogspot.com
      Emperor Brannon let me know what you think.

      Delete
    11. Aw Crap, Angel/Crypt Keeper/ Snooze/Flooze/ Sharon V Galloway/Susan/Gary ...etc is going to be lurking over here all butthurt, bitter & befuddled 24/7 now that her fatass fugitive crush is in Jail.

      Delete
    12. K CW I will check it out and I would like to go if I know when it is, and within a month or so to where I can get off

      Delete
  10. Thank goodness that while locked up in Ellis County he already found his sleep number and how fast the wi-fi is in jail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I phone my 85-year-old mother she always asks, "How's Winston?"

      I can't wait to tell her, "He's smoked!"

      Delete
    2. @WindsorWhisperer?
      GIGGLE! Good one! #SleepNumber! Snicker!

      ~waving wildly~

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    3. High hooves to you, dainty one in white!! Glad ya liked that one.

      Delete
  11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlk36vgygh4

    ReplyDelete
  12. Now Renee, you should go get your DA and all the top gov. officials that use your website to finish up the job of getting your website taken down, since mine have helped in making sure he is captured, that you seemed to somewhat bash and think not enough was being done

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Renee owes Mr.Wilson a apology after that spew last night about him ... of course this is just my humble opinion ..I truly believe if it were not for DA Wilson, the fugitive would not be in jail, tonight ... maybe, not ever.

      Delete
    2. @12:08 Nobody hates or even dislikes Renee ... she was just wrong about Wilson, just like the fat ass fugitive was.

      Delete
    3. ummm ya @12:08 that wasn't hate towards Renee, just advice

      Delete
    4. I'm guessing 12:08 is the very angry crypt keeper.

      Delete
    5. yep, you can count on it, she is giddy she can post without Windsor seeing, How about you tell the truth about Bill now Susan. Tell us how you really feel about the old fool and the arrest today. LMAO We really care...and thanks for posting about your mass mailing plans...good luck with that....

      Delete
    6. Uh, ditto, no one hates Renee! Duh.
      See, this is how it is supposed to work. A person comments their view or opinion, another counters with theirs. It might get heated, disagreements do happen, but normal people agree to disagree & move on.

      You? Crypt Keeping BillSchit Ass Licker? We do all agree you're goofy & just unlikable. Hope that helps, by the way! Your Willy had another rough day! When your creak out about dark? You can read up! The rest of us? We're going out for beers! #ESAFBH

      Delete
  13. "Lynn Maris-- Bill will be better if we keep the publicity and public interest strong"
    HAHAHAHAHA he's toast!! HE couldn't even get the public interest or publicity going strong and the lemmings all 5 of them think they can? This is rich!

    Lynn also thinks that the letters to the Governors will be addressed now. HAHAHA yeah, that's how it works Lynn! NOT!! It's time for real Justice--something you people don't like!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And, Lynn's reply to Nash's comment ...

      "Lynn Maris - Another Lawless attempted infiltrator... Bill Windsor is an American hero, I fully support Lawless! Going nowhere? Bill is defending our freedoms, and his documentary will expose rampant corruption and abuses of power. Those who filmed testimonies deserve to be heard."

      Delete
    2. HAHAHAHA standard lemming denial. Yeah, so, since Lord and Savior Windsour is not in jail, and most likely will be for several years, when's that documentary coming out again? LMAO It's shattered clips on youtube. Whatever, they'll keep living in denial, even years down the road, they'll say...but the movie is coming out.

      Good for Nash. Getting away from Blustery Billshit and breathing in fresh air will do wonders anyone!

      Delete
    3. ***now*** in jail

      Delete
    4. HA HA HA ... Loony Lynn really is dumber than a stump!

      "Lynn Maris - The joeys are criminals. If they think Bill being arrested will stop us, they are also delusional."

      Delete
    5. someone should tell her her movie is out,,,go look on you tube...that's as good as it gets and she could have done it herself.

      And Lynn dear, Bill is the one in jail charged with FELONIES.

      Delete
    6. Wow, Loony Lynn is busy,busy tonight with her psycho babble ... LOL !!!
      Lynn Maris - ‎Lawless America

      " Breaking News: Documentary filmmaker Bill Windsor, arrested in Idaho, under bogus charges, gang stalking psychos celebrate " .....

      Delete
  14. THIS IS NOT GOING TO STOP US.... TRUTH AND JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please go tell Flordeliza to keep praying for this sack of shit...it's helped him so far

      Delete
    2. I just hope she keeps misspelling he words of prayer while her caps lock is on

      Delete
    3. From what I can tell the blog claims no allegiance or friendship with Curtis Butler, you can have him. He'd make the perfect Nobody.

      Delete
  15. Lynn Maris So Bill gets to see a judge.. or maybe his other complaints will be heard, the ones he already sent ou

    Don't you worry Lynn, I am sure all the complaints he has made will catch up to him in court.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So who all is planning road trips to Montana for the #trialofthecentury version 2? If someone does not mind me supplying half the gas monies I would love a lift.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I called it first!

    "Spamanon February 17, 2015 at 6:46 AM
    BW: "I was denied access to my laptop and the internet for 53 days of torturous interference.

    DA: "Your Honor, may the prosecution present these exhibits of what he needed them for during the 53 days he was a fugitive?"

    ReplyDelete
  18. "If they think Bill being arrested will stop us, they are also delusional."

    It's already stopped you. Bill's FB page will stagnate. If he'd turned himself in when he had the chance, he could have possibly gotten bond (with a competent attorney). He could have kept that and a few other pages going. Now? Nope. No bond for someone who already abused it.

    Lawless America is done. Over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon@1:34 - Are jail & prison inmates even allowed to have social media (Facebook -Twitter ) accounts?
      I don't believe that they are.
      His Facebook page will probably be deactivated by a court/LE order before it becomes stagnate, and his LA.com & dot,com hate sties will be removed after they are used as evidence agaisnt him ... HaHaHa Yup, Stick a Fork in Lawless America, it is Done !!!

      Delete
    2. Delusional is not recognizing that Lawless America hadn't done a damn thing as a group since DC other than enable a stalker.

      Delete
    3. Why be anonymous are you scared of something? all this anonymous comments What a bunch of Losers

      Delete
    4. ^^^^ Shouldn't you be busy getting fitted for the gown you're going to wear on the red carpet at the great Lawless America movie premiere?

      Delete
    5. So, I guess your legal name is Lawless Supporter?

      Delete
    6. I'm NOT anonymous.
      And I'm not scared. Never once was it ME running. All the drive bys Windsor made past my home? It was Windsor RUNNING like his ass was on fire to get away, using shaky NASCAR skills, putting numerous others on streets & highways in danger.
      At hearings in Ellis County? Never once did I run from courtroom nor did I run to hide in bathroom.
      I'm scared of nothing you, #LawlessSupporter, or your lying, scummy pontificating leader, William Michael Windsor ( Winkopp) has to spew.
      Maybe you & I can meet, eye to eye, in Montana? We can sit together in the gallery of that courtroom and observe the proceedings for your #InFear leader?

      #LawlessSupporter? Just so you know? I could give two flying rats' fuzzy asses IF you or any of Windsor's supporters make umpteen 'movies'. Y'all can film to exceed the #Twilight series. You can also upload it all to YouTube, Vimeo, Vine, etc from now until all eternity. Try to get your spewage straight.
      It's still sad to me how Windsor did all of y'all that supported him. He wouldn't do one thing for any of you, not one tangible thing, but felt compelled to bond out of jail complete strangers. He ditched y'all to persue any & everything else.
      But, hey, he ditched his own family first, why would he do y'all any different?

      Don't lump me into your #anonymous scared blather and don't be a Windsor, fact up before you R U N off at your keypad.


      KellieMcDougald

      Delete
    7. I'm not anonymous either. Those that are? Do it so crackpots like Windsor don't stalk them too. Wanna support fair laws and fair courts? Jump. Wanna support a lying conmen who get their rocks off harming people's lives? Kick sand. See, there's a difference between "gang" and victims gathering together. If you support Windbag, you went to him for a reason and you should know that.

      Allie Overstreet

      Delete
    8. I am the TROOTH damnit!!
      Brenda Williamson
      Noah Williamson

      Delete
    9. I've used my real name since all this began - it's Stacy Emerson, and I published an exposé on Windsor on my website - www.LifeInPierceCounty.com.

      Whomever you are, Lawless Supporter, you shouldn't complain about people posting anonymously when you yourself do the same thing.

      Delete
    10. I'm anonymous because my ex-husband's attorney has done a brilliant job of stalking me for years. Everything I say online is used against me at some custody court hearing. I never quite trusted Bill. I hoped he was right. I did. But just in case, I never did use my real name with him. I'd been bit you see and I saw how it could turn. I have been stalked outside my home, pictures taken of me at funerals. All that. I never did do a video with him either. I was positive it would be seen and used against me. And then all of this happened. I was really hoping I was wrong about Windsor. I should have known. Now if only my stalker can go to jail....well, that would make my day.

      Delete
    11. I am the TROOTH damnit!!
      Brenda Williamson
      Noah Williamson

      Delete
    12. I am the TROOTH damnit!!
      Brenda Williamson
      Noah Williamson

      Delete
    13. @Anon2:27? I hope he does too!!
      You were very wary & wise! Excellent for you!
      I'm very proud of you!

      Delete
  19. HA!
    -----
    Anonymous January 29, 2015 at 10:12 AM

    That highway picture is Northern Idaho. Either that or the Bob Marshall area of Montana.

    Not that Windsor took that picture, or if he did, when.
    ----

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, there are several photos on his lawless america page that still have the meta data on them showing when they were taken by his cannon camera. He posted all of the weeks after they were actually taken, but they probably show an accurate path of where he was and when. Most of them he even conveniently named with verifiable locations. At least one was taken in Montana where he says he never was. (well sometimes says. He's said he went there, he planned to go there, he just took photos across the border. . . several versions of that story)

      Delete
  20. "Don't you idiots realize that 90% of what has been posted over the past 4 months has been either bait or misdirection for you? "

    That worked real well, Snooze.

    Besides that, you're saying you've known where Bill was this entire while? That's interesting. Very. Not saying LE will bother with you now that Bill,

    1. Is incarcerated,

    2. In fact hasn't killed anyone during his time in hiding (that we know of)

    But you did have a legal (the criminal type) obligation to tell LE of Windsor's whereabouts. Guess we'll see what's up with that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't matter if you said it. Did you know where he was? If no, you're full of shit. If yes, you're guilty of a crime.

      Delete
    2. Where I live "full of shit" means you are lying.
      So if I say no, I am lying, thus the truth is a yes, which means I'm guilty.
      If I say yes, I am guilty.

      Maybe you should offer your services as an interrogator!

      Delete
  21. Be sure to tell your fellow inmates how poor the University of Montana's collegiate rankings are, Mr. Windsor. I'm sure they'll be riveted.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "the game will proceed to the next challenge"

    No one here is the tiniest bit interested in this game you play with yourself. We never have been. You're a just a troll to us, and a goddamn boring one.

    ReplyDelete
  23. What does GENII even mean? You appear mentally unwell. Surely you know that. Bill was and is entertaining. You're not. You're just annoying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely I know I appear mentally unwell?

      You mean like people that inhabit a hate sight for YEARS for the sole purpose of blatantly harassing an individual? People that regularly invent facts about the target and then treat those facts as established truth? I could go on but I don't feel like it.

      Appearances can be deceiving . Surely you know that!

      Delete
    2. @Snooze2:44 - What's a Hate "Sight" ?

      Delete
    3. Oh okay genii: supernatural creatures in Arab folklore and Islamic teachings

      Yupper. That explains everything. You're dazed, alcoholic and a bit schizophrenic. Thanks.

      Delete
  24. We won the game, Schmooze! It's over. Bill is headed to jail. We aren't. Game over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Sharon, just saw the video CD Witherspoon made about your other boyfriend. Seems your "Court Watch/Occupy The Law" is having some kind of turf war with Occupy Baltimore. You just don't play well with anyone do you?
      http://www.baltimorespectator.com/2013/07/you-are-disgusting-creep-cd-witherspoon.html

      Delete
  25. His name is not on today's hearing schedule in Ada Co.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awww
      That can't be good, huh?
      Poor Mr Windsor. I hope he had his Bible on him & was ready, as he preached in his article earlier in tour #3. His Bible will have all his needed information, scribbled along side of pages.

      Delete
    2. He has been given a LE# & is now a Official Inmate of the Ada County jail ... LOL

      WINDSOR WILLIAM MICHAEL Age: 66
      LE Number: 1061367
      Cell: 1M
      Arresting Agency: Meridian Police
      F Fugitive To Idaho
      F Fugitive To Idaho

      Delete
  26. All the anonymous it might be the same person writting all BS... GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BILLLLLL


    LAWLESS AMERICA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NewsFlash! #LawlessSupporter? Look above, at very top of page. Go Bill? Is gone. To jail. Again.

      You're a mighty bright bulb on that string.

      Delete
    2. Good morning Lawless Supporter. How are you?

      Delete
    3. She's miffed, GS. No Festive Friday in her day:/
      Tammy Stroud, @LawlessSupporter is tore up that Bill didn't get to keep running.
      It's ok, Tammy, you can write to Bill, maybe begin #AGoFundMe or a #Petition.org....

      Kinda cold up your way this morning, huh? Brrrrrrr! It's going to be a gorgeous 70+degree sunny day, here in Kemp, Texas! Try to suck it up, Gurl. Life does goes on while Windsor is incarcerated.

      Delete
    4. Yeah - go Bill. Straight to jail - do not pass GO, do not collect $200. Windsor is NOT wanted for exercising First Amendment rights. He's wanted for repeatedly violating a legal restraining order in Montana. (Which he knew about - he appealed the thing twice, and lost both appeals. How could he appeal something he claims he didn't know about?) Apparently, Windsor thought if he wasn't in Montana, he could get away with violating that order. WRONG.

      He's also wanted for jumping bond in Texas. He promised the judge he would turn himself in to Montana authorities, get that done, then return to Texas to deal with them (even paid $100,000 as security for that promise). Then, he decided that since he didn't like the situation, it didn't apply to him and he'd go into hiding. And he started slinging s**t at everyone in sight for daring to hold him accountable.

      You see the pattern here, Supporter? Windsor believes if he doesn't like decisions or rules, they don't apply to him. And if anyone disagrees or tries to hold him accountable, he screams "corruption" and begins an obsessive search for ANY information that would discredit that person or court. Classic narcissistic behavior - and wrong again. Rules and laws DO apply to Windsor - and he's going to find that out real fast.

      I'm sorry for what many of his supporters have been through. But Windsor is not anyone's savior and never has been. He was and is not out to expose corruption; he just doesn't like being held responsible for anything he does. And that movie he's been promising for nearly three years? It will never be made. Windsor himself admitted the movie was just a way to get people to support his anti-government activities.

      Delete
    5. Yup, @LawlessSupporter! Tammy? We're all the same. We're ALL Mike, just ask your fellow Lawless Supporter, Nancy Evans Figat. She figured that out over a year ago. Duh, you're way behind.

      Giggle!

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    6. actually the $100,000 was a PR bond....kinda like a promissory note. Bottom line....he ummmm,.....owes Ellis County that, and I think they might be in the mood to collect

      Delete
    7. Ginger Snap - You're right. I stand corrected.

      Delete
  27. No morning update?

    How's a guy supposed to have a decent bowel movement?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Will the Meridian PD be holding a press conference? Oh Please ohhhhh Please please please? Maybe the arresting officers can write a tell all. Everyone wants to hear every single detail

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably involved the vice squad.

      Delete
    2. This'll make "World's Dumbest Criminals" for sure.

      We'll all be pointing it out to our children...

      Delete
  29. Here! Let's dedicate this to the #NotSoFugitive!

    http://youtu.be/2g5Hz17C4is

    ReplyDelete
  30. What does the future hold for the disenfranchised lemming?

    Move out of your parent's basement? Get a job? Get a life?

    Who gets custody of Mary Deneen's nonsensical tick posts ad nauseum?

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bill has his petitions ready, right, his secret motions, his Plan A, his stacks of paper to address all. Only thing is the world may not hear what has happened to Bill for several months, before he is formally charged, in a long indictment in Montana.
    Bill is in the storage/ freezer and he is going no where for a long long long time.
    His beaming Bill v _____, is off line.
    His State of Montana v BILL, will drag on for years,
    Where are all his supporters, now. THE one guy over in Israel, is he going to fire up the Zernik beam machine ?
    Bill is off the WWW radar for a long time.
    In a few months there might be a post or two on the WWW, that goes what ever happened to that Bill guy. He became the world's biggest NOBODY, soon All, will never have heard of what was his Name... NOBODY.
    SAD, he wanted to be somebody, a player, but he could not keep his fingers off the keyboards. Now will he plead, insanity. The Joeys drove him nuts.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I have some questions for "Lawless Supporter."
    You and your fellow Lawless supporters have been at this "Exposing Corruption" gig for years, how's that going for you? Are you all in the exact same spot? Yes, you are. Why is that?

    Quote "Lynn Maris-- The joeys are criminals. If they think Bill being arrested will stop us, they are also delusional."

    Can any of you back that up with evidence? Have any one of us been charged? Or are you simply believing what Windsor told you. No, you can't back that up. Yes, you are lemmings. Same as you still believing he's going to do anything to help you.

    You all made little video clips and signed contracts, giving him the exclusive rights. (whether those contracts are legal or not remains to be seen) What exactly are you all going to do with them? Windsor might sue you for using them in any fashion he doesn't agree with.

    Ok, so really, what is the issue here? Is it your ego that blinds you? Is it embarrassing to know, that you were taken for a ride by a Narcissist? His sole goal was to be the President of Windsor World. Wake up!! Just the other day, he wrote another article asking how to get millions on board. Same mantra he said from day one. It's not about the "Movie." It's about getting William M Windsor's name out in the public. That's it. While you are being distracted with false illusions of "Corruption" your "Leader" has broken laws left and right. You won't see it, because he brainwashed you into believing 'Everyone is Corrupt.'

    Do you even know that the DC debacle was a scam? He didn't properly get permission for it. He didn't follow proper procedure in inviting all the Senators/Congress to attend. No, that was all a big show. Even Dotty can back that up (that is, if she isn't too chicken shit) because she is the one who FAXED letters a few days before the event. NOT PROPER NOTIFICATION. You all wasted your time and money, to go sit in a room full of other people who were being played. The "CD/DVD" he left? Yeah, they weren't allowed to even view them. He had you all traipsing all over, delivering things that would never be seen. Windsor is the master of Games. Just ask Susan aka Sharon V Galloway, the woman who was with him at the GRIP formation who went by Scout. She's all about playing games with the Government. Manipulating laws to suit their needs. (Ironic hu? Many of you feel you lost your cases due to shady people manipulating the courts? Yeah, right there--they--those Vexatious types, the greedy assholes who don't care who they screw over--those ARE the people you are fighting against, yet you are supporting them in Lawless America.)

    Cut your losses, move along. You were played. No shame, find someone else who actually IS doing something to help people. Research their history, don't blindly follow. Be smarter this time. Stop making yourselves easy targets!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bravo Ninja, I <3 you, and totally agree with your post!

      Delete
  33. Okay, time for a long-winded comment:

    I actually think the presence of “Lawless Supporter” is a good sign—it provides an opportunity for a somewhat calmer and more open discussion of the pros and cons of Lawless America and related endeavors than has been possible with Windsor still at large. (Also, c’mon, LS—can’t we have a shout-out for us pseudonymous commenters, including you and me? Can I get a “what, what”?)

    I have long thought that the basic concept behind the Lawless America video series (or movie, or TV show, or whatever form it might take) was sound; a serious documentary project that examined controversial judicial proceedings—though, crucially, it would have to be done to very high journalistic standards—would be fantastic. It’s just that, from the perspectives of many of us, that has never been what Lawless America has constituted.

    I would be willing to bet plenty that some portion of the people Windsor filmed have suffered honest-to-goodness injustices at the hands of the American judicial system. The phenomenon of (1) judicial corruption very much does exist; crucially, though, as far as I (as a practitioner) can tell it’s far less common than (2) judicial doing-a-lousy-job-for-non-corrupt-reasons, which is itself less common than (3) losing litigants believing that they wuz robbed, when in fact the decision that went against them was the correct outcome under the law. I’ve been litigating for a while, and I’ve seen more than a few cases of (2), but no out-and-out (1) corruption. Then, law is complicated and confusing, and people (including lawyers!) do not always analyze facts, rules, and arguments as rationally and dispassionately as we should, so (3) is always a pitfall any time one loses a lawsuit.

    So I have overwhelming sympathy for a large proportion of the people who gave on-camera “testimony” to Windsor. Some fraction of them, it seems clear to me, were in fact done wrong by courts; others weren’t but labor under the understandable and (I think) forgivable misconception that they were. (For this reason, I don’t like calling LA members “lemmings,” though I do understand the frustration that goes into that moniker.)

    The more tendentious question is what effect any/all of this has on one’s perspective on Bill Windsor. Some commenters on this blog (generally the ones that had some past affiliation with LA, though various Anonymous commenters here have claimed to know Windsor in other contexts) have asserted that they have seen Windsor say and do seriously dishonest things. I haven’t—I have no first-hand experience with the man—but I have read a lot of what he has written, including a large number of his court filings. In my considered opinion, the vast majority of legal positions he has taken are clearly erroneous, and his longstanding practice of burying court personnel under mountains of voluminous filings reflects very poorly on him. Moreover, the facts and law presented in written rulings from numerous courts over many years paint a picture of Windsor that is deeply unattractive; the behavior those courts have found him to be engaging in is at least significantly unethical, and now of course there is clear evidence that he has repeatedly violated criminal laws as well.

    [Continued]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I simply do not find it at all plausible that Windsor’s numerous litigation losses are evidence that such a large number of judges and other public officials in numerous jurisdictions—federal, state, and local, in locations thousands of miles apart—have fabricated instances of wrongdoing on his part because they are somehow part of a vast conspiracy to deny justice to innocent people. The logic (such as it is) underlying that conclusion of Windsor’s is continually based, in his specific instances, on his elementary misconceptions of how law and judicial procedure actually operate; Windsor continually interprets this ruling or that loss as “corruption,” when in fact it invariably represents legal professionals applying statutes or rules properly but in a manner that Windsor cannot or will not understand. All of these defeats (in disputes that he believes he should self-evidently win) clearly make the man furious, but they don’t make him right nor his bêtes noires corrupt.

      With all of that as background, it is difficult to ignore the way Windsor has actually operated as the creator and leader of the Lawless America effort. If the two competing hypotheses are (A) Windsor intended to create a high-quality exposé that would help bring justice to victims of judicial corruption and (B) Windsor intended to aggrandize himself before grateful followers while taking vengeance on the public officials he believes to have wronged him, it is hard for me to see how anyone who has watched Windsor’s behavior closely over the past several years can believe that (A) fits the facts better than (B). As more than one concerned LA member posting online has pointed out, Windsor’s continuing pursuit of vendettas against people who have spoken ill of him online (including, as Montana courts among others have found, his outright stalking of them) do nothing whatsoever to advance the interests of victims of judicial corruption—but those actions have an obvious connection to Windsor’s apparent need to avenge himself on his enemies. In the end, after seeing all of this play out for years, it is very difficult for many of us to believe that Windsor has the intentions and goals (to say nothing of the guileless and innocent character) that he claims.

      Then, there’s the experience of watching Windsor continually shooting himself in the figurative foot in his dealings with the judicial system; for a long time he confined that to civil court and a grand jury or two, but now it appears that he’s going to misbehave his way into a lengthy prison sentence that, if he had just stood up and contested the charges against him in a straightforward manner, he almost certainly could have avoided. (Admittedly, there’s more than a little Schadenfreude going into this part of the story. Watching a guy who slathers so much vitriol on my profession fail so very badly at trying to practice it brings with it a not insignificant amount of shameful pleasure. Ah, well.)

      So: I am actually very sympathetic to the motivations that brought most people (including not a few current Joeys) to Lawless America. I would in fact applaud a conscientious filmmaker, TV producer, etc., who set out to do a good job at documenting the kinds of cases that LA purports to be intended to bring to light. Finding, exposing, and rooting out actual judicial corruption is a very valuable (not to mention terribly difficult) thing, and no practitioner of law should be anything but supportive of intelligent efforts to do those things.

      [Continued again]

      Delete
    2. But, after quite a bit of study of these matters, it is clear to many of us that Lawless America, as it has actually been run by Bill Windsor, does not live up to that standard. Its failures as a journalistic exercise are severe, and (perhaps more to the point here) it appears to us that succeeding by those measures is not in fact something that Windsor has ever been terribly interested in. It is our opinion that using Lawless America to help others has always been at best a secondary consideration, if not indeed a fundamentally false pretense.

      Does all of that make sense, Lawless Supporter? I presume you disagree with a large proportion of the above; what is it that leads you to that conclusion?

      Delete
    3. "Elementary misconceptions" is a great way to sum up Bill's understanding of government, business, the judicial system....I dare say being a father...fill in the blank.

      That is probably the biggest reason I cried scam early on and right out of the gate. Real corruption does happen and its horrible. Anyone that actually fights it has all the support I can possibly give to someone. If Bill were actually doing a real documentary movie he would have been more focused and more specific. "Corruption in America" is not a topic, its a generic label. For instance, had bill stayed focused on family court and the inefficiencies of the process that lead to unjust rulings....he might have had something there. But he can't do it, he was willing to bring in any and everyone with whatever topic they wanted as long as they signed up to be a part of his army. That is why, Lawless America, the never will be produced movie would address the topics of:

      property owner rights
      CPS abuse
      Convicted murderer's rights
      Gandparent rights
      Elder abuse awareness
      Mental health issues (ironic)
      unethical business practices (ironic)
      Corrupt Lawyers
      Corrupt Judges
      Corrupt Clerks
      .......and, as bill always says, much much more

      There is no way anything could address all of those topics. But the main thing is, to anyone who doesn't have elementary misconceptions, one topic doesn't really have anything to do with the other. Each one should be addressed on its on.....not thrown together into come kind of sloppy conglomerate of a "documentary movie"

      Delete
    4. Well written, Attorney.

      In summary, and for those who prefer images over words:

      [IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/21brxfp.jpg[/IMG]

      Delete
    5. Second-Chair AttorneyFebruary 20, 2015 at 11:37 AM

      Very cogent and comprehensive post indeed, Attorney.

      With regard to your ultimate conclusion -- that "[i]t is our opinion that using Lawless America to help others has always been at best a secondary consideration, if not indeed a fundamentally false pretense" -- only a brief additional comment needs to be made.

      If you were to go back and listen to several of the TalkShoe calls that Mr. Windsor hosted while preparing for the first Lawless America road trip -- which was done solely for his anticipated movie, which he billed as his and his supporters' best chance to improve all of their circumstances (perceived or real) -- he occasionally expressed the sentiment that all he wanted to do was "win." That's why he also often said that if he were to retain an attorney to represent him in court anytime in the future, he would seek out the largest law firm in town, and his second question to prospective counsel (after "What is your name?") would be whether he or she had any special relationship with (if not an outright bribe to) the judge handling the case that would ensure (in his mind) victory.

      These comments, relatively infrequent though they were, peeled back the thin veneer that the Lawless America road trip and movie were intended to help the group of supporters, along with Mr. Windsor, better their respective situations. If he ever really wanted that, it was a distant second to his ultimate interest: to "win."

      The comments also are evidence -- firsthand, from the man behind Lawless America himself -- of your central conclusion/"opinion," which I of course think is right. His subsequent actions attacking those who he perceived as attacking him, rather than ignoring those people to help his supporters as he had indicated he would, also prove your thesis beyond any real doubt.

      Delete
    6. Bill lied. It did not start out as a movie, it started out as a bitter angry man, documenting his butthurt on line. Then progressed into how he could run the world with a Revolution being the leader. Then and only then, did the idea pop into his pea brain during a talkshoe about making a movie--only to get more people to join in. SMH!

      [IMG]http://i57.tinypic.com/o5u9kz.jpg[/IMG]

      "Founded in 2012
      The Revolutionary Party is building a new political party from the 99% of us who are currently essentially powerless. We elect people who we feel will be honest and protect these fundamental rights, and we have contracts and pass laws that make these elected officials accountable. Our elected officials and judges do what they are supposed to do, or we remove them immediately. By requiring every government official to sign a Contract with the Citizens making them accountable to us through a Grand Jury action, we will be forever protected against the corruption that has eaten our country alive. Never again.

      As to the many other issues that face our country, our new party will not take positions. Our concept is to put truly honest, accountable people in office, and then let them carefully study the issues and make informed decisions. The idea is that honesty, our fundamental rights, and saving America from corruption are what’s most important."
      https://www.facebook.com/TheRevolutionaryParty/info?tab=page_info

      Delete
    7. Ginger:
      There is no way anything could address all of those topics. But the main thing is, to anyone who doesn't have elementary misconceptions, one topic doesn't really have anything to do with the other. Each one should be addressed on its on.....not thrown together into come kind of sloppy conglomerate of a "documentary movie"

      You're probably right—but if so those are elementary misconceptions about filmmaking, not law. As it happens, I know a lot more about one of those things than the other. (Though I do love movies, including well-made documentaries. I'm just no kind of authority about how to make them.)

      Actually I think the LA concept, if done right, would work best as a TV series. You're right that the subject matter Windsor purported to be addressing seems vastly overbroad for a two-hour film, but imagine a lengthy documentary series on a TV network or (these days) streaming service—such a work could absolutely address problems with American judicial practice in that kind of breadth. And if the series were done well, I have to think that Americans would love it. Including lawyers—perhaps especially lawyers!

      Doing it right, though, would require vast resources, including a very large production staff. (Which would absolutely need to include, ahem ahem ahem, a significant number of ... lawyers!) The production would be extraordinarily expensive, complicated, and administratively difficult, which is why a project on that scale will probably never be seriously attempted. (The value of such a work to the public interest would be tremendous, but the dollars-and-cents profit potential would probably be pretty meager. And then there's the terrifying litigation risk!)

      Finally, to return to the main focus of my long comment, the tremendous challenges of such a production very much appear to place it quite a ways beyond Bill Windsor's capabilities, not to mention (it appears to many of us) his actual intentions.

      Delete
    8. Thanks, SCA. Maybe I'm paying you back for the good analysis you posted a few months back.

      I think you're right about the binary "win" idea that seems to have been driving Windsor; it's hard not to see the functional definition of that "win" as "get vengeance on people who have disrespected me."


      But I am honestly interested in hearing what "Lawless Supporter," or anyone else reading these threads who still supports Windsor and/or Lawless America, think about all of the above.

      Supporters: obviously you can see, above, the reasoning that leads many of us to conclude that Bill Windsor is not the hero, or the wronged innocent party, that (we understand) you take him to be. (Obviously this blog has hosted a whole lot more of that reasoning, expressed in ways that are both genteel and not.) Where do you think our logic goes wrong? What are we misunderstanding, or misrepresenting?

      Call it an occupational hazard, but I have this possibly-naïve faith in the power of reasoned discussion to create consensus. LA Supporters, please make yourselves heard! (And if they do, Joeys, please lay off the nastiness in response until/unless it's richly deserved.)

      Delete
    9. Also, lets bring up the liability issue of the stories. Bill, only filmed one side. He is essentially allowing the speaker to make claims/allegations, without verifying facts. This, I assume would be where the lawyers would come in. This is one of the main reasons I said there wouldn't be a movie.

      Windsor tried to claim he would get the other sides, after we all noted that what he had put on youtube was pretty bias. Did he ever do that? No. There are specific things he had to do, in order to make this "movie" a reality, and he failed to do it, yet, he will still claim it's real. It, as it stands now, and has for the past few years, is nothing more than propaganda for his "Revolutionary Party."

      Someone said the other day, I think it was Spam, that the views on many of those videos were poor. Some I've seen had less that 10 views. Windsor, made all kinds of blanket claims regarding those one sided stories, standing up for the "victim" speaking. However, NBTDT had actually vetted those stories, and did an outstanding job of debunking many of them. Those are the ones that would bring lawsuits against Bill if he put them out as he has them. Just as he put them on the disk to congress that they never saw. (actually, they were only links to his dot com, not actual clips) Bias, one sided allegations. Much like what Windsor does himself on his plethora of slanderous dot coms. Makes outrageous claims, yet has zero factual evidence to back up his claims. Just my thoughts.

      Delete
    10. 1) Bill is not an expert producer( MOVIES).
      2) He is not an expert on legal / justice systems.
      3) He does not know how to really vet people, sort out evidence/ facts
      4) He had a terrible experience that flipped him out; MoM in GEORGIA.
      5) Along came the Internet, and Bill fed by his ego tripped out.

      But, did he get entrapped by some trappers in MONT, who were very good baiters.. ? Are they really lil Saints, as well ?
      It was like a train collision.
      Very few here, no the FULL story, the nitty gritty of the people who interacted with BILL. Simply, he was ill equipped to tell their story, in a way that would ring true. However, that LAB guy (SEANO) in Montana, he is probably laughing his ass off, the way he baited Bill, to hit Bill's buttons...?
      If Bull had never gone to Montana, (WITH CAMERA ROLLING) the arrests never would have come to be , in Texas and Mont.
      What is the real lesson here, for all the DUKES OF JUSTICE ?

      Delete
    11. 1) Bill is not an expert producer( MOVIES).
      2) He is not an expert on legal / justice systems.
      3) He does not know how to really vet people, sort out evidence/ facts
      4) He had a terrible experience that flipped him out; MoM in GEORGIA.
      5) Along came the Internet, and Bill fed by his ego tripped out.

      But, did he get entrapped by some trappers in MONT, who were very good baiters.. ? Are they really lil Saints, as well ?
      It was like a train collision.
      Very few here, no the FULL story, the nitty gritty of the people who interacted with BILL. Simply, he was ill equipped to tell their story, in a way that would ring true. However, that LAB guy (SEANO) in Montana, he is probably laughing his ass off, the way he baited Bill, to hit Bill's buttons...?
      If Bull had never gone to Montana, (WITH CAMERA ROLLING) the arrests never would have come to be , in Texas and Mont.
      What is the real lesson here, for all the DUKES OF JUSTICE ?

      Delete
    12. Very well said @Attorney. I agree with all that you stated.
      I was empathetic, too, to the Lawless Supporters, at first.
      I learned a lot this past year going to court with the Windsor Vs The Internet lawsuit. Court proceedings don't always work out as simply as it appears they should. I can easily see how becoming 'fed up' does happen.
      However, I'd much rather have our Judicial System than any other in the world.

      Very bottom line? Windsor did it all wrong. Mostly, he promised desperate & vulnerable individuals things he could never deliver. His turning on his own supporters when they dared ask a question or disagreed with him? Had an idea or suggestion? Was beyond cruel. How many of those were there? So many that I lost count.
      Had ANY of his supporters had a creep sitting in front of their home, buying up their domain names, all while suing them? They'd be hollering to high Heaven.
      Pardon me for losing my empathy for them.
      And? I'm not one teeny tiny bit ashamed of the sheer joy I feel KNOWING how Windsor's lies are about to be exposed to his supporters. Just the evidence on his devices should be enough to finish off the most loyal & staunch supporters. They'll be able to see the Exhibits showing what Windsor was really doing, not doing & what he really thought and felt about them.
      The mere thought of him taking money from those on fixed incomes while he poofed years in Courtyards By Marriott & dining out? Makes me sick.
      Just for what he poofed on bonding out 'his guys' could have helped some of his supporters out of their dire situations. Or the amounts spent at Kinkos? Think of all the good Windsor could've done for those so devoted to him.

      Our system of government could use a lot change, fixing, no doubt. Windsor could have done a lot with his knowledge & his followers, he chose NOT to do that.
      Speaks volumes to me.
      Y'all support away, wasting more time & never moving forward. It's working so well thus far.
      My thoughts & prayers are for all his victims.
      My admiration is to Overstreet, Boushie, Flemming, Round, Emerson and the numerous Law Enforcement, Judges, Court Coordinators, Clerks for having to deal with him far too often.

      Day 1 of a new beginning!
      #LifeIsSoGood

      Delete
    13. Ahh. The now infamous "sting"...

      Delete
    14. Ninja:
      Also, lets bring up the liability issue of the stories. Bill, only filmed one side. He is essentially allowing the speaker to make claims/allegations, without verifying facts. This, I assume would be where the lawyers would come in.

      Yes, definitely. Though you (the producer) would also need our help to make sense of the legal arguments and judicial rulings and whatnot that are at the center of the story.

      A documentary producer with good writers and researchers and intelligent legal counsel absolutely can avoid serious liability exposure. (That threat of litigation is a major reason that the public-figure doctrine in defamation law exists.) But protecting a critical-documentary production from defamation claims ain't cheap, and it ain't easy. It requires serious care and attention, and it's difficult to see how any of that has been applied to the defamation concerns inevitably raised by the Lawless America project.

      Delete
    15. SFW:
      Pardon me for losing my empathy for them.

      Certainly. It's a lot easier for me (and perhaps SCA and others) to be all hifalutin and philosophical, given that we haven't been in the trenches with you. No one has driven a Jeep thousands of miles to lurk outside of our homes, or published nasty things about us or our family members.

      I'm certainly not asking you to be less pissed off about what Lawless America has recently represented in your life. I think your feelings about it are totally understandable and reasonable, given recent events. I hope that's clear.

      Delete
    16. It was very clear, @Attorney! I can see, I do 'get it'.
      But, to continue on & on, down an endless rabbit hole? The perpetual victim? Pffffft ©.
      They shoulda ditched that Bitch Windsor! They most likely could've done far bett on their own.
      Maybe, over time, my empathy will return.... honestly? I'm bored with Windsor. Now that he's caught? Game over. It will be interesting/entertaining to see/hear his BillSchit as a ProSe Criminal Baby!

      I'd bat my lashes, but @Petunia would hoof me!

      Delete
    17. Wonderful well thought out and explained opinions. I think this is one thing the lemmings don't understand about those who post here. We vet stories, check backgrounds and the story being presented. We check multiple sources, and usually can give your actual documentation of the reasoning behind the opinions we have posted.

      Unlike Bill, who expects you to believe because he said it, it is true. His own perception of his court failures (many times based on the misunderstanding of legal concepts and laws) is that he was alwayserroneously ruled against and that it was always corruption. That morphed into conspiracies against him by all involved.

      To be honest, Bill isn't that important, he is not an attorney who comprehends the laws, and spins everything into it being about him. There never were any conspiracies to hurt Bill, or even Lawless America.

      Bill publishes all over the place, in fact there are dozens of recent hate and rant websites he recently put up, many of those domains he has had for years until he had time to copy and paste his rants and hatred and calls for jail, or treason charges.

      Not one of those sites is about any litigation but his own, and/or his anger at having someone disagree, or OMG rule that he was wrong. Bill is incredibly vexatious and has been for many, many years.

      He has also repeatedly said himself there will be no movie until he crushes his enemies in court. He has also repeatedly said he will not give up on his vendetta until the day he dies. Does that sound to you Lawless Supporter, like he ever intended to return to making a 'movie'.

      How would you format a movie from all the endless clips, and no physical evidence, or vetting of the stories? How would this help those in need? Can you point to even one instance of any one of these film clips or Bill helping anyone?

      I can point to cases he harmed. I can point to his own words saying he will punish those he deems enemies. I can point to so many who were only 'guilty' of disagreeing with him.

      The lemmings choose not to look too closely at what he is up to. Many are just like Bill, they don't care what he or anyone else is doing as long as they can talk about their own cases. How the hell does this help anyone beyond having a place to vent their own stories where no one will question the facts?

      Delete
  34. Wow.

    I reread the above a couple of times.

    Very succinct and cogent dissertation. Thank you for taking the time to write it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Attorney, that is. GS beat me to the reply button.

      Delete
    2. I agree @ SpamAnon! @Attorney' & @SecondChair's both!
      I'm always glad to read their views.

      Delete
  35. One of the most primitive and basic elements of being alive is seeing things from your point of view. You are born with it, its the essence of a child. As you grow and develop you begin to learn about the complexities of this world and the different views and angles other people might have....other than your POV.

    Bill and his most adamant followers never developed. They use the magical C word to connect the dots that adults already understand is much different than their conclusion:

    officer gave me a ticket and I didn't like it.....Corruption
    CPS took my kids away just because I was doing drugs....Corruption
    Judge wont let me keep making domain names that try and trick people into buying something they didn't want....Corruption
    Maid of the Mist wont let me keep selling their tickets at whatever price I want with whatever terms I choose.....Corruption

    Its the same thing with a baby playing with a knife.....you took it away, they want it back. A baby has no concept of property ownership, parental guardian responsibilities, or harmful outcomes of playing with said knife. All they know is that knife was theirs because it was in their hand and now its gone, if they will keep screaming at the top of their lungs until you put it back in their hand.

    ReplyDelete
  36. YEAH, Bill had a simplistic view of the world. He was good at selling T Shirts.
    Actually, Bill reminds me of the Ex Mayor of NY, Rudi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor reminds me of our current prez...Barack O'ca-ca.

      Delete
    2. The only thing he reminds me of? A predator. One that preys upon others. Never prays with or for them.

      I'm done thinking of him anymore today!
      Yay!
      Happy Friday y'all!

      #LifIsSoGood
      #MakeMoments

      Delete
    3. But I thought Windsor's Indian name was Runs with Scissors; what gives?

      Delete
  37. If Bill is so smart how did he get baited by that Mont Lab tech,(EL SEANO) who Bill has charged with being on the FED bait / trapper patrol ?
    One question: isn't there a constitutional right to travel ?
    Georgia to Mont, what a trip for Bill, then to Texas, back to Idaho, now awaiting extradition to Missoula, and then a series of ground breaking legal precedents, to unfold, be set by Bill, where he learns the WWW is not a Court.
    But, he had his TEAM, huh, the A TEAM, and JOE ZERNK, the server on
    pretense litigation, and the UN, and Courts.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Woo hoo. I step away from the computer for ONE.DAY and lookie lookie. I didn't think this day would come quite so quickly. ~Ardith

    ReplyDelete
  39. Hi Ardith!!!

    Ok, I take it back!!
    After arraignment in Idaho? BillSchit got way more interesting! Gotta add it to list on #RoadTrip2015!

    #GodBlessAmerica

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello back at you and congratulations! 2015 is going to be your year--I just KNOW IT! We could do a road trip all right. I've never been that far west. I know it's cruel, but I say we load up on peanut butter cups and peach pie and sit in front of the jail and just eat them. Now that would be funny. A tail gate party at the jail!

      Delete
    2. Riiiiiiight? I say we just drive by on our way to somewhere nearby & have huge fun & mail wrappers!

      Delete
    3. Even better idea!

      Delete
  40. Jerry Lundegaard getting arrested at the end of Fargo: http://youtu.be/faVy85fIB2U

    ReplyDelete
  41. Hi Ardith!!!

    Ok, I take it back!!
    After arraignment in Idaho? BillSchit got way more interesting! Gotta add it to list on #RoadTrip2015!

    #GodBlessAmerica

    ReplyDelete
  42. I'd like to thank Bill Windsor for a few things. One, a few individuals that began as blogger adversaries, I now consider friends. (Giggling @ memories of Minister of Propaganda and Alpacaganda, mountain lions and cookies ) Two, my experience with Windsor was my introduction to Internet safety and checking people out a little bit before jumping off a cliff with them. Opened my "Midwestern Everyone is Honest and Scams Happen on the News", eyes up wide open. Three, it gave me the opportunity to work with Law Enforcement /Courts on the same side of the road. When I met Bill, I'd gone through an "event" (ain't hindsight great) that made me see all clouded and angry and biased. I was emotionally convinced (and maybe a little traumatized as much as I hate to say that) that most police/courts/lawyers/government agencies /etc, we're a complete dishonest train wreck. Thanks to Bill, I was quickly convinced that only a few are "corrupt" and our system for the most part works as best it can. Four, my being physically stalked kinda killed the "poor me, victim " thing I was going through. Something about a crazy man with a gun driving across the damn country to circle your home and try to get pictures of your kids, smacks the "victim " right outta ya. At first I hid in my house, had the police over all the time, filed my protection order, moved my children to a different address. But after awhile, I'd stand out on my front porch waving, and just waiting for the coward to get out of his jeep and step towards my family. He's got rolls of film of my middle finger. And if he'd of crossed the property line, he'd of filmed my heritage card carrying skills. Five, he directed me to this blog, when I was still his assistant, and I've gotten countless laughs reading over here. It ain't over til the fat lady sings, or so they say. But it's nice to know that he is being dealt with. Thank you to everyone who has ever helped stop, expose, or warn others of him. (And no PhlegmShady, I'm not sitting on a hotbed of information that I won't turn over to authorities. It's long been turned over, many times, in many states. I know, not as exciting a story as the ex assistant holding self incriminating information, but it is what it is. )

    Happy second arrest, everyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Make that third arrest...1) arrested, released on $100K bail on a Black Amex, 2) returned to jail to sign paperwork, then re-arrested. 2) arrested in Idaho.

      Delete
    2. And most of all, Allie is hilarious.....both while she was minister of propaganda and after her exile. That really was the main point of the blog in the first place, be funny.

      Delete
    3. Who better to preach salvation than a sinner...

      That's a compliment, by the way, Allie.

      Delete
    4. As THE minister of AlpacaGanda?
      I luff Allie's guts, real hard.

      Delete
  43. To All - My name is Dale Karin Trowbridge and I have never been a “joey” as you all know. But Windsor opened a website in my name stating I was one of the “joeys” with untrue defamatory information. He published a copy of my investment check, of $5,000, with my account number and address. A website I would have never known existed if not for my friend Renee (another “non-joey” who also has a Windsor hate website in her name.) and SempiFi from this sight. Thanks to them I was able to close my account prior to any damages.

    Sadly I have read derogatory comments on this sight against Renee. She is a big girl and take care of herself I just wanted to express my feelings regarding the comments. As to whether DA Wilson was/is responsible to contact and notify all of the victims that Windsor has opened a website in their names; I’m not sure. However it only makes sense to me for DA Wilson to do so since all information is available to him. I believe people have lost sight of what, I believe, this is about to - help victims. Renee just as I and most if not all of you have been re-victimized by Windsor. Accordingly I would hope those of you whom have written belittling (hurtful) comments about Renee would have the honor to retract those statements, they are neither here or there concerning the real outcome – THE ARREST OF WINDSOR.

    BOTTOM LINE it is the responsibility of all (including me) to make sure all victims are notified; as stated earlier I would have never known about “my” website if I had not been contacted. I could have suffered enormous financial losses if I had not been notified. Just as other victims he has “exposed” may be in physical danger due to Windsor publishing their addresses and contact information. And not all have the luxury of filing charges against Windsor in the jurisdiction they reside in for various reasons. Please keep this in mind.

    I will be filing charges against Windsor to my County Police Department on Monday, I have not filed sooner because I have been waiting for all of the information (talk shoes, name domains, court documents, etc, etc.) Renee has been busily putting together for me and all of us victims; we should all be thanking her for the endless hours and hard work she has put into our efforts to nail Windsor. This same information is invaluable for the filing of the class action lawsuit. I intend on presenting all information to my County DA with contact information to DA Wilson so they may collaborate, I am still wondering if this may be a case for the FBI since there are victims throughout the United States.

    Please contact me on several issues; first being I have no problem contacting all victims Windsor has opened “hate” websites on. I thought you may have an easy list to help me do so if not I will just go from sight to sight. Second I will also ask all if they would be interested in being a client in a class action lawsuit against Windsor. Third, I guess it’s not an issue, but please remember we are all victims and should stay focused upon the issue – making sure Windsor is held responsible for his liable actions. If you disagree please let me know, I have only read your website the past two days.

    Dale Karin Trowbridge – I have no problem with having my real name known.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I believe people have lost sight of what, I believe, this is about to - help victims"

      Nah, this is just a dumb blog. No mission, no creed, no goals, no advocacy.....nothing but a blog. If people wised up to Bill's scam as a result of reading here great....but that's not the mission.

      Delete
    2. Excuse me I wrote believe because I have only read this site for the last two days. I did not mean to insult anyone. Most all I have read has been yipppeee Windsor is arrested. Believe me I too say yippee the big bad wolf is caught. If you have read my entire comment you have seen I have volunteered my time in regards to informing all victims of Windsors hate sites.

      I have no intentions of harming, insulting or making fun of anyone.......so please read my comment without condescending thoughts towards me. Sorry if I have offended you in anyway. Dale Karin Trowbridge

      Delete
    3. I know you wrote believe and I read the entire comment. I only wanted to clarify the misperception

      Delete
    4. I can understand why you wanted to do that, however I felt your sarcasm a insult towards me. All fine now? Dale Karin Trowbridge

      Delete
    5. I have no idea if all is fine or not. You and Rene can stay, leave or do whatever you want. On this blog we are not gonna bash LE just because they don't do things the way we want. Isn't that exactly why you went to bill in the first place?

      Delete
    6. Ginger Snap,
      No, neither Dale nor I went to Windsor for LE bashing,
      In my case, I had reported a Judge who had failed to protect dv victims / honor their PPO's. The case 'disappeard' during the midst of the investigation. The Judge was put back on the bench. Within 6 months, two DV victims, whose divorces were before him, were murdered by their abusers because of the Judge's mishandling of their cases.
      And, FYI, I did not bash the LE the other night. I questioned the COURT for allowing Windsor to be released, although he had not met bond conditions with the release of SeanBoushie.com

      Delete
    7. Renee, we're all still waiting for you to show us where you're getting these bond conditions. I know you won't be able to because they don't exist.

      Delete
    8. Speaking for myself, I wouldn't want to join a class action lawsuit with those who volunteered for Windsor, or who gave him money. Seems those who were his volunteers/donors might want to consider that the claims may differ from those who never volunteered for him or gave him money (ya know, the ones who were smart enough not to).

      The company one keeps speaks volumes - mixing volunteers/donors with those who simply became victims of Windsor's after trying to warn/educate the volunteers and donor wouldn't be wise.

      Apples and oranges.

      Delete
    9. I think the LE bashing Ginger referred to was regarding Renee bashing D.A. Wilson, etc., for not arresting Windsor according to her timestamp.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. Sounds like you're bashing Wilson to me.



      Renee HarrringtonFebruary 18, 2015 at 9:03 PM
      Anon@ 6pm. Yes, the Commissioners did discuss Windsor - behind closed doors, during the meeting - but they did not come to a resolution.
      My take: the State of Texas isn't going to do anything about Windsor, and he won't be arrested unless he goes to Montana.
      And, that could be the reason why DA Wilson isn't filing any additional charges against Windsor in regards to these hate-websites.

      Delete
    12. [img]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10206308913791943&set=pcb.10206308918512061&type=1[/img]

      Delete
    13. *****rolls eyes****
      ok, not LE in your case but a judge that made you go running to Bill. A government official performing their duty of office with a result you don't like.....led you to Windsor. There is that better?

      Delete
    14. Renee Harrington February 18, 2015 at 9:06 PM
      SFW,
      I hope to hell DA Wilson does something now.

      Delete
    15. Renee, I was one of the anons that suggested you go to your own DA,/ Judge in Michigan not think, demand or expect Wilson to handle your confidential address as a DV being exposed & exploited in a Windsor website.
      I too am a "Survivor ( I refuse to call myself a victim ) of Aggravated Assault attempted murder by my X husband in Michigan. I was never given a confidential address even after spending six months in the hospital recovering from my injuries he inflicted upon me. When my X contacted me after he got out of jail, I contacted my DA/prosecutor who immediately had a judge sign a No Trespass order as I already had a lifetime RO in place.

      Delete
    16. Anon I am also a survivor obviously before your time. I was severely abused by my X called cops etc to only be told they do not get involved in domestic disputes. He had guns pressed against my face so close that when the gun went off I felt the air. I told him I would rather die than live with him; he than told me he would kill my mom and dad, my nieces and sister so I went from 10 foot high and bulletproof to about an inch high. And yes I had three children with him of which they are my most precious loves of my life, however it was marital rape. I finally got the courage to file for divorce insisting I have a protective order in place. Guess what my atty was worthless did not have a protective and was beat with my clothes ripped off in front of my 3 year old son. So my question to you is what year did this happen to you and what county did you live in? I am also a Michigan victim. I ask you to please share your info.

      Delete
    17. I'm truly sorry for what happened to you Anon@1252, with that said ... as a survivor I never would divulge any of my personal details including dates, place of incident or my name online to total strangers.
      Surely as a DV survivor you know that divulging any personal info to strangers on the WWW is dangerous and could compromise my safety.
      Yes, protective orders are basically useless however I didn't just sit back & cry about it, I went to my prosecutor and obtained a no trespass order.
      My whole point was that DA Wilson is not who Renee should be expecting to handle her issues with BW, but the prosecutor in her county in Michigan. And, this is not a DV forum / blog or the place to chat about DV. I come here to read the blog & occasionally comment .. I've learned to like many of the people on here and have been rooting along with them for BW to face justice for what he has put them through .. not to discuss DV .

      Delete
  44. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  45. It's posted on my FB page

    https://www.facebook.com/reneeharringtonmioidv/posts/10206308918512061

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/1924657_10206308913791943_1729235861712648070_n.jpg?oh=46b12c9f494da207fb4a767c2fac9fa9&oe=559496C4&__gda__=1431261807_b3f42690f00218b018872f86ae39665e[/img]

      Delete
    2. That's the conditions for bond in Montana. You'll notice one of the other conditions is he can't leave Missoula Co. So is that also a condition TEXAS was supposed to enforce when issuing a TEXAS bond?

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. [img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/1798772_10206308914831969_1160896156451377412_n.jpg?oh=9a2ed5ae40ab6f5a087eab0271a35fcc&oe=55915038&__gda__=1431533491_81260cd048c4ae6b99cd61edab3e0763[/img]

      Delete
    5. The reason I have this, is because the police here obtained it for me. They were responsible for my safety while Windsor was on the run and re-victimizing everyone.

      Delete
    6. Anon, Yes - according to the court transcripts, DA Wilson argued with the Judge over this - because the Judge was the one who overruled Wilson and allowed Windsor to be released w/o releasing SeanBoushie.com

      Delete
    7. That's the point eveyone is making. "The judge overruled." While you haven't produced a transcipt to even prove that, it's still the point. The judge in TX set Texas bond. Not Montana. Montana didn't get their governor's warrent together in time and TX set the bond. TX set the rules. Personally I think he should not have had a PR bond, but otherwise the terms were appropriate. The website fight was not for TX to have. All their bond was to guarantee was that Bill promised to be in court when he was ordered to.

      Delete
    8. Several commentors here have had that document since November the 3rd. We had it because we called the MT prosecutor and asked them to email it. That document had no bearing on the bond Texas chose to issue. If it wasn't for Ellis Co, Windsor would still be roaming the country harassing me. The only thing Windsor never did to you was make a website nobody read. Did you ever see Windsor parked in front of your house? Photographing you kids, parents, it other loved ones? Get over your victim mentality and quit bashing the people who actually help rid you of the menace you love to claim you're a victim off.

      Delete
    9. Anon you r sickening. Why don't you tell me your name and why you have been victimized beyond Windsor. Dale Karin Trowbridge.

      Wow Anon I am appalled by your statement, I would not want to be part of a class action suit involving a financer or volunteer of Windsor. Ginger Snap my case has nothing to do with law enforcement. FACT; the Michigan State Police are my and my daughters’ heroes. So back down on your erroneous thoughts, which should have never be published anywhere without supporting evidence. I sincerely hope Anon and Ginger Snap are not the founders of this website. If you are not then there is the possibility the real founders my actually care and accept my help. Renee and I have no alternative motive beyond exposing the illegal actions of the judiciary and other branches of the government. My number one priority is to prevent others from experiencing the horror I, my daughter, my other three children (not involved in this case) along with other family members and friends have. You must understand the trickle down effect which involves all who love and care. Renee’s case is different than mine but I know she too is out to prevent additional victims of corruption.

      Perhaps you have never suffered as severely as I have. Perhaps you have not been pleading for exposure to prevent the unlawful abuse of children and good families caught within the vicious web of the court. My political representatives refused to help stating “the judiciary is a different branch of government”. My repeated attempts with the media were ignored; who in my best estimation are afraid of the judiciary. My nightmare began December 8, 1999 do the math; I have been attempting for 15 years (with 100% proof) to expose the illegal, unjust judiciary. My daughter suffered four years of emotional, mental and physical abuse due to the unlawful corrupt rulings of Eaton County MI, under the power of Judge Thomas S. Eviland. I was actually such a fool I once believed the Appellate Court would overturn the ruling. Yep once again inept believing the judicial tenure commission would hold the corrupt parties responsible for their actions.

      I still have all proof and do not appreciate your Anon comment of “I would not want to be involved in a class action suit…….” Guess what I would not want to be in a class action suit with someone as uncaring as you. But Anon I am not sure if all participants on this website agree with you. I hope not anyway, if they all do agree with you and Ginger Snap I will never post on this site again; if not contact me at trowbridge.dale@yahoo.com. (Btw what are your real names and cases? Obviously Renee and I have no problem being known.) Anyhow I am done with this site if not contacted by the originators appreciating my desire to help.

      Wow victimized by the judiciary, re-victimized by Windsor and re-re-victimized by this site. Total insanity.

      Extremely confused, Dale Karin Trowbridge.

      Delete
    10. So you were victimized by this site because someone said they woudn't want to be in a class action suit with you? As long as you can claim to be a victim.......

      Maybe you and Renee should just go back to her widely read blog.

      Delete
    11. Good Gawd Almighty!
      This? ^ above? Goofy sniping shit? This another reason, besides Windsor is a flop, is why Lawless FAILED.
      STACY EMERSON has had a Bill Windsor Files & Archives going for over a year!

      Dale? I'm a decent human. I saw your check plastered & did the best I could. I'm glad it helped.
      The #DA, #LE, #Judge bashing? I ain't in on any of that.
      If any of y'all think I skipped outta the Ellis County courtroom after my ass going flat from hours of Windsor pontificating & Judge Carroll attempting to wade thru those treacherous waters, you are slap assed too stupid to suck from a straw.

      I comment here. I'm NOT a JOEY. I am me, KellieMcDougald. I speak for me. No one else. My opinion may differ from GingerSnap's. As a matter of fact, it has. I don't recall getting the red ass over it. I do get hot over #SovCitzAssRags #PerpetualVictims & bashing those that put their LIVES on the line daily to protect us & that goes for DAs, ADAs & Judges. I'm biased, I live in Kaufman County, Texas where our DA, his wife & the ADA were assinated.
      Perhaps DA Wilson & his investigators did a lot, maybe it is not anything we need to be privy to?
      I do know EVERYTIME I called that office? I was listened to & spoken to with great respect & got the answer I needed.
      You don't know how to proceed with getting your .hatecom site down? STEP1 Call & make appointment with your county's DA. STEP2 Fill out report. They'll help you from there. Be prepared, it isn't going to disappear overnight. Ask Boushie or Overstreet or any of the dozens of others.

      It irks me to no GD end that THE one thing I'd thought we could ALL relish? Rejoice in? Someone has to go get butt-fuqing-hurt.
      Don't wanna read shitty retorts to shitty comments?
      Log off.

      I'm outta this bitch. There's beer to be drank, music playing & fun to be had!

      #SemperFiLife

      Delete
    12. Just do not get your vindictive attitude, are you one of Windsors cronies? Cuz in my opinion all victims regardless of cases, situations should stick together. Dale Karin Trowbridge.

      Delete
    13. That's the point eveyone is making. "The judge overruled." While you haven't produced a transcipt to even prove that, it's still the point. The judge in TX set Texas bond. Not Montana. Montana didn't get their governor's warrent together in time and TX set the bond. TX set the rules. Personally I think he should not have had a PR bond, but otherwise the terms were appropriate. The website fight was not for TX to have. All their bond was to guarantee was that Bill promised to be in court when he was ordered to.

      Delete
    14. That's the point eveyone is making. "The judge overruled." While you haven't produced a transcipt to even prove that, it's still the point. The judge in TX set Texas bond. Not Montana. Montana didn't get their governor's warrent together in time and TX set the bond. TX set the rules. Personally I think he should not have had a PR bond, but otherwise the terms were appropriate. The website fight was not for TX to have. All their bond was to guarantee was that Bill promised to be in court when he was ordered to.

      Delete
    15. Dale and Renee: did any of yall's LE ever attempt to get in touch with The Ellis County DA? also if no, then why not? If it was that big a deal then shouldn't they have attempted to, also SemperFI is not a cronie, she was actually physically stalked by Windsor, so It'd be best to take that statement back, and Yes also I agree people should stick together, however when people attempt to complain that 1 or 2 DA's aren't doing enough, when they can do NOTHING for anyone that is out of there jurisdiction, also Renee complains, but yet has said she has a lot of High Goverment people reading her blog and also using it, so she should be able to get it taken care of in a snap, see her comment below:


      "Renee Harrrington
      Great point, Anon 3:30pm, about Windsor blabbering anything he is told, as if it is fact.

      I have run the MichiganOIDV website for years - and the only way I will publish something is if it is from a credible newspaper, or from court records. Numerous state and federal agencies, and media use MIOIDV - as a source. In other words, I have to be able to back up everything that is on my website."

      Delete
    16. Sempifi I did not write that last comment about you. I appreciate all you have done for me. Hope you knew that. However once again confused by your comment are you bashing me or joeys? I only wrote again on this site cuz I thought you may have taken my last comment as a bash against you. Want to know if you are friend or foe; I believe friend but once again I openly admit to my past misjudgments. Once again friend or foe I very much appreciate you contacting me. This will be for sure my last post just want to know where you and I are at.


      Dale Karin Trowbridge

      Delete
    17. I'm curious what, specifically, would you want to achieve with a class action lawsuit against Windsor?

      Delete
  46. Sorry about my repeat posts. My phone has a mind of its own

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All things considered, I forgive you.

      Delete
  47. As someone who is not involved but has followed this out of curiosity for a year or so: To summarize, Bill has used a veil of "Being a Journalist," as protection for his string of vexatious legal actions and defamatory websites made against people who disagree with his opinions. These actions go back years, and started with the "Maid of the Mist" lawsuit, and may also extend to other lawsuits years before.

    There is the question of whether Bill's actions are legitimate journalism or are stalking, but the courts say that he is not a legitimate journalist, but a stalker.

    So how did Bill's original goal to prove corruption get confused by his stalking? The answer is it wasn't his original goal at all. He got started by filing vexatious lawsuits and then invented “Lawless America” as a way of covering this all up.

    Someone correct me if I am wrong. I'm curious. Plus I live in Missoula and am interested in attending his hearings here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sounds pretty much right to me

      Delete
    2. Geez I guess I am a liar because I am once again posting. But I had not read the previous posts prior to posting. First Sempifi I appreciate you more than you could know for informing about my "website". Second Brannon I am going to my county police on Monday and also DA sharing DA Wilsons contact info but you would know that if you had read my original post. To All from Dale Karin Trowbridge; I just do not understand why you would insult other victims regardless of their involvement with Windsor. I have already posted too much because it is clear to me ya'll do not care about victims outside of Ellis County. That is by no means meant about Sempifi. Btw thank you orig anon (which will not share real name or circumstances) and Gingersnap you have both helped my case of never being a Joey. Bye for good. Dale Karin Trowbridge

      Delete
    3. Bye!!! and I never insulted other victims, based on there involvement with Windsor, I just don't like the bashing of our DA or pissy attitude about it, I think it's rather cuntish to do that, and awesome glad your going to your DA, maybe Renee can learn something and to be honest I personally don't care about everyone, there are certain people I care about, others I could give a shit less, that's called human nature, I've never come on here to act like I care about everyone, now I need another beer!! should I be more honest or point blank? also Im sure you will be back

      Delete
    4. Why did he originally target you?

      Delete
    5. Sorry, I'm sure I could google it and find it eventually.

      Delete