I guess Bill should have seen this coming when he scrambled to sign up his Lawless America as a non-profit. Sean Fleming, you know from the Sean Fleming Show, has a great video explaining Bill's shenanigans between trying to play LLC and 501c3 non-profit corporation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd5ay2vXiVs&list=UUi_3bMXuLoFtRf3Od_HGVJg
Bill, as usual, is trying to play both sides of the coin. He registered Lawless America as a non-profit listing his wife as the Director. But non-profits are not allowed to engaged in the political arena as that is specifically reserved for that is called PACs (Political Action Committees). Beyond that though, both are to be set up with a committee and must track all donations and expenditures. As a non profit, LA could have paid Bill's expenses and a "salary" for running his fake movie, but that would have to have been approved by the Board of Directors with a full accounting of all revenue and expenses. As we know, Bill just took the donations and says he can't read when it comes time to file his taxes. So Lawless America, the non-profit, engaged in political activity without a PAC and took in donations with no appropriate BOD approval and accounting.
Saturday, March 8, 2014
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
For Windsor, Its Always Someone Else's Fault
As we continue to look at the mountains of documents filed in the Maid of the Mist case, and appeal, we see a clear pattern of a complete lack of personal responsibility from Bill. The judges are mean to me, I'm just a pro se litigant, the housing bubble popped and took all my money. But what really drives Bill over the edge is when a judge uses a word that perfect describes his actions.
114. Judge Duffey even branded me as a “litigious plaintiff” in the order dated July 30, 2009 (attached hereto as Exhibit 2). “Litigious” is identified as “tending to engage in lawsuits.” (Exhibit 3 hereto.) A “litigious plaintiff” is a person who tends to file lawsuits.” Judge Duffey has no basis to say that. He would have no idea what I have and haven’t been involved with in terms of litigation unless he has false information obtained from some extra-judicial source. Other than Maid of the Mist’s totally improper lawsuit against me, the only lawsuits that I have been involved with personally for the last 15+ years were two legal actions involving real estate (one was an eviction in which my wife and I prevailed but never got paid, and the other was a small claims lawsuit by an attorney trying to buy our home that was dismissed because it was improper under the law). A third lawsuit was filed against me in California by a National Park Service employee who claimed his photograph taken by me at a National Park while he was on duty should not have been used on my personal travel web site. My insurance carrier paid the man $1,000 to go away. My 15-year history as what Judge Duffey describes as a “litigious plaintiff” is that my wife and I sued some people who bounced their rent checks on our unsold Ohio residence, stiffed us for $30,000 or so, and refused to vacate. Contrary to Judge Duffey’s presentation in the order dated July 30, 2009, that I am involved in “three cases,” the truth is that I am involved with one issue: Maid of the Mist and their attorneys. Maid sued me wrongfully. I have sued Maid. 115. The “litigious plaintiff” case that Judge Duffey cites in his order is Martin-Trigona v. Shaw, a case in which a litigant had filed over 250 lawsuits and used litigation as a cruel and effective weapon against his enemies, who are more often imagined than real. Trigona has reportedly sued literally hundreds, if not thousands, of attorneys, judges, their spouses, court officials, and other human beings. His lawsuits have been pursued with "persistence, viciousness, and general disregard for decency and logic." He has used legal pleadings to ventilate his contempt and hatred of persons of Jewish heritage and to level accusations which "have often been personal, have often emphasized racial or religious affiliations, and have often involved the members of ... judges' and counsel's families." The purpose, nature and effect of his resort to multiple litigation has been to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible.
Judge Duffy hit the nail on the head, and Bill objected http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx32b5igLwA. He then selectively choose 15 years because more than that would definitely prove the Judge's point. But what is particularly amazing is how Bill has an out of body experience as he characterizes the Trigona case as something far different than what he is doing. Unlike Bill, Trigona filed tons of lawsuits as a cruel weapon against his enemies, many of which are imagined. This monster even included "judges, court officials, their spouses and other human beings in an effort to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible". Right, and we can all see how this Trigona monster differs from what Bill is doing?
Monday, March 3, 2014
Windsor Can't Read During Tax Season
This is going to be a series as we look into Bill's past filings, particularly in Georgia civil action 1:11-CV-01922-TWT and the second amended notice of appeal. In this filing, we get a pretty good look at all the financial failures, as Bill tells it, that Windsor has been involved in over the past 30 years. As usual, its everyone else's fault but Bill's that his financial endeavours have been a disaster. In this filing, Bill tries to claim a negative net worth of almost $1,000,000 while owning two homes worth about $2,000,000 total and having an investment account with Wachovia for over $1,000,000.
Even back in 2011, Bill was playing all kinds of financial games through his wife Barbara as they tried to hide assets from the looming judgement they were about to receive in the Maid of the Mist case. Bill even shows what kind of game he is playing when he says "there is no law to make a spouse liable to use her separate property to pay for debts of her husband". The District Court even pointed this out by saying that the Windsor's financial affairs were convoluted. Then, Bill uses his son Ryan to come up with a $1,000,000 "loan" Bill says he owes to Ryan and Alcatraz for the legal fees in the Maid of the Mist case with a wink and a nod.
Then we have the problem with his taxes. As we learned in Bill's divorce filing last year, he had not filed a tax return since 2009. But in this court document we get a little more info on what he did in 09. Bill says, and I quote: "The 2009 tax return is inaccurate. It was submitted when Windsor was unable to read. It will be amended when time and reading permit. The 2010 return is on extension due to the same factors."
You see Judge, I suffer from a very rare condition. Every spring, up till April 15th I can't seem to be able to read. My doctor diagnosed me with what he called a BS syndrome, but he failed to provide me with medication (rest assured that I am suing him). So you see, I am simply unable to provide you with current tax returns that could better describe my "convoluted" financial situation.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
SAY WHAT???
By NBTDT
Bill Windsor said: “I am not now and never have been a so-called ‘sovereign’. Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or
anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link
me to radical groups.” Well, maybe
Bill is not a ‘sovereign’ as he understands the term. But it is a fact that GRIP and Lawless
America were formed by Bill Windsor to take action based on the political views
and methods of change advocated by several radical groups.
Webster’s defines radical as: very new and different from what is
traditional or ordinary, having extreme political or social views that are not
shared by most people. And, a: very different from the
usual or traditional: extreme b: favoring extreme
changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions, c: associated with political views,
practices, and policies of extreme change, d: advocating extreme measures to
retain or restore a political state of affairs.
For the sake of argument, let’s say the
overwhelming majority of American people do not share the
view that it is a good idea to form Citizen Grand Juries to oust elected and
appointed judiciary, government and law enforcement officials from office for
treason, with threat of forced compliance through deployment of militia groups
and possibly a death sentence. Given that the majority of people do not
share that vision, any individual or group that does share and support that
vision would fit the definition of radical.
All through this blog we have made
connections between several radical groups and Bill Windsor. So, I put a list together (though, not
exhaustive) of the individuals and groups linked to Bill Windsor that, in my
opinion, are radical by definition.
Again for the sake of argument:
the term SovCit is used broadly in the list below, to include groups or
individuals sharing views similar to Bill’s and each other, on the Constitution,
politics and how they want to affect change in the government and
judiciary.
Starting with the CC2009, Bill has direct
connections to several state delegates and/or signers of the Articles of
Freedom.
Continental Congress Articles of Freedom: http://www.schroederforsenate.com/notes/2012/02/AOF_20100402.pdf
Alaska – Schaeffer Cox: Alaska Citizens Militia and SovCit
California – Orly Taiz: Birther
and SovCit
Connecticut – Deborah Stevenson: SovCit
Iowa – Michael Angelos: SovCit
http://www.meetup.com/SuperLiberty/, which is sponsored by http://fija.org/
Maine – Wayne Leach & Jack McCarthy: SovCits
Michigan – David Schied: SovCit
Missouri – Ray Herron: SovCit
New York – Robert (Bob) Shultz: SovCit,
Birther and Militia
Pennsylvania – William Taylor Reil: Sovcit
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America-Pennsylvania/188973404575330 (see Jan 25 ’14 post)
South Carolina – Karen Ruff: SovCit
http://shermaninstitute.info/ (Bio on page with Schied who lists Lawless America in his bio)
South Dakota – Justin David Shultis: SovCit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myBT9nxOxyY (interview with Bill)
Texas – Michael Badnarik: SovCit
Texas – Jon Roland: SovCit and Militia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR0RswR03ok (interview with Bill)
Edgar Steele: Aryan Nations
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ws1xdaG7s
(interview with Bill)
Delegates to CC2009 with connections to Bill, David Schied
and Jon Roland, were on the GRIP Steering Committee and were state
Coordinators. Bob Shultz was asked to be
on the steering committee.
Others involved with the start-up and organization of GRIP
and Lawless America are:
George Mcdermott: SovCit
Arnie Rosner: SovCit
Diane Gochin: SovCit
Denise Loughlin: SovCit
Phil Stimac: SovCit
Ron Branson: SovCit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFI5K-YyuTc
(interview with Bill)
Rod Class: SovCit, Militia and “Private Attorney
General”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTplpCGh73E
(interview with Bill)
Other individual and group connections to Bill Windsor:
Stephanie Strong: SovCit
Gene Paulson: SovCit
Carl Swennson: Birther, SovCit and Militia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcxa3sh5qHM
(announcement of formation of Citizens Grand Juries that have returned
indictments for treason)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eukvd_x3Id4
(Oath Keeper video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dge1bs9hfY0
(interview with Bill)
Bob Hurt: SovCit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iexb4bCGJb4
(interview with Bill)
Richard Fine: SovCit
http://www.richardfinelaw.com/
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1230:attorney-richard-fine-exposes-judicial-corruption-for-lawless-americathe-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105
(includes clip of interview with Bill)
Robert Fox: SovCit (and Canadian Fugitive)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkE3p6tneH4
(interview with Bill)
Veronica (Niki) Hannevig:
SovCit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bkZ-c2bz5U
(interview with Bill)
National Liberty Alliance: SovCit
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Windsor Found Not Credible in Montana
http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0618%20Noncite/Memorandum%20--%20Opinion?id={5B24CC86-9BAA-4E96-8863-187A822BB699}
Just a day after being slapped with the vexatious litigant tag in Texas, Bill suffered a humiliating defeat in Montana in his appeal for a temporary order of protection against Boushie. The Montana Supreme Court issued a memorandum opinion which is not subject to case law (sorry Bill you wont be famous) in which they denied both of Bill's attempts for a TOP against Sean.
Bill had applied for a TOP in Ravilli County, and then once denied, he tried it in the City of Missoula, again being denied. As we have chronicled, Bill's entire life is built on not taking no for an answer so he appealed it all the way up to the Montana Supreme Court.
The Court found that all of Bill's extravagant claims of cyber-stalking and being in fear of bodily harm were not supported by actual evidence or the facts. Why would someone drive over a thousand miles and come in to close proximity of the person he claims is threatening his life? Those are not the actions of a person who is in fear of his life, the Court found (they are calling him a liar basically). "The District Court thus found that Windsor’s claim of reasonable apprehension of bodily injury “appears specious.” Thats a fancy way of saying, you lied Bill.
Then they addressed the infamous car bursting on fire incident. You know, the one where Bill was driving up to go stalk Boushie and the car in front of him burst in to flames, obviously, as Bill claimed, part of a murder attempt by Sean. Bill quickly got out of his car and took some high quality no doubt copyrighted photos of the incident (again, if you thought you were being shot at why did you stop and get out of the car?) One photo was submitted in court as "proof" of wild Bill's claims. The Court addressed it by saying: "Windsor submitted one of these photos; however, the District Court observed that “[t]he ‘photo’ of this incident submitted by Windsor is a virtually all black Rorschach blot, indecipherable, and contributes nothing of value, except to increase the Court’s skepticism of Windsor’s credibility.” I hate to break it to you here Bill, but they are basically calling you a liar once again and a bad photographer.
As a parting gift, the Court gave Bill another blow to his other frivolous lawsuits all across the Country. "There is no credible evidence that Boushie harassed, threatened, or intimidated Windsor.
Moreover, the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity,
§ 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved
“First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear
familiar and in which they regularly engage.”
NOOOOOOO Court, you got it all wrong, only Bill's speech is protected by the First Amendment, everyone else is defamation, stalking, identity theft, libel and malicious fill in the blank...and any other words I come across that I can add.
You can find a good scouting report on vexatious Bill over here http://lifeinpiercecounty.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)