Friday, December 21, 2012

Daddy and Presley Dauben Turn on Joey

https://www.facebook.com/wheelieblazer

Daddy shared a link, liked by Presley, that speaks out against verbally abusive bullying.  So as the father of the biggest bully in Ellis County, I can only assume this means he, along with Joey's fake fiancĂ©e  are now turning against him.  I wonder what it was that helped them become aware of this serious problem?


Its once again funny to see how a Dauben thinks.  To be a Dauben means you have the ability to overlook all self awareness thoughts and make your own reality whatever it is you say it is.  Dauben fact-checking works like this:  If a Dauben says something it must be true because a Dauben said it.

122 comments:

  1. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM

    Too funny - when I clicked the FB link, I found one of my horse whisperer friends had posted a picture of a braying donkey, his eyes closed, with the caption: Do not try to win over delusional people.......You're not the Jackass Whisperer.

    I need to learn how to do the tinypic thing so I can share, the photo is cute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tinypic is easy. right click on the photo. download to desktop. go to tinypic.com, browse and find it. use the bottom link text when it give you the uploads.

      Delete
    2. If you're taking a screenshot of fb, clip out all identifying information first.

      I couldn't find what Ginger is talking about. Neither presley nor david is on my friends list. I can only see things when my bestie connie 'likes' their stuff or they tag her. opps, gave it away.

      Delete
    3. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 10:49 AM

      Yeah, I'm going to have to play with it on a different computer. Too much company ID on this computer.

      David's post is public - it's a poster about bullys. Presley clicked the like button.

      Delete
    4. the Dauben thing is just a pic yap, no screenshot necessary

      http://i47.tinypic.com/2jhoi.jpg

      Delete
    5. NB, apparently there are a few like this:

      http://ct.fra.bz/ol/fz/sw/i54/5/9/17/frabzfunny_a9c857b0ee4628a784504702696ed734.jpg

      Delete
    6. No, tinypic doesn't give out identifying information. I meant if you screenshot with your fb, your FB name would show in the screenshot, Cut your face, name, etc out before you make a tinypic. Sorry, I hope that explains better?

      Delete
    7. yappy, David's pic is this:
      http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=355730504518997&set=a.261265353965513.59972.119325651492818&type=1&theater

      Delete
    8. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 11:36 AM

      OReader: good job! That's it.

      yappy: when I went to download into tinypic, the saved file had too much company and user ID.

      Thanks to you both for the tips. I'll work on it later from my personal PC.

      Delete
  2. To be a Ginger Snap or the cronies means you have to overlook all self awareness thoughts and make your own reality whatever it is they say it is.

    If a Ginger Snap or the cronies says something it must be true because a Ginger Snap or the cronies said it.

    Works both ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 10:52 AM

      Anon: your word games are boring. If you want to engage us, please come up with something original, intelligent or funny.

      Delete
    2. you can say it anyway you wont but its only true one way. See how reality works?

      Delete
    3. Funny. I've seen plenty of legitimate documents and evidence posted here. Like say Baron's latest "win." It was all posted. We could have just reposted the derogatory stuff where it discusses his hiring and not paying his attorneys, his attempts to transfer money overseas, his vexatious litigation. But, instead the whole thing was posted including his "win" where the courts decided the receivership was an overstep.

      If it were on Connie's page or Loryn's page, we'd just have a scan of the key points while ignoring the whole picture. Or we might just lie to people about what was said.

      Welcome to reality where people are able to rationally and critically read &process documents and "evidence." I know it's a hard concept for the Daubenistas of the world.

      Delete
    4. What's funny is the same old tired rhetoric. Can't you all come up with something new?

      Delete
    5. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM

      yawn.......can't hardly keep my eyes open to the end of the sentence.....another yawn..........

      Delete
    6. No anon, there is nothing new. You are posing the same questions and making the same allegations as always. And yet, continually, you are proven wrong. I get you yet ANOTHER example of how it's done over here as opposed to the dimwitted presentation made by the other side. I've shown how the court decision for Jeff Baron was presented in full & the "wins" on his side were acknowledged. You want to see how it's done on Connie & Loryn's side. Well, just the other day we were talking about Loryn's post about her GaL payments as well as her gag order. Conveniently, there was a lot on those pages that she neglected to address. Need examples? Well, she says that everything goes in her ex's favor. Well there were more than half a dozen motions by him that were dismissed. Oh, and she points out that he owes nearly as much as she does, but fails to point out that his portion was nearly twice what she had to pay, so he'd already paid a substantial amount. Oh, and want to get me started on how she OBLITERATED the statistics in a published scientific study? I gave the REAL statistics including the ones to support her argument, but of course, like a real Daubenista, she never made corrections.

      Delete
    7. And you think that I'm referring to the Daubenistas for what reason?

      Delete
    8. Wow. You aren't very bright are you? No. I was pointing out that your rhetoric is old and each time you ask I can find you a brand new example of how deluded you are.

      Delete
    9. When all else fails, go with insults. Don't worry, we believe you all. LMAO

      Delete
    10. "Dont worry, we believe you"

      Who the hell is "we"? Have you finally come to grips with the fact that all those voices in your head isn't God?

      Delete
    11. Annnnnddddd more insults. SOS. Anyone else wanna chime in here? We're waiting....

      Delete
    12. Anon, again, what is your question, or point or what is it you are trying to discuss?

      When people start talking in the first person, or use the royal 'We' in comments (ie, not specifying who this group of 'we' is) I tend to skip past them.

      If you have something to talk about, could you actually say so? It's not that I am not willing to discuss something with you- but you actually have to have a point to start with, or a question that can be answered that includes the topic.

      Thanks... lol

      Delete
    13. Sorry but the thing that has failed is your comprehension. You couldn't read well enough to follow that I was DISagreeing with you. Yeah, I think that isn't very bright. Sorry if that insults you. I guarantee only you were confusrd.

      Delete
    14. Anon's post- 'To be a Ginger Snap or the cronies means you have to overlook all self awareness thoughts and make your own reality whatever it is they say it is.

      If a Ginger Snap or the cronies says something it must be true because a Ginger Snap or the cronies said it.

      Works both ways.'

      Umm, yeah, was it hard to type this nonsense? I only post about what I know, what I research and my own opinions on it. No one is swaying my reality. I don't believe everything I read on the internet- and I fact check unlike people like Joey, Connie, Presley, Bill Windsor and crew.

      I have yet to see you post any facts that I should check and decide on, did I miss something? Feel free to have an opinion, but let me know if you have a point in fact.

      Delete
    15. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 4:48 PM

      Nobody insulted you - we've made observations and stated opinions with regard to your posts. As the obvious seems to have escaped you, we are trying to help you by bringing the obvious to your attention.

      You, of all people, should not complain about perceived insults:

      "To be a Ginger Snap or the cronies means you have to overlook all self awareness thoughts and make your own reality whatever it is they say it is.

      If a Ginger Snap or the cronies says something it must be true because a Ginger Snap or the cronies said it."

      Now, it's that how you started the day? Trying to insult us? And you tried to insult us with a statement that is not factual. Please look up the definition of "cronies". If you had been paying close attention, you would know that "cronie" is a misnomer.





      Delete
    16. Trying to convese with Anon is like trying to talk to that bratty little kid that always replies "I know you are but what am I" to any and all statements.

      Delete
    17. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 5:13 PM

      Here's a fact in point - to tag onto Oceans and OReader posts:

      On LA FB page, the headline about Judge Furgeson says the Judge was accused of wrong doing. That statement is no where near the truth and it's not fair.

      The truth is that Furgeson made a decision, when he ran out of other options, to resolve issues frustrating the courts due to Baron's delays, actions and abuse of the system. In using the same system properly, the system worked in Baron's favor - the decision was over turned. Judge Furgeson did nothing wrong. In fact, in their decision, the appellate Judges expressed their understanding of Furgeson's decision. They were simply unable to support it by law or precedent.

      Delete
    18. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 5:22 PM

      G/Snap: LOL - I was thinking this is like trying to talk to Peewee Herman.

      Delete
    19. It is the purpose of the appellate courts to make these types of reviews and to over turn if needed. It is part of the process of checks and balances. It does not mean what they want it to mean(that there was corruption or conspiracy).

      This does not play as well to the masses as Judge=wrongdoing so of course it had to be worded that way.

      I actually think that this group would be interesting to study. I never knew about half of these conspiracy theories I have read about since following Lawless America.

      O.o I may need to start wearing tinfoil hats more often and painting some walls with metal infused paints to protect me from the mind control...hope the landlord doesn't mind...LOL

      Delete
  3. Ok, So I'm just looking at the ECO2 webpage. This is literally the FIRST article I have opened, Joey starts off with a good title. Brannon follows up with some nice comments, but, ha ha, look who the voice of sanity is:

    Pretty Gay | 2 Seniors Told No Diploma Unless They Shaved
    Posted on June 1, 2010 by newsadmin

    Two high school seniors last week were told that if they didn’t shave small amounts of facial hair, they would be barred from walking across the stage to receive their diploma…there was a discussion about this on last night’s EllisCountyRadio.com broadcast (daily broadcasts at 9:30 p.m., CST, seven days a week), so check there for more details: www.elliscountyradio.com

    Brannon Bridge
    June 1, 2010
    That’s retarded for that to of happened

    charlotted
    June 1, 2010
    This is not the govt. IDIOT. It is a school board trying to teach your kids a little respect and how to cope with life after school. So, in your world, let’s just give them all the knives and guns they need, include whatever drugs they like, and let them do whatever. The moral of this story is, you have no idea. Secondly, no one is telling kids to enlist in any undeclared war. Obviously, these 18 year old kids that enlist in the military have more of a grasp on life than you do. What a waste of space.

    Brannon Bridge
    June 2, 2010
    Once Upon a time, Charlotted was a retard….The End. That was actually the whole story from the time it began till the time the story ended, she never changed.

    cheri dauben
    June 4, 2010
    Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean that they are retarded or that they are rambling. If it is open to debate, then one must expect differences in opinion.
    Were these the same dress code rules that have been in place all year long or is it a rule that was put into place right before senior pictures/graduation?
    I see both sides to this problem. I personally do not have a problem with beards, long hair, piercings, tattoos, etc. However, rules and laws are necessary in schools, on the roads, and in our country.
    I doubt the people who made the rules really have a problem with a neatly trimmed beard, a piercing or two, etc., but you have to draw the line somewhere because you will always have someone carry things to the extreme or that will cause a distraction to other students. People are concerned with the extremists and whether they will jeopardize the safety of others.
    It all goes back to the purpose of being in school in the first place…to learn. Anything that poses a distraction to the learning process must be eliminated. Having everyone conform to certain dress code/rules is the BEST solution.
    It is the same type of argument as infringing on people’s rights in regard to airport searches or red light cameras. Most people are more willing to sacrifice some of their rights in the name of safety.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kevin's House is Back Up And Running: Same Gay Guy (Richard Jackson), Different Name ("Boarding House")
    Posted on May 8, 2010 by newsadmin

    Why isn’t Richard Jackson rotting behind bars for financial coruption and sexual harassment? Google “Kevin’s House halfway house” for the full details, but word is that Richard “I’m Gay And Love Young White Men” Jackson is up and running again in Boyce, where Kevin’s House was located, and where “Boarding House” is up and going.
    Expect a camera crew in Boyce soon, “Dick.”

    suckstobeyou
    May 10, 2010
    What about you, Joey? The same gay guy running his mouth about a bunch of shit he has no clue about. You little queer.
    Reply
    1.
    Joey G. Dauben | The Palmer Post
    May 10, 2010
    What about me?
    I’m going to see to it that Richard Jackson gets put behind bars.
    And any supporters of him will be on the receiving end of my blog/pen/newspaper judgment.
    I hope you corrupt SOBs are ready for Round 2 of this…because I’m coming after all of you who continue to support and cover up for this low-life perverted homosexual power-hungry, power-abusing POS.
    Reply
    2.
    Spacecadette
    May 10, 2010
    Fired up today Dauben with those POS SOBs LOL

    Steven D Anthony
    June 2, 2010
    I resided at kevins house for 2 years and I only pray for Richard Jackson, and Richard Rodriguez to burn to death for the crimes and cover-ups that’s they have commited, I woud be more than happy to testify in a court of law about the character of this cock-gobbling weasel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, Anon, really? I've looked at exactly TWO articles from Joey's days. NOTHING written here is anywhere near as vile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM

      Ditto. Nothing here is as vile or SELF ABSORBED.

      Delete
    2. You've got to be kidding, right? Nothing here is vile? Bawaaaahhhhh!!!!!

      Delete
    3. Oh yeah, nothing at all. Riiiight. Just more quality reporting by Joey, and a few well thought out responses by his friends.

      Delete
  6. Joey on judging:

    Joey G. Dauben
    October 19, 2009
    Actually, judging is perfectly fine and Biblical. Judging is merely rendering an opinion, and this blog elevates judging to an art form, so I don’t want anyone to be brow beaten into not judging…this is where you ARE to judge (i.e., render an opinion.)
    However, I’m confident that after a gay club, the local high school chapter of the Ku Klux Klan will be next. I don’t see how WISD would ever disallow a KKK club to form…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, that judging comment was rather telling about how Joey openly embraced his bullying platform. And notice with all the other comments that Joey loved to bash gay people, it was one of his past times. And again, he got a lot of this from his father which is why I point out the irony of David now pretending he is against bullying.

      Delete
    2. wow there is so much so call "hate speech" in just Joey's archives, I'm having a hard time paring it down.

      Do you think this was a euphemism that Joey stuck in just for giggles?

      In: I Regret to Inform My Readers That I Am Not a Pimp Posted on March 1, 2010

      Joey says" I am not a pimp. I have never been a pimp. I have never hit a woman (I’ve spanked my little puppy many, many times, but I’ve felt bad about that shortly thereafter), nor advocate that, but in my comments to “Ellie mae” in February, I was portraying myself as a pimp. I made some remarks that women would not have liked, and I apologized for it in print (Sunday’s WDL.)"

      Never "hit" a woman, but "spanked [his] little puppy?"

      Delete
    3. I think his two little dogs have their paws crossed that Joey is convicted in two weeks and they don't have to go through any more beatings.

      Yeah Joey had one of his Daddy Dauben tirades against a poster he couldn't logically argue against so he followed the Dauben way and called her all kinds of names and insinuated that he would pimp her out himself.

      Delete
    4. Wow, so I'm reading one of his articles regarding the aftermath of his statements. (the pimp ones that he apologized for) And he goes right back to his non-bullying/namecalling that Daddy and Presley advocate:

      JoeyGDauben
      March 4, 2010
      Ironically, the more sewage that gets thrown at me on this blog by anonymous cupcake homosexuals from France.

      Delete
    5. Remind me why Webb likes Joey again?

      Delete
    6. shoot, I just noticed, I missed another kind portion of Joey's comment:

      Regardless of election results, I’ll still be here, this blog will still be posting material and you’ll still be a little homosexual French fry hiding behind a screen name because you don’t have the guts to reveal yourself.

      Nope, not a bully at all.

      Delete
    7. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM

      Joey hit his puppy???!!! Many, many time????!!!! Where did he learn hitting anything was OK?

      Up until now I didn't really have a feeling re: like/dislike Joey. I just had an opinion re: his "jounalistic" behavior. Hitting an animal pushes me over that cliff. Bad enough that he did it, but he apparently thinks it's OK enough to broadcast in public.

      Oh, "but I’ve felt bad about that shortly thereafter". Another one of those backhanded apologies. Too bad that God given guilt he felt didn't stop him from doing it again, again and again.

      Who's your bully now, David?

      Delete
    8. Yeah Webb covering Joey and defending him to the degree that he does is so ironic. Webby clearly demonstrated that his ignorance level of Joey is right up there with Jimmy. If Webb were going to be a good little gay activist like he pretends to be, he would have been coving the downfall of a classic gay bashing bigot with regressive gay desires. That would be the real, and interesting story in all of this, but Webby is so lost at this point he can't find his way home.

      Delete
    9. and keep in mind these dogs he beat were tiny tiny animals. We are talking like one and a half foot long and maybe 3 pounds in weight.

      Delete
    10. I think Webby thought he could 'mold' Joey into a personal plaything, I mean grand journalist. <<< not a factual statement, merely yappy's personal opinion. It simply means I believe Webby is "verklempt" when it comes to little Joey.

      Delete
    11. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 12:16 PM

      OMG!

      Boggles the mind that any human willing to hurt another of God's living creatures, but especially a child or pet, can claim to be religious and spirtual. This right here is why I take exception to some organized "religions".

      Delete
  7. I could do this all day.

    Shorter version:

    Waxahachie SWAT Team: Who Will Stop These Para-Military Nutjobs?
    Posted on January 3, 2010 by newsadmin

    Keep in mind these jack-booted thug nutjobs come from the same miniature blue bus that was used on a no-knock search warrant raid on the outskirts of Midlothian a year or two ago

    The victim of the 3 am SWAT “raid” is a guy by the last name of Haney. He’s been in and out of trouble repeatedly, but he’s also been the WPD gay punching bag. Haney’s homo, but that’s no excuse for pigs to harass him.

    ReplyDelete
  8. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 12:49 PM

    Sorry, off topic but I'm curious. Is LA claiming to have infuence with regard to Baron's "win" or, has Baron teamed up with Bill as a consultant to help everybody that's been "screwed"?

    LAWLESS AMERICA HAS A PLAN THAT WILL GET YOUR MONEY BACK, PAY YOU REPARATIONS, GET YOUR CHILDREN BACK, GET YOUR PARENTS BACK, GET JUSTICE.

    Now we need tens of thousands to join us. There should be tens of millions.

    If we get most of those who have been horribly victimized working together, we can do the seemingly impossible......we need to motivate those...with the goal, which has a personal pay off for everyone.

    Please share this on your Facebook Timeline and on every group and page that you know has people who have been screwed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, I'm not sure if they are going there yet, but I am sure they will. Bill & Jeff team up to start selling their success!

      And for some reason I read this in the autotuned Anton Dodson:

      LAWLESS AMERICA HAS A PLAN THAT WILL GET YOUR MONEY BACK, PAY YOU REPARATIONS, GET YOUR CHILDREN BACK, GET YOUR PARENTS BACK, GET JUSTICE.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtZfW2z9dw

      Delete
    2. NB:
      Billy forgot to add, "for only $199.99" Billy Windsors FOOL proof Lawless membership, you too can enjoy the perks of seeing your judges and corrupt lawyers behind bars. This deal will include an autographed photo of your favorite corrupt DA, signed by Billy of course.........."

      I'm sure he'll remember to tell them later when he whines how he's only 1 guy and can't do anything without money.

      Delete
    3. Damnit Oreader, I TOLD You to wait in line in Gingers brain, you drew the short straw last, remember? These posts that are 2 minutes apart will give us away and then they'll know.........

      Delete
    4. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM

      yappy - cracking me up, no yawning here! I didn't find the package. But noted that under the "we got a plan" banner a woman posted a long sad story about how she lost her daughter and needs Bill's help getting her back - Bill said, in effect, too bad LA can't get them all back.

      Delete
    5. shh yaps, don't give away our secret

      Delete
    6. okay there are some posts on LA FB that are really scary. In regards to the judges in Georgia that one woman alleges are corrupt, which are the same judges that Bill faced- in the post comments about how to deal with these judges and get them removed-

      'Kathy Thompson how do we get the State of Georgia to do the right thing?? They need to terminate thieves and liars and clean the system up.. I do believe in God and do believe he will handle all of them in due time. he is the ultimate Judge. They will answer to numerous charges to HIM one day.'

      'David Harbin THEY did bomb Judge Vance....'

      I sure hope this is just an observation and not a plan of action.

      Delete
    7. I would be shocked if homeland security isn't at least monitoring the FB page.

      Delete
  9. I found these two random articles interesting:

    http://eco2.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/political-domain-com-fire-sale/

    http://eco2.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/sex-offender-ordinances-unconstitutional/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah those two bring up some interesting Joey banter in the comments.

      In the one about the domain names, Joey says: "The Dude, would you like to use your real name on that accusation of extortion so that I may send you a libel/defamation lawsuit?
      I’ll shut your ass up really goddamn quick, but I would suggest that from now on, you watch what the hell you say.
      Accusing me of extortion is a pretty serious accusation. You can accuse me of other things like being a greedy investor in Internet real estate without having to resort to accusing me of extortion.
      I can easily make your life a lot more difficult.
      whocares, aka John Allen “Jay” Hoskins, for the last goddamn time, please stop posting comments on my Web site. Seriously. Stop it. I know you’re a homosexual since you admitted as such to my blog’s former webmaster, but that doesn’t give you any reason to keep on and on and on harassing me with your stupid little remarks."

      We can certainly see the unmistakable journalistic talent that Webby saw in Joey. David knows greatness when he sees it.

      Then in the sex offender ordinance we have this:



      Eventually there is going to be no where for a sex offender to live with all the local city’s making it so hard to find a place to live. Eventually these people will go into hiding if this trend keeps up.
      Reply

      Crow T. Robot
      June 29, 2008
      Btw making drugs illegal gives the power and price supports to the drug gangs. Prohibition never works.

      These both came from Crow T. Robot and this was in reference to sex offenders. This is Joey's one and only source on the Amber Hagerman Bill Fry connection. Yes thats right, this guy who was worried about to many laws against sex offenders.

      Delete
    2. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM

      So, I was looking for an excuse not to go muck the horse stalls. Reading Joey archives seemed like a decent enough excuse. Started reading, then realized - I'm still wading through muck, might was well go do it in the fresh air.

      OReader hit a gold mine of crap. So much good stuff I hardly know where to start. We don't "ban" alcohol? Free speech only applies to political speech, not porno? I know MISD teaches history and government, wondering if Joey skipped classes.

      RE: the fire sale - wasn't this around the time of the Combine massacre?

      Comments on both postings are priceless. But here's my favorite response from Joey:

      I’m pretty sure plain-jane calling someone a retard isn’t protected speech, but calling a politician a retard is.

      Maybe it’s just my odd view of the Constitution.

      I know there are others out there who see it my way.


      Delete
  10. Okay, totally off topic here.

    See Loryn's fb. Asking if she is delusional.

    This is how these women post proof. Notice the diagnosis of PARENTAL CONCERN OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE

    What this means, is Loryn came in demanding an exam for what she believes is sexual abuse. That is her right, and as a parent, I know this procedure first hand.

    What you do not see is any evidence of findings of sexual abuse. What you do see is a doctor listening to Loryn's claims and referring her to CPS and the Child Advocacy center for more help. Also note that the doctor says that Children's Emergency would also not do more than give her these referrals. That is because the doctor did not find the abuse Loryn described. He did not blow her off, and told her her suspicions could be brought to CPS.

    If this doctor had found abuse or actual injury, he would have acted. He even states to bring the child back when this bruising is actually present. Leads me to believe this was not actually present during his exam, and that he is basing this on what Loryn is telling him solely, as is backed up with the actual diagnosis.

    See this it the thing, she is describing things that aren't there, and then pissed off when the doctor can't find it. She is following Connie's play book to the letter.

    I hope there is no real sexual abuse happening, and that she is just delusional. But based on the stuff she posts and things like this, I have to say I have trouble taking her seriously.

    Obviously, there is more to this than Loryn cares to post, like what the doctor said was the actual problem or if the doctor found any rectal bleeding as Loryn claims. My guess is there was none, and there was definitely no injury found.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Such a freak. They should take her kid away and find a nice Foster Home or something.

      Delete
    2. The childs father has full custody. it sounds like all abuse allegations were investigated and unfounded, without evidence. Loryn keeps trying to fabricate things, but when she tries stuff exactly like Connie, it looks far to suspiciously made up.

      Delete
  11. okay, you won't find this post on Loryn's page anymore- seems it was deleted. Feel free to ignore this post Anon. Others will probably take my word for it having been there, but I wouldn't expect you to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://oi46.tinypic.com/kd781y.jpg

      Delete
    2. http://www.ehow.com/about_4578299_rectal-bleeding-toddlers.html

      Delete
    3. ;) thanks!

      I was surprised she deleted or protected that post- since it was getting her so much attention. These types of posts of proof always tick me off, because there are so many who blindly believe them and their allegations.

      Seems there is someone picking on Connie too. I would have taken a screen shot, but this isn't my laptop I'm using. These groups love to cross post each other's stories. I wonder if any of the truly abused children's moms realize they are becoming less credible by following and posting about bogus stories?

      The lack of critical thinking cracks me up when I look at Connie's banner about conspiracy theorists. There is a total lack of critical thinking or fact checking related to these people. Knowing actual facts about these cases make it all the more crazy how people just blindly follow them.

      Delete
  12. Ok so, Lawless America has posted a "partial" list of people going to Meet Me In DC. Supposedly 1404 people have RSVP'd but if you look at the event page there are 228 & if you look at the "partial" list it's 233. So there are 1200 people that have RSPV'd but aren't the list? I call BS.

    Oh, and just in case you were wondering, Lorraine Schaffer Haake IS going!!! Yay!!!

    But, I dunno if she'll get along with the other women there, look what I found:

    http://i50.tinypic.com/9jlrfk.jpg

    This is very very bad. Billy will not like this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and the list is organised by state and then first name which just makes me think the person maintaining the list doesn't know how to use Excel properly.

      Delineate.

      Delete
    2. lol, they don't even know how to use FB effectively. Asking them to understand Excel is just crazy high expectations LOL

      I saw that list, and the requests for the RSVPs on the post to state their name and the congressional reps, and the county and state. Simple right? Uh no, these people do not get the concept of posting only what is asked in that post. They go off on so many tangents and stories it makes my head spin.

      It's like there is no one paying attention to the random posts on the page either. I loved the repetative posting of the money making potential and promises to get everyone their wishes.

      Now they are trying to find an extra large venue to hold their big meeting in...
      Wonder who is paying for this? Is Bill selling pies to raise money somewhere I haven't seen?

      Delete
    3. Oh, come on the Daughters of the American Revolution is loaded. I'm sure they'll step up and help since that one girl's mother and aunt were active.

      Delete
    4. oh, and the president of the company that makes Vitamin Water is a neighbor and will cough up the food and drink.

      I want to go just for the free Vitamin Water...

      I do love how Bill has them send him emails, you know the ones he doesn't have time to read. Send me one with BAD GUYS in the subject...lol, dude needs to publish a list of all the categories, the list is getting pretty long now.

      He can always fall back on the my email was blocked or hacked again. I am waiting for him to say send me one with the subject line, MONEY FOR YOU BILL

      I am expecting a pay pal account setup soon.

      Delete
  13. "These types of posts of proof always tick me off, because there are so many who blindly believe them and their allegations."

    Just like you guys blindly believe every post of proof here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too bad you are wrong. Pretty much everybody here with the exception of you has gone out and sought valid research, legitimate articles, and court records in order to find see the full picture. We don't just sit on facebook trading articles written by people who misquote real research in order to favor their agenda. If you look around there are articles and court decisions linked all over the place. Unlike that little partial scan that Loryn shared on her facebook, they are often linked in their entirety even if summarized in the comments. People are free to read the WHOLE documents in order to form an opinion. Just like all the Bill Windsor court docs with Alcatraz Media and MoM, I probably read 100 pages in order to form an opinion. I also got my news from several sources, not just Bill's vanity Wikipedia or self-published PR news pieces.

      Sorry, but your claim holds no water. The EVIDENCE is all around you.

      Delete
    2. Which post are you referring to that troubles you? Provide evidence to the contrary. Court documents would be the most beneficial to make your case.

      Delete
    3. The question was directed at anonymous, not OReader. It would help your argument if you provided specifics.

      Delete
    4. Really Anon? Need your hand held do you?

      This post
      http://oi46.tinypic.com/kd781y.jpg

      Loryn has posted this as evidence that her child was abused and the doctor did nothing about it. The comments are from her "horrified" facebook friends who take her explanation of the document.

      The point is the document is evidence of nothing. It is nothing more than what it is at face value. Loryn took her daughter to the doctor and complained of rectal bleeding and expressed concerns that her daughter was being abused.

      Here is just one article of many many medical article that provides some possible explanation for this reported symptom (which the document she provided doesn't even corroborate that this symptom was presently and visible to the doctor).

      http://www.ehow.com/about_4578299_rectal-bleeding-toddlers.html

      I can go to a doctor and tell them I'm coming in because my nose is always bleeding. The paperwork I receive is going to say I came in because I get bloody noses. Who knows if I really do or not. But the paperwork is still going to say it.

      If I tell them my nose has been bleeding because aliens are coming at night and accessing my brain through my nasal cavity, my paperwork is STILL going to say that. I can make claims that there is a UFO that parks in my backyard every night, but without any further evidence, they are going to send me on my way. They aren't going to call the feds to open up an investigation. The doctor will probably appease me by saying that if I still have concerns that there is an alien invasion, I can contact the authorities myself. This is no different.

      That is the troubling part of that post. Nobody thinks critically enough to realize that sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. People sometimes have blood in their stool. It's perfectly normal. If the doctor saw any evidence of tearing or abuse, then the doctor would have acted.

      Delete
    5. And yes, I know who you were directing the comment to, but anybody with the ability to think critically and rationally is able to answer it.

      No need for court documents here. Just a functioning brain.

      The point is that she presented "evidence" that isn't actually "evidence." It's just a record of her claims.

      Delete
    6. Let's talk about you guys. Not anybody else. Any problem with that?

      Delete
  14. Uh yeah, no I don't anon. I actually read the links, do some of my own cross checking where appropriate, and require multiple sources and then check the sources when needed.

    Geez, buy a vowel and take another guess anon.

    see it's one thing to read someone's opinion and consider it, it is another to have someone post a fact as proof. It is pretty simple to tell the difference.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oceans, it's pretty obvious that you don't just take things at face value. There are SEVERAL people here (you included) that have brought interesting documentation to the table and presented them for people to read and form their own opinions. All anybody has to do is take a quick look around to see that people often respond by finding their own documentation and reference sources. That can only be accomplished by time, effort, and interest in full knowledge. (something that Loryn, Connie, Bill, and Presley all hope that nobody does - it's much easier when people believe what they read)

      When Loryn published her little photo with incorrect data from a Denver based study of abuse allegations during contested divorces, they all slammed anybody who asked for her sources. Why? Because she probably didn't even know her sources. She incorrectly transcribed the info from a speech that was published on YouTube. Instead of going straight to the source, she took information that had been told and retold to the point where the information was wrong. These girls are playing a giant game of "telephone" on facebook. I actually saw somebody repeat the stats they obviously got from her, and they were even more incorrect and contrived.

      Delete
    2. I know what you mean about that post Oreader- it's been shared across many of these mom's sites. Not one of them bothered to actually read the numbers and think, hey that doesn't add up...and if a follower questions it, they get put on blast. I did find a few who did mention the faulty math, and one of those got himself banned for being outrageous LOL

      And of course called names. It's like Connie, and others, if you don't believe them, or disagree you are called a pedophile supporter or worse.

      Bill is going to have some issues, because some of his supporters are really not on the same page, and actually have diametrically opposing views. But they will all work that out in DC ;)

      I am really excited to find out how they are going to get reparations and all their children returned. That's an awful big promise there pie man...

      I doubt there are 1400 people or whatever the number is, that can afford to take off and go to DC. But I could be wrong (lol, that's for you anon). I also doubt they have the money to get a hall for that many people in DC. In one post today, Bill told someone they might have to run everything on site...hmm is Bill still going? Yeah, he probably is, since he loves the adoration of his fans.

      Delete
    3. We see you're back to the insults. How's it working for you all?

      Delete
    4. Can't debate the facts, Anon? Just going back to your same comments. I'm sorry the truth insults you. But just out of curiousity, to which insults are you referring?

      Oh, and how's it working for me? Let's see:

      College education : check
      Good Profession : check
      Nice Paycheck : check
      Nice home: check
      Nice car: check
      Loving family: check
      Good friends: check
      Zero financial debt: check
      Ongoing Litigation: oops, none
      Criminal Record: again, none
      Court orders keeping me away from family members: darn it, none of those either
      Entertainment & Educational value of watching a bunch of crazy people on facebook: through the roof!

      I have no complaints. Seems to be working fine. How about you?

      Delete
    5. How's it working for you to post meaningless sentences? I understand you're attempt to antagonize or get others heated enough in order to get the blog shut down, but next time try to be a tad less obvious.

      How's Webby doing? He was kind enough to call me a slut among other things late last Friday night after his usual binge drinking. I'm sure he's a wonderful friend to look up to, not like us heathens ;)

      Delete
    6. Yeah, anon's trolling is pretty pathetic. However, I'm having a nice quiet evening at home watching movies with fam before we begin a long set of preplanned events for the next few days. So, this is offering some additional lighthearted entertainment. I don't believe anon has any ability to comprehend any of the thought out responses, but should anybody come to this blog without any knowledge of the players, it's going to be pretty evident who the troll is and who the people who actually use their brains.

      I stopped posting the Joey bullying because there was just too much to put here. And to think, the vast most volatile articles and comments went down the the seizure of the ECO.

      Delete
    7. Yappy got her feelings hurt. Oh noes, you got called a SLUT? That's mean-spirited, isn't it?

      Enjoying your vacation? Hope so.

      Delete
    8. lol naw I have thick skin. I've learned that from all the insane and crazy threats Connie and her pedophile child raping daddy sent to me over the years. :)

      I'm not on vaca yet honey. Tomorrow morning. If I have time to appease your little mind, I'll post a bon voyage pic. I'm sure there's a starbucks around somewhere.

      I was simply pointing out that Webby your sweet buddy was very good at name calling so while you point that one finger, a whole 3 others are pointing right back .

      Someone sounds very jealous btw ;)

      Delete
    9. Sounds like a very nice evening Oreader. Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays or BOTH :D

      Enjoy your friends and family & real world. Its sad how so many others don't have a full rich real life with loved ones. I actually feel a lot of pity for whomever Anon is. Seem so lost and needy. I guess any attention is better than none. Cheers to all.

      Delete
    10. Well since we are talking about how we are spending the evening I want to point out two things somewhat related. 1. Chinese gift exchanges at little Christmas partys are stupid. 2. Southern Comfort Pepper is really gross, I have no idea what retard would think that whisky and tabasco sauce would go good together but I guess thats one of the wonderfull things the nation's armpit known as New Orleans gives us.

      Delete
    11. The last Chinese gift exchange we participated in resulted in owning a set of 6 beer mugs, fine, but nobody in my house drinks beer unless it's at a sporting event or possibly camping. So, they rarely get used. And . . . a black and white striped referee thong with a whistle on the front. Pure class. It was a white elephant party and I'm pretty sure it was a regift from one or several other white elephant parties past.

      Southern Comfort Pepper does not sound good at all. Hey, I like New Orleans . . but in the same sense that I like Chicago. New Orleans . . hotel . . . food . . aquarium . . .zoo. Chicago . . food . . hotel . . art . . symphony in the park.

      Delete
    12. Oh yeah. I failed to say that I'd never live in either. And if Joey wanted real filth and corruption, both would have been great locations for him.

      Delete
    13. Haven't tried either but I'll sure remember this now. Southern Pepper sounds really gross.

      . Have you ever tried a Caesar (drink)? Yummy. Funny story, I didn't know until moving to Texas that it was a Canadian invention. I told my dad this one night and he said "of course it is, I knew the guy who invented it, even went to his funeral. lol

      It is very good. The only place I can find Clamato juice is Walmart. Not sure in the Dallas area.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_(cocktail)


      1 1/2 oz vodka
      fill with clamato juice
      3 dashes Tabasco® sauce
      3 dashes Worcestershire sauce

      Line the rim of a glass with salt and pepper. Over ice, add vodka, fill with clamato juice, then add the remaining ingredients. Garnish with a celery stick. Add more tabasco sauce if desired

      Delete
    14. Beer gets boring to me, plus it doesnt taste all that great to start with. So I like liquor for a once a week drink and I usually rotate out whisky, rum and gin. I'm not that picky but this SoCo Pepper stuff might be unworkable. Something about tabasco sauce on your tongue after a shot just doesnt seem right.

      Delete
    15. Actually I've been thinking of buying stuff for bloody marys for weeks. (I don't drink often.) I might do this instead.

      Delete
    16. Yep, yappy, it's hard not be jealous of your slut status.

      Delete
  15. Oceans, if you haven't read this, you should. I knew there was one of the initial articles about Joey that I couldn't remember a few weeks ago when I was recanting how I found out about him.

    http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2009/sep/22/ellis-updated-county-publisher-learning-hard-lesso/?refscroll=1178

    I haven't reread the whole thing, but I do take issue with the statement that Joey went to NH to go to law school. It is my understanding that you have to have an undergrad degree to go to law school. I don't believe Joey as earned even as much as an associates, but I could be wrong (that's for you anon as I don't have access to Joey's transcripts).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks for that link, and yeah, Joey barely made it out of high school right? I really don't see him pursuing a law degree, and definitely he would need a college degree first.

      The article gave me quite a bit of the early history, it was helpful. Joey is interesting with all the various angles he has worked.

      Some of the comments made me laugh- especially those expressing disbelief that this was indeed non-fiction and not some bizarre soap opera LOL



      Delete
    2. Joey went to NH to try and start over, the law school bit was just the excuse he gave. He finally realized that his name was mud here so he went up there to a place no one had heard of him to try and start over. He made quite a few enemies up there in a very short time period.

      Delete
  16. I find it funny that we can directly respond to anon's questions, but after the response , anon just sees fit to change the subject. So much for a debate. I'm fine with discourse and differing opinions. However, one has to actually state an opinion and give something to back it up. Anon apparently is unable to keep the chain going.

    Anon, perhaps you need a little adderall or concerta or maybe even some thorazine.

    ReplyDelete
  17. You've been looking in that mirror again? 'Cause you described yourself. And have a field day with your meds. Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Back to your little "I know you are but what am I" game?

      You do realize that by not being able to articulate a single point, you aren't making any kind of case for your opinions, right?

      And, sorry, I don't hear voices or refer to myself as "we" so there is no need on this end for that thorazine. But, yep, OMG, you got me! I'm ADD. OMG. Such shame and derision I feel!

      Delete
    2. This little anon thinks he's powerful trying to poke and provoke. While I sit here and laugh my ass off at every one of it's failed attempts. What a funny little person, I guess anon is a lonely ole soul who has no friends so he/ she is stuck with the likes of us. We must be fascinating, no?

      Delete
    3. Anon is just trying to learn witty repartee and is failing miserably, and is pretty much out of things to say.

      I keep trying to give out pointers, and help anon along, but anon doesn't seem to want to try.

      Delete
  18. One thing I do know, I've never heard more stuff about molestation in all of my life (including the Roman Catholic church) since this news broke...

    I am seriously still creeped out about "Daddy's worm". There are few things that haunt me....

    Just curious, why wasn't Joey just ignored? If his many papers were so small and he offended so many and if he didn't have much credibility... Why wasn't he just considered a crying child throwing out big names & accusations at people from Jr. High?



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh Jimmy! I was just thinking about you! Here is a link for you about cybersquatting legislation.

      http://www.internetlibrary.com/publications/anticybsquattSamson9-05_art.cfm

      Why wasn't Joey just ignored? Well, some people apparently did. Some people like me had never heard of him despite Webby telling us over and over that he was high profile. Sadly, I read LOTS of different news publications in Dallas, if I ever ran across Joey's before he was jailed, I'm pretty certain I just thought it was some crazy kid's blog. Why did some people follow him? Well because it was salacious and entertaining. And some people who were in pain were looking for anything to fix that, what better than your little neighborhood Jerry Springer.

      Delete
    2. You keep saying how creeped out you are Jimmy. Blame Connie. She rehearsed over and over again making that poor little girl repeat that awful untrue thing about her daddy. Its even in the court records how she terrorized her daughter. Besiides what you see was heavily edited. What Connie doesn't show is the other 12 minutes of the child eating a kosher hot dog in the hallway with her aunty.

      Maybe that will make you feel better now understanding what you saw was NOT what it really was. Funny how technology can convince people of things. Oh and the Hobbit isn't real either.

      Ohh but Santa is real. Merry Christmas

      Delete
    3. Joey was ignored. How do you think he made it for 10 years like he did? He could have kept going too if he hadn't screwed up and fell right into their laps. Joey had a following, it was small (you know the far right tea partiers that want to secede from the Union) so he presented an annoyance. Not a threat, just an annoying little gnat to the powers that be, so when he finally committed a felony, that was the end to the kid we know as Joey.

      Delete
    4. Oh my Yappy, I hadn't thought about the full length video in a couple of years. Yes Jimmy, it would alter your opinion if you saw what really went on the night Connie recorded what was later edited and captioned to be released to the masses. In the beginning the entire video was out there. Not sure if it is anymore.

      You should also know that based on information from Connie that is no longer out there, that video was shot after several days of being in Connie's custody, the night before she was due to be returned to her father. There is proof that Connie coached her daughter. The really awful part is that this legacy of videos (they are spread far across the internet, all tagged with the child's name) will be there when she grows up. Connie made it her mission to post this everywhere.

      Just like Joey did with both Connie and Presleys stories. Splatter it everywhere making removal near impossible. It doesn't matter if they are disproved, or found innocent in courts, these fathers and victim children will have this follow them as long as there is an internet.

      That is what should bother you Jimmy, that there are real victims to this internet abuse. That is is not going to go away easily. That these people can spread their lies and get away with it.

      For Joey that time of getting away with the crap he did ran out. He is now a convicted felon. He will have to live with all the many legal judgements against him if/when he gets out. Dude screwed up more than his own life, he hurt innocent people for the fun of it. Sick.

      Delete
    5. What are you wanting Oceans? I do have quite a bit in old files. Let me know and I'll get around to digging them up. But send them to my email please. thx

      Delete
    6. Nothing you need to look for now Yappy, pack for your vacation, and know I am jealous you are going on a cruise!!

      My comment was really to Jimmy about the full length video Connie shot, and how the edited down one was sooo very different. I have tons of old files too, but not here, and not on this computer(it's borrowed).

      I am off reading about the chaos that Joey created...welcome to the twilight zone, you can't tell the players without a program LOL, I may have to keep notes!! Boy got around to messing with a lot of people. I wonder if he is fully adjusted to not being on the internet again- possibly for many many years?

      Delete
    7. thats a good way to put it, you do need a program do try and figure out all that he is talking about. You can ask me if you need some context on his rants, I'm a pretty good tour guide for all things Joey

      Delete
    8. I've been packed for 2 days, excited like a little kid hehe. I don't mention this for others to be jealous. I hope you will have a wonderful Holiday Oceans, Merry Christmas my old friend ;). Lets chat when I return. I'm not sure if evering is in the ECO2. Sometimes you can go on the wayback machine, http://archive.org/web/web.php

      A lot of the old ECO is filed in archives there.

      Hugs Oceans

      Delete
    9. Thanks Ginger, sadly there is so much Joey litter all over the place, it is pretty easy to see what he was ranting about sort of.

      There are some parts I plan to avoid, because they are just too twisted up.

      I do see some shift in his attitude and writing style around 2010,maybe it's time to create a timeline of sorts. His understanding of the constitution seems pretty skewed towards whatever his point was at the time as far a things like freedom of the press.

      Makes me wonder how Webb thought he was some prodigy. Okay, no I really don't wonder, as I question Webb's understanding of the first amendment too. LOL

      Joey has comments on a lot of other people's posts too. I doubt there is a way to find them all, he had a lot of time on his hands to post.

      I do find his perception of himself as a publishing magnet to be pretty far out there. Dude, seriously liked to took his own horn. I guess calling those flyers/bird cage liners out and calling them newspaper publishing really went to his head.

      Delete
    10. I wish you a very joyful holiday, filled with love, laughter and too much fun. May you find your Christmas to be childlike and blessed, and yeah, hugs right back your way Yappy.

      Safe travels and happy times!

      and that post above should say dude loved to toot his own horn LOL, love the typos!

      Delete
    11. his ego was off the charts. I didn't mean that I needed to explain to you what joey was saying but rather that usually there is information that joey leaves out that would put things in proper context, much like all these other daubenistas

      Delete
    12. eco2 is missing tons of the newer more heated stuff as is the wayback machine. it doesn't seem to go very deep in, more of a front page caching. :( but good, I guess. better it die.

      Delete
    13. I appreciate the help Ginger, I have read all of the posts on the old site, and caught up on much of what was going on.

      I know there are so many twists and turns that it gets pretty complicated.

      It's just like reading up on Bill, and some of his followers. There are some real doozies in that group. I am almost shocked by some of them, and the lengths they go to. There is one woman who has written literally thousands of emails to various agencies. She posts them daily on her FB, and all I can say is WOW. She is a frequent flyer on Bill's FB. And that's only one.

      I wonder how Joey would have fit into that group.

      Delete
    14. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 22, 2012 at 10:54 AM

      @ Jimmy: Joey's targets only had 2 choices - 1) ignore him or 2) sue him. Well, we all know how that civil suit thing worked out for the TM infringement (aka cyber-squatting). What's another judgement against you when you have no income, no credit, no assets and will never see the financial light of day again? With no chance for recovery of attorney's fees and no chance for damage awards, what would be the point of suing?

      Two of Joey's targets that I know well just blew it off. Which I think was wise. It wasn't long before Joey went on to slander other people and my peeps were forgotten by Joey and his followers. And, please note: there might be a couple of Joey's targets that follow this blog and/or post occasionally, but none of the regulars were targets - just observers of Joey, indicating Joey's posts were largely ignored by the targets.

      Gingersnap is right: if Joey hadn't gotten too big for his britches and crossed the line into criminal behavior, he would still be posting slander and delusions today.

      Off topic, but for all of Joey's supporters watching us that think it is OK that Joey to HIT his little tiny dogs - I hope this touches your hearts. One of God's greatest gifts is the spiritual connection between humans and "beasts". This is my gift to you, Merry Christmas!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA8VJh0UJtg&sns=em

      Delete
  19. Replies
    1. Aaaannndddd, your point is?

      Way too many Anon's posting. It would sure be nice if all of the Anon's would post initials or screen name with comments.

      But, this isn't necessary for the Anon that acts like a bratty child, without an original, intelligent thought in it's head. I think we'd know that Anon under any name.

      NBTDT

      Delete
  20. OMG- from the LA FB

    'THE LAWLESS AMERICA REVOLUTION PLANS TO PUT ATTORNEYS OUT OF BUSINESS. PLEASE ADVISE ALL YOUNG PEOPLE TO FIND A NEW CAREER. THE $25 TRILLION U.S. LEGAL INDUSTRY WILL BE LARGELY SHUT DOWN.

    Virtually all of the money spent on legal fees is a waste of money and time. The legal profession has become a racket, organized crime in my book. So, the platform of our new Revolutionary Party is to totally reform the legal system so that attorneys will rarely be needed. This industry needs to be highly regulated, dramatically downsized, and cleaned up. So please advise every young person considering education and career choices to forget about law school.'


    Umm, yeah, sure thing Billy boy! ROFLMAO

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.