Sunday, December 30, 2012

Presley Dauben, Ummmm, Tries to, Ummmmm, Get Joey's Story Out, ummmm, On Bill's Blog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCwwbr0aWLU&feature=youtu.be

I guess Bill will let her post this one but not her own story now. This was filmed before Joey was convicted in Ellis County. Several points to this:

  • Joey can't be gay because I'm his girlfriend (I think we all saw this defense coming)
  • The boy in the Navarro charges is a liar
  • Presley isn't very good at this fraud game, she is still to much like a normal person. Its hard for her to lie and keep a straight face
  • She hasn't got the slightest clue what she is reading from, no idea the history, gap in facts and overall nonsensical nature that she presents this manifesto written by Joey.
  • She gives a shout out to fellow Daubenista Webby.
  • Blame everyone else in the galaxy besides Joey
  • Joey must be released because he is the only one that can find Amber's killer
  • Another backhanded slap at Brandy and Curtis in this statement from Joey

Meanwhile, the scissor sisters Connie and Presley are talking about us over at Connie's FB page.  They call us demons while Old Man Webby is still complaining about us over at his blog still calling us vipers.  So the crazy people call us vipers and demons.....we must be doing our jobs then.


71 comments:

  1. Couple of questions. I don't know the back-story. What's the backhanded slap about? What's your job and why'd they say you're vipers and demons?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the backhanded slap is because Joey considers his closest friends now his enemy and he always wants to throw that out there. They called us vipers and demons because they are people consumed by hate. My job is to expose stupid people who don't yet know they are stupid

      Delete
    2. Didnt hear her mention anyone named Webby?

      Delete
    3. Its funny when anonymous come in playing the dumb card. I'm sure you know nothing about this at all anon. Far too obvious :P

      Delete
    4. Presley refers to a 'dallas' reporter who is my in-house favorite whiney ole drunk. Damn auto-correct, I meant journalist.

      Delete
  2. Do you have a link to the webby reporter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. why sure, I'm always happy to let everyone read what I'm talking about, unlike webb who even though he keeps making blog posts about this blog, he refuses to let his reader (notice I didn't say readers)see it for themselves

      http://therarereporter.blogspot.com/

      Delete
    2. http://lmgtfy.com/

      Delete
    3. While I think it is important to see both sides, it is also important to do your own homework. If I'd asked my parents a question about something without trying to figure it out myself first, they'd point me to the set of encyclopedias on the shelf.

      The link has been posted numerous times. Anon, you'd think you'd want to get the background yourself instead of simply hearing it retold...

      Delete
    4. Jeez. I didn't mean to put a wad in your panties. I just couldn't figure out who Webby was. It sounded like a funny name for someone.

      Delete
    5. Oh well, after Dauben, Webby, and even Connie's Facebook page, I should be used to the laziness. None of them bother to use their brains or resources either.

      Delete
  3. Au contraire, Ginger Sap: I have indeed supplied your website address to individuals and group representatives who sent me messages saying they would like to get a closer look at how the minds of you and your extraordinary group of associates function. I just didn't want to give it out to everyone to avoid influencing unbalanced individuals from making contact with questionable influences. It's a practice I learned when I worked at the Southern Poverty Law Center. We weren't in the business of helping budding White Supremacists find others of their ilk. I'm not exactly sure what classification to place you and your cohorts in, but I'm pretty sure it's not something that the spread of would benefit society. Carry on and thank you for the opportunity to continue observing and studying you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah, I guess there probably are a lot of unbalanced individuals who follow your blog. Clearly nothing balanced goes on over there. . .

      Delete
    2. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 30, 2012 at 9:40 PM

      Hey Webby! I'm flattered. You made us story of the year and called extraordinary. Thank you.

      One thing though: I take exception to your statement that there was "homophobic, ageist language" on this blog prior to that infamous evening. I've been here since the beginning and read darn near every word - is just didn't happen. There were some comments that I could categorize as hateful towards Joey. And, some of Joey's family and friends made hateful comments with regard to some posts. But, there has never been anything on the scale that you suggest, nothing comparable to White Supremacists and nothing worthy of SPLC attention.

      I appreciate your concern about unbalanced people finding this blog. We don't need your protection, I think we've proven we handle unbalanced people very well. In fact, I think that's the whole point of why we're here. Wouldn't be much point if we didn't such a wide range of unbalanced people to keep an eye on and discuss.

      The thing that makes this even more fun, is when we know that the unbalanced people are watching us watching them!

      Glad you checked in. Please come back soon.




      Delete
    3. And your professional and educational credentials to give that opinion weight are exactly what, dear? Did you actually ever earn a living from your work as a reporter? Whether you want to believe it or not, my interest in Joey -- your former close associate you staunchly backed at first -- yourself and this entire cast of characters is strictly scholarly and professional.

      Delete
    4. ohhh is this the infamous whare wheporter himself back into the snake pit with the vipers against what he promised his reader on his blog? I don't care what you say you do behind closed doors, but since you have proven yourself to be anything but credible, I'm going to say: prove it.

      Yes I know you used to work in poverty, but those days are long, long gone. These days you are just some blogger like anyone else, so if you want to make a claim, back it up.

      Delete
    5. Webb, you are a moron. I have never supported Joey nor have I worked with him. I gather from this comment from you today that it was you last night also.

      I am not a reporter. I have never claimed to be. But, I can read your tone and writing pattern even in your late night escapades.

      I suggest you go read more of my comments and then compare them to the person to which you are referring.

      Delete
    6. Looks like rare is going to accuse OReader of being Lori Lee AKA Brandy.
      Mr. Webb is that where you are going with this?

      Delete
  4. @ NBTDT: I went on to the website the first time that evening to discover if what I was hearing about homophobic language was true, and I discovered a lot of it. The issue is not what transpired before, but what happened that night that got you shut down. The hateful language sure seemed to come natural to you.

    @Ginger Sap: You need to get some help writing coherent sentences that I understand you often need. You aren't making any sense tonight.

    @OReader: If you have no experience or education in journalism, what qualifies you to assess the credibility of other people's work who do have experience and education? Clearly no one writing on this website knows how to do anything but bitch and distort information.

    Kiss-Kiss, Bye-Bye now. And Happy New Year!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 30, 2012 at 10:15 PM

      Ahh Webby, OReader is right, you are lazy and don't do any research. Hateful language is not my thing, never has been. Gingersnap is right too, you just shot another big hole in your credibility. I wasn't even on the PC that night, I'd gone to bed.

      Delete
    2. You can be both singular and plural

      Delete
    3. Thanks for the clarification. BTW - I think you did a good thing to save the dog and help the family.

      Delete
    4. Whats on your bar menu tonight dear? Why didn't you join me on my heterosexual cruise. I gave ample notice. I even went out of my way to find you a hawaiian hula zombie in Austin the week prior. Not so appreciative, are you?. Hey Webby, my hubby WOULD LOVE to have a sit down with you in our home and share that disgusting old Cognac (paint thinner).

      Of course that was Webby calling us tramps last night, NO ONE uses those old words anymore. But its doubtful Webby will admit to a drunken drive-by on Gingers blog. Its just not his style is it dear?

      Kiss kiss lover boy and a sensational Happy and Gay New Year to you and yours :D

      Gay = an adjective to describe HAPPINESS of course SMOOOOCH

      Delete
    5. Ahhh anon is STILL playing the 'dumb' card pretending not to know the background of Daubenista's mental institution? ROFL well if the shoe fits

      Delete
    6. of course webby asks for NBTDT's credentials to ensure he won't write about educated professional moral citizens. He likes slumming with the Joeys of the world. What a way to end a 'career' my oh my oh my.

      Delete
    7. "You need to get some help writing coherent sentences that I understand you often need."

      I really hate to do this to you since I know your ego is the last friend you have in this world (along with your dogs which are forced to sleep with you each night), but your sentence is actually the one that is incorrect.

      "Kiss-Kiss, Bye-Bye now. And Happy New Year!"

      ahh so you are going to run back to your little hole and hide again after trying to attack us? In the wild west days you would be a shoot in the back and run like hell type of guy huh?

      Delete
    8. Hi Webb, let's see. Sorry. Movie night.

      Where to begin? I actually don't have to justify myself to you, but whatevs. I will first remind you of that freedom of speech thing you are so fond of. Last I checked, I can have an opinion regardless of my educational or professional background.

      However, do you feel qualified to decipher a greasy spoon from a Michelin star restaurant? Can you predict which movies are going to get critical acclaim and be nominated for awards? Well, are you a chef or a director?

      Hmm.

      Anyway.

      Nope, I'm not a journalist, but if you want to compare educations, my alma mater ranks higher year after year. And, yes, I did have to write quite extensively during the course of my education. In fact, there are published materials related to these projects. No, not like Joey's publications. These are real peer reviewed publications that require actual solid facts - like statistically valid - not that that means anything to you.

      So yeah, I am qualified to be critical of you, not because of my education or profession which both deal in research, evidence, facts, and statistically sound conclusions, but because I have a first amendment right to declare beef wellington superior to um, well um, chopped steak.

      And yeah, you lose credibility when you believe and repeat totally baseless conclusions like your assumption that I am Brandy Owen. Seriously, you call yourself a journalist, but you don't bother to see if there is a shred of evidence or even compare writing styles or background I've given regarding Joey. It's become much much harder to take you seriously after that little gaffe.

      Delete
    9. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 31, 2012 at 12:47 AM

      @OReader - you said movie and freedom of speech in the same post, made me think of a movie I recently watched. "Nothing But The Truth", 2008 with Matt Dillon. It's fiction, about a journalist that refused to give up her source, but inspired by an event that was big news for several weeks. Most of it is predictable, but relative and thought provoking. There's an unexpected twist at the very end that changed the way I was thinking during the movie. It kept me thinking for a couple days after.

      Delete
    10. Added to queue. The last suggestion I got here was great!

      Yappy!! Hail Caesar!

      Delete
  5. LMAO oh webby you are just so silly, Happy New Year to you too.

    Didn't you say you wouldn't be back till next year?

    ReplyDelete
  6. OMG I just read up on the Eyes for Lies opinion of the conster. WOW, not that I needed confirmation, but wow.

    Did Connie delete her facebook?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course not. She made a post calling everyone but herself an immoral evil lying pedophile lover. I guess EyesForLies made her point how Connie wants everyone to believe she's the 'sane' one and everyone else is corrupt or evil. Hit the nail on the head.

      The funniest or most interesting thing about EyesforLies is the FACT that she went to Connies own website to see her evidence along with the now deleted lawless video and her vimeo videos of another old interview.

      No one had to convince Eyes or brainwash her of anything - Connie did a great job all by herself. I guess the interviewer came across as wanting to help this helpless mother and Eyes was calling the interviewer naive and well basically VERY dumb for believing such a pathetic child abuser like that 'woman' Connie. I think the blogger left a few screenshots out in the event Connie decided to send her non-evil highly moral thugs to chase her down. I know a lot worse was said about our lovely Conjob.

      If only Connie would tone down the 'religion card'... toooo many scammers use that to get others to believe in their cause. Smoke n mirrors

      Delete
    2. lol, she must have blocked me...oh well, she must not like me paying attention to her again. LMAO

      Delete
    3. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 30, 2012 at 11:02 PM

      Yep, Connie's page is gone. Bummer. I needed a laugh, the Cowboys lost.

      Delete
    4. guess I will have to break out one of my older ids that can

      It's really lame to try to keep people out Connie, you know you love the attention. You have also been on the net so long, you have no idea which names to block.

      Delete
    5. OMG, does that mean she is giving up all her thousands of followers? Maybe she is just tired of teaching? LOL

      Want to bet she comes back online and claims the authorities took it down because of Timmy or her lightening, but she was able to get it back?

      Delete
    6. I'm confused Oceans. Connie claimed to have hacked me and has all the details of my life including a ton of pics of her child. But every other chance she got to post pics of her child she did and does - but those she got straight from her own mother (the one she hates so much)...... funny how liars show their true colours. You'd think she'd block me too. I'm assuming she's probably very threatened by you. Truth-tellers have nothing to hide.

      I can still see her page or wait, maybe I'm dreaming. I'll go ask my chickens. (Its as close to little birdy's as I can get)

      Delete
    7. LOL, if she is reading here, she knows who I am on FB, she used to keep me blocked. Maybe it's just me, but I can only see one of her pages.

      Doesn't much matter, I have other names I can use that are her friends.

      Those comments by eyes for lies were interesting. I have followed her blog off and on for a few years. She is very interesting to read about. I've learned a lot from reading her stuff.

      Delete
    8. Sad the way she talks about her own mother. She should think about the karma there- someday her daughter will be old enough to suffer the consequences of what she is doing/has done all over the internet using this baby's name. It's really pretty amazing her mother shares pictures with her given how she talks about her. Sad, but then that is true about so much of Connie's life.

      Delete
    9. I emailed you Oceans. ;)

      Connie only used her mother to obtain info about her daughter. How sad is that? I'm sure she promised her mama she wouldn't post any pics. She is sooo abusive to her mother and the things she says about her. I don't think Wanda had any bad intentions giving pics to Connie, I think she really wanted to re-establish a relationship with her daughter and probably felt like she was doing the right thing.

      Connie tried to claim on her FB before Christmas how she has Dustin's neighbors spying on him and giving her info and updates. If I could elaborate I would but her statement about that soooo proves she doesn't have a clue where he lives :). lol

      Delete
    10. She is lucky Wanda shares those pictures, and yeah, LOL, I don't believe the lies from CONnie. In fact, she is probably breaking a court order by even implying she is spying on her child.

      That Wanda can see this baby and gets pictures says a lot about Dustin. It is all on Connie that she can't. She chose her path, broke the rules, told the lies, and now she will have to live with those decisions. What matters is her baby is safe, and happy, and not having to make any more sick videos to please her mother.

      Delete
  7. Awwww Presley makes quite the butt kissing speech to get back into the good graces of thou Pie guy. She even pulls the religion card but neglects to use her foul-mouthed seriously trashy nasty personality she normally leaves for the greatest of all liars, her BFF Connie. I guess Billy can open his inbox to about 30 screenshots. WILL the real Presley Crowe please stand up?

    " I support Bill, my informally adopted Dad, 100% and will continue to do so in any way I can. "Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11"

    Nooo Webby, the butt kissing is NOT referenced to you at all, please do not take offense at that sentence or any part thereof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 30, 2012 at 11:24 PM

      That is one of the best butt kissing jobs I've seen in a very long time. The most truthful thing she says are the 1st 3 words, "I am confused...".

      Now that I think about it, clueless is probably a better word than confused. A good screen name would be "Clueless party of one". Now that she's picked a side, it might not be long before the only thing she and Connie will have in common is us.

      Delete
    2. LOL, I have to agree- those first three words are all that matter. The rest is a rambling wishy washy old fashioned foot shuffling teenager trying to talk their way out of something.

      And please people, learn to use paragraphs on FB...it's easy!!

      Delete
  8. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=456760114387497&set=a.281123581951152.68293.100001605360659&type=1&theater

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @yappie: Did you know the banner headline of the Austin American Statesman the day JFK was killed in Dallas was "JFK attends gay party," referring to the night before he died? Keep that Cognac bottle handy, sweetie.

      Delete
    2. Oh, I get it. This is a "what's wrong with this picture" game.

      *with hand raised* I know, I know, I know!

      Presley forgot to put on her safety glasses!!!

      Delete
    3. Got so excited, I only gave 1/2 the answer - and her gun isn't pink.

      Delete
    4. LMAO- I didn't type it fast enough...

      Delete
    5. yappy with a Y. I'm deeply offended by the IE. "ie "in my world means 'example'.December 31, 2012 at 12:52 AM

      Isn't it great to see children armed? So adorable.

      Its the 21st century - labeling girls with pink rifles is so unfair. Boys can like pink too you know.

      I'm not sure who this other yappIE is. I spell mine with a "Y" at each end and its my hubby not me who has the cognac ready for you Webby. Believe it or not, we're a very entertaining bunch. No one ever leaves our house without huge belly laughs. Hubby said he'll even challenge you to a drag-queen contest (for real).

      Why the reference to JFK? I'm not following other than he must have had a gay ole time in Austin I presume? I wouldn't know much else about his death other than the Dallas museum tour & tv mockumentarys, it was before my time.

      Although if you dig deep enough, I'm sure we can find Joey's in jail all because of the grassy knoll killers. If anyone cares, there is a REAL picture of yappy on google images in Dallas... (thought I'd give Connie n company something to do tonight).

      Delete
    6. yappy is not an exampleDecember 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM

      what the heck? Gremlins invade Gingers blog.

      My name heading said: Yappy with a "y". I'm deeply offended by the "ie" at the end from anonymous. "ie" in my world means example.

      Delete
    7. Freaking FBI is here too

      Delete
  9. NothingbettertodotodayDecember 31, 2012 at 12:33 AM

    Hooray! Connie's FB page is back on line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The FBI prolly borrowed it to make copies. You know how they are.

      Delete
    2. Seriously OReader would you SHUSH your mouf up. That was our secret. duh

      Delete
    3. Oh my bad. I'll do better yappy. I promise I won't tell them about the witness protection with the Mennonites.

      Delete
    4. No silly, not mennonites. Amish.. the amish. Youtube for the coded secret illuminati message is 'weird Al"

      Delete
  10. Okay who is Sean Boushie? Apparently the other Crystal Cox FB page*the dummy one I mentioned earlier* is slamming LA

    Thing is, it's the real Crystal Cox that Bill has as an editor. He has no clue what he is in for. LOL

    Yep, that picture on LA website article is the real Crystal. He is such a fool.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Okay who is Sean Boushie?"<~~~~ Thats me oceans... aka as the Crystal Cox Stalker, the guy trying to kil her, blah blah blah....

      Ive actually never spoken to the nutjob woman, she was paid by someone else initially to harasss me, (online reputation de-management expert) and I fought back. shes been on my ass ever since. If i dont do anything to her, she makes fake emails and accounts to look like me, adn post negative stuff about herself. I really believe shes actually psychitzo. I havent sued her, she dosent have anything.. but I helped David Aman who did. I didnt do much... just tried to kill Cox... LOL (Im sure she will see that and use it, oh well..) Marc randazza is suing her now..
      I'll be interested to see what happens now that she's on Billy shit list....
      Gotta go, FBI is at the door with fat mans arrest warrent..HA!

      Delete
  11. http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=856:movie-producer-bill-windsor-and-crystal-cox-threatened-by-stalker-sean-boushie-from-the-university-of-montana&catid=123:news-reports&Itemid=223

    okay, now I see, LOL, okay maybe Bill knows Crystal Cox, which is pretty funny, he deserves whatever he gets...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Boushie... Is he the guy that sued Crystal? (and won big time)?

    The Commander in Chief keeps having to post the same statement over and over. These women really had their hearts set on the MOVIE being a reality and changing their lives?? Really?

    How about taking ownership of your own life? Billy doesn't have a 'movie'. he has a bunch of youtube posts.

    Lawless America I removed all videos for women that AMPP said were their supporters who were filmed. Only two or three women responded to my personal email to them about the issue, and when they assured me they are not involved with AMPP, their video was reactivated. The others remain turned off. It's really quite simple: I choose to not work with anyone who is involved in any manner with the American Mothers Political Party.
    28 minutes ago

    ReplyDelete
  13. Looks like he had multiple restraining orders against her. She is just vile, and the more I read, the more she freaks me out. She is like Joey on steroids and then some.

    Great match up for Billy Boy. She is also like Joey in that she doesn't care about judgements against her. She is like Bill in that she loves Pro Se...and lots of defendants.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I find it hilarious that Ginger writes about Webb, crazy anon tries to get the actual website plugged, as soon as that happens, in pops Webby. He decides that nobody is qualified to judge his body of work unless they too are journalists. With this new revelation regarding my lack of credentials to filter content, I guess I'm just going to have to believe everything I read. I guess if a "journalist" writes it . . well that should be good enough for me.

    But why the hit and run Webby? Funny how he seems to be here right after "anon" brings him up. Sooo convenient. Then he "toodles" us. Then, anon pops up again and reminds Yappy of the previously mentioned cognac . . . vewwy suspicious I tell you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Floozie O'Reader: I agree there are lots of strange things going on. You truly have no idea. It will be interesting to read what you have to say in the coming days about all of the pending developments. You definitely ain't a reporter, honey. Vewwy interesting, indeed. And Yappy, don't be concerned about spelling issues. I often can't remember whether it is pussy or pussie.

      Delete
    2. Floozie - an old term used by old people. Lay off the booze spiderman. You scarwwing no one. Can't wait for your pending developments.

      World - meet tough keyboard guy. Tough keyboard guy - meet Joey in jail :D lmao

      Delete
    3. You people crack me up. I keep giving you hint after hint after hint. And you are still too fucking dumb to figure it out. You called yourself a floozie, as I recall. It wasn't my description of you. I called you a tramp. Anyway, all of you will eventually catch up. If I'm drinking any booze, it certainly isn't keeping me as sidetracked as your are, sweetheart.

      Delete
    4. If I had just a nickel for every time you low-life cowards made an empty threat on this blog, I would be at least $500 richer.

      Delete
    5. " in pops Webby. He decides that nobody is qualified to judge his body of work unless they too are journalists."

      But he gave Dauben a free ticket of being a "journalist" and a "reporter". I have a crayon and wide-lined paper too, so that makes me a journalist just like Dauben.

      Delete
    6. Yes Webb, I know I was the one who introduced the word floozy. It was my way of mocking your antiquated word choices. Perhaps those words are still a staple in the gay community. I don't know.

      Once again, I'd expect a writer to be able to tell people by their writing style, word choice, punctuation and other identifiable patterns, but again, you fail. Yes, that was definitely a Webby posting as an Anon last night, but I assure you, that Anon wasn't me (nor did they claim to be).

      Delete
  15. yep he is a waskely wabbit that way...

    a vewwey silly one, maybe he thinks we fall for it LMAO

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.