You're A Nobody Till Somebody Loves You

Bill Windsor is still hard at work with his vexatious lawsuits and ground zero seems to have become the Missouri court.  Among the multitude of frivolous motions he has filed there in just the last week, one in particular is worth exploring.  Bill says he isn't a public figure, or even a limited purpose public figure......because he says so and thats all you need to know.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4qOlSHNnmKeZ2pTWWRFTHItZXh0LW1tcDJ1TkVuZmwtS1pR/edit?usp=sharing

Bill's entire argument seems to boil down to two made up points....he says he hasn't gained mainstream media attention and there isn't any public controversy.  Of course he has told us over and over that he is a card carrying member of the press and he publishes his online newsletter.....but lets just let that slide for a moment and go back to his assertion that he hasn't gained any mainstream press coverage:

So once again Bill Windsor is calling Bill Windsor a liar.  And who can forget that opening line he had in his letter to every elected member of Congress:

"My name is Bill Windsor. If you don’t know who I am, you should. I am leading a new American revolution, and we have formed a new political party – The Revolutionary Party. It is our goal to become the dominant party in America, formed from the 99% of us who currently have little or no power.
If you are honest, we ask you to step up and expose the corruption of your colleagues and other government officials."

Doesn't really sound like a quiet private citizen to me.  He is claiming to be leading a party to take over the Nation and if you don't know him yet...you should.

Bill says, repeatedly, that there is no public controversy.  Afterall, what could be controversial about claiming that virtually all our elected officials are corrupt and need to be replaced...hook or crook?  He goes on to explain how these "haters" have created blogs and sites that are against him and his movement....yet there are no controversies and people were not discussing it.  Bill says he has no access to the media, therefore he isn't a public figure.  This is the same individual who has claimed, in his other lawsuits, to be a card carrying member of the press.

One thing that we can all agree on is that Bill has been an utter failure in his attempt to gain attention.  For instance, he decides to agree with me on his failure in DC when 300 people (only 48 ever showed up on cam or in pics) show up but nothing happens.  He claims its the haters fault because by that time we had killed the movement by making fun of it on a blog. The problem for Bill is no one would dare claim he is a successful public figure....far from it, he is a disaster.  But that he "thrust himself into the arena" of public debate.  He did so intentionally.  That fact cannot be disputed by any sane individual.....Windsor of course being disqualified because of that disclaimer.

Windsor is an Expert, And He Can Verify that With His Own Testimony

With all his frivolous lawsuits caving in on him across the Nation, Bill is now claiming that he will sue everyone for copyright infringement.  And he should know, after all he was sued for doing that exact thing....so needless to say he is now an expert on the issue.

Speaking of that, here is Bill's "expert witness" document he submitted to court in his Medieval Times case. The only person that could back up his claims was himself, but that doesn't stop him from trying.

https://drive.google.com/?tab=Xo&authuser=0#my-drive

Ok, so to sum up, he says he can explain how it was that Alcatraz had about $112,000 net annual profit from the sale of Medieval Times tickets, but because MT didn't allow Alcatraz to participate in some of their direct marketing promotions.....they caused Alcatraz a $4.4 million loss.  But the real fun starts on page 14 when he gets all nostalgic about his "life's work".

He explains how he got started as a flunk out student from UT who started selling credit cards to poor college kids who couldn't afford it, what a noble endeavour.  He was accepted to law school, but he wont say where, but since he was making so much money he decided to invest all of his savings....$3,500 into his new company.  Well its gets even crazier from there....the whole thing should have had the preference of "A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away".  Spoiler alert..Ryan discovered the internet.

Bill Windsor Chicken's Out

Its been well over a year now since Bill brought legal action against Allie in Missouri.  After tons of document production, question and answer responses and Bill asking Judge Rolf to force Allie give him a deposition......Bill still can't go through with it.  Bill and Allie agreed on the deposition to take place on June 2nd, this has been agreed upon for several weeks now, but like Bill backtracking on his own settlement in the Maid of the Mist case, the coward (sometimes pronounced Koward) decided to run and hide when he finally got his big showdown with Allie.

ALLIE OVERSTREET DEPOSITION POSTPONED

The deposition of Allie Overstreet in the case of Windsor v. Overstreet in Lafayette County, Missouri has been postponed. Repeated failure to produce documents necessitated the postponement.

It's going to take a very specific order from the judge on all the discovery abuse before I can move forward with the deposition. — in Kansas City, MO.

 

So you see Judge, despite the thousands of questions and documents that Allie has responded to.....well I still don't have anything to make my case.  Its incumbent on Allie to produce something that proves my crazy conspiracies are true.  As we have said all along, Bill doesn't have an iota of evidence to support any of his claims, but that never stops him.  What does stop him is when its time to put up or shut up.....that's when he calls in sick, asks for a rain check, or a do over.

 

Bill has now reached an impasse in the MO case.  Unless Allie gives him something she doesn't have, he doesn't have anything to prove his claims.  This is the exact situation with his cases in KS, TX, CA and MT.  Bill thinks he can make up any "claim" however insane and then its up to his targets to give him something that supports those claims.

Insurrection Within the Insurgency?

Well guess what? The NLA won't get to take back their country on June 2nd after all.  It seems you have to pay the filing fee if you expect to get on the court docket.  Darash explained to the clerk that he is the People, and Me the People don't have to pay fees.  Somehow that circular logic didn't impress the clerk and everyone now has to wait for Darash to make up a new "plan".  What is it with these SovCit types that don't think they need to pay the filling fees?

Anyway, as I have pointed out, the NLA is not only out of gas, they are actually going backwards as infighting and finger pointing now rule the day.  Darash is about the find out why all these anarchist groups end in failure....they have no structure.  Just like he tries to tell the US Government that they have no authority over him, the same holds true to his followers and him.  Who is he to say their idea as any dumber than his?  He seems to be backtracking and his followers can sense it.  A regime change inside NLA may soon be at hand when you look at the kind of comments that are being posted now:

"The courts have shown their contempt. They have shown their intent to simple brush us off. They have shown their willingness to prefer prison to enforcing the constitution. We have shown no method to compel them. They have all the power they need as long as we are unwilling to use force. The answer is in the sheriffs, who apparently, at this point are cowards and traitors and worthy of punishment reserved for traitors. The only entity that has so far shown a willingness to enforce the constitution is the militia. A meeting with the militia is the next nessessary step, to gather their support and influence."

That comment is dead on...paper terrorism isn't working.  The government ignores it.  The only way they can get attention including media attention is to go to show of force like the Cliven Bundy showdown.  This is the inevitable next step and is exactly why all these people are considered domestic terrorists.  Darash may not agree and come up with a new "plan", but it wont matter, his sheep are finding a new master and they want to see action, much like Gene Paulson got tired of Bill just talking about citizen grand juries and instead took action.

National Liberty Alliance Faces the "Now What" Phase

With the Me the People movement suffering another embarrassing turnout in their latest ploy to "take their country back" called Operation American Spring, John Darash continues to struggle to plug all the holes in his sinking ship that is the NLA.  Infighting, moving dates, lack of funding and the inability to get any court to notice their existence has Darash on the brink of irrelevancy.  He still says they are on for June 2nd in a Fed court in NY, but he is becoming increasingly worried that they may never get their foot in the door.  Darash penned this letter as he feels the pressure building:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/14-05-20%20letter%20to%20Federal%20Judge_0.pdf

They were able to at least get a file number for this case:

Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury v. Lippman et al

Date Filed: May 09, 2014
Nature of suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Assigned to: Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
Case in other court: NYS Supreme Court, Greene County, 14-00384
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury demand: None
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel

Docket Proceedings
Req # Filed # Docket Text
1 May 09, 2014 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York State Supreme Court, Greene County, case number 14-0384 (Filed over the counter, in Albany, NY with no fee paid and no IFP application filed) filed by Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)
2 May 09, 2014 2 NOTICE of FILE ON DEMAND by Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury (tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)
3 May 16, 2014 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed on 5/16/14 (tab) (Entered: 05/16/2014)

Wait what?  They filed it but didn't pay the fee?  So they pulled a Windsor?  Just in case this goes the wrong way and the court might want to use their jurisdiction over them they think they can claim "oh wait we never paid the fee, never-mind".  This shows exactly what this is all about.....same as Bill, they are just playing games.

Then we have Darash and the NLA embracing, while rejecting, their domestic terrorist status:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/14-05-20%20Information_0.pdf

Interesting that they correctly identify their main problems with the letter topic headlines of "Conspiracy Theorist, Domestic Terrorist, and Mental Disorders".  That kinda sums up the NLA (new lawless america). They go on to say:  
"If these false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other legal documents lack
sound factual basis why aren't they just defeated in a court of law, the reason they cannot is
because of the fiction of equity courts, that corporatists have been using to fleece the People for
over a hundred years, and now that the People discovered how to use the equity courts of fiction
to get justice from the judges and lawyers that have been making a fortune at this fraud, now cry
foul when their own tactics are used against them."

Please stop calling us Sovereign Citizens or domestic terrorists even though we fully support what they are trying to do and how they are doing it, not to mention that we are doing it ourselves.  We prefer to be called patriots or The People thank you very much.  Any other label is considered harassment (defamation for Bill). Me the People desire a free country where everyone is free to say and do whatever they want....as long as they approve.

Windsor Returns from Facebook Suspension

So after getting a 30 day time out on fb for violating their terms of service, Bill has given his few followers a proof of life as he re-emerged with really nothing to tell them.

BILL WINDSOR IS BACK AFTER A 30-DAY FACEBOOK SUSPENSION. back where?

My 30-day suspension from Facebook is up I'm sure it will happen again. I was suspended for posting a photo of a cyberstalker's face no you were suspended for violating the terms of service for facebook....you should know this by now. I wonder if it has anything to do with the lawsuit I have against Facebook no but I'm sure if Facebook were to connect the dots that you are suing them and trying to operate a Facebook page they would do more than just put you in the time out box.

I continue to work more than full-time on my lawsuits I can see, based on your career as a serial entrepreneur how this might seem like real "work" to you against my cyberstalkers ummm, no one is stalking you, no one even cares about you. The evidence is literally overwhelming oh well, maybe you can get a better hold on it next time then...so much of it. I've become a poor man's expert on defamation how many poor men have over $1 million on deposit with Wells Fargo?.

If you are interested in following the "trials" heh...funny you used "" because you know you will never have a real trial and tribulations I'm sure just driving down the street is a "tribulation" for you, checkwww.LawlessAmerica.com. I won't be able to do much of anything on the movie what movie? until my name and reputation get restored after the vicious defamation. you see folks, I can't finish the movie because of all these people who said I wouldn't make a movie.  I know that may not make any sense to you but so what.....I create the narrative 

With friends like these…

By NBTDT

I was looking at the list of people that provided affidavits and other documents in support of Bill Windsor for the Missouri case; there are a lot of unfamiliar names.    This raised several questions.     Who are these people?  How are they connected to Bill?     How long have they known Bill?     How well do they know Bill?    Do they know Bill aside from sitting in front of his camera for an hour?     What do they know about Bill other than what he posts on the internet?      When these people approached Bill to be in the movie, did they expect to become part of a revolution?   Or, did they offer their testimony only in hopes of resolving their own specific issue?     If they weren't active within Lawless America, then why were they motivated to help Bill in this way?    What did they say about Bill?    

I found that most of them gave their “testimony” to Bill.     In the moments when I've had nothing better to do over the last couple weeks, I watched the videos of the people on the list and gave Google search engines a good work out in an attempt to answer some of the questions.      The people whose videos are posted fit into one or more of 5 categories: complaints about child protective agencies, complaints from people who have been, or are advocating for someone convicted of a crime, complaints regarding losses in civil court, complaints of elder abuse, and complaints of government corruption from people who dislike and fight bureaucracy.    

The categories break down according to primary complaint as follows:

Child Protective Agencies

Total number = 15:  4 people complained that children were removed from the parents due to accusations of sexual abuse.   The other 11 people complained that children were removed due to accusations of physical abuse or neglect.      

Criminal Convictions

Total number = 18: Complaints of judicial and/or law enforcement corruption in conviction of 6 murders, 3 sexual offences involving children, 2 for physical abuse of children,  3 for kidnapping, 1 terrorist threat, 2 for fraud and 1 who did not disclose his crime (he gave his testimony under an alias).   All are claiming innocence.   

Civil Court “corruption”

Total number = 35:  Of these, 8 were for property claims, 27 were complaints of family court corruption in a divorce and/or child custody case.   Of the child custody disputes, 12 involved unsupported accusations of sexual abuse by one parent against the other, 6 complaints were either for not receiving enough child support or wrongfully ordered to pay support and there were 7 unsupported accusations of domestic violence.   All of the custody cases involve at least one accusation against the custodial parent, a few have two.    Except for Yevgenia Shockome.   Yevgenia deserves honorable mention as she hit the trifecta – she is accusing her ex-husband of sexual abuse, domestic violence and she is refusing to pay court ordered child support.    She is fighting the court order to pay support in two states.   She went to jail for contempt of court.  

Elder Abuse

Total number = 6:   All complaints were similar, regarding poor physical care and liquidation of estates.  

Government Corruption

Total number = 19: Complaints regarding judicial corruption, various government agency corruption and civil rights violations.   

There were 7 people on the affidavit list not counted in the category break down: 3 were just friends of someone else Bill filmed, 4 do not appear to have given their testimony to Bill and no connection to Bill or Lawless America was found in searches.      

There are 100 names on the list.    Bill has about 1200 testimonial videos posted and many followers that were not filmed.    Affidavits were publicly solicited from all of the Lawless America followers.   Surely the active and familiar members of the group responded to Bill’s call for help.   Sharon Anderson responded.   But she’s not included on the list.   So why stop at 100?   Why not submit 101 affidavits?   Does Bill just like even numbers or did he cherry pick his supporters?    How many other followers responded to Bill’s call for help but were not chosen?    Are the 4 people not filmed the only real world friends Bill has?    

Of the 100 people listed, I recognize 21 names as being active after the D.C. event last year; 7 have joined up with National Liberty Alliance, 10 espouse SovCit rhetoric and 3 are conspiracy theorists.    My count of active members may be slightly off, but roughly 79% of the people listed do not appear to be participants in the Lawless America revolution.   This causes me to wonder if the majority of these people were motivated to assist Bill only for the promise of resolving their own issues and securing a place in the movie.    

As for what these people have said in support of Bill, maybe the affidavits will be obtained through FOIA or shared once the case is disposed so that we can judge the credibility and validity of the statements for ourselves.   In the meantime, if the affidavits filed in Texas are an indicator, I suspect the Missouri court is holding on to 100 worthless pieces of paper. 

http://sharon-minnesotalawlessamerica.blogspot.com/2013/03/mnsharonandersonaffidavitmobillwindsorl.html 

Facebook Responds to Windsor's Lawsuit with "So What?"

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4qOlSHNnmKeX1JJdW9GRlRyNFk/edit?usp=sharing

While Bill continues to file his hurt feelings report across the country, he now has another female attorney to add to his can't stand list as he received the legal equivalent of a bitch slap in California from Facebook's legal department.  As you might recall, this lawsuit is because his feelings were hurt when FB took down his site due to sexually related material.  Of course this is very much within their right, but Bill's feelings were badly hurt and a frivolous lawsuit must ensue.

After not being served correctly, Facebook finally got notice of the lawsuit and they filed a Demurrer.  In this, attorney Julie Schawrtz points out that even if every single thing Bill is claiming is true, which btw he didn't document any of it, it still doesn't meet the standard for making a claim.  In another of words, its another frivolous lawsuit by someone whom seems incapable of filing anything but.

Ms. Schawrtz's assessment of Bill is spot on with the first sentence in the Introduction:

"Plaintiff William Windsor' s (" Plaintiff') Complaint against Defendant Facebook, Inc.
(" Facebook") is replete with inflammatory rhetoric, but it is entirely bereft of any factual
 allegation of misconduct attributable to Facebook."

Indeed, and well put.  In fact, you could apply that statement to all of Windsor's legal filings.  He is big on claims, short on evidence, and as we will see in this response.....he can't even provide even the most basic forms of evidence in support of his crazy claims.

"Each of Plaintiffs claims fails because Plaintiff fails to identify any Facebook account or any of the alleged actionable statements, leaving the Complaint devoid of even the most rudimentary facts necessary to support his claims."

Wow Bill, you didn't even save any evidence of the facebook pages you are claiming somehow harmed you? You expect FB to provide you with all the evidence that you need in order to sue them?  This ranks right up there with asking Google to give you all of your own emails.

The response goes on to list the TOS for FB which show that they were well within their rights as well as cite the CDA in that they are not responsible for 3rd party content, same as with Google.  I wonder if they know that Bill doesn't consider the CDA to be Constitutional?  But the real fun is when Schwartz gets to the different claims Bill tried to make:

"Negligence. To state a claim for negligence, a plaintiff must plead " the existence of duty
( the obligation to other persons to conform to a standard of care to avoid unreasonable risk of
harm to them); breach of duty (conduct below the standard of care); causation ( between the
defendant' s act or omission and the plaintiffs injuries); and damages." Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.,
Cal. 4th 465, 500 ( 2601). Plaintiff alleges no facts giving rise to liability for negligence.
Indeed, Plaintiffs contention that Facebook owed him a duty to keep Facebook safe is directly
contradicted by the Terms. ( See Schwartz Decl., Ex. A at §§ 16.2, 16. 3.); see also Young v.
Facebook, Inc., 5: 10- CV-03579- JF/PVT, 2010 WL 4269304, at * 4 ( N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2010)
The plaintiff' s] first contention is without merit because, as noted above, Facebook expressly
disclaimed any duty to protect users' online safety"). Because Facebook had no duty to Plaintiff
to prevent others from posting content that Plaintiff finds objectionable or for guaranteeing that
content posted by Plaintiff would not be removed, Plaintiffs negligence claim fails."

"Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. The elements of intentional infliction of
emotional distress are: "( 1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention
of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; ( 2) the
plaintiffs suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and ( 3) actual and proximate causation
of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct." Christensen v. Superior Court,
54 Cal. 3d 868, 903 ( 1991) ( citations omitted). " Conduct to be outrageous must be so extreme as
to exceed all bounds of that usually tolerated in a civilized community." Id. (citing Davidson v.
City of Westminster, 32 Cal. 3d 197, 209 ( 1982).) The defendant must have engaged in " conduct
intended to inflict injury or engaged in with the realization that injury will result."

-With this kicker of a sentence to sum up the essence of Bill Windsor:  
"That Plaintiff disagrees with Facebook' s decisions does not mean that Facebook' s behavior was " false," " malicious," or outrageous."

In response to Tortious Interference:
"In addition, because Plaintiff described the Page as about a movie that is still in production with no known release date, there can be no economic damage resulting from its removal."
You don't understand, all of his cases are based on that faulty premise....if you take that one away all he has left is Barbara left me because someone said meanie things about me.

In relation to Fraud:
"Not only are Plaintiff' s general conclusory allegations insufficient
to satisfy general fact pleading standards, but they are unquestionably deficient in satisfying the
heightened pleading standards required for fraud and other fraud -based claims, such as Plaintiff' s
unfair business practices claim."
Don't you know that Bill Windsor is smarter than all of the lawyers out there?  He is on a level you just can't even begin to comprehend Julie.

On Unfair Business Practice:
"Plaintiff' s allegations similarly do not plead an " unfair" practice. An act or practice is
unfair if (l) the consumer injury is substantial; ( 2) the injury is not outweighed by any
countervailing benefits to consumers or competition; and ( 3) the injury is not one that consumers
themselves could not reasonably have avoided."
-Those sound like really high marks to reach, can't we just all agree to the Windsor Rules of Court and say that if Bill said he had a business and that business was harmed.....thats good enough for court?

Ms. Schwartz sums all of this up nicely with this zinger for Bill:
"When Plaintiffs hyperbolic characterizations are removed, at most, Plaintiff alleges that
he disagreed with Facebook' s decision to remove the Page. And protection from spurious claims
of wrongful removal is exactly what the CDA was implemented to protect."

Once again, when you remove all the histrionics....all that is left is spurious allegations.

John Darash Rolls Out Educational Requirements

On the National Liberty Alliance (NLA or New Lawless America) weekly call, John Darash continued to chide this followers as it seems they are making no progress.  Darash decided to institute a curriculum which will now be a requirment to be one of the leaders in his group.  This is when Darash slowly moves himself out to pasture, the very same pasture that David Schied has been grazing in for years.  Both David and John are true believers and as such they have immersed themselves in to the study of the cause they believe in.  But what they fail to see is that they are the exception to this group of vigilantes that call themselves Me the People.  Most of these people are like Bill, they joined as a way to eventually right their perceived legal wrongs, they have no time for lectures and courses....this is vigilante justice, take it by hook, crook or default.  For them its personal, for John and David its corporate.

Darash explained that this new requirement will separate the serious folks from the pretenders, but I'm afraid he is not going to be happy with that result.  He feels the need to do something as he hears anecdotal stories of some of his followers convening a citizen grand jury at the local Denny's and convicting people.  Come on people, you have to rent out a conference room and send out at least 3 chain linked email notices two weeks in advance.  Jefferson must be rolling in his grave....and not the one in Colombia Missouri....Bill.

So on to the update, well the latest judge sent them back a ruling saying we don't play that game.....they indicted him and took those papers to the Sheriff.  The Sheriff said can you please take care of your own trash, I'm not accepting that.  Then its on the to clerk who says go talk to the DA who tells them he won't accept that but they can appeal.  Frustrated, Darash pulled the plug and decided to start all over now in the Federal courts.  So now he is hoping for a hearing on the 29th in a fed court in Albany.

The NLA is suffering from a lack of a dictator.  Darash had to spend a considerable amount of time trying to urge his fellow state coordinators to weed out the malcontents themselves as he didn't want to be the one getting involved in doing other States' yard work for them.  And so continues the cycle of all these vigilante justice groups, they invariably end up eating their own as they fall from within with a lack of structure while trying to destroy our current legal system.  The real damage, though, is to the people like Mary B who is clearly lost and needs guidance....and in fact is reaching out for that guidance, these groups poison her head even more so than it already is and then discard her like leftover trash when she becomes a nuisance to them.

National Liberty Alliance Puts on its Tin Foil Hats

First lets cover our good ole Mary B.  Just like with her time in LA, she has worn out her welcome over at the NLA as her local Connecticut group simply can't tolerate any more of her rants.  So they voted to remove her.....ahh but by what authority can they do this?  Mary took to NLA's confusing message system at the bottom of the website to air her grievances.  John Darash even had to take a moment to chide the use of messages on the website as a distraction by "back biters".  Mary said this:

"I am going to find out the legal authority your web page had to go in and edit and delete my personal profile. what is the point of having a password if your admin simply goes in and alters what is written at random will. your actions have caused grave concern regarding your integrity and honor to support all of God's laws and people equitably and with the honor for which you speak but have not acted at all in this regard! Your biased discrimatory actions against me must find remedy from established leadership that is sorely lacking!"

I'm with Mary B....how can they?  This is the problem when you play children's games and then expect someone to reign people in when the get off the reservation.  Who are you to tell me my unicorn is any more far fetched than your magic dragon? 

Indeed, this is a bigger problem for Darash as he had to spend the first 30 mins of his show explaining how his group is different from the people trying to place liens against judges in the name of the universal commercial code or UCC.  You see that idea is just stupid, only made up citizen grand juries is legit, they have the youtube videos to prove it.

NLA is stuck in the mud at this point, they have not "constituted" any more states and it doesn't appear that any will be in the near future.  This is predictable as Darash missed his showdown with the court dates and now the infighting and finger pointing will commence. 

The interesting part of the show was how they brought out the trusty tin foil hats.  We heard about chemtrails, HAARP, and how smart meters are killing our bees.  Believe it or not, one of the key threads to being a member of the NLA is to be a deep seated conspiracy theorist.....show shocked face.  In the end, the NLA will become what Bill's suspended facebook page is now becoming, just a free advertising board for all these peoples crazy ideas.

Bill Windsor Files his Writ of Ignoramus

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_iVXLgv5gBBWFdCd295TVFWM1U/edit?usp=sharing

After reading Judge Solis' order to pay the $46 filing fee and hear what Solis thinks of him, Bill decided to protest paying the $46 by filing a $500 case with the US 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That's right, Bill just dropped the legal equivalent of a nuclear bomb in his Texas case.  Bill needs this "emergency" motion because he claims that Judge Fitzwater and Solis' slow and then disheartening responses are damaging his vexatious behavior.

Windsor's convoluted argument seems to be based on his claim that Judge Fitzwater/Solis have no jurisdiction over him since State Courts and Federal Courts are separate (repeat that 10 times). The problem for Bill is that he seems to understand the authority when he wrote his two, if you don't say no I will take that as a yes, letters to Judge Fitzwater's office.  Then you have the additional factor of Judge Bob Carroll, in the State Court, saying that Bill had to get leave from the Fed.

No Windsor filing would be complete without a straight up lie:
"70.  Windsor has already had one party dismissed in the Ellis County lawsuit, and if Judge Fitzwater/and or Solis does not act, all will be dismissed.  This is an emergency"

No Bill, that's a lie.  Non-party Google was dismissed but no party has been.

If he pays the $46, Bill thinks that will give Solis personal jurisdiction over him, and he doesn't want to deal with that.  Instead, he spends the majority of his 41 page filling lecturing everyone on how Judge Thrash doesn't know the law, rules, and is corrupt because he wouldn't recuse himself. Judge Thrash has "foreclosed" on Windsor's ability to wield his paper terrorism across the Nation.You can almost hear Judge Thrash responding with a sigh "that was the point".

In the end, Bill is trying to paint himself as some kind of Constitutional martyr.  But too bad for him, no one cares.  Anyone that reviews his history will see exactly why the courts had to take the action that they did. Bill is always complaining about his rights but its the rights of everyone else that are being trampled in his vexatious fury.

National Liberty Alliance Cancels Again

Me the People's take back of their country has been derailed again.  John Darash told his followers Monday that the big showdown this Thrusday in a NY court has been cancelled because the judge responded to their charges with "no thanks, I don't play games".  They have no standing, they have no injured party, but that is news to them because they are not sitting down and they feel hurt. So just when you think they are at their Writs' end, they plan to file another one...a Writ of Error and felony rescue against this judge.  So once again....wash, rinse and repeat.  Darash told his followers that he is way to busy to read any emails, he just simply can't do it, and he has lost many emails that he didn't mean too by being liberal with his delete button. He has invested everything into this endeavor and is broke, sorry family....kinda let you down on that one.

Darash then moved on to the problem of the subverter's in his ranks.  Even though they are an anarchist group, he thinks everyone should follow his rules.  Ideas like giving up your driver's license or not voting is just asinine to him and the NLA.  Only his crazy idea shall be followed and all others are considered a waste of time and the work of "subverters"   Thou shalt not have any other frauds before me is the basic order Darash is striking down here.

Bill's Trial By Facebook gets Stayed

Since he can't seem to get anywhere in court, Bill has decided to try his case on his facebook account as he libels and defames all kinds of people he doesn't know, and and they don't know him either.  Not only is his lawsuit against Facebook not going too well, now his trial by facebook has been suspended as he is locked out of his account. Yep, he did it again, he violated the rules and now he can't post anything for 30 days. This must be some kind of violation of his Constitutional rights.

Where will he go to stalk and harass people if he can't post it on the internet?  Will this bring about a new lawsuit against Facebook?  Will his victims find out about his defamation of them?  Is it time to pretend he is getting that skull surgery he has been threatening?  Is there even anyone left that will follow him?

National Liberty Alliance Prepares for Battle

In the weekly call for the NLA, John Darash announced that they have constituted 10 States now.  But his tone was decidedly frustrated as he lashed out at his listeners pointing out how they had no excuse not to constitute the rest of the Country in the next two weeks.  He even said you don't have to file the papers, just stick them in your desk.  He reiterated that they are holding to the April 24 date at the Green County Courthouse in NY.  Darash mentioned that they will take back their Country, or die trying.

Davash then moved on to the topic of donations, and broke down just how little $5 a month amounts to and that if everyone just did that they would have a much better website.  He was also frustrated with the low amount of orders for his jurist pocket handbook.  How can they take their Country back if they can't even get 10,000 orders of the $.65 pocket books?  Darash sounded like he was at the point Bill was in last year when he said "if only I had an RV this would be a lot easier".

The plan for the 24th was further ironed out as Darash said after their flooding of the courtroom on the morning of the 24th, they would then get in a couple of buses and drive up to Albany to meet up with Bob Shultz (of the Me the People fame) and team up with him in similar stunt he is trying in the court in Albany.

The frustration in Davash's tone is a key indicator that his movement is starting to slip away.  Once he backed out of his April 7th stunt, the air went out of his balloon.  Now he is trying to recapture it on the 24th but if he can't show his followers something tangible, they will all start to move on.

Comment Overflow

Windsor Melts Down, Admits He is a Fraud

With all his legal endeavours collapsing on him, Bill took to his facebook page in an effort of revisionist history.  He lashed at out Sean Fleming for putting Bill's words in his mouth, specificity his plan to form citizen grand juries and use them to try officials for treason.  Well lets look at the facts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX7fcVe2wy4

Seems pretty clear cut, surely he isn't pretending he didn't say and send all that?  This was in the comments under his meltdown post last night with his new #2 (of 2) Susan:

Susan Harbison Bill, Fleming and some of the other GENII indicate you propose the formation of citizen grand juries which would hold criminal trials and sentence the convicted. Is that statement true or false? Did you propose that the citizens grand jury could impose the death sentence and somehow see that it was carried out? I never heard you suggest such a radical plan but there are those that insist they did hear it. ???

Bill Windsor No, Susan, I never said any such thing. I never said any jury of any type could impose a death sentence and somehow carry it out. I spoke many times about the fact that citizens grand juries were worthless because no one pays attention to what they do. What I presented was a way for people to go to the county/ state and federal grand juries with their criminal complaints, and I shared the list of criminal statutes that I researched and determined to be possible. There have always been links to this information onwww.LawlessAmerica.com. At one time, I used the term "citizens grand juries" (unfortunate choice of words since I feel they are a joke) as to something I proposed that could be done if the government grand juries could not be reached, but that was to be like the case review that the New Hampshire legislature has done. It would have no power, but it would be a way to highlight injustice and alleged wrongdoing. There were never any details discussed about that. These Joeyisalittlekid people have no evidence of any of this outrageous stuff they say.

10 hours ago  Like  1

Susan Harbison OMG, all this time from what I read on Joey I thought you were a proponent of citizen grand juries! So you were really just trying to help people REACH legitimate grand juries to try to get indictments? Incredible.

10 hours ago  Like

Bill Windsor They knew the truth. there are multiple looong TalkShoe shows about this. There are links on the home page of www.LawlessAmerica.com about this.

9 hours ago  Like  1

Bill Windsor There is a video where I used the term "citizens grand juries." That was a bad use of words by me. All the TalkShoe shows will show that my thought was never defined. My ideas had been made crystal clear, and there is massive proof of the grand juryeffort being the county/state and federal government-sanctioned grand juries. They then take the fact that I feel the death penalty should be abolished except for treason to be that a jury would find that death should be the penalty for treason. Treason is punishable now by prison and with the possibility of death as a sentence. I never ever said I wanted people to be sentenced to death. In fact, I joked about some of the victims volunteering to work for free at the prisons where the traitors would be put (if a legal jury found them guilty). I never planned executions and murder and all this garbage that these sick people have written. And the only way to get new people in office is to have them elected; that's how it works in America. Since these cyberstalkers cannot produce videos or audios or stories where I said I was going to kill people or have them executed, they have a big, big problem. Accusing someone of being a killer, murderer, executioner is defamation to the extreme.

9 hours ago  Like  3

Now, obviously we have the clear fact that his pants are on fire.  He lied, he didn't just misspeak one time on video.....no he made that the crux of his threatening letter to Congress (where he stole their seal too).  He can't run from his past, but he sure is trying.  I want to highlight another fact that he just gave away in his meltdown.......Bill admitted that what he was preaching to his followers was "worthless, waste of time, and a joke".  That is exactly why I call him a fraud, he doesn't even believe in what he is proposing.  Its all an illusion intended to scam his audience.  Last night, Bill said that very thing.  Its not defamation if its true.

Windsor Won't Pay the Filing Fees

The Texas case is currently stayed, but that would be news to Bill as he keeps filing away as if nothing changed.  The case is stayed while they wait for word from the Federal Judge on the vexatious litigant status of Bill and his lame attempt at circumventing the order.  Yesterday, Judge Solis issued an order:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=ohpwua&s=8#.U0WQ3vldXUV
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=rcnigk&s=8#.U0WQr_ldXUV

Judge Solis isn't interested in beating around the bush and the opening line says it all:  "William Windsor is a vexatious litigant with a track record for filing frivolous lawsuits and, once those frivolous suits are filed, filing legions of frivolous motions."

History repeats itself, because that's exactly what he is currently doing in all his frivolous cases across the Country right now.  Now its going to take Bill several months and a small forest of trees to object to that first line, but Judge Solis gives Bill another hay-maker in the second line:
"In July 2011, the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia entered an injunction against Windsor, prohibiting him “from filing any complaint or
initiating any proceeding, in any court (state or federal) or agency in the United States without
first obtaining leave of a federal district court in the district in which the new complaint or
proceeding is to be filed.”

Honorable?  Bill has already declared Judge Thrash "massively corrupt" and Bill went ahead and voided his order.  You can feel Bill's hand shaking just reading this.  Then, Judge Solis addresses Bill's little sneaky attempt to get around the order with his game of "if you don't say no I will take that as a yes".

"On November 21, 2013, Windsor sent a letter to Chief Judge Sidney Fitzwater seeking
permission to file a suit in Texas state court. Doc. 2 at 4. In it, he stated that “[I]f I do not hear
from you by December 7, I will assume that you did not disapprove.” Doc. 2 at 4. On February
25, 2014, Windsor sent a letter to Judge Fitzwater’s judicial secretary stating the he “accepted no
response from Judge Fitzwater as ‘leave’ to file as [he] stated [he] would do in [his] letter.”

Oh no, they are on to you Bill.  And we see just how much in the footnote at the bottom of page one:

"Windsor appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but the appeal was dismissed “for want of prosecution because the appellant… failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court.” Windsor, Certified Copy of Order at 1, Sep. 15, 2011, ECF No. 119."

The ghost of Bill's legal past is coming back to haunt him.

"On March 15, Windsor submitted another letter to Judge Fitzwater’s chambers again seeking leave to pursue a state court lawsuit. Doc. 1 at 2. At that point, the issue was referred to the clerk’s office to be filed as a miscellaneous matter.
To this point, Windsor has not paid the filing fee to the Clerk of the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Court will not address Windsor’s request for leave
until he has paid the filing fee. Windsor is directed to pay the Clerk $46.00 filing fee or file a
motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 21 days of the date of this order or the case will be
dismissed for want of prosecution."

Fool them once, shame on you, fool them twice....contempt for you.  Now Bill has a very tough decision to make with his $46....pay it and hear what he knows he is going to hear?  Or just file a bunch of objections and try and sue Judge Solis?  Are we now about to enter the phase were this millionaire starts complaining about how he can't pay his filing fees......or...spoiler alert, defendant attorney fees?

John Darash Moves His Own Goal Post

On last night's call for the National Liberty Alliance, John Darash revealed that he had a little chat with the local DA, and it seems now that the date of the 22nd needs to be moved to the ??th.  The NLA tried to prosecute the local clerk for not letting them take their country back, aka you didn't file my made up documents in time.  It seems an anarchist group can be stopped dead in their tracks by a technicality of a court clerk.  The DA told them that he couldn't prosecute because there is no law or statute on the books that she violated.....to which Darash told him that "there are lots of laws that are not on the books".  Anyway, leaving the meeting, it dawned on Darash that even if he gets the local Sheriff to make arrests, he is never going to get the DA to prosecute them. This 4th grade level revelation to John of our legal process led him to proclaim to his followers that this is a game of chess.

So now, they don't know what to do, or at least John is not going to discuss his plans on air.  One caller said this must end with citizen arrest to which John's co-host quickly said "exactly" before John cut him off. Gerard, the co-host, confirmed that the NLA had been advised by authorities that what they are proposing is considered paper terrorism to which he responded that it was the authorities that are the terrorists.

Darash tried to reassure the audience that all wasn't lost as he had two huge announcements to make:  1.  He has changed the jurist oath to a jurist vow, and 2.  They had secured their Jurist pocket booklet that can be purchased for $.65 a piece.  This little booklet would help free the people into realizing that they are all Me The People.  Darash tried to incentivize his followers by pointing out that if they purchased 1,000 copies, the price would lower to $.60.

The main problem now for John and the NLA is that they are quickly becoming Lawless America II. Just like when Bill was setting dates a year ago, now John is having to back off and change his.  If he wants people to continue to join and hit the donate button, he is going to have to show them he isn't just the flavor of the month.  Everyone was showing up and giving him attention because he was standing at the edge of the cliff about to jump but claiming he had mastered human flight. Now he is saying "hold on, I don't like this wind direction" and much of his audience will move on to the next big flash in the pan.  Windsor's followers started dropping in droves when he kept pushing back his big dates, starting with April Fools day and then on to May Day.  Now Darash, and his NLA are on the same path to irrelevancy.

National Liberty Alliance's Quo Warranto

So the flood the courts event that was to take place on the 7th, and been moved to the 22nd, derives its power from its own issued document found here http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Quo%20Waranto%20filed%203-24-14.pdf

Besides all the SovCit lectures, the sovereign People make the laws (repeat that 28 times), this call of action gives us a peek into what these Me the People groups feel is due process under their new made up law.

"YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer, by paper, and IN PERSON this 
endorsed summons in the New York Supreme Court, Columbia County, Courthouse; located at 
621 State Route 23B; Claverack, New York, 12513; on the 7th day of April, 2014 at 9:30 AM; 
Upon your failure to answer it will be interpreted as contempt of court and an admission of 
willful intent engaging in criminal activity against the People of New York, an arrest warrant 
will be issued and judgment will be taken against you for the relief demanded in quo warranto"

-In their new america, failure to appear isn't just failure to appear, its "and admission of wilful intent engaging in criminal activity against the People" 

Well, so how about giving the accused a chance to properly prepare to defend themselves against these criminal charges?

"This is a common Law procedure executed Coram Nobis, the Magistrate has “NO” authority to 
approve requests for time extensions or postpone said summons, grand jurist will be laying aside 
all business and will be traveling from across the state, likewise is expected of the accused. 
This procedure is for a show-cause to the criminal allegations presented by the extraordinary 
writ, Quo Warranto, demanding that the Peoples’ stewards give account of their stewardship, 
therefore “NO” motions will be considered, ANSWERS ARE DEMANDED." 

-Nope, no time to prepare, no time to read up on your defense....you must appear at the date they supply and no motions will be granted for extensions.....for any reason.

Well what horrible crime have these public servants been accused of?

"New York Unified Common Law Grand Jury, hereinafter the People, come against the STATE 

OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT charging Jonathan Lippman, Fern A. Fisher, Lawrence 

K. Marks, Barry Kamins, and Ronald Younkins for neglect to prevent conspiracy and felony rescue; concerning the indictments; against A. Gail Prudenti, Michael V. Coccoma , C. 

Randall Hinrichs, Allan, D Scheinkman, Charles M. Tailleur, Michelle Carrol, and Terry 

Wilhelm; hereinafter wrongdoers in this court of record proceeding according to the common 

law"

-So these servants are accused of neglecting to prevent a conspiracy.  So in their new america, you can be guilty of a crime by not stopping others from committing one.

Ok, so they have no time to prepare for these criminal charges at least they have the right to be represented by licensed and trained attorney?

"This is a common law proceeding, appearing before the People themselves, to answer to the 

People the writ quo warranto, directed upon New York State Judicial Executive branch 

servants: Personal appearances required, failure to appear will be consider contempt of court 

and subject to arrest. Said servants have a duty to speak without attorneys."

-Can someone explain to me at this point how this differs from the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition?

Well at least this is still some form of America, you are still at least presumed innocent until proven guilty right?

"If wrongdoers Jonathan Lippman, Fern A. Fisher, Lawrence K. Marks, Barry Kamins , and 

Ronald Younkins confess that they have error and proceed to inform the sixty-two clerks of the 

court to call upon the custodians of the courthouse to make provisions to receive the sovereign 

People to their rightful place within the courthouse a reprieve from the said charges against them 

will be granted. The sovereign People have no desire to seek out and prosecute past 

wrongdoings, we desire only to look forward and work with our servants to heal our land."

-ummmm, you are supposed to call them the accused, calling them "wrongdoes" kinda tips your hand at just how fair this little trial is.  So the deal is...."wrongdoers", if you bow to Me the People and turn over you duly appointed/elected office to the "People", we will drop the charges.  What a deal!!!!