National Liberty Alliance's Quo Warranto

So the flood the courts event that was to take place on the 7th, and been moved to the 22nd, derives its power from its own issued document found here http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/Quo%20Waranto%20filed%203-24-14.pdf

Besides all the SovCit lectures, the sovereign People make the laws (repeat that 28 times), this call of action gives us a peek into what these Me the People groups feel is due process under their new made up law.

"YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer, by paper, and IN PERSON this 
endorsed summons in the New York Supreme Court, Columbia County, Courthouse; located at 
621 State Route 23B; Claverack, New York, 12513; on the 7th day of April, 2014 at 9:30 AM; 
Upon your failure to answer it will be interpreted as contempt of court and an admission of 
willful intent engaging in criminal activity against the People of New York, an arrest warrant 
will be issued and judgment will be taken against you for the relief demanded in quo warranto"

-In their new america, failure to appear isn't just failure to appear, its "and admission of wilful intent engaging in criminal activity against the People" 

Well, so how about giving the accused a chance to properly prepare to defend themselves against these criminal charges?

"This is a common Law procedure executed Coram Nobis, the Magistrate has “NO” authority to 
approve requests for time extensions or postpone said summons, grand jurist will be laying aside 
all business and will be traveling from across the state, likewise is expected of the accused. 
This procedure is for a show-cause to the criminal allegations presented by the extraordinary 
writ, Quo Warranto, demanding that the Peoples’ stewards give account of their stewardship, 
therefore “NO” motions will be considered, ANSWERS ARE DEMANDED." 

-Nope, no time to prepare, no time to read up on your defense....you must appear at the date they supply and no motions will be granted for extensions.....for any reason.

Well what horrible crime have these public servants been accused of?

"New York Unified Common Law Grand Jury, hereinafter the People, come against the STATE 

OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT charging Jonathan Lippman, Fern A. Fisher, Lawrence 

K. Marks, Barry Kamins, and Ronald Younkins for neglect to prevent conspiracy and felony rescue; concerning the indictments; against A. Gail Prudenti, Michael V. Coccoma , C. 

Randall Hinrichs, Allan, D Scheinkman, Charles M. Tailleur, Michelle Carrol, and Terry 

Wilhelm; hereinafter wrongdoers in this court of record proceeding according to the common 

law"

-So these servants are accused of neglecting to prevent a conspiracy.  So in their new america, you can be guilty of a crime by not stopping others from committing one.

Ok, so they have no time to prepare for these criminal charges at least they have the right to be represented by licensed and trained attorney?

"This is a common law proceeding, appearing before the People themselves, to answer to the 

People the writ quo warranto, directed upon New York State Judicial Executive branch 

servants: Personal appearances required, failure to appear will be consider contempt of court 

and subject to arrest. Said servants have a duty to speak without attorneys."

-Can someone explain to me at this point how this differs from the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition?

Well at least this is still some form of America, you are still at least presumed innocent until proven guilty right?

"If wrongdoers Jonathan Lippman, Fern A. Fisher, Lawrence K. Marks, Barry Kamins , and 

Ronald Younkins confess that they have error and proceed to inform the sixty-two clerks of the 

court to call upon the custodians of the courthouse to make provisions to receive the sovereign 

People to their rightful place within the courthouse a reprieve from the said charges against them 

will be granted. The sovereign People have no desire to seek out and prosecute past 

wrongdoings, we desire only to look forward and work with our servants to heal our land."

-ummmm, you are supposed to call them the accused, calling them "wrongdoes" kinda tips your hand at just how fair this little trial is.  So the deal is...."wrongdoers", if you bow to Me the People and turn over you duly appointed/elected office to the "People", we will drop the charges.  What a deal!!!!

National Liberty Alliance Says April Fool

John Darash and his domestic terrorist group, National Liberty Alliance, had set the date of April 7th as the day they would "flood the court" and assume control of the legal and judicial system in New York.  Well before this Me the People group takes over the country, well they ran into a road block.  Seems the court clerk didn't file their papers timely and we must now wait till the 22nd (tentatively) to "take our Country back".  The NLA is also having trouble removing people who want to be removed from their email list.

Nevertheless, once these issues are ironed out, there is nothing left to stop them from taking back their country.  Darash plans to accomplish this by taking "charges" to the local sheriff, he then assumes that the sheriff will take him up on those charges and arrest people.  If the sheriff refuses, they will indict the sheriff and then go to the under sheriff with the same threat.  The ironic part is these people are trying to take us back to the King of England days all in the name of liberty.   They have decided to give themselves the ultimate power of the people and claim that they, the few nut-cases playing dress up, will decide the law. They plan to get their point across by doing things such as when the "all rise" order is given when the judge comes to the bench, they plan to stay seated.

Darash said its time to drawn a line in the sand and cross over it.  When callers ask him about what happens when they refuse to take action and ignore his little made up indictment, John said he can't talk about it but he has plans after that.  He also alluded to a super secret corporate charter.....but quickly had the class repeat the first two rules of fight club.  The court clerk may have given Darash a reprieve from incarceration, but his time in prison seems to be close at hand with his current course of impersonating a somebody.

Windsor Tries To Do Math

MAGNITUDE OF THE CYBERSTALKING aka simple blogging AGAINST WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

I know some of you aren't interested in my battles against cyberstalkers actually no one is. But unfortunately, it is currently the most important issue to me personally so you gave up huh? -- more important than than the effort to expose government and judicial corruption especially since you were not really going to do that anyway. Until this is resolved, I cannot accomplish much with corruption issues you didn't accomplish one single thing before it, not one tangible accomplishment.

You might be interested to know the magnitude 7.2? or even higher? of the defamation and cyberstalking. There have been 455 published articles on Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com ummm, you pinky swore to the court that there was 320 articles posted as of Jan 7 2014, and there has been less than 30 since, you just called yourself a liar. plus 44,362 published statements by 681 screen names, 95% of which are anonymous I think you missed a few, go count again. Based on my calculations, there are 3,312,027 words in the 455 articles and comments given your kind of "calculations" I can see why the IRS would need some further information from you. According to a study mentioned in Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use, the average person writes 19 words-per-minute when composing. This means 174,317 hours were spent by the 681 screen names as they composed ok so 174,000/681=255 hours over a two year period which equals 1.5% of their time, thats about right Bill, you take up about 1.5% of my time, maybe 2%. There are 8,760 hours in a 365-day year its almost April Bill, you shouldn't be able to read, much less do math, what will Uncle Sam think?. This means 20 years of 24/7 time was spent composing plus an untold number of years spent reading by the 681 "people uhhh, now you lost me." The average adult reads prose text at 250 to 300 words per minute but in this case we are reading cons. While proofreading materials, people are able to read at 200 wpm on paper, and 180 wpm on a monitor. Assuming 180 words-per-minute for me whoa whoa....you think you are anywhere close to "average"?, it will take me 306.67 hours JUST to read what has been written and at least 408,579 hours to understand it. Assuming I can stay at it eight hours a day why just 8? You have nothing else to do, you just said it, lets bump that up to at least 14, it will take two-and-a-half months for me to do a first read all the hands go up at this point....shouldn't you have read it before you filed it in the court and called it defamation?  Or is this like the Minority Report thing where you know its defamation even before you read it?. Joeyisalittlekid is just one of the blogs what blogs?  there is more blogs with this name?. I have identified dozens of them "dozens" is a word liars use to say I didn't really count. Then there are videos and talkshoes. One of the defendants, Sean D. Fleming, has 561 videos of his own on his YouTube site oh yeah, from the Sean Fleming Show. There are perhaps 700 or more videos and radio programs that need to be reviewed, many of which have been hidden from me. And I have no way to determine the identity of these people without court orders or law enforcement intervention and you will never get that so is this you waiving the white flag finally?. 

In Texas, I cannot find a reported case that is ANYTHING like my case thats because they get thrown out immediately. If anyone knows of a defamation case anywhere in history I think US courts usually like to cite US cases, taking it to the world court now are we? involving this much stuff, I'd love to know about it. Maybe I can read up on any such cases "in my spare time." hahahaha, that is so funny

Then in the comments section, we get some tinfoil Billy:
Bill Windsor How could a group of people justify spending 20 years of time publishing comments defaming me and others? I just have to wonder if someone hasn't paid some or all of these people.

Windsor Can't Stop Himself in Montana

Bill can't take no for an answer.  So after losing in MT, then losing his appeal, its time to go to the Montana Supreme Court as he is requesting supervisory control, with control being the one thing that continues to elude him.

Windsor thinks this is deserved because the judges are corrupt, Boushie is a serial liar, and he forgot to alphabetize his table of contents.  But here is what really fries his circuit board:

30. Judge Larson also issued an order placing filing restrictions on
Windsor. The filing restrictions injunction is outrageous. [APPELLANT'S BRIEF
in DA-13-0785, Exhibit#21.] [Exhibit#22,165; Exhibit#24,165.] There has been
no finding of anything that Windsor has filed that was frivolous or improper. No
court in Ravalli County or Missoula County made any such finding, nor could any
honest judge so claim. This issuance of the injunction was done in complete denial
of due process to Windsor. Windsor received no notice or opportunity to be heard.
Windsor does not have $50,000, so the requirement of $50,000 BOND deprives
Windsor of any ability to ever file a lawsuit against this judge and the other corrupt
judges and judicial employees who Windsor intends to sue and intends to seek a
grand jury to bring criminal charges against the corrupt judges, corrupt court
employees, and corrupt law enforcement officials. There was no show cause order
issued to Windsor, and Windsor was not given an opportunity to be heard on this
matter as is required by law. Meaningful access to the courts is a Constitutional
right that has been denied by DC, and this alleged ORDER denies significant
rights. [APPELLANT'S BRIEF in DA-13-0785, Exhibit#21, RECORD.]

Its like we are in a time warp, this could just as easily be Judge Duffy in Georgia and the year is 2012.  Bill's "rats" have been violated because he has to post $50,000 which he most certainly does have but doesn't want to post, so he thinks he no longer has meaningful access to the courts.  Meaningful being the operative word here.  Bill has had more access to the courts than thousands of people put together.  There is nothing meaningful about any of his filings as they are all copy and paste jobs of his previous frivolous filings.

Notice also Bill's terminology....he didn't say before a jury, he said he intends to bring these judges before a grand jury.  He doesn't want to let John Darash and the National Liberty Alliance steal all his fun, he wants to play judge, jury and executioner as well.

The National Liberty Alliance Stole Bill's Pie

As Bill continues to scream and demand attention, the fact of the matter is his lemmings have moved on. John Darash has been able to gain the attention Bill has yet to get, in just a few months.  Darash has taken over the controls of the Me The People movement and isn't playing games.  Unlike Bill, he really is a 99%, he doesn't have two mansions and over $1 million saved up in a retirement account to fall back on.  He is just a mere carpenter.  He doesn't seem to have a personal vendetta either.  To Darash, this isn't a game, he isn't scamming people, he is a true believer.  Darash also adds a religious twist to his movement that gives it "extra" authority on top of his citizen grand juries and Common Law.  Darash is a Harold Camping disciple http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Camping so we know he doesn't posses an iota of discernment, which, the lack thereof, is a prized asset in the Me The People community.

Darash comes from the Oathkeeper movement but after forming his National Liberty Alliance (he did a better job than you Bill in picking a name) http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/ he has begun to execute on the plan Bill had set out a year ago.  John is taking over the Country, county by county and claims to already have the State of New York with 67 counties in Florida.  He also claims to have three world powers backing him too in UK, Canada and Australia.  What do you have Bill?  Just some youtube videos?  Darash is targeting all the county elected sheriffs as he demands they take action on his made up citizen grand jury charges.  He even has his own seal and everything, you couldn't even register your movement's name Bill.

This Darash guy is proving to be what they had hoped for in Bill.  Bill's lemmings are flocking to him as even old Niki gave Bill the link to the new movement and said he could call in and listen to their blogtalk shows....I pause for the irony.  Bob Shultz, Jon Roland and even David Schied have moved on to this new Davash guy. When David was being questioned by the FBI, it was the National Liberty Alliance website, not LA, that David told the agent to go check out to get some "education".  Poor old Mary B now writes her daily affirmations about her new hope, the NLA.

All along, they have been looking for someone like this.  They have plenty of creative writers, they have a script, supporting cast, and even a stunt man.  What they lack is a lead actor that will get them the media attention they desire.  Darash is proving to be that person as his citizen grand juries are getting the attention of the local media and the FBI.  John is a quoteist, in that he uses out of context quotes from many of our Founding Fathers to fit his current purpose.  Its not about him, its about the cause.  The nobodies believe in him because they can sense that he really is one of them, not an actor like Bill.  He is focused, specific, and on target and most importantly he seems motivated to do something instead of just endless chatter. Obviously, all these factors make John exceptionally dangerous and is why he has the attention of the FBI. But for the time being, he is their new William Wallace...not another William Windsor.  Bill had his shot, and he blew it.  Now they all move on as Bill continues to scream and cry like a baby who just lost his candy.

Bill Puts Barbara Windsor Front and Center

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQSW2nlhL-E&list=UUi_3bMXuLoFtRf3Od_HGVJg

Sean Fleming, of course from the Sean Fleming Show, has another great video where he shows the direct deception that Bill has engaged in.  As Sean points out, most scam artists choose the State of Delaware to incorporate their organization because it gives them a year to report specific information.  Well its been over a year now since LA was incorporated, and guess what?  No annual filings have been done as required by law.

Sean then goes on to discuss the Barbara Windsor connection as she is the only named director of Lawless America.  She claims in her divorce filings that she never had anything to do with LA, and then reiterates it in a recent email to Sean (or at least from an address appearing to be from Barb as it sounded very Bill-like in its response).  Bill is also putting Barbara right in the middle of every single one of his frivolousness lawsuits right now as he lists her divorcing him as one of the reasons he is due damages.  She also knows full well why Bill can't speak to his granddaughters and it has nothing to do with some blog  How much longer can she do the Windsor thing and hide from her obligations?  Will she forever be known as Mrs. Bill Windsor, or will she finally stand up to Bill and his lies and tell the truth?

Bill Windsor Defies Judge Carroll's Direct Orders

While Bill has gone quiet, at least in talking to his lemmings, he has stayed busy with his paper terrorism. First, in the Bill vs. The World case, there was the hearing with Google in which Bill was told not to file anything more until he got leave from Federal Judge Fitzwater.  Google correctly argued that they should be dismissed under the Communications Decency Act as they are not a responsible third party content.  Judge Carroll mentioned that this was the case and as soon as the case resumed, Google would be dismissed.

Well apparently this was one of those days where Bill had trouble hearing, kinda like how he can't read during tax season.  He then filed an 82 page answer to the objection by Google which was unobjectionable. It seems that Google and Judge Carroll can't quite understand the CDA the correct way that Bill does.  Then he files a 376 page affidavit all related to Sean Boushie and is simply a copy and paste job of his failed legal efforts in Montana.  You know, the one where the Appellate Court called him specious?

That got Judge Carroll's attention and he issued a stay as well as affirmed Google's special exception.  The stay would be in effect while the Court takes time to review the vexatious litigant ruling by Judge Thrash as well as all the legal ramifications related to it.  In short, if Bill's reputation didn't already proceed him, his actions quickly made it clear why he has this special legal definition behind him.

Bill Windsor Tries to Scrub His Past

Bill Windsor never lies, as he reminds everyone repeatedly.  But one important component to that statement is the ability to erase everything he has said in the past.  Late last night, Bill sent out a plea to his followers for spying, but this time its to spy on himself.  You see those over 100 talkshoe shows of him blabbering on and on may have statements in them that contradict what Bill has already sworn in court that he never said.  You see, all those "haters" are lying about me, but just in case I'm gonna need to review and edit all the shows that I did where I spoke about grand juries, 501 c3 non- profits, proposed legislation (I never did that did I?), donations....oh and I forgot all the different things I said about the fake movie.

If Bill Windsor never lied then he has no reason to worry about all those talkshoe shows.  But he did, and now he does have to worry.  Oh and anything anyone else said is not important, only what Bill says....but then again we already knew that didn't we?

Lawless America a Non-Prophet?

I guess Bill should have seen this coming when he scrambled to sign up his Lawless America as a non-profit.  Sean Fleming, you know from the Sean Fleming Show, has a great video explaining Bill's shenanigans between trying to play LLC and 501c3 non-profit corporation. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd5ay2vXiVs&list=UUi_3bMXuLoFtRf3Od_HGVJg

Bill, as usual, is trying to play both sides of the coin.  He registered Lawless America as a non-profit listing his wife as the Director.  But non-profits are not allowed to engaged in the political arena as that is specifically reserved for that is called PACs (Political Action Committees).  Beyond that though, both are to be set up with a committee and must track all donations and expenditures.  As a non profit, LA could have paid Bill's expenses and a "salary" for running his fake movie, but that would have to have been approved by the Board of Directors with a full accounting of all revenue and expenses.  As we know, Bill just took the donations and says he can't read when it comes time to file his taxes.  So Lawless America, the non-profit, engaged in political activity without a PAC and took in donations with no appropriate BOD approval and accounting.

For Windsor, Its Always Someone Else's Fault

As we continue to look at the mountains of documents filed in the Maid of the Mist case, and appeal, we see a clear pattern of a complete lack of personal responsibility from Bill.  The judges are mean to me, I'm just a pro se litigant, the housing bubble popped and took all my money.  But what really drives Bill over the edge is when a judge uses a word that perfect describes his actions.

114. Judge Duffey even branded me as a “litigious plaintiff” in the order dated July 30, 2009 (attached hereto as Exhibit 2). “Litigious” is identified as “tending to engage in lawsuits.” (Exhibit 3 hereto.) A “litigious plaintiff” is a person who tends to file lawsuits.” Judge Duffey has no basis to say that. He would have no idea what I have and haven’t been involved with in terms of litigation unless he has false information obtained from some extra-judicial source. Other than Maid of the Mist’s totally improper lawsuit against me, the only lawsuits that I have been involved with personally for the last 15+ years were two legal actions involving real estate (one was an eviction in which my wife and I prevailed but never got paid, and the other was a small claims lawsuit by an attorney trying to buy our home that was dismissed because it was improper under the law). A third lawsuit was filed against me in California by a National Park Service employee who claimed his photograph taken by me at a National Park while he was on duty should not have been used on my personal travel web site. My insurance carrier paid the man $1,000 to go away. My 15-year history as what Judge Duffey describes as a “litigious plaintiff” is that my wife and I sued some people who bounced their rent checks on our unsold Ohio residence, stiffed us for $30,000 or so, and refused to vacate. Contrary to Judge Duffey’s presentation in the order dated July 30, 2009, that I am involved in “three cases,” the truth is that I am involved with one issue: Maid of the Mist and their attorneys. Maid sued me wrongfully. I have sued Maid. 115. The “litigious plaintiff” case that Judge Duffey cites in his order is Martin-Trigona v. Shaw, a case in which a litigant had filed over 250 lawsuits and used litigation as a cruel and effective weapon against his enemies, who are more often imagined than real. Trigona has reportedly sued literally hundreds, if not thousands, of attorneys, judges, their spouses, court officials, and other human beings. His lawsuits have been pursued with "persistence, viciousness, and general disregard for decency and logic." He has used legal pleadings to ventilate his contempt and hatred of persons of Jewish heritage and to level accusations which "have often been personal, have often emphasized racial or religious affiliations, and have often involved the members of ... judges' and counsel's families." The purpose, nature and effect of his resort to multiple litigation has been to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible.

Judge Duffy hit the nail on the head, and Bill objected http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx32b5igLwA. He then selectively choose 15 years because more than that would definitely prove the Judge's point. But what is particularly amazing is how Bill has an out of body experience as he characterizes the Trigona case as something far different than what he is doing. Unlike Bill, Trigona filed tons of lawsuits as a cruel weapon against his enemies, many of which are imagined. This monster even included "judges, court officials, their spouses and other human beings in an effort to involve as many persons in as many confounding legal processes as possible". Right, and we can all see how this Trigona monster differs from what Bill is doing?

Windsor Can't Read During Tax Season

This is going to be a series as we look into Bill's past filings, particularly in Georgia civil action 1:11-CV-01922-TWT and the second amended notice of appeal.  In this filing, we get a pretty good look at all the financial failures, as Bill tells it, that Windsor has been involved in over the past 30 years.  As usual, its everyone else's fault but Bill's that his financial endeavours have been a disaster.   In this filing, Bill tries to claim a negative net worth of almost $1,000,000 while owning two homes worth about $2,000,000 total and having an investment account with Wachovia for over $1,000,000.

Even back in 2011, Bill was playing all kinds of financial games through his wife Barbara as they tried to hide assets from the looming judgement they were about to receive in the Maid of the Mist case.  Bill even shows what kind of game he is playing when he says "there is no law to make a spouse liable to use her separate property to pay for debts of her husband".  The District Court even pointed this out by saying that the Windsor's financial affairs were convoluted.  Then, Bill uses his son Ryan to come up with a $1,000,000 "loan" Bill says he owes to Ryan and Alcatraz for the legal fees in the Maid of the Mist case with a wink and a nod.

Then we have the problem with his taxes.  As we learned in Bill's divorce filing last year, he had not filed a tax return since 2009.  But in this court document we get a little more info on what he did in 09.  Bill says, and I quote:  "The 2009 tax return is inaccurate.  It was submitted when Windsor was unable to read.  It will be amended when time and reading permit.  The 2010 return is on extension due to the same factors."

You see Judge, I suffer from a very rare condition.  Every spring, up till April 15th I can't seem to be able to read.  My doctor diagnosed me with what he called a BS syndrome, but he failed to provide me with medication (rest assured that I am suing him).  So you see, I am simply unable to provide you with current tax returns that could better describe my "convoluted" financial situation.

SAY WHAT???

By NBTDT

Bill Windsor said:   “I am not now and never have been a so-called ‘sovereign’.    Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups.”      Well, maybe Bill is not a ‘sovereign’ as he understands the term.  But it is a fact that GRIP and Lawless America were formed by Bill Windsor to take action based on the political views and methods of change advocated by several radical groups.  

Webster’s defines radical as:   very new and different from what is traditional or ordinary, having extreme political or social views that are not shared by most people.    And, a: very different from the usual or traditional:  extreme  b:  favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions, c:  associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change, d:  advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs.     

For the sake of argument, let’s say the overwhelming majority of American people do not share the view that it is a good idea to form Citizen Grand Juries to oust elected and appointed judiciary, government and law enforcement officials from office for treason, with threat of forced compliance through deployment of militia groups and possibly a death sentence.    Given that the majority of people do not share that vision, any individual or group that does share and support that vision would fit the definition of radical.   

All through this blog we have made connections between several radical groups and Bill Windsor.    So, I put a list together (though, not exhaustive) of the individuals and groups linked to Bill Windsor that, in my opinion, are radical by definition.     Again for the sake of argument:  the term SovCit is used broadly in the list below, to include groups or individuals sharing views similar to Bill’s and each other, on the Constitution, politics and how they want to affect change in the government and judiciary.      

Starting with the CC2009, Bill has direct connections to several state delegates and/or signers of the Articles of Freedom.

Continental Congress Articles of Freedom: http://www.schroederforsenate.com/notes/2012/02/AOF_20100402.pdf

http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_33060.php

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/spring/midwifing-the-militias

Alaska – Schaeffer Cox:  Alaska Citizens Militia and SovCit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schaeffer_Cox

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/?s=Schaeffer+Cox

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1121:alaska-couple-admits-to-plot-to-kill-federal-judge-and-others&catid=25:judicial-corruption-and-dishonesty&Itemid=222

California – Orly Taiz: Birther and SovCit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/summer/meet-the-patriots?page=0,3

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=364384

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=136:orly-taitz-the-queen-of-the-birthers&catid=117:news-reports&Itemid=219

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=633:lawless-america-online-tv-show-sunday-january-29-2012-5-7-pm-et-orly-taitz-will-be-a-guest&catid=108:lawless-america-online-tv-show&Itemid=105

Connecticut – Deborah Stevenson: SovCit

http://www.nheld.com/

http://yedies.blogspot.com/2011/01/scotus-declares-constitution-void.html

Iowa – Michael Angelos: SovCit

http://www.meetup.com/SuperLiberty/, which is sponsored by http://fija.org/

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=474:iowa-citizens-fight-for-grand-jury-rights&Itemid=105

Maine – Wayne Leach & Jack McCarthy: SovCits

http://unmasker4maine.wordpress.com/category/lawless-america/

http://www.mainerepublic.com/?p=212

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xda-Owa567E

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America-Maine/455656671162680

Michigan – David Schied: SovCit

http://shermaninstitute.info/

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/06/08/school-for-scoundrels-online-patriot-university-opens-doors/

http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/cja/members-efforts.htm

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=835:volunteers-needed-to-help-with-lawless-americathe-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=621:what-are-the-goals-for-grip-grip-part-3&catid=107:grip-government-reform-a-integrity-platform&Itemid=105

Missouri – Ray Herron: SovCit

http://libertycandidates.com/2010/05/state-house-mo-district-116-ray-herron/

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/HERRON-Complaint-Rep-Skelton-Jul-2008.pdf

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=786:lawless-americathe-movie-update-please-be-in-the-movie-march-31-deadline-for-information-from-those-who-will-be-in-the-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

New York – Robert (Bob) Shultz: SovCit, Birther and Militia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_the_People_Foundation

http://www.givemeliberty.org/

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=621:what-are-the-goals-for-grip-grip-part-3&catid=107:grip-government-reform-a-integrity-platform&Itemid=105

Pennsylvania – William Taylor Reil: Sovcit

http://www.sheriffbrigadesofpenn.com/

http://www.sheriffbrigadesofpenn.com/about/who-we-are/william-taylor-reil/

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America-Pennsylvania/188973404575330 (see Jan 25 ’14 post)

South Carolina – Karen Ruff: SovCit

http://shermaninstitute.info/ (Bio on page with Schied who lists Lawless America in his bio)

http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profiles/members/

South Dakota – Justin David Shultis: SovCit

http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/1371

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myBT9nxOxyY (interview with Bill)

Texas – Michael Badnarik: SovCit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Badnarik

http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/constitution-preservation/good-to-be-king

http://tyrannyfighters.com/progress-report-2011-01-03/

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=664:julian-heicklen-and-tyranny-fighters-battle-outrages-perpetrated-by-the-us-government&catid=117:news-reports&Itemid=219

Texas – Jon Roland: SovCit and Militia

http://www.constitution.org/cs_defen.htm

http://vimeo.com/7109019

http://constitution.org/c5/

http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/JonRoland?xg_source=activity

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1244:proposed-constitutional-amendments-from-jon-roland-of-the-constitution-society&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR0RswR03ok (interview with Bill)

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=621:what-are-the-goals-for-grip-grip-part-3&catid=107:grip-government-reform-a-integrity-platform&Itemid=105

Edgar Steele: Aryan Nations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Steele

http://www.free-edgar-steele.com/782/thanks-to-mr-bill-windsor-and-his-lawless-america-campaign-8312012/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_ws1xdaG7s (interview with Bill)

Delegates to CC2009 with connections to Bill, David Schied and Jon Roland, were on the GRIP Steering Committee and were state Coordinators.    Bob Shultz was asked to be on the steering committee. 

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=621:what-are-the-goals-for-grip-grip-part-3&catid=107:grip-government-reform-a-integrity-platform&Itemid=105

Others involved with the start-up and organization of GRIP and Lawless America are: 

George Mcdermott: SovCit

http://secretjustice.com/secretpdf/August%209%20impeachment%20request.pdf

http://www.secretjustice.com/

Arnie Rosner: SovCit

http://thejaghunter.wordpress.com/tag/arnie-rosner/

http://scannedretina.com/2012/01/02/we-demand-a-grand-jury/

http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/ArnieRosner

Diane Gochin: SovCit

https://www.facebook.com/NFOJA

http://50states.ning.com/profile/DianeGochin

http://pacourtwatch.blogspot.com/2013_08_01_archive.html

Denise Loughlin: SovCit

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_12-cv-03707/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_12-cv-03707-1.pdf

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=672:you-can-be-in-the-movie-documentary-about-government-corruption-to-be-filmed-in-all-50-states&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

Phil Stimac: SovCit

http://wearewinningourgreatcountryback.ning.com/profile/PhilStimac

Ron Branson: SovCit

http://www.jail4judges.org/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFI5K-YyuTc (interview with Bill)

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=541:ron-branson-on-lawless-america-show-sunday-november-20-2011-5-7-pm-et-&catid=120:news-reports&Itemid=222

Rod Class: SovCit, Militia and “Private Attorney General”

http://americansrepublicparty.org/RodClassDocuments.php

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTplpCGh73E (interview with Bill) 

Other individual and group connections to Bill Windsor:  

Stephanie Strong: SovCit

http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131215/NEWS/312150016/Citizens-boards-aim-rein-corrupt-officials

http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2014/02/so-playing-grand-jury-is-illegal.html?showComment=1393094344256#c8478078876843570529

Gene Paulson: SovCit

http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2014/02/so-playing-grand-jury-is-illegal.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rYOjh2_uDc

Carl Swennson: Birther, SovCit and Militia

http://www.riseupforamerica.com/

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=9140

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcxa3sh5qHM (announcement of formation of Citizens Grand Juries that have returned indictments for treason) 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eukvd_x3Id4 (Oath Keeper video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dge1bs9hfY0 (interview with Bill) 

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=631:obama-a-his-attorney-fail-to-appear-for-trial-2-hour-hearing-provides-strong-evidence-that-obama-is-not-qualified-for-ballot&catid=117:news-reports&Itemid=219

Bob Hurt: SovCit  

http://bobhurt.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-does-sovereign-citizen-mean.html

http://bobhurt.com/articles/law%20-%20How%20to%20Serve%20as%20a%20Court%20Watcher.pdf

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lawmen/oU2ZcrrorbE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iexb4bCGJb4 (interview with Bill)

Richard Fine: SovCit

http://www.richardfinelaw.com/

http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/20100524/supreme-court-rules-against-jailed-lawyer-richard-fine

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1230:attorney-richard-fine-exposes-judicial-corruption-for-lawless-americathe-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105 (includes clip of interview with Bill)

Robert Fox: SovCit (and Canadian Fugitive)

http://www.kltv.com/story/8368308/police-raid-house-of-israel

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2008/winter/house-of-ill-repute

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkE3p6tneH4 (interview with Bill)

Veronica (Niki) Hannevig:  SovCit

http://nikihannevig.blogspot.com/

http://shermaninstitute.info/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bkZ-c2bz5U (interview with Bill)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America-Pennsylvania/188973404575330

National Liberty Alliance: SovCit

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lawless-America-Pennsylvania/188973404575330

Windsor Found Not Credible in Montana

http://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0618%20Noncite/Memorandum%20--%20Opinion?id={5B24CC86-9BAA-4E96-8863-187A822BB699}
Just a day after being slapped with the vexatious litigant tag in Texas, Bill suffered a humiliating defeat in Montana in his appeal for a temporary order of protection against Boushie.  The Montana Supreme Court issued a memorandum opinion which is not subject to case law (sorry Bill you wont be famous) in which they denied both of Bill's attempts for a TOP against Sean.

Bill had applied for a TOP in Ravilli County, and then once denied, he tried it in the City of Missoula, again being denied.  As we have chronicled, Bill's entire life is built on not taking no for an answer so he appealed it all the way up to the Montana Supreme Court.

The Court found that all of Bill's extravagant claims of cyber-stalking and being in fear of bodily harm were not supported by actual evidence or the facts.  Why would someone drive over a thousand miles and come in to close proximity of the person he claims is threatening his life?  Those are not the actions of a person who is in fear of his life, the Court found (they are calling him a liar basically).  "The District Court thus found that Windsor’s claim of reasonable apprehension of bodily injury “appears specious.”  Thats a fancy way of saying, you lied Bill.

Then they addressed the infamous car bursting on fire incident.  You know, the one where Bill was driving up to go stalk Boushie and the car in front of him burst in to flames, obviously, as Bill claimed, part of a murder attempt by Sean.  Bill quickly got out of his car and took some high quality no doubt copyrighted photos of the incident (again, if you thought you were being shot at why did you stop and get out of the car?)  One photo was submitted in court as "proof" of wild Bill's claims.  The Court addressed it by saying:  "Windsor submitted one of these photos; however, the District Court observed that “[t]he ‘photo’ of this incident submitted by Windsor is a virtually all black Rorschach blot, indecipherable, and contributes nothing of value, except to increase the Court’s skepticism of Windsor’s credibility.”  I hate to break it to you here Bill, but they are basically calling you a liar once again and a bad photographer.

As a parting gift, the Court gave Bill another blow to his other frivolous lawsuits all across the Country.  "There is no credible evidence that Boushie harassed, threatened, or intimidated Windsor.
Moreover, the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity,
§ 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved
“First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear
familiar and in which they regularly engage.”
NOOOOOOO Court, you got it all wrong, only Bill's speech is protected by the First Amendment, everyone else is defamation, stalking, identity theft, libel and malicious fill in the blank...and any other words I come across that I can add.

You can find a good scouting report on vexatious Bill over here http://lifeinpiercecounty.com/

Don't Mess With Texas

Windsor came in to Judge Bob Carroll's court this morning in what he told his followers was a "trial".  It was actually just a hearing on Google's special exception.  Not only was Google's exception upheld, but Carroll ruled that Bill must adhere to Judge Thrash's vexatious litigant ruling. Windsor tried to tell Judge Carroll about all the new motions, names and fillings he wanted to add but he was cut off mid-sentence and told that they were only there to address the Google issue. This means that Joeycon is on hold while Bill begs for a federal judge to let him sue his legion of unknown "haters".  Windsor's horrible reputation precedes him.

The back of Bill's head started to turn red as Carroll read his ruling.  Windsor's hands were visibly shaking as you could feel the rage building.  Now all his named defendants can be dismissed upon request while he waits for a federal judge to let him continue his frivolous lawsuits in Texas.  If the federal judge learns that Bill tried to sue 50+ judges in Georgia alone, he most certainly will not be granted permission.

Having suffered a huge loss today as his made up "trial", Bill is once again looking for a new home. The vexatious litigant is not allowed to ride in Texas and Georgia now, so where will he go to quench his insatiable thirst for frivolous lawsuits.

First Rule of Fight Club?

So the phrase of the week seems to be citizen grand juries.  It seems that Bill and David Schied were both contacted by the FBI and asked about their involvement in the Sovereign Citizen movementand specifically their plans related to citizen grand juries.  And with this coming on the heels of Lawless member Paulson being arrested for trying to carry out the stupid stunt, Bills' and David's answers differ quite a bit.

Bill is only playing games and he can change his story in mid sentence without batting an eye.  When asked if he was a Sovereign....he adhered to the first rule of being a Sovereign http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2lmFCqbJcI.  He then brought in a new phrase to his lexicon by saying he didn't propose citizen grand juries but rather "Special Regulatory Grand Juries" despite the mountains of documents and videos where he did propose citizen grand juries.

Then we have ole David Schied who really is a believer.  He isn't playing games and he refuses to lie.  This puts him at a great disadvantage in this world of underground anarchists and makes him a liability to the them. David recaps all the details and more in this article:  http://ppjg.me/2014/02/19/why-would-the-fbi-be-calling-on-me-to-ask-if-i-know-anyone-who-is-organizing-independent-common-law-grand-juries/

Incredibly long story slightly shorter....an FBI agent contacted David because of his connections to both the late Trish Kraus and Bill Windsor and that they "were somehow involved in a "domestic terrorist" organization called Lawless America".  Will Bill now be adding the FBI to his lawsuits?  Well, instead of following SOP, David like a boy scout went right ahead and gave this agent a long lecture about the sad state of our Country, particularity the legal system. Then when asked about the buzz word of the week, citizen grand juries, instead of denying it or making up a new word like Bill, David went full speed ahead.

"In addressing Agent Brand’s concern about independent grand juries springing up in Michigan without the authorization of these very same (corrupt) judges (and their counterparts in the executive branch), I reasoned that I and others across Michigan and the United States have enough evidence to show that We The People have no other means of accessing any other state or federal grand juries for reporting these government crimes. As case-in-point, I referred to my own numerous case demands to both the judicial and executive branches of both state and federal government for access to the real government of “the People,” by way of either petit or grand juries, and as both a civil “plaintiff” and as a bona fide “crime victim.” I also described how I have thereafter been repeatedly denied such access to anyone outside of government (i.e., “the People” of a petit or grand jury) by both the courts and the prosecutors. I pointed out that I have had so many denials of grand juries by the judicial branch that the latest responses to my demands, at both the state and federal levels, have been to threaten me with sanctions if I file such a court action again clarifying and redressing my demand of this all-important recognition that government crimes are being committed…in spades."

So there you have it mr. FBI agent in an unusually open, honest and transparent way.  Agent Brand goes on to articulate the whole platform of this blog and why we have been following bill and his appointed number two guy Schied:

"I doubt that Agent Brand was taking notes, though he was likely recording our conversation as he further elaborated upon his characterization of the classic sovereign by his definition. He described the person as one who locates a single code or statute and uses it to justify one’s own exemption from being subjugated to the chain of other written laws. This is the person who propagates wrongful information while relying upon just that one statute and a limited interpretation of the law, even though such an interpretation might be entirely correct. His concern was the disregarding of the greater context of other laws, either leading up to or encompassing the one being referenced by the sovereign; and that they were encouraging others to join in on relying upon such a limited interpretation of the law while breaking other laws. In regard to those who are undermining and circumventing the laws to form their own grand juries, Agent Brand insinuated that some of those involved in this movement appear to be people who might have fought numerous court battles and emerged as “disgruntled litigants” (like Bill Windsor) who simply did not like the results of the judicial rulings against them."

I give a standing ovation to our brave public servant FBI agent Brand in articulating exactly what is going on here.  Bill, David and Lawless are not about exposing real government corruption, its about revenge against a system that rendered a ruling they didn't like and they simply refuse to abide by the ruling of the court. Instead, they want to destroy the very fabric of our society.  No evidence, no due process, no actual democracy, just pure vigilante justice at its most primitive form.

The rest of the piece is Schied putting on his reading glasses and giving the agent a long....long.......loooong lecture filled with the usual Sovereign Citizen propaganda with the all caps word TREASON littered throughout the dissertation.  The main point being that when asked by a man with a badge, David didn't run from the Lawless America dogma, he reiterated it.  Bill Windsor, when put in the same spot, ran from his previous initiates.  For all his faults, and they are many, Schied sticks to his guns as a true believer in what he espouses.  I can at least respect that.  Bill is just simply a vindictive baby hell bent on getting back against any and everyone who dared to speak out against his self serving goals.

The Windsor Report

Remember that movie Minority Report where three psychics could see the future through precognition with such certainty that they could prevent crime before it happened?  Well Bill has added that power to his super vexatious abilities.  Yes he can sue you before you defame him, he just knows you will.

Bill Windsor 32 minutes ago · Edited
THE MAGNITUDE OF THE LIES AND DEFAMATION DONE AGAINST ME IS LITERALLY BEYOND COMPREHENSION so what is there to understand?.
WITH JOEYISALITTLEKID ALONE, APPROXIMATELY 8,000 PAGES OF STUFF what is stuff?, SINGLE-SPACED well why would you double space it?, 9-POINT TYPE.  yeah you are the master of specificity
The Joeys include many people who were filmed ummm name one? and proved to be dishonest your definition of proof doesn't jive with Websters'. You all know many of the names you mean random names you constantly throw out?. You may be surprised at a few that will soon be disclosed. don't tell me Santa Claus is next
I can't even hazard a guess how many libelous statements there are well you kinda have to in a court of law. I would guess tens of thousands not millions?. Each libelous, defamatory statement is a separate violation of the law. It could take the rest of my life just to cite them all what a fulfilling life you have here Bill.
These things you can't sue objects Bill, but I would leave it to you to try will not be able to prove that any of these libelous statements they made are true.
Let me state a few things for the record: the record is now on a facebook page?
I am not now and never have been a so-called "sovereign." you can't stand their monthly dues Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups. other than adopting all their ideology and trying to carry out most of it on my own, I have nothing to do with them
I am absolutely non-violent, and I have never proposed or supported any violence. Anyone making such a claim to the FBI or anyone else is making a false accusation and is defaming me by trying to link me to radical groups.  this is starting to sound like you know you are in trouble
I have never proposed that any American be put to death except public officials for treason. You believe what you choose preferably the truth, but I personally support abolishing the death penalty in all cases except treason well you just contradicted yourself, maybe we can see a Windsor vs Windsor case coming to a courthouse near you. I believe treason is as serious as it gets forget murder, potentially affecting every American. I believe the death penalty should remain for treason as a deterrent and lets let the cop killers run off. And if a jury finds a person has committed treason and decides the death penalty is proper, then I support that and who gets to define this treason of yours?. I am totally opposed to the death penalty in all other matters because the system is so hopelessly broken with dishonesty, corruption, and an apparently widespread convict-at-all-cost mentality that sounds like a lot of death penalties you have lined up then doesn't it?. Anyone making the claim to the FBI or anyone else that I have proposed killing all (or even one) elected official, appointed official, or government employee is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me. YOU JUST SAID THAT EXACT THING BILL.  You can't even make one sentence between lies anymore
I have never proposed "citizen grand juries" as the solution to our problems yeah, you proposed them without the "". I proposed the creation of "Special Regulatory Grand Juries" by state legislatures well this is news to all those Lawless Followers and all those talkshoe shows where you gave them step by step instructions to infiltrate local grand juries. This has been fully explained on www,lawlessamerica.com we can both agree on that. IF we can't get some honest people elected who will try to save America from the rampant corruption, then I proposed that we create some type of citizen review structure where we bring the corruption to light uh huh, case by case. Anyone claiming that my proposal is to create citizen grand juries of the type that have failed in the past is making a false accusation and is defaming me. ohhh here we go with the Bill semantics....yeah, you only propose the kind that won't fail, other than that its the same ole garden variety citizen grand jury.
I have never in my life scammed anyone where can I get a copy of Round America?, committed fraud what happened to the donated RV?, or conned anyone where can I see the movie Lawless America?. Anyone making such a statement is making a false accusation of crimes and is defaming me. or being deadly accurate with what you have been doing
I have never evaded taxes in my life you just don't file tax returns, at least not lately. All donations received by me for the movie what movie, videos what videos?, and Lawless America projects like pie eating contests? have been fully accounted for where is this?  Why not be transparent?. The movie trips and work have been financed approximately 75% by me wow, that's a lot more donations than I thought. Until I formed a 501 c 3 was it approved?, I never said any donation was tax-deductible yeah you said they might be, and I have proof galore of that. Once the 501 c 3 was formed, a very small number of donations were received (perhaps less than $2,000), and I don't know if those are deductible or not show me the money. Anyone telling the FBI, IRS, State of Delaware, or anyone that any money is unaccounted for, a receipt was not provided if requested, or that anything improper was done is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me. why not prove that?
Neither my ex-wife, my son, nor any family member has ever owned any part of Lawless America, my websites, or the movie uhhhhh, if you say so Mr. Bill. I used to use my son's hosting service uh huh, but when the threats got to be too great, he told me I had to leave he said dad has to go. I moved to Godaddy you took him literally several years ago -- before the movie trip and then to Bulkregister wait so the "threats" were that bad even before you started your fake movie tour?. My ex-wife was listed as the administrative contact for all web domains that I own yeah that would kinda imply she had something to do with it. That does not in any way indicate ownership but certainly points to it. I always owned them. I set them all up you did do lots of set ups, I'll give you that. I paid for them. Anyone making claims about involvement of my family and ex-wife is making false accusations for which there is and can never be any proof, is defaming me, and is wrongfully attempting to include people who are not involved just to cause trouble. sounds like you are pretty worried about Barb getting sworn in for court testimony
Anyone who claims I ever stalked anyone is making a false accusation of a crime and is defaming me so you just drove by Allie, Boushie, Brannon, and Hernandez's houses and post the pictures of them online by happenstance?. All I have ever done is expose criminals name one, and I will continue to do so with every ounce of energy that I have so you stalk and you will continue to stalk?. If you don't want to be in a video or movie, be honest and don't defame and cyberstalk me. If you do, I will expose stalk and harass you. I will come to your town to film, if possible. that's what we call stalking...Mr. bill
I will soon start posting the evidence to www.joeyisalittlekid.com. you are coming over here to stalk us now? It will chronicle all the legal filings and evidence in this case. I bet the court clerk loves seeing you come in Other evidence and legal filings may be seen at www.allieoverstreet.com , www.claudinedombrowski.com, www,seanboushie.com, those are three examples of cyber stalking www.lawlessamerica.com, and www.lawlessamerica.org.
We we?  all the voices in your head? now have a very good system for capturing all the online statements wow, most people had that 15 years ago. I have sued every person who has defamed me or will defame me what if the other two agatha's disagree?  Sue em as I have named "John Doe, Jane Doe, and Joey Doe" parties sounds like you really have them pinned down. I would be delighted to add you as long as the courts allow it he is now speaking to all humanity here, and if you defame me, I will sue you and expose you and even if you don't, consider yourself sued. That's not a threat; it's a promise and you have the vexatious badge to back that up. I want to make each and every one of the cyberstalkers famous but you don't have a movie though do you. I hope my cases will establish precedents that will serve as a deterrent to others hope isn't a plan.
I could type for the rest of my life, so I will stop. you should try sleeping sometime, maybe a nice walk in the park or a night out on the town, your obsession is consuming you
I pray that I have gotten lucky with honest judges and that I will get to present this outrage to jurors we don't have enough trees to survive that. These people have all but "killed" Lawless America good that was the goal, the movie so you admit there is no movie, and me you are still around aren't ya?, and we need a massive financial award and removal of all the defamation and stalking to have a chance to continue effectively. so no movie ever.....got it.

So Playing Grand Jury is Illegal?

http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131220/NEWS/312200025/Activists-trying-bring-citizen-grand-juries-state-they-legal-?nclick_check=1

Gene Paulson was a founding father of Lawless America or its starter group GRIP.  You can see his "they done me wrong" video here  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rYOjh2_uDc. Well Gene didn't get the the cease and desist memo from Bill about that citizen grand jury stunt Bill had planned last year.  He went ahead and tried it, and in Bill's (latest) home state of all things http://www.argusleader.com/article/20131220/NEWS/312200025/Activists-trying-bring-citizen-grand-juries-state-they-legal-?nclick_check=1.  Where is Shied when you need him?  I thought these stunts were fool proof?

Paulson now faces up to 7 years in prison for merely carrying out what Bill had told him and hundreds of people to do.  As you can read in the story some more Lawless lemmings pop up in the form of Stephanie Strong...another South Dakota resident (what do they put in the water up there?).  Stephanie, as we see here http://politicalsmokeout.tumblr.com/post/40016083808/strong-faces-fee-request-doubles-down-on-recording, is not a big fan of rules.  And like Bill, she is finding that seemingly everything she files gets dubed "frivolous and malicious" along with a consequence.  Have they taken their country back yet?  Why is it that their vigilante justice always ends badly for them?

Happy Valentines Day!!!

Many people are getting letters from the very lonely and desperate Bill Windsor this Valentines Day, but none of them are filled with love.  Its hard suing in 6 different states all at the same time all for the same thing.
But this is how the divorced Bill Windsor is spending this Valentines Day.  Hopefully this is the last Valentines Day Bill spends as a self made public figure.