Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Windsor Breaks Down in Jail


After one week in County lock up, Bill is at the breaking point.  This is someone who has lived his life on the upgraded plan.  He was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and it was ripped away from him for the first time in his life, last week.  As he continues to wait for his no frills ride up to Montana, Windsor now knows that his life as he knows it could be coming to an end.  Frivolous lawsuits, stalking, harassing, defaming people online must take a back-seat as he now must find a way to rebut the very serious charges the State of Montana is charging him with.

His lawsuit against Facebook was dismissed last week and his crazy Joey lawsuit is hanging by a thread as he has a hearing Thursday morning and I'm guessing this won't be an excuse that will fly. Will he even be here Thursday?  Will the County let him go to the hearing if he is?  If he can't copy and paste his motions....what argument can he come up with?

And then lets think ahead to his looming Montana case.  Remember how all Bill ever wanted was a chance to be heard in front of a jury?  He may get that chance.  Will all of his past sins and victims come together to testify against him?  I think a DA could make just about any jury hate Bill with his long established pattern of behavior.  Will he be offered a plea?  So much drama yet to unfold, and we will be glued to our keyboards in anticipation.

186 comments:

  1. I just thought I was anxious for last week's hearing!
    Thursday's? A sheriff, a DA & 13 deputies couldn't keep me from my front row seat!

    Let's all get vexi, now!

    Daydream for a moment that Montana waits until just before the Judge takes the bench to fetch Windsor! That? Would just be even better than last week's elevator arrest! He thought he was being protected as he pranced out, surrounded by LE!
    Elevators will forever remind him of that fateful ride:)

    Thank you, God! Karma is so sweet!

    KMc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahaha. Winbag is finally getting what he deserves. At least he can't make threats by email, facebook and by driving to another state to a house of one of his many victims.

      Delete
    2. Hahahahahahaha, 6 days in jail. http://elliscountysheriff.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17&Itemid=30

      Delete
  2. "Will all of his past sins and victims come together to testify against him?"
    My thoughts exactly. I wouldn't be surprised if the DA has already collected evidence of Windsor's actions against all of us to support the felony warrant against Windsor.
    The DA can use evidence of what Windsor has subjected us to in a hearing before the Judge for setting bond for Windsor - as proof of Windsor's calculated and repeated violations of the laws.
    And yes, the DA can use evidence of Windsor's actions against us at his MT trial.
    It all points to two things: Windsor has complete disregard for the law, and Windsor is DANGEROUS to anyone who crosses him for whatever reason.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Does ESCO do video-link for court or is the inmate transported to the courtroom in cuffs and shackles?:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If for the Montana case by will be transported for all texas cases he will be at walked via underground tunnel

      Delete
  4. Fear not, Lemmings. I have it on good authority that MaryD will assume the duel rolls of representing Windsor while heading up the Revolution...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Vogon_poetry

      Delete
    2. A brief scan of the recent MaryD melt down, repeated rants, by and thru, clearly shows she alone violated her own HIPAA confidentiality, and clearly lays out why she earned the "Munchausen" title.

      Her children are grown, and in excellent health. One has a child of her own, runs marathons, and is thriving. The other one is also very active and looks extremely healthy. If these "children" were untreated, they would not be living the life they are. Munchausen Mary needs serious help Lynn, not your enabler comments.

      Delete
  5. How do other victims of Windsor file affidavits in Montana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent question! I'm thinking amicus curiae brief may be in order, especially for those who have had web domains of their names cyber-squatted by Windsor. Note Judge Larson's comment in his
      Order Affirming Municipal Court Ruling and Order to Remand, Cause No. DC-13-969, Nov. 14, 2013:

      Windsor's website at SeanBoushie.com is not Windsor's only website, nor is it his only website devoted to specifically harassing and threatening a particular individual. One need only visit one of Windsor's multiple other websites like Allie Overstreet.com or ClaudineDombrowski.com to note that what Windsor has done to Boushie is not an attempt to protect himself from Boushie. It is clearly a calculated pattern of behavior Windsor uses to intimidate and harass anyone who disagrees with Windsor.

      Once Larson to orders the forfeiture of Windsor's domains, I think the ISPs will remove the domains from Windsor's account and control.

      Delete
  6. It looks like Mary D and Lynn Maris are having a contest. Which lemming is the bigger dumbass. Right now I think it's a tie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, it's a mental deficiency contest for sure. I have to wonder, if MaryD has a "gag order" like she says, why on earth she doesn't STFU? How many times can she post the same stupid crap? Over and over...it's like, yeah, everyone gets it, but no one cares. You're a nut!

      Delete
    2. So what you're sayin' is...Mary's gettin' by and though her gag order?

      Delete
    3. LOL!! ^^

      I have to ask the two twitwits over there, if they can prove anything they are saying. Word has it--it was Crystal Cox impersonating Boushie, to set him up, like she has in the past, which is why she's getting shafted in the courts herself.

      I also have to wonder why other lemmings being sued by Cox, are over there supporting Windsor, who has Cox on as many admins and editor of Lawless. These idiots have no idea just how deceptive and twisted Cox is. Scanning the complaints against her? She should be behind bars IMO.

      Delete
    4. Well written, and I agree completely. I know there have been very outspoken critics of Boushie here in the past (but I guess one of them found something better to do). What the critics never got was the simple fact that IP numbers and email addresses can EASILY be spoofed. Furthermore, anyone can find the IPs for the U of MT's WiFi on the web--they're on their web site.

      Delete
    5. Here's another fun tid bit. Crystal Cox's sidekick in the lawsuits? Eliot Bernstein? Yeah that guy? He was on the GRIP steering committee.
      http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=621:what-are-the-goals-for-grip-grip-part-3&catid=107:grip-government-reform-a-integrity-platform&Itemid=105

      Talk about an incestuous history with these assholes. Roxanne Grinage, who was also being sued by Cox, also happened to be targeted by Windsor, after he tried to grab all her contacts and milk her brain about setting up the "business." When Roxanne told Windsor his contract wasn't legal, and questioned him on victim safety for his "data base" he went sideways and called her a "hater."

      There is far more behind the scenes to Cox, Bernstein, and Windsor than people realized when making assumptions.

      Delete
    6. And...Joey's Super Troll, Snoozan, AKA Sharon V,. was one of the key members in the original GRIP conclave.

      Delete
    7. I visited the LA site between November of 2010 and May of 2011. During that time Willy announced that he would create an activist organization and call it GRIP. No effort was made to create that organization while I was there and there were no members of GRIP at that time.

      To the best of my knowledge the original GRIP conclave was formed in January 2012, long after my departure from LA.

      Delete
    8. But your sidekick George McDermott stayed.

      Delete
    9. Sharon? You "Visited" the site? Really? SMH!! You were the admin for the "forum" until you pissed your little Willy off.

      You were the one supposedly who came up with the "Umbrella" game. Where little Willy would glom on to other groups numbers for self promotion, while using their numbers to boost his own. SMH semantics must be a Vexatious thing.

      There were no members at that time? Really? That's a big fat lie. The same people that helped create the "group" were on the steering committee. If your semantic spin is that Windsor didn't formally publish the names of the members until 2012--you're just an idiot. Oh look--seems this is the lay out of your idea on how to glom on to others for self promotion. Put down the Kool-Aid Snooze. SMH troll.

      http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=625:its-time-to-start-drinking-the-kool-aid&catid=124:articles&Itemid=219

      Delete
    10. It's really quite entertaining watching people like Susan suddenly trying to put some distance between themselves and Windsor. RUN SUSAN RUN!

      Delete
    11. "You were the admin for the "forum""

      Correct. I CREATED and moderated a forum for LA for about two weeks.

      "You were the one supposedly who came up with the "Umbrella" game."

      Correct. I suggested that Willy form an alliance with all of the other pre-existing activist groups. I don't know how you think that would have affected the numbers of any group formed by Willy, but whatever.

      "There were no members at that time? Really? That's a big fat lie. The same people that helped create the "group" were on the steering committee."

      There WAS NO GROUP during 2011 and by the summer of 2011 I don't think anyone left to suggest the creation of a group. The people that originally visited LA during early 2011 were gone long before Willy announced he had formed a steering committee in early 2012.

      "If your semantic spin is that Windsor didn't formally publish the names of the members until 2012--you're just an idiot."

      You are right. It makes a lot more sense to believe he formed a steering committee in early 2011 and kept that committee a secret for a year. That must be what happened. You are incredibly good at piecing together events that you did not witness!

      "Oh look--seems this is the lay out of your idea on how to glom on to others for self promotion "

      Sort of. Sometime in late 2011 or early 2012 Willy apparently got a group of other activist sites to agree to post a link to LA. I would hardly call that an alliance, though it was a start.

      These facts are the same as they were when I told them to you the previous 6-7 times, lol.

      @8:33: I'm not trying to put any distance anywhere. I have been quite critical about Windsor in the past. I have also defended many of his actions. I stand by all of my previously published opinions.

      I have also been quite critical of the GENII and I still hold those opinions. The difference is, there is no way to defend any of what happens on this blog. I consider this blog a much larger blight on society than Willy has ever been.

      Delete
    12. ↑↑↑↑-TROLL ALERT-↑↑↑↑

      MARKED FOR IMMEDIATE DELETION!

      Delete
    13. I'm new to both this blog and Mr. Windsor. I find in the latter a large helping of delusion. Not that Bill believes what he says, but that he believes others will believe it. He believes he has an air-tight presentation. I've seen this form of delusion before. It is dangerous.

      This blog? I see no similar delusions here. I don't see any blight on society here, and now that Bill is being called to account, no further harm from him either. The potential for that harm was absolutely there though. He's not in jail for nothing.

      Delete
    14. What I mean is, protective orders are not granted for revenge. They're named that for a reason. They protect a person or persons from danger.

      Delete
    15. Anon 6:23,

      Welcome! Welcome! Sorry about the bit of nastiness above, but we have at least one troll who posts here, and we've learned the best way to handle the troll is by deleting her posts as quickly as possible.

      Delete
    16. Sharon--STFU. You first claimed you "Visited" the site. Now you admit you were admin. You "Visited the site, yet you now admit you helped create the idea for the "Umbrella" game. So, since you don't tell the truth, until you're called out, there is no reason to believe anything else you say.

      And, clearly since you don't know how Windsor wrote about using the other groups numbers to boost his own following, that's your own stupidity talking again.

      Little Willy kicked you out, yet you hung around, talking crap, just like you do here. Now the question is since you keep pointing out that it's all a game, just how deep you're really in it, but that might just air itself in the near future. Since your little Willy never added you to the lawsuits, even though he said he would, it leaves little doubt as to the game--but we'll see.

      Now, kindly piss off back to your party of one blog, where you think your opinions mean something. You have no credibility here--never have, never will.

      Delete
    17. @6:23: In order to see the delusions here you would have to be aware of the actual facts.

      I think most people have the potential to cause harm if they are pushed to it. If we arrested people based on that criteria there would be more people in jail than out of jail.

      @Anon 6:58: You are a class act. You sound a tad upset and maybe that is contributing to your fact blindness. Take some Tylenol and get some rest!

      Delete
    18. My fact blindness? LMAO. You omitted facts, I brought them into light--perhaps your medical issues have spread to other parts of your brain? No term memory? I've read it all, and know you are full of shit. Get over yourself. I wouldn't waste any energy getting "upset" over your pathetic ass. I find it completely humorous how you chose to "remember" things and when, and how you actually think anyone here cares about your opinions. It's just nice to post up the actual facts--after you make an ass out of yourself. Toodles troll.

      Delete
    19. At 10:43 someone wrote, "And...Joey's Super Troll, Snoozan, AKA Sharon V,. was one of the key members in the original GRIP conclave."

      The facts you brought "into the light" were not material to my correction of the statement above. You made a false statement, I corrected it, you attempted to justify your statement with irrelevant facts and did your best to muddy the water. Undaunted by such details as the truth, you continue to believe whatever it is you want to believe.

      This is the way of the GENII and a PERFECT example of how you establish FACTS here. You are not delusional though, definitely not, lmao. I'll see you on the next round, carry on.

      Delete
    20. HAHAHAHAHA OMG!! See, here you are, mixing two separate comments together to spin. I did bring the facts into light you omitted in your I "Visited" the site rubbish. You are just plain out a liar and just as much of a semantic twisting freak as your little Willy.

      The "GENII" have proven beyond a preponderance of evidence you Sharon are a NOBODY-- you have zero credibility anywhere. You are insignificant. Period.

      Delete
    21. Delusional? I thought you wrote Windsor would win all of his personal jurisdiction arguments against non-residents of Texas, but your expert legal analysis was proved to be wrong last week. Of course, you won't own that.

      Delete
    22. When and where did I say he would be able to get PJ over all of the non-residents? I may have said that none of you can be sure he WON'T but I can't imagine I predicted that he WOULD.

      By all means direct me to any such statement and I'll be happy to own it. I've owned a few mistakes here when I'm shown evidence of them. That's more than I can say for anyone else here.

      Delete
    23. Looks like someone is missing her willy tonight.

      Delete
    24. Ok Sharon--back in your box troll.

      Delete
    25. Typical BS from Sharon V. ..."where did I say...?" Let's assume you've never said that...fine. But now you're firmly on the other horn of that bull, ie, you think it's OK for Windsor to file vexatious suits against non-residents and folks who have never had anything to do with Windsor.

      Don't give us that BS you'll be happy to own it--YOU ARE A LIAR AND A TROLL AND A HYPOCRITE. You have no legal, moral or ethical right to continue to be a troll on this site--NONE!

      Delete
    26. Geeez, ::wipes face:: some of your spit flew right through the screen that time 9:23. You really must calm down. I'm having a flashback to Yappy's "DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I AM A RAPE VICTIM!" meltdown.

      "you think it's OK for Windsor to file vexatious suits against non-residents and folks who have never had anything to do with Windsor."

      And uh, WHERE have I ever said THAT? You can dream up anything you want and claim I said it, but that won't make it true.

      I feel sorry for you since you have admitted several times that your IQ is 45. See what I did there? Huh? See it? LMAO

      Delete
    27. Screw you Galloway. You are a heartless bitch. I hope your karma is swift for that shit.

      Delete
    28. Same old crap from Sharon V. Galloway.

      http://supportcommunity.swisscom.ch/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/16283iC4BD6153177FB0E7?v=mpbl-1

      Delete
    29. Sharon helped Crystal Cox: http://secretjustice.com/D.StoneA-G7-28-11.doc

      Delete
    30. SMH! See, it is an incestuous group of fake activists/advocates IMO. Previously, this would have shocked me, but not after researching many of the Windsor connections and who they target.

      Delete
    31. As with everything else, the GENII make up their own facts regarding my identity.

      Guess #6,203 is Sharon V. Galloway. I do not confirm or deny any guesses. I have repeatedly stated that Susan Harbison is my screen name.

      Delete
  7. ---Word has it--it was Crystal Cox impersonating Boushie, to set him up, like she has in the past, which is why she's getting shafted in the courts herself---

    Wow. This explains a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Regarding "Windsor Breaks Down in Jail" is this just a general impression or are there reports I missed in the previous thread?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll give a very vivid description of him IF he's in attendance on Thursday.
      How's that?
      I bet he has same security 'protecting' him. We'll start there:).

      MaryD is so happy to be posting like a crack head fresh outta rehab! Windsor isn't around to reel her back!

      No icons MaryD! Don't be scared! You are just goofy & even your fellow commenters are sick of your tired re-runs! Makes me wonder if she got bopped on the back of her head softly? Would her broken record skip forward? Nah, that's just her only tune! "By and thru...."
      Dear Lord? Please have all ticks migrate AWAY from her, no critter should ever catch what she's's got!
      If I find a great big gray dog tick? I'm keeping it, & naming it MaryD!

      I'm envisioning her first visit with her Messiah when he gets to Montana! He better be so thankful for that thick glass! His mail? She will get hand cramps!
      Bwahahahahaha!!! It just gets better & better!

      Delete
    2. Nothing specific, no. But a logical guess

      Delete
    3. I think that's a valid guess.

      Delete
    4. I agree it's a valid inference given Windsor most likely hasn't been taking and/or doesn't have access to his usual meds.

      Delete
    5. @10:27: "Windsor Breaks Down in Jail" and "Bill is at the breaking point" are not based on any facts. It is typical for the GENII to write what they WISH was the truth rather than the actual truth.

      Guesses and inferences are fine when identified as such, but that is not what they do here.

      Delete
    6. You obviously haven't read Bill's latest scribbled in jail motions. I think breakdown is a very acurate description.

      Delete
    7. My favorite one was filed yesterday. Bill crying his rights have been violated because his laptop has been seized as evidence. Sorry Bill, your "friend" that came to pick it up, isn't going to get to make all the damaging evidence in that laptop disappear.

      Delete
    8. Exactly. Susan doesn't bother herself with any type of research. She makes her ASSumption out of sheer spite and wanting so much to be right. Which is why she fails at every posting.

      Tomorrow will be another interesting day. She won't know any facts or relevant issues yet she'll pretend she does. LOL such a loser she is.

      Delete
    9. Anon 8:22, Second! I just read the court coordinator's letter to Barbara H. with Windsor's hand written motions. Did you note the hearing will take place tomorrow at the old courthouse? I was told the old courthouse doesn't have security. Is that a clue Windsor is not gong to attend?

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. My comment above at 8:07 was based entirely on THE HOPPER'S admission that his statements were based on nothing more than his "guess".

      @8:15: Are you a psychiatrist, a psychic, or maybe a handwriting expert? I assume you know the reason for the handwriting.

      Delete
    12. I wasn't worried about the reason for the handwriting. I was more focused on the actual words that were written. No need to be an expert to see they were the ramblings of a broken down vexatious idiot.

      Delete
    13. Have you seen his previous ramblings?

      Delete
    14. I've read all of his ramblings. The ones from jail take his craziness to an entirely new level.

      Delete
    15. You have read ALL OF HIS RAMBLINGS? He's on a new level?

      The word of an anon is not worth the paper it is not printed on, but I would not be surprised if you were right.

      Delete
    16. No need to take my worthless anon opinion on them. Feel free to read them yourself.

      Delete
    17. "The word of an anon is not worth the paper it is not printed on."

      This from Snoozan, the Anon...just like Windsor...she kicks her own fat ass every time she opens her ugly pie hole.

      Delete
    18. "Feel free to read them yourself."

      The players have better access to the cards than those of us that only observe.

      Delete
    19. windsor is a man who is used to a lavish lifestyle and is paranoid and has delusionary thoughts that the police will harm him while in Jail. While several of his supporters have said the same even furthing on this ideaolgy that he is being tortured. what a joke. I also note that I have heard and will know for sure after reading but he is asking a civil court judge to give a detainee which is what he is access to his personal laptop and other things in jail. Is this so he can do legal work or so he can give susan and others updates. What another joke.

      Delete
  9. "Vic Fedorov For instance, if he was hauled off before his hearing started, then this kidnapping was done to prevent the due process of the court hearing and directly benefited the defendants of the texas hearing, aka the joeys. If he was jailed on warrants after the hearing, it still is a force against the due process that would show violations upon bill by the joeys that need reparations. Now there are two flaws with our judiciary that show up clearly here. The first is the bottom line of justice is to cease the injustice. This involves talking; why is this conflict ocurring. How can we remedy it. Then comes the assumption the government is the biggest player and has the strength to punish wrongdoers. When really we see directly here in this matter, the government is doing what the joeys want. Thus instead of an adversarial system, we need a communicating one. And, of course due process is denied routinely when and because due process reveals the stronger criminal side that is a network more powerful than the judge and law enforcement. How can you have due process when due process here would reveal or start to reveal a huge conspiracy against Bill and others that is protected by government here and before. These are logical conclusions.
    Edited · 6 hours ago"


    Shit. We've been made!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL!! OMG!! How these morons come up with this stuff is beyond me!

      How is it a "conspiracy" that Windsor loaded his tankass into his stalker jeep, drove to Montana, stalked, earned a PPO, wrote that it was "Void" and ignored it entirely--thus violating it? Ending up with warrants to bring his tankass back to MT to stand before a Judge and explain himself? I just don't get it.

      Delete
    2. Tankass ©
      Bwahahahahahahaha!

      Dontchya know that Jeep is so glad to be parked?
      #TANKASS © bwahahahahahahaha

      Delete
  10. Somebody give Mary some PTFD, even "Master" is going to see that rambling as too much attention to herself and not enough attention to his current woe. Be careful Mary, that's a fine line there. Lololol.

    ~Allie Gate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MaryD is getting way on out yonder today!
      She's now added something 'sexual' to her violation rhetoric! Yack!
      Mary D is a dandy example of how some of that 4 letter word *work*, might do her a world of good. She is capable of typing a mile a minute or at the very least copying & pasting like a fiend.
      I'm sure her spewing about ticks & Lyme's ALL the time would limit her employment opportunities. I mean, daaaayum, there is only so much anyone can take. Is there a duct tape factory up there? That might need a speedy typist?
      The nuck futz are absolutely eat slap ass with the dumb shititis.
      Vic!!! Dude!! The hearing was held last week! Hello! Bill ain't slowed down whooping out hand written motions since then! Your Windy leader is FINE. He's still doing what he does best, killing trees via paper waste!

      9 am tomorrow & we can all see William Windsor in court!
      JeezaLou! Breathe people. It's Ellis County jail, not a Nazi concentration camp! He's a big ol boy, he'll be ok. Or as ok as he ever was!

      MaryD? Sit down. Take a breather. Have a V8. Hell, take a nap.

      Delete
    2. Mary's planning a TICKer tape parade for her messiah (with real ticks).

      Delete
  11. I've done some studying on Crystal Cox. She's become kind of famous in a way that no one wants to be famous. Amongst all Windsor's gigabytes of bullshit, I can't find where he renounced her. Surely he finally did, didn't he?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never seen it if he did. I have heard she's still very much behind the scenes with Windsor and since she has dedicated so much time and effort of republishing all of Windsor's articles about Boushie on her numerous websites, it kind of seems they are in this together to harass Boushie and his family.

      Delete
    2. Uh, no. Cox & Bill are mighty big buddies.
      The State of Montana has Windsor's computers, for evidence. Won't that be fun?
      I betchya there's some really interesting things on those devices!

      #BuckleUpButtercups

      Maybe #Snapaplooza should be a destination event? Montana should be lovely in the spring! I'd be #delighted to attend!

      Delete
    3. They worked together for awhile,(yes I witnessed) to stalk Boushie. Then Cox said she disagreed with him (something defaming, he said about one of her online friends and ampp) and poof they were overnight enemies. Then it only lasted (can't remember if it was days or weeks) a short time, and Cox made a public "I disagree with 'this' but I support his crusade" statement. Then they were sort of agreeing to disagree but got along for the sole purpose of getting that "evil Boushie". Then I left completely so I'm not sure after that, but for months after I left they "sorta kinda tolerated" each other for the "greater cause" on some of her many accounts. ~~sorry for all the quotation marks, it's just hard to type about this crap without rolling my eyes and using quotation marks to signify sarcasm~~

      ~Allie Gate

      Delete
    4. Thank you. As for Sean Boushie, I think he wrote some stuff, here for instance, and ended up wishing very dearly that he hadn't. As for the really rank stuff including most of the emails to Windsor, I don't think he wrote or sent that. That's just a guess and maybe one I've probably no right to make. It does fit a lot of facts. I'd guess Cox wrote and sent a lot of that stuff.

      I'll also guess that he provided Montana authorities with the truth about all that and that they had the means to verify at least some of it. I'll guess that when he saw himself in one of Windsor's "sting" videos Boushie finally said enough is enough. He finally figured that he had no right to expose his family and co-workers to danger. Bit of unauthorized psychoanalysis there, but again it fits the facts.

      I'm just projecting upon Sean Boushie how I would feel after seeing myself in that video. I would feel sick, not about putting myself in danger, but putting my family and co-workers in danger. I got this impression from listening to the U of MT police officer read the protection order to Bill. It clearly mentions Boushie's family and the University. I don't think it mentions Sean. He might have later been added to the order or there might have been another order.

      Someone else here noted that Bill had to be dreaming to don a bullet-proof vest and do what he did *at* a University - a school. Doing that showed some measure of delusion. Windsor thinking there was nothing outrageous about it, to the extent that he would call the police to come observe him doing it, that's the specific mental illness part. That's the dangerous part. If I were in Boushie's shoes, that's the part that would make me vomit.

      Sorry ( I really do apologize) about writing so much here. Just relating why I'm interested in the Cox / Windsor relationship.

      Delete
    5. "and maybe one I've probably no right to make"

      Behold the college-trained writer! Sometimes I amaze myself with how poorly I write.

      Delete
    6. As an interesting connection about how Windsor flooded the WWW with HIS twisted version of events (trying to find credible sources that are written by someone other than himself is almost impossible) Cox has the same nasty habits. Lynn Maris over on Windsors FB, quoted a portion of Cox's lies, from one of the numerous Cox blogs. It's laughable that Lynn, is so stupid, and can't see that Cox wrote it, clearly for spin. I have to wonder why Lynn doesn't find the court actual documents to read for any of this stuff.

      Delete
  12. "Julia Fletcher "Second, stalking is defined as purposely or knowingly causing another
    person substantial emotional distress or reasonable apprehension of bodily injury or death by repeatedly (a) following the stalked person, which did not occur here, or (b) harassing, threatening, or intimidating the stalked person, in person or by mail, electronic communication, or any other action, device, or method. Section 45-5-220(1), MCA. "

    Does anyone know the names of the individuals in Montana who chose to ignore the 300+ pages of evidence Bill presented?

    http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/.../Memorandum%20..."

    Get up-to-speed, Julie Fletcher. Windsor is a stalker and his 300+ pages of "evidence" is bullcrap. Read it. It's like the Exhibits he files in all of his worthless, vexi cases. Pointless and large cushion fillers of paper padding. Dah

    ReplyDelete
  13. Susan 7:59 PM -- I've been here for over a week and it has been a week wherein I've had a lot of free time (waiting on an actual dirt and metal project to start) so I've been studying "facts" 4 or 5 hours per day (I don't watch television). In that time, I've read an awful lot of stuff written by one Bill Windsor and watched an awful lot of Windsor video. Here's a fact for you: after (conservatively) 40 hours of this, I've seen maybe 1/4 of 1% of what is out there. Maybe 1/40th of 1%. There's is an awful lot written by Bill Windsor on this internet and every bit of it is delusional.

    So that one fact allows me to hold some opinions and see some real trends. Before all this, I was not aware that people did things like Google Poisoning, as practiced by Crystal Cox. Then, after reading what she did, I see that Bill Windsor has used her as an operations manual - he does the exact same things, save the outright extortion for money. He also does stuff she didn't, like travel to other states to stalk others. Don't say it wasn't stalking. What Windsor did serves as a pretty good definition of stalking.

    So yes, I'm new here. But don't talk to me like I haven't done my homework. I've found lots of people in Ellis County Lockup more innocent than Bill Windsor. They lock people up for driving without a license and having a bit of marijuana in their glove box. The amount of bond he's been assigned is actually pretty low for what he's accused of. So your saying he's in jail for nothing -- do you take me for stupid?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I need to amend this to say every bit of what I've SEEN on the internet of Windsor's writing is delusional. I've already said that is a tiny fraction of a % of what is out there, so I've no grounds to say that ALL of it is delusional.

      There's probably some lucid thoughts somewhere there.

      Delete
    2. "So your saying he's in jail for nothing -- do you take me for stupid?"

      I didn't take you for stupid before but this question ^ causes me to wonder.

      I have offered no opinion at all on the merits of the charges. Not a word.

      "Before all this, I was not aware that people did things like Google Poisoning, as practiced by Crystal Cox."

      In other words you are completely ignorant of the kind of warfare that takes place on the internet. You have never been the victim of someone like Cox or of people like the GENII. You've never been unmercifully harassed by a group of strangers that discovered your web site when you unknowingly crossed paths with someone they were obsessing about. You've never had such a group turn their obsession to you, making it their goal to destroy your publicly stated mission as well as every aspect of your personal life.

      You've never had a group pursue that goal by uncovering every single bit of information they can find about you and discussing their version of that information endlessly on line. You haven't had total strangers discuss the identities and locations of your children and grandchildren on the internet or publicly speculate about the bloodlines of one of those grandchildren. You've probably never had anyone attack you by making constant defamatory statements about your wife and your son.

      Has anyone ever made a FB page in your father's name using a picture of your dead father in his coffin as the profile picture and then posted disparaging comments about you as your dead father? Has anyone published cartoons of your dead parents having sex (my memory is fuzzy on this one)?

      I doubt anyone has ever "set you up" by sending you an email falsely claiming to be the mother of a teenager you met and informing you that the kid committed suicide.

      Has anyone ever constantly posted that they have spoken to the FBI, the IRS, Homeland Security, etc.and that all of these agencies are investigating you and it won't be long until you get a "surprise" from them?

      If you have ever mentioned that you have an upcoming meeting with a new contact, has anyone ever emailed or called that person to destroy any chance you have of working with him?

      Have you ever arranged a weekend conference and had people try to sabotage that event by "warning" the conference venue, the local police, the newspaper, etc. that you are a coming to their area?

      Has anyone ever made you the subject of a two -year long on line discussion where the "facts" they discuss about you are frequently false? Has anyone ever publicly insisted you are a member of a certain political group in spite of your endless denials of any such membership? Have people publicly, relentlessly, reported that you are a terrorist?

      Do you have any idea of the things Boushie did to provoke that confrontation with BW? Do you know how many efforts BW made to get the police or even Boushie's employer to intervene?

      I could go on and on but I suppose you get the point. There is NO INNOCENT victim in this war. I have been watching Windsor since 2011. I have closely observed the GENII's outrageous, unfettered harassment and systematic efforts to destroy Windsor's life since it began.

      The litigation against these people did not begin until their actions HAD destroyed LA (they publicly took credit for that and stated that it HAD been their goal) and it was clear that Windsor could not freely pursue anything else in life until he found a way to stop these people.

      The GENII's actions are blatantly malicious and they believe they are free to "destroy" any individual they choose. So far, they appear to be correct. When they are through with Windsor they will choose another target. They see themselves as self-appointed internet police.Not that THEY are delusional at all.

      Delete
    3. "to destroy Windsor's life since it began."

      Should be, "to destroy Windsor's life, since it began."

      Delete
    4. has it ever occurred to you that this is just a blog? Nothing more, nothing less

      Delete
    5. Has it ever occurred to you that a blog can make a difference in someone else's life? Sure it has, because you have PUBLICLY STATED that it is your intention to do so.

      Has it occurred to you that the people on this blog do not limit their actions to writing here but instead they take matters into their own hands and interfere directly in their target's life?

      Delete
    6. Spoken like a true die hard lemming. I bet he's never had his kids photographed at the bus stop. Had pictures of his and his family's homes posted on the Internet. Had someone request his deranged criminal followers hunt you down. Interfered in your child custody case. This list could go on for ever but, bottom line, your Willy deserves everything he's now got coming. And so do you SUSAN. I for one, hope you become the blogs next target.

      Delete
    7. "I bet he's never ... Had pictures of his and his family's homes posted on the Internet."

      You would lose that bet.

      Delete
    8. yes, I wanted to expose the fraudulent scam that was Lawless America for anyone to see. Did I stop him from producing his fake movie? Of course not, he never tried....it was a scam all along. The only thing you can blame me for is telling the truth....and the truth for Bill hurts

      Delete
    9. The only pictures of Windsor's homes posted on the Internet were posted there by him. I know you're just venting because your last great vexi hope is gone. Please try to get over it. Windsor was and still is his own worst enemy. Just like all of you vexi asshats are. Toodles Suzy.

      Delete
    10. YOU decided the movie was a scam and set about convincing others of that fact. You have no proof it was a scam, you have no idea what BW's INTENT was, you only have your self-serving assumptions.

      You publicize your self-serving assumptions as if they are verified truth. Therein lies only ONE of the problems with this blog.

      Delete
    11. ummm I'm not really sure how any of my assumptions are self serving. Could you please provide proof of that crazy accusation? If you can't prove your insane opinion then you must ban all your speech from the internet.....oh wait, its still America. You terrorist haven't won. I, you, anyone else is free to spout off on any opinion and topic they wish.

      Thats the difference between me, you and Bill. I love America, you and Bill hate it because you cant control other people's opinions

      Delete
    12. Oh my, this Susan woman seems to really be in psycho spin mode .... I hope she can get the help she so desperately needs.

      Delete
    13. Sharon if you feel so strongly about this, then it is a wonder that you have not made yourself an official party to Windsor's case, rather than the covert rat we know you to be. And anyone can google what you have posted yourself of what you claim to be are your many medical ailments to see why you would never make a credible witness in court.

      Delete
    14. Susan here's the deal Windsor and his group to Include yourself are the losers of what would say a large political movement that has failed and will fail in the future. Whether it is with bill Windsor or John Darash common law grand juries and or taking back your county via juries is a delusional idea and the only way you and your movement can change the laws and the way America can do business is by an armed civil war. Good luck with that. Peaceful revolution, pffft. Time to move on to something else Susan.

      Delete
    15. ~~Has anyone ever constantly posted that they have spoken to the FBI, the IRS, Homeland Security, etc.and that all of these agencies are investigating you and it won't be long until you get a "surprise" from them? ~~

      Matter of fact, yes. Throw in the CIA as well. You know what I did? I ignored them, just as I would have if they'd claimed Venusians were looking to booger my cat.

      As for the rest of that melodramatic display, you M'am, are nuts.

      As for Bill's "movie," I saw where he talked like it was meant to be an actual box office movie, like Michael Moore's stuff (which I won't judge except to say that they were financially successful and to some extent, politically so). Pretty obvious you're not going to fit thousands of interviews into an 80 minute movie. And let's look at those interviews. Bill was his own sound man and it showed. Either you can't understand the person being interviewed or you can't hear what questions Windsor is asking. A real documentary filmmaker would invest in a $180 mixer, a $110 compressor and a couple of serviceable but inexpensive mics. It was never going to be a movie because technically it was a very poorly executed joke.

      And there's no excuse for that shit. There's hundreds of absolutely free film tutorials online. All you need is the basics of sound and video. Bill had lights and a pretty good camera but obviously wasn't interested in learning how to use them. Again, the sound, overwhelmingly important in a documentary like that was atrocious.

      I know it wasn't meant to be in the movie, but I haven't laughed so hard in ages as I did when Bill was moving his rig, tripod, camera and all down that sidewalk on the U of MT campus. It just goes on and on and on. *thump* *smack* *thump* *smack* *thump* *smack* *thump* *smack*.... Hilarious.

      Delete
    16. HOPPER, the term "self-serving assumption" is CLEARLY opinion because it cannot be proven true or false, since "self-serving" is subjective. I hope that helps, but I know it won't, lol.

      @ 2:04: What is covert? I have been pretty open about the fact that I support Willy's claims against you.

      @2:11: I am not part of LA or any other activist group. I don't know what you are referring to as a "large political movement". I have at all times been openly critical of the insane grand jury scheme and any other plan LA has suggested.

      Sorry but my interest in your little war is not about me endorsing LA. It is about my belief that whether their ideas are right or wrong, they have a right to pursue any legal activity.

      The GENII have a right to criticize LA and to dissuade others from participating in the group. However there are limits as to how the GENII may go about that task and I believe those limits have been exceeded many, many times.

      There are opponents and then there are vigilantes. I don't condone vigilantism.

      Delete
    17. But this is all a game, right Susan? Thanks for playing!

      Delete
    18. "It is about my belief that whether their ideas are right or wrong, they have a right to pursue any legal activity."

      This blog has never once done anything to stop them, other than commenting about their pursuits on this blog.

      Delete
    19. @3:03: It is your prerogative to ignore things that others do to you, but that does not mean everyone else can or must do the same.

      What does your critique of BW's film making skills have to do with anything?

      Delete
    20. @3:13: The litigation IS A GAME as ALL litigation is. Enjoy!

      HOPPER: In my view "This blog" is nothing but software and "it" has never done anything at all.

      There is no point in us debating what the people here have and have not done.

      Delete
    21. there is no point in you being here....just go back and wait for your willy to update you

      Delete
    22. Here. It's near the end of the video. Skip ahead to 1:28:10. http://youtu.be/mGcoR2usulQ?list=UUhwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQ

      I laughed so hard I hyperventilated. If this were bad film-making satire, it would have been successful if shown at one of the bars in Park City during Sundance.

      Delete
    23. ~~ What does your critique of BW's film making skills have to do with anything? ~~

      You answered your own question.

      ~~ YOU decided the movie was a scam and set about convincing others of that fact. You have no proof it was a scam ~~

      It was a scam because the product wasn't capable of becoming a movie, gathering funding, any of that. Bill continually said if he could just win a lawsuits he'd have time to make the movie successful. That's fraud. Bill claimed he was a film-maker. That's fraud. That he was a director. Fraud. Whether or not he suspected the material he filmed would never amount to anything isn't relevant. He was selling himself as having skills and experience he never had. Fraud.

      Delete
    24. #1 Wrong Building entirely.
      #2, The poor guy in the orange shirt at 1:07. So not Booshie. Its some poor contractor. Believe me, I know what Booshie looks like, that aint him. I even know where he was when Windsor was filming this fiasco.

      Delete
    25. ~~~ I laughed so hard I hyperventilated. If this were bad film-making satire, it would have been successful if shown at one of the bars in Park City during Sundance. ~~~

      I mean just the part of him moving his equipment down the sidewalk. World class funny.

      Delete
    26. ~~~ It is your prerogative to ignore things that others do to you, but that does not mean everyone else can or must do the same. ~~~

      Everyone else cannot clog the courts with ridiculous lawsuits. So yes, there are things they're required to ignore. Running a court of law is very expensive. Bill was wasting taxpayer money just as if he was running around setting off fire alarms. Don't get me wrong. I'm no tax protester. I don't mind in the least paying taxes and in fact wouldn't mind them being a little higher. But the kind of obscene waste Windsor causes? I have a right to object to that regardless of what you say. I, and civilization do demand that people ignore some things.

      Delete
    27. https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRzXEf3--QRcpdEky8kXtcUXLm5nXKtiUOHwRjif1in5NK8mOY-xA

      Delete
    28. "Everyone else cannot clog the courts with ridiculous lawsuits. So yes, there are things they're required to ignore."

      Of course. And then there are things that do in fact meet the definition of tortious activity, which civilization has decided no one should have to endure or ingnore.

      If you don't like where "civilization" has drawn the lines then you'll have to change the law.

      Obviously when someone who does not understand the law attempts to represent himself it causes problems for the courts and society. Does that mean he should not be protected from the tortious activities of others?

      Delete
    29. So who's gonna protect him then? You?

      Delete
    30. ~~~ Obviously when someone who does not understand the law attempts to represent himself it causes problems for the courts and society. Does that mean he should not be protected from the tortious activities of others? ~~~

      How many legal actions has he started against how many people? He's wasting the time of public servants and the money of taxpayers because there aren't any tortious activities of others. Does society let him continue with ten more lawsuits because there's a slight chance he'll prevail in one of them sooner or later? Even if the answer to that *was* yes, it isn't now. If Bill does anything beyond apologize and admit he was wrong, he's going to prison. There's a good possibility he can deal his way out of the felony charges but to do that he needs to completely forget about every single civil action presently active. He needs to drop them completely. Do you doubt that?

      You seem to know him pretty well. Is he capable of leaving all that behind? Dropping all of it? Staying off the internet? It's that or prison for him now. I'm not going to debate whether that's right or wrong as I suspect it's some of both. Only question now is, is he capable of doing the things necessary to stay out of prison?

      Delete
    31. "If Bill does anything beyond apologize and admit he was wrong, he's going to prison."

      Is that a provable fact or based on assumption?

      Delete
    32. Before anyone states what Bill must do to stay out of prison, you better wait until all the facts of his crimes comes out. For instance, Bill claims his violation stems from serving Sean with court documents. The fact is, the arrest warrant states much different reasons for the charges. But, in my opinion, Bill can't continue his civil mess at this point. He better focus all of his energy and resources on avoiding prison. That, to me, would be far more important than his lawsuit over Internet butthurt.

      Delete
    33. ~~~ Is that a provable fact or based on assumption? ~~~

      Of course it's provable. If he maintains all his conspiracy theory crap and goes to prison, that makes it fact, yes?

      Delete
  14. This morning Bill walks into court without a lawyer, a family, his notes, his laptop, his beard, his clothes. He wasn't allowed to psych himself up by playing with his lemmings. In short, all his coping mechanisms have been taken away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You forgot the part where he gets strip searched on his way to court.
      He'll get strip searched on his way back from court, too. Squat, cough, spread cheeks, whole 9 yards.
      Seurity measures.
      Awwww. Sad huh?
      Yeah, me neither.
      I'm Judy going to have more coffee & a hot shower.

      Delete
    2. Sorry Judy *just*. More coffee please!

      Delete
    3. Except that when he coughs, contraband pops out...

      Delete
    4. Will Special Agent Prehn be there with all his nationwide media peeps & celebrity friends like, Ellen, Grizzly Adams ... Betty White etc ... ?

      Delete
    5. No. Marty had a top secret emergency wiper blade delivery he had to do for the DOD.

      Delete
    6. Marty was seen running down the street from a bucket of warm water and soap when you smell you need to spray off with a garden hose once a week ....and thats special Agent pig pin when him and schied entered the court room my first though was Laurel & Harty has arrived

      Delete
    7. "Except that when he coughs, contraband pops out..."

      Ah! That explains why his butt looks like a laptop.

      Delete
  15. What's up in Court today?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it starts at 9, I guess he is going to be there

      Delete
    2. david schied needs to be right next to him he is a shit bag as well

      Delete
    3. If I had known that he was going to be in Court this morning, I would have made arrangements to have been there so have seen him sans his usual fanfare, mountains of paperwork, etc. This is so delightful to know that bully Bill is facing consequences!!!

      Delete
  16. All right—once again, I hope folks who were in court this morning can fill the rest of us in on what took place there!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hearing started at 10:00. Bill is present, complete with shackles and jumpsuit.

      Delete
    2. Early reports seem to indicate Bill is taking a court beat down.

      Delete
    3. The "Dispatches From The Front" format is amusing. :-)

      Delete
    4. Court has taken a break for lunch. Reports say the nacho plate at Nino's is great. It's believed Bill is having a bologna sandwich with kool aid.

      Delete
    5. So dish, folks! What happened?

      Delete
    6. Goodness—at almost 6 P.M. East Texas time? Glad I don't work for that judge....

      Delete
    7. Bottom line for today: He's a limited purpose public figure, no emergency stay while he's in jail, Sean has to answer admissions, and anti slapp hearing is the 20th.

      Delete
    8. Interesting; thanks.

      The more pressing question, of course, is extradition to (or perhaps bail in) Montana—but of course that wouldn't have been substantively addressed in the civil-court hearing.

      Delete
    9. "Sean has to answer admissions"

      What are admissions?

      Delete
    10. Bill said today that he was fighting extradition. In true bill form.

      Admissions are questions like did you say such and such

      Delete
    11. Just wondering how Sean finds out he has to answer admissions. Are the Texas and Montana courts at odds?

      Delete
    12. Sorry. Sean Fleming has to answer not Sean Boushie.

      Delete
    13. Admissions: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/requests_for_admission
      (There's a typo in that entry: it says "simply" when it means "simplify.")

      Just wondering how Sean finds out he has to answer admissions.

      It's a good question. If Windsor serving Boushie with legal process violates the protective order, there could be real problems with any discovery procedure.

      Conceivably the Texas court itself could notify Boushie that he is expected to answer Windsor's Requests for Admissions, which would solve at least part of the problem, probably without violating the protective order.

      Meanwhile, an anonymous commenter upthread (posting at November 6 at 5:45 P.M.) attests to knowledge of the arrest warrant, and (s)he has asserted that some or all (it's unclear) of the PO violations Windsor has been charged with do not stem from serving Boushie with legal process. So who knows?

      Delete
    14. The admissions are for Sean Fleming anti slapp hearing the 20th. And I have a copy of the arrest affidavit and the charges do not stem from Bill serving Sean Boushie legal documents from the Texas suit.

      Delete
    15. Flemming, not Boushie, has to answer admissions.

      Delete
    16. Wow, so this does warrant does not stem from serving Sean Boushie? I thought this emergency stay clearly asked the court not to serve Sean Boushie ... a bit misleading or no?

      If Windsor is going to fight extradition I presume there is no set time for MT to pick him up because the hearing comes first. I thought Windsor had signed for extradition (not sure where I got that from).

      Delete
    17. MT, no-- the warrant which put Windsor in Ellis Co. jail is out of MT and involves Windsor's violation of Sean Boushie's TOP. The admissions order from Carroll involves Sean Fleming.


      Delete
    18. I think MT is talking about Windsor's hand written stay request for TX in which he did say something like the reason he was in jail (ie the warrant) was for serving Boushie with court documents for TX.
      Total LIE!

      Delete
    19. Yes, the handwritten request for a stay mentions that the court (in Ellis, TX) not serve Boushie. I took that to mean if Boushie was served, Windsor would be in additional trouble regarding the MT TOP. Ah, it was a total lie. Hmm. figures.

      Thanks!

      Delete
    20. Well, it appears the lie was that in the warrant, it does not say anything about the TX case service. That doesn't mean he won't be charged later with that as well, it just means he lied to the court, when he said " the plaintiff may be facing the rest of his life in prison for providing defendant Sean Boushie with service copies of documents filed in this case. Then he followed that up with a "don't serve Boushie" to kind of try and make his lie more believable.

      Everything gets confusing and convoluted with Windsor. There are so many inconsistencies, fabrications, falsehoods and out right lies it's just too much to try and remember them all.

      Delete
    21. How can Windsor face the court, much less face a mirror (hmm, no mirrors to sneak up in jail, huh). Did the judge catch his lie or was the stay dismissed and the lie flushed along with the dismissal :/

      I do take it that Windsor is in some pretty deep trouble back in MT and he does face an extradition hearing in TX and that he did not already have this hearing and signed or waived extradition. I previously thought Windsor waived extradition with the bond statement in the disposition note. Okay, no ten days (scratch that). If he signed (or does sign) the waiver, it's ten days from the signing of the waiver. He's going to sit tight. MT does extradite and Texas is not going to fight to hold him far as I know. This process dragged out to the max can take up to 90 days (and not from the booking hour).




      Delete
    22. I have a copy of the warrant from MT, and while it's true the warrant doesn't mention Ellis Co. service docs, it's what the complaint is about, so I can't say it's a lie on Windsor's part (especially in light of the huge whoppers he has told). I think this a confusion between a general category versus a particular offense; for example, the warrant is for a traffic violation but Windsor claims it's because he ran a red light. Make sense?

      Delete
    23. Re-posting these PDFs FYI:

      http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0540%20Other%20--%20Motion%20-%20Opposed?id=%7B93C0E349-73D5-4689-9AEF-771827085324%7D

      http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0540%20Deny%20--%20Order?id=%7B5DC47725-D7E2-4CDC-9330-36CA81F600B7%7D

      Delete
    24. Whoa! Red light. 3 felonies, 2 misdemeanors.

      Let me go out and purchase some popcorn for this one.

      Delete
    25. Midnight_Train (the "MT" abbreviation, which I've used as well, is a little confusing given that it's also the postal abbreviation for Montana—is that intentional?):

      Have you read the comment, from one or two Joey threads ago, in which a commenter going by "Second-Chair Attorney" researched Montana law regarding protective orders? According to that research, the first two violations of a Montana protective order are charged as misdemeanors, and then each subsequent violation becomes a felony. It's a "three strikes, you're out"-style policy.

      That, it would appear, is how Windsor got the charges he has received. It's not, as I initially presumed, that he committed two minor and three major violations of the protective order. Instead, three felonies + two misdemeanors implies nothing more than that he's being charged with five violations of the protective order, with no indication as to their severity.

      Delete
    26. Midnight_Train is a long-standing pen-name.

      No, I missed the "Second-Chair Attorney" posts (will go back and read in the morning). I need to go back through the past two threads to see what I've missed before continuing. I like that three-strikes you're out policy for PPO violations, though. Makes sense, now.

      Delete
  17. Is this an extradition hearing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this is a hearing on his frivolous lawsuit in TX

      Delete
  18. So what happened at today's hearing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Scroll up and read all about it n

      Delete
    2. is it possible that Allie Gate and Curtis are cut from the same rug, is it

      Delete
    3. Those admissions/Discovery?
      Those require that Flemming must explain how each on is protected by free speech.
      (Even the Sarah Crocker ones).
      There are approximately 1,000 admissions
      I heard a great analogy for Flemming: "not a lot of difference between Flemming and Windsor, different tax bracket & generation"

      Delete
    4. Those admissions/Discovery?
      Those require that Flemming must explain how each on is protected by free speech.


      That's at least slightly confusing. Requests for Admissions can't require the recipient to "explain" anything. By their nature, they can only ask binary (basically yes/no) questions. If a party seeking discovery wants another party to explain something, she's required to use interrogatories and/or depositions. Is Mr. Fleming being ordered to answer some of those as well? (That seems possible—but I can't imagine that Windsor would be permitted to force Mr. Fleming to answer "approximately 1,000" interrogatories, or questions during a deposition.)

      I heard a great analogy for Flemming: "not a lot of difference between Flemming and Windsor, different tax bracket & generation"

      Come on, now. Mr. Fleming has not, to my knowledge, been declared a vexatious litigant by numerous courts in several states. And, unless I remember incorrectly, Mr. Fleming is the Windsor target responsible for hiring the talented attorney ("Barbara H.," yes?) who is credited, downthread, with beating Windsor badly at Thursday's hearing.

      Those seem to me to be meaningful distinctions.

      Delete
    5. Fleming didn't hire his attorney, GEICO did under his homeowners policy.

      Delete
  19. Hello!!!
    I went to court!
    Poor Wittle Willy! 'Cough, cough!' He went into GREAT detail to tell the Judge how sick he was! "The jail is so cold! He's chilled, & has this awful cough, 'cough, cough, cough!' :) Then? Willy has & I quote "raging diarrheal"! The food is awful! It's loud, never gets dark, he hasn't slept, the doctor hasn't/won't see him, 'cough, cough'! His back hurts from sleeping on a metal bunk! (Go ahead, laugh! It is jail! Not Courtyard By Marriott! Raging diarrhea! #tmi) his cough didn't stop his long winded off topic of hearing 9+ minute speil, the Judge did! Because "much like Windsor's filings, it was repetitive, & had nothing to do with topic of hearing!
    Drumroll*****
    Judge Carroll read aloud ALL the documents Boushie has EVER sent the 40th District Court since January, in addition to ALL the Montana courts' rulings! ALOUD!
    Gasp! Windsor lied!
    The Judge mentioned that his observation after close review of Boushie's, in addition to to what Windsor had submitted since or has just told, as recently as last Tuesday? The Judge now believes that it is Windsor being so #Vexi and #vindictive was THE why Windsor chose Texas to include Boushie in his "largest case of defamation in the history of the world!"
    Then? The Judge asked Windsor why he chose Texas to go after Defendant Round? Could that also be the #vexi and #vindictive reason? "Oh no, Your Honor!" At this point, Windsor's face & neck were red as a fox's ass! He immediately went into the total #SovereignCitizen spin! "Montana AND Georgia are #CORRUPT"
    Windsor began prattling again, but his cough was HEALED! He leaned way back in his chair & from the gallery, all I could hear was what sounded like Charlie Brown's teacher, "blah, bleh, blather" (coughing still on hold! Amazing, I know)
    After several minutes of him line itemizing his 3rd Amended ______ (GAWD only knows, cough still forgotten, shocker!) I stood & apologized, but I simply could NOT hear, so I asked could Windsor speak into microphone? Better yet! They judge insists we sold all sit closer and all defendants were invited to move forward,
    I chose seat next to #SuperAttorneyBarb! Yay!
    Windsor was sworn in & gave some TREMENDOUS condtraticting of how he's never run for office, never ever self promoted himself as a leader of ANY political party, never published that was any of those! & much more "Just a retired Grandfather" & much more! (Stop gasping & just begin guffawing)
    Then? It was our turn to #cossexamine his #sworn testimony! And, did we ever!!
    It was impossible to deny his own words, on his own #FaceBook, Youtube videos, the Lawless.com! #Evidence to the contrary of what Windsor had just given "as the truth and nothing except the truth" were then read outloud & then entered as #exhibits!
    Woohoo!
    Let me just say that it was a great day for everyone, except Windsor!
    I'm exhausted! I'll finish up with recap early in the morning! *Im sleeping so well! I keep dozing off now!
    **spoiler**Windsor went back to ESCO jail & the rest of us? Saw the sunset, we'll see our homes, kids ect:)

    Huge thank you to Barbara H the attorney for her hard work for everyone!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BRAVO. A win for everyone :)

      Can someone please give the attorneys a hug from me and Ken? We cannot thank everyone enough here for stepping in to protect my confidential crime victim address.

      MUAH!
      Renee' Harrington - Michigan OIDV

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the report, Anon @12:52.

      Windsor was sworn in & gave some TREMENDOUS condtraticting of how he's never run for office, never ever self promoted himself as a leader of ANY political party, never published that was any of those! & much more....

      Then? It was our turn to #c[r]ossexamine his #sworn testimony! And, did we ever!!

      Okay—a thread or two ago (I believe it was on Halloween), I posted a whiny comment complaining that people (both Windsor and some of his detractors) were throwing the word "perjury" around too much. But the events described in the above report would quite possibly place Windsor at least one significant step closer to the actual "P" word. If he did indeed say things during courtroom testimony under oath that he knew were false, and did so with the intent of gaining an advantage in litigation, that does look a lot like perjury.

      Now, it still would require law enforcement (presumably the Ellis County district attorney) to decide to prosecute Windsor in order for that arguable perjury to actually stick as perjury, but if the transcript of the hearing looks the way Anon 12:52's report suggests it looks, that's not unthinkable.

      I'd say perjury charges are still unlikely, but who knows? Once again, it's really up to the prosecutor.

      Huge thank you to Barbara H the attorney for her hard work for everyone!

      In case my bias isn't obvious, I should probably cop to the fact that Barbara H., as well as Ms. Overstreet's counsel and any other member of my profession who does the important work of taking on vexatious abusers of court process, are the characters in this whole saga whom I'm rooting for the most. Attorneys, as a profession, take an enormous amount of garbage from a whole lot of people, and not all of the criticism is unjustified—but we also do a lot that we have every reason to be proud of. Good on Barbara (et al.) indeed. It sounds like she earned one of those "Perry Mason moments" that we litigators dream of having but almost never actually get, and I'm glad for her.

      Delete
    3. I'm pretty sure Barbara is my future wife. I just need to borrow Brannon's hammer to help me convince her of that fact!

      Delete
    4. Back away from Super Barb! I luff her guts so hard. If I can't marry her? She is my new BFF.
      Seriously though, BarbH is a hard working, down to earth, nice person! She is even kind & respectful to Windsor.
      BarbH was mighty fierce though and very fast thinking! I was sincerely in awe of her!

      Hi @Attorney! How you be?
      I asked about perjury a few times, only because dipshit Windsor ALWAYS claims "under oath".
      Yesterday? His © tankass ASKED to be sworn in! He still flat effing lied. I despise him. I did get a tad snippy & lippy, & I apologize to all those present and to BarbH for mouthing off loudly "He's under oath!"
      Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

      KMc

      Delete
  20. Too many Seans. A statistical anomaly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One more and it's a Monty Python skit.

      Delete
  21. Attorney at11:17 PM - which in a normal case, one where a defendant might be expected to behave him or herself, might mean the two felonies could be easily dealt away.

    I can't see Bill behaving himself. I could be wrong about that, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's about the way it looks to me, as well.

      Delete
  22. Is it the same Sean Flemming who posts stuff I never understand here? Like a few posts above this? Or is that a loose-relevance bot running on someone's server?

    (and when I say "server" I mean a computer, not someone who serves legal instruments)

    The English language really is horrible.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I guess a lot. It's fun. Let me guess regarding the wisdom of fighting extradition, or not fighting it. Strictly read, those court officers attempting extradition could not and would not view a defendant who fought extradition any differently than a defendant who did not. Those court officers would be objective.

    But humans are not only *not* objective, they are incapable of being objective. So as a delay tactic where the outcome is assured, fighting extradition might be unwise - like winding the spring that is set against you tighter.

    Bill said he was going to acquire counsel. I wonder what a competent (and one who kept the end game - ie, staying out of prison - in mind) attorney would say about fighting extradition?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "But humans are not only *not* objective, they are incapable of being objective."

      What? smh Where do you get this stuff?

      Delete
    2. I'll just watch while you win prizes for irony. Really. Don't mind me. Carry on.

      Delete
    3. Okay Susan, I'll play. This obviously goes to my opinion that Windsor's actions and attitude can influence how those two felonies are prosecuted and even *if* they will be prosecuted. You seem to think that Bill can carry on, no problem. That the things he does in civil court in addition to fighting extradition etc will have no bearing on whether or not he goes to prison.

      Fine. I hope he listens to you instead of me. I'm here for entertainment. Those felonies being thrown away or dealt away would be less entertaining than them being prosecuted. Matter of fact, I hope Windsor chooses you to defend him instead of a criminal defense attorney. That would be epic.

      Delete
    4. ~~~ What? smh Where do you get this stuff? ~~~

      Objective vs Subjective is at once a philosophical and a nuts and bolts courtroom issue. In both areas, the vast majority of people agree with me. So you syh!

      Question: what do jury consultants look at? Why are they hired? Because people are generally objective? Nopers. They're hired precisely because people are not.

      Delete
    5. Yup, Bill said several times he's hired an attorney. Which kinda whacked his begging for his computers while In jail. The 'boss' of the jail told the judge that Bill can use the law library at the jail like everyone else, with their rules. Bill doesnt take 'no' or 'bad' news too well.
      His telling the deputies that he'd just stay in courtroom & work thru lunch? Bwahahaha, "no you're not! Get up! You're going back to the jail!" That? Was pretty funny. He had them confused for waiters:) Surely he'll get the hang of it eventually!

      Delete
    6. I forgot!!!
      Bill even mentioned Susan/Sharon in court! As an exhibit was read, he just HAD to explain who she is AND where she lives AND he chuckled as he described her to the Judge! We all chuckled, too:) Bill's description? Wasn't flattering, by the way. *chuckle* But, it was hilarious, "she thinks she's a legal expert, Your Honor, everyone just humors her, Bless her Heart". (In the south? Blessing her heart is code for 'what a dipshit' just can't say that here & now). That? *chuckle*

      Delete
    7. LMAO. I have wondered what Windsore would do if someone took his notes away. Now we know.

      Delete
    8. I find it very interesting Windsor would denounce any "Revolution" involvement. "Lawless America the Revolution", "The Revolutionary Party." "GRIP"-- all of it. What will the lemmings think now? He did take their pennies to join in. They supported the entire "cause" which was to bring light to their mission to change the Government. Who was he representing when he did his "State of the Union" address? Not to mention those who patted him on the back and supported his running for those "offices." SMH

      He just bailed on them completely--to me, this shows clear fraud and a con.

      Delete
  24. What? Daylight is brighter and night is darker? smh! Outrageous! Where do you get this stuff?

    (my Susan impression)

    ReplyDelete
  25. In that I'm the only person continuing to interact with Susan I wonder if she's just trying to keep me writing stuff, hoping I'll slip up and reveal which amongst a cast of hundreds of characters that have been involved with this online mess over the years. Or maybe she's just a troll. If the former, then that's funny.

    I was googling old girlfriends from 30-something years ago (as one does) and found this Windsor stuff completely by accident - found it interesting - so here I am. The old girlfriend was only very marginally involved with one of Bill's opponents and she has never been mentioned by name in any of this. If there are six degrees of separation, she's 4th or 5th degree, making me 6th. The google led me to a link which led me to a link which led me to a link, etc.

    I actually shouldn't even say that. I ought to lead Susan to think I'm having an affair with a judge's wife or something.

    I imagine Susan could just be bored. If that's the case, I can relate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She does have hobbies believe it or not.This is just how she relieves stress. She is a constant troll showing off because you are new. She did slip up, she's just too dumb to know how.

      Delete